Current Treatment Options in Oncology最新文献

Opinion statement: Neoadjuvant immunotherapy will change the standard of care for advanced resectable cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC) and possibly other non-melanoma skin cancers. With pathological complete response rates around 50% for cSCC in early studies, neoadjuvant therapy allows patients the possibility of significant reduction in tumor size, de-escalation of adjuvant therapy, and improved long-term outcomes. Patients must be carefully selected to ensure that there is a margin of safety with respect to resectability, such that if a tumor progresses on neoadjuvant therapy, there remains a curative surgical option that is acceptable to the patient. The optimal treatment paradigm is an area of active research, with many researchers questioning whether adjuvant therapy, or even local therapy, is necessary in patients who seem to have a complete response. The ability to predict who will respond will become even more critical to answer, as a significant number of patients do not want to risk their disease progressing, especially in cosmetically sensitive areas of the head and neck. Recent studies in melanoma show promise for improved response rates using combination therapies, and these strategies may apply to cSCC as well. The use of LAG-3 inhibitors or mRNA vaccine technology may further improve the utility of neoadjuvant strategies.

Opinion statement: Cancer-associated thrombosis (CAT) has been identified as the second most prevalent cause of death after cancer itself. Moreover, the risk of thrombotic events in cancer patients increases due to anticancer drugs, such as tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). Venous thromboembolism (VTE) as well as arterial thromboembolic (ATE) events are present in CAT. Although VTE occurs more frequently, ATE events are very significant and in some cases are more dangerous than VTE. Guidelines for preventing thrombosis refer mainly VTE as well as the contribution of ATE events. Several factors are involved in thrombosis related to cancer, but the whole pathomechanism of thrombosis is not clear and may differ between patients. The activation of the coagulation system and the interaction of cancer cells with other cells including platelets, endothelial cells, monocytes, and neutrophils are promoted by a hypercoagulable state caused by cancer. We present an update on the pathomechanisms of CAT and the effect of anticancer drugs, mainly targeted therapies with a focus on TKIs. Considering the risk of bleeding associated with anticoagulation in each cancer patient, the anticoagulation strategy may involve the use of FXIa inhibitors, direct oral anticoagulants, and low-molecular-weight heparin. Further research would be valuable in developing strategies for reducing CAT.

Opinion statement: Malignant gliomas are common central nervous system tumors that pose a significant clinical challenge due to the lack of effective treatments. Glioblastoma (GBM), a grade 4 malignant glioma, is the most prevalent primary malignant brain tumor and is associated with poor prognosis. Current clinical trials are exploring various strategies to combat GBM, with oncolytic viruses (OVs) appearing particularly promising. In addition to ongoing and recently completed clinical trials, one OV (Teserpaturev, Delytact®) received provisional approval for GBM treatment in Japan. OVs are designed to selectively target and eliminate cancer cells while promoting changes in the tumor microenvironment that can trigger and support long-lasting anti-tumor immunity. OVs offer the potential to remodel the tumor microenvironment and reverse systemic immune exhaustion. Additionally, an increasing number of OVs are armed with immunomodulatory payloads or combined with immunotherapy approaches in an effort to promote anti-tumor responses in a tumor-targeted manner. Recently completed oncolytic virotherapy trials can guide the way for future treatment individualization through patient preselection, enhancing the likelihood of achieving the highest possible clinical success. These trials also offer valuable insight into the numerous challenges inherent in malignant glioma treatment, some of which OVs can help overcome.

Opinion statement: The management of metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) has evolved in the past decade due to substantial advances in understanding the genomic landscape and biology underpinning this form of prostate cancer. The implementation of various therapeutic agents has improved overall survival but despite the promising advances in therapeutic options, mCRPC remains incurable. The focus of treatment should be not only to improve survival but also to preserve the patient's quality of life (QoL) and ameliorate cancer-related symptoms such as pain. The choice and sequence of therapy for mCRPC patients are complex and influenced by various factors, such as side effects, disease burden, treatment history, comorbidities, patient preference and, more recently, the presence of actionable genomic alterations or biomarkers. Docetaxel is the first-line treatment for chemo-naïve patients with good performance status and those who have yet to progress on docetaxel in the castration-sensitive setting. Novel androgen agents (NHAs), such as abiraterone and enzalutamide, are effective treatment options that are utilized as second-line options. These medications can be considered upfront in frail patients or patients who are NHA naïve. Current guidelines recommend genetic testing in mCRPC for mutations in DNA repair deficiency genes to inform treatment decisions, as for example in breast cancer gene mutation testing. Other potential biomarkers being investigated include phosphatase and tensin homologues and homologous recombination repair genes. Despite a growing number of studies incorporating biomarkers in their trial designs, to date, only olaparib in the PROFOUND study and lutetium-177 in the VISION trial have improved survival. This is an unmet need, and future trials should focus on biomarker-guided treatment strategies. The advent of novel noncytotoxic agents has enhanced targeted drug delivery and improved treatment responses with favourable toxicity profiling. Trials should continue to incorporate and report health-related QoL scores and functional assessments into their trial designs.

Opinion statement: Soft tissue sarcomas (STS) are rare tumours of mesenchymal origin, most commonly occurring in the extremity but also in the retroperitoneum. The curative treatment for STS is radical surgery with wide margins, in some cases in combination with perioperative radiotherapy and chemotherapy. Nonradical resection (R2) of STS has been an emerging issue in recent decades, as optimal subsequent management remains debatable. Similarly, there is still no consensus on optimal surgical margins. Combining multiple treatment modalities in adjuvant therapy can achieve local and distant control in patients following surgery with positive margins. Patients who have undergone nonradical resection therefore require additional surgical interventions, and adjuvant radiotherapy resulting in a better prognosis but a higher number of complications. Following non-radical treatment, patients with limb and trunk wall sarcomas and retroperitoneal sarcomas should also undergo increased oncological surveillance. Given the potential issues that may emerge in such clinical situations, it is crucial to up-date the current guidelines to enhance the long-term prognosis of these patients.

