Pub Date : 2023-04-04DOI: 10.2989/10220119.2023.2183256
Ian McDonald
{"title":"An Ecological Guide to the Bush","authors":"Ian McDonald","doi":"10.2989/10220119.2023.2183256","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2989/10220119.2023.2183256","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":50841,"journal":{"name":"African Journal of Range & Forage Science","volume":"30 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2023-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"90795349","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-03-28DOI: 10.2989/10220119.2023.2183524
Claudia Maciel Ferreira, Márcio Vieira Cunha, M. V. F. dos Santos, A. C. L. de Mello, D. C. dos Santos, Maria da Conceição Silva, J. J. Coêlho
{"title":"Effect of plant spacing and cutting intensity on the morphology andproductivity of forage cactus [Opuntia stricta (Haw.) Haw.]","authors":"Claudia Maciel Ferreira, Márcio Vieira Cunha, M. V. F. dos Santos, A. C. L. de Mello, D. C. dos Santos, Maria da Conceição Silva, J. J. Coêlho","doi":"10.2989/10220119.2023.2183524","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2989/10220119.2023.2183524","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":50841,"journal":{"name":"African Journal of Range & Forage Science","volume":"22 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2023-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"88996978","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-03-09DOI: 10.2989/10220119.2023.2175036
C. L. D. Araújo, Marcelo de Siqueira Pinto, G. F. Oliveira, Jessica Julielle da Silva Rodrigues, Diego de Sousa Cunha, Claudenilde de Jesus Pinheiro Costa, Daniel Anderson de Souza Melo, A. Magalhães, G. D. de Araújo, F. Campos, G. C. Gois
{"title":"Nutritional properties and in vitro gas production in cactus pear (Opuntia stricta) and cassava (Manihot esculenta) shoot silages","authors":"C. L. D. Araújo, Marcelo de Siqueira Pinto, G. F. Oliveira, Jessica Julielle da Silva Rodrigues, Diego de Sousa Cunha, Claudenilde de Jesus Pinheiro Costa, Daniel Anderson de Souza Melo, A. Magalhães, G. D. de Araújo, F. Campos, G. C. Gois","doi":"10.2989/10220119.2023.2175036","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2989/10220119.2023.2175036","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":50841,"journal":{"name":"African Journal of Range & Forage Science","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2023-03-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"76166236","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-03-03DOI: 10.2989/10220119.2022.2144946
D. A. Plata-Reyes, C. G. Martínez-García, O. Hernández-Mendo, C. Arriaga-Jordán
{"title":"Dynamics of tall fescue (Festuca arundinacea) and Kikuyu grass (Cenchrus clandestinus) pastures associated with white clover (Trifolium repens) in small-scale dairy systems in the highlands of central Mexico","authors":"D. A. Plata-Reyes, C. G. Martínez-García, O. Hernández-Mendo, C. Arriaga-Jordán","doi":"10.2989/10220119.2022.2144946","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2989/10220119.2022.2144946","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":50841,"journal":{"name":"African Journal of Range & Forage Science","volume":"69 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2023-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"80265479","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-02-10DOI: 10.2989/10220119.2023.2175035
G. Arena, M. Hoffman, H. van der Merwe, T. O’Connor
The persistent spread of shrublands is a global phenomenon observed across semiarid grassland-shrubland boundaries. Observations in South Africa, however, have detected a contrasting trend of increasing grass cover across the transition between the Nama-Karoo and Grassland Biomes over the last few decades. A west-to-east gradient of increasing mean annual rainfall, and underlying geology, controls the natural transition of Karoo dwarf shrublands to semiarid grasslands. The availability of historical vegetation surveys and landscape photographs, weather, and livestock census records, made it possible to assess the nature, extent, and drivers of vegetation change across this biome transition. Rainfall has been generally higher over the last four decades compared to the years prior to the original surveys. This, together with a reduction in livestock numbers, is the main driver of the westward expansion by ∼100 km of perennial grasses, and a general increase in dwarf shrub and total vegetation cover. Rangeland condition, as indexed by estimates of grazing capacity, has improved significantly. Despite a structural shift towards grassland-dominance, the original species complement has persisted. The rainfall-driven increase in grass fuel loads in the region, however, places these rangelands at risk of becoming altered by increasing fire frequency.
