Seminars in Diagnostic Pathology最新文献

Squamous cell carcinoma of the vulva is a rare gynecologic cancer that is associated with significant patient morbidity and mortality, particularly for recurrent disease. This review summarizes the evidence and continued challenges, regarding the traditional clinicopathologic factors used to prognosticate vulvar squamous cell carcinoma. Articles published within the last 10 years (2010-2020) were identified. Relevant articles concerning the following fifteen prognostic factors were reviewed: HPV/p16 status, vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia, patient age, tumor stage, tumor grade, tumor size, depth of invasion, stromal changes, histologic patterns of invasion, lymphovascular space invasion (LVSI), perineural invasion, lymph node metastases, tumour focality, margin status and lichen sclerosus (LS). The relationship between each prognostic factor and progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), including hazard ratios, 95% confidence intervals and p-values, were extracted.

High-grade carcinomas of the salivary glands are a group of several tumor entities with highly malignant histologic appearances, and have an aggressive biological behavior accompanied by poor a prognosis. In general, they require more intensive treatment than low- or intermediate-grade carcinomas. High-grade salivary carcinomas are rare and the microscopic features often overlap between different tumor types, making an appropriate diagnosis challenging in daily practice settings. However, with recent rapid advances in molecular pathology and molecular-targeted therapy in this field, there is a growing need to properly classify tumors, rather than just diagnosing the cases as “high-grade carcinomas”. This leads to specific treatment strategies. In this article, we review representative high-grade salivary gland carcinomas, including salivary duct carcinoma and its histologic subtypes, high-grade mucoepidermoid carcinoma, solid-type adenoid cystic carcinoma, and high-grade transformation of low- or intermediate-grade carcinomas, and discuss their differential diagnoses and clinical implications. Other rare entities, such as neuroendocrine carcinoma, NUT carcinoma, and metastatic carcinoma, should also be considered before diagnosing high-grade carcinoma, NOS. Of these tumors, salivary duct carcinoma has received the most attention because of its strong association with androgen deprivation and anti-HER2 therapies. Other tumor-type-specific treatments include anti-TRK therapy for high-grade transformation of secretory carcinoma, but further therapeutic options are expected to be developed in the future. It should be emphasized that detailed histological evaluation with adequate sampling, in addition to the effective use of molecular ancillary tests, is of the utmost importance for a suitable diagnosis.

Mucoepidermoid carcinoma (MEC) is the most common malignant salivary gland tumor. Varying sized cysts and sheets composed of three cell types (epidermoid, intermediate, and mucous cells) with varying degrees of atypia form the characteristic histological appearance of MEC. MEC frequently contains a wide variety of modified tumor cells and can be entirely cystic or completely solid. Under these circumstances, MEC requires critical differentiation from many mimickers, ranging from simple cysts and benign tumors to high-grade carcinomas. Tumor-associated lymphoid proliferation and sclerotic changes in the stroma also contribute to diagnostic difficulties. Several well-known diagnostically challenging variants (oncocytic, clear cell, spindle cell, and sclerosing) exist in MEC. With the advent of studies on specific CRTC1/3::MAML2 fusion genes in MEC, newly proposed subtypes have emerged, including Warthin-like and non-sebaceous lymphadenoma-like MECs. In addition to the recently defined mucoacinar variant with a serous cell phenotype, MEC devoid of squamous differentiation has also been reported, implying the need to reconsider this basic concept. In this article, we outline the general clinical features and MAML2 status of conventional MEC and review the cytoarchitectural subtypes, with an emphasis on a pitfall in the interpretation of this histologically diverse single entity.

IgG4-related kidney disease (IgG4-RKD) encompasses all forms of kidney disease that are part of IgG4-related disease (IgG4-RD). First recognized as IgG4-related tubulointerstitial nephritis (IgG4-TIN), and then IgG4-related membranous glomerulonephritis (IgG4-MGN), we now recognize additional patterns of interstitial nephritis, glomerular disease, and vascular disease that can be seen as part of IgG4-RKD. The clinical presentation is variable and can include acute or chronic kidney injury, proteinuria or nephrotic syndrome, mass lesion(s), and obstruction. While usually associated with other organ involvement by IgG4-RD, kidney-alone involvement is present in approximately 20 % of IgG4-RKD. Compared to IgG4-RD overall, patients with IgG4-RKD are more likely to show increased serum IgG4 or IgG, and more likely to have hypocomplementemia. In this review, we extensively cover other types of autoimmune and plasma cell-rich interstitial nephritis, mass forming inflammatory diseases of the kidney, and other mimics of IgG4-TIN, in particular ANCA-associated disease.

The recognition of immunoglobulin G4-related disease (IgG4-RD) as an entity in the pancreaticobiliary tract was followed by a slew of papers describing inflammation and fibrosis containing IgG4-positive plasma cells in a variety of sites including the respiratory tract, leading to the hypothesis that these abnormalities were attributable to IgG4-RD. Predictably, pathologists began to see requests from clinicians to perform IgG4 immunohistochemistry in lung biopsies “to rule out IgG4-RD”. Several years later, the notion that IgG4-RD would prove to be the underlying cause of a wide array of fibroinflammatory lesions in the lung has not panned out as promised. To the contrary, it has become clear that IgG4-positive plasma cells are not specific for IgG4-RD, and that large numbers of IgG4-positive plasma cells can be encountered in other well-defined entities, including inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor and nodular lymphoid hyperplasia, as well as in lymphoplasmacytic infiltrates in other entities, including connective tissue disease and idiopathic forms of interstitial lung disease. It has also become clear that raised serum IgG4 levels can occur in settings other than IgG4-RD. These observations suggest that true IgG4-RD of the lung is far less common than previously surmised. Pathologists must familiarize themselves with mimics of IgG4-RD in the lung and exercise caution before attributing lymphoplasmacytic infiltrates in the lung to IgG4-RD.

IgG4-related disease (IgG4-RD) is a relatively novel fibroinflammatory condition characterized typically by dense lymphoplasmacytic inflammation, storiform fibrosis and obliterative venulitis, together with prominent IgG4+ plasma cells and an IgG4+/IgG+ plasma cell ratio of >40 %. The diagnosis is usually made on a combination of clinical and serological features together with characteristic radiological and histological appearances. The condition may be limited to a single tissue/organ (e.g., autoimmune pancreatitis) or may be multicentric in nature – four clinical ‘patterns’ of disease distribution have recently been described. The diagnosis of IgG4-RD can be challenging, particularly when the clinical presentation is unusual and/or when the histological features are not typical. A diagnosis of IgG4-RD may still be achieved in these situations, after careful clinicopathological discussion e.g., at a specialist multidisciplinary team meeting. However, a wide range of other conditions (neoplastic and non-neoplastic) can mimic IgG4-RD, clinically and/or on histological examination. The relationship between IgG4-RD and non-IgG4-RD associated conditions in some clinical situations is particularly complex. This review describes the role of histological examination in the diagnosis of IgG4-RD, discusses some of the practical difficulties that may be encountered and provides an insight into the range of non-IgG4-RD associated conditions that can mimic IgG4-RD on clinical and/or histological grounds. The requirement for interpretation of histological features in the context of the global clinical picture of the patient is highlighted and emphasized.