Antonello Bellomo, Mario Altamura, Antonio Ventriglio, Angelo Rella, Roberto Quartesan, Sandro Elisei
Consultation-liaison (C-L) psychiatry has an important role in the identification and management of psychological problems in patients with medical disorders in general hospitals. The diagnostic tools C-L psychiatrists are usually provided with may reveal to be limited because of particular psychosomatic syndromes and subthreshold psychopathology that are undetected by psychiatric diagnostic criteria. The Diagnostic Criteria for Psychosomatic Research (DCPR) were developed with the aim of providing clinicians with operational criteria for psychosomatic syndromes to overcome the limitations shown by the most often diagnosed disorders in medical settings as adjustment, somatoform, mood, and anxiety disorders. In a group of 66 consecutive C-L psychiatry inpatients, a consistent prevalence of 71% DCPR syndromes was found, particularly secondary functional somatic symptoms, persistent somatization, health anxiety, and demoralization. Their overlap rates with DSM-IV diagnoses showed that the DCPR syndromes were able to identify psychological dimensions (as somatic symptom clustering, anxiety triggered by the current health status, and a feeling state of hopelessness) that do not meet or are not detected by DSM-IV. Furthermore, the DCPR syndromes identified patients with clinically significant functional impairment. These results replicate previous findings in C-L psychiatry using the DCPR categories and pave the way for further research to clarify their mediating role in the course and the outcome variance of medical and psychological problems of hospital inpatients referred for psychiatric consultation.
{"title":"Psychological factors affecting medical conditions in consultation-liaison psychiatry.","authors":"Antonello Bellomo, Mario Altamura, Antonio Ventriglio, Angelo Rella, Roberto Quartesan, Sandro Elisei","doi":"10.1159/000106801","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000106801","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Consultation-liaison (C-L) psychiatry has an important role in the identification and management of psychological problems in patients with medical disorders in general hospitals. The diagnostic tools C-L psychiatrists are usually provided with may reveal to be limited because of particular psychosomatic syndromes and subthreshold psychopathology that are undetected by psychiatric diagnostic criteria. The Diagnostic Criteria for Psychosomatic Research (DCPR) were developed with the aim of providing clinicians with operational criteria for psychosomatic syndromes to overcome the limitations shown by the most often diagnosed disorders in medical settings as adjustment, somatoform, mood, and anxiety disorders. In a group of 66 consecutive C-L psychiatry inpatients, a consistent prevalence of 71% DCPR syndromes was found, particularly secondary functional somatic symptoms, persistent somatization, health anxiety, and demoralization. Their overlap rates with DSM-IV diagnoses showed that the DCPR syndromes were able to identify psychological dimensions (as somatic symptom clustering, anxiety triggered by the current health status, and a feeling state of hopelessness) that do not meet or are not detected by DSM-IV. Furthermore, the DCPR syndromes identified patients with clinically significant functional impairment. These results replicate previous findings in C-L psychiatry using the DCPR categories and pave the way for further research to clarify their mediating role in the course and the outcome variance of medical and psychological problems of hospital inpatients referred for psychiatric consultation.</p>","PeriodicalId":50851,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Psychosomatic Medicine","volume":"28 ","pages":"127-140"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2007-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1159/000106801","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"26877742","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Chiara Rafanelli, Renzo Roncuzzi, Fedra Ottolini, Marco Rigatelli
There are substantial data supporting a strong relationship between cardiovascular diseases and psychological conditions. However, the criteria for scientific validation of the entities currently subsumed under the DSM-IV category of 'Psychological factors affecting a medical condition' have never been clearly enumerated and the terms 'psychological symptoms' and 'personality traits' that do not satisfy traditional psychiatric criteria are not well defined; moreover, it is difficult to measure these subtypes of distress and there is always the need for a clinical judgment. In recent years psychosomatic research has focused increasing attention on these clinical and methodological issues. Psychosocial variables that were derived from psychosomatic research were then translated into operational tools, such as Diagnostic Criteria for Psychosomatic Research; among these, demoralization, irritable mood, type A behavior are frequently detected in cardiac patients. The joint use of DSM-IV criteria and Diagnostic Criteria for Psychosomatic Research allow then to identify psychological factors that seem to affect cardiologic condition. There remains the need to further investigate if treating both clinical and subsyndromal psychological conditions can improve quality of life and reduce the risk of morbidity and mortality in these patients.
