首页 > 最新文献

Filosofija. Sociologija最新文献

英文 中文
A Theory of Justice and Social Mechanics 正义与社会机制理论
Pub Date : 2024-06-11 DOI: 10.6001/fil-soc.2024.35.2priedas.special-issue.7
Laurynas Didžiulis
In this article, I argue that Aristotle, a universal philosopher who analysed both natural and social worlds, suggested a groundwork for a theory of justice, which is a fertile soil for a broader social perspective. Such categories as the social order, free will, law, policy choices, and the state are naturally flowing from his brief passage on justice in his Nichomachean Ethics. I assert that all of them are phenomena of turbulent social mechanics. Therefore, in this paper I introduce Aristotle’s contribution to the mainstream theory of justice and then, loosely relying on the works of Aristotle and Newton, I develop a theory of justice in the context of social mechanics. I conclude that the concept of justice is essentially the same as Newton’s third law of mechanics. For this purpose, I employ interdisciplinary and functional approaches, textual and conceptual analysis,and the method of deduction.
在这篇文章中,我认为亚里士多德是一位同时分析自然世界和社会世界的普世哲学家,他提出了正义理论的基础,而正义理论是更广阔的社会视角的肥沃土壤。社会秩序、自由意志、法律、政策选择和国家等范畴自然而然地从亚里士多德在《尼各马科伦理学》中关于正义的简短论述中流淌出来。我断言,所有这些都是动荡的社会力学现象。因此,在本文中,我介绍了亚里士多德对主流正义理论的贡献,然后,我松散地依托亚里士多德和牛顿的著作,发展了社会力学背景下的正义理论。我的结论是,正义的概念本质上与牛顿的力学第三定律相同。为此,我采用了跨学科和功能性方法、文本和概念分析以及演绎法。
{"title":"A Theory of Justice and Social Mechanics","authors":"Laurynas Didžiulis","doi":"10.6001/fil-soc.2024.35.2priedas.special-issue.7","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.6001/fil-soc.2024.35.2priedas.special-issue.7","url":null,"abstract":"In this article, I argue that Aristotle, a universal philosopher who analysed both natural and social worlds, suggested a groundwork for a theory of justice, which is a fertile soil for a broader social perspective. Such categories as the social order, free will, law, policy choices, and the state are naturally flowing from his brief passage on justice in his Nichomachean Ethics. I assert that all of them are phenomena of turbulent social mechanics. Therefore, in this paper I introduce Aristotle’s contribution to the mainstream theory of justice and then, loosely relying on the works of Aristotle and Newton, I develop a theory of justice in the context of social mechanics. I conclude that the concept of justice is essentially the same as Newton’s third law of mechanics. For this purpose, I employ interdisciplinary and functional approaches, textual and conceptual analysis,and the method of deduction.","PeriodicalId":502666,"journal":{"name":"Filosofija. Sociologija","volume":"72 11","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141357922","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Stambulo konvencijos konstitucingumo klausimas Lietuvoje 伊斯坦布尔公约》在立陶宛的合宪性
Pub Date : 2024-06-11 DOI: 10.6001/fil-soc.2024.35.2priedas.special-issue.2
Dovilė Pūraitė-Andrikienė
Lietuva 2013 m. pasirašė Europos Tarybos konvenciją dėl smurto prieš moteris ir smurto artimoje aplinkoje prevencijos ir kovos su juo (toliau – Stambulo konvencija arba Konvencija), tačiau iki šiol vis dar nėra jos ratifikavusi. 2024 m. kovo 14 d. Lietuvos Respublikos Konstitucinis Teismas priėmė išvadą dėl kai kurių Stambulo konvencijos nuostatų atitikties Lietuvos Respublikos Konstitucijai. Straipsnyje Stambulo konvencijos atitikties Konstitucijai klausimas yra nagrinėjamas platesniame Rytų ir Vidurio Europos valstybių kultūrinių, politinių, teisinių nesutarimų kontekste. Aptariamos šią Konvenciją supančios abejonės Rytų ir Vidurio Europos valstybėse, šių valstybių konstitucinių teismų sprendimai dėl Stambulo konvencijos nuostatų konstitucingumo, taip pat analizuojamos Lietuvos abejonės dėl šios Konvencijos atitikties Konstitucijai ir Konstitucinio Teismo požiūris į jas.
