Pub Date : 2025-12-01eCollection Date: 2025-01-01DOI: 10.53854/liim-3304-1
Jhon Víctor Vidal-Durango, Johana Galván-Barrios, Juan David Reyes-Duque, Ivan David Lozada-Martinez
Neglected tropical diseases (NTDs) have been identified as a major global health burden, particularly in low- and middle-income countries, yet limited scientific attention has been given to them. Simultaneously, the emergence of Big Data and artificial intelligence has been transforming the way medical evidence is produced. Despite this, minimal integration between Big Data approaches and NTDs research has been observed. To explore this gap, a narrative review with a brief scientometrics analysis was conducted alongside a critical review of 13 original studies and systematic reviews that applied Big Data to NTDs. Studies were assessed according to design, objectives, disease focus, and geographic scope. Findings revealed a significant disparity: although extensive literature exists on Big Data and on NTDs separately, only a small number of studies combine both. Most of these were focused on dengue, with limited geographic representation and methodological consistency. These results suggest that the field remains underdeveloped and fragmented. Opportunities for interdisciplinary and data-intensive approaches have not been fully utilized. It is proposed that, by aligning Big Data applications with the new generation of the evidence-based medicine pyramid, more inclusive, predictive, and context-sensitive research on NTDs could be enabled, supporting equitable health decision-making in historically neglected populations.
{"title":"The Role of Big Data in Developing Innovative Predictive Learning Models for Neglected Tropical Diseases within the New Generation of the Evidence-Based Medicine Pyramid.","authors":"Jhon Víctor Vidal-Durango, Johana Galván-Barrios, Juan David Reyes-Duque, Ivan David Lozada-Martinez","doi":"10.53854/liim-3304-1","DOIUrl":"10.53854/liim-3304-1","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Neglected tropical diseases (NTDs) have been identified as a major global health burden, particularly in low- and middle-income countries, yet limited scientific attention has been given to them. Simultaneously, the emergence of Big Data and artificial intelligence has been transforming the way medical evidence is produced. Despite this, minimal integration between Big Data approaches and NTDs research has been observed. To explore this gap, a narrative review with a brief scientometrics analysis was conducted alongside a critical review of 13 original studies and systematic reviews that applied Big Data to NTDs. Studies were assessed according to design, objectives, disease focus, and geographic scope. Findings revealed a significant disparity: although extensive literature exists on Big Data and on NTDs separately, only a small number of studies combine both. Most of these were focused on dengue, with limited geographic representation and methodological consistency. These results suggest that the field remains underdeveloped and fragmented. Opportunities for interdisciplinary and data-intensive approaches have not been fully utilized. It is proposed that, by aligning Big Data applications with the new generation of the evidence-based medicine pyramid, more inclusive, predictive, and context-sensitive research on NTDs could be enabled, supporting equitable health decision-making in historically neglected populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":502111,"journal":{"name":"Le infezioni in medicina","volume":"33 4","pages":"355-369"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12695170/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145746455","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-01eCollection Date: 2025-01-01DOI: 10.53854/liim-3304-4
Marco Floridia, Liliana Elena Weimer, Aldo Lo Forte, Paolo Palange, Maria Rosa Ciardi, Patrizia Rovere-Querini, Piergiuseppe Agostoni, Emanuela Barisione, Silvia Zucco, Paola Andreozzi, Paolo Bonfanti, Stefano Figliozzi, Matteo Tosato, Donato Lacedonia, Kwelusukila Loso, Paola Gnerre, Maria Antonietta di Rosolini, Domenico Maurizio Toraldo, Giuseppe Pio Martino, Guido Vagheggini, Gianfranco Parati, Graziano Onder
Purpose: Some studies have suggested that therapeutic interventions able to mitigate the acute phase of COVID-19 can also reduce the risk of Long-COVID and its severity, but the issue is still controversial.
Methods: We examined in a national cohort of patients followed in Long-COVID centers the risk of persistent symptoms according to administration in acute COVID-19 of four drug classes: antivirals, IL-6 inhibitors, monoclonal neutralizing antibodies and systemic corticosteroids. Final risk estimates for 26 symptoms were expressed as adjusted odds ratios calculated in multivariable logistic regression models that included as covariates demographics, comorbidities, BMI, smoking, severity of acute disease, hospitalization, level of respiratory support, SARS-CoV-2 vaccination and treatments administered during acute infection.
Results: The final population included 1534 adult patients (mean age 60.3 years, 67.0% hospitalised during acute COVID-19). Treatments administered during acute phase included systemic steroids (52.8%), antivirals (20.7%, mostly remdesivir), IL-6 inhibitors (9.4%) and neutralizing antibodies (3.9%). After a mean interval of 338 days from acute COVID-19, 1181 patients (77.0%) presented persisting symptoms. For the drug classes considered, some protective associations were found in univariate analyses, that were however not maintained adjusting for confounders in multivariate analyses. Systemic corticosteroids and IL-6 inhibitors showed some negative associations with isolated symptoms.