{"title":"Expansion of the Grassland Biome in the eastern Karoo corresponds with changes in rainfall and livestock numbers","authors":"G. Arena, M. Hoffman, H. van der Merwe, T. O’Connor","doi":"10.2989/10220119.2023.2175035","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2989/10220119.2023.2175035","url":null,"abstract":"The persistent spread of shrublands is a global phenomenon observed across semiarid grassland-shrubland boundaries. Observations in South Africa, however, have detected a contrasting trend of increasing grass cover across the transition between the Nama-Karoo and Grassland Biomes over the last few decades. A west-to-east gradient of increasing mean annual rainfall, and underlying geology, controls the natural transition of Karoo dwarf shrublands to semiarid grasslands. The availability of historical vegetation surveys and landscape photographs, weather, and livestock census records, made it possible to assess the nature, extent, and drivers of vegetation change across this biome transition. Rainfall has been generally higher over the last four decades compared to the years prior to the original surveys. This, together with a reduction in livestock numbers, is the main driver of the westward expansion by ∼100 km of perennial grasses, and a general increase in dwarf shrub and total vegetation cover. Rangeland condition, as indexed by estimates of grazing capacity, has improved significantly. Despite a structural shift towards grassland-dominance, the original species complement has persisted. The rainfall-driven increase in grass fuel loads in the region, however, places these rangelands at risk of becoming altered by increasing fire frequency.","PeriodicalId":50841,"journal":{"name":"African Journal of Range & Forage Science","volume":"34 1","pages":"1 - 19"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2023-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"80124386","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-02-10DOI: 10.2989/10220119.2022.2155247
M. Scholtz, F. Jordaan, N. Thuli Chabalala, G. Pyoos, M. Joel Mamabolo, Frederick WC Neser
There is a general perception that ruminants produce large quantities of greenhouse gases (GHG) which contribute to global warming. Ruminant production is also known as the world’s largest user of land, and southern Africa is no exception. Recent estimates indicate that livestock are responsible for approximately 4% of the world’s GHG emissions through methane production, compared with an initial estimate of 18% by the FAO. Estimates indicate that the total GHG emissions directly related to livestock production in southern Africa did not increase over a period of 20 years, whereas the intensity of livestock–production-related GHG emissions (per kg animal product) was reduced by 40%. This may be the result of increased livestock productivity and breed selection. For instance, increases in the productivity of four indigenous beef cattle breeds decreased the calculated carbon footprint by 7–12%. Recent studies indicated that the methane intensity between beef breeds in South Africa can differ by 44%, and that crossbreeding can have small to moderate effects on the carbon footprint of weaner calf production. Interventions such as the use of indigenous and adapted genotypes, alternative breeding objectives, alternative production systems as well as sustainable management will be key to environmentally friendly livestock production.