立陶宛于 2013 年签署了《欧洲委员会预防和打击暴力侵害妇女行为及家庭暴力公约》(《伊斯坦布尔公约》或《公约》),但尚未批准该公约。2024 年 3 月 14 日2014 年 3 月 20 日,立陶宛共和国宪法法院通过了一项关于《伊斯坦布尔公约》某些条款是否符合立陶宛共和国宪法的结论。本文在东欧和中欧国家之间文化、政治和法律分歧的大背景下探讨了《伊斯坦布尔公约》的合宪性。文章讨论了东欧和中欧国家对《公约》的疑虑、这些国家的宪法法院对《伊斯坦布尔公约》条款合宪性的裁决、立陶宛对《公约》合宪性的疑虑以及宪法法院对这些疑虑的处理方式。
{"title":"Stambulo konvencijos konstitucingumo klausimas Lietuvoje","authors":"Dovilė Pūraitė-Andrikienė","doi":"10.6001/fil-soc.2024.35.2priedas.special-issue.2","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.6001/fil-soc.2024.35.2priedas.special-issue.2","url":null,"abstract":"Lietuva 2013 m. pasirašė Europos Tarybos konvenciją dėl smurto prieš moteris ir smurto artimoje aplinkoje prevencijos ir kovos su juo (toliau – Stambulo konvencija arba Konvencija), tačiau iki šiol vis dar nėra jos ratifikavusi. 2024 m. kovo 14 d. Lietuvos Respublikos Konstitucinis Teismas priėmė išvadą dėl kai kurių Stambulo konvencijos nuostatų atitikties Lietuvos Respublikos Konstitucijai. Straipsnyje Stambulo konvencijos atitikties Konstitucijai klausimas yra nagrinėjamas platesniame Rytų ir Vidurio Europos valstybių kultūrinių, politinių, teisinių nesutarimų kontekste. Aptariamos šią Konvenciją supančios abejonės Rytų ir Vidurio Europos valstybėse, šių valstybių konstitucinių teismų sprendimai dėl Stambulo konvencijos nuostatų konstitucingumo, taip pat analizuojamos Lietuvos abejonės dėl šios Konvencijos atitikties Konstitucijai ir Konstitucinio Teismo požiūris į jas.","PeriodicalId":502666,"journal":{"name":"Filosofija. Sociologija","volume":"11 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141356018","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Can Artificial Intelligence Engage in the Practice of Law as the Art of Good and Justice? 人工智能能否参与作为善与正义艺术的法律实践?
Pub Date : 2024-06-11 DOI: 10.6001/fil-soc.2024.35.2priedas.special-issue.6
Neringa Gaubienė
This article explores whether artificial intelligence (AI) can engage in the practice of law as an art of good and justice. It examines the historical and philosophical foundations of law as the art of promoting societal harmony and resolving moral dilemmas. The research employs critical and philosophical analysis methods integrating insights from legal scholars, ethicists, technologists, and policymakers. The study identifies AI’s potential to streamline legal processes, enhance access to justice, and reduce bias in decision-making. However, it also highlights ethical challenges such as transparency, accountability, and the impact on the legal workforce. The article emphasises the importance of striking a balance between technological innovation and human values, advocating for proactive regulation and interdisciplinary cooperation to ensure the ethical development and implementation of AI in law. The results of the study highlight the transformative potential of AI in revolutionising legal practice, emphasising its capacity to streamline processes, improve access to justice, and mitigate bias. However, ethical considerations such as transparency, accountability, and the preservation of human judgment are crucial to ensuring that AI integration in law upholds fundamental principles of justice and fairness.
