Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing最新文献

Background: Work-related stressors have been associated with physician suicide. Physician burnout and depression were exacerbated by the COVID-19 pandemic, remain unresolved and of national concern. Future pandemics are predicted. This study is the first to characterize professional and pandemic-related stressors in physician suicides during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Aims: This study aimed to evaluate whether there was a change in reported job-related stressors after the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Methods: Physician suicides were identified within the National Violent Death Reporting System dataset (March 1, 2020 to December 31, 2021). Free-text law enforcement and medical examiner notes for physician suicides were analyzed using reflexive thematic analysis.

Results: Of 307 physician suicides, 70 included professional or pandemic-related stressors associated with death. Themes included pandemic-related dysregulation, financial distress, relationship issues, mental/physical/substance use problems, grief, and discipline.

Linking evidence to action: While loss of employment, physical, mental health, legal, and substance use issues continue to be associated with suicide, grief and pandemic-specific stress were novel findings. Fear of disease, quarantine, and prolonged illness due to contracting COVID warrant psychological support. Psychological support is also indicated for recent discharge, grief management, transition into retirement, and during disciplinary processes. The stress of a pandemic may exacerbate previous risks. Proactive physician suicide prevention measures remain indicated.

Background: Evidence-based practice (EBP) is essential for clinical decision-making, integrating the best available evidence, clinical expertise, and stakeholder values. In Italy, interest in EBP is growing, and a key step in its promotion is adopting tools to assess nurses' beliefs and behaviors toward EBP. While the EBP Beliefs Scale has been translated and validated in multiple languages, it has yet to be adapted for the Italian context.

Aims: This study aims to adapt EBP measurement tools for the Italian context and evaluate their psychometric properties.

Methods: This study used an observational cross-sectional design. The process of cross-cultural translation, adaptation, and validation was adopted. A panel of experts culturally adapted the Beliefs Scales (long and short version) through the item and scale content validity (I-CVI, S-CVI). To test the psychometric properties, 409 nurses were asked to complete the two scales. Confirmatory factor analysis was conducted to validate the factor structure within the Italian context. Convergent validity between the long and short versions of the scale was assessed using the correlation coefficient (r), and the reliability was assessed by computing Cronbach's alpha.

Results: The I-CVI and S-CVI for the long and short version ranged from 0.75 to 1.00. The CFA model performed for the long and short version reported a good fit without the need for further refinements. The Cronbach's alpha was higher than 0.80 for both scales. The correlation of 0.615 (p < 0.01) indicated a moderate to strong positive relationship supporting the convergent validity of the short version in relation to the long version.

Linking evidence to action: In time-constrained settings, the short scale should be utilized for efficient assessments and longitudinal tracking of changes. The long version serves as a complementary tool for in-depth analysis, facilitating a deeper understanding of underlying factors and informing targeted interventions to address specific barriers.

Background: Although cancer is a worldwide public health problem, it can be detected early and prevented through cancer screening. However, not all individuals are motivated to undergo cancer screening. Current studies have revealed that decision aids can impact decision-related outcomes among individuals at risk of cancer. However, their efficacy on decision knowledge and decision conflict remains unclear.

Aims: The purpose of this meta-analysis was to appraise the efficacy of decision aids on decision knowledge and conflict among people at risk of cancer.

Methods: Nine electronic databases were utilized to search the literature until October 31, 2024. The Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool 2.0 and the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach were used to evaluate the certainty of evidence. The data were analyzed using Stata 16.0.

Results: Thirteen relevant studies with 2971 participants published between 2002 and 2023. The pooled results showed that decision aids significantly improved decision knowledge (SMD = 0.45, 95% CI [0.19-0.72], p = 0.00) and decreased decision conflict (SMD = -0.47, 95% CI [-0.73 to -0.21], p = 0.00). Subgroup analyses revealed that the framework, format, population, and duration of decision aids can influence their effects on decision knowledge and decision conflict among people at risk of cancer.

Linking evidence to action: This meta-analysis illuminates that decision aids are effective for improving decision knowledge and diminishing decision conflict among people at risk of cancer. The framework, format, population, and duration should be considered when developing decision aids. Our findings may suggest future directions for assisting people at risk of cancer in making informed decisions about cancer screening. Additional trustworthy research is required to verify these findings.

Background: Nurses face heightened risks of developing posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) due to occupational stressors, with prevalence rates significantly higher than the general population before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. Although PTSD symptoms are known to impair various domains of functioning, research examining which specific PTSD symptom clusters most strongly impact nurses' functioning remains limited.

Aims: This study examines how individual PTSD symptom clusters relate to overall functioning and distracted practice, a measure of workplace functioning, in nurses with probable PTSD.

Methods: We examined relationships between PTSD symptoms and functioning among 420 U.S. nurses recruited through social media platforms in late 2021. Participants completed validated measures assessing PTSD symptom clusters (PTSD Checklist for DSM-5), anxiety (Generalized Anxiety Disorder Scale), depression (Patient Health Questionnaire), general psychosocial functioning (The Brief Inventory of Psychosocial Functioning), and a proxy measure for workplace functioning (Distracted Practice Scale), with hierarchical regression analyses used to evaluate the unique contributions of PTSD symptom clusters to functional outcomes while controlling for demographic, workplace, and mental health variables.