{"title":"Psychological factors affecting cardiologic conditions.","authors":"Chiara Rafanelli, Renzo Roncuzzi, Fedra Ottolini, Marco Rigatelli","doi":"10.1159/000106798","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000106798","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>There are substantial data supporting a strong relationship between cardiovascular diseases and psychological conditions. However, the criteria for scientific validation of the entities currently subsumed under the DSM-IV category of 'Psychological factors affecting a medical condition' have never been clearly enumerated and the terms 'psychological symptoms' and 'personality traits' that do not satisfy traditional psychiatric criteria are not well defined; moreover, it is difficult to measure these subtypes of distress and there is always the need for a clinical judgment. In recent years psychosomatic research has focused increasing attention on these clinical and methodological issues. Psychosocial variables that were derived from psychosomatic research were then translated into operational tools, such as Diagnostic Criteria for Psychosomatic Research; among these, demoralization, irritable mood, type A behavior are frequently detected in cardiac patients. The joint use of DSM-IV criteria and Diagnostic Criteria for Psychosomatic Research allow then to identify psychological factors that seem to affect cardiologic condition. There remains the need to further investigate if treating both clinical and subsyndromal psychological conditions can improve quality of life and reduce the risk of morbidity and mortality in these patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":50851,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Psychosomatic Medicine","volume":"28 ","pages":"72-108"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2007-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1159/000106798","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"26877740","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Secondo Fassino, Giovanni Abbate Daga, Andrea Pierò, Nadia Delsedime
Eating disorders (EDs) are representative of the relationship between psychosomatic and psychiatric disorders and have complex interactions in the body, mind, and brain. The psychosomatic issues of EDs emerge in the alterations of the body and its functioning, in personality traits, in the difficulty of recognizing and coping with emotions, and in the management of anger and impulsiveness. The Diagnostic Criteria for Psychosomatic Research used by the authors of this chapter (alexithymia, type A behavior, irritable mood, demoralization) represent an innovative instrument with therapeutic implications. When alexithymia is diagnosed, greater efforts will be made to increase the patients' awareness of the emotions underlying disordered eating behaviors. Moreover, in a comprehensive intervention, the diagnosis of demoralization and irritable mood increases the therapist's understanding of the patients' cognitive and relational patterns and suggests the use of an antidepressant. Alexithymia and type A behavior describe more stable traits in relation with the patients' personality. From this viewpoint, psychotherapy may be focused on the identification and expression of feelings, giving particular attention to anger, which is often unrecognized, excessively controlled, and self destructive in patients with EDs. Lastly, the correlation between personality traits assessed with the Temperament and Character Inventory and the Diagnostic Criteria for Psychosomatic Research suggests that the strengthening of character through psychodynamic psychotherapy might be useful also for the psychosomatic cores of the disorder.
{"title":"Psychological factors affecting eating disorders.","authors":"Secondo Fassino, Giovanni Abbate Daga, Andrea Pierò, Nadia Delsedime","doi":"10.1159/000106802","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000106802","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Eating disorders (EDs) are representative of the relationship between psychosomatic and psychiatric disorders and have complex interactions in the body, mind, and brain. The psychosomatic issues of EDs emerge in the alterations of the body and its functioning, in personality traits, in the difficulty of recognizing and coping with emotions, and in the management of anger and impulsiveness. The Diagnostic Criteria for Psychosomatic Research used by the authors of this chapter (alexithymia, type A behavior, irritable mood, demoralization) represent an innovative instrument with therapeutic implications. When alexithymia is diagnosed, greater efforts will be made to increase the patients' awareness of the emotions underlying disordered eating behaviors. Moreover, in a comprehensive intervention, the diagnosis of demoralization and irritable mood increases the therapist's understanding of the patients' cognitive and relational patterns and suggests the use of an antidepressant. Alexithymia and type A behavior describe more stable traits in relation with the patients' personality. From this viewpoint, psychotherapy may be focused on the identification and expression of feelings, giving particular attention to anger, which is often unrecognized, excessively controlled, and self destructive in patients with EDs. Lastly, the correlation between personality traits assessed with the Temperament and Character Inventory and the Diagnostic Criteria for Psychosomatic Research suggests that the strengthening of character through psychodynamic psychotherapy might be useful also for the psychosomatic cores of the disorder.</p>","PeriodicalId":50851,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Psychosomatic Medicine","volume":"28 ","pages":"141-168"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2007-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1159/000106802","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"26877743","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Appendix 2. Interview for the diagnostic criteria for psychosomatic research.","authors":"","doi":"10.1159/000106811","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000106811","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":50851,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Psychosomatic Medicine","volume":"28 ","pages":"174-181"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2007-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1159/000106811","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"26877745","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Stefania Fabbri, Giovanni A Fava, Laura Sirri, Thomas N Wise
The Diagnostic Criteria for Psychosomatic Research (DCPR) are a diagnostic and conceptual framework that was proposed a decade ago by an international group of investigators. The DCPR's rationale was to translate psychosocial variables that derived from psychosomatic research into operational tools whereby individual patients could be identified. A set of 12 syndromes was developed: health anxiety, thanatophobia, disease phobia, illness denial, persistent somatization, conversion symptoms, functional somatic symptoms secondary to a psychiatric disorder, anniversary reaction, demoralization, irritable mood, type A behavior, and alexithymia. These criteria were meant to be used in a multiaxial approach. The aim of this work is to survey the research evidence which has accumulated on the DCPR, to provide specification for their development and validation and to examine the specific DCPR clusters. Their implications for classification purposes (DSM-V) are also discussed.
