Pub Date : 2026-02-01Epub Date: 2026-01-14DOI: 10.1016/j.siny.2026.101699
Gianluca Lista , Istvan Seri
{"title":"Special Issue on artificial intelligence in neonatology","authors":"Gianluca Lista , Istvan Seri","doi":"10.1016/j.siny.2026.101699","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.siny.2026.101699","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":49547,"journal":{"name":"Seminars in Fetal & Neonatal Medicine","volume":"31 1","pages":"Article 101699"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146120793","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-01Epub Date: 2025-11-24DOI: 10.1016/j.siny.2025.101690
Antonio Martínez Millana , Álvaro Solaz-García , Andrea García Montaner , María Portolés-Morales , Longwei Xiao , Yan Sun , Vicente Traver , Máximo Vento , Pilar Sáenz-González
Objectives
To explore the applicability of artificial intelligence (AI) in neonatal intensive care units (NICUs), identifying key trends in AI-driven technologies and their roles in the prognosis, classification, monitoring and forecasting of neonatal conditions.
Methods
A PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses)-guided systematic review was conducted across MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane, and IEEE Xplore, covering studies published between January 2013 and December 2023. A total of 318 studies were initially retrieved. After removing 61 duplicates and screening 257 articles by eligibility criteria, 64 studies were assessed for full-text eligibility, leading to the final inclusion of 41 studies.
Results
The predominant AI application referred to conditions in the following systems: cardiovascular (n = 9, 21.9 %), neural/brain (n = 8, 19.5 %), respiratory (n = 8, 19.5 %), immune (infections) (n = 6, 14.6 %), gastrointestinal (n = 2, 4.9 %), and microvascular diseases (n = 1, 2.4 %). Additionally, six studies focused on monitoring systems or body positioning (categorized as "Not Disease"), and one study (2.4 %) addressed mortality prediction. Regarding the purposes of AI application, prognosis (n = 23, 56.1 %) was the most common, followed by classification (n = 14, 34.1 %), monitoring (n = 5, 12.2 %), and symptom forecasting (n = 1, 2.4 %). More than 70 % of studies (n = 29, 70.7 %) lacked a validation procedure, highlighting a critical gap in methodological rigor.
Conclusions
Our findings underscore the potential benefits of the use of AI in neonatology, possibly resulting in improved patient outcomes and enhanced operational efficiency. However, data privacy, algorithm interpretability, and ethical considerations must be addressed for responsible AI deployment in neonatal care. We highlight future directions, emphasizing interdisciplinary collaboration, adherence to reporting guidelines, and the need for further research to enhance AI reproducibility and clinical integration in the NICUs. The findings of this study support AI's potential for shaping neonatal health care.
{"title":"A systematic review on the use of artificial intelligence in the neonatal intensive care unit: far beyond the potential impact","authors":"Antonio Martínez Millana , Álvaro Solaz-García , Andrea García Montaner , María Portolés-Morales , Longwei Xiao , Yan Sun , Vicente Traver , Máximo Vento , Pilar Sáenz-González","doi":"10.1016/j.siny.2025.101690","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.siny.2025.101690","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>To explore the applicability of artificial intelligence (AI) in neonatal intensive care units (NICUs), identifying key trends in AI-driven technologies and their roles in the prognosis, classification, monitoring and forecasting of neonatal conditions.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses)-guided systematic review was conducted across MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane, and IEEE Xplore, covering studies published between January 2013 and December 2023. A total of 318 studies were initially retrieved. After removing 61 duplicates and screening 257 articles by eligibility criteria, 64 studies were assessed for full-text eligibility, leading to the final inclusion of 41 studies.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The predominant AI application referred to conditions in the following systems: cardiovascular (n = 9, 21.9 %), neural/brain (n = 8, 19.5 %), respiratory (n = 8, 19.5 %), immune (infections) (n = 6, 14.6 %), gastrointestinal (n = 2, 4.9 %), and microvascular diseases (n = 1, 2.4 %). Additionally, six studies focused on monitoring systems or body positioning (categorized as \"Not Disease\"), and one study (2.4 %) addressed mortality prediction. Regarding the purposes of AI application, prognosis (n = 23, 56.1 %) was the most common, followed by classification (n = 14, 34.1 %), monitoring (n = 5, 12.2 %), and symptom forecasting (n = 1, 2.4 %). More than 70 % of studies (n = 29, 70.7 %) lacked a validation procedure, highlighting a critical gap in methodological rigor.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Our findings underscore the potential benefits of the use of AI in neonatology, possibly resulting in improved patient outcomes and enhanced operational efficiency. However, data privacy, algorithm interpretability, and ethical considerations must be addressed for responsible AI deployment in neonatal care. We highlight future directions, emphasizing interdisciplinary collaboration, adherence to reporting guidelines, and the need for further research to enhance AI reproducibility and clinical integration in the NICUs. The findings of this study support AI's potential for shaping neonatal health care.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49547,"journal":{"name":"Seminars in Fetal & Neonatal Medicine","volume":"31 1","pages":"Article 101690"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145642295","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-01Epub Date: 2025-11-18DOI: 10.1016/j.siny.2025.101689