Conclusions: Some drug classes showed a protective effect that was however not confirmed in multivariable analyses, underlining the importance of adjusting for a comprehensive number of covariates. Clinicians should consider the possibility that systemic corticosteroids and IL-6 inhibitors administered during acute COVID-19 may prolong the persistence of particular symptoms.
{"title":"Administration of antivirals, IL-6 inhibitors, monoclonal neutralizing antibodies and systemic corticosteroids in acute SARS-CoV-2 infection do not reduce the subsequent burden of Long-COVID symptoms.","authors":"Marco Floridia, Liliana Elena Weimer, Aldo Lo Forte, Paolo Palange, Maria Rosa Ciardi, Patrizia Rovere-Querini, Piergiuseppe Agostoni, Emanuela Barisione, Silvia Zucco, Paola Andreozzi, Paolo Bonfanti, Stefano Figliozzi, Matteo Tosato, Donato Lacedonia, Kwelusukila Loso, Paola Gnerre, Maria Antonietta di Rosolini, Domenico Maurizio Toraldo, Giuseppe Pio Martino, Guido Vagheggini, Gianfranco Parati, Graziano Onder","doi":"10.53854/liim-3304-4","DOIUrl":"10.53854/liim-3304-4","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Some studies have suggested that therapeutic interventions able to mitigate the acute phase of COVID-19 can also reduce the risk of Long-COVID and its severity, but the issue is still controversial.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We examined in a national cohort of patients followed in Long-COVID centers the risk of persistent symptoms according to administration in acute COVID-19 of four drug classes: antivirals, IL-6 inhibitors, monoclonal neutralizing antibodies and systemic corticosteroids. Final risk estimates for 26 symptoms were expressed as adjusted odds ratios calculated in multivariable logistic regression models that included as covariates demographics, comorbidities, BMI, smoking, severity of acute disease, hospitalization, level of respiratory support, SARS-CoV-2 vaccination and treatments administered during acute infection.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The final population included 1534 adult patients (mean age 60.3 years, 67.0% hospitalised during acute COVID-19). Treatments administered during acute phase included systemic steroids (52.8%), antivirals (20.7%, mostly remdesivir), IL-6 inhibitors (9.4%) and neutralizing antibodies (3.9%). After a mean interval of 338 days from acute COVID-19, 1181 patients (77.0%) presented persisting symptoms. For the drug classes considered, some protective associations were found in univariate analyses, that were however not maintained adjusting for confounders in multivariate analyses. Systemic corticosteroids and IL-6 inhibitors showed some negative associations with isolated symptoms.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Some drug classes showed a protective effect that was however not confirmed in multivariable analyses, underlining the importance of adjusting for a comprehensive number of covariates. Clinicians should consider the possibility that systemic corticosteroids and IL-6 inhibitors administered during acute COVID-19 may prolong the persistence of particular symptoms.</p>","PeriodicalId":502111,"journal":{"name":"Le infezioni in medicina","volume":"33 4","pages":"391-403"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12695160/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145746323","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-09-01eCollection Date: 2025-01-01DOI: 10.53854/liim-3303-9
Giulia Menotti, Maddalena Giglia, Niccolò Riccardi, Yacine Mar Diop, Mamadou Ndiaye, Lamin Gning, Mama Moussa Diaw, Giovanni Fumagalli, Laura Saderi, Giovanni Sotgiu, Giorgio Besozzi, Marina Tadolini
Background: The Coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic significantly impacted on tuberculosis (TB) services (TB) services in both high and low TB burden countries. Objectives: This study aimed to investigate the impact of COVID-19 on TB outpatient services in terms of new TB case notifications and treatment outcomes in a rural area of Senegal.
Methods: A retrospective observational study was conducted at the Health Care Centre of Diofior (HCD) in the Fimela district, Fatick Region (Senegal), covering the period from January 1st, 2018, to December 31st, 2022. Data were divided into pre-COVID-19 (until March 31st, 2020) and during-COVID-19 (from April 1st, 2020) periods for analysis.
Results: Among the 246 TB cases included (63.4% male, median age 38.4 years), 94 (38.2%) had been diagnosed in the pre-COVID-19 period and 152 (61.8%) in the during-COVID-19 period. In 2020, TB case notifications dropped by 24.4% compared to 2019, followed by an increase of 70.6% in 2021 and 91.2% in 2022. The TB treatment success rate decreased from 85.1% before COVID-19 to 77.6% in during-COVID-19 period. Moreover, mortality increased from 2.1% to 5.3%, and the lost-to-follow-up rate rose from 8.5% to 14.5% between the pre- and during-COVID-19 periods.
Conclusions: Although the number of COVID-19 cases reported in Senegal was relatively low in the study period compared to other settings, our study indicates that the pandemic had a significant impact on TB services in this rural area of Senegal.
