Infection and Drug Resistance最新文献

Purpose: Nosocomial fever (NF) is a common sign of healthcare-associated infection; however, infection is not always followed up. We studied the etiology, clinical characteristics, and outcomes of nosocomial fever in hospitalized patients.

Patients and methods: Between October 2019 and December 2020, we enrolled subjects from general medical wards who developed fever ≥48 hours after hospital admission or who were admitted with fever, defervesced, and then developed a fever ≥7 days later that was unrelated to the cause for admission. Subjects with NF underwent a comprehensive clinical evaluation and laboratory investigations.

Results: Eighty-six cases of NF were identified and completely followed, the mean age was 69.29 years, and 35 were male. Fifty-seven were from infectious etiologies, 28 from non-infectious etiologies, and one case was unable to be determined. Hospital-associated pneumonia (47.4%) and urinary tract infection (22.8%) were the most common infectious causes, and malignancy (17.8%) and large hematoma (14.3%) were the most common non-infectious causes. The median day of onset of NF following hospitalization was 12 (4.7-21.2) days. Acute physiology and chronic health evaluation II (APACHE II) score (14.70 vs 11.97, p = 0.02), sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) scores (4 vs 2, p < 0.01), pertinent clinical findings (82.5% vs 42.9%, p < 0.01), blood urea nitrogen (BUN) (37.30 vs 21.10, p = 0.03) and creatinine (1.41 vs 0.97, p = 0.05) levels, and abnormal chest radiography (45.6% vs 3.6%, p < 0.01) had significant differences between infectious and non-infectious etiologies. Twenty-three subjects (26.7%) died. The presence of end-stage renal disease (ESRD) [OR 19.49 (1.77-214.18), p = 0.015], SOFA score >6 [OR 5.18 (1.04-25.90), p = 0.045], and abnormal chest radiography [OR 3.45 (1.16-10.29), p = 0.026] were significantly associated with mortality.

Conclusion: Nosocomial infections, malignancy, and hematoma were the leading causes of NF. Severity scores, clinical findings, renal function tests, and chest radiography were distinguishing features between infectious and non-infectious etiologies. ESRD, high SOFA scores, and abnormal chest radiography were associated with mortality.

Purpose: Empirical antibiotic therapy should follow the local bacterial susceptibility, and the breakpoints revisions of the antimicrobial susceptibility testing can reflect the changes in the antimicrobial susceptibility of bacteria. This study aimed to analyze whether the changes in the antimicrobial susceptibility to antibiotics caused by the breakpoint revision will affect the empirical antibiotic therapy and its appropriateness.

Patients and methods: A retrospective study was conducted among 831 hospitalized patients infected by Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa from April 10, 2018, to April 11, 2020. We evaluated the appropriateness of empirical therapy based on the antimicrobial susceptibility testing results. The rate of empirical use and appropriateness of fluoroquinolones was calculated, and logistic regression was used to analyze influencing factors of empirical use of fluoroquinolones.

Results: The susceptibility rate of the three bacteria to levofloxacin (50.78% vs 32.06%) and ciprofloxacin (48.45% vs 21.90%) was decreased (P<0.001), while the resistance rate to levofloxacin (45.74% vs 58.73%) and ciprofloxacin (46.90% vs 66.67%) was increased (P<0.001) after the breakpoints revision. The empirical usage rate of fluoroquinolones in patients infected with Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, or Pseudomonas aeruginosa was 20.94%, which was influenced by the breakpoint revision (P=0.022), age (P=0.007), and the department (P=0.006); the appropriateness rate was 28.74%, affected by the pathogenic bacteria (P=0.001) and multidrug-resistant microorganism (P=0.001), department (P=0.024), and the length of stay before the empirical therapy (P=0.016).

Conclusion: The susceptibility of bacteria to antibiotics has changed significantly after the breakpoint revision while the clinicians' empirical therapy failure to change accordingly, which results in the decrease of the appropriateness of empirical use. It is enlightened that we should conduct more research to evaluate the rational use of antibiotics from the laboratory perspective and carry out interventions such as education and supervision to strengthen the collaboration between the microbiology laboratories and clinicians to improve the empirical antibiotic therapy and slow down the antimicrobial resistance.