Sports Medicine and Arthroscopy Review最新文献

Cartilage injuries of the hand and wrist can be debilitating in the athlete. Diagnosis is difficult given the broad spectrum of presenting symptomatology. History and physical examination is crucial to achieve the correct diagnosis, and advanced imaging can offer helpful assistance to the clinician as well. TFCC injuries and ulnar impaction syndrome are among the most common conditions in athletes with hand and wrist pain. Treatment of these injuries is initially nonoperative, but elite athletes may elect to bypass nonoperative treatment in favor of earlier return to sport. Surgical treatment varies but can include open and arthroscopic methods. The clinician should tailor treatment plans to each athlete based on level of competition, type of sport, and individual preferences and goals.

Cartilage injuries can present in a diverse setting of anatomic locations, with varying severity, and can impact athletes of all ages and competition levels. Moreover, the timing of when an injury presents introduces an additional dimension to treatment decision-making. Frequently, the level of competition, in conjunction with career trajectory and short-term and long-term athlete goals, will dictate whether a temporary or definitive treatment strategy is ideal. Although indicating the correct therapeutic regimen may prove challenging, understanding the athlete-specific considerations can be essential to meeting the goals of the athlete and other stakeholders involved in the athlete's career. The purpose of this review is to comprehensively present the deliberations a treating physician must consider in managing cartilage injuries within a spectrum of athletic levels ranging from youth to professional levels, with a secondary focus on the presentation of temporizing treatment strategies and associated outcomes.

Articular cartilage lesions are a common injury that have become increasingly treatable with joint preservation procedures. Well-documented allograft and cellular treatments for these lesions are detailed elsewhere in this volume. This article discusses three new unique options for addressing these defects taking three different paths to address these complex injuries. Agili-C is an existing FDA- and EMEA-approved option using an acellular aragonite-based scaffold to treat both chondral and osteochondral lesions, with or without concurrent arthritis. Cartistem is a stem-cell-based product composed of culture-expanded allogeneic human umbilical cord blood-derived mesenchymal stem cells and hyaluronic acid hydrogel, which is in its final clinical trial stages in the United States, but already has regulatory approval in Korea. IMPACT and RECLAIM studies have shown the safety and efficacy of a new one-stage procedure utilizing autologous chondrons combined with allogeneic mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) that can provide another effective single-stage treatment option.

Cartilage lesions of the knee are a challenging problem, especially for active individuals and athletes who desire a return to high-load activities. They occur both through chronic repetitive loading of the knee joint or through acute traumatic injury and represent a major cause of pain and time lost from sport. They can arise as isolated lesions or in association with concomitant knee pathology. Management of these defects ultimately requires a sound understanding of their pathophysiologic underpinnings to help guide treatment. Team physicians should maintain a high index of suspicion for underlying cartilage lesions in any patient presenting with a knee effusion, whether painful or not. A thorough workup should include a complete history and physical examination. MRI is the most sensitive and specific imaging modality to assess these lesions and can provide intricate detail not only of the structure and composition of cartilage, but also of the surrounding physiological environment in the joint. Treatment of these lesions consists of both conservative or supportive measures, as well as surgical interventions designed to restore or regenerate healthy cartilage. Because of the poor inherent capacity for healing associated with hyaline cartilage, the vast majority of symptomatic lesions will ultimately require surgery. Surgical treatment options range from simple arthroscopic debridement to large osteochondral reconstructions. Operative decision-making is based on numerous patient- and defect-related factors and requires open lines of communication between the athlete, the surgeon, and the rest of the treatment team. Ultimately, a positive outcome is based on the creation of a durable, resistant repair that allows the athlete to return to pain-free sporting activities.

Articular cartilage defects in the knee are common in athletes who have a variety of loading demands across the knee. Athletes of different sports may have different baseline risk of injury. The most studied sports in terms of prevalence and treatment of cartilage injuries include soccer (football), American football, and basketball. At this time, the authors do not specifically treat patients by their sport; however, return to sports timing may be earlier in sports with fewer demands on the knee based on the rehabilitation protocol. If conservative management is unsuccessful, the authors typically perform a staging arthroscopy with chondroplasty, followed by osteochondral allograft transplantation with possible additional concomitant procedures, such as osteotomies or meniscal transplants. Athletes in a variety of sports and at high levels of competition can successfully return to sports with the appropriate considerations and treatment.

Articular cartilage defects in the glenohumeral joint may be found in laborers, the elderly, and young athletes, among others. Various factors can contribute to cartilage damage, including prior surgery, trauma, avascular necrosis, inflammatory arthritis, joint instability, and osteoarthritis. There is a wide variety of treatment options, from conservative treatment, injections, and surgical options, including arthroscopic debridement, microfracture, osteochondral autograft transfer, osteochondral graft transplantation, autologous chondrocyte implantation, and the newly emerging techniques such as biologic augmentation. There is a challenge to determine the optimal treatment options, especially for young athletes, due to limited outcomes in the literature. However, there are many options which are viable to address osteochondral defects of the glenohumeral joint.