{"title":"A balanced perspective on the contribution of extensive ruminant production to greenhouse gas emissions in southern Africa","authors":"M. Scholtz, F. Jordaan, N. Thuli Chabalala, G. Pyoos, M. Joel Mamabolo, Frederick WC Neser","doi":"10.2989/10220119.2022.2155247","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2989/10220119.2022.2155247","url":null,"abstract":"There is a general perception that ruminants produce large quantities of greenhouse gases (GHG) which contribute to global warming. Ruminant production is also known as the world’s largest user of land, and southern Africa is no exception. Recent estimates indicate that livestock are responsible for approximately 4% of the world’s GHG emissions through methane production, compared with an initial estimate of 18% by the FAO. Estimates indicate that the total GHG emissions directly related to livestock production in southern Africa did not increase over a period of 20 years, whereas the intensity of livestock–production-related GHG emissions (per kg animal product) was reduced by 40%. This may be the result of increased livestock productivity and breed selection. For instance, increases in the productivity of four indigenous beef cattle breeds decreased the calculated carbon footprint by 7–12%. Recent studies indicated that the methane intensity between beef breeds in South Africa can differ by 44%, and that crossbreeding can have small to moderate effects on the carbon footprint of weaner calf production. Interventions such as the use of indigenous and adapted genotypes, alternative breeding objectives, alternative production systems as well as sustainable management will be key to environmentally friendly livestock production.","PeriodicalId":50841,"journal":{"name":"African Journal of Range & Forage Science","volume":"28 1","pages":"107 - 113"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2023-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"82039671","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-02-10DOI: 10.2989/10220119.2023.2171127
ND Anane, R. Ayizanga, F. Sarkwa, T. Ansah, E. Timpong-Jones
To improve ruminant livestock production, evaluation of rangelands must be a routine. Rangeland evaluation gives information about the vegetation structure, biomass yield and quality. The Guinea savannah rangelands of Ghana lack research that characterises the spatial variability of herbage yield and quality. It was hypothesised that there is spatial heterogeneity in herbage yield, grazing capacity and plant diversity in the Guinea savannah rangelands of Ghana. The objective was to evaluate the spatial structure of herbage production and grazing capacity in the Guinea savannah rangelands of Ghana for sustainable livestock production. Data were collected from 105 sampling sites and integrated into geo-statistics, using ordinary kriging interpolation to generate herbage yield and grazing capacity estimates. Herbage yield and grazing capacity ranged from 0.63 t ha−1 to 13.43 t ha−1 and 0.18 LU ha−1 to 3.79 LU ha−1 respectively. The root mean square error and the average standard error values were close (2.38 and 2.51 respectively for herbage yield and 0.67 and 0.71 respectively for grazing capacity). Species diversity using the Shannon’s index ranged from 1.13 to 2.40. There was spatial heterogeneity in herbage yield, grazing capacity and species diversity in Ghana’s Guinea savannah rangelands with some parts needing effective site-specific improvement strategies for sustainable livestock production.
为了提高反刍家畜的生产,对牧场的评价必须成为一项常规工作。牧场评价提供了有关植被结构、生物量产量和质量的信息。加纳的几内亚稀树草原缺乏对牧草产量和质量的空间变异性特征的研究。假设加纳几内亚稀树草原牧草产量、放牧能力和植物多样性存在空间异质性。目的是评估加纳几内亚大草原牧草生产的空间结构和放牧能力,以促进可持续畜牧业生产。从105个采样点收集数据,并将其整合到地质统计学中,利用普通克里格插值法估算牧草产量和放牧能力。牧草产量和放牧能力分别为0.63 ~ 13.43 t ha - 1和0.18 ~ 3.79 LU ha - 1。牧草产量的均方根误差和平均标准误差接近,放牧量的均方根误差分别为2.38和2.51,放牧量的均方根误差分别为0.67和0.71。Shannon’s物种多样性指数为1.13 ~ 2.40。加纳-几内亚热带稀树草原牧草产量、放牧能力和物种多样性存在空间异质性,部分地区需要采取有效的因地制宜的改良策略来实现畜牧业的可持续生产。
