Journal of Heart Valve Disease最新文献

Background: Pulmonary autograft dilatation after Ross operation often necessitates reoperation. To understand autograft remodeling, a biomechanical understanding of human autografts after exposure to systemic pressure is required. We previously developed an ex vivo human pulmonary autograft finite element (FE) model to predict wall stress after exposure to systemic pressure. However, autograft material properties vary significantly among individuals. Our study aim was to quantify range of wall stress changes in a human autograft after Ross operation prior to remodeling based upon normal variation in human autograft mechanical properties.

Methods: A normal human autograft FE model was loaded to pulmonary and systemic arterial pressures. Stress-strain data of normal human autografts (n=24) were incorporated into an Ogden hyper-elastic model to describe autograft mechanical behavior. Autograft wall stresses at pulmonary vs. systemic pressures were examined. Autograft volume-based stress analysis was performed, based on percentage of autograft element volume exceeding 1 standard deviation (SD) above group mean stress at systemic systole.

Results: Mean first principal wall stresses (FPS) at systole of systemic versus pulmonary pressures were 129.29±17.47kPa versus 24.42±3.85kPa (p<0.001) at the annulus, 187.53±20.06kPa versus 35.98±2.15kPa at sinuses (p<0.001), and 268.68±23.40kPa versus 50.15±5.90kPa (p<0.001) at sinotubuluar junction (STJ). The percentage of autograft element volume that exceeded one SD above the group mean was 14.3±5.6% for FPS and 12.6±10.1% for second principal stresses.

Conclusion: We quantified normal human autograft biomechanical responses to systemic pressure based on patient-specific material properties. Regions of peak stresses were observed in autograft sinuses and STJ regions, which corresponded clinically to locations of autograft dilation. Our results provide valuable information on predicting variations in patient-specific ex vivo FE models when population-based material properties are used in settings where patient-specific properties are unknown.

Background: Coronary revascularization with bilateral internal mammary arteries is associated with increased long-term survival, but underutilized due to sternal wound infection concerns. Dedicated bilateral mammary grafting programs are typically high-volume academic or private practices, rather than lower-volume federal institutions whose results are not captured in the Society of Thoracic Surgeons database. Our institution used only single internal mammary arterial grafting in the year prior to implementing a dedicated bilateral grafting program using skeletonized technique. We describe our experience transitioning to bilateral mammary grafting and its impact on sternal wound infection.

Methods: Retrospective cohort study at San Francisco Veterans Affairs Medical Center in 200 patients undergoing first-time isolated, multi-vessel coronary artery bypass from August 2014 to October 2017. Sternal wound infection was defined broadly to include any patient receiving antibiotics for suspicion of sternal infection. Patients were followed for wound complications until 3 post-operative months.

Results: Of 200 total patients, 45.5% (n=91) were diabetic, 44% (n=88) had BMI >30, and 61.5% (n=123) underwent bilateral mammary grafting. Bilateral mammary grafting population had 2.4% (n=3/123) deep sternal wound infection with 1.6% (n=2/123) requiring sternal reconstruction while single mammary population had 1.3% (n=1/77, p=1.0). Bilateral mammary grafting population had 6.5% (n=8/123) superficial sternal wound infection compared to 5.2% (n=4/77, p=0.77) in single mammary grafting population.

Conclusions: Transitioning to high rates of bilateral mammary utilization was possible in a year with low rates of complications. Based on our experience, surgeons should consider adopting a skeletonized bilateral mammary grafting approach given potential long-term survival benefit.