Pub Date : 2024-03-04DOI: 10.3390/receptors3010005
B. Biersack, L. Tahtamouni, Michael Höpfner
The development of potent BRAF inhibitors has revolutionized the treatment of BRAF mutant cancers, in particular, melanomas. However, BRAF mutant cancers of other entities, e.g., colorectal cancers, display distinctly reduced responses to BRAF inhibitors. In addition, the emergence of cancer resistance to BRAF inhibitor treatment poses a severe problem. The reactivation of MAPK/ERK signaling was identified as an important mode of BRAF inhibitor resistance. Receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs), which are prominent anticancer drug targets in their own right, play a crucial role in the development of drug resistance to BRAF inhibitors and the reactivation of MAPK/ERK signal transduction, as well as the establishment of bypassing signaling pathways. MAPK reactivation can occur via increased expression of RTKs, altered RTK signaling, and post-translational processes, among others. This review summarizes the influence of pertinent RTKs on BRAF mutant cancers and BRAF inhibitor resistance and outlines possible and proven ways to circumvent BRAF-associated resistance mechanisms.
{"title":"Role and Function of Receptor Tyrosine Kinases in BRAF Mutant Cancers","authors":"B. Biersack, L. Tahtamouni, Michael Höpfner","doi":"10.3390/receptors3010005","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3390/receptors3010005","url":null,"abstract":"The development of potent BRAF inhibitors has revolutionized the treatment of BRAF mutant cancers, in particular, melanomas. However, BRAF mutant cancers of other entities, e.g., colorectal cancers, display distinctly reduced responses to BRAF inhibitors. In addition, the emergence of cancer resistance to BRAF inhibitor treatment poses a severe problem. The reactivation of MAPK/ERK signaling was identified as an important mode of BRAF inhibitor resistance. Receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs), which are prominent anticancer drug targets in their own right, play a crucial role in the development of drug resistance to BRAF inhibitors and the reactivation of MAPK/ERK signal transduction, as well as the establishment of bypassing signaling pathways. MAPK reactivation can occur via increased expression of RTKs, altered RTK signaling, and post-translational processes, among others. This review summarizes the influence of pertinent RTKs on BRAF mutant cancers and BRAF inhibitor resistance and outlines possible and proven ways to circumvent BRAF-associated resistance mechanisms.","PeriodicalId":507548,"journal":{"name":"Receptors","volume":"67 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140265558","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-02-20DOI: 10.3390/receptors3010004
L. Birioukova, Gilles van Luijtelaar, Inna S. Midzyanovskaya
The involvement of the prefrontal cortical dopaminergic system in the psychopathology of epilepsies and comorbid conditions such as autism spectrum disorder (ASD) still needs to be explored. We used autoradiography to study the D1-like (D1DR) and D2-like (D2DR) receptor binding density in the prefrontal cortex of normal Wistar rats and Wistar-derived strains with generalized convulsive and/or non-convulsive epilepsy. WAG/Rij rats served as a model for non-convulsive absence epilepsy, WAG/Rij-AGS as a model of mixed convulsive/non-convulsive form, and KM strain was a model for convulsive epilepsy comorbid with an ASD-like behavioral phenotype. The prefrontal cortex of rats with any epileptic pathology studied demonstrated profound decreases in binding densities to both D1DR and D2DR; the effects were localized in the primary and secondary anterior cingulate cortices, and adjacent regions. The local decreased D1DR and D2DR binding densities were independent of (not correlated with) each other. The particular group of epileptic rats with an ASD-like phenotype (KM strain) displayed changes in the lateral prefrontal cortex: D1DR were lowered, whereas D2DR were elevated, in the dysgranular insular cortex and adjacent regions. Thus, epilepsy-related changes in the dopaminergic system of the rat archeocortex were localized in the medial prefrontal regions, whereas ASD-related changes were seen in the lateral prefrontal aspects. The findings point to putative local dopaminergic dysfunctions, associated with generalized epilepsies and/or ASD.