{"title":"Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on tuberculosis services in a rural area of Senegal.","authors":"Giulia Menotti, Maddalena Giglia, Niccolò Riccardi, Yacine Mar Diop, Mamadou Ndiaye, Lamin Gning, Mama Moussa Diaw, Giovanni Fumagalli, Laura Saderi, Giovanni Sotgiu, Giorgio Besozzi, Marina Tadolini","doi":"10.53854/liim-3303-9","DOIUrl":"10.53854/liim-3303-9","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic significantly impacted on tuberculosis (TB) services (TB) services in both high and low TB burden countries. Objectives: This study aimed to investigate the impact of COVID-19 on TB outpatient services in terms of new TB case notifications and treatment outcomes in a rural area of Senegal.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective observational study was conducted at the Health Care Centre of Diofior (HCD) in the Fimela district, Fatick Region (Senegal), covering the period from January 1st, 2018, to December 31st, 2022. Data were divided into pre-COVID-19 (until March 31st, 2020) and during-COVID-19 (from April 1st, 2020) periods for analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 246 TB cases included (63.4% male, median age 38.4 years), 94 (38.2%) had been diagnosed in the pre-COVID-19 period and 152 (61.8%) in the during-COVID-19 period. In 2020, TB case notifications dropped by 24.4% compared to 2019, followed by an increase of 70.6% in 2021 and 91.2% in 2022. The TB treatment success rate decreased from 85.1% before COVID-19 to 77.6% in during-COVID-19 period. Moreover, mortality increased from 2.1% to 5.3%, and the lost-to-follow-up rate rose from 8.5% to 14.5% between the pre- and during-COVID-19 periods.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although the number of COVID-19 cases reported in Senegal was relatively low in the study period compared to other settings, our study indicates that the pandemic had a significant impact on TB services in this rural area of Senegal.</p>","PeriodicalId":502111,"journal":{"name":"Le infezioni in medicina","volume":"33 3","pages":"321-328"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12419176/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145042936","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Diphtheria is a serious and potentially fatal infection caused by Corynebacterium diphtheriae, which, before the introduction of universal vaccination, was the leading cause of illness and death among children and young adults, but which now causes sporadic but worrying outbreaks worldwide and not only among unvaccinated people. We narrate the first descriptions of the disease until the introduction of seroprophylaxis and vaccination as well as the spread, clinical expression and treatment of diphtheria in Ferrara, and in North-Eastern Upper Adriatic Sea. We also deal with the dramatic resurgence of disease in particular categories of people and in certain countries. The sources consulted were the Academy of Sciences of Ferrara, the Ariostea Municipal Library, periodicals of Trieste and literature books. In the period analyzed (1869-1898), 2794 people died in Ferrara, with a maximum of 44.24 per 10,000 inhabitants in 1883 and a minimum of 0.32 in 1898. Deaths from diphtheria were highly prevalent in the countryside compared to the cities (36% vs 23%, respectively); the female gender was most affected due the prolonged contact with sick people and unhealthy environments. Mortality was very high in those patients aged from 5 to 10 years and from 3 to 5 years, with a much lower percentage in the age groups between 1 to 3 and 10 to 15 years. Cauterization of tonsil plaques, brushing with hydrochloric acid, mucilaginous gargles, cinchona, astringent substances, were among the main remedies proposed by some distinguished academics of the time before the advent of serotherapy. Some authors were the first to describe the effects of post-diphtheria paralysis including phonation disorders. The academic Baldassari connected diphtheria trends to weather variations. In the Eastern Upper Adriatic region, diphtheria was such a threat in the last thirty years of the 19th century that it surpassed cholera and typhus in terms of mortality. The disease was more common in the coastal region than on the mainland. Istria, Koper, Poreč and Pula were the cities with the highest number of cases in 1871 and 1872. The disease hit hard between October 1894 and the first months of 1895. Prophylactic measures to combat the disease included closing schools, isolating the infected patients, and publishing recommendations text on school hygiene Diphtheria, although almost completely eradicated in most industrialized countries thanks to mass vaccination campaigns, remains endemic where inadequate vaccination policies, low socioeconomic status, inaccessibility to public health care, wars, displacement, migratory movements are present.
