Pub Date : 2023-09-21DOI: 10.1177/22925503231201631
Oluwatobi R. Olaiya, Minh Huynh, Tega Ebeye, Lucas Gallo, Lawrence Mbuagbaw, Matthew McRae
Purpose: It is unknown whether early mobilization after cubital tunnel decompression improves functional outcomes without increasing complication risks. This systematic review aims to evaluate the effectiveness of early mobilization compared to delayed mobilization of the elbow after ulnar nerve decompression. Methods: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies comparing adults who received early mobilization or late mobilization were included. Embase, MEDLINE, CENTRAL, PEDro, clinicaltrials.gov, and the World Health Organization database were systematically searched from inception to January 2023. Results: Of the 2183 studies identified and screened, five studies (two RCT and three observational) totaling 224 patients (232 elbows) were included in this review. Evidence from two RCTs (100 patients) suggests that early mobilization may result in a large reduction in the amount of time needed to return to work (mean difference 40.1 days, 95% confidence interval [CI] 16-64 days earlier, I 2 = 85%, low-certainty evidence) and little to no difference in grip strength (0 kg, 95% CI = −0.17 to 0.17, I 2 = 0%, low-certainty evidence). There was little to no difference in adverse events or range of motion (low to very-low certainty evidence). Pooled results from the three observational studies showed similar findings (very low-certainty evidence). There were no studies that evaluated upper extremity related quality of life. Conclusion: Immobilizing patients for periods longer than 3 days appears to delay patient's return to work with no appreciable clinical benefit.
{"title":"Immediate Versus Delayed Mobilization After Cubital Tunnel Release Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis","authors":"Oluwatobi R. Olaiya, Minh Huynh, Tega Ebeye, Lucas Gallo, Lawrence Mbuagbaw, Matthew McRae","doi":"10.1177/22925503231201631","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/22925503231201631","url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: It is unknown whether early mobilization after cubital tunnel decompression improves functional outcomes without increasing complication risks. This systematic review aims to evaluate the effectiveness of early mobilization compared to delayed mobilization of the elbow after ulnar nerve decompression. Methods: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies comparing adults who received early mobilization or late mobilization were included. Embase, MEDLINE, CENTRAL, PEDro, clinicaltrials.gov, and the World Health Organization database were systematically searched from inception to January 2023. Results: Of the 2183 studies identified and screened, five studies (two RCT and three observational) totaling 224 patients (232 elbows) were included in this review. Evidence from two RCTs (100 patients) suggests that early mobilization may result in a large reduction in the amount of time needed to return to work (mean difference 40.1 days, 95% confidence interval [CI] 16-64 days earlier, I 2 = 85%, low-certainty evidence) and little to no difference in grip strength (0 kg, 95% CI = −0.17 to 0.17, I 2 = 0%, low-certainty evidence). There was little to no difference in adverse events or range of motion (low to very-low certainty evidence). Pooled results from the three observational studies showed similar findings (very low-certainty evidence). There were no studies that evaluated upper extremity related quality of life. Conclusion: Immobilizing patients for periods longer than 3 days appears to delay patient's return to work with no appreciable clinical benefit.","PeriodicalId":50714,"journal":{"name":"Plastic Surgery","volume":"44 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"136155046","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-09-11DOI: 10.1177/22925503231199769
Lucas Gallo, Oluwatobi Olaiya, Sophocles Voineskos, Mark McRae
{"title":"Acellular Dermal Matrices in Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction—Do We Need It?","authors":"Lucas Gallo, Oluwatobi Olaiya, Sophocles Voineskos, Mark McRae","doi":"10.1177/22925503231199769","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/22925503231199769","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":50714,"journal":{"name":"Plastic Surgery","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"136023650","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-09-07DOI: 10.1177/22925503231198091
Douglas J. Courtemanche
{"title":"Invited Discussion: Excess Opioid Medication and Variation in Prescribing Patterns Following Common Breast Procedures","authors":"Douglas J. Courtemanche","doi":"10.1177/22925503231198091","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/22925503231198091","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":50714,"journal":{"name":"Plastic Surgery","volume":"57 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-09-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135046925","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-05-18DOI: 10.1177/22925503231177608
Steven Morris, Earl Campbell
{"title":"Canadian Society of Plastic Surgeons / Société Canadienne Des Chirurgiens Plasticiens","authors":"Steven Morris, Earl Campbell","doi":"10.1177/22925503231177608","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/22925503231177608","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":50714,"journal":{"name":"Plastic Surgery","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-05-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135768236","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-05-18DOI: 10.1177/22925503231177609