Results: PTSD symptom clusters accounted for significant additional variance in both general functional impairment (9.5%) and occupational impairment (9.3%), beyond demographic, workplace, and other mental health variables. For general psychosocial impairment, PTSD cluster D, negative alterations in cognition and mood, and cluster E, arousal symptoms, were the most impactful, whereas PTSD cluster B, reexperiencing, and cluster D were most strongly associated with workplace functional impairments. Final models revealed that education level predicted general psychosocial impairment while years of nursing experience predicted impairments in workplace functioning.

Linking evidence to action: Nurses with PTSD during the COVID-19 pandemic faced significant impairments in overall and work functioning. Our findings highlight that PTSD symptoms vary in how they impact functioning. Symptom clusters such as negative mood, arousal, and reexperiencing were linked to worsened functioning. Tailored support programs should address specific PTSD symptoms.

Background: Nurse managers are pivotal to the successful implementation of evidence-based practice (EBP). However, enhancing their skills and competencies remains a critical priority. Assessing the influence of nurse managers' competencies in managing and practicing EBP is essential, as it directly impacts outcomes across all levels of healthcare institutions.

Purpose: This study explored how leadership, organizational support, and knowledge management influence EBP implementation among nurse managers.

Methods: A descriptive correlational study was conducted with a convenience sample of nurse managers in seven Egyptian hospitals. A total of 369 nurse managers completed three validated instruments: EBP Leadership and Organizational Support Scale (EBPLOSS), Knowledge Management Competencies for Nurse Managers (KMQN), and EBP Questionnaire (EBPQ). Descriptive statistics, hierarchical regression, and structural equation modeling (SEM) were applied for data analysis.

Results: Nurse managers reported high levels of perceived EBP leadership (84.7%), organizational support (79.52%), knowledge management (KM) competencies (75.15%), and EBP implementation (74.83%). SEM analysis identified KM competencies as the strongest predictor of EBP implementation, with a direct effect (B = 0.86, p < 0.001) accounting for 86% of the total effect. EBP leadership significantly influenced EBP implementation both directly (β = 0.31, p = 0.02) and indirectly through KM competencies (B = 0.89, p < 0.001). Organizational support showed a minimal direct effect (B = 0.13, p < 0.05) and a slightly negative indirect effect through KM competencies (B = -0.10, p < 0.001).

Linking evidence to action: KM competencies are critical for EBP implementation, mediating the effects of leadership and organizational support. Healthcare organizations should enhance nurse managers' KM skills, foster transformational leadership, and create supportive environments. Future research should address barriers and explore longitudinal relationships in EBP implementation from a managerial perspective.

Background: Nursing well-being is foundational to the specialties workforce and broader healthcare industry worldwide. Despite frequent reports and descriptions of activities that support nurses' well-being, most reports describe singular activities and programs that lack science-based structures contextualized within academic healthcare systems (AHS) with validated impact.

Aims: To evaluate and synthesize the existing national and international literature on nurse well-being initiatives offered in AHS.

Methods: Over 18 months, an 8-member interprofessional team conducted a scoping review adhering to PRISMA-ScR reporting guidelines. Five databases were searched, and results were screened in a multistep process by researcher pairs. Discrepancies were resolved by a third team member's review. Citations were reviewed uniquely three times to ensure methodological rigor. A final set of 54 articles was extracted for key data elements pertinent to the research question describing setting, population, study design, intervention, and other subsidiary fields. Reviewers additionally analyzed publication quality indicators and trends for additional implications for research and practice.

Results: Among the 54 eligible articles, 72% were research and 28% were evidence-based practice, quality improvement, or doctoral dissertations. The concepts studied were psychosocial (e.g., resiliency) and physical (e.g., sleep). The number of instruments used per study ranged from 1 to 11. Thirty percent of studies utilized a framework from various disciplines that included nursing, social and behavioral sciences, and safety science principles. Nurses were included as authors 67% of the time, and 35% received funding from either the public or private sector.

Background: The mental health and well-being of nurses are critical issues in health care, particularly following the increased stressors introduced by the COVID-19 pandemic. Nurses frequently experience burnout, stress, and emotional exhaustion due to systemic issues such as staffing shortages, heavy workloads, and limited access to mental health resources. These challenges not only affect nurses' well-being but also impact the quality of patient care. Organizational support plays a pivotal role in mitigating these issues, yet the lived experiences of nurses regarding such support remain underexplored.

Aim: This Study Aimed to Explore Nurses' Lived Experiences of Organizational Support and Its Impact on Their Mental Health Recovery, With a Focus on Identifying Actionable Strategies for Improvement.

Methods: A qualitative phenomenological approach was employed, using Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis (IPA) to gain deep insights into nurses' experiences. Twenty nurses from various healthcare facilities in the Asir region, Saudi Arabia, were recruited through purposive sampling. Data were collected through face-to-face semi-structured interviews and analyzed using thematic analysis to identify recurring patterns and themes.

Results: Three main themes emerged: (1) Supportive Leadership, highlighting the critical role of empathetic and communicative leadership in fostering well-being; (2) Systemic Barriers, including staffing shortages, heavy workloads, and limited access to mental health resources; and (3) Workplace Wellness Culture, reflecting the influence of stigma, peer support, and the practicality of wellness programs on mental health recovery. These themes underscore the interconnected nature of leadership, systemic issues, and workplace culture in supporting nurses' mental health.

Linking evidence to action: The findings suggest several actionable strategies, including leadership training programs to foster empathy and communication, policies to address systemic barriers, tailored and accessible wellness programs, and initiatives to reduce mental health stigma. These interventions are essential for creating supportive environments that prioritize nurses' well-being and enhance their ability to deliver high-quality care.

Background: A skilled and diverse healthcare workforce is essential in nursing homes, yet recruitment and retention remain a major challenge. Gaining insight into the well-being of different care worker groups and how they perceive their work environment can highlight areas of concern and opportunities for improvement.

Aims: To compare the perceived work environment and well-being among different care worker groups in nursing homes.

Methods: This descriptive study used cross-sectional survey data from the Flanders Nursing Home (FLANH) project, collected from February-July 2023. A total of 1521 care workers from 25 Flemish nursing homes participated (64.4% response rate), including care assistants (43.7%), registered nurses (20.5%), support staff (15.4%), allied health professionals (14.8%), and team leaders (5.7%). Chi-squared tests were used to compare the percentages of the care worker groups reporting the work environment items and well-being outcomes (job satisfaction, intention to leave, burnout). Post hoc analyses were conducted to identify which groups contributed to the significant differences observed.

Results: Significant differences among care worker groups were found for almost all work environment items and well-being outcomes. Staffing adequacy was perceived least among care assistants and registered nurses. More registered nurses and team leaders perceived high workload and emotional burden compared to the other groups. Work-life interference and involvement were perceived most among team leaders. A person-centered vision, work autonomy, and salary satisfaction were reported most among allied health professionals and team leaders. Skill use and training opportunities were reported least among support staff. Work-related well-being appeared to be experienced most among allied health professionals and least among care assistants.

Linking evidence to action: These findings highlight key differences in work environment perceptions and well-being among care worker groups, offering valuable insights for tailored initiatives to foster a supportive workplace that benefits the well-being of all types of care workers in nursing homes.

Background: Evidence-based practice (EBP) should be implemented in clinical settings and practiced by registered nurses as it improves healthcare quality, safety, costs, and patient outcomes. For this to occur, nurses need to be skilled and acculturated. An EBP culture needs to be developed and sustained, both in initial academic programs and in clinical settings. Implementation models already exist and are being used, but outcomes are not consistently measured.

Aims: The aim of this scoping review was to gather and map the use of EBP implementation models as well as their implementation strategies and outcomes.

Method: The methodology for the JBI Scoping Reviews was applied. The databases queried were PubMed, CINAHL, EMBASE, EMCARE, AMED, BNI, HMIC, PsycInfo. Inclusion criteria were as follows: Any primary study that describes the implementation of EBP in nursing, clinical, or academic settings. Studies using the following EBP implementation models were included: the ARCC Model, ARCC-E Model, IOWA Model, Stetler Model, Johns Hopkins Nursing EBP Model, ACE Star Model as well as PARIHS and i-PARIHS. They must have used Proctor's taxonomy for implementation outcomes as well as described implementation strategies according to the ERIC classification. Data extraction was performed by four independent reviewers in February 2024. There was no language or date limitation. Three independent reviewers performed an initial selection on titles and abstracts. Reading of the full texts was carried out by two independent reviewers using the JBI SUMARI.

Results: A total of 2244 articles were retrieved. After removing duplicates and applying the inclusion criteria, 26 articles were reviewed, and data extracted. The most used implementation model was the PARiHS or i-PARiHS model followed by the IOWA model, the ARCC model combined with the JHNEBP model and the Stetler model. Nearly all studies used the implementation strategy domain "Use evaluative and iterative strategies" of ERIC classification. Overall, the selected studies used between 1 and 2 outcomes from Proctor's eight available.

Linking evidence to action: The underuse of existing taxonomies (Proctor, ERIC) prevents an exhaustive mapping of the use of implementation models. The vocabulary used is too vague, and the implementation strategies are sometimes poorly described. An effort needs to be made to report on all work done to transfer the results to other settings and thus improve health care practices.

Background: Work wellbeing, also known as workplace wellbeing, is a global concern for nurses, particularly because excessive stress and exhaustion contribute to burnout.

Objective: The Caring Science International Collaborative (CSIC), an international research network, empirically investigates nurse work wellbeing using the Profile of Caring, a psychometrically validated and reliable instrument.

Framework: The CSIC framework defines wellbeing intrinsically-as caring and clarity-and extrinsically-as the social and technical resources needed to work efficiently and effectively. The Profile of Caring explains 80% of work wellbeing in nursing without bias across 10 countries.

Study design: This research protocol describes an international multicenter observational study that measures nurse work wellbeing using the Profile of Caring and other concepts and outcomes measures.