本文探讨了人工智能(AI)能否将法律作为一门善与正义的艺术来实践。文章探讨了法律作为促进社会和谐和解决道德困境的艺术的历史和哲学基础。研究采用批判和哲学分析方法,整合了法律学者、伦理学家、技术专家和政策制定者的见解。研究指出了人工智能在简化法律程序、提高司法救助和减少决策偏见方面的潜力。不过,它也强调了道德方面的挑战,如透明度、问责制以及对法律工作者队伍的影响。文章强调了在技术创新和人类价值观之间取得平衡的重要性,倡导积极监管和跨学科合作,以确保人工智能在法律领域的道德发展和实施。研究结果凸显了人工智能在革新法律实践方面的变革潜力,强调了其简化流程、改善司法救助和减少偏见的能力。然而,诸如透明度、问责制和维护人类判断力等伦理方面的考虑因素,对于确保将人工智能融入法律维护公正和公平的基本原则至关重要。
{"title":"Can Artificial Intelligence Engage in the Practice of Law as the Art of Good and Justice?","authors":"Neringa Gaubienė","doi":"10.6001/fil-soc.2024.35.2priedas.special-issue.6","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.6001/fil-soc.2024.35.2priedas.special-issue.6","url":null,"abstract":"This article explores whether artificial intelligence (AI) can engage in the practice of law as an art of good and justice. It examines the historical and philosophical foundations of law as the art of promoting societal harmony and resolving moral dilemmas. The research employs critical and philosophical analysis methods integrating insights from legal scholars, ethicists, technologists, and policymakers. The study identifies AI’s potential to streamline legal processes, enhance access to justice, and reduce bias in decision-making. However, it also highlights ethical challenges such as transparency, accountability, and the impact on the legal workforce. The article emphasises the importance of striking a balance between technological innovation and human values, advocating for proactive regulation and interdisciplinary cooperation to ensure the ethical development and implementation of AI in law. The results of the study highlight the transformative potential of AI in revolutionising legal practice, emphasising its capacity to streamline processes, improve access to justice, and mitigate bias. However, ethical considerations such as transparency, accountability, and the preservation of human judgment are crucial to ensuring that AI integration in law upholds fundamental principles of justice and fairness.","PeriodicalId":502666,"journal":{"name":"Filosofija. Sociologija","volume":"6 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141356463","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Violence of Adult Sons Against Mothers in the Context of Matricide 弑母事件中成年儿子对母亲的暴力行为
Pub Date : 2024-06-11 DOI: 10.6001/fil-soc.2024.35.2priedas.special-issue.3
Ilona Michailovič, Lina Šumskaitė
This article endeavours to analyse an important and concerning phenomenon: women killed by their adult sons. It focuses on parricide (killing of parents or close relatives), with special attention on killing of mothers (matricide), while the term ‘homicide’ is used as an overarching term for killing human beings. The article gives an overview of statistics on reported cases of matricide over a five-year period. Employing qualitative analysis, it refers to four court judgments in instances of matricide committed by adult offspring in Lithuania between 2021 and 2023. Based on the analysis of recent international studies, crime statistics and court decisions, the aim of this study is to highlight deeper social problems, which predispose mothers to susceptibility to matricide. Therefore, the article contributes new knowledge to the discourse within the field of gender-based violence against women. Moreover, this study provides professionals in the field of domestic abuse with enriched comprehension of the matricide phenomenon and enhances institutional cooperation seeking prevention of violent behaviour and adequate protection of victims.
本文试图分析一个重要且令人担忧的现象:成年儿子杀害妇女。文章侧重于弑父(杀害父母或近亲),特别关注杀害母亲(弑母),而 "杀人 "一词则被用作杀害人类的总称。文章概述了五年内报告的弑母案件的统计数据。通过定性分析,文章引用了 2021 年至 2023 年立陶宛法院对成年后代弑母案件的四项判决。基于对近期国际研究、犯罪统计数据和法院判决的分析,本研究旨在强调更深层次的社会问题,这些问题导致母亲容易弑母。因此,本文为基于性别的暴力侵害妇女行为领域的讨论贡献了新的知识。此外,本研究还为家庭虐待领域的专业人员提供了对弑母现象的丰富理解,并加强了机构合作,以寻求预防暴力行为和充分保护受害者。