{"title":"Spatial variability of herbage yield, grazing capacity and plant diversity in a tropical savannah rangeland ecosystem","authors":"ND Anane, R. Ayizanga, F. Sarkwa, T. Ansah, E. Timpong-Jones","doi":"10.2989/10220119.2023.2171127","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2989/10220119.2023.2171127","url":null,"abstract":"To improve ruminant livestock production, evaluation of rangelands must be a routine. Rangeland evaluation gives information about the vegetation structure, biomass yield and quality. The Guinea savannah rangelands of Ghana lack research that characterises the spatial variability of herbage yield and quality. It was hypothesised that there is spatial heterogeneity in herbage yield, grazing capacity and plant diversity in the Guinea savannah rangelands of Ghana. The objective was to evaluate the spatial structure of herbage production and grazing capacity in the Guinea savannah rangelands of Ghana for sustainable livestock production. Data were collected from 105 sampling sites and integrated into geo-statistics, using ordinary kriging interpolation to generate herbage yield and grazing capacity estimates. Herbage yield and grazing capacity ranged from 0.63 t ha−1 to 13.43 t ha−1 and 0.18 LU ha−1 to 3.79 LU ha−1 respectively. The root mean square error and the average standard error values were close (2.38 and 2.51 respectively for herbage yield and 0.67 and 0.71 respectively for grazing capacity). Species diversity using the Shannon’s index ranged from 1.13 to 2.40. There was spatial heterogeneity in herbage yield, grazing capacity and species diversity in Ghana’s Guinea savannah rangelands with some parts needing effective site-specific improvement strategies for sustainable livestock production.","PeriodicalId":50841,"journal":{"name":"African Journal of Range & Forage Science","volume":"6 1","pages":"71 - 84"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2023-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"87188089","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-02-10DOI: 10.2989/10220119.2023.2182070
M. I. Samuels, A. Egeru, P. Mugabe
iii Eighty-five years ago, Africa was described as a land of promise because it provided an immense opportunity for maximum return in the minimum time (Olaniyan 2000). It was treated this way because it was considered more for its deposits of natural wealth and less for its potential for settlement or as a destination market for goods and services produced in Europe and elsewhere (Le Clair 1937). For over 50 years, this narrative held ground but in the last 20 years, perception has shifted with Africa becoming a destination market and a growth opportunity creator, whilst holding ground as a resource provider (Sy 2016). These externally driven perceptions are shifting how key natural resources on the continent are viewed, used and managed. Accordingly, contestations are emerging especially around the environmental–demographic realities. This is because of the emphasis currently placed on continuous economic growth requiring more resource inputs. This will ultimately lead to increased natural resources conflict (Abbink 2018). The exploitative narrative over Africa had become pervasive with respect to the categorisation and valuation of its natural resources. Accordingly, despite covering 43% of the continent’s land surface, rangelands have been subjected to a relatively negative narrative being described as undeveloped areas (Kratli 2010), and centers of degradation, erosion, desertification, droughts, famine and conflict (Martínez-Valderrama and Ibáñez 2023; Twinomuhangi et al. 2023). Such negative narratives influenced the kinds of intervention in rangelands, confining these large swaths of land to conservation areas such as national parks and game reserves (Jones 2006; Cavanagh et al. 2020), constraining livestock to species such as goats (Doro 2023), and expropriating lands from the