Journal of Wound Ostomy and Continence Nursing最新文献

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to describe characteristics of patients admitted from 2017 to 2021 with peripheral arterial disease (PAD) who required a below knee amputation (BKA) or above knee amputation (AKA), including present on admission pressure injuries (POA-PIs).

Design: Descriptive, cross-sectional retrospective research design.

Subjects and setting: The sample comprised 196 patients who underwent 258 major lower limb amputations. A majority (65.9 %n = 170) underwent BKAs and 88 (34.1 %) underwent AKAs. Coronary artery disease was present in 107 (54.6 %) and 143 (73.0%) had diabetes mellitus. The study site was a 670-bed level 1 trauma center in the Mid-Atlantic region of the United States.

Methods: A retrospective chart review of patients undergoing major lower limb amputations using CPT codes 27880 BKA, and 27590 AKA was completed. Variables extracted included age, sex, race, and comorbid conditions such as smoking, cardiovascular disease, diabetes mellitus, end stage renal disease requiring dialysis, and POA-PI. Descriptive statistics (frequencies, percentages, and means) were used to describe the sample.

Results: There were 25 (12.8%) individuals with POA-PI compared with 171 (87.2%) who did not have POA-PI. None of the characteristics reviewed significantly differed when patients with or without POA-PI were compared. Age was closest to statistical significance ( P = .052). In addition, analysis revealed that 73% (n = 143) of individuals had diabetes mellitus in addition to having PAD.

Conclusion: Approximately 13% of a group of patients with PAD had POA-PI when admitted to hospital for major limb amputation. Analysis of multiple factors found that none significantly differed between patients with or without POA-PI. Age came nearest to statistical significance and we hypothesize that older age may increase the risk for POA-PI; additional research in samples with greater power to detect this effect are needed. Findings also indicate that diabetes mellitus is a common risk factor for major lower limb amputation. It is important to educate staff/patients/caregivers on the importance of PI prevention especially in the elderly vascular population who are at risk for undergoing major lower limb amputations.

Purpose: The aim of the study was to determine the clinical value of using a powered alternating pressure air mattress (P-APAM) in the prevention of pressure injury (PI) in patients at medium to high risk.

Design: Noncomparative, observational study.

Subjects and setting: The sample comprised 86 patients who were >18 years old, were classified as having medium to high risk of PI, had no PI at baseline, and were lying more than 15 hours a day on a specific P-APAM. Data were collected between September 2018 and July 2019, in 4 nursing homes, and 1 long-term care geriatrics hospital department in France.

Methods: In addition to guideline-based care for PI prevention, patients were followed up for 35 days following placement on the P-APAM. The main outcome was the percentage of patients who developed between day 0 and day 35 at least 1 PI of at least stage 2 on the sacrum, spine, or heel. Secondary outcomes were patient assessments of comfort, caregiver satisfaction, mattress noise level, and mattress safety.

Results: No patients experienced a PI (incidence = 0%; 95% confidence interval, 0.00%-4.28%). Patients were satisfied or very satisfied with the mattress in most cases in terms of comfort (77.9%) and stability (73.0%). Patients also rated the noise level of the mattress as satisfactory or very satisfactory in all cases (100%).

Conclusion: When combined with guideline-based PI prevention measures, use of the P-APAM was associated with a low incidence of PI.

Background: Medical adhesive-related skin injuries (MARSIs) are prevalent adverse effects associated with use of medical devices and increasingly recognized as potentially avoidable. Despite advances in preventive measures, MARSI events still occur, and individualized care must be designed to meet patient needs.

Cases: This article describes three cases where skin injuries occurred because of application, removal, and ongoing use of a medical adhesive device; all three cases occurred underneath dressings used to secure and protect the skin adjacent to a peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC). The first case describes evaluation and management of a skin tear in an elderly female with multiple comorbid conditions, and Case 2 describes assessment and care of contact irritant dermatitis occurring under a PICC dressing. In both cases, specialist nurses with knowledge of MARSI assessed and managed the skin underneath the medical adhesive device in a manner that allowed maintenance of the PICC and continuation of therapy. In contrast, Case 3 describes a female with irritant contact dermatitis underneath a PICC dressing that was responding to care by the nurse specialists of a vascular access team. In this case, the patient presented to their facility's emergency department with severe itching. The vascular access team initially was not consulted, and the PICC line was removed, although inspection revealed dry skin without signs of infection.

Conclusions: Medical adhesive-related skin injury is a clinically relevant and useful construct that identifies a variety of prevalent conditions associated with the use of medical adhesive device such as tapes and PICC dressings. These cases, in particular Cases 1 and 2, illustrate that the MARSI construct provides a framework for assessing and managing medical skin injuries with the possibility of preserving the PICC and the ongoing therapy these patients were receiving.

Purpose: The purpose of this research was to develop the Satisfaction Concerning Stoma Care Questionnaire (SSCQ) and evaluate its structural and convergent validity and internal reliability.

Design: Instrument development and evaluation of validity and reliability.

Subjects and setting: A preliminary 22-item SSCQ was administered in a larger web-based survey to members of 2 ostomy-related patient associations with members throughout the Netherlands. The data of patients who underwent surgery within 2 years were selected for analysis.

Methods: The development of the SSCQ was informed by a preexisting survey that focused on the experiences of stoma patients with general health care. Structural validity and homogeneity of the SSCQ were assessed using explanatory factor analysis and Cronbach's α coefficients. Convergent validity was also evaluated.

Results: The final SSCQ comprised 20 items covering 3 domains: "preoperative care and information," "postoperative care and guidance," and "contact with and ostomy nurse." The SSCQ demonstrated structural and convergent validity and internal reliability. The Cronbach's α value of the SSCQ was 0.95, whereas the independent domains retrieved a high α coefficient ranging from 0.90 to 0.93. The SSCQ and independent domains were able to distinguish between high and low patients' ratings for satisfaction concerning the received stoma care.

Conclusions: The SSCQ demonstrated structural and convergent reliability, along with internal consistency. It may be used to measure the satisfaction of patients with ostomies concerning stoma care. Future prospective studies using the SSCQ are needed to generate additional insights into providing optimal care for ostomy patients.