{"title":"Violence of Adult Sons Against Mothers in the Context of Matricide","authors":"Ilona Michailovič, Lina Šumskaitė","doi":"10.6001/fil-soc.2024.35.2priedas.special-issue.3","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.6001/fil-soc.2024.35.2priedas.special-issue.3","url":null,"abstract":"This article endeavours to analyse an important and concerning phenomenon: women killed by their adult sons. It focuses on parricide (killing of parents or close relatives), with special attention on killing of mothers (matricide), while the term ‘homicide’ is used as an overarching term for killing human beings. The article gives an overview of statistics on reported cases of matricide over a five-year period. Employing qualitative analysis, it refers to four court judgments in instances of matricide committed by adult offspring in Lithuania between 2021 and 2023. Based on the analysis of recent international studies, crime statistics and court decisions, the aim of this study is to highlight deeper social problems, which predispose mothers to susceptibility to matricide. Therefore, the article contributes new knowledge to the discourse within the field of gender-based violence against women. Moreover, this study provides professionals in the field of domestic abuse with enriched comprehension of the matricide phenomenon and enhances institutional cooperation seeking prevention of violent behaviour and adequate protection of victims.","PeriodicalId":502666,"journal":{"name":"Filosofija. Sociologija","volume":"93 21","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141359292","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The Uncertainty of Aviation Safety and Aviation Security in Relation to Human Rights: Philosophical Aspects of Legal Definitions 航空安全和航空保安与人权的不确定性:法律定义的哲学方面
Pub Date : 2024-06-11 DOI: 10.6001/fil-soc.2024.35.2priedas.special-issue.8
Saulius Stonkus
The article discusses the uncertainty of legal definitions of aviation safety and and aviation security, the implementation of which often result in certain restrictions of human rights. In the article, a hypothesis is made that, despite usually treated as well-known concepts, safety and security are not so clear and well-defined, often leaving the reader to guess at their precise meaning. The aim of this article is to identify the core features that characterise aviation safety and aviation security and could disclose their legal content when assessing their comparative weight in relation to the protection of human rights. Supported by holistic approach from different perspectives (socio-cultural, historical, etc.), the phenomenological and hermeneutic analysis allowed providing an in-depth understanding of various meanings of safety and security concepts. An overview of the existing linguistic peculiarities of the use of the terms ‘safety’ and ‘security’ with an emphasis on the importance of determining the context in which they are used as primary evidence of their meaning is followed by the analysis of the common features and differences between the concepts of safety and security that supplements the discourse on the dilemma of combining subjective and objective, relative and absolute perceptions of safety and security. The research from the view point of normative jurisprudence reveals the polysemy inherent in aviation safety and aviation security, especially in terms of the values they represent, suggesting the conclusion that legal definitions of ‘aviation safety’ and ‘aviation security’ should in part be treated as a sort of ad hoc definitions, which have to be developed (clarified) in each particular case.
文章讨论了航空安全和航空安保法律定义的不确定性,这些定义的执行往往会导致对人权的某些限制。文章提出了一个假设,即尽管安全和安保通常被视为众所周知的概念,但它们的定义并不那么清晰明确,读者往往需要猜测其确切含义。本文旨在确定航空安全和航空安保的核心特征,并在评估它们在人权保护方面的比较权重时披露其法律内容。在不同视角(社会文化、历史等)的整体方法支持下,现象学和诠释学分析有助于深入理解安全和安保概念的各种含义。在概述了 "安全 "和 "安保 "这两个术语的现有语言特点之后,分析了安全和安保这两个概念的共同点和不同点,重点强调了确定这两个术语的使用环境作为其含义的主要证据的重要性,从而补充了关于主观和客观、相对和绝对安全和安保观念相结合的两难问题的论述。从规范法学的角度进行的研究揭示了航空安全和航空安保所固有的多义性,特别是在它们所代表的价值方面,从而得出结论认为,"航空安全 "和 "航空安保 "的法律定义在某种程度上应被视为一种临时定义,必须在每种特定情况下加以发展(澄清)。