Indigenous Peoples (Homewood et al. 2009; Guyo 2017). However, more recently, ecologists and economists have revisited the place of rangelands in the continent to provide alternative perspectives on the importance of these natural resources (Vetter 2013). Current evidence counteracts previous notions that African rangelands and pastoralism are unproductive and mismanaged systems (Liniger and Studer 2019). The contribution of rangelands to the livelihoods of African people is considerable and diverse. Most of the continent’s livestock providing diverse products including meat and milk produced from the rangelands (Holechek et al. 2017). Additionally, rangelands are increasingly recognised for their diverse role in the provision of ecosystem services (Ruvuga et al. 2019; Gatwaza and Wang 2023), including carbon sequestration (Denboba 2022) and other valuable provisions. As the population in Africa has grown rapidly over the last three decades and is projected to reach 2.5 billion people by 2050, food demand has also grown and will continue to rise (Dorin 2017). Rangelands have often been the frontiers for agricultural expansion and urban development, and land use conv
iii 85年前,非洲被描述为希望之地,因为它提供了在最短时间内获得最大回报的巨大机会(Olaniyan 2000年)。它之所以被这样对待,是因为它被认为更多的是自然财富的储备,而不是作为欧洲和其他地方生产的商品和服务的定居或目的地市场的潜力(Le Clair 1937)。50多年来,这种说法一直站住脚,但在过去的20年里,随着非洲成为目的地市场和增长机会创造者,同时作为资源提供者站稳脚跟,人们的看法发生了变化(Sy 2016)。这些外部驱动的观念正在改变人们看待、使用和管理非洲大陆关键自然资源的方式。因此,特别是围绕环境-人口现实的争论正在出现。这是因为目前强调持续的经济增长需要更多的资源投入。这最终将导致自然资源冲突的增加(Abbink 2018)。在对非洲的自然资源进行分类和估价方面,关于非洲的剥削叙述已变得普遍。因此,尽管牧场覆盖了非洲大陆43%的陆地表面,但它们一直受到相对负面的描述,被描述为不发达地区(Kratli 2010),以及退化、侵蚀、荒漠化、干旱、饥荒和冲突的中心(Martínez-Valderrama和Ibáñez 2023;Twinomuhangi et al. 2023)。这种负面的叙述影响了对牧场的各种干预,将这些大片土地限制在国家公园和野生动物保护区等保护区(Jones 2006;Cavanagh et al. 2020),将牲畜限制为山羊等物种(Doro 2023),并从土著人民手中征用土地(Homewood et al. 2009;Guyo 2017)。然而,最近,生态学家和经济学家重新审视了非洲大陆牧场的位置,为这些自然资源的重要性提供了另一种观点(Vetter 2013)。目前的证据反驳了之前的观点,即非洲牧场和畜牧业是非生产性和管理不善的系统(Liniger和Studer 2019)。牧场对非洲人民生计的贡献是巨大而多样的。非洲大陆的大多数牲畜提供多种产品,包括牧场生产的肉类和牛奶(Holechek等人,2017)。此外,牧场在提供生态系统服务方面的多样化作用日益得到认可(Ruvuga等人,2019;Gatwaza和Wang 2023),包括碳固存(Denboba 2022)和其他有价值的规定。由于非洲人口在过去三十年中迅速增长,预计到2050年将达到25亿人,粮食需求也在增长,并将继续上升(Dorin 2017)。牧场往往是农业扩张和城市发展的前沿,现有牧场的土地利用转换压力更大,往往人口密度高(Schlecht et al. 2020)。这种土地利用变化模式导致以畜牧业为中心的传统牧场缺乏灵活性,并限制了牲畜的流动性(Feldt et al. 2020)。由于这些压力,土地所有权和土地使用政策,包括土地私有化(Godde et al. 2020)、定居化和转换为其他土地用途,在牧场变得越来越普遍(Byakagaba et al. 2018)。这些变化正在重新调整居住在许多非洲牧场地区的人们的生计。通过贸易和投资增加全球联系,改善了基础设施,增加了以前偏远牧场的可达性,从而促进了牧场居民传统领土的大规模转变(Lind et al. 2020)。随着全球日益认识到正在重塑全球牧场和生物多样性的重大动态,蒙古政府于2019年提议联合国宣布2026年为“国际牧场和牧民年”。该提案随后得到联合国粮食及农业组织(粮农组织)的认可,并于2022年3月15日获得联合国大会的批准。庆祝IYRP的目的是提高全球范围内牧场和牧民社会的形象,并加强对它们在地方、国家和全球层面上对经济、环境、社会和文化的宝贵贡献的认识。在全球IYRP联盟下,非洲研究人员决定出版一期《非洲牧场与饲料科学杂志》特刊,为围绕这个不断变化的大陆的牧场和畜牧业主题的各种专题问题提供证据。 这期由非洲主导的特刊提出了新的证据,从区域角度审视正在重塑非洲大陆牧场的认知、评估、开发和管理的动态。
{"title":"African Rangelands and Pastoralism in a changing continent: Perspectives and Opportunities","authors":"M. I. Samuels, A. Egeru, P. Mugabe","doi":"10.2989/10220119.2023.2182070","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2989/10220119.2023.2182070","url":null,"abstract":"iii Eighty-five years ago, Africa was described as a land of promise because it provided an immense opportunity for maximum return in the minimum time (Olaniyan 2000). It was treated this way because it was considered more for its deposits of natural wealth and less for its potential for settlement or as a destination market for goods and services produced in Europe and elsewhere (Le Clair 1937). For over 50 years, this narrative held ground but in the last 20 years, perception has shifted with Africa becoming a destination market and a growth opportunity creator, whilst holding ground as a resource provider (Sy 2016). These externally driven perceptions are shifting how key natural resources on the continent are viewed, used and managed. Accordingly, contestations are emerging especially around the environmental–demographic realities. This is because of