{"title":"D1-Like and D2-Like Dopamine Receptors in the Rat Prefrontal Cortex: Impacts of Genetic Generalized Epilepsies and Social Behavioral Deficits","authors":"L. Birioukova, Gilles van Luijtelaar, Inna S. Midzyanovskaya","doi":"10.3390/receptors3010004","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3390/receptors3010004","url":null,"abstract":"The involvement of the prefrontal cortical dopaminergic system in the psychopathology of epilepsies and comorbid conditions such as autism spectrum disorder (ASD) still needs to be explored. We used autoradiography to study the D1-like (D1DR) and D2-like (D2DR) receptor binding density in the prefrontal cortex of normal Wistar rats and Wistar-derived strains with generalized convulsive and/or non-convulsive epilepsy. WAG/Rij rats served as a model for non-convulsive absence epilepsy, WAG/Rij-AGS as a model of mixed convulsive/non-convulsive form, and KM strain was a model for convulsive epilepsy comorbid with an ASD-like behavioral phenotype. The prefrontal cortex of rats with any epileptic pathology studied demonstrated profound decreases in binding densities to both D1DR and D2DR; the effects were localized in the primary and secondary anterior cingulate cortices, and adjacent regions. The local decreased D1DR and D2DR binding densities were independent of (not correlated with) each other. The particular group of epileptic rats with an ASD-like phenotype (KM strain) displayed changes in the lateral prefrontal cortex: D1DR were lowered, whereas D2DR were elevated, in the dysgranular insular cortex and adjacent regions. Thus, epilepsy-related changes in the dopaminergic system of the rat archeocortex were localized in the medial prefrontal regions, whereas ASD-related changes were seen in the lateral prefrontal aspects. The findings point to putative local dopaminergic dysfunctions, associated with generalized epilepsies and/or ASD.","PeriodicalId":507548,"journal":{"name":"Receptors","volume":"58 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140446581","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-02-05DOI: 10.3390/receptors3010003
Anthony P. H. Wright
Almost exactly 35 years after starting to work with the human glucocorticoid receptor (hGR), it is interesting for me to re-evaluate the data and results obtained in the 1980s–1990s with the benefit of current knowledge. What was understood then and how can modern perspectives increase that understanding? The hGR’s tau1c activation domain that we delineated was an enigmatic protein domain. It was apparently devoid of secondary and tertiary protein structures but nonetheless maintained gene activation activity in the absence of other hGR domains, not only in human cells but also in yeast, which is evolutionarily very divergent from humans and which does not contain hGR or other nuclear receptors. We now know that the basic machinery of cells is much more conserved across evolution than was previously thought, so the hGR’s tau1c domain was able to utilise transcription machinery components that were conserved between humans and yeast. Further, we can now see that structure–function aspects of the tau1c domain conform to a general mechanistic framework, such as the acidic exposure model, that has been proposed for many activation domains. As for many transcription factor activation domains, it is now clear that tau1c activity requires regions of transient secondary structure. We now know that there is a tendency for positive Darwinian selection to target intrinsically disordered protein domains. It will be interesting to study the distribution and nature of the many single nucleotide variants of the hGR in this respect.
{"title":"The Glucocorticoid Receptor’s tau1c Activation Domain 35 Years on—Making Order out of Disorder","authors":"Anthony P. H. Wright","doi":"10.3390/receptors3010003","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3390/receptors3010003","url":null,"abstract":"Almost exactly 35 years after starting to work with the human glucocorticoid receptor (hGR), it is interesting for me to re-evaluate the data and results obtained in the 1980s–1990s with the benefit of current knowledge. What was understood then and how can modern perspectives increase that understanding? The hGR’s tau1c activation domain that we delineated was an enigmatic protein domain. It was apparently devoid of secondary and tertiary protein structures but nonetheless maintained gene activation activity in the absence of other hGR domains, not only in human cells but also in yeast, which is evolutionarily very divergent from humans and which does not contain hGR or other nuclear receptors. We now know that the basic machinery of cells is much more conserved across evolution than was previously thought, so the hGR’s tau1c domain was able to utilise transcription machinery components that were conserved between humans and yeast. Further, we can now see that structure–function aspects of the tau1c domain conform to a general mechanistic framework, such as the acidic exposure model, that has been proposed for many activation domains. As for many transcription factor activation domains, it is now clear that tau1c activity requires regions of transient secondary structure. We now know that there is a tendency for positive Darwinian selection to target intrinsically disordered protein domains. It will be interesting to study the distribution and nature of the many single nucleotide variants of the hGR in this respect.","PeriodicalId":507548,"journal":{"name":"Receptors","volume":"1 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139864159","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-02-05DOI: 10.3390/receptors3010003