Opinion statement: Pathogenic germline variants in the setting of several associated cancer predisposition syndromes (CPS) may lead to the development of sarcoma. We would consider testing for a CPS in patients with a strong family history of cancer, multiple primary malignancies, and/or pediatric/adolescent/young adult patients diagnosed with other malignancies strongly associated with CPS. When a CPS is diagnosed in a patient with sarcoma, additional treatment considerations and imaging options for those patients are required. This applies particularly to the use of radiation therapy, ionizing radiation with diagnostic imaging, and the use of alkylating chemotherapy. As data and guidelines are currently lacking for many of these scenarios, we have adopted a shared decision-making process with patients and their families. If the best chance for cure in a patient with CPS requires utilization of radiation therapy or alkylating chemotherapy, we discuss the risks with the patient but do not omit these modalities. However, if there are treatment options that yield equivalent survival rates, yet avoid these modalities, we elect for those options. Considering staging imaging and post-therapy evaluation for sarcoma recurrence, we avoid surveillance techniques that utilize ionizing radiation when possible but do not completely omit them when their use is indicated.

Opinion statement: Rhabdomyosarcoma, a soft tissue sarcoma commonly observed in childhood, requires multidisciplinary treatment, including surgical tumor resection, chemotherapy, and radiation therapy. Although long-term survival can be expected in patients with localized rhabdomyosarcoma, the clinical outcomes in patients with metastatic or unresectable rhabdomyosarcoma remain unsatisfactory. To improve the outcomes of rhabdomyosarcoma, it is important to explore effective systemic treatments for metastatic rhabdomyosarcoma. Currently, multiagent chemotherapy comprising vincristine, actinomycin D, and ifosfamide/cyclophosphamide remains standard systemic treatment for rhabdomyosarcoma. On the other hand, new treatment, such as immune checkpoint inhibitors and molecular targeted drugs, have demonstrated superior clinical outcomes compared to those of standard treatments in various type of malignancies. Therefore, it is necessary to assess the efficacies of these treatments in patients with rhabdomyosarcoma. Recent clinical studies have shown efficacies and safeties of temozolomide combined with vincristine/irinotecan, olaratumab combined with doxorubicin or vincristine/irinotecan, and long-term maintenance therapy. Furthermore, basic researches demonstrated new therapeutic targets. Future studies using these approaches are required to assess their clinical significances.

Opinion statement: Non-melanoma skin cancers (NMSCs) are the most common malignancy and surgical excision is considered treatment of choice for the majority of cases. However, surgery can be very extensive in cases of large, multiple, or cosmetic-sensitive tumors located on areas such as scalp and face or genital region, leading to significant functional and cosmetic deficit. Aminolaevulinic acid photodynamic therapy (ALA-PDT) has emerged as a widely used approach in a variety of skin diseases, demonstrating remarkable efficacy in treatment of actinic keratosis, Bowen disease and basal cell carcinoma. Besides, when employed as a preoperative intervention, ALA-PDT effectively reduces tumor size and minimizes subsequent local surgical morbidity. With its minimally invasive nature and proven effectiveness, ALA-PDT holds significant promise as a neoadjuvant treatment option for NMSCs. In cases where the tumor is large, invasive, multiple, or located in cosmetically and functionally sensitive areas, or when considering patient factors such as age, comorbidity, willingness to undergo surgery, and post-operative quality-of-life, surgical intervention or radiotherapy alone may be impracticable or unacceptable. In such scenarios, neoadjuvant ALA-PDT can offer remarkable outcomes. In order to further ensure the maximum benefit of patients from neoadjuvant PDT, collaboration with multidisciplinary teams and whole-process management may be in need.

Opinion statement: A majority of patients with lower-risk myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) will present with or develop anemia. Anemia in MDS is associated with decreased quality of life and may correlate with decreased progression-free survival and overall survival. In this state of the art review we summarize current risk stratification approaches to identify lower-risk MDS (LR-MDS), the natural history of the disease, and meaningful clinical endpoints. The treatment landscape of LR-MDS with anemia is also rapidly evolving; we review the role of supportive care, erythropoietin stimulating agents, lenalidomide, luspatercept, hypomethylating agents (HMAs), and immunosuppressive therapy (IST) in the management of LR-MDS with anemia. In patients with deletion 5q (del5q) syndrome lenalidomide has both efficacy and durability of response. For patients without del5q who need treatment, the management approach is impacted by serum erythropoietin (EPO) level, SF3B1 mutation status, and ring sideroblast status. Given the data from the Phase III COMMANDS trial, we utilize luspatercept in those with SF3B1 mutation or ring sideroblasts that have an EPO level < 500 U/L; in patients without an SF3B1 mutation or ring sideroblasts there is equipoise between luspatercept and use of an erythropoietin stimulating agent (ESA). For patients who have an EPO level ≥ 500 U/L or have been previously treated there is not a clear standard of care. For those without previous luspatercept exposure it can be considered particularly if there is an SF3B1 mutation or the presence of ring sideroblasts. Other options include HMAs or IST; the Phase III IMERGE trial supports the efficacy of the telomerase inhibitor imetelstat in this setting and this may become a standard option in the future as well.