Journal of Neuroscience Nursing最新文献

Abstract: BACKGROUND: Older people with debilitating degenerative spine disease may benefit from surgery. However, recovery is described as a circuitous process. In general, they describe feeling powerless and receiving depersonalized care during hospitalization. Institution of hospital no-visitor policies to reduce COVID-19 spread may have caused additional negative consequences. The purpose of this secondary analysis was to understand experiences of older people who underwent spine surgery during early COVID-19. METHODS: Grounded theory guided this study of people 65 years or older undergoing elective spine surgery. Fourteen individuals were recruited for 2 in-depth interviews at 2 time points: T1 during hospitalization and T2, 1 to 3 months post discharge. All participants were affected by pandemic-imposed restrictions with 4 interviews at T1 with no visitors, 10 with a 1-visitor policy, and 6 interviews at T2 rehabilitation setting with no visitors. Discriminate sampling of data in which participants described their experiences with COVID-19 visitor restrictions was used. Open and axial coding (consistent with grounded theory) was used for data analysis. RESULTS: Three categories, worry and waiting , being alone , and being isolated , emerged from the data. Participants had delays ( waiting ) in getting their surgery scheduled, which produced worry that they would lose more function, become permanently disabled, have increased pain, and experience more complications such as falls. Participants described being alone during their hospital and rehabilitation recovery, without physical or emotional support from family and limited nursing staff contact. Being isolated often occurred from institution policy, restricting participants to their rooms leading to boredom and, for some, panic. CONCLUSIONS: Restricted access to family after spine surgery and during recovery resulted in emotional and physical burden for participants. Our findings support neuroscience nurses advocating for family/care partner integration into patient care delivery and investigation into the effect of system-level policies on patient care and outcomes.

Abstract: BACKGROUND: Multiple sclerosis (MS) is the most common nontraumatic debilitating disease in young adults. This study aimed to determine the effect of distance empowerment programs on self-efficacy in MS patients. METHODS: Sixty-four MS patients participated in this quasi-experimental study. Patients were first entered into the study using the convenience sampling method and then were randomly allocated to control (32) and intervention (32) groups. The intervention group underwent a distance empowerment program (via WhatsApp, Telegram, and blog) and weekly telephone follow-up for 2 months. Self-efficacy was evaluated before, and immediately after, the empowerment program using the MS Self-Efficacy Scale. RESULTS : Data from 59 participants were analyzed. Before implementation of the empowerment program, the mean scores of self-efficacy in the intervention and control groups were not significantly different. After implementing the empowerment program, the mean score of self-efficacy in the intervention group was higher than that of the control group ( P < .05). CONCLUSION : Distance empowerment has an effect on the self-efficacy of patients with MS and may lead to an increase in self-efficacy scores after implementing an empowerment program.

Abstract: BACKGROUND: Discussions during the 2022 International Neuroscience Nursing Research Symposium highlighted the impact of family in the care of neuroscience patients. This sparked conversations about the need for understanding global differences in family involvement in the care of patients with neurological conditions. METHODS: Neuroscience nurses from Germany, India, Japan, Kenya, Singapore, Saudi Arabia, the United States, and Vietnam collaborated to provide a short summary of family involvement in caring for patients with neurological conditions in their respective countries. RESULTS: Family roles for neuroscience patients vary across the globe. Caring for neuroscience patients can be challenging. Family involvement in treatment decisions and patient care can be affected by sociocultural beliefs and practices, economic factors, hospital policies, manifestation of the disease, and long-term care requirements. CONCLUSION: Understanding the geographic, cultural, and sociopolitical implications of family involvement in care is of benefit to neuroscience nurses.

Abstract: BACKGROUND: Delirium is associated with worse outcomes, but there is a gap in literature identifying nurse-led interventions to reduce delirium in postoperative (postop) surgical spine patients. Because family presence has been associated with a variety of beneficial effects, we aimed to examine whether family presence in the spine intensive care unit (ICU) during the night after surgery was associated with less confusion or delirium on postop day 1. METHODS: This is a prospective nonrandomized pilot clinical trial with pragmatic sampling. Group designation was assigned by natural history. The family-present group was designated as patients for whom a family member remained present during the first night after surgery. The unaccompanied group was designated as patients who did not have a family member stay the night. Data include the Richmond Agitation Sedation Scale, the Confusion Assessment Method for the ICU, the 4AT (Alertness, Attention, Abbreviated mental test, and Acute change) score, and confusion measured with the orientation item on the Glasgow Coma Scale. Baseline data were collected after admission to the spine ICU and compared with the same data collected in the morning of postop day 1. RESULTS: At baseline, 5 of 16 patients in the family-present group (31.3%) had at least 1 incidence of delirium or confusion. Similarly, 6 of 14 patients in the unaccompanied group (42.9%) had at least 1 incidence of delirium or confusion. There was a clinically relevant, but not statistically significant, reduction in postop day 1 delirium or confusion comparing the family-present (6.3%) and unaccompanied (21.4%) groups ( P = .23). CONCLUSION: Family presence may reduce delirium and confusion for patients after spine surgery. The results support continued research into examining nurse-led interventions to reduce delirium and improve outcomes for this population.