{"title":"The Uncertainty of Aviation Safety and Aviation Security in Relation to Human Rights: Philosophical Aspects of Legal Definitions","authors":"Saulius Stonkus","doi":"10.6001/fil-soc.2024.35.2priedas.special-issue.8","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.6001/fil-soc.2024.35.2priedas.special-issue.8","url":null,"abstract":"The article discusses the uncertainty of legal definitions of aviation safety and and aviation security, the implementation of which often result in certain restrictions of human rights. In the article, a hypothesis is made that, despite usually treated as well-known concepts, safety and security are not so clear and well-defined, often leaving the reader to guess at their precise meaning. The aim of this article is to identify the core features that characterise aviation safety and aviation security and could disclose their legal content when assessing their comparative weight in relation to the protection of human rights. Supported by holistic approach from different perspectives (socio-cultural, historical, etc.), the phenomenological and hermeneutic analysis allowed providing an in-depth understanding of various meanings of safety and security concepts. An overview of the existing linguistic peculiarities of the use of the terms ‘safety’ and ‘security’ with an emphasis on the importance of determining the context in which they are used as primary evidence of their meaning is followed by the analysis of the common features and differences between the concepts of safety and security that supplements the discourse on the dilemma of combining subjective and objective, relative and absolute perceptions of safety and security. The research from the view point of normative jurisprudence reveals the polysemy inherent in aviation safety and aviation security, especially in terms of the values they represent, suggesting the conclusion that legal definitions of ‘aviation safety’ and ‘aviation security’ should in part be treated as a sort of ad hoc definitions, which have to be developed (clarified) in each particular case.","PeriodicalId":502666,"journal":{"name":"Filosofija. Sociologija","volume":"31 16","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141355484","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Konstitucija: tekstas ir kontekstas 宪法:文本和背景
Pub Date : 2024-06-11 DOI: 10.6001/fil-soc.2024.35.2priedas.special-issue.1
Giedrė Lastauskienė, Johanas Baltrimas
Būtų netikslu Konstitucijos taikymą apibūdinti vien kaip elementarų loginį silogizmą, jos teksto prasmės interpretavimas moksle yra aiškinamas įvairiais kompleksiniais modeliais. Vienas iš veiksnių, kuris į tuos modelius Lietuvos moksle nėra adekvačiai inkorporuotas, yra kontekstas. Šiame straipsnyje pristatomas konteksto vaidmuo Konstitucinio Teismo jurisprudencijoje aiškinant Konstitucijos tekstą. Tyrimo rezultatai rodo, kad šis vaidmuo nėra mažareikšmis ir net gali lemti tokį Konstitucijos išaiškinimą, kuris prasilenkia su tuo, kurį gautume pažodžiui vadovaudamiesi Konstitucijos tekstu. Tikimasi, kad šio fenomeno pažinimas padės tiksliau suprasti ir išartikuliuoti Konstitucinio Teismo sprendimų priėmimo metodologiją bei patikimiau prognozuoti galimų konstitucinių ginčų baigtį.
将《宪法》的适用描述为一个单纯的逻辑论证是不准确的;对《宪法》文本含义的解释在科学中已经有了各种复杂的模式。在立陶宛科学界,这些模型中没有充分纳入的因素之一是语境。本文介绍了语境在宪法法院解释宪法文本的判例中的作用。研究结果表明,这种作用并非微不足道,甚至可能导致对宪法的解释与按照宪法文本字面意思所得出的解释相左。希望对这一现象的了解将有助于更准确地理解和阐述宪法法院的决策方法,并更可靠地预测潜在宪法争端的结果。
{"title":"Konstitucija: tekstas ir kontekstas","authors":"Giedrė Lastauskienė, Johanas Baltrimas","doi":"10.6001/fil-soc.2024.35.2priedas.special-issue.1","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.6001/fil-soc.2024.35.2priedas.special-issue.1","url":null,"abstract":"Būtų netikslu Konstitucijos taikymą apibūdinti vien kaip elementarų loginį silogizmą, jos teksto prasmės interpretavimas moksle yra aiškinamas įvairiais kompleksiniais modeliais. Vienas iš veiksnių, kuris į tuos modelius Lietuvos moksle nėra adekvačiai inkorporuotas, yra kontekstas. Šiame straipsnyje pristatomas konteksto vaidmuo Konstitucinio Teismo jurisprudencijoje aiškinant Konstitucijos tekstą. Tyrimo rezultatai rodo, kad šis vaidmuo nėra mažareikšmis ir net gali lemti tokį Konstitucijos išaiškinimą, kuris prasilenkia su tuo, kurį gautume pažodžiui vadovaudamiesi Konstitucijos tekstu. Tikimasi, kad šio fenomeno pažinimas padės tiksliau suprasti ir išartikuliuoti Konstitucinio Teismo sprendimų priėmimo metodologiją bei patikimiau prognozuoti galimų konstitucinių ginčų baigtį.","PeriodicalId":502666,"journal":{"name":"Filosofija. Sociologija","volume":"28 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141360095","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The Moral Compass of Law: Ensuring Ethical Standards Through Legal Education? 法律的道德指南针:通过法律教育确保道德标准?