Anthony P. H. Wright
Almost exactly 35 years after starting to work with the human glucocorticoid receptor (hGR), it is interesting for me to re-evaluate the data and results obtained in the 1980s–1990s with the benefit of current knowledge. What was understood then and how can modern perspectives increase that understanding? The hGR’s tau1c activation domain that we delineated was an enigmatic protein domain. It was apparently devoid of secondary and tertiary protein structures but nonetheless maintained gene activation activity in the absence of other hGR domains, not only in human cells but also in yeast, which is evolutionarily very divergent from humans and which does not contain hGR or other nuclear receptors. We now know that the basic machinery of cells is much more conserved across evolution than was previously thought, so the hGR’s tau1c domain was able to utilise transcription machinery components that were conserved between humans and yeast. Further, we can now see that structure–function aspects of the tau1c domain conform to a general mechanistic framework, such as the acidic exposure model, that has been proposed for many activation domains. As for many transcription factor activation domains, it is now clear that tau1c activity requires regions of transient secondary structure. We now know that there is a tendency for positive Darwinian selection to target intrinsically disordered protein domains. It will be interesting to study the distribution and nature of the many single nucleotide variants of the hGR in this respect.
{"title":"The Glucocorticoid Receptor’s tau1c Activation Domain 35 Years on—Making Order out of Disorder","authors":"Anthony P. H. Wright","doi":"10.3390/receptors3010003","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3390/receptors3010003","url":null,"abstract":"Almost exactly 35 years after starting to work with the human glucocorticoid receptor (hGR), it is interesting for me to re-evaluate the data and results obtained in the 1980s–1990s with the benefit of current knowledge. What was understood then and how can modern perspectives increase that understanding? The hGR’s tau1c activation domain that we delineated was an enigmatic protein domain. It was apparently devoid of secondary and tertiary protein structures but nonetheless maintained gene activation activity in the absence of other hGR domains, not only in human cells but also in yeast, which is evolutionarily very divergent from humans and which does not contain hGR or other nuclear receptors. We now know that the basic machinery of cells is much more conserved across evolution than was previously thought, so the hGR’s tau1c domain was able to utilise transcription machinery components that were conserved between humans and yeast. Further, we can now see that structure–function aspects of the tau1c domain conform to a general mechanistic framework, such as the acidic exposure model, that has been proposed for many activation domains. As for many transcription factor activation domains, it is now clear that tau1c activity requires regions of transient secondary structure. We now know that there is a tendency for positive Darwinian selection to target intrinsically disordered protein domains. It will be interesting to study the distribution and nature of the many single nucleotide variants of the hGR in this respect.","PeriodicalId":507548,"journal":{"name":"Receptors","volume":"36 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139804337","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-01-25DOI: 10.3390/receptors3010002
Jean A. Boutin, Jérôme Leprince
That signaling bias is a nth level of complexity in the understanding of G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) activation is a first fact. That its exhaustive description, including the mode d’emploi of its quantitative measurement, remains a challenge is a second fact. That the use of this concept is promising for the design of drug candidates is a third fact. That the translation of signaling biases observed into in vivo specific effects is well documented is a fourth fact. However, the road to apply those aspects of receptology to a systematic description of a ligand and, a fortiori, of a drug candidate, still necessitates a huge body of studies. In the present commentary, the merits of the molecular description of receptor bias signaling are highlighted and the ligand induced-fit impact on GPCR structure, as well as on the functional repertoire of GPCRs, is discussed. An emphasis is given to the practical aspects during drug design, and, thus, the practical limitations of the current approaches, particularly in the context of as soon as the data are transferred to more integrated/living systems, might be a major limitation.