{"title":"Diphtheria: a serious asphyctic disease that reappears occasionally. Description of the disease in Northeastern Italy from the 16<sup>th</sup> century onwards.","authors":"Carlo Contini, Omar Simonetti, Matteo Alvino, Stefano Manfredini, Chiara Beatrice Vicentini","doi":"10.53854/liim-3303-13","DOIUrl":"10.53854/liim-3303-13","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Diphtheria is a serious and potentially fatal infection caused by <i>Corynebacterium diphtheriae</i>, which, before the introduction of universal vaccination, was the leading cause of illness and death among children and young adults, but which now causes sporadic but worrying outbreaks worldwide and not only among unvaccinated people. We narrate the first descriptions of the disease until the introduction of seroprophylaxis and vaccination as well as the spread, clinical expression and treatment of diphtheria in Ferrara, and in North-Eastern Upper Adriatic Sea. We also deal with the dramatic resurgence of disease in particular categories of people and in certain countries. The sources consulted were the Academy of Sciences of Ferrara, the Ariostea Municipal Library, periodicals of Trieste and literature books. In the period analyzed (1869-1898), 2794 people died in Ferrara, with a maximum of 44.24 per 10,000 inhabitants in 1883 and a minimum of 0.32 in 1898. Deaths from diphtheria were highly prevalent in the countryside compared to the cities (36% <i>vs</i> 23%, respectively); the female gender was most affected due the prolonged contact with sick people and unhealthy environments. Mortality was very high in those patients aged from 5 to 10 years and from 3 to 5 years, with a much lower percentage in the age groups between 1 to 3 and 10 to 15 years. Cauterization of tonsil plaques, brushing with hydrochloric acid, mucilaginous gargles, cinchona, astringent substances, were among the main remedies proposed by some distinguished academics of the time before the advent of serotherapy. Some authors were the first to describe the effects of post-diphtheria paralysis including phonation disorders. The academic Baldassari connected diphtheria trends to weather variations. In the Eastern Upper Adriatic region, diphtheria was such a threat in the last thirty years of the 19th century that it surpassed cholera and typhus in terms of mortality. The disease was more common in the coastal region than on the mainland. Istria, Koper, Poreč and Pula were the cities with the highest number of cases in 1871 and 1872. The disease hit hard between October 1894 and the first months of 1895. Prophylactic measures to combat the disease included closing schools, isolating the infected patients, and publishing recommendations text on school hygiene Diphtheria, although almost completely eradicated in most industrialized countries thanks to mass vaccination campaigns, remains endemic where inadequate vaccination policies, low socioeconomic status, inaccessibility to public health care, wars, displacement, migratory movements are present.</p>","PeriodicalId":502111,"journal":{"name":"Le infezioni in medicina","volume":"33 3","pages":"343-354"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12419174/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145042897","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-09-01eCollection Date: 2025-01-01DOI: 10.53854/liim-3303-5
Matteo Moroni, Raffaella Antonione, Eleonora Taddei, Luigi Patil, Massimo Fantoni
Background: Many patients receive antibiotics at the end of their lives: prudent use in this setting is essential to limit side effects and selective pressure. Evaluating benefits and harms of antibiotics in this context is complex, with many factors influencing final decisions, including transition to end-of-life care and diagnosis of impending death. We aimed to investigate attitudes towards antibiotic prescription among key specialists involved in end-of-life care, also as part of a consensus on antibiotic prescription at the end of life.
Materials and methods: An anonymous ten-question survey was conducted in January 2025, over a one-month period, on the websites of the Italian Society of Infectious and Tropical Diseases (SIMIT), the Italian Society of Palliative Care (SICP), the Italian Society of General Practitioners (SIMG), and the Italian Federation of Associations of Internal Medicine Physicians (FADOI), with a denominator of 9224 potential respondents. Specialists were invited to respond questions about usual practice with both end-stage oncological and non-oncological patients. A descriptive analysis of the aggregated data was performed.
Results: 880 physicians (9.5% of the denominator) participated (59.2% female), most working in hospitals (56.7%) and internal medicine departments (39.9%). A plurality (40.8%) had less than 10 years of work experience. Attitudes towards infection management and antibiotic prescription varied widely. More than half of the respondents reported treating infections differently in oncological versus non-oncological patients. Only a minority used antibiotics to treat respiratory secretions. Most could not rely on institutional guidelines for antibiotic prescription in terminally ill patients.
Conclusion: The attitude towards antibiotic prescription at the end of life is influenced by many factors, including the physician's background and setting. Case-by-case decision-making and advanced care planning could be significantly supported by guidelines based on studies that provide real-life data and effectively stratify patients and scenarios.
{"title":"Attitudes towards antibiotic use in end-of-life care: a nationwide Italian physician survey.","authors":"Matteo Moroni, Raffaella Antonione, Eleonora Taddei, Luigi Patil, Massimo Fantoni","doi":"10.53854/liim-3303-5","DOIUrl":"10.53854/liim-3303-5","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Many patients receive antibiotics at the end of their lives: prudent use in this setting is essential to limit side effects and selective pressure. Evaluating benefits and harms of antibiotics in this context is complex, with many factors influencing final decisions, including transition to end-of-life care and diagnosis of impending death. We aimed to investigate attitudes towards antibiotic prescription among key specialists involved in end-of-life care, also as part of a consensus on antibiotic prescription at the end of life.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>An anonymous ten-question survey was conducted in January 2025, over a one-month period, on the websites of the Italian Society of Infectious and Tropical Diseases (SIMIT), the Italian Society of Palliative Care (SICP), the Italian Society of General Practitioners (SIMG), and the Italian Federation of Associations of Internal Medicine Physicians (FADOI), with a denominator of 9224 potential respondents. Specialists were invited to respond questions about usual practice with both end-stage oncological and non-oncological patients. A descriptive analysis of the aggregated data was performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>880 physicians (9.5% of the denominator) participated (59.2% female), most working in hospitals (56.7%) and internal medicine departments (39.9%). A plurality (40.8%) had less than 10 years of work experience. Attitudes towards infection management and antibiotic prescription varied widely. More than half of the respondents reported treating infections differently in oncological versus non-oncological patients. Only a minority used antibiotics to treat respiratory secretions. Most could not rely on institutional guidelines for antibiotic prescription in terminally ill patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The attitude towards antibiotic prescription at the end of life is influenced by many factors, including the physician's background and setting. Case-by-case decision-making and advanced care planning could be significantly supported by guidelines based on studies that provide real-life data and effectively stratify patients and scenarios.</p>","PeriodicalId":502111,"journal":{"name":"Le infezioni in medicina","volume":"33 3","pages":"284-293"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12419175/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145042888","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-09-01eCollection Date: 2025-01-01DOI: 10.53854/liim-3303-4
Andrea De Vito, Agnese Colpani, Giulia Moi, Hélène Moné, Gabriel Mouahid, Daniela Fusco, Valentina Marchese, Giordano Madeddu, Joachim Richter
Introduction: Schistosoma (S.) haematobium is a widespread tropical helminthic zoonosis. Schistosomiasis was endemic in some foci in Southern Europe until the sixties of the last century. Autochthonous transmission of human schistosomiasis was first reported in the French island of Corsica in 2014, and the schistosome responsible for this emergence was also linked to partial hybridisation between S. haematobium and the bovine schistosome species S. bovis. Transmission has recently been retrospectively confirmed in southern Spain as well.