Ronen Avram, Jennifer Matthews
{"title":"Groupe pour l’Avancement de la Microchirurgie Canada (GAM)","authors":"Ronen Avram, Jennifer Matthews","doi":"10.1177/22925503231177609","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/22925503231177609","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":50714,"journal":{"name":"Plastic Surgery","volume":"38 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-05-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135768235","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2012-08-01DOI: 10.1177/229255031202000310
Background In up to 2% of all pregnancies, the need for general anesthesia in a nonobstetrical surgery arises. Surgery on a pregnant woman may have significant implications for the fetus, patient, physician and hospital. On review of the plastic surgery literature, the authors were unable to find current guidelines or recommendations for preoperative pregnancy testing in the plastic surgery patient population. Methods Literature regarding maternal and fetal risk during anesthesia and surgery, as well as preoperative pregnancy testing was identified by performing a PubMed, OVID and MEDLINE key word search. The current literature was subsequently reviewed and summarized. Results A report by the American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Preanesthesia Evaluation allows physicians and hospitals to implement their own policies and practices with regard to preoperative pregnancy testing. The overall frequency of an incidentally found positive preoperative pregnancy test ranges from 0.34% to 2.4%. Discussion Various studies have reported increased rates of spontaneous abortions, congenital anomalies, such as neural tube defects, and low and very low birth weight infants born to mothers exposed to anesthesia and surgery during pregnancy. Because the accepted practice is to postpone elective surgery during pregnancy, identifying these patients before surgery is critical. Conclusions Based on the current evidence, the authors' best practice recommendation for preoperative pregnancy testing is provided.
{"title":"Preoperative pregnancy testing","authors":"","doi":"10.1177/229255031202000310","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/229255031202000310","url":null,"abstract":"Background In up to 2% of all pregnancies, the need for general anesthesia in a nonobstetrical surgery arises. Surgery on a pregnant woman may have significant implications for the fetus, patient, physician and hospital. On review of the plastic surgery literature, the authors were unable to find current guidelines or recommendations for preoperative pregnancy testing in the plastic surgery patient population. Methods Literature regarding maternal and fetal risk during anesthesia and surgery, as well as preoperative pregnancy testing was identified by performing a PubMed, OVID and MEDLINE key word search. The current literature was subsequently reviewed and summarized. Results A report by the American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Preanesthesia Evaluation allows physicians and hospitals to implement their own policies and practices with regard to preoperative pregnancy testing. The overall frequency of an incidentally found positive preoperative pregnancy test ranges from 0.34% to 2.4%. Discussion Various studies have reported increased rates of spontaneous abortions, congenital anomalies, such as neural tube defects, and low and very low birth weight infants born to mothers exposed to anesthesia and surgery during pregnancy. Because the accepted practice is to postpone elective surgery during pregnancy, identifying these patients before surgery is critical. Conclusions Based on the current evidence, the authors' best practice recommendation for preoperative pregnancy testing is provided.","PeriodicalId":50714,"journal":{"name":"Plastic Surgery","volume":"30 1","pages":"32 - 34"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7,"publicationDate":"2012-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"85751837","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2012-08-01DOI: 10.4172/PLASTIC-SURGERY.1000766
H. Sinno, J. Lutfy, Youssef Tahiri, Omar Fouda Neel, M. Gilardino
Background With the associations between investigators and funding sources becoming increasingly complicated, conflicts of interest may arise that could potentially cause biases in the reporting of results. Objective To determine the number of published plastic surgery articles that lack reporting of disclosures. Methods An online review of four major North American plastic surgery journal publications from January 1, 2007 to December 31, 2007, was performed. For identification and to provide anonymity, journals were assigned a letter from A to D. Results Of the 1759 articles reviewed, 726 (41%) were included. Disclosure was not reported in 368 (51%) articles: Journal A (n=10, 3%), Journal B (n=153, 85%), Journal C (n=193, 93%) and Journal D (n=12, 32%). Journals differed significantly in their reporting of disclosure (P<0.01). Conclusion In the plastic surgery journals reviewed, the lack of documentation of disclosures was frequent. To ensure identification of bias in plastic surgery publications, a section dedicated to disclosure statements is recommended for each published article.