the emphasis currently placed on continuous economic growth requiring more resource inputs. This will ultimately lead to increased natural resources conflict (Abbink 2018). The exploitative narrative over Africa had become pervasive with respect to the categorisation and valuation of its natural resources. Accordingly, despite covering 43% of the continent’s land surface, rangelands have been subjected to a relatively negative narrative being described as undeveloped areas (Kratli 2010), and centers of degradation, erosion, desertification, droughts, famine and conflict (Martínez-Valderrama and Ibáñez 2023; Twinomuhangi et al. 2023). Such negative narratives influenced the kinds of intervention in rangelands, confining these large swaths of land to conservation areas such as national parks and game reserves (Jones 2006; Cavanagh et al. 2020), constraining livestock to species such as goats (Doro 2023), and expropriating lands from the Indigenous Peoples (Homewood et al. 2009; Guyo 2017). However, more recently, ecologists and economists have revisited the place of rangelands in the continent to provide alternative perspectives on the importance of these natural resources (Vetter 2013). Current evidence counteracts previous notions that African rangelands and pastoralism are unproductive and mismanaged systems (Liniger and Studer 2019). The contribution of rangelands to the livelihoods of African people is considerable and diverse. Most of the continent’s livestock providing diverse products including meat and milk produced from the rangelands (Holechek et al. 2017). Additionally, rangelands are increasingly recognised for their diverse role in the provision of ecosystem services (Ruvuga et al. 2019; Gatwaza and Wang 2023), including carbon sequestration (Denboba 2022) and other valuable provisions. As the population in Africa has grown rapidly over the last three decades and is projected to reach 2.5 billion people by 2050, food demand has also grown and will continue to rise (Dorin 2017). Rangelands have often been the frontiers for agricultural expansion and urban development, and land use conv","PeriodicalId":50841,"journal":{"name":"African Journal of Range & Forage Science","volume":"61 1","pages":"iii - vi"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2023-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"91283617","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-02-10DOI: 10.2989/10220119.2022.2138972
D. M. Mwamidi, A. Nunow, Pablo Domínguez
Rural commons in East-Africa have historically played key socio-economic and environmental sustainability. Despite growing interest in this arena, there are still surprisingly few studies that examine rural customary management of pastoral communities in East Africa. This is striking given that this region is an exemplary area for pastoralism and thus ideal for communal systems such as commons. Deficient studies and political support in this area could be linked to widespread prejudice of branding pastoralism as perilous to the environment. We set out to conduct a study to examine and test pastoralists’ customary norms that underpin environmental sustainability/unsustainabity of pastoral commons focusing on Mwanda-Marungu, in Taita hills, Kenya where the first author originates and brought up as a pastoralist up to the age of 24. Through ethnographic approaches and semi-open interviews to 193 respondents conducted in 2019–2021 during water and pasture stress during the dry months of July–October, we examined whether customary governance of Mwanda-Marungu would offer sustainable model that conforms to the IUCN’s Other Effective Area-Based Conservation Measures (OECMs). Our study showed that pastoral communities in this area have been developing inventive measures for generations that improve good management and ecological protection. These may be tied to the principles of OECMs which contests the misconception about pastoralism.
