<p>(3012) <b><i>Serissa</i></b> Comm. ex Juss., Gen. Pl.: 209. 4 Aug 1789 [<i>Rub</i>.], nom. cons. prop.</p> <p>Typus: <i>S. foetida</i> (L. f.) Poir. (in Lamarck, Tabl. Encycl. 2: 211. 31 Oct 1819) (<i>Lycium foetidum</i> L. f.).</p> <p>(=) <b><i>Buchozia</i></b> L'Hér., Buchozia: ad t. [1]. Aug–Dec 1788, nom. rej. prop.</p> <p>Typus: <i>B. coprosmoides</i> L'Hér., nom. illeg. (<i>Lycium japonicum</i> Thunb.; <i>B. japonica</i> (Thunb.) Callm.).</p> <p><i>Serissa</i> is a genus of one or perhaps two species naturally occurring in China, Japan, Nepal and Vietnam (Chen & Taylor in Wu & Raven, Fl. China 19: 323–324. 2011). <i>Serissa japonica</i> (Thunb.) Thunb. is very extensively cultivated worldwide as a bonsai subject, especially valued for its delicate branching, rough grey bark, numerous dainty flowers throughout the year and, in some cultivars, variegated foliage and/or “double” flowers. In China, <i>Serissa</i> has been cultivated as bonsai at least since 1591 in the Ming Dynasty (Gao, Eight Discourses on Respecting Life [in Chinese]. 1591). The earliest Japanese horticultural record dates back to 1695 (Ito Ihei, Book Glorious Colours Gardens [in Japanese]. 1695). In addition, the plant has been used in traditional Chinese medicine (e.g., for the treatment of ulcers and diarrhoea) for over 1200 years (Chen, Suppl. Materia Medica [in Chinese]. 739). Recent nomenclatural research (Lack & al. in Candollea 76: 145–165. 2021) has revealed that the generic name <i>Buchozia</i> is an earlier validly published name for the genus that is today universally known in horticulture as <i>Serissa</i>. Strict application of the principle of priority would necessitate the adoption of <i>Buchozia</i>. The overlooked name <i>Buchozia</i> has only very lately been unearthed whereas <i>Serissa</i> is a name used for over 230 years in both botanical and horticultural literature and is the Latin name used by bonsai enthusiasts, plant nurseries and E-commerce platforms.</p> <div><i>Serissa</i> was formally described by Jussieu (Gen. Pl.: 209. 1789) but ascribed to Philibert Commerson, who collected a cultivated <i>S. japonica</i> plant in an unknown locality (likely Mauritius). The etymology of the name may be derived from an Indian vernacular name: although Commerson never travelled to India, he botanised extensively in Mauritius where a substantial Indian population exists and may have brought the plant to Mauritius. Commerson might have used the name <i>Serissa</i> owing to its superficial resemblance to <i>Carissa</i> L. (<i>Apocynaceae</i>), which is based on the Sanskrit name <i>corissa</i>. Because the protologue includes a reference to “Lycio foetido LS.”, the type of the previously published name <i>Lycium foetidum</i> L. f. (Suppl. Pl.: 150. 1782) is definitely included. Therefore, the type of <i>Serissa</i> is the type of <i>L. foetidum</i>. Poiret (in Lamarck, Tabl. Encycl. 2: 211. 1819) subsequently made the new combination <i>Serissa foe
tropicos.org/Project/Madagascar）和邱园生命之树探索者（Kew Tree of Life Explorer）(https://treeoflife.kew.org/)，在Buchozia L'Hér.的年代被明确之后。据商业研究洞察（https://www.businessresearchinsights.com/）估计，2022年全球盆景市场规模超过80亿美元，预计2028年将达到158亿美元。作为最受欢迎的室内盆景之一，Serissa 的业务规模肯定很大。为了最终用户命名的稳定性，我们建议对这种具有重要园艺价值的植物保留广泛使用的名称 Serissa，而不是 Buchozia。
{"title":"(3012) Proposal to conserve the name Serissa against Buchozia (Rubiaceae)","authors":"Junhao Chen, Ming‐Fai Liu, Bine Xue, Lek Kheng Phua, Keow Wah Lim","doi":"10.1002/tax.13113","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/tax.13113","url":null,"abstract":"<p>(3012) <b><i>Serissa</i></b> Comm. ex Juss., Gen. Pl.: 209. 4 Aug 1789 [<i>Rub</i>.], nom. cons. prop.</p>\u0000<p>Typus: <i>S. foetida</i> (L. f.) Poir. (in Lamarck, Tabl. Encycl. 2: 211. 31 Oct 1819) (<i>Lycium foetidum</i> L. f.).</p>\u0000<p>(=) <b><i>Buchozia</i></b> L'Hér., Buchozia: ad t. [1]. Aug–Dec 1788, nom. rej. prop.</p>\u0000<p>Typus: <i>B. coprosmoides</i> L'Hér., nom. illeg. (<i>Lycium japonicum</i> Thunb.; <i>B. japonica</i> (Thunb.) Callm.).</p>\u0000<p><i>Serissa</i> is a genus of one or perhaps two species naturally occurring in China, Japan, Nepal and Vietnam (Chen & Taylor in Wu & Raven, Fl. China 19: 323–324. 2011). <i>Serissa japonica</i> (Thunb.) Thunb. is very extensively cultivated worldwide as a bonsai subject, especially valued for its delicate branching, rough grey bark, numerous dainty flowers throughout the year and, in some cultivars, variegated foliage and/or “double” flowers. In China, <i>Serissa</i> has been cultivated as bonsai at least since 1591 in the Ming Dynasty (Gao, Eight Discourses on Respecting Life [in Chinese]. 1591). The earliest Japanese horticultural record dates back to 1695 (Ito Ihei, Book Glorious Colours Gardens [in Japanese]. 1695). In addition, the plant has been used in traditional Chinese medicine (e.g., for the treatment of ulcers and diarrhoea) for over 1200 years (Chen, Suppl. Materia Medica [in Chinese]. 739). Recent nomenclatural research (Lack & al. in Candollea 76: 145–165. 2021) has revealed that the generic name <i>Buchozia</i> is an earlier validly published name for the genus that is today universally known in horticulture as <i>Serissa</i>. Strict application of the principle of priority would necessitate the adoption of <i>Buchozia</i>. The overlooked name <i>Buchozia</i> has only very lately been unearthed whereas <i>Serissa</i> is a name used for over 230 years in both botanical and horticultural literature and is the Latin name used by bonsai enthusiasts, plant nurseries and E-commerce platforms.</p>\u0000<div><i>Serissa</i> was formally described by Jussieu (Gen. Pl.: 209. 1789) but ascribed to Philibert Commerson, who collected a cultivated <i>S. japonica</i> plant in an unknown locality (likely Mauritius). The etymology of the name may be derived from an Indian vernacular name: although Commerson never travelled to India, he botanised extensively in Mauritius where a substantial Indian population exists and may have brought the plant to Mauritius. Commerson might have used the name <i>Serissa</i> owing to its superficial resemblance to <i>Carissa</i> L. (<i>Apocynaceae</i>), which is based on the Sanskrit name <i>corissa</i>. Because the protologue includes a reference to “Lycio foetido LS.”, the type of the previously published name <i>Lycium foetidum</i> L. f. (Suppl. Pl.: 150. 1782) is definitely included. Therefore, the type of <i>Serissa</i> is the type of <i>L. foetidum</i>. Poiret (in Lamarck, Tabl. Encycl. 2: 211. 1819) subsequently made the new combination <i>Serissa foe","PeriodicalId":49448,"journal":{"name":"Taxon","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2024-02-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139948086","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Lucas Vieira Lima, Thaís Elias Almeida, Michael Kessler, Germinal Rouhan, Alexandre Salino