{"title":"Reporting disclosures to the reader in plastic surgery journal publications","authors":"H. Sinno, J. Lutfy, Youssef Tahiri, Omar Fouda Neel, M. Gilardino","doi":"10.4172/PLASTIC-SURGERY.1000766","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4172/PLASTIC-SURGERY.1000766","url":null,"abstract":"Background With the associations between investigators and funding sources becoming increasingly complicated, conflicts of interest may arise that could potentially cause biases in the reporting of results. Objective To determine the number of published plastic surgery articles that lack reporting of disclosures. Methods An online review of four major North American plastic surgery journal publications from January 1, 2007 to December 31, 2007, was performed. For identification and to provide anonymity, journals were assigned a letter from A to D. Results Of the 1759 articles reviewed, 726 (41%) were included. Disclosure was not reported in 368 (51%) articles: Journal A (n=10, 3%), Journal B (n=153, 85%), Journal C (n=193, 93%) and Journal D (n=12, 32%). Journals differed significantly in their reporting of disclosure (P<0.01). Conclusion In the plastic surgery journals reviewed, the lack of documentation of disclosures was frequent. To ensure identification of bias in plastic surgery publications, a section dedicated to disclosure statements is recommended for each published article.","PeriodicalId":50714,"journal":{"name":"Plastic Surgery","volume":"12 1","pages":"35 - 36"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7,"publicationDate":"2012-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"77581279","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2012-05-01DOI: 10.1177/229255031202000210
Background Deformities or loss of the earlobe may be congenital, or acquired due to trauma, bites, burns or tumour excision. A variety of single-stage and two-stage procedures have been described for earlobe reconstruction, of which Gavello's procedure was one of the earliest. Objective To revisit Gavello's procedure with reference to the vascular supply of the flap, and discuss the relevance of the technique in current practice. Methods The authors discuss the vascular basis of Gavello's flap, and describe the clinical application of the single-stage Gavello's procedure in diverse clinical situations, including congenital absence of earlobe, post-burn earlobe deformity and traumatic amputation of the earlobe. Results Excellent cosmetic results have been achieved in all different clinical situations in the authors' experience, with preservation of earlobe shape and volume, good colour match and a well-concealed scar in the donor area. Discussion Gavello's procedure is a simple, one-stage procedure that relies entirely on local tissue for earlobe reconstruction; the flap has a predictable vascular supply, skin grafting is not required and the procedure can be used for large defects. An intact donor area over the postauricular mastoid region is a prerequisite. Conclusion The simple, century-old Gavello's procedure is still of great value for reconstruction of earlobe defects of diverse etiology.