{"title":"Development of a new assessment strategy in psychosomatic medicine: the diagnostic criteria for psychosomatic research.","authors":"Stefania Fabbri, Giovanni A Fava, Laura Sirri, Thomas N Wise","doi":"10.1159/000106793","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000106793","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The Diagnostic Criteria for Psychosomatic Research (DCPR) are a diagnostic and conceptual framework that was proposed a decade ago by an international group of investigators. The DCPR's rationale was to translate psychosocial variables that derived from psychosomatic research into operational tools whereby individual patients could be identified. A set of 12 syndromes was developed: health anxiety, thanatophobia, disease phobia, illness denial, persistent somatization, conversion symptoms, functional somatic symptoms secondary to a psychiatric disorder, anniversary reaction, demoralization, irritable mood, type A behavior, and alexithymia. These criteria were meant to be used in a multiaxial approach. The aim of this work is to survey the research evidence which has accumulated on the DCPR, to provide specification for their development and validation and to examine the specific DCPR clusters. Their implications for classification purposes (DSM-V) are also discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":50851,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Psychosomatic Medicine","volume":"28 ","pages":"1-20"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2007-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1159/000106793","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"26875645","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Patterns of comorbidity among common mental disorders can be understood from the perspective of a model that regards mood, anxiety and somatization disorders as elements within an internalizing spectrum of disorder, and substance use and antisocial behavior disorders as elements within a separate externalizing spectrum of disorder. In this chapter, we evaluate the possibility of linking this model to literature on chronic pain. Evidence from psychosocial and biological perspectives points towards mechanisms that link chronic pain to internalizing disorders. Such evidence indicates that the internalizing-externalizing model may provide a useful framework for suggesting new directions for research on connections between chronic pain and mood, anxiety, and related disorders and traits.
{"title":"Structural models of comorbidity among common mental disorders: connections to chronic pain.","authors":"R. Krueger, J. Tackett, K. Markon","doi":"10.1159/000095366","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000095366","url":null,"abstract":"Patterns of comorbidity among common mental disorders can be understood from the perspective of a model that regards mood, anxiety and somatization disorders as elements within an internalizing spectrum of disorder, and substance use and antisocial behavior disorders as elements within a separate externalizing spectrum of disorder. In this chapter, we evaluate the possibility of linking this model to literature on chronic pain. Evidence from psychosocial and biological perspectives points towards mechanisms that link chronic pain to internalizing disorders. Such evidence indicates that the internalizing-externalizing model may provide a useful framework for suggesting new directions for research on connections between chronic pain and mood, anxiety, and related disorders and traits.","PeriodicalId":50851,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Psychosomatic Medicine","volume":"25 1","pages":"63-77"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2006-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1159/000095366","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"64350635","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
The neurobiology of pain has had extensive research directed at identifying the mechanisms of nociceptive transmission and integration. Clinical conditions of chronic pain including phantom limb pain cannot be explained without an understanding of the complex mechanisms of pain regulation. An overview of the neurobiological organization of the nociceptive system, from different pain fiber types to subcortical and cortical experiential centers, is presented, along with a brief description of the known cross talk within the system and between pain pathways and those for other information. Finally, interactions between affective, executive, and cognitive processes and pain experiences are described briefly.
{"title":"Neurobiology of pain.","authors":"M. Clark, G. Treisman","doi":"10.1159/000095367","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000095367","url":null,"abstract":"The neurobiology of pain has had extensive research directed at identifying the mechanisms of nociceptive transmission and integration. Clinical conditions of chronic pain including phantom limb pain cannot be explