Pub Date : 2024-01-25DOI: 10.3390/traumacare4010003
Andrea Munoz, Samuel Girguis, Loren Martin, Michael Hollifield
This was a novel pilot study about the relationship between PTSD severity and resource gain and loss using the conservation of resources (COR) model with U.S. Veterans. Higher PTSD severity was predicted to be associated with greater resource loss scores, and lower PTSD scores were predicted to be associated with greater resource gain scores. The sample size was limited (N = 19) due to the COVID-19 outbreak. Veterans completed a demographic questionnaire, the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), the Combat Exposure Scale (CES), the PTSD Symptom Scale–Interview (PSS-I), the Conservation of Resources–Evaluation (COR-E), and two additional open-ended questions. A statistically significant negative medium effect size was found between PTSD diagnosis and resource gain (r(17) = −0.42, p = 0.039, one-tailed). A large effect size in resource gain scores between PTSD and non-PTSD groups was also found (t(17) = 1.880, p = 0.077, d = 0.87), with the non-PTSD group reporting more gain of resources than the PTSD group. Post hoc tests revealed that the resource gain score of the mild PTSD group was significantly higher than that of the severe + very severe PTSD group (p = 0.034). Results suggest that resource gain, when compared to resource loss, was the strongest predictor for a non-PTSD diagnosis.
{"title":"Applying and Extending the Conservation of Resources (COR) Model to Trauma in U.S. Veterans","authors":"Andrea Munoz, Samuel Girguis, Loren Martin, Michael Hollifield","doi":"10.3390/traumacare4010003","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3390/traumacare4010003","url":null,"abstract":"This was a novel pilot study about the relationship between PTSD severity and resource gain and loss using the conservation of resources (COR) model with U.S. Veterans. Higher PTSD severity was predicted to be associated with greater resource loss scores, and lower PTSD scores were predicted to be associated with greater resource gain scores. The sample size was limited (N = 19) due to the COVID-19 outbreak. Veterans completed a demographic questionnaire, the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), the Combat Exposure Scale (CES), the PTSD Symptom Scale–Interview (PSS-I), the Conservation of Resources–Evaluation (COR-E), and two additional open-ended questions. A statistically significant negative medium effect size was found between PTSD diagnosis and resource gain (r(17) = −0.42, p = 0.039, one-tailed). A large effect size in resource gain scores between PTSD and non-PTSD groups was also found (t(17) = 1.880, p = 0.077, d = 0.87), with the non-PTSD group reporting more gain of resources than the PTSD group. Post hoc tests revealed that the resource gain score of the mild PTSD group was significantly higher than that of the severe + very severe PTSD group (p = 0.034). Results suggest that resource gain, when compared to resource loss, was the strongest predictor for a non-PTSD diagnosis.","PeriodicalId":507505,"journal":{"name":"Trauma Care","volume":"110 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-01-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139596749","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-01-21DOI: 10.3390/traumacare4010002
A. Sekely, H. B. Malik, Kayla B. Miller, Yishi Wang, Antonio E. Puente
Objective: Active-duty military personnel in the current wars have experienced unique stressors that deviate from standard PTSD assessment and diagnosis. This situation calls for a refinement of military-related PTSD assessment. To this end, this study assessed the utility of the Trauma Symptom Inventory (TSI) in diagnosing PTSD among active-duty military personnel. The past literature has validated the TSI using populations with a small sample size. Hence, this study aimed to fill the gap by using a large sample size of 670 military members to examine whether the TSI is useful for military populations. Setting: Participants were referred to Carolina Psychological Health Services, in Jacksonville, North Carolina by military neurologists and other qualified medical officers from the Naval Hospital in Camp Lejeune, a military base located in Jacksonville, NC, for neuropsychological evaluation due to reported cognitive deficits related to military deployment (i.e., head injury due to exposure to blast injuries). Participants: Based on clinical diagnosis, comprehensive neuropsychological testing, and self-reported data, personnel were classified into four groups: blast exposure (n = 157), PTSD diagnosis (n = 90), both blast exposure and PTSD (n = 283), and neither blast exposure nor PTSD (n = 140), which helps provide a comprehensive picture of the utility of the TSI. Results: The TSI’s 10 clinical scales could distinguish between all groups. Discriminant function analysis showed that an optimally weighted combination of scales correctly predicted 66.67% of PTSD-positive cases and 35.11% of PTSD-negative cases. Conclusion: These findings provide support for the use of the TSI in the assessment of PTSD in active-duty military personnel. Due to the release of TSI-2, there is a need to replicate this data. However, the validity data has indicated a high concordance between the TSI and TSI-2, bolstering confidence in the current findings of the study.
目的：当前战争中的现役军人经历了与标准创伤后应激障碍评估和诊断不同的独特压力。这种情况要求对与军队相关的创伤后应激障碍评估进行改进。为此，本研究评估了创伤症状量表（TSI）在诊断现役军人创伤后应激障碍方面的实用性。过去的文献使用样本量较小的人群对 TSI 进行了验证。因此，本研究旨在通过使用 670 名军人的大样本量来检验 TSI 是否对军人群体有用，从而填补这一空白。研究环境：参与者由北卡罗来纳州杰克逊维尔勒让营海军医院（位于北卡罗来纳州杰克逊维尔的一个军事基地）的军事神经科医生和其他合格的医务人员转介到北卡罗来纳州杰克逊维尔的卡罗莱纳心理健康服务机构进行神经心理学评估，因为据报告，参与者的认知缺陷与军事部署有关（即因暴露于爆炸伤害而导致头部受伤）。参与者：根据临床诊断、综合神经心理学测试和自我报告的数据，参与者被分为四组：爆炸暴露（157 人）、创伤后应激障碍诊断（90 人）、爆炸暴露和创伤后应激障碍（283 人）以及既无爆炸暴露也无创伤后应激障碍（140 人），这有助于全面了解 TSI 的实用性。结果：TSI 的 10 个临床量表可以区分所有组别。判别函数分析表明，经过优化加权的量表组合可正确预测 66.67% 的创伤后应激障碍阳性病例和 35.11% 的创伤后应激障碍阴性病例。结论这些研究结果为使用 TSI 评估现役军人的创伤后应激障碍提供了支持。由于 TSI-2 的发布，有必要复制这些数据。不过，有效性数据表明 TSI 和 TSI-2 高度一致，增强了人们对当前研究结果的信心。
{"title":"Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder and Blast Exposure in Active-Duty Military Service Members","authors":"A. Sekely, H. B. Malik, Kayla B. Miller, Yishi Wang, Antonio E. Puente","doi":"10.3390/traumacare4010002","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3390/traumacare4010002","url":null,"abstract":"Objective: Active-duty military personnel in the current wars have experienced unique stressors that deviate from standard PTSD assessment and diagnosis. This situation calls for a refinement of military-related PTSD assessment. To this end, this study assessed the utility of the Trauma Symptom Inventory (TSI) in diagnosing PTSD among active-duty military personnel. The past literature has validated the TSI using populations with a small sample size. Hence, this study aimed to fill the gap by using a large sample size of 670 military members to examine whether the TSI is useful for military populations. Setting: Participants were referred to Carolina Psychological Health Services, in Jacksonville, North Carolina by military neurologists and other qualified medical officers from the Naval Hospital in Camp Lejeune, a military base located in Jacksonville, NC, for neuropsychological evaluation due to reported cognitive deficits related to military deployment (i.e., head injury due to exposure to blast injuries). Participants: Based on clinical diagnosis, comprehensive neuropsychological testing, and self-reported data, personnel were classified into four groups: blast exposure (n = 157), PTSD diagnosis (n = 90), both blast exposure and PTSD (n = 283), and neither blast exposure nor PTSD (n = 140), which helps provide a comprehensive picture of the utility of the TSI. Results: The TSI’s 10 clinical scales could distinguish between all groups. Discriminant function analysis showed that an optimally weighted combination of scales correctly predicted 66.67% of PTSD-positive cases and 35.11% of PTSD-negative cases. Conclusion: These findings provide support for the use of the TSI in the assessment of PTSD in active-duty military personnel. Due to the release of TSI-2, there is a need to replicate this data. However, the validity data has indicated a high concordance between the TSI and TSI-2, bolstering confidence in the current findings of the study.","PeriodicalId":507505,"journal":{"name":"Trauma Care","volume":"17 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139610261","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-12-19DOI: 10.3390/traumacare4010001
Lise Mumporeze, Chantal Uwamahoro, D. Uwamahoro, Aly Beeman, Destry Jensen, O. Y. Tang, Enyonam Odoom, S. Jarmale, S. Garbern, Catalina González Marqués, Andrew Stephen, A. Aluisio
In high-income nations, gender has been associated with injury characteristics. This study evaluated injury epidemiology and care based on gender at the Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Kigali in Rwanda. Patients presenting to the emergency department with acute injuries were prospectively enrolled from 27 January–28 June 2020, and descriptive statistics were performed with comparisons between males and females. Of 601 patients, 25.6% were female and 74.4% were male. There were gender differences in the mechanism of injury, with females more likely to be injured in falls (43.5% versus 23.0%, p = 0.001); meanwhile, males were more likely to suffer road traffic accidents (52.6% versus 39.6%, p = 0.006). The severity of injury was similar between genders based on the mean Kampala Trauma Score (14.4 versus 14.7, p = 0.09). Females were more likely to have been transported by prehospital services (87.7% versus 72.9%, p = 0.001), and less likely to receive acute treatment during the first six hours of care (67.5% versus 78.1%, p = 0.009). There was no significant difference in mortality between females and males (2.0% versus 1.3%, p = 0.568). This study highlights differences in the epidemiology and care between males and females presenting for emergency injury care in Rwanda. These findings can inform future research and developments in gender-centered healthcare delivery.
{"title":"A Comparative Gender Analysis of Injury Characteristics, Treatments and Outcomes among Persons Seeking Emergency Care in Kigali, Rwanda","authors":"Lise Mumporeze, Chantal Uwamahoro, D. Uwamahoro, Aly Beeman, Destry Jensen, O. Y. Tang, Enyonam Odoom, S. Jarmale, S. Garbern, Catalina González Marqués, Andrew Stephen, A. Aluisio","doi":"10.3390/traumacare4010001","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3390/traumacare4010001","url":null,"abstract":"In high-income nations, gender has been associated with injury characteristics. This study evaluated injury epidemiology and care based on gender at the Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Kigali in Rwanda. Patients presenting to the emergency department with acute injuries were prospectively enrolled from 27 January–28 June 2020, and descriptive statistics were performed with comparisons between males and females. Of 601 patients, 25.6% were female and 74.4% were male. There were gender differences in the mechanism of injury, with females more likely to be injured in falls (43.5% versus 23.0%, p = 0.001); meanwhile, males were more likely to suffer road traffic accidents (52.6% versus 39.6%, p = 0.006). The severity of injury was similar between genders based on the mean Kampala Trauma Score (14.4 versus 14.7, p = 0.09). Females were more likely to have been transported by prehospital services (87.7% versus 72.9%, p = 0.001), and less likely to receive acute treatment during the first six hours of care (67.5% versus 78.1%, p = 0.009). There was no significant difference in mortality between females and males (2.0% versus 1.3%, p = 0.568). This study highlights differences in the epidemiology and care between males and females presenting for emergency injury care in Rwanda. These findings can inform future research and developments in gender-centered healthcare delivery.","PeriodicalId":507505,"journal":{"name":"Trauma Care","volume":"74 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139171628","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-12-17DOI: 10.3390/traumacare3040029
Jodie Murphy-Oikonen, J. Vis, Rachel Egan
Decades of research have enhanced our understanding of the psychological impact of sexual victimization, including risk factors through which post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) manifests. Research on sexual assault and PTSD predominately reflects the experience of heterosexual women, yet sexual minorities are both at increased risk of sexual assault and suffer greater negative health outcomes from it. In these cases, PTSD is linked to a clearly identifiable cause, thereby making it possible to identify individuals at risk, enhance interventions immediately following the traumatic event, and offer services to mitigate further harm. This narrative review explores the potential risk factors for PTSS and PTSD among individuals who experience sexual assault and identify as a sexual minority. Knowledge of these compounding risk factors among service providers will assist in obtaining sexual assault disclosures in a sensitive and supportive manner, leading to the provision of early interventions to mitigate the risks of developing PTSD following sexual assault. The findings suggest that empirical investigation is urgently required to develop evidence-informed practices in providing targeted interventions for sexual and gender minorities following a sexual assault and mitigating further adverse health outcomes.