{"title":"Revisiting Gavello's procedure for single-stage reconstruction of the earlobe: The vascular basis, technique and clinical uses","authors":"","doi":"10.1177/229255031202000210","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/229255031202000210","url":null,"abstract":"Background Deformities or loss of the earlobe may be congenital, or acquired due to trauma, bites, burns or tumour excision. A variety of single-stage and two-stage procedures have been described for earlobe reconstruction, of which Gavello's procedure was one of the earliest. Objective To revisit Gavello's procedure with reference to the vascular supply of the flap, and discuss the relevance of the technique in current practice. Methods The authors discuss the vascular basis of Gavello's flap, and describe the clinical application of the single-stage Gavello's procedure in diverse clinical situations, including congenital absence of earlobe, post-burn earlobe deformity and traumatic amputation of the earlobe. Results Excellent cosmetic results have been achieved in all different clinical situations in the authors' experience, with preservation of earlobe shape and volume, good colour match and a well-concealed scar in the donor area. Discussion Gavello's procedure is a simple, one-stage procedure that relies entirely on local tissue for earlobe reconstruction; the flap has a predictable vascular supply, skin grafting is not required and the procedure can be used for large defects. An intact donor area over the postauricular mastoid region is a prerequisite. Conclusion The simple, century-old Gavello's procedure is still of great value for reconstruction of earlobe defects of diverse etiology.","PeriodicalId":50714,"journal":{"name":"Plastic Surgery","volume":"260 ","pages":"22 - 24"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7,"publicationDate":"2012-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"72555587","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2012-02-01DOI: 10.1177/229255031202000112
C. Fulton, R. Grewal, K. Faber, J. Roth, B. Gan
Background Ulnar-sided wrist pain is a common problem in the upper extremity. It affects a broad patient population and can be difficult to treat. Ulnar impaction syndrome (UIS) is major cause of ulnar-sided wrist pain and a number of different operations have been used to correct it, including ulnar shortening osteotomy (USO). Objective To retrospectively review functional outcomes and complication rates of USO for UIS at the Hand and Upper Limb Centre (London, Ontario) over a two-year period. Methods Twenty-eight patients who underwent USO between 2007 and 2009 participated in the present study. Ulnar variance pre- and post-surgery was assessed using standard radiographic examination. Patient-rated outcomes were measured using a visual analogue scale (VAS) for pain and the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) survey for functional outcomes. Objective grip strength and range of motion were compared with the contralateral extremity. Results On average, USO achieved a 3.11 mm reduction in ulnar variance. Nonunion occurred in five patients and required a secondary bone grafting procedure. All USO eventually healed. Overall, pain improved by 47.2% and the mean DASH score after surgery was 37.21. Flexion, extension and supination range of motion decreased by 10° compared with the unaffected side. Eleven patients (39%) elected to undergo a second surgery for hardware removal. Patients receiving compensation from the Workplace Safety and Insurance Board experienced significantly higher residual pain (VSA 5.24 versus 1.97) and disability levels (DASH 60.23 versus 25.70). Smokers also experienced worse outcomes in terms of pain (VSA 4.43 versus 2.36) and disability (DASH 51.06 versus 29.67). In this cohort, smoking was not associated with a higher rate of nonunion. Conclusion USO is effective in reducing pain in UIS and improves disability, at the price of a small decrease in range of motion. Smokers and people receiving compensation from the Workplace Safety and Insurance Board, however, have significantly worse subjective outcomes (VAS and DASH), but similar objective outcomes (range of motion).
背景尺侧腕关节疼痛是上肢常见的问题。它影响广泛的患者群体，并且可能难以治疗。尺侧嵌塞综合征(UIS)是导致尺侧腕关节疼痛的主要原因，有许多不同的手术可以矫正，包括尺侧缩短截骨术(USO)。目的回顾性评价在安大略省伦敦市手上肢中心(London, Ontario)接受USO治疗的2年多来UIS患者的功能结局和并发症发生率。方法对2007 ~ 2009年间行USO手术的28例患者进行研究。术前和术后用标准放射检查评估尺侧变异。使用视觉模拟量表(VAS)测量疼痛，使用手臂、肩膀和手的残疾(DASH)调查测量功能结果。目的与对侧肢体握力和活动范围进行比较。结果USO术后尺侧方差平均减小3.11 mm。5例患者出现骨不连，需要进行二次植骨手术。所有USO最终都痊愈了。总体而言，疼痛改善了47.2%，术后平均DASH评分为37.21分。与未受影响的一侧相比，屈伸和旋后活动范围减小了10°。11例患者(39%)选择进行第二次硬体取出手术。从工作场所安全与保险委员会获得补偿的患者经历了明显更高的残余疼痛(VSA 5.24 vs 1.97)和残疾水平(DASH 60.23 vs 25.70)。吸烟者在疼痛(VSA 4.43 vs 2.36)和残疾(DASH 51.06 vs 29.67)方面也经历了更差的结果。在这个队列中，吸烟与较高的骨不连率无关。结论USO能有效减轻UIS患者的疼痛，改善残疾，但活动范围较小。然而，吸烟者和接受工作场所安全与保险委员会(Workplace Safety and Insurance Board)补偿的人的主观结果(VAS和DASH)明显更差，但客观结果(活动范围)相似。
{"title":"Outcome analysis of ulnar shortening osteotomy for ulnar impaction syndrome","authors":"C. Fulton, R. Grewal, K. Faber, J. Roth, B. Gan","doi":"10.1177/229255031202000112","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/229255031202000112","url":null,"abstract":"Background Ulnar-sided wrist pain is a common problem in the upper extremity. It affects a broad patient population and can be difficult to treat. Ulnar impaction syndrome (UIS) is major cause of ulnar-sided wrist pain and a number of different operations have been used to correct it, including ulnar shortening osteotomy (USO). Objective To retrospectively review functional outcomes and complication rates of USO for UIS at the Hand and Upper Limb Centre (London, Ontario) over a two-year period. Methods Twenty-eight patients who underwent USO between 2007 and 2009 participated in the present study. Ulnar variance pre- and post-surgery was assessed using standard radiographic examination. Patient-rated outcomes were measured using a visual analogue scale (VAS) for pain and the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) survey for functional outcomes. Objective grip strength and range of motion were compared with the contralateral extremity. Results On average, USO achieved a 3.11 mm reduction in ulnar variance. Nonunion occurred in five patients and required a secondary bone grafting procedure. All USO eventually healed. Overall, pain improved by 47.2% and the mean DASH score after surgery was 37.21. Flexion, extension and supination range of motion decreased by 10° compared with the unaffected side. Eleven patients (39%) elected to undergo a second surgery for hardware removal. Patients receiving compensation from the Workplace Safety and Insurance Board experienced significantly higher residual pain (VSA 5.24 versus 1.97) and disability levels (DASH 60.23 versus 25.70). Smokers also experienced worse outcomes in terms of pain (VSA 4.43 versus 2.36) and disability (DASH 51.06 versus 29.67). In this cohort, smoking was not associated with a higher rate of nonunion. Conclusion USO is effective in reducing pain in UIS and improves disability, at the price of a small decrease in range of motion. Smokers and people receiving compensation from the Workplace Safety and Insurance Board, however, have significantly worse subjective outcomes (VAS and DASH), but similar objective outcomes (range of motion).","PeriodicalId":50714,"journal":{"name":"Plastic Surgery","volume":"30 1","pages":"1 - 5"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7,"publicationDate":"2012-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"72932201","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2003-06-01DOI: 10.4172/PLASTIC-SURGERY.1000358
John R Taylor
{"title":"The medical information age","authors":"John R Taylor","doi":"10.4172/PLASTIC-SURGERY.1000358","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4172/PLASTIC-SURGERY.1000358","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":50714,"journal":{"name":"Plastic Surgery","volume":"2 1","pages":"1 - 1"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7,"publicationDate":"2003-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"73794525","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：