<p>(3006) <b><i>Sticherus</i></b> C. Presl [Tent. Pterid.] in Abh. Königl. Böhm. Ges. Wiss., ser. 4, 5: 51. 1836 (ante 2 Dec), nom. cons. prop.</p> <p>Typus: <i>S. gracilis</i> (Mart.) Copel. (Gen. Fil.: 27. 1947) (<i>Mertensia gracilis</i> Mart.), typ. cons. prop.</p> <p><i>Sticherus</i> is the largest genus in <i>Gleicheniaceae</i>, comprising about 95 recognized species (Gonzales & Kessler in Phytotaxa 31: 1–54. 2011; PPG I in J. Syst. Evol. 54: 563–603. 2016; Lima & Salino in Phytotaxa 358: 199–234. 2018). It is found in the tropics of Africa, Asia, Oceania, and the Americas, with the latter area harboring the majority of the species (Holttum in Fl. Males., Ser. 2, Pterid. 1: 1–36. 1959; Gonzales & Kessler, l.c.; PPG I, l.c.). The genus was established by Presl (Tent. Pterid.: 51–52. 1836) and initially included two species: <i>Sticherus laevigatus</i> (Willd.) C. Presl and <i>S. laniger</i> (D. Don) C. Presl. However, the latter species is now widely recognized not to belong to <i>Sticherus</i> (Pichi-Sermolli in Webbia 26: 491–536. 1973) and is currently included in <i>Dicranopteris</i> (Fraser-Jenkins, Taxon. Revis. Indian Subcont. Pterid.: 35. 2008). <i>Sticherus</i> was first typified by Pfeiffer (Nomencl. Bot. 2: 1285. 1874), who designated <i>S. laevigatus</i> (<i>Mertensia laevigata</i> Willd., Sp. Pl. 5: 75. 1810) as type. Christensen (Index Filic.: LIV, 627. 1906) originally included <i>Sticherus</i> within <i>Gleichenia</i> sect. <i>Holopterygium</i> Diels, when adopting a monogeneric classification for <i>Gleicheniaceae</i>, but, subsequently (in Verdoorn, Man. Pterid.: 530. 1938) he recognized <i>Sticherus</i> in his classification system, now with five genera for <i>Gleicheniaceae</i>, and also adopted <i>S. laevigatus</i> as the type of the generic name.</p> <p><i>Sticherus laevigatus</i> has been widely treated as a synonym of <i>S. truncatus</i> (Willd.) Nakai (e.g., Holttum, l.c.; Pichi-Sermolli, l.c.: 524; Gonzales & Kessler, l.c.), based on <i>Mertensia truncata</i> Willd. (in Kongl. Vetensk. Acad. Nya Handl. 25: 169. 1804) an earlier name than <i>M. laevigata</i> Willd. The first author carefully reviewed the original elements of these two species in Willdenow's collection housed at B (B -W 19470 -01 0 and B -W 19471 -01 0), also confirming without any doubt the synonymy.</p> <p>Species delimitation within <i>Sticherus</i> is complex, primarily based on the indumentum and secondarily on blade architecture and rhizome features. The genus underwent revision by Gonzales & Kessler (l.c.) and was later revisited by Lima & Salino (l.c.) and Lima & al. (in review). The same authors (Lima & al. in Molec. Phylogen. Evol. 184: 107782. 2023), in a phylogenomic study with an extensive geographic sampling of the genus, found <i>Sticherus</i> to be paraphyletic. In that study, the genus forms two clades, <i>Sticherus</i> s.str., including <i>S. laevigatus</i>, the type of the generic name, and <i>S. miln
(3006) Sticherus C. Presl [Tent. Pterid.] in Abh.Königl.Böhm.Ges.Wiss.1836 (ante 2 Dec), nom：S. gracilis (Mart.) Copel.(1947) (Mertensia gracilis Mart.), typ.2011; PPG I in J. Syst.54: 563-603.2016; Lima & Salino in Phytotaxa 358：199-234.2018).它分布于非洲、亚洲、大洋洲和美洲的热带地区，美洲是该物种的主要栖息地（Holttum in Fl.Males.1: 1-36.1959; Gonzales & Kessler, l.c.; PPG I, l.c.）。Pterid.: 51-52. 1836），最初包括两个种：Sticherus laevigatus (Willd.) C. Presl 和 S. laniger (D. Don) C. Presl。然而，后者现在被广泛认为不属于 Sticherus (Pichi-Sermolli in Webbia 26: 491-536. 1973) 并且目前被归入 Dicranopteris (Fraser-Jenkins, Taxon. Revis. Indian Subcont. Pterid.: 35. 2008)。laevigatus (Mertensia laevigata Willd., Sp. Pl. 5: 75. 1810) 为模式标本。Christensen (Index Filic.: LIV, 627. 1906) 最初将 Sticherus 包括在 Gleichenia sect 内。Holopterygium Diels，当采用 Gleicheniaceae 的单属分类时，但后来（在 Verdoorn，Man. Pterid.: 530. 1938 年）他在他的分类系统中承认了 Sticherus，现在 Gleicheniaceae 有 5 属，也采用 S. laevigatus 作为属名的模式、Holttum, l.c.; Pichi-Sermolli, l.c.: 524; Gonzales & Kessler, l.c.), based on Mertensia truncata Willd. (in Kongl. Vetensk. Acad. Nya Handl. 25: 169. 1804) an early name than M. laevigata Willd.第一作者仔细审查了保存在 B 的 Willdenow 的收藏中的这两个种的原始元素（B -W 19470 -01 0 和 B -W 19471 -01 0），也毫无疑问地确认了同义。Sticherus 内的物种划分很复杂，主要基于毛被，其次基于叶片结构和根茎特征。Gonzales & Kessler（l.c.）对该属进行了修订，随后 Lima & Salino（l.c.）和 Lima & al.（综述中）对其进行了重新审视。同一位作者（Lima & al. in Molec. Phylogen. Evol. 184: 107782. 2023）在对该属进行广泛地理取样的系统发生组学研究中，发现 Sticherus 属为旁系。在该研究中，该属形成了两个支系，即 Sticherus s.str.支系，包括 S. laevigatus（该属名的模式种）和 S. milnei (Baker) Ching，它们是由 Stromatopteris 和 Gleichenia 组成的更大支系的姐妹支系，而后者又是其余 Sticherus 种的姐妹支系（此处称为 Sticherus 亲缘支系；Lima & al., l.c. 2023）。分歧时间估计表明，Sticherus s.str.与 Gleichenia + Stromatopteris + aff.Sticherus 支系的分裂发生在距今约 1.14-1.17 亿年前，后者与 Stromatopteris 和 Gleichenia 的分化发生在距今约 1.11-1.13 亿年前（Lima & al.）Sticherus s.str.的特征是具有异轴分支模式，而 Sticherus aff.Sticherus 支系中的物种则具有同位分支模式。Sticherus 支系中的物种则具有同分枝模式。Sticherus s.str.支系（S. laevigatus, S. milnei）仅分布于澳大拉西亚（Holttum, l.c.; Chinnock & Bell in Fl.澳大利亚 48: 148-162.1998; Gonzales & Kessler, l.c.; PPG I, l.c.）。要实现单系属，必须将这两个支系视为不同的属。根据 ICN 的原则，Sticherus 这一名称将适用于 Sticherus s.str. 支系，包括两个种（S. laevigatus、S. milnei）。由于没有其他可用的属名可以容纳其余的 Sticherus 种，因此有必要建立一个新的属名，并将 95 个种名合并为这个新属。另一个选择是保留 Sticherus 这一名称，并将其与濒危物种 Sticherus 支系中的一个物种放在一起，并对其进行描述。S.laevigatus，以及 S. milnei。Sticherus 的用法在不同的植物区系中已被广泛接受，包括玻利维亚（Kessler & Smith 在 Phytotaxa 344: 053-063. 2018）、巴西（Lima & Salino, l.c.）、哥伦比亚（Murillo-P. & al.Pl.Liquenes Colombia: 158-166.2016), Mexico (Mickel & Smith, Pterid. Mexico: 604-607. 2004), Africa (Roux in Strelitzia 23: 50. 2009), and Australia (Chinnock & Bell, l.c.).此外，这些 "aff.
