Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal最新文献

Objective: To increase awareness and improve perioperative care of patients with cleft palate (CP) and coexisting cardiopulmonary anomalies.

Design: Retrospective cohort.

Setting: Multi-center.

Patients/participants: Patients who underwent surgical repair of CP between 2012-2020 identified in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Pediatric Data File. Chi-squared analysis and Student's t-test were implemented to make associations between congenital heart disease (CHD) and congenital pulmonary disease (CPD) and postoperative complications. Multiple logistic regression was performed to identify associations between CP and CHD/CPD while controlling for age, gender, and ASA class. C2 values were used to assess the logistic regressions, with a significance level of 0.05 indicating statistical significance.

Main outcomes measures: Length of stay (LOS), perioperative complications (readmission, reoperation, reintubation, wound dehiscence, cerebrovascular accidents, and mortality).

Results: 9 96 181 patients were identified in the database, 17 786 of whom were determined to have CP, of whom 16.0% had congenital heart defects (CHD) and 13.2% had congenital pulmonary defects (CPD). Patients with CHD and CPD were at a significantly greater risk of increased LOS and all but one operative complication rate (wound dehiscence) relative to patients with CP without a history of CHD and CPD.

Conclusion: This study suggests that congenital cardiopulmonary disease is associated with increased adverse outcomes in the setting of CP repair. Thus, heightened clinical suspicion for coexisting congenital anomalies in the presence of CP should prompt referring providers to perform a comprehensive and multidisciplinary evaluation to ensure cardiopulmonary optimization prior to surgical intervention.

Objective: To compare postoperative outcomes and costs between inpatient and outpatient ABG in the United States.

Design: Retrospective cohort.

Setting: Multi-institutional/national.

Patients and participants: Patients who underwent ABG (n = 6649) were identified in the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Pediatric database from 2012-2021. Inpatient and outpatient cohorts were matched using coarsened exact matching.

Main outcomes measure(s): Thirty-day readmission, reoperation, and complications. A modified Markov model was developed to estimate the cost difference between cohorts. One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed.

Results: After matching, 3718 patients were included, of which 1859 patients were in each hospital-setting cohort. The inpatient cohort had significantly higher rates of reoperations (0.6% vs. 0.2%; p = 0.032) and surgical site infections (0.8% vs. 0.2%; p = 0.018). The total cost of outpatient ABG was estimated to be $10,824 vs. $20,955 for inpatient ABG, resulting in $10,131 cost savings per patient. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis revealed that all 10,000 simulations resulted in consistent cost savings for the outpatient cohort that ranged from $8000 to $24,000.

Conclusions: Outpatient ABG has become increasingly more popular over the past ten years, with a majority of cases being performed in the ambulatory setting. If deemed safe for the individual patient, outpatient ABG may confer a lower risk of nosocomial complications and offer significant cost savings to the healthcare economy.

Objectives: To objectively quantify results of sagittal lip changes following Abbe flap reconstruction in patients with bilateral cleft lip.

Design: Retrospective, observational study.

Setting: Single institution, 8-year retrospective review.

Patients/participants: In total, 17 patients with bilateral cleft lip that underwent Abbe flap reconstruction were included in this study.

Intervention: Patients had lateral photographs taken prior to Abbe flap reconstruction and at least 8 months post-Abbe flap.

Main outcome measurements: Vegter's index, Sushner's S2 line and Burstone's B line reference lines were used for evaluation of sagittal lip changes. Wilcoxon signed rank tests were used in analysis.

Results: The mean pre-Abbe flap upper to lower lip ratio, defined as Vegter's Lip Index, was 0.906 compared to a mean of 0.946 following Abbe flap reconstruction. The mean upper to lower lip ratio for Sushner's S2 and Burstone's B line exhibited an increase in upper lip sagittal projection from -0.164 to 1.459 and 0.259 to 0.957, respectively (P < 0.001).

Conclusions: This study quantifies sagittal changes to upper and lower lip position after Abbe flap reconstruction. These findings may aid in operative planning and patient/caregiver expectations during counseling.

I've Just Seen a Face is a new resource produced by author Amy Mendillo and is designed for parents of children with cleft lip and/or palate to help them to navigate the first year of life. In this invited article, Kenny Ardouin provides an overview of the book, and offers perspective on the content contained within, including potential issues for professionals working with cleft to consider. The review ends with recommendations for likely beneficiaries of the book, as well as considerations for additional future versions of the book.

