Journal of Wound Ostomy and Continence Nursing最新文献

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to examine the prevalence of urinary (UI), fecal (FI), and dual incontinence (DI) in older adults and their association with urinary tract infections, dermatitis, slips and falls, and behavioral disturbances based on Medicare fee-for-service (FFS) claims data.

Design: Retrospective analysis.

Subjects and settings: Data from administrative claims from the CMS Medicare Limited Data Set (5% sample) for all months in 2018 were reviewed. The analysis was limited to FFS Medicare beneficiaries, with minimum of 3-month enrollment in Parts A and B who were at least 65 years old. This cohort included 1.2 million beneficiaries in the United States.

Methods: We used diagnosis codes to identify members with incontinence and grouped these members into 3 categories (UI only, FI only, and DI). We also divided claims based on 4 sites of care (nursing home, skilled nursing facility, home health, and self- or family care). We then determined the prevalence of (1) urinary tract infections (UTIs), (2) dermatitis, (3) slips and falls, and (4) behavioral disturbances for each type of incontinence.

Results: We found that 11.2% of Medicare members had a claims-based diagnosis of incontinence in 2018. On average, those diagnosed with incontinence experienced 5 times more UTIs, 2 times as many dermatitis events, more than twice as many slips and falls, and 2.8 times more behavior disturbances compared to those without an incontinence diagnosis. For those with DI, the prevalence of the 4 outcomes was significantly higher (between 22% and 185%) compared to those with UI only.

Conclusions: Findings show that Medicare beneficiaries diagnosed as incontinent experience a much higher prevalence of UTIs, dermatitis, slips and falls, and behavioral disturbances compared to those without a diagnosis of incontinence. Our results suggest that incontinence may be an important indicator diagnosis for multiple other conditions and, if not well-managed, may challenge the desire for those who are incontinent to age at home.

Purpose: The primary aims of this study were to evaluate the prevalence of wound-related pain (WRP) in patients with chronic wounds and assess the use of pain relief measures.

Design: A cross-sectional study.

Subjects and setting: A convenience sample of patients with chronic wounds was recruited from outpatient clinics of 12 hospitals covering 7 of 13 cities in the Jiangsu province located in eastern China from July 10 to August 25, 2020. The sample comprised 451 respondents, and their mean age was 54.85 (SD 19.16) years; 56.1% (253/451) patients were male.

Methods: An investigator-designed questionnaire was used to collect pain-related information from patients. The questionnaire consisted of 4 parts: (1) basic demographic and clinical information (patient and wound characteristics); (2) wound baseline pain; (3) wound-related procedural pain and pain relief method; and (4) the effect of WRP on the patient. Pain was assessed using the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) scored from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain). Severity of pain was based on NRS scores' classification as mild (1-3), moderate (4-6), and severe (7-10). The survey was conducted from July 10 to August 25, 2020. Participants were instructed on use of the NRS and then completed the questionnaire following dressing change independently.

Results: The 3 most common types of chronic wounds were traumatic ulcers, surgical wounds, and venous leg ulcers. The 3 most prevalent locations were lower limbs, feet, and thorax/abdomen. Of all patients, 62.5% (282/451) and 93.8% (423/451) patients experienced wound baseline pain and wound-related procedural pain, respectively. The mean score of wound baseline pain was 3.76 (SD 1.60) indicating moderate pain. During wound management, the highest pain score was 6.45 (SD 2.75) indicating severe pain; the most severe pain scores were associated with debridement. The use of drugs to relieve wound pain was low, while the use of nondrug-based analgesia was relatively high. Because of WRP, patients with chronic wounds feared dressing changes, hesitated to move, and showed a decline in sleep quality.

Conclusions: Wound baseline pain and wound-related procedural pain were very common in patients with chronic wounds. In the future, targeted intervention plans should be developed by combining drug-based and nondrug-based analgesia according to pain severity.

Purpose: The purpose of this quality improvement project was to provide a standardized, repeatable, and easy-to-use process for selecting a support surface for prevention or treatment of pressure injuries (PIs).

Participants and setting: The Wound, Ostomy, and Continence Nurses Society Support Surface Algorithm was chosen to guide clinicians in selection of an appropriate support surface. These clinicians provide services to approximately 465,000 patients across the nation annually.

Approach: This quality improvement project aimed to establish clinician knowledge and comfort levels when recommending a support surface and providing a standardized way to identify the appropriate support surface once a patient had been identified as at risk. The support surface algorithm was incorporated into our agency's electronic medical record (EMR); we chose this interactive algorithm to facilitate support surface selection among clinicians with no specialized expertise in PI treatment or prevention.