{"title":"(3006) Proposal to conserve the name Sticherus (Gleicheniaceae) with a conserved type","authors":"Lucas Vieira Lima, Thaís Elias Almeida, Michael Kessler, Germinal Rouhan, Alexandre Salino","doi":"10.1002/tax.13119","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/tax.13119","url":null,"abstract":"<p>(3006) <b><i>Sticherus</i></b> C. Presl [Tent. Pterid.] in Abh. Königl. Böhm. Ges. Wiss., ser. 4, 5: 51. 1836 (ante 2 Dec), nom. cons. prop.</p>\u0000<p>Typus: <i>S. gracilis</i> (Mart.) Copel. (Gen. Fil.: 27. 1947) (<i>Mertensia gracilis</i> Mart.), typ. cons. prop.</p>\u0000<p><i>Sticherus</i> is the largest genus in <i>Gleicheniaceae</i>, comprising about 95 recognized species (Gonzales & Kessler in Phytotaxa 31: 1–54. 2011; PPG I in J. Syst. Evol. 54: 563–603. 2016; Lima & Salino in Phytotaxa 358: 199–234. 2018). It is found in the tropics of Africa, Asia, Oceania, and the Americas, with the latter area harboring the majority of the species (Holttum in Fl. Males., Ser. 2, Pterid. 1: 1–36. 1959; Gonzales & Kessler, l.c.; PPG I, l.c.). The genus was established by Presl (Tent. Pterid.: 51–52. 1836) and initially included two species: <i>Sticherus laevigatus</i> (Willd.) C. Presl and <i>S. laniger</i> (D. Don) C. Presl. However, the latter species is now widely recognized not to belong to <i>Sticherus</i> (Pichi-Sermolli in Webbia 26: 491–536. 1973) and is currently included in <i>Dicranopteris</i> (Fraser-Jenkins, Taxon. Revis. Indian Subcont. Pterid.: 35. 2008). <i>Sticherus</i> was first typified by Pfeiffer (Nomencl. Bot. 2: 1285. 1874), who designated <i>S. laevigatus</i> (<i>Mertensia laevigata</i> Willd., Sp. Pl. 5: 75. 1810) as type. Christensen (Index Filic.: LIV, 627. 1906) originally included <i>Sticherus</i> within <i>Gleichenia</i> sect. <i>Holopterygium</i> Diels, when adopting a monogeneric classification for <i>Gleicheniaceae</i>, but, subsequently (in Verdoorn, Man. Pterid.: 530. 1938) he recognized <i>Sticherus</i> in his classification system, now with five genera for <i>Gleicheniaceae</i>, and also adopted <i>S. laevigatus</i> as the type of the generic name.</p>\u0000<p><i>Sticherus laevigatus</i> has been widely treated as a synonym of <i>S. truncatus</i> (Willd.) Nakai (e.g., Holttum, l.c.; Pichi-Sermolli, l.c.: 524; Gonzales & Kessler, l.c.), based on <i>Mertensia truncata</i> Willd. (in Kongl. Vetensk. Acad. Nya Handl. 25: 169. 1804) an earlier name than <i>M. laevigata</i> Willd. The first author carefully reviewed the original elements of these two species in Willdenow's collection housed at B (B -W 19470 -01 0 and B -W 19471 -01 0), also confirming without any doubt the synonymy.</p>\u0000<p>Species delimitation within <i>Sticherus</i> is complex, primarily based on the indumentum and secondarily on blade architecture and rhizome features. The genus underwent revision by Gonzales & Kessler (l.c.) and was later revisited by Lima & Salino (l.c.) and Lima & al. (in review). The same authors (Lima & al. in Molec. Phylogen. Evol. 184: 107782. 2023), in a phylogenomic study with an extensive geographic sampling of the genus, found <i>Sticherus</i> to be paraphyletic. In that study, the genus forms two clades, <i>Sticherus</i> s.str., including <i>S. laevigatus</i>, the type of the generic name, and <i>S. miln","PeriodicalId":49448,"journal":{"name":"Taxon","volume":"41 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2024-02-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139948144","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Marcelo Simon, Tania Moura, Domingos Cardoso, Patrick Herendeen
<p>The 8th International Legume Conference (8ILC, www.8ilc.com) took place from 6th to 11th August 2023 in Pirenópolis, Brazil, one of the most charming towns in the heart of the savanna landscapes of the Cerrado biodiversity hotspot. The ILC is a series of international conferences focused on the legume family. It encompasses a wide range of topics, including but not limited to systematics, evolution, biogeography, morphology, ecology, biological nitrogen fixation, and genomics. Although this event was inaugurated in 1978, it does not adhere to a set periodic schedule; in recent years, however, it has been convened approximately every five years. For the first time, the ILC was held in Brazil, a country renowned for its extraordinary biological and cultural diversity, and home to a vibrant community of legume researchers. The International Association for Plant Taxonomy (IAPT), reaffirming its commitment to fostering global taxonomy and systematics, was among the 8ILC sponsors.</p> <p>Since its inception, the ILC has firmly established itself as a prominent international meeting, attracting a diverse and extensive participation of researchers from various countries and continents, as well as a remarkable presence of students. By fostering global collaboration among researchers, well exemplified by the formation of the Legume Phylogeny Working Group (LPWG), the ILC is a welcoming environment in which new scientifically exciting ideas and advances in the legume family arise. For example, the 6ILC in 2013 in Johannesburg, South Africa, set the stage for establishing the new phylogeny-based subfamily-level classification of the Leguminosae. The extensive discussions on the new legume classification that emerged during the 6ILC were the basis for the publication of two papers in <i>Taxon</i> in 2013 and 2017, under the auspices of the LPWG: (1) a review paper discussing the progress made to date in the molecular systematics and the need for a revised classification of the family (LPWG, 2013: https://doi.org/10.12705/622.8), and (2) the new subfamily-level classification (LPWG, 2017: https://doi.org/10.12705/661.3). Since its publication in early 2017, the LPWG's new classification of legumes at the subfamily level has become successful not only in the legume community. Its impact across plant science is demonstrated by the fact that it has already reached the landmark of becoming the second-most cited paper ever published in <i>Taxon</i>.</p> <p>The 8ILC in Pirenópolis was centered around the theme of “Integrating Knowledge on the Legume Family”. At the Opening Ceremony on 6th August, Marcelo Simon (Chairperson of the 8ILC) addressed the conference by welcoming all delegates. Then, Professor Fabio Scarano (Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro) delivered the opening keynote talk “Legumes and futures: Dialogues between different ways of knowing”.</p> <p>The global legume community was well represented, with 147 participants hailing from 18 countries,
8ILC 组委会利用在巴西举办会议的机会，向七位巴西豆科植物研究人员致敬，他们是：Ana Maria Goulart de Azevedo Tozzi（坎皮纳斯州立大学）、Angela Maria Studart da Fonseca Vaz（里约热内卢植物园）、Haroldo Cavalcante de Lima（里约热内卢植物园）、José Francisco Montenegro Valls（巴西农业研究公司）、Luciano Paganucci de Queiroz（费拉-德-桑塔纳州立大学）、Marli Pires Morim（里约热内卢植物园）和 Silvia Teresinha Sfoggia Miotto（南里奥格兰德州联邦大学），他们在职业生涯中发表了大量有关豆科植物系统学和系统发育学的论文，并通过教学和指导下一代豆科植物科学家，为增进豆科植物的知识做出了重要贡献。其中两位研究人员在其职业生涯中分别收集了 4000 多件豆科植物藏品，一位甚至超过了 5000 件，跻身巴西现存六大豆科植物收藏家之列。另外三位采集者Glocimar Pereira da Silva（Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária）、Maria Lenise Silva Guedes（Universidade Federal da Bahia）和Vinicius Castro Souza（Universidade de São Paulo/ESALQ）也在特别仪式上受到了表彰，他们每人采集了3000多个豆科植物编号。第八届国际土地科学会议还专门举办了一次研讨会，纪念全球豆科植物结核研究权威珍妮特-斯普伦特（Janet Sprent）的职业生涯。与会者有机会在一次郊游中放松身心，欣赏自然保护区的美景，在独特的塞拉多（Cerrado）植被中漫步，观察巴西植物区系中许多具有重要生态意义和/或特有的豆科植物物种，并在飞流直下的瀑布下畅游。在闭幕式之前，会议就易廷双教授和托比-彭宁顿教授分别提出的在中国昆明或苏格兰爱丁堡举办第九届国际土地科学大会的建议展开了讨论。虽然在皮诺波利斯会议期间没有达成最终决定，但我们都对几年后的重聚感到兴奋，因为我们将更深入地研究豆科植物科学的前沿领域。总之，第八届国际土地科学大会取得了巨大成功，来自世界各地的人们汇聚一堂，有机会面对面交流，展示突破性的科学研究成果，并建立新的联系与合作。在第 8 届国际植物学大会上发表的部分论文将作为《豆科植物系统学进展》（第 15 卷）丛书的一部分，该丛书将于 2024 年初作为《巴西植物学杂志》的特刊出版 (https://www.springer.com/journal/40415/updates/24622142)。
{"title":"Eighth International Legume Conference, Pirenópolis, Brazil, August 2023","authors":"Marcelo Simon, Tania Moura, Domingos Cardoso, Patrick Herendeen","doi":"10.1002/tax.13111","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/tax.13111","url":null,"abstract":"<p>The 8th International Legume Conference (8ILC, www.8ilc.com) took place from 6th to 11th August 2023 in Pirenópolis, Brazil, one of the most charming towns in the heart of the savanna landscapes of the Cerrado biodiversity hotspot. The ILC is a series of international conferences focused on the legume family. It encompasses a wide range of topics, including but not limited to systematics, evolution, biogeography, morphology, ecology, biological nitrogen fixation, and genomics. Although this event was inaugurated in 1978, it does not adhere to a set periodic schedule; in recent years, however, it has been convened approximately every five years. For the first time, the ILC was held in Brazil, a country renowned for its extraordinary biological and cultural diversity, and home to a vibrant community of legume researchers. The International Association for Plant Taxonomy (IAPT), reaffirming its commitment to fostering global taxonomy and systematics, was among the 8ILC sponsors.</p>\u0000<p>Since its inception, the ILC has firmly established itself as a prominent international meeting, attracting a diverse and extensive participation of researchers from various countries and continents, as well as a remarkable presence of students. By fostering global collaboration among researchers, well exemplified by the formation of the Legume Phylogeny Working Group (LPWG), the ILC is a welcoming environment in which new scientifically exciting ideas and advances in the legume family arise. For example, the 6ILC in 2013 in Johannesburg, South Africa, set the stage for establishing the new phylogeny-based subfamily-level classification of the Leguminosae. The extensive discussions on the new legume classification that emerged during the 6ILC were the basis for the publication of two papers in <i>Taxon</i> in 2013 and 2017, under the auspices of the LPWG: (1) a review paper discussing the progress made to date in the molecular systematics and the need for a revised classification of the family (LPWG, 2013: https://doi.org/10.12705/622.8), and (2) the new subfamily-level classification (LPWG, 2017: https://doi.org/10.12705/661.3). Since its publication in early 2017, the LPWG's new classification of legumes at the subfamily level has become successful not only in the legume community. Its impact across plant science is demonstrated by the fact that it has already reached the landmark of becoming the second-most cited paper ever published in <i>Taxon</i>.</p>\u0000<p>The 8ILC in Pirenópolis was centered around the theme of “Integrating Knowledge on the Legume Family”. At the Opening Ceremony on 6th August, Marcelo Simon (Chairperson of the 8ILC) addressed the conference by welcoming all delegates. Then, Professor Fabio Scarano (Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro) delivered the opening keynote talk “Legumes and futures: Dialogues between different ways of knowing”.</p>\u0000<p>The global legume community was well represented, with 147 participants hailing from 18 countries,","PeriodicalId":49448,"journal":{"name":"Taxon","volume":"31 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2024-02-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139953303","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
<p>(3008) <b><i>Philodendron chanchamayense</i></b> Engl. in Bot. Jahrb. Syst. 37: 125. 19 Sep 1905 (‘<i>chinchamayense</i>’) [Angiosp.: <i>Ar</i>.], orth. cons. prop.</p> <p>Typus: Peru, Dep. Junín, Prov. Tarma, La Merced im Chanchamayo-Thal, lichter Wald, 1000 m, Dec 1902, <i>Weberbauer 1864</i> (B).</p> <p>The binomial referenced in the title of this proposal has long been accepted for a species of <i>Philodendron</i> subg. <i>Pteromischum</i> (Schott) Mayo, widespread in the western portion of the Amazon basin in South America, and distinctive morphologically by virtue of its relatively short-petiolate and narrow leaves with conspicuous (at least in dried material) blackish resin canals. The correct spelling of its epithet, however, has been a bone of contention. The name <i>Philodendron chinchamayense</i> (with that spelling) was validated by Adolf Engler (in Bot. Jahrb. Syst. 37: 125. 1905) based on a single specimen collected three years previously by his countryman August Weberbauer “im Chanchamoyo-Tal” (as cited by Engler), Peru. Although Engler did not specify the etymology of his epithet in an explicit manner, he must certainly have based it on the type locality, orthography notwithstanding. Engler's usage of two different spellings is prima facie evidence of an orthographical (if not a typographical) error, because both cannot be correct. In fact, as it turns out, both versions are erroneous: the Peruvian place-name (referring to a river, a town, a district, and a province) on which the epithet of this species must have been based is correctly spelled “Chanchamayo”, and was so spelled even in Engler's time (“Chanchamayo-Thal” is handwritten quite legibly on the label of Weberbauer's type specimen). The Chanchamayo River valley has attained wide repute even outside Peru as a premier coffee-growing region. I have been unable to find any evidence that the spellings “Chinchamayo” or “Chanchamoyo” have ever been used by anyone other than Engler (although “Chanchamayu”, a historic Quechua spelling, persists on a minor scale).</p> <p>The <i>Code</i> (Art. 60.1; Turland & al. in Regnum Veg. 159. 2018) allows for “the correction of typographical or orthographical errors”, one or the other of which <i>Philodendron chinchamayense</i> is a clear example. According to Art. 60.3, “The liberty of correcting a name is to be used with reserve, especially if the change affects the first syllable and, above all, the first letter of the name”; nevertheless, several conflicting examples are condoned, e.g., those of <i>Agaricus rhacodes</i> Vittad. (Art. 60 Ex. 2), <i>Globba trachycarpa</i> Baker (Ex. 3), and <i>Gluta renghas</i> L. (Ex. 6). As far as I have been able to establish, the first author to correct Engler's <i>P. chinchamayense</i> to <i>P. chanchamayense</i> was Weberbauer himself (in Engler & Drude, Veg. Erde 12: 282. 1911), who did so without comment in an enumeration of plant species from the “Chanchamayo-Tal”. Shortly thereafter, ho
尽管我有此意图，但在过去 25 年中，趋势已经发生了变化，大多数相关出版物选择保留恩格勒的原始拼法：例如，Kessler & Croat (in Selbyana 20: 232. 1999, Govaerts & Frodin (World Checkl、Kessler & Croat (in Selbyana 20: 232. 1999), Govaerts & Frodin (World Checkl. Bibliogr. Araceae: 381. 2002), de la Torre & al. (Encicl. Pl. Útiles Ecuador: 187. 2008), Croat & Acebey (in Monogr. Syst. Bot. Missouri Bot. Gard. 127: 263. 2014), and Galeano & al. (in Bernal & al. Cat. Pl. Líquenes Colombia 1: 731. 2016)、Cat. Pl. Líquenes Colombia 1: 731. 2016）。拼写 "chanchamayense "在一些论文（Barbosa，Divers.Fl Est.Acre [Ph.D. thesis, Univ. Fed. Sta：］36, 110.2003, https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/30366076.pdf; Lingan Chavez, Araceae S.E. Peru [M.S. thesis, Texas Christian Univ.]：47, 58, 65, 67, 69. 2008, https://repository.tcu.edu/bitstream/handle/116099117/4079/lingan.pdf），但几个主要的在线数据库（IPNI、JSTOR 全球植物、Tropicos）目前只接受 P. chinchamayense，没有 P. chanchamayense 的结果。如果这还不够，谷歌搜索（截至 2023 年 10 月 26 日）返回的 P. chinchamayense 点击次数约为 3900 次，而 P. chanchamayense 仅有 9 次！如果我在 1996 年对这一名称的拼写法进行了与最近几周同样的考虑，我肯定会选择麦克布莱德的正确拼写法，因为在那之前，它一直占据着制高点。但在过去的四分之一个世纪里，情况发生了巨大变化，在此期间，恩格勒的原始拼写法已变得根深蒂固。因此，自动纠正恩格勒的错误已不再可能，正式保留正字法上正确的 chanchamayense 拼写成为唯一可行的选择，因此才有了现在的建议。无论如何，这主要是一个数据库问题；对农业部标本馆标本的调查显示，实物标注本身或多或少在 Philodendron chanchamayense 和 P. chinchamayense 之间平分秋色（仅考虑那些被正确确定为种的标本），有时第三个字母被手工划掉，并以某种方式 "更正"。一般来说，秘鲁收藏的标本倾向于前一种拼法，玻利维亚收藏的标本倾向于后一种拼法（该物种还分布于厄瓜多尔、哥伦比亚和巴西西部，这些地方经常使用不同的名称）。如果该建议获得批准，就没有必要对标本馆的标本进行全面的重新注释（尽管可以按照上 述思路进行小规模的手工修正）；只需要对一些主要数据库进行简单明了的调整即可。否决该建议将避免对数据库的调整（尽管不需要对标本注释进行手工修改），但将永远保 留物种名称的原始错误拼写，这对秘鲁生物学家来说肯定特别难以接受。Pteromischum subg. Pteromischum 的标准），但该物种并不以任何目的进行商业种植，在世界贸易中也没有经济价值（参见 Plowman in Econ. Bot. 23: 97-122. 1969），尽管厄瓜多尔的一些土著群体将其作为祭品使用（de la Torre & al.
{"title":"(3008) Proposal to conserve the name Philodendron chanchamayense (Araceae) with that spelling","authors":"Michael H. Grayum","doi":"10.1002/tax.13118","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/tax.13118","url":null,"abstract":"<p>(3008) <b><i>Philodendron chanchamayense</i></b> Engl. in Bot. Jahrb. Syst. 37: 125. 19 Sep 1905 (‘<i>chinchamayense</i>’) [Angiosp.: <i>Ar</i>.], orth. cons. prop.</p>\u0000<p>Typus: Peru, Dep. Junín, Prov. Tarma, La Merced im Chanchamayo-Thal, lichter Wald, 1000 m, Dec 1902, <i>Weberbauer 1864</i> (B).</p>\u0000<p>The binomial referenced in the title of this proposal has long been accepted for a species of <i>Philodendron</i> subg. <i>Pteromischum</i> (Schott) Mayo, widespread in the western portion of the Amazon basin in South America, and distinctive morphologically by virtue of its relatively short-petiolate and narrow leaves with conspicuous (at least in dried material) blackish resin canals. The correct spelling of its epithet, however, has been a bone of contention. The name <i>Philodendron chinchamayense</i> (with that spelling) was validated by Adolf Engler (in Bot. Jahrb. Syst. 37: 125. 1905) based on a single specimen collected three years previously by his countryman August Weberbauer “im Chanchamoyo-Tal” (as cited by Engler), Peru. Although Engler did not specify the etymology of his epithet in an explicit manner, he must certainly have based it on the type locality, orthography notwithstanding. Engler's usage of two different spellings is prima facie evidence of an orthographical (if not a typographical) error, because both cannot be correct. In fact, as it turns out, both versions are erroneous: the Peruvian place-name (referring to a river, a town, a district, and a province) on which the epithet of this species must have been based is correctly spelled “Chanchamayo”, and was so spelled even in Engler's time (“Chanchamayo-Thal” is handwritten quite legibly on the label of Weberbauer's type specimen). The Chanchamayo River valley has attained wide repute even outside Peru as a premier coffee-growing region. I have been unable to find any evidence that the spellings “Chinchamayo” or “Chanchamoyo” have ever been used by anyone other than Engler (although “Chanchamayu”, a historic Quechua spelling, persists on a minor scale).</p>\u0000<p>The <i>Code</i> (Art. 60.1; Turland & al. in Regnum Veg. 159. 2018) allows for “the correction of typographical or orthographical errors”, one or the other of which <i>Philodendron chinchamayense</i> is a clear example. According to Art. 60.3, “The liberty of correcting a name is to be used with reserve, especially if the change affects the first syllable and, above all, the first letter of the name”; nevertheless, several conflicting examples are condoned, e.g., those of <i>Agaricus rhacodes</i> Vittad. (Art. 60 Ex. 2), <i>Globba trachycarpa</i> Baker (Ex. 3), and <i>Gluta renghas</i> L. (Ex. 6). As far as I have been able to establish, the first author to correct Engler's <i>P. chinchamayense</i> to <i>P. chanchamayense</i> was Weberbauer himself (in Engler & Drude, Veg. Erde 12: 282. 1911), who did so without comment in an enumeration of plant species from the “Chanchamayo-Tal”. Shortly thereafter, ho","PeriodicalId":49448,"journal":{"name":"Taxon","volume":"31 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2024-02-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139956679","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
, Carmen Ulloa Ulloa, Nicholas J. Turland, Alina Freire-Fierro, Bin-Jie Ge, Josephine Milne, A. Muthama Muasya, Jarosław Proćków, Teresa Iturriaga
The Committee on Institutional Votes was established at the XIX International Botanical Congress (IBC), in Shenzhen in 2017, with the mandate to maintain a list of institutions and their allocated votes for the upcoming IBC, the next of which will be the XX IBC in Madrid in July 2024. Institutions worldwide were informed of the mechanism to apply for one or more institutional votes or to request a change in previously allocated votes. Forty applications were received by the Committee, of which 28 were from institutions new to the list, 9 requested an increase in allocated votes and 3 requested no change to allocated votes. All requests were accepted, two of them partly so. Adjustments were also made for two institutions that had been closed or transferred. The Committee sent a draft of this report together with the revised list for Madrid to the General Committee for final approval, as required by the International Code of Nomenclature for algae, fungi, and plants. The General Committee approved the list, which is now presented here. The total number of institutions on the list is 572; the total number of institutional votes that could potentially be exercised is 970. Only 30.4% of institutions exercised their votes in Shenzhen in 2017. Institutions are urged to exercise their votes in Madrid in 2024, and instructions for this are provided.
{"title":"Institutional Votes at the XX International Botanical Congress, Madrid, 2024: Report of the Committee on Institutional Votes","authors":", Carmen Ulloa Ulloa, Nicholas J. Turland, Alina Freire-Fierro, Bin-Jie Ge, Josephine Milne, A. Muthama Muasya, Jarosław Proćków, Teresa Iturriaga","doi":"10.1002/tax.13110","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/tax.13110","url":null,"abstract":"The Committee on Institutional Votes was established at the XIX International Botanical Congress (IBC), in Shenzhen in 2017, with the mandate to maintain a list of institutions and their allocated votes for the upcoming IBC, the next of which will be the XX IBC in Madrid in July 2024. Institutions worldwide were informed of the mechanism to apply for one or more institutional votes or to request a change in previously allocated votes. Forty applications were received by the Committee, of which 28 were from institutions new to the list, 9 requested an increase in allocated votes and 3 requested no change to allocated votes. All requests were accepted, two of them partly so. Adjustments were also made for two institutions that had been closed or transferred. The Committee sent a draft of this report together with the revised list for Madrid to the General Committee for final approval, as required by the <i>International Code of Nomenclature for algae, fungi, and plants</i>. The General Committee approved the list, which is now presented here. The total number of institutions on the list is 572; the total number of institutional votes that could potentially be exercised is 970. Only 30.4% of institutions exercised their votes in Shenzhen in 2017. Institutions are urged to exercise their votes in Madrid in 2024, and instructions for this are provided.","PeriodicalId":49448,"journal":{"name":"Taxon","volume":"22 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2024-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139948165","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Ze-Huan Wang, Yi Yang, Yi Wang, Li Chen, Fei Zhao, Yuan-Yuan Li
We describe a small population of remarkable plants found in Shuangjiang County, SW Yunnan, as Tuberowithania pengiana gen. & sp. nov., a unique genus within the subtribe Withaninae, tribe Physalideae of the Solanaceae family. The new genus and species feature a distinctive combination of morphological traits, including a large clumped tuberous root, urceolate and densely pubescent dark purplish flowers, densely pubescent purplish filaments, and yellowish-white, ovoid berries snugly covered by 10-ribbed accrescent calyx. Molecular phylogenetic analysis, based on a combined matrix of four DNA markers (nrITS, trnL-F, waxy, LFY), revealed that T. pengiana is deeply nested within the subtribe Withaninae. It forms a sister relationship with Archiphysalis chamaesarachoides, although with weak support.
{"title":"Tuberowithania pengiana (Withaninae, Physalideae, Solanaceae), a new species and genus from southwest Yunnan, China","authors":"Ze-Huan Wang, Yi Yang, Yi Wang, Li Chen, Fei Zhao, Yuan-Yuan Li","doi":"10.1002/tax.13143","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/tax.13143","url":null,"abstract":"We describe a small population of remarkable plants found in Shuangjiang County, SW Yunnan, as <i>Tuberowithania pengiana</i> gen. & sp. nov., a unique genus within the subtribe Withaninae, tribe Physalideae of the Solanaceae family. The new genus and species feature a distinctive combination of morphological traits, including a large clumped tuberous root, urceolate and densely pubescent dark purplish flowers, densely pubescent purplish filaments, and yellowish-white, ovoid berries snugly covered by 10-ribbed accrescent calyx. Molecular phylogenetic analysis, based on a combined matrix of four DNA markers (nrITS, <i>trnL-F</i>, <i>waxy</i>, <i>LFY</i>), revealed that <i>T. pengiana</i> is deeply nested within the subtribe Withaninae. It forms a sister relationship with <i>Archiphysalis chamaesarachoides</i>, although with weak support.","PeriodicalId":49448,"journal":{"name":"Taxon","volume":"18 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2024-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139917819","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
<p>On 2 December 2023, at the annual celebration of the foundation of the Royal Physiographic Society of Lund, Sweden, the Rolf and Gertrud Dahlgren Prize for 2023 was awarded to Louis Ronse De Craene, Royal Botanic Garden, Edinburgh. The Prize, inaugurated in 1988, is given every third year to a scientist who has made major contributions to botany in the broad-minded spirit of Rolf and Gertrud Dahlgren, particularly in the fields of systematics and evolution of the angiosperms, and regardless of their nationality. The prize-winner is chosen by active researchers in various fields of botany. Ronse De Craene has been awarded the prize for his work on floral development in a broad range of angiosperm families and the importance of floral morphology in the context of modern phylogenetic studies.</p> <p>Ronse De Craene was born in Kortrijk/Courtrai (Flemish Region of Belgium) in 1962. He obtained an M.Sc. at the University of Reading (U.K.) in 1986, with a thesis in which he proposed a clearer circumscription of the genus <i>Polygonum</i> based on floral morphological and anatomical characters. He received a doctorate at the Catholic University of Leuven (Belgium) in 1992 on a dissertation about the androecium of the angiosperms (<i>The androecium of the Magnoliophytina: Characterisation and systematic importance</i>). After postdoctoral research at Leuven for eight years, he became Director of the M.Sc. program in Biodiversity and Taxonomy of Plants jointly organised by the Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh (RBGE) and the University of Edinburgh, a post he held from 2002 to 2022. He remains attached at the RBGE as a Research Associate and an external lecturer.</p> <p>At Leuven and Edinburgh, Ronse De Craene developed a broad research program on flower morphology, studying in detail the floral development and anatomy of many angiosperm families in collaboration with scientists around the world. His most important contribution is a book entitled <i>Floral diagrams: An aid to understand floral morphology and evolution</i>, published by Cambridge University Press in 2010 (revised second edition in 2022). This book explores floral morphology of the angiosperms as an essential counterpart of their molecular phylogeny, and it continues in modern botany the scientific approach of Carolus Linnaeus, Wilhelm Eichler, Eugen Warming, and Rolf Dahlgren, among others. Taken as a whole, Ronse De Craene's work represents a valuable combination of research in several areas of systematics and evolution of the angiosperms.</p> <p>The Rolf and Gertrud Dahlgren Prize is awarded by the Royal Physiographic Society at Lund, an institution with the secondary title of Academy for the Natural Sciences, Medicine and Technology. This academy was founded on 2 December 1772, by, among others, the botanist Anders Jahan Retzius, for whom the South African genus <i>Retzia</i> (Retziaceae, or Stilbaceae) is named, and father of the anatomist Anders Adolf Retzius. Carl Peter Thunberg was
2023 年 12 月 2 日，在瑞典隆德皇家物理学会成立的年度庆典上，罗尔夫-达尔格伦和格特鲁德-达尔格伦奖（Rolf and Gertrud Dahlgren Prize for 2023）被授予爱丁堡皇家植物园的路易斯-朗斯-德-克雷尼（Louis Ronse De Craene）。该奖于 1988 年设立，每三年颁发一次，奖励那些秉承罗尔夫-达尔格伦和格特鲁德-达尔格伦的宽广胸襟，特别是在被子植物系统学和进化领域做出重大贡献的科学家，且不分国籍。获奖者由植物学各领域的活跃研究人员选出。Ronse De Craene因其在众多被子植物科的花发育方面的工作以及花形态学在现代系统发育研究中的重要性而获奖。1986 年，他在英国雷丁大学获得理学硕士学位，论文中他根据花的形态和解剖特征，提出了更明确的蓼属划分方法。1992 年，他在比利时鲁汶天主教大学（Catholic University of Leuven）获得博士学位，论文涉及被子植物的雄蕊（The androecium of the Magnoliophytina: Characterisation and systematic importance）。在鲁汶进行了八年的博士后研究后，他成为爱丁堡皇家植物园（RBGE）和爱丁堡大学联合举办的植物生物多样性和分类学硕士课程的主任，任期从 2002 年至 2022 年。在鲁汶大学和爱丁堡大学，Ronse De Craene开展了广泛的花形态学研究项目，与世界各地的科学家合作，详细研究了许多被子植物科的花发育和解剖。他最重要的贡献是一本名为《花图》的书：该书由剑桥大学出版社于 2010 年出版（第二版修订版于 2022 年出版）。这本书探讨了被子植物的花卉形态学，作为其分子系统发育的重要对应物，它在现代植物学中延续了卡罗勒斯-林奈、威廉-艾希勒、欧根-沃明和罗尔夫-达尔格伦等人的科学方法。从整体上看，朗斯-德-克雷尼的著作是被子植物系统学和进化论多个领域研究的宝贵结合。罗尔夫-达尔格伦和格特鲁德-达尔格伦奖由隆德皇家物理协会颁发，该协会的二级机构为自然科学、医学和技术学院。该学会成立于 1772 年 12 月 2 日，创始人包括植物学家安德斯-贾汉-雷齐乌斯（Anders Jahan Retzius）和解剖学家安德斯-阿道夫-雷齐乌斯（Anders Adolf Retzius）的父亲。卡尔-彼得-图恩伯格（Carl Peter Thunberg）于 1773 年当选为会员，老卡罗勒斯-林奈（Carolus Linnaeus the elder）于 1775 年当选为会员。罗尔夫-达尔格伦（Rolf Dahlgren）教授也是该学会的成员之一，他最著名的成就是建立了一套被子植物分类系统，该系统基于比以往更多的特征（包括解剖和化学特征）进行评估。达尔格伦对单子叶植物的分类尤其影响深远。罗尔夫-达尔格伦在隆德大学接受教育，1973 年成为哥本哈根大学植物博物馆和图书馆（现为丹麦自然历史博物馆的一部分）的系统植物学教授，直至 1987 年去世。该奖项由隆德、哥本哈根和其他植物学中心捐款设立。按照传统，颁奖仪式既在隆德举行（图 1），也会在哥本哈根举行（图 2），获奖者通常还会在两所大学发表演讲。图 2在图形浏览器中打开PowerPointIb Friis、Natasha de Vere 和 Louis Ronse De Craene 在哥本哈根植物园的棕榈屋前，Rolf Dahlgren 曾在这里担任教授（摄影：Catherine Ronse De Craene）。
{"title":"ROLF AND GERTRUD DAHLGREN PRIZE FOR 2023 AWARDED TO LOUIS RONSE DE CRAENE","authors":"Ib Friis, Natasha de Vere","doi":"10.1002/tax.13144","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/tax.13144","url":null,"abstract":"<p>On 2 December 2023, at the annual celebration of the foundation of the Royal Physiographic Society of Lund, Sweden, the Rolf and Gertrud Dahlgren Prize for 2023 was awarded to Louis Ronse De Craene, Royal Botanic Garden, Edinburgh. The Prize, inaugurated in 1988, is given every third year to a scientist who has made major contributions to botany in the broad-minded spirit of Rolf and Gertrud Dahlgren, particularly in the fields of systematics and evolution of the angiosperms, and regardless of their nationality. The prize-winner is chosen by active researchers in various fields of botany. Ronse De Craene has been awarded the prize for his work on floral development in a broad range of angiosperm families and the importance of floral morphology in the context of modern phylogenetic studies.</p>\u0000<p>Ronse De Craene was born in Kortrijk/Courtrai (Flemish Region of Belgium) in 1962. He obtained an M.Sc. at the University of Reading (U.K.) in 1986, with a thesis in which he proposed a clearer circumscription of the genus <i>Polygonum</i> based on floral morphological and anatomical characters. He received a doctorate at the Catholic University of Leuven (Belgium) in 1992 on a dissertation about the androecium of the angiosperms (<i>The androecium of the Magnoliophytina: Characterisation and systematic importance</i>). After postdoctoral research at Leuven for eight years, he became Director of the M.Sc. program in Biodiversity and Taxonomy of Plants jointly organised by the Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh (RBGE) and the University of Edinburgh, a post he held from 2002 to 2022. He remains attached at the RBGE as a Research Associate and an external lecturer.</p>\u0000<p>At Leuven and Edinburgh, Ronse De Craene developed a broad research program on flower morphology, studying in detail the floral development and anatomy of many angiosperm families in collaboration with scientists around the world. His most important contribution is a book entitled <i>Floral diagrams: An aid to understand floral morphology and evolution</i>, published by Cambridge University Press in 2010 (revised second edition in 2022). This book explores floral morphology of the angiosperms as an essential counterpart of their molecular phylogeny, and it continues in modern botany the scientific approach of Carolus Linnaeus, Wilhelm Eichler, Eugen Warming, and Rolf Dahlgren, among others. Taken as a whole, Ronse De Craene's work represents a valuable combination of research in several areas of systematics and evolution of the angiosperms.</p>\u0000<p>The Rolf and Gertrud Dahlgren Prize is awarded by the Royal Physiographic Society at Lund, an institution with the secondary title of Academy for the Natural Sciences, Medicine and Technology. This academy was founded on 2 December 1772, by, among others, the botanist Anders Jahan Retzius, for whom the South African genus <i>Retzia</i> (Retziaceae, or Stilbaceae) is named, and father of the anatomist Anders Adolf Retzius. Carl Peter Thunberg was ","PeriodicalId":49448,"journal":{"name":"Taxon","volume":"29 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2024-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139917817","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Seita T. Watanabe, Kazuhiko Hayashi, Katsuro Arakawa, Shizuka Fuse, Koji Takayama, Hidetoshi Nagamasu, Minoru N. Tamura
To clarify the evolutionary history of the Lilium maculatum–L. pensylvanicum complex in Japan and to improve the circumscription of its component taxa, we conducted phylogenetic analyses based on chloroplast and nuclear internal and external transcribed spacer (ITS, ETS) DNA sequences, a genome-wide analysis of single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) using multiplexed ISSR genotyping by sequencing (MIG-seq), and morphological observations. Topological differences between the chloroplast and nuclear ITS + ETS phylogenies indicate that ancient hybridization or incomplete lineage sorting were involved in the origin of “maculatum”, but the relatively long length of relevant branches indicates that incomplete lineage sorting is implausible. The results of STRUCTURE analysis (K = 3, the highest delta K value) using MIG-seq indicate that “maculatum” has already developed its own cluster and can be considered a species (L. maculatum) that originated through the hybridization of L. pacificum (sp. nov.) and L. pensylvanicum. MIG-seq Neighbor-Net and STRUCTURE analyses (K = 3), as well as chloroplast DNA phylogeny, reveal that populations in disjunct limestone areas (L. maculatum var. bukosanense) originated via the hybridization of L. maculatum and L. pacificum, whereas populations in the Sado-Tobishima Islands (L. maculatum var. sadoense, var. nov.) originated via hybridization between L. maculatum and L. pensylvanicum. These taxa appear to be more or less genetically isolated from other populations based on the STRUCTURE analysis (K = 5), although we do not know whether this isolation resulted from geographic distance or reproductive barriers. Based on available MIG-seq and morphological data, respectively, we consider the two hybrid-origin populations to be independent varieties. Furthermore, the morphology of seaside populations of L. maculatum in East Tohoku District appears to have deviated slightly from that of mountain populations (L. maculatum f. monticola); as such, coastal populations merit recognition as a form of L. maculatum (L. maculatum f. spontaneum, comb. & stat. nov.). Other seaside populations of L. maculatum in the West Tohoku District appear to have originated from populations of L. pacificum, but have been successively taken over by L. maculatum through introgression, and have consequently evolved into a form of L. maculatum (L. maculatum f. maculatum). In addition, we found putative extant hybrid populations of L. maculatum × L. pensylvanicum. We recognize three species, two varieties, two forms, and one hybrid in the L. maculatum–L. pensylvanicum complex in Japan.
为了澄清日本大花百合（Lilium maculatum-L.pensylvanicum）复合体的进化历史并改进其组成类群的圈定，我们基于叶绿体和核内外转录间隔（ITS、ETS）DNA序列、利用多重ISSR基因分型测序（MIG-seq）进行的单核苷酸多态性（SNPs）全基因组分析以及形态学观察进行了系统进化分析。叶绿体和核 ITS + ETS 系统发生之间的拓扑差异表明，古代杂交或不完全世系分选参与了 "大斑 "的起源，但相关分支的相对较长表明不完全世系分选是不可信的。利用 MIG-seq 进行的 STRUCTURE 分析（K = 3，最高 delta K 值）结果表明，"maculatum "已经形成了自己的聚类，可以被认为是通过 L. pacificum（sp. nov.）和 L. pensylvanicum 杂交起源的一个物种（L. maculatum）。MIG-seq Neighbor-Net 和 STRUCTURE 分析（K = 3）以及叶绿体 DNA 系统进化显示，不相连的石灰岩地区的种群（L. maculatum var.根据 STRUCTURE 分析（K = 5），这些分类群似乎或多或少与其他种群存在遗传隔离，但我们不知道这种隔离是由地理距离还是繁殖障碍造成的。根据现有的 MIG-seq 和形态学数据，我们认为这两个杂交起源种群是独立的品种。此外，东东北地区的海滨种群（L. maculatum f. monticola）的形态似乎与山地种群（L. maculatum f. spontaneum, comb. & stat. nov.）略有不同；因此，沿海种群应被认定为 L. maculatum 的一种形态（L. maculatum f. spontaneum, comb. & stat. nov.）。在西东北地区的其他海滨 L. maculatum 种群似乎起源于 L. pacificum 种群，但通过引种先后被 L. maculatum 取代，并进化为 L. maculatum 的一种形式（L. maculatum f. maculatum）。此外，我们还发现了 L. maculatum × L. pensylvanicum 的现存杂交种群。我们认为日本的 L. maculatum-L. pensylvanicum 复合物中有三个种、两个变种、两个形式和一个杂交种。
{"title":"Biosystematic studies on Lilium (Liliaceae) II. Evolutionary history and taxon recognition in the L. maculatum–L. pensylvanicum complex in Japan","authors":"Seita T. Watanabe, Kazuhiko Hayashi, Katsuro Arakawa, Shizuka Fuse, Koji Takayama, Hidetoshi Nagamasu, Minoru N. Tamura","doi":"10.1002/tax.13141","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/tax.13141","url":null,"abstract":"To clarify the evolutionary history of the <i>Lilium maculatum–L. pensylvanicum</i> complex in Japan and to improve the circumscription of its component taxa, we conducted phylogenetic analyses based on chloroplast and nuclear internal and external transcribed spacer (ITS, ETS) DNA sequences, a genome-wide analysis of single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) using multiplexed ISSR genotyping by sequencing (MIG-seq), and morphological observations. Topological differences between the chloroplast and nuclear ITS + ETS phylogenies indicate that ancient hybridization or incomplete lineage sorting were involved in the origin of “<i>maculatum</i>”, but the relatively long length of relevant branches indicates that incomplete lineage sorting is implausible. The results of STRUCTURE analysis (<i>K</i> = 3, the highest delta <i>K</i> value) using MIG-seq indicate that “<i>maculatum</i>” has already developed its own cluster and can be considered a species (<i>L. maculatum</i>) that originated through the hybridization of <i>L. pacificum</i> (sp. nov.) and <i>L. pensylvanicum</i>. MIG-seq Neighbor-Net and STRUCTURE analyses (<i>K</i> = 3), as well as chloroplast DNA phylogeny, reveal that populations in disjunct limestone areas (<i>L. maculatum</i> var. <i>bukosanense</i>) originated via the hybridization of <i>L. maculatum</i> and <i>L. pacificum</i>, whereas populations in the Sado-Tobishima Islands (<i>L. maculatum</i> var. <i>sadoense</i>, var. nov.) originated via hybridization between <i>L. maculatum</i> and <i>L. pensylvanicum</i>. These taxa appear to be more or less genetically isolated from other populations based on the STRUCTURE analysis (<i>K</i> = 5), although we do not know whether this isolation resulted from geographic distance or reproductive barriers. Based on available MIG-seq and morphological data, respectively, we consider the two hybrid-origin populations to be independent varieties. Furthermore, the morphology of seaside populations of <i>L. maculatum</i> in East Tohoku District appears to have deviated slightly from that of mountain populations (<i>L. maculatum</i> f. <i>monticola</i>); as such, coastal populations merit recognition as a form of <i>L. maculatum</i> (<i>L. maculatum</i> f. <i>spontaneum</i>, comb. & stat. nov.). Other seaside populations of <i>L. maculatum</i> in the West Tohoku District appear to have originated from populations of <i>L. pacificum</i>, but have been successively taken over by <i>L. maculatum</i> through introgression, and have consequently evolved into a form of <i>L. maculatum</i> (<i>L. maculatum</i> f. <i>maculatum</i>). In addition, we found putative extant hybrid populations of <i>L. maculatum × L. pensylvanicum</i>. We recognize three species, two varieties, two forms, and one hybrid in the <i>L. maculatum–L. pensylvanicum</i> complex in Japan.","PeriodicalId":49448,"journal":{"name":"Taxon","volume":"10 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2024-02-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139956467","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：