Risk of introduction of schistosomiasis to italy: The distance between southern Corsica and northern Sardinia is 12 km. The freshwater snail Bulinus (B.) truncatus, one of the intermediate mollusc hosts of S. haematobium, is known to be endemic in some regions of southern Europe, including Corsica, Spain, and Portugal, where it transmits the zoonotic S. bovis. B. truncatus appears still to be endemic in Sardinia and possibly also in Sicily. Furthermore, schistosomiasis of ungulates caused by S. bovis, transmitted by the same vector snail, also appears to be endemic in Sardinia. Migrant populations and returnees to Italy have been found to be infested with schistosomes, and tourism to local freshwater bodies is increasing.
Discussion and conclusions: There is a considerable potential risk of autochthonous schistosomiasis being introduced to Italy. Therefore, surveillance has to be intensified to prevent the establishment of an autochthonous transmission cycle of human schistosomiasis in Italy. Systematic screening strategies for individuals who have been possibly exposed to endemic areas need to be established. Curative treatment of identified cases is mandatory. Praziquantel, the drug of choice, needs to be readily available throughout Italy.Malacological surveillance of snail populations focusing on potential transmission sites is recommended. A one-health approach is recommended to verify the actual epidemiological situation of autochthonous S. bovis infestation and, thereby, to investigate the risk of establishing a zoonotic reservoir. Clinicians should be aware that, in some circumstances, schistosomiasis may occur in individuals who have never travelled to known endemic areas before.
{"title":"Risk of autochthonous human schistosomiasis transmission in Italy.","authors":"Andrea De Vito, Agnese Colpani, Giulia Moi, Hélène Moné, Gabriel Mouahid, Daniela Fusco, Valentina Marchese, Giordano Madeddu, Joachim Richter","doi":"10.53854/liim-3303-4","DOIUrl":"10.53854/liim-3303-4","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong><i>Schistosoma (S.) haematobium</i> is a widespread tropical helminthic zoonosis. Schistosomiasis was endemic in some foci in Southern Europe until the sixties of the last century. Autochthonous transmission of human schistosomiasis was first reported in the French island of Corsica in 2014, and the schistosome responsible for this emergence was also linked to partial hybridisation between <i>S. haematobium</i> and the bovine schistosome species <i>S. bovis</i>. Transmission has recently been retrospectively confirmed in southern Spain as well.</p><p><strong>Risk of introduction of schistosomiasis to italy: </strong>The distance between southern Corsica and northern Sardinia is 12 km. The freshwater snail Bulinus (B.) truncatus, one of the intermediate mollusc hosts of S. haematobium, is known to be endemic in some regions of southern Europe, including Corsica, Spain, and Portugal, where it transmits the zoonotic <i>S. bovis</i>. <i>B. truncatus</i> appears still to be endemic in Sardinia and possibly also in Sicily. Furthermore, schistosomiasis of ungulates caused by <i>S. bovis</i>, transmitted by the same vector snail, also appears to be endemic in Sardinia. Migrant populations and returnees to Italy have been found to be infested with schistosomes, and tourism to local freshwater bodies is increasing.</p><p><strong>Discussion and conclusions: </strong>There is a considerable potential risk of autochthonous schistosomiasis being introduced to Italy. Therefore, surveillance has to be intensified to prevent the establishment of an autochthonous transmission cycle of human schistosomiasis in Italy. Systematic screening strategies for individuals who have been possibly exposed to endemic areas need to be established. Curative treatment of identified cases is mandatory. Praziquantel, the drug of choice, needs to be readily available throughout Italy.Malacological surveillance of snail populations focusing on potential transmission sites is recommended. A one-health approach is recommended to verify the actual epidemiological situation of autochthonous <i>S. bovis</i> infestation and, thereby, to investigate the risk of establishing a zoonotic reservoir. Clinicians should be aware that, in some circumstances, schistosomiasis may occur in individuals who have never travelled to known endemic areas before.</p>","PeriodicalId":502111,"journal":{"name":"Le infezioni in medicina","volume":"33 3","pages":"279-283"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12419172/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145042912","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-09-01eCollection Date: 2025-01-01DOI: 10.53854/liim-3303-2
Nicholas Geremia, Stefano Di Bella