{"title":"Customary ecological conservation of Mwanda-Marungu Pastoral Commons in Taita Hills, south-west Kenya","authors":"D. M. Mwamidi, A. Nunow, Pablo Domínguez","doi":"10.2989/10220119.2022.2138972","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2989/10220119.2022.2138972","url":null,"abstract":"Rural commons in East-Africa have historically played key socio-economic and environmental sustainability. Despite growing interest in this arena, there are still surprisingly few studies that examine rural customary management of pastoral communities in East Africa. This is striking given that this region is an exemplary area for pastoralism and thus ideal for communal systems such as commons. Deficient studies and political support in this area could be linked to widespread prejudice of branding pastoralism as perilous to the environment. We set out to conduct a study to examine and test pastoralists’ customary norms that underpin environmental sustainability/unsustainabity of pastoral commons focusing on Mwanda-Marungu, in Taita hills, Kenya where the first author originates and brought up as a pastoralist up to the age of 24. Through ethnographic approaches and semi-open interviews to 193 respondents conducted in 2019–2021 during water and pasture stress during the dry months of July–October, we examined whether customary governance of Mwanda-Marungu would offer sustainable model that conforms to the IUCN’s Other Effective Area-Based Conservation Measures (OECMs). Our study showed that pastoral communities in this area have been developing inventive measures for generations that improve good management and ecological protection. These may be tied to the principles of OECMs which contests the misconception about pastoralism.","PeriodicalId":50841,"journal":{"name":"African Journal of Range & Forage Science","volume":"65 1","pages":"94 - 106"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2023-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"85198846","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-02-10DOI: 10.2989/10220119.2022.2160012
E. Timpong-Jones, I. Samuels, F. O. Sarkwa, K. Oppong-Anane, Ayodele Oluwakemi Majekodumni
The Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS) recognises transhumance pastoralism as a beneficial livestock production system that can contribute to food security together with economic and political stability. Thus, the subregional bloc put together the ECOWAS Protocol on Transhumance and supporting regulations to actualise these benefits. These policies seek to regulate transhumance pastoralism by ensuring that herd movements are along defined migratory corridors among member states. This review assesses the importance of transhumance pastoralism in West Africa, local and cross-border policies, and associated challenges, with emphasis on herder–farmer conflicts. It was realised that the movement of large numbers of livestock into rangelands (1) provides employment for many, and thus improves livelihoods; (2) improves productivity through high milk production and high fertility; (3) reduces moribund and combustible forage materials in the dry season; and (4) enhances seed dispersal, soil fertility and plant diversity on rangelands. This review shows that the ECOWAS cross-border transhumance protocols have led to infrastructural developments in some member states, but the partial enforcement of protocols has led to herder–farmer conflicts. We conclude that transhumance pastoralism and the regulatory policies have several benefits. However, to ensure policy compliance and avoid herder–farmer conflicts, the policies need to be reviewed and discernible gaps eliminated.
{"title":"Transhumance pastoralism in West Africa – its importance, policies and challenges","authors":"E. Timpong-Jones, I. Samuels, F. O. Sarkwa, K. Oppong-Anane, Ayodele Oluwakemi Majekodumni","doi":"10.2989/10220119.2022.2160012","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2989/10220119.2022.2160012","url":null,"abstract":"The Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS) recognises transhumance pastoralism as a beneficial livestock production system that can contribute to food security together with economic and political stability. Thus, the subregional bloc put together the ECOWAS Protocol on Transhumance and supporting regulations to actualise these benefits. These policies seek to regulate transhumance pastoralism by ensuring that herd movements are along defined migratory corridors among member states. This review assesses the importance of transhumance pastoralism in West Africa, local and cross-border policies, and associated challenges, with emphasis on herder–farmer conflicts. It was realised that the movement of large numbers of livestock into rangelands (1) provides employment for many, and thus improves livelihoods; (2) improves productivity through high milk production and high fertility; (3) reduces moribund and combustible forage materials in the dry season; and (4) enhances seed dispersal, soil fertility and plant diversity on rangelands. This review shows that the ECOWAS cross-border transhumance protocols have led to infrastructural developments in some member states, but the partial enforcement of protocols has led to herder–farmer conflicts. We conclude that transhumance pastoralism and the regulatory policies have several benefits. However, to ensure policy compliance and avoid herder–farmer conflicts, the policies need to be reviewed and discernible gaps eliminated.","PeriodicalId":50841,"journal":{"name":"African Journal of Range & Forage Science","volume":"10 1","pages":"114 - 128"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2023-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"85034550","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}