Wissam Shalish , Josef Neu , Guilherme Sant’Anna
Optimizing neonatal nutrition and diagnosing serious gastrointestinal diseases remains a challenge, as traditional guideline-based approaches often fail to address the individualized needs of preterm and term infants. Advances in artificial intelligence and machine learning provide opportunities for precision diagnostics and therapeutics by incorporating multiomic data and clustering infants based on risk factors and metabolic profiles. For example, machine learning is redefining necrotizing enterocolitis as a spectrum of intestinal injuries rather than a single disease, while digital twin models offer the potential for real-time personalized nutrition optimization. Moreover, integration of advanced gastrointestinal monitoring methods using novel biomarkers and sensor technologies may further enhance early detection and intervention strategies. Altogether, these digital technological advancements may lead to identification of early predictors of nutritional deficiencies and prompt recognition of gastrointestinal pathologies, thereby allowing for proactive interventions and potentially improved outcomes in the neonatal population.
{"title":"Application of AI in neonatal gastroenterology and nutrition","authors":"Wissam Shalish , Josef Neu , Guilherme Sant’Anna","doi":"10.1016/j.siny.2025.101689","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.siny.2025.101689","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Optimizing neonatal nutrition and diagnosing serious gastrointestinal diseases remains a challenge, as traditional guideline-based approaches often fail to address the individualized needs of preterm and term infants. Advances in artificial intelligence and machine learning provide opportunities for precision diagnostics and therapeutics by incorporating multiomic data and clustering infants based on risk factors and metabolic profiles. For example, machine learning is redefining necrotizing enterocolitis as a spectrum of intestinal injuries rather than a single disease, while digital twin models offer the potential for real-time personalized nutrition optimization. Moreover, integration of advanced gastrointestinal monitoring methods using novel biomarkers and sensor technologies may further enhance early detection and intervention strategies. Altogether, these digital technological advancements may lead to identification of early predictors of nutritional deficiencies and prompt recognition of gastrointestinal pathologies, thereby allowing for proactive interventions and potentially improved outcomes in the neonatal population.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49547,"journal":{"name":"Seminars in Fetal & Neonatal Medicine","volume":"31 1","pages":"Article 101689"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145606981","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-01Epub Date: 2025-11-19DOI: 10.1016/j.siny.2025.101687
Deepika Kainth, Ramesh Agarwal
Neonatal sepsis remains a major cause of neonatal deaths globally. Despite advances, accurate and timely diagnosis is hindered by the limited performance of the current clinical approaches, imperfect laboratory biomarkers, and long turnaround time of blood cultures. Artificial intelligence (AI), with its ability to identify patterns and learn continuously (machine learning), seems promising. Basic steps in model development include data filtration, train: test split, feature selection, choosing appropriate algorithms, and evaluating performance using a reference standard. In neonatal sepsis, the role of AI spans from predicting sepsis and related outcomes to formulating an individualized treatment approach for the neonate. Existing models, largely from high-income countries, report encouraging diagnostic accuracy but face methodological limitations, lack external validation, and remain somewhat distant from bedside application. Additional barriers to their generalizability include lack of uniform definition of sepsis, variations in disease and pathogen profiles in different settings (particularly in developing countries), availability of electronic health data, tweaks in feature selection, and ethical and legal challenges. This review synthesizes current evidence, highlights gaps, and outlines priorities for future research. We call for a collaborative effort from AI and neonatal experts to devise robust, context-specific solutions.