信号偏差是了解 G 蛋白偶联受体（GPCR）活化的第 n 个复杂层次，这是第一个事实。第二个事实是，对信号偏差的详尽描述，包括其定量测量方法，仍然是一个挑战。第三个事实是，利用这一概念设计候选药物大有可为。第四个事实是，将所观察到的信号传导偏差转化为体内特异效应已得到充分证实。然而，要将受体学的这些方面应用于配体的系统描述，更确切地说，应用于候选药物的系统描述，仍然需要大量的研究。本评论强调了分子描述受体偏置信号的优点，并讨论了配体诱导拟合对 GPCR 结构以及 GPCR 功能谱系的影响。重点强调了药物设计过程中的实际问题，因此，当前方法的实际局限性，尤其是在将数据传输到更综合/活体系统的情况下，可能是一个主要的限制因素。
{"title":"Biased Agonism or “Biaism” for Dummies: A Commentary","authors":"Jean A. Boutin, Jérôme Leprince","doi":"10.3390/receptors3010002","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3390/receptors3010002","url":null,"abstract":"That signaling bias is a nth level of complexity in the understanding of G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) activation is a first fact. That its exhaustive description, including the mode d’emploi of its quantitative measurement, remains a challenge is a second fact. That the use of this concept is promising for the design of drug candidates is a third fact. That the translation of signaling biases observed into in vivo specific effects is well documented is a fourth fact. However, the road to apply those aspects of receptology to a systematic description of a ligand and, a fortiori, of a drug candidate, still necessitates a huge body of studies. In the present commentary, the merits of the molecular description of receptor bias signaling are highlighted and the ligand induced-fit impact on GPCR structure, as well as on the functional repertoire of GPCRs, is discussed. An emphasis is given to the practical aspects during drug design, and, thus, the practical limitations of the current approaches, particularly in the context of as soon as the data are transferred to more integrated/living systems, might be a major limitation.","PeriodicalId":507548,"journal":{"name":"Receptors","volume":"108 11","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-01-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139596766","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-01-04DOI: 10.3390/receptors3010001
E. Vázquez-Gómez, Andy Hernández-Abrego, Jassiel Mejía-Piedras, Jesús García-Colunga
Major depression is related to dysfunction of the GABAergic pathway. Interestingly, the antidepressant fluoxetine modifies GABAergic neurotransmission in human and animal models of depression. However, the effects of norfluoxetine (the main metabolite of fluoxetine) on GABAergic neurotransmission have not yet been studied. Therefore, we explored whether fluoxetine and/or norfluoxetine may regulate GABAergic transmission and whether these substances interact with GABAA receptors in hippocampal CA1 stratum radiatum interneurons. For these purposes, we recorded the firing profile, GABAergic spontaneous inhibitory postsynaptic currents (sIPSCs), and currents induced by GABA puffs in stratum radiatum interneurons using both whole-cell current- and voltage-clamp techniques. Interneurons were selected according with their high firing profile. We found that both fluoxetine and norfluoxetine (at 20 µM) significantly decreased the frequency of sIPSCs without modifying their amplitude and decreased the amplitude of GABA-induced currents. These results indicate that fluoxetine and norfluoxetine decrease GABA release from neurons contacting stratum radiatum interneurons and negatively modulate GABAA receptors in these interneurons, resulting in their disinhibition, which in turn may contribute to increasing the inhibition of hippocampal CA1 pyramidal neurons.
