This work develops a predictive model to identify potential targets of activist investment funds, which strategically acquire significant corporate stakes to drive operational and strategic improvements and enhance shareholder value. Predicting these targets is crucial for companies to mitigate intervention risks, for activists to select optimal targets, and for investors to capitalize on associated stock price gains. Our analysis utilizes data from the Russell 3000 index from 2016 to 2022. We tested 123 variations of models using different data imputation, oversampling, and machine learning methods, achieving a top AUC-ROC of 0.782. This demonstrates the model's effectiveness in identifying likely targets of activist funds. We applied the Shapley value method to determine the most influential factors in a company's susceptibility to activist investment. This interpretative approach provides clear insights into the driving forces behind activist targeting. Our model offers stakeholders a strategic tool for proactive corporate governance and investment strategy, enhancing understanding of the dynamics of activist investing.
{"title":"Interpretable Machine Learning Models for Predicting the Next Targets of Activist Funds","authors":"Minwu Kim","doi":"arxiv-2404.16169","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2404.16169","url":null,"abstract":"This work develops a predictive model to identify potential targets of\u0000activist investment funds, which strategically acquire significant corporate\u0000stakes to drive operational and strategic improvements and enhance shareholder\u0000value. Predicting these targets is crucial for companies to mitigate\u0000intervention risks, for activists to select optimal targets, and for investors\u0000to capitalize on associated stock price gains. Our analysis utilizes data from\u0000the Russell 3000 index from 2016 to 2022. We tested 123 variations of models\u0000using different data imputation, oversampling, and machine learning methods,\u0000achieving a top AUC-ROC of 0.782. This demonstrates the model's effectiveness\u0000in identifying likely targets of activist funds. We applied the Shapley value\u0000method to determine the most influential factors in a company's susceptibility\u0000to activist investment. This interpretative approach provides clear insights\u0000into the driving forces behind activist targeting. Our model offers\u0000stakeholders a strategic tool for proactive corporate governance and investment\u0000strategy, enhancing understanding of the dynamics of activist investing.","PeriodicalId":501139,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - QuantFin - Statistical Finance","volume":"5 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140797866","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
The increasing use of cryptoassets for international remittances has proven to be faster and more cost-effective, particularly for migrants without access to traditional banking. However, the inherent volatility of cryptoasset prices, independent of blockchain-based remittance mechanisms, introduces potential risks during periods of high volatility. This study investigates the intricate dynamics between XRP price fluctuations across diverse crypto exchanges and the correlation of the largest singular values of the correlation tensor of XRP transaction networks. Particularly, we show the impact of arbitrage opportunities across different crypto exchanges on the relationship between XRP price and correlation tensor spectra of transaction networks. Distinct periods, non-bubble and bubble, showcase different characteristics in XRP price fluctuations. Establishing a connection between XRP price and transaction networks, we compute correlation tensors and singular values, emphasizing the significance of the largest singular value. Comparisons with reshuffled and Gaussian random correlation tensors validate the uniqueness of the empirical tensor. A set of simulated weekly XRP prices, resembling arbitrage opportunities across various crypto exchanges, further confirms the robustness of our findings. It reveals a pronounced anti-correlation during bubble periods and a non-significant correlation during non-bubble periods with the largest singular value, irrespective of price fluctuations across different crypto exchanges.
{"title":"Arbitrage impact on the relationship between XRP price and correlation tensor spectra of transaction networks","authors":"Abhijit Chakraborty, Yuichi Ikeda","doi":"arxiv-2405.00051","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2405.00051","url":null,"abstract":"The increasing use of cryptoassets for international remittances has proven\u0000to be faster and more cost-effective, particularly for migrants without access\u0000to traditional banking. However, the inherent volatility of cryptoasset prices,\u0000independent of blockchain-based remittance mechanisms, introduces potential\u0000risks during periods of high volatility. This study investigates the intricate\u0000dynamics between XRP price fluctuations across diverse crypto exchanges and the\u0000correlation of the largest singular values of the correlation tensor of XRP\u0000transaction networks. Particularly, we show the impact of arbitrage\u0000opportunities across different crypto exchanges on the relationship between XRP\u0000price and correlation tensor spectra of transaction networks. Distinct periods,\u0000non-bubble and bubble, showcase different characteristics in XRP price\u0000fluctuations. Establishing a connection between XRP price and transaction\u0000networks, we compute correlation tensors and singular values, emphasizing the\u0000significance of the largest singular value. Comparisons with reshuffled and\u0000Gaussian random correlation tensors validate the uniqueness of the empirical\u0000tensor. A set of simulated weekly XRP prices, resembling arbitrage\u0000opportunities across various crypto exchanges, further confirms the robustness\u0000of our findings. It reveals a pronounced anti-correlation during bubble periods\u0000and a non-significant correlation during non-bubble periods with the largest\u0000singular value, irrespective of price fluctuations across different crypto\u0000exchanges.","PeriodicalId":501139,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - QuantFin - Statistical Finance","volume":"9 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140832985","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
M&A activities are pivotal for market consolidation, enabling firms to augment market power through strategic complementarities. Existing research often overlooks the peer effect, the mutual influence of M&A behaviors among firms, and fails to capture complex interdependencies within industry networks. Common approaches suffer from reliance on ad-hoc feature engineering, data truncation leading to significant information loss, reduced predictive accuracy, and challenges in real-world application. Additionally, the rarity of M&A events necessitates data rebalancing in conventional models, introducing bias and undermining prediction reliability. We propose an innovative M&A