Pub Date : 2024-06-11 DOI: 10.6001/fil-soc.2024.35.2priedas.special-issue.5
D. Valančienė, Jevgenij Machovenko
The aim of the article is to answer the question of the importance of legal education in ensuring legal ethics and the moral compass of a person by understanding the most important aspects of it. Methods applied include theoretical-scientific analysis, systematic and critical review of scientific literature and other relevant sources, normative and critical analysis of ethical principles in the context of legal education, empirical-quantitative and qualitative analysis of scholarly articles. According to the main thesis of this article, the integration of ethics into legal education can enhance moral development of future lawyers and improve their ability to serve justice. This paper traces the historical neglect of ethics in legal education and argues for its central place in modern studies. For lawyers to serve justice, a well-defined moral compass is essential. Several conclusions are drawn in this article, and first of all it is believed that universities will have to realise that a good lawyer is not only a professionally competent lawyer, because that is not enough in today’s world. Even if it is a personal journey, universities cannot stand aside, the future lawyer must be helped to grow. What is much more important is not so much the codes of ethics but how our moral compass works and what path it can point us down. To avoid getting lost, law schools could teach future lawyers how to empower their moral compass and find their way around. Each law teacher should have to find ways to teach the key virtues of a lawyer’s moral compass (e.g., wisdom, fortitude, temperance, and justice), how to help law students grow and not burn out in difficult situations. As our empirical research shows, the best scholarly articles on legal education discuss the elements of legal ethics. It is recognised that the ethics of lawyers is increasingly becoming an issue that goes beyond the professional aspects, and it is the university that must contribute to the development of the moral compass.
本文旨在通过了解法律教育最重要的方面,回答法律教育在确保法律伦理和个人道德指南针方面的重要性这一问题。所采用的方法包括理论-科学分析、对科学文献和其他相关资料进行系统和批判性审查、对法律教育背景下的伦理原则进行规范和批判性分析、对学术文章进行实证-定量和定性分析。根据本文的主要论点,将伦理融入法学教育可以促进未来律师的道德发展,提高他们服务于司法的能力。本文追溯了伦理学在法律教育中被忽视的历史,并论证了伦理学在现代研究中的核心地位。律师要服务于正义,明确的道德指南针是必不可少的。本文得出了几个结论,首先认为大学必须认识到,一名优秀的律师不仅仅是一名在专业上称职的律师,因为在当今世界,这还远远不够。即使是个人的成长历程,大学也不能袖手旁观,必须帮助未来的律师成长。更重要的不是道德准则,而是我们的道德指南针如何运作,它能为我们指明方向。为了避免迷失方向,法学院可以教导未来的律师如何增强道德指南针的力量,找到自己的方向。每位法学教师都应该想方设法传授律师道德指南针的关键美德(如智慧、坚韧、节制和正义),如何帮助法学专业学生成长,不在困境中焦头烂额。我们的实证研究表明,关于法律教育的最佳学术文章都讨论了法律伦理的要素。人们认识到,律师的职业道德日益成为一个超越专业范畴的问题,而大学必须为道德指南针的发展做出贡献。
{"title":"The Moral Compass of Law: Ensuring Ethical Standards Through Legal Education?","authors":"D. Valančienė, Jevgenij Machovenko","doi":"10.6001/fil-soc.2024.35.2priedas.special-issue.5","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.6001/fil-soc.2024.35.2priedas.special-issue.5","url":null,"abstract":"The aim of the article is to answer the question of the importance of legal education in ensuring legal ethics and the moral compass of a person by understanding the most important aspects of it. Methods applied include theoretical-scientific analysis, systematic and critical review of scientific literature and other relevant sources, normative and critical analysis of ethical principles in the context of legal education, empirical-quantitative and qualitative analysis of scholarly articles. According to the main thesis of this article, the integration of ethics into legal education can enhance moral development of future lawyers and improve their ability to serve justice. This paper traces the historical neglect of ethics in legal education and argues for its central place in modern studies. For lawyers to serve justice, a well-defined moral compass is essential. Several conclusions are drawn in this article, and first of all it is believed that universities will have to realise that a good lawyer is not only a professionally competent lawyer, because that is not enough in today’s world. Even if it is a personal journey, universities cannot stand aside, the future lawyer must be helped to grow. What is much more important is not so much the codes of ethics but how our moral compass works and what path it can point us down. To avoid getting lost, law schools could teach future lawyers how to empower their moral compass and find their way around. Each law teacher should have to find ways to teach the key virtues of a lawyer’s moral compass (e.g., wisdom, fortitude, temperance, and justice), how to help law students grow and not burn out in difficult situations. As our empirical research shows, the best scholarly articles on legal education discuss the elements of legal ethics. It is recognised that the ethics of lawyers is increasingly becoming an issue that goes beyond the professional aspects, and it is the university that must contribute to the development of the moral compass.","PeriodicalId":502666,"journal":{"name":"Filosofija. Sociologija","volume":"97 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141359437","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Changes in Judicial Behaviour after the Reform of the Lithuanian Civil Procedure 立陶宛民事诉讼程序改革后司法行为的变化
Pub Date : 2024-06-11 DOI: 10.6001/fil-soc.2024.35.2priedas.special-issue.4
V. Nekrošius, Jurgis Bartkus
The article aims to assess whether the procedural innovations introduced by the reform of the civil procedure law of the Republic of Lithuania have brought changes in judges’ behaviour, which the reform intended to achieve. The study analyses the driving reason behind the reform of the civil procedure law, its objectives, and the ways the five innovations brought about by the reform changed the behaviour of the judges. The analysis of the legal sources and the empirical study show that some of the innovations introduced by the Civil Procedure Code have not yet been properly assimilated and that the code, which has been in force for twenty years, is still not fully operational and understood.
文章旨在评估立陶宛共和国民事诉讼法改革所引入的程序创新是否给法官的行为带来了改革所要实现的变化。研究分析了民事诉讼法改革背后的驱动原因、改革目标以及改革带来的五项创新如何改变了法官的行为。对法律渊源的分析和实证研究表明,《民事诉讼法》所引入的一些创新尚未得到适当吸收,而且这部已生效二十年的法典仍未得到充分实施和理解。
{"title":"Changes in Judicial Behaviour after the Reform of the Lithuanian Civil Procedure","authors":"V. Nekrošius, Jurgis Bartkus","doi":"10.6001/fil-soc.2024.35.2priedas.special-issue.4","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.6001/fil-soc.2024.35.2priedas.special-issue.4","url":null,"abstract":"The article aims to assess whether the procedural innovations introduced by the reform of the civil procedure law of the Republic of Lithuania have brought changes in judges’ behaviour, which the reform intended to achieve. The study analyses the driving reason behind the reform of the civil procedure law, its objectives, and the ways the five innovations brought about by the reform changed the behaviour of the judges. The analysis of the legal sources and the empirical study show that some of the innovations introduced by the Civil Procedure Code have not yet been properly assimilated and that the code, which has been in force for twenty years, is still not fully operational and understood.","PeriodicalId":502666,"journal":{"name":"Filosofija. Sociologija","volume":"124 42","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141360592","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Kavoliška laisvės sociologija ir jos dėmenys 轻率的自由社会学及其方方面面
Pub Date : 2024-06-05 DOI: 10.6001/fil-soc.2024.35.2.2
Dainius Genys
Žymus Lietuvos sociologas Vytautas Kavolis visą akademinę karjerą plačiai tyrinėjo laisvės klausimą, nors ir nenaudojo „laisvės sociologijos“ pavadinimo. Jo daugiamatė analizė apėmė politines institucijas, kultūros normas, istorinę evoliuciją ir globalias perspektyvas, atskleisdama sudėtingą visuomenės struktūrų ir asmens laisvių sąveiką. Šiame straipsnyje politinės sociologijos požiūriu, išskaidant laisvės ir jos apraiškų įvairiuose visuomenės kontekstuose supratimą, bandoma kristalizuoti V. Kavolio sociologinius rėmus. V. Kavolio tarpdisciplininis požiūris, metodologinis originalumas ir reflektyvi analizė prisidėjo prie gilaus visuomenės laisvėjimo dinamikos ir galios santykių tyrinėjimo, metė iššūkį nusistovėjusioms paradigmoms ir pasisakė už įtraukesnę ir teisingesnę visuomenę. Jo įžvalgos tebėra aktualios šiandienei Lietuvai, išgyvenančiai postsovietinį virsmą ir susiduriančiai su globaliais iššūkiais.
立陶宛著名社会学家维陶塔斯-卡沃利斯(Vytautas Kavolis)的整个学术生涯都在广泛研究自由问题,尽管他没有使用过 "自由社会学 "这一术语。他的多维分析涵盖了政治体制、文化规范、历史演变和全球视角,揭示了社会结构与个人自由之间复杂的相互作用。本文试图从政治社会学的角度,通过剖析对自由的理解及其在不同社会背景下的表现形式,将卡沃尔的社会学框架具体化。卡沃尔的跨学科方法、方法论上的独创性和反思性分析有助于深入探索社会解放和权力关系的动态,挑战既有范式,倡导建立一个更具包容性和更加公平的社会。他的见解对今天的立陶宛仍然具有现实意义,因为立陶宛正在经历后苏联时代的转型,并面临着全球性的挑战。
{"title":"Kavoliška laisvės sociologija ir jos dėmenys","authors":"Dainius Genys","doi":"10.6001/fil-soc.2024.35.2.2","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.6001/fil-soc.2024.35.2.2","url":null,"abstract":"Žymus Lietuvos sociologas Vytautas Kavolis visą akademinę karjerą plačiai tyrinėjo laisvės klausimą, nors ir nenaudojo „laisvės sociologijos“ pavadinimo. Jo daugiamatė analizė apėmė politines institucijas, kultūros normas, istorinę evoliuciją ir globalias perspektyvas, atskleisdama sudėtingą visuomenės struktūrų ir asmens laisvių sąveiką. Šiame straipsnyje politinės sociologijos požiūriu, išskaidant laisvės ir jos apraiškų įvairiuose visuomenės kontekstuose supratimą, bandoma kristalizuoti V. Kavolio sociologinius rėmus. V. Kavolio tarpdisciplininis požiūris, metodologinis originalumas ir reflektyvi analizė prisidėjo prie gilaus visuomenės laisvėjimo dinamikos ir galios santykių tyrinėjimo, metė iššūkį nusistovėjusioms paradigmoms ir pasisakė už įtraukesnę ir teisingesnę visuomenę. Jo įžvalgos tebėra aktualios šiandienei Lietuvai, išgyvenančiai postsovietinį virsmą ir susiduriančiai su globaliais iššūkiais.","PeriodicalId":502666,"journal":{"name":"Filosofija. Sociologija","volume":"48 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141384675","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Changing Gendered Attitudes Toward Childcare: Social-Economic Determinants of Understanding Family Roles Among Lithuanian Parents 改变性别对育儿的态度:立陶宛父母理解家庭角色的社会经济决定因素
Pub Date : 2024-06-05 DOI: 10.6001/fil-soc.2024.35.2.5
Jurga Bučaitė-Vilkė
The parental choices need more explanation on how the perceptions of family gender roles could explain the differences in parental satisfaction with childcare and domestic division and what social-economic factors determine their normative attitudes. In other words, the paper analyses how families’ attitudes to childcare division are related to their socioeconomic backgrounds and normative preferences on gender roles. The paper uses the representative population survey data of Lithuania’s working-age generation cohort (34–48 years old). The main results reveal that parental preferences for childcare allocation are mostly shaped by their economic status and traditional gender roles in contrast to the country’s widely accessible active labour market and family welfare system.
父母的选择需要更多的解释,即对家庭性别角色的看法如何解释父母对育儿和家务分工满意度的差异,以及哪些社会经济因素决定了他们的规范态度。换句话说,本文分析了家庭对育儿分工的态度与其社会经济背景和对性别角色的规范偏好之间的关系。本文使用了立陶宛工作年龄段人群(34-48 岁)的代表性人口调查数据。主要结果显示,父母对儿童保育分配的偏好主要受其经济地位和传统性别角色的影响,这与立陶宛广泛活跃的劳动力市场和家庭福利制度形成了鲜明对比。
{"title":"Changing Gendered Attitudes Toward Childcare: Social-Economic Determinants of Understanding Family Roles Among Lithuanian Parents","authors":"Jurga Bučaitė-Vilkė","doi":"10.6001/fil-soc.2024.35.2.5","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.6001/fil-soc.2024.35.2.5","url":null,"abstract":"The parental choices need more explanation on how the perceptions of family gender roles could explain the differences in parental satisfaction with childcare and domestic division and what social-economic factors determine their normative attitudes. In other words, the paper analyses how families’ attitudes to childcare division are related to their socioeconomic backgrounds and normative preferences on gender roles. The paper uses the representative population survey data of Lithuania’s working-age generation cohort (34–48 years old). The main results reveal that parental preferences for childcare allocation are mostly shaped by their economic status and traditional gender roles in contrast to the country’s widely accessible active labour market and family welfare system.","PeriodicalId":502666,"journal":{"name":"Filosofija. Sociologija","volume":"48 11-12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141382247","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Filosofija. Sociologija
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1