{"title":"Regulation of Hippocampal GABAergic Transmission by Fluoxetine and Its Metabolite Norfluoxetine","authors":"E. Vázquez-Gómez, Andy Hernández-Abrego, Jassiel Mejía-Piedras, Jesús García-Colunga","doi":"10.3390/receptors3010001","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3390/receptors3010001","url":null,"abstract":"Major depression is related to dysfunction of the GABAergic pathway. Interestingly, the antidepressant fluoxetine modifies GABAergic neurotransmission in human and animal models of depression. However, the effects of norfluoxetine (the main metabolite of fluoxetine) on GABAergic neurotransmission have not yet been studied. Therefore, we explored whether fluoxetine and/or norfluoxetine may regulate GABAergic transmission and whether these substances interact with GABAA receptors in hippocampal CA1 stratum radiatum interneurons. For these purposes, we recorded the firing profile, GABAergic spontaneous inhibitory postsynaptic currents (sIPSCs), and currents induced by GABA puffs in stratum radiatum interneurons using both whole-cell current- and voltage-clamp techniques. Interneurons were selected according with their high firing profile. We found that both fluoxetine and norfluoxetine (at 20 µM) significantly decreased the frequency of sIPSCs without modifying their amplitude and decreased the amplitude of GABA-induced currents. These results indicate that fluoxetine and norfluoxetine decrease GABA release from neurons contacting stratum radiatum interneurons and negatively modulate GABAA receptors in these interneurons, resulting in their disinhibition, which in turn may contribute to increasing the inhibition of hippocampal CA1 pyramidal neurons.","PeriodicalId":507548,"journal":{"name":"Receptors","volume":"58 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-01-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139386663","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-12-18DOI: 10.3390/receptors2040018
Sarah Aldhafiri, Mariam Marai, M. Ismaiel, Brenda Murphy, Hugh E. Giffney, Thomas J. Hall, Evelyn P. Murphy, E. Cummins, D. Crean
Orphan nuclear receptor subfamily 4A (NR4A) are key regulators of inflammatory responses, largely by their interactions with NF-κB. Over the last decade, several NR4A modulators have been developed, and they are showing potential as therapeutics, although their widespread use in laboratory settings is limited. Here, we have examined, using myeloid cell line THP-1, whether the NR4A modulator 3-[(4-Chlorophenyl)-(1H-indol-3-yl)methyl]-1H-indole (C-DIM12) can alter the inflammatory outcome of six inflammatory ligands: lipopolysaccharide (LPS), tumour necrosis factor alpha (TNFα), interleukin-1 beta (IL-1β), flagellin (FL), lipoteichoic acid (LTA), and zymosan (ZY). We demonstrate that C-DIM12 (10 µM) selectively alters the secretion of inflammatory chemokine MCP-1 following exposure to distinct inflammatory ligands in a concentration-dependent manner. Furthermore, data obtained from THP-1 Lucia cell experiments show that 10 µM C-DIM12, and not 1 µM C-DIM12, can significantly attenuate the increased NF-κB transcriptional activity observed following the exposure to several inflammatory ligands (LPS, FL, TNFα, LTA, and ZY). Lastly, experimental analysis confirms that the cellular action(s) of C-DIM12 is independent of changes in metabolic parameters. Thus, these data contribute to the understanding of how the NR4A modulator C-DIM12 alters inflammatory responses in a myeloid cell following exposure to multiple ligands.
{"title":"The NR4A Orphan Receptor Modulator C-DIM12 Selectively Alters Inflammatory Mediators in Myeloid Cells","authors":"Sarah Aldhafiri, Mariam Marai, M. Ismaiel, Brenda Murphy, Hugh E. Giffney, Thomas J. Hall, Evelyn P. Murphy, E. Cummins, D. Crean","doi":"10.3390/receptors2040018","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3390/receptors2040018","url":null,"abstract":"Orphan nuclear receptor subfamily 4A (NR4A) are key regulators of inflammatory responses, largely by their interactions with NF-κB. Over the last decade, several NR4A modulators have been developed, and they are showing potential as therapeutics, although their widespread use in laboratory settings is limited. Here, we have examined, using myeloid cell line THP-1, whether the NR4A modulator 3-[(4-Chlorophenyl)-(1H-indol-3-yl)methyl]-1H-indole (C-DIM12) can alter the inflammatory outcome of six inflammatory ligands: lipopolysaccharide (LPS), tumour necrosis factor alpha (TNFα), interleukin-1 beta (IL-1β), flagellin (FL), lipoteichoic acid (LTA), and zymosan (ZY). We demonstrate that C-DIM12 (10 µM) selectively alters the secretion of inflammatory chemokine MCP-1 following exposure to distinct inflammatory ligands in a concentration-dependent manner. Furthermore, data obtained from THP-1 Lucia cell experiments show that 10 µM C-DIM12, and not 1 µM C-DIM12, can significantly attenuate the increased NF-κB transcriptional activity observed following the exposure to several inflammatory ligands (LPS, FL, TNFα, LTA, and ZY). Lastly, experimental analysis confirms that the cellular action(s) of C-DIM12 is independent of changes in metabolic parameters. Thus, these data contribute to the understanding of how the NR4A modulator C-DIM12 alters inflammatory responses in a myeloid cell following exposure to multiple ligands.","PeriodicalId":507548,"journal":{"name":"Receptors","volume":"91 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139173685","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：