Outcomes: Clinicians reported an increase in knowledge and comfort levels in the ability to select an appropriate support surface following implementation of the clinical decision support tool. Benchmarking data illustrated a decrease in the year over year aggregate (September 2018 to September 2021) trending for the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services quality outcome measures surrounding potentially avoidable events related to PIs.

Implications for practice: Implementing the support surface algorithm assisted clinicians with support surface selection, elevated and standardized clinician practice, and reduced potentially avoidable events. As a result of this project, the Wound, Ostomy, and Continence Nurses Society Support Surface Algorithm Tool has been fully integrated into our EMR and is a standardized part of our clinical assessment.

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate how bladder care at night correlates to patients' mobility status.

Design: This was an observational study.

Subjects and setting: The sample comprises 63 aged care subacute patients who were observed over 3 consecutive nights in an inpatient subacute aged care ward located in Melbourne, Australia. Half of the participants were female; their mean age was 82.0 (standard deviation 8.2) years. Data were collected from December 2020 to March 2021.

Methods: Outcome variables included demographic and pertinent clinical characteristics, type and timing of toileting and/or bladder care provided, and mobility classification. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize the frequency of nocturnal bladder care provided each night and as a mean over the 3 nights. The relationship between the type of care units provided and other variables was explored using a 1-way analysis of variance; values ≤.05 were deemed statistically significant.

Results: Findings indicate that 27% (n = 17), 41% (n = 26), and 48% (n = 30) of participants required assistance to move in bed, sit up in bed, and stand from sitting, respectively. Care episodes for both incontinence and assistance with voiding were significantly associated with functional mobility in bed ( F = 5.52, P < .001; F = 2.14, P = .02) and with ambulation independence ( F = 3.52, P = .001; F = 2.04, P = .03) but not with age or ambulation distance.

Conclusions: Care provided for urinary incontinence during the night was related to the need for physical support of ambulation and poor mobility in bed. Targeted input from a multidisciplinary team is warranted to facilitate change of practice at night.

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the benefits of collaborative management between orthopedic surgery and WOC nurses in patients undergoing resection of subcutaneous sarcomas.

Design: Retrospective case-control study.

Subjects and setting: The sample comprised 25 patients who underwent wide resection for soft tissue sarcoma, followed by 2-stage split-thickness skin grafting. Data collection occurred between January 2015 and April 2021 in a university hospital based in Kagoshima, Japan. For comparison, we categorized these patients into 2 groups: intervention group participants were managed by an orthopedic surgeon and a WOC nurse; nonintervention group members were managed without WOC nurse participation.

Methods: Patient background and treatment-related information was retrospectively collected from medical records and compared between the WOC nurse intervention group and the nonintervention group, including maximum tumor diameter, surgical time, maximum skin defect diameter, length of hospital stay, and time from surgery to complete wound healing.

Results: The average length of hospital stay was significantly shorter in the WOC nurse intervention group compared with the nonintervention group (38.3 days, SD = 8.0 vs 47.1 days, SD = 10.2; P = .023).

Conclusion: Collaborative wound management with a WOC nurse resulted in a shorter hospital length of stay when compared to traditional management with WOC nurse involvement. Based on these findings, we assert that WOC nurses provide an important bridge between postoperative wound management in patients undergoing resection of subcutaneous sarcomas.

Purpose: The purpose of this quality improvement (QI) project was to provide an innovative, participatory approach to the education of staff nurses and nursing support personnel to improve skills and competencies in wound and ostomy care while enhancing staff engagement and empowerment.

Participants and setting: Project planning occurred between January and October 2020 and implementation began in November 2020. The project was implemented in 1 intensive care unit and 6 adult medical-surgical units of a 288-bed community hospital in the northeastern United States (Bronxville, New York). Participants included RNs and nursing support staff working in intensive care and medical-surgical units. A postimplementation survey was conducted in May 2021.

Approach: The Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) model was used as a framework for this QI intervention. A peer-to-peer approach to staff education addressing different learning styles was used to improve knowledge and competencies of staff nurses pertaining to wound and ostomy care.

Outcomes: There were 72 participants; 68% (n = 49) exhibited knowledge retention 5 months after initial participation; 85% (n = 61) reported a high level of engagement; and 97.5% (n = 70) reported a high level of satisfaction 5 months after project implementation.

Implications for practice: An emerging need exists for educational innovation regarding wound and ostomy care to improve quality of care, nursing care outcomes, and staff engagement. Through a peer-to-peer approach to wound and ostomy care education, enhanced clinical knowledge and competencies can result in improved patient safety and increase care outcomes.