Pandoraea species are emerging Gram-negative non-fermenting pathogens increasingly associated with human infections, particularly in patients with cystic fibrosis, immunocompromised hosts, and critically ill individuals. These bacteria exhibit intrinsic multi-drug resistance (MDR), complicating treatment and management. A comprehensive literature search was conducted to identify relevant studies concerning Pandoraea infections on PubMed/MEDLINE/Google Scholar and books written by experts in microbiology and infectious diseases. Pandoraea isolates frequently demonstrate resistance to the most common antimicrobials, such as β-lactams, aminoglycosides, fluoroquinolones, and polymyxins. Interestingly, many strains retain susceptibility to imipenem (IMP) despite resistance to meropenem due to the production of specific oxacillinase-type β-lactamases (OXA) called OXA-1152. Although robust clinical data are lacking, IMP and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (SXT) are the most active agents and may be considered for empirical or combination therapy. Data on the efficacy of newer antibiotics against Pandoraea spp. are extremely limited and often inconsistent. This lack of strong evidence highlights a significant knowledge gap. A few antibiotic options are appropriate for treating Pandoraea spp. with IMP and SXT, which remains the treatment of choice, as well as in combination in the case of severe infections. This review focuses on a niche topic to support clinicians in selecting appropriate therapeutic decisions without precise evidence-based medicine.
{"title":"Managing Multidrug-Resistant <i>Pandoraea</i> spp.: current evidence and knowledge gaps.","authors":"Nicholas Geremia, Stefano Di Bella","doi":"10.53854/liim-3303-2","DOIUrl":"10.53854/liim-3303-2","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>Pandoraea</i> species are emerging Gram-negative non-fermenting pathogens increasingly associated with human infections, particularly in patients with cystic fibrosis, immunocompromised hosts, and critically ill individuals. These bacteria exhibit intrinsic multi-drug resistance (MDR), complicating treatment and management. A comprehensive literature search was conducted to identify relevant studies concerning <i>Pandoraea</i> infections on PubMed/MEDLINE/Google Scholar and books written by experts in microbiology and infectious diseases. <i>Pandoraea</i> isolates frequently demonstrate resistance to the most common antimicrobials, such as β-lactams, aminoglycosides, fluoroquinolones, and polymyxins. Interestingly, many strains retain susceptibility to imipenem (IMP) despite resistance to meropenem due to the production of specific oxacillinase-type β-lactamases (OXA) called OXA-1152. Although robust clinical data are lacking, IMP and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (SXT) are the most active agents and may be considered for empirical or combination therapy. Data on the efficacy of newer antibiotics against <i>Pandoraea</i> spp. are extremely limited and often inconsistent. This lack of strong evidence highlights a significant knowledge gap. A few antibiotic options are appropriate for treating <i>Pandoraea</i> spp. with IMP and SXT, which remains the treatment of choice, as well as in combination in the case of severe infections. This review focuses on a niche topic to support clinicians in selecting appropriate therapeutic decisions without precise evidence-based medicine.</p>","PeriodicalId":502111,"journal":{"name":"Le infezioni in medicina","volume":"33 3","pages":"261-267"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12419164/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145042946","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-09-01eCollection Date: 2025-01-01DOI: 10.53854/liim-3303-1
Giusy Tiseo, Stefania Stefani, Francesca Romana Fasano, Marco Falcone
Metallo-β-lactamase (MBL)-producing Enterobacterales represent a growing public health threat due to their intrinsic resistance to several antibiotics. In Italy, the burden of infections caused by these organisms has been steadily increasing. In recent years, MBL-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae, particularly those carrying New Delhi metallo-β-lactamase (NDM) enzyme, have emerged across multiple Italian regions, frequently associated with high-risk clones such as ST147. These infections are associated with high morbidity, mortality, and healthcare costs. While advances in diagnostic techniques have improved the detection of MBLs, underreporting and heterogeneous practices are common. Therapeutic options remain limited. The rising incidence and clinical complexity of MBL-producing Enterobacterales in Italy underscore the urgent need for coordinated actions to improve surveillance, diagnostics, infection control, and optimize antimicrobial stewardship. The development of novel therapeutic agents and the implementation of strategies for managing MBLs are crucial to reduce their clinical and public health impact. This review aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the current epidemiology, clinical outcomes, and management challenges of infections caused by MBL-producing Enterobacterales in Italy.