Abstract: PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to identify the learning needs of spinal surgery patients before hospital discharge. METHODS: This cross-sectional study consisted of 117 spinal surgery patients admitted to the neurosurgery department between October 2019 and March 2020. Data were collected using a descriptive information form, visual analog scale, and the Patient Learning Needs Scale. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, Mann-Whitney U and Kruskal-Wallis tests, and Spearman correlation analysis. RESULTS: The mean age of the participants was 54 years, 54.7% were male, and 59% underwent surgery because of spinal disc herniation. The mean Patient Learning Needs Scale score was 188.74. The primary learning needs of the patients were related to the dimensions of activities of living, medication, treatment, and complications, whereas the feelings related to condition were the least-demanded dimension of learning needs. Sex and occupation were the primary factors influencing learning needs. CONCLUSION: The level of learning needs in spinal surgery patients was relatively high. Therefore, discharge education may be planned in line with the learning needs and priorities of these patients, and sex and occupation may be considered while planning discharge education.

Abstract: BACKGROUND: Nationwide nursing shortages have spurred nursing research on burnout and resiliency to better understand the emotional health of nurses and allied staff to retain talent. Our institution implemented resilience rooms in the neuroscience units of our hospital. The goal of this study was to evaluate the effects of resilience room use on emotional distress among staff. METHODS: Resilience rooms opened to staff in the neuroscience tower in January 2021. Entrances were electronically captured via badge readers. Upon exit, staff completed a survey containing items on demographics, burnout, and emotional distress. RESULTS: Resilience rooms were used 1988 times, and 396 surveys were completed. Rooms were most used by intensive care unit nurses (40.1% of entrances), followed by nurse leaders (28.8%). Staff with >10 years of experience accounted for 50.8% of uses. One-third reported moderate burnout, and 15.9% reported heavy or extreme burnout. Overall, emotional distress decreased by 49.4% from entrance to exit. The greatest decreases in distress were recorded by those with the lowest levels of burnout (72.5% decrease). CONCLUSION: Resilience room use was associated with significant decreases in emotional distress. The greatest decreases occurred with the lowest levels of burnout, suggesting that early engagement with resilience rooms is most beneficial.

Abstract: BACKGROUND: Distinguishing features of our stroke network include routine involvement of a telestroke nurse (TSRN) for code stroke activations at nonthrombectomy centers and immediate availability of neuroradiologists for imaging interpretation. On May 1, 2021, we implemented a new workflow for code stroke activations presenting beyond 4.5 hours from last known well that relied on a TSRN supported by a neuroradiologist for initial triage. Patients without a target large vessel occlusion (LVO) were managed without routine involvement of a teleneurologist, which represented a change from the preimplementation period. METHODS: We collected data 6 months before and after implementation of the new workflow. We compared preimplementation process metrics for patients managed with teleneurologist involvement with the postimplementation patients managed without teleneurologist involvement. RESULTS: With the new workflow, teleneurologist involvement decreased from 95% (n = 953) for patients presenting beyond 4.5 hours from last known well to 37% (n = 373; P < .001). Compared with patients in the preimplementation period, postimplementation patients without teleneurologist involvement experienced less inpatient hospital admission and observation (87% vs 90%; unadjusted P = .038, adjusted P = .06). Among the preimplementation and postimplementation admitted patients, there was no statistically significant difference in follow-up neurology consultation or nonstroke diagnoses. A similar percentage of LVO patients were transferred to the thrombectomy center (54% pre vs 49% post, P = .612), whereas more LVO transfers in the postimplementation cohort received thrombectomy therapy (75% post vs 39% pre, P = .014). Among LVO patients (48 pre and 41 post), no statistical significance was observed in imaging and management times. CONCLUSION: Our work shows the successful teaming of a TSRN and a neuroradiologist to triage acute stroke patients who present beyond an eligibility window for systemic thrombolysis, without negatively impacting care and process metrics. This innovative partnering may help to preserve the availability of teleneurologists by limiting their involvement when diagnostic imaging drives decision making.