Virginia D. Schmith, Danielle Graden, Joy Schleyer, Stephen P. Wanaski
Ecopipam, a selective dopamine D1 receptor antagonist in development for Tourette syndrome, is primarily converted by uridine diphosphate-glucuronosyltransferase (UGT)1A9 to ecopipam glucuronide, with a minor metabolic pathway by cytochrome P450 3A4 forming EBS-101-40853 (also referred to as N-desmethylecopipam or SCH 40853; also glucuronidated by UGT1A9). This open-label, fixed-sequence study evaluated the effect of mefenamic acid (UGT1A9 inhibitor) and divalproex sodium extended release (ER; general UGT inhibitor) on the pharmacokinetics (PK) of ecopipam and its metabolites. Ecopipam 179.2 mg was administered on Day 1. Cohort A received mefenamic acid 250 mg every 6 h from Days 7 to 13, with ecopipam 179.2 mg co-administered on Day 7. Cohort B received divalproex sodium ER 1250 mg once daily from Days 7 to 16, with ecopipam 179.2 mg co-administered on Day 10. A total of 38 healthy individuals (mean [SD] age, 38.2 [8.3] years; 81.6% male) had ≥ 1 post-dose safety or PK assessment, and 31 completed the study. Ecopipam alone or with UGT inhibitors was well tolerated. Mefenamic acid increased the Cmax of ecopipam (21%) and EBS-101-40853 (12%) and AUCinf of ecopipam (45%) and EBS-101-40853 (42%), but did not substantially alter the PK of ecopipam glucuronide or EBS-101-40853 glucuronide. Divalproex sodium ER increased the Cmax (66%) and AUCinf (2.1×) of ecopipam, increased the Cmax (40%) and AUCinf (86%) of EBS-101-40853, and decreased the Cmax of ecopipam glucuronide and EBS-101-40853 glucuronide (23% and 32%, respectively). Inhibition of ecopipam metabolism indicated that ecopipam dose adjustments may be needed when administered with UGT inhibitors.
{"title":"The Effect of Uridine Diphosphate-Glucuronosyltransferase Inhibition on the Pharmacokinetics of Ecopipam and Its Metabolites","authors":"Virginia D. Schmith, Danielle Graden, Joy Schleyer, Stephen P. Wanaski","doi":"10.1111/cts.70495","DOIUrl":"10.1111/cts.70495","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Ecopipam, a selective dopamine D1 receptor antagonist in development for Tourette syndrome, is primarily converted by uridine diphosphate-glucuronosyltransferase (UGT)1A9 to ecopipam glucuronide, with a minor metabolic pathway by cytochrome P450 3A4 forming EBS-101-40853 (also referred to as N-desmethylecopipam or SCH 40853; also glucuronidated by UGT1A9). This open-label, fixed-sequence study evaluated the effect of mefenamic acid (UGT1A9 inhibitor) and divalproex sodium extended release (ER; general UGT inhibitor) on the pharmacokinetics (PK) of ecopipam and its metabolites. Ecopipam 179.2 mg was administered on Day 1. Cohort A received mefenamic acid 250 mg every 6 h from Days 7 to 13, with ecopipam 179.2 mg co-administered on Day 7. Cohort B received divalproex sodium ER 1250 mg once daily from Days 7 to 16, with ecopipam 179.2 mg co-administered on Day 10. A total of 38 healthy individuals (mean [SD] age, 38.2 [8.3] years; 81.6% male) had ≥ 1 post-dose safety or PK assessment, and 31 completed the study. Ecopipam alone or with UGT inhibitors was well tolerated. Mefenamic acid increased the <i>C</i><sub>max</sub> of ecopipam (21%) and EBS-101-40853 (12%) and AUC<sub>inf</sub> of ecopipam (45%) and EBS-101-40853 (42%), but did not substantially alter the PK of ecopipam glucuronide or EBS-101-40853 glucuronide. Divalproex sodium ER increased the <i>C</i><sub>max</sub> (66%) and AUC<sub>inf</sub> (2.1×) of ecopipam, increased the <i>C</i><sub>max</sub> (40%) and AUC<sub>inf</sub> (86%) of EBS-101-40853, and decreased the <i>C</i><sub>max</sub> of ecopipam glucuronide and EBS-101-40853 glucuronide (23% and 32%, respectively). Inhibition of ecopipam metabolism indicated that ecopipam dose adjustments may be needed when administered with UGT inhibitors.</p>","PeriodicalId":50610,"journal":{"name":"Cts-Clinical and Translational Science","volume":"19 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2026-02-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12907572/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146203425","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
J. Etkins, G. C. So, J. B. L. Lu, et al., “Genotype–Specific Safety and Pharmacokinetics of Cannabidiol in Healthy Volunteers,” Clinical and Translational Science 19 (2026): e70455, https://doi.org/10.1111/cts.70455.
In the article cited above, Figures 4 (single dose) and 5 (steady state) were transposed. Figure 5 was published in the place of Figure 4 and vice versa.