{"title":"The burden of infections caused by Metallo-Beta-Lactamase-Producing Enterobacterales in Italy: epidemiology, outcomes, and management.","authors":"Giusy Tiseo, Stefania Stefani, Francesca Romana Fasano, Marco Falcone","doi":"10.53854/liim-3303-1","DOIUrl":"10.53854/liim-3303-1","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Metallo-β-lactamase (MBL)-producing Enterobacterales represent a growing public health threat due to their intrinsic resistance to several antibiotics. In Italy, the burden of infections caused by these organisms has been steadily increasing. In recent years, MBL-producing <i>Klebsiella pneumoniae</i>, particularly those carrying New Delhi metallo-β-lactamase (NDM) enzyme, have emerged across multiple Italian regions, frequently associated with high-risk clones such as ST147. These infections are associated with high morbidity, mortality, and healthcare costs. While advances in diagnostic techniques have improved the detection of MBLs, underreporting and heterogeneous practices are common. Therapeutic options remain limited. The rising incidence and clinical complexity of MBL-producing Enterobacterales in Italy underscore the urgent need for coordinated actions to improve surveillance, diagnostics, infection control, and optimize antimicrobial stewardship. The development of novel therapeutic agents and the implementation of strategies for managing MBLs are crucial to reduce their clinical and public health impact. This review aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the current epidemiology, clinical outcomes, and management challenges of infections caused by MBL-producing Enterobacterales in Italy.</p>","PeriodicalId":502111,"journal":{"name":"Le infezioni in medicina","volume":"33 3","pages":"249-260"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12419166/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145042148","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background: Bacteremia is usually considered a marker for severe infection, yet the correlation between blood culture positivity and mortality in sepsis remains uncertain. This study aimed to evaluate whether blood culture positivity is associated with adverse clinical outcomes in patients with sepsis.
Methods: This prospective observational study included adult patients with sepsis admitted to a tertiary care hospital. Patients were classified into culture-positive and culture-negative groups based on blood culture results. Clinical outcomes including 30-day mortality, length of hospital stay, and vasopressor requirement were compared. Multivariable logistic and Cox regression models were used to assess the independent association of bacteremia with mortality, adjusting for age, and comorbidities.
Results: Of 633 patients, 41.9% (n=265) were blood culture-positive. Although culture-positive patients had higher SOFA, SAPS II scores, and procalcitonin levels, 30-day mortality was similar between groups (20.8% vs. 26.1%; p=0.12). Length of hospital stay was comparable (median 14 vs. 16 days; p=0.374), as was ICU stay duration (p=0.693). On multivariable analysis, bacteremia was not independently associated with 30-day mortality (adjusted OR 0.62, 95% CI:0.28-1.37, p=0.236). Kaplan-Meier analysis showed a non-significant trend toward higher survival in the culture-positive group (HR 1.30, 95% CI: 0.80-2.10, p=0.293).
Conclusions: Although blood culture-positive sepsis was associated with higher disease severity at presentation, it did not result in increased 30-day mortality. These findings suggest that bacteremia alone does not determine sepsis outcomes, and culture-negative sepsis should be managed with equal clinical urgency.
{"title":"Impact of blood culture positivity on clinical outcomes in sepsis: a prospective observational study.","authors":"Durga Shankar Meena, Manish Anant Talkar, Deepak Kumar, Naresh Midha, Gopal Krishana Bohra, Vibhor Tak","doi":"10.53854/liim-3303-6","DOIUrl":"10.53854/liim-3303-6","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Bacteremia is usually considered a marker for severe infection, yet the correlation between blood culture positivity and mortality in sepsis remains uncertain. This study aimed to evaluate whether blood culture positivity is associated with adverse clinical outcomes in patients with sepsis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective observational study included adult patients with sepsis admitted to a tertiary care hospital. Patients were classified into culture-positive and culture-negative groups based on blood culture results. Clinical outcomes including 30-day mortality, length of hospital stay, and vasopressor requirement were compared. Multivariable logistic and Cox regression models were used to assess the independent association of bacteremia with mortality, adjusting for age, and comorbidities.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 633 patients, 41.9% (n=265) were blood culture-positive. Although culture-positive patients had higher SOFA, SAPS II scores, and procalcitonin levels, 30-day mortality was similar between groups (20.8% vs. 26.1%; p=0.12). Length of hospital stay was comparable (median 14 vs. 16 days; p=0.374), as was ICU stay duration (p=0.693). On multivariable analysis, bacteremia was not independently associated with 30-day mortality (adjusted OR 0.62, 95% CI:0.28-1.37, p=0.236). Kaplan-Meier analysis showed a non-significant trend toward higher survival in the culture-positive group (HR 1.30, 95% CI: 0.80-2.10, p=0.293).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although blood culture-positive sepsis was associated with higher disease severity at presentation, it did not result in increased 30-day mortality. These findings suggest that bacteremia alone does not determine sepsis outcomes, and culture-negative sepsis should be managed with equal clinical urgency.</p>","PeriodicalId":502111,"journal":{"name":"Le infezioni in medicina","volume":"33 3","pages":"294-302"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12419171/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145042950","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-09-01eCollection Date: 2025-01-01DOI: 10.53854/liim-3303-8
Manuela Avolio, Ingrid Reffo, Silvia Rigo, Giovanni Del Fabro, Elena Garlatti Costa, Gloria Marson, Silvia Grazioli, Fabiana Nascimben, Domenico Arcidiacono, Laura De Santi, Luca Bianco, Tommaso Pellis, Gabriella Nadalin, Massimo Crapis, Giancarlo Basaglia, Sergio Venturini
Background: The COVID-19 pandemic deeply impacted the epidemiology of respiratory viruses and bacteria, including Mycoplasma pneumoniae (MP), Chlamydophila pneumoniae (CP), and Bordetella pertussis (BP). We have retrospectively examined the circulation patterns of major non-culturable respiratory pathogens that cause acute respiratory infections (ARIs) over four years (2021-2024), encompassing both the pandemic and post-pandemic phases.