Objective: To determine a baseline of anticipated change in nasolabial appearance following primary repair of unilateral cleft lip/palate and evaluate the degree to which revision surgery improves nasolabial appearance.

Design: Retrospective chart review.

Setting: Patients treated at the Lancaster Cleft Palate Clinic interdisciplinary clinic.

Patients: Twenty-three patients with complete unilateral cleft lip and palate who underwent primary surgical repair and 19 additional patients who underwent subsequent revision surgery were included.

Interventions: Patients in the non-revision group underwent a Tennison-Randall triangular flap lip repair at 3mo. Patients in the revision group underwent a modification of the Nakajima straight-line repair after primary Tennison-Randall triangular flap lip repair at an average age of 141mo.

Main outcome measures: A modification of the Asher-McDade Aesthetic Index was utilized to evaluate Nasolabial Frontal (NLF), Nasolabial Profile (NLP), Vermillion Border (VB), and total change in appearance. Scores for patients in the revision group were evaluated before and after revision while appearance for patients without revision was evaluated at 3 distinct ages. Scores were averaged across time-points and inter-rater reliability was assessed.

Results: Nasolabial appearance in the non-revision sample did not change significantly over time, except for nasal profile. Scores improved after revision surgery - NLP: 3.48 to 2.97, (p = 0.001); NLF: 3.50 to 2.95 (p = 0.001); and Total Nasolabial Score: 3.29 to 3.01 (p = 0.004), with no significant change in VB.

Conclusion: Decisions regarding need for nasolabial revision surgery may be made as early as 5yo with successful outcomes following secondary surgery improving appearance except for vermillion border appearance.

Objective: To determine the effect of ketorolac on opiate requirement and hospital length of stay after palatoplasty.

Design: This was a retrospective chart review.

Setting: This study was completed at an urban tertiary medical center.

Patients: Those who underwent palatoplasty with a pediatric otolaryngologist between 2010-2020.

Interventions: Incorporation of standing Ketorolac into the immediate post-operative pain regimen.

Main outcome measures: T-test analysis was performed to determine whether initiation of ketorolac within 24 h post-palatoplasty was correlated with shorter length hospitalization or reduced opiate requirement.

Results: A total of 55 pediatric subjects (49.1% female) were included in this study. Average age at time of surgery was 13 months (range 9.9-33.9 months). On two tailed t-test, use of ketorolac within the first 24 h after palatoplasty was associated with shorter length of stay (mean of 1.68 vs 2.57 days, t = 2.58, P = .01) and lower total opiate dosage during hospitalization (mean of 2.8 vs 9.16 morphine milligram equivalents, t = 3.37, P = .001).

Conclusions: Among patients undergoing palatoplasty, there is a significant relationship between the early utilization of ketorolac and decreased length of hospitalization as well as decreased opiate requirement. This has important consequences to help improve pain control with reduced opiates requirement as well as length of stay. Future prospective studies can help elicit the causative effect of Ketorolac on these parameters and can investigate whether use of Ketorolac has an effect on long term recovery and post-discharge opiate requirements as well.

Objective: This study aimed to (1) assess layperson preferences for how surgical information is presented; (2) evaluate how the format of visual information relates to layperson comfort with undergoing surgery, perceptions of surgeon character traits, and beliefs about artistic skill impacting plastic surgery practice; and (3) identify sociodemographic characteristics associated with these outcomes.

Design: A survey was developed in which one of five standardized sets of information depicting a unilateral cleft lip repair was presented as (1) text alone, (2) quick sketches, (3) simple drawings, (4) detailed illustrations, or (5) photographs.

Setting: Online crowdsourcing platform.

Participants: Raters aged 18 years and older from the United States.

Interventions: None.

Main outcome measure(s): After viewing the surgical information, participants answered three sets of Likert scale questions. Ratings were averaged to produce three composite scores assessing (1) comfort with undergoing surgery (2) perceptions of surgeon character traits, and (3) beliefs about plastic surgery and artistry.

Results: Four hundred seventy-nine participants were included. Surgeon character traits score was highest among participants who viewed detailed illustrations at 4.46 ± 0.59, followed by photographs at 4.43 ± 0.54, text alone at 4.28 ± 0.59, simple drawings at 4.17 ± 0.67, and quick sketches at 4.17 ± 0.71 (p = 0.0014). Participants who viewed detailed illustrations rated surgical comfort score and plastic surgery and artistry score highest, although differences did not achieve statistical significance.

Conclusions: Viewing detailed cleft lip repair illustrations was significantly associated with positive perceptions of surgeon character traits. Our data help to contextualize methods of communication and education valued by the public when seeking cleft care.

Objective: This study aimed to determine the efficacy of gingivoperiosteoplasty (GPP) in preventing alveolar bone grafting (ABG) among children with cleft lip and palate (CLP).

Design/setting: Retrospective university hospital single center study.

Patients: Children with CLP treated with GPP from 2000-2015 were included. Those under eight years of age, without definitive conclusions regarding need for ABG or with incomplete data were excluded.

Interventions: Included patients were analyzed for demographics, cleft type, age at GPP, associated cleft surgery, use of nasoalveolar molding (NAM), indication for ABG, operating surgeon and presence of residual alveolar fistula. T-tests and Fisher's exact tests were utilized for statistical analysis.

Main outcome measure: The need for ABG.

Results: Of the 1682 children identified with CLP, 64 underwent GPP and met inclusion criteria. 78% of patients with CLP who underwent GPP were recommended for ABG. Those who received GPP at a younger age (P = .004) and at the time of initial cleft lip repair (P = .022) were less likely to be recommended for ABG. Patients with complete CLP were more likely to be recommended for ABG than patients with cleft lip and alveolus only (P = .015). The operating surgeon impacted the likelihood of ABG (P = .004). Patient gender, race, ethnicity, laterality, and NAM were not significantly associated with recommendation for ABG.

Conclusion: GPP does not preclude the need for ABG. Therefore, the success of ABG after GPP and maxillary growth restriction should be analyzed further to determine if GPP is a worthwhile adjunct to ABG in cleft care.

Objective: Delayed repair of cleft palate is associated with worse speech outcomes. Social determinants of health may influence the timing of surgery; however, there are no population health investigations to evaluate factors such as travel distance, language barriers, and payer. This study sought to identify factors that may interfere with timely cleft palate repair.

Design: Retrospective cohort.

Setting: National/multi-center.

Patients/participants: All cleft palate repairs within California were extracted from 2000-2021.

Main outcomes measures: The primary outcome was age at surgical repair, which was modeled with linear regression. Covariates included race, primary language, distance from patient home to hospital, socioeconomic status, primary payer, and managed care enrollment status.

Results: 11 260 patients underwent surgical repair of a cleft palate. Black race was associated with delayed repair (22 additional days, P = .004, 95% CI 67.00-37.7) along with Asian/Pacific-Islander race (11 additional days, P = .006, 95% CI 3.26-18.9) compared to white race. Spanish-speaking patients had significantly later cleft palate repairs by 19 days, (P < .001, 95% CI 10.8-27.7) compared with English-speaking. Further distances from the hospital were significantly associated with later cleft surgeries with out-of-state patients undergoing surgery 52 days later (P < .001, 95% CI 11.3-24.3). Managed care plans and Medi-Cal were significantly associated with earlier surgical repair compared with private insurance.

Conclusion: Black, Asian Pacific Islander, and Spanish-speaking patients and greater distance traveled to hospital were associated with delayed cleft palate repairs. These results underscore the importance of addressing structural and social barriers to care to improve outcomes and reduce health disparities for patients with cleft palate.

Objective: To compare the differences of facial aesthetic evaluation between patients with Cleft Lip and/or Palate (CL/P) and professionals for the treatment outcome of CL/P.

Design: This systematic review was conducted on MedLine, Web of Science, Embase and Cochrane Library databases. The Risk of Bias in Non-randomized Studies of Intervention (ROBINS-I) tool was used to evaluate the included researches.

Setting: Not applicable.

Patients, participants: Patients with CL/P and professionals.

Interventions: Not applicable.

Main outcome measures: The facial aesthetic evaluation of patients with CL/P and professionals.

Results: Among the 1695 literatures retrieved, 22 articles were included, including 974 patients with CL/P and 251 professionals. The bias risk assessment on 21 articles was rated "Moderate" and only one article was rated "Serious". Due to the high heterogeneity of the included studies, meta-analysis was not possible, so descriptive analysis was conducted. Among the included studies, two articles indicated similar views from both groups, 19 noted differences between the two groups, of which three articles indicated more positive evaluation by professionals and nine articles indicated more positive evaluation by patients.

Conclusions: The available data indicate that there is a difference between patients with CL/P and professionals in the aesthetic evaluation, but it is not clear which group is more positive. During the treatment of patients with CL/P, apart from the objective aesthetic evaluation, professionals should fully consider subjective ideas and self-assessment of patients, in order to improve the quality of life for patients.