{"title":"Exploring the Increased Risk of Post-Traumatic Stress Following a Sexual Assault: Implications for Individuals Who Identify as a Sexual Minority","authors":"Jodie Murphy-Oikonen, J. Vis, Rachel Egan","doi":"10.3390/traumacare3040029","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3390/traumacare3040029","url":null,"abstract":"Decades of research have enhanced our understanding of the psychological impact of sexual victimization, including risk factors through which post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) manifests. Research on sexual assault and PTSD predominately reflects the experience of heterosexual women, yet sexual minorities are both at increased risk of sexual assault and suffer greater negative health outcomes from it. In these cases, PTSD is linked to a clearly identifiable cause, thereby making it possible to identify individuals at risk, enhance interventions immediately following the traumatic event, and offer services to mitigate further harm. This narrative review explores the potential risk factors for PTSS and PTSD among individuals who experience sexual assault and identify as a sexual minority. Knowledge of these compounding risk factors among service providers will assist in obtaining sexual assault disclosures in a sensitive and supportive manner, leading to the provision of early interventions to mitigate the risks of developing PTSD following sexual assault. The findings suggest that empirical investigation is urgently required to develop evidence-informed practices in providing targeted interventions for sexual and gender minorities following a sexual assault and mitigating further adverse health outcomes.","PeriodicalId":507505,"journal":{"name":"Trauma Care","volume":"726 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139176729","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-12-16DOI: 10.3390/traumacare3040028
J. Avery, E. Galvin, Joanne Deppeler, Helen Skouteris, Justin Roberts, Heather Morris
The aim of this study is three-fold: (1) to explore multiple community member views of core elements of trauma-responsive practice at a specialist school; (2) to explore impact on student wellbeing and learning outcomes, and educator experiences of their workplace; and (3) to explore insights into implementation challenges and enablers. This study uniquely incorporates four participant cohorts: parents or caregivers, educators, and community agencies involved with school students and their families. It utilises a mixed-methods approach with an emphasis on the voice of participants and their lived experience of a trauma-responsive specialist school. The data identify a trauma-responsive school culture, high staff satisfaction, improved student wellbeing and attendance, and progress towards learning goals. Reflective analytic themes centre on a collective experience of the school as a connected community, emphasising relationships, safety, collaboration, mutuality, voice, and empowerment. Findings show that the practices most valued across the cohorts centre on the collective experience of the school as a connected community, emphasising relationships, safety, deep listening, collaboration, mutuality, voice, and empowerment. Trauma-informed principles frame the discussion and implications for equity-focused trauma-responsive practice and policy development. Implications for practice and policy development are discussed.
{"title":"Raising Voice at School: Preliminary Effectiveness and Community Experience of Culture and Practice at an Australian Trauma-Responsive Specialist School","authors":"J. Avery, E. Galvin, Joanne Deppeler, Helen Skouteris, Justin Roberts, Heather Morris","doi":"10.3390/traumacare3040028","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3390/traumacare3040028","url":null,"abstract":"The aim of this study is three-fold: (1) to explore multiple community member views of core elements of trauma-responsive practice at a specialist school; (2) to explore impact on student wellbeing and learning outcomes, and educator experiences of their workplace; and (3) to explore insights into implementation challenges and enablers. This study uniquely incorporates four participant cohorts: parents or caregivers, educators, and community agencies involved with school students and their families. It utilises a mixed-methods approach with an emphasis on the voice of participants and their lived experience of a trauma-responsive specialist school. The data identify a trauma-responsive school culture, high staff satisfaction, improved student wellbeing and attendance, and progress towards learning goals. Reflective analytic themes centre on a collective experience of the school as a connected community, emphasising relationships, safety, collaboration, mutuality, voice, and empowerment. Findings show that the practices most valued across the cohorts centre on the collective experience of the school as a connected community, emphasising relationships, safety, deep listening, collaboration, mutuality, voice, and empowerment. Trauma-informed principles frame the discussion and implications for equity-focused trauma-responsive practice and policy development. Implications for practice and policy development are discussed.","PeriodicalId":507505,"journal":{"name":"Trauma Care","volume":"1598 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139176862","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：