Methods: The study was conducted in the five hospitals of the Friuli Venezia Giulia region, in northeastern Italy from January 2021 to December 2024. A total of 11,208 respiratory samples from adult and pediatric patients displaying symptoms of ARIs, but negative for SARS-CoV-2, in accordance with our testing protocols, were tested for the following pathogens: influenza A and B (FLU A-B), adenovirus (ADV), coronaviruses (COV) 229E, NL63, OC43, bocavirus (BOV), enterovirus (EV), metapneumovirus (MPV), rhinovirus (RV), parainfluenza types 1-4 (PIV 1-4), respiratory syncytial virus A and B (RSV A/B), MP, CP, BP, and B. parapertussis (BPP).
Results: The number of tests increased from 1,076 in 2021 to 4,377 in 2024. Overall positivity rates rose as follows: 27.4% (295/1,076) in 2021, 33.6% (714/2,125) in 2022, 41.3% (1,500/3,631) in 2023, and 47.2% (2,067/4,377) in 2024. RV, ADV, BOV, COV, PIV 1-4, MPV, and RSV A/B gradually returned to pre-pandemic circulation levels. FLU A-B, not detected in 2021, re-emerged in 2022. MP, BP, and CP, nearly absent in 2021 and 2022, reappeared in 2023.
Conclusion: This retrospective study assessed the circulation of respiratory viruses, MP, CP and BP in our geographical area, observing their gradual and asynchronous re-emergence following the COVID-19 pandemic. Strengthening advanced molecular microbiological diagnostics within clinical and epidemiological settings is crucial for supporting new surveillance models and promoting the judicious use of antibiotics.
{"title":"Back to normality? Respiratory viruses, Mycoplasma pneumoniae, Chlamydophila pneumoniae, and Bordetella pertussis trends: local epidemiological update after the COVID-19 storm.","authors":"Manuela Avolio, Ingrid Reffo, Silvia Rigo, Giovanni Del Fabro, Elena Garlatti Costa, Gloria Marson, Silvia Grazioli, Fabiana Nascimben, Domenico Arcidiacono, Laura De Santi, Luca Bianco, Tommaso Pellis, Gabriella Nadalin, Massimo Crapis, Giancarlo Basaglia, Sergio Venturini","doi":"10.53854/liim-3303-8","DOIUrl":"10.53854/liim-3303-8","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The COVID-19 pandemic deeply impacted the epidemiology of respiratory viruses and bacteria, including <i>Mycoplasma pneumoniae</i> (MP), <i>Chlamydophila pneumoniae (CP)</i>, and <i>Bordetella pertussis</i> (BP). We have retrospectively examined the circulation patterns of major non-culturable respiratory pathogens that cause acute respiratory infections (ARIs) over four years (2021-2024), encompassing both the pandemic and post-pandemic phases.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study was conducted in the five hospitals of the Friuli Venezia Giulia region, in northeastern Italy from January 2021 to December 2024. A total of 11,208 respiratory samples from adult and pediatric patients displaying symptoms of ARIs, but negative for SARS-CoV-2, in accordance with our testing protocols, were tested for the following pathogens: influenza A and B (FLU A-B), adenovirus (ADV), coronaviruses (COV) 229E, NL63, OC43, bocavirus (BOV), enterovirus (EV), metapneumovirus (MPV), rhinovirus (RV), parainfluenza types 1-4 (PIV 1-4), respiratory syncytial virus A and B (RSV A/B), MP, CP, BP, and <i>B. parapertussis</i> (BPP).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The number of tests increased from 1,076 in 2021 to 4,377 in 2024. Overall positivity rates rose as follows: 27.4% (295/1,076) in 2021, 33.6% (714/2,125) in 2022, 41.3% (1,500/3,631) in 2023, and 47.2% (2,067/4,377) in 2024. RV, ADV, BOV, COV, PIV 1-4, MPV, and RSV A/B gradually returned to pre-pandemic circulation levels. FLU A-B, not detected in 2021, re-emerged in 2022. MP, BP, and CP, nearly absent in 2021 and 2022, reappeared in 2023.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This retrospective study assessed the circulation of respiratory viruses, MP, CP and BP in our geographical area, observing their gradual and asynchronous re-emergence following the COVID-19 pandemic. Strengthening advanced molecular microbiological diagnostics within clinical and epidemiological settings is crucial for supporting new surveillance models and promoting the judicious use of antibiotics.</p>","PeriodicalId":502111,"journal":{"name":"Le infezioni in medicina","volume":"33 3","pages":"311-320"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12419167/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145042961","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}