{"title":"Artificial intelligence in neonatal sepsis: Scope, challenges, and potential solutions!","authors":"Deepika Kainth, Ramesh Agarwal","doi":"10.1016/j.siny.2025.101687","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.siny.2025.101687","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Neonatal sepsis remains a major cause of neonatal deaths globally. Despite advances, accurate and timely diagnosis is hindered by the limited performance of the current clinical approaches, imperfect laboratory biomarkers, and long turnaround time of blood cultures. Artificial intelligence (AI), with its ability to identify patterns and learn continuously (machine learning), seems promising. Basic steps in model development include data filtration, train: test split, feature selection, choosing appropriate algorithms, and evaluating performance using a reference standard. In neonatal sepsis, the role of AI spans from predicting sepsis and related outcomes to formulating an individualized treatment approach for the neonate. Existing models, largely from high-income countries, report encouraging diagnostic accuracy but face methodological limitations, lack external validation, and remain somewhat distant from bedside application. Additional barriers to their generalizability include lack of uniform definition of sepsis, variations in disease and pathogen profiles in different settings (particularly in developing countries), availability of electronic health data, tweaks in feature selection, and ethical and legal challenges. This review synthesizes current evidence, highlights gaps, and outlines priorities for future research. We call for a collaborative effort from AI and neonatal experts to devise robust, context-specific solutions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49547,"journal":{"name":"Seminars in Fetal & Neonatal Medicine","volume":"31 1","pages":"Article 101687"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145607141","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-01Epub Date: 2025-11-19DOI: 10.1016/j.siny.2025.101688
Chelsea K. Bitler , C. Briana Bertoni , Brian C. King , Thomas A. Hooven , Christopher M. Horvat
Mortality remains a key indicator for the assessment of care quality in medicine. In neonatology, mortality rates are highly variable, both across units and over time. Comparison of crude mortality rates, however, are insufficient for benchmarking, as they fail to account for differences in population case mix and severity of illness. Risk adjustment using artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) has emerged as a promising tool to facilitate meaningful comparisons and drive improvement. This review seeks to examine the state of the current literature on the use of AI/ML-based models to predict mortality in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU). We identified 37 studies describing 242 models. Most studies developed models using single-center data and frequently lacked external validation. Similarly, reporting of performance metrics was heterogenous, limiting evaluation. As a result, further work is necessary before AI/ML-enabled risk adjustment is feasible.
{"title":"Neonatal artificial intelligence and machine learning mortality prediction modeling: A systematic review for risk adjustment in the neonatal intensive care unit","authors":"Chelsea K. Bitler , C. Briana Bertoni , Brian C. King , Thomas A. Hooven , Christopher M. Horvat","doi":"10.1016/j.siny.2025.101688","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.siny.2025.101688","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Mortality remains a key indicator for the assessment of care quality in medicine. In neonatology, mortality rates are highly variable, both across units and over time. Comparison of crude mortality rates, however, are insufficient for benchmarking, as they fail to account for differences in population case mix and severity of illness. Risk adjustment using artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) has emerged as a promising tool to facilitate meaningful comparisons and drive improvement. This review seeks to examine the state of the current literature on the use of AI/ML-based models to predict mortality in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU). We identified 37 studies describing 242 models. Most studies developed models using single-center data and frequently lacked external validation. Similarly, reporting of performance metrics was heterogenous, limiting evaluation. As a result, further work is necessary before AI/ML-enabled risk adjustment is feasible.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49547,"journal":{"name":"Seminars in Fetal & Neonatal Medicine","volume":"31 1","pages":"Article 101688"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145641899","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-01Epub Date: 2025-11-19DOI: 10.1016/j.siny.2025.101691
Luana Conte , Nunzia Decembrino , Cristina Arribas , Federico Cucci , Giorgio De Nunzio , Ilaria Amodeo , Genny Raffaeli , Roberta Leonardi , Donato Cascio , Felipe Garrido , Giacomo Cavallaro
The use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) has the potential to transform healthcare in part by enhancing the accuracy of drug dosing and improving patient safety. However, its use in neonatology and pediatrics has just been started, with limited research exploring its full potential. This scoping review systematically maps the literature on AI applications in pediatric and neonatal pharmacology, analyzing studies published between 2004 and 2024. Searches in databases including MEDLINE, Scopus, and IEEE Xplore identified 412 records, of which 33 met the inclusion criteria. These included neonates (n = 8) and older pediatric patients (n = 25), encompassing 58,864 patients and utilizing various Machine-Learning techniques. The use of AI has demonstrated significant potential for precision dosing, predicting drug efficacy, and decreasing the occurrence of adverse events. Despite these promising findings, however, more rigorous, large-scale studies are essential to validate the results. Future research should prioritize real-world applications and address integration barriers, ensuring safe and effective use of AI in neonatal and pediatric clinical practice.
{"title":"Leveraging Artificial Intelligence for decision support in neonatal and pediatric pharmacotherapy: A scoping review","authors":"Luana Conte , Nunzia Decembrino , Cristina Arribas , Federico Cucci , Giorgio De Nunzio , Ilaria Amodeo , Genny Raffaeli , Roberta Leonardi , Donato Cascio , Felipe Garrido , Giacomo Cavallaro","doi":"10.1016/j.siny.2025.101691","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.siny.2025.101691","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) has the potential to transform healthcare in part by enhancing the accuracy of drug dosing and improving patient safety. However, its use in neonatology and pediatrics has just been started, with limited research exploring its full potential. This scoping review systematically maps the literature on AI applications in pediatric and neonatal pharmacology, analyzing studies published between 2004 and 2024. Searches in databases including MEDLINE, Scopus, and IEEE Xplore identified 412 records, of which 33 met the inclusion criteria. These included neonates (n = 8) and older pediatric patients (n = 25), encompassing 58,864 patients and utilizing various Machine-Learning techniques. The use of AI has demonstrated significant potential for precision dosing, predicting drug efficacy, and decreasing the occurrence of adverse events. Despite these promising findings, however, more rigorous, large-scale studies are essential to validate the results. Future research should prioritize real-world applications and address integration barriers, ensuring safe and effective use of AI in neonatal and pediatric clinical practice.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49547,"journal":{"name":"Seminars in Fetal & Neonatal Medicine","volume":"31 1","pages":"Article 101691"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145679211","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-01Epub Date: 2025-09-25DOI: 10.1016/j.siny.2025.101665
Varvara Dimopoulou , Kirsten Glaser , Eric Giannoni
Newborns, especially preterm infants, are vulnerable to invasive infections due to their developing immune system and frequent need for central venous catheters. Central line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSI) are among the most common invasive infections in this population and represent the leading cause of neonatal bloodstream infection in many settings. Neonatal CLABSI is associated with substantial mortality, long-term morbidity, and increased healthcare costs. Most importantly, CLABSI is preventable. Bundles centered on rigorous hand hygiene combined with standardized practices for catheter insertion, maintenance and removal have proven effective in reducing infection rates in neonates. Benchmarking and quality improvement initiatives enable neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) to track progress and share best practices. While no novel prevention strategies with robust evidence have emerged, sustained declines in CLABSI rates in many NICUs and networks over the past decades highlight the importance of a comprehensive multidisciplinary approach to implement and maintain best practices.
{"title":"Central line-associated blood stream infections in newborns: From vulnerability to prevention","authors":"Varvara Dimopoulou , Kirsten Glaser , Eric Giannoni","doi":"10.1016/j.siny.2025.101665","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.siny.2025.101665","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Newborns, especially preterm infants, are vulnerable to invasive infections due to their developing immune system and frequent need for central venous catheters. Central line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSI) are among the most common invasive infections in this population and represent the leading cause of neonatal bloodstream infection in many settings. Neonatal CLABSI is associated with substantial mortality, long-term morbidity, and increased healthcare costs. Most importantly, CLABSI is preventable. Bundles centered on rigorous hand hygiene combined with standardized practices for catheter insertion, maintenance and removal have proven effective in reducing infection rates in neonates. Benchmarking and quality improvement initiatives enable neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) to track progress and share best practices. While no novel prevention strategies with robust evidence have emerged, sustained declines in CLABSI rates in many NICUs and networks over the past decades highlight the importance of a comprehensive multidisciplinary approach to implement and maintain best practices.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49547,"journal":{"name":"Seminars in Fetal & Neonatal Medicine","volume":"30 4","pages":"Article 101665"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145228679","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-01Epub Date: 2025-09-25DOI: 10.1016/j.siny.2025.101667
Nestor E. Vain , Paolo Manzoni , Kee Thai Yeo
Prevention of RSV lower respiratory tract infections (LRTI) in infants has been limited to general measures and palivizumab, a monoclonal antibody indicated for the highest risk groups. Recently developed RSV vaccines used during pregnancy generate antibodies that cross the placenta. Randomized controlled trials (RCT) and real-life monitoring have demonstrated their effectiveness in protecting newborns and infants during the first months of life. Likewise, novel extended half-life monoclonal antibodies, nirsevimab and the recently approved clesrovimab, opened the possibility of large-scale protection targeted to all infants born during the winter season and those <6 months at the beginning of it. Several RCTs and results from populations adopting nirsevimab prophylaxis demonstrated a large decrease in the incidence of RSV-LRTIs and a great impact in infant public health. Deployment of either strategies or in combination as part of immunization programs can be complement each other even as newer immunologic agents are being introduced.
{"title":"Respiratory syncytial virus. What's new in prevention?","authors":"Nestor E. Vain , Paolo Manzoni , Kee Thai Yeo","doi":"10.1016/j.siny.2025.101667","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.siny.2025.101667","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Prevention of RSV lower respiratory tract infections (LRTI) in infants has been limited to general measures and palivizumab, a monoclonal antibody indicated for the highest risk groups. Recently developed RSV vaccines used during pregnancy generate antibodies that cross the placenta. Randomized controlled trials (RCT) and real-life monitoring have demonstrated their effectiveness in protecting newborns and infants during the first months of life. Likewise, novel extended half-life monoclonal antibodies, nirsevimab and the recently approved clesrovimab, opened the possibility of large-scale protection targeted to all infants born during the winter season and those <6 months at the beginning of it. Several RCTs and results from populations adopting nirsevimab prophylaxis demonstrated a large decrease in the incidence of RSV-LRTIs and a great impact in infant public health. Deployment of either strategies or in combination as part of immunization programs can be complement each other even as newer immunologic agents are being introduced.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49547,"journal":{"name":"Seminars in Fetal & Neonatal Medicine","volume":"30 4","pages":"Article 101667"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145245680","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-01Epub Date: 2025-09-25DOI: 10.1016/j.siny.2025.101668
Nicholas D. Embleton , Chris H.P. van den Akker , Belal N. Alshaikh
Probiotic supplementation in preterm infants is one of the most extensively studied interventions in neonatal medicine, with over 50 randomised controlled trials. This paper examines the relationship between probiotic supplementation and late onset sepsis (LOS), considering mechanistic pathways, clinical evidence, and safety profile.
Multiple systematic reviews and meta-analyses consistently show that probiotics reduce necrotising enterocolitis (NEC) incidence and all-cause mortality in preterm infants, establishing them as one of the most beneficial interventions in neonatology. Current evidence suggests modest effects on LOS, with Cochrane systematic reviews reporting relative risk 0.89 (95 % CI 0.82–0.97) but with low certainty. Mechanisms supporting LOS reduction include competitive pathogen exclusion, enhanced epithelial barrier function, improved immune responses, and reduced time to full enteral feeding with decreased intravenous access requirements.
The safety profile of probiotics is reassuring, with serious adverse events being exceptionally rare. Probiotic-induced sepsis probably occurs in less than 0.5 % of treated infants, representing a very low risk that must be weighed against the likely substantial benefits for NEC and mortality reduction. Product contamination and other quality issues exist but appear manageable with appropriate quality control.
Given the robust evidence for NEC and mortality reduction, probiotics represent a valuable intervention for preterm infants but may have limited, if any impact on sepsis. While their specific role in LOS prevention and impacts on the resistome requires further investigation, the overall benefit-risk profile strongly favors their use. Future research will further refine understanding of optimal strain selection and implementation strategies for maximizing clinical benefits while maintaining safety.
早产儿补充益生菌是新生儿医学中研究最广泛的干预措施之一,有50多个随机对照试验。本文探讨了益生菌补充与迟发性脓毒症(LOS)之间的关系,考虑了机制途径、临床证据和安全性。多个系统综述和荟萃分析一致表明,益生菌可以降低早产儿坏死性小肠结肠炎(NEC)的发病率和全因死亡率,使其成为新生儿学中最有益的干预措施之一。目前的证据表明对LOS的影响不大,Cochrane系统评价报告的相对风险为0.89 (95% CI 0.82-0.97),但确定性较低。支持LOS减少的机制包括竞争性病原体排斥、上皮屏障功能增强、免疫反应改善、完全肠内喂养时间缩短和静脉通路需求减少。益生菌的安全性令人放心,严重的不良事件非常罕见。益生菌引起的脓毒症可能发生在不到0.5%的接受治疗的婴儿中,这代表了一个非常低的风险,必须与NEC和死亡率降低的可能实质性益处进行权衡。产品污染和其他质量问题存在,但似乎可以通过适当的质量控制。鉴于NEC和死亡率降低的有力证据,益生菌对早产儿来说是一种有价值的干预措施,但对败血症的影响可能有限。虽然它们在LOS预防中的具体作用和对抵抗组的影响需要进一步调查,但总体的利益-风险概况强烈支持它们的使用。未来的研究将进一步完善对最佳菌株选择的理解和实施策略,以最大限度地提高临床效益,同时保持安全性。
{"title":"Probiotic supplementation – does it prevent or cause neonatal sepsis?","authors":"Nicholas D. Embleton , Chris H.P. van den Akker , Belal N. Alshaikh","doi":"10.1016/j.siny.2025.101668","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.siny.2025.101668","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Probiotic supplementation in preterm infants is one of the most extensively studied interventions in neonatal medicine, with over 50 randomised controlled trials. This paper examines the relationship between probiotic supplementation and late onset sepsis (LOS), considering mechanistic pathways, clinical evidence, and safety profile.</div><div>Multiple systematic reviews and meta-analyses consistently show that probiotics reduce necrotising enterocolitis (NEC) incidence and all-cause mortality in preterm infants, establishing them as one of the most beneficial interventions in neonatology. Current evidence suggests modest effects on LOS, with Cochrane systematic reviews reporting relative risk 0.89 (95 % CI 0.82–0.97) but with low certainty. Mechanisms supporting LOS reduction include competitive pathogen exclusion, enhanced epithelial barrier function, improved immune responses, and reduced time to full enteral feeding with decreased intravenous access requirements.</div><div>The safety profile of probiotics is reassuring, with serious adverse events being exceptionally rare. Probiotic-induced sepsis probably occurs in less than 0.5 % of treated infants, representing a very low risk that must be weighed against the likely substantial benefits for NEC and mortality reduction. Product contamination and other quality issues exist but appear manageable with appropriate quality control.</div><div>Given the robust evidence for NEC and mortality reduction, probiotics represent a valuable intervention for preterm infants but may have limited, if any impact on sepsis. While their specific role in LOS prevention and impacts on the resistome requires further investigation, the overall benefit-risk profile strongly favors their use. Future research will further refine understanding of optimal strain selection and implementation strategies for maximizing clinical benefits while maintaining safety.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49547,"journal":{"name":"Seminars in Fetal & Neonatal Medicine","volume":"30 4","pages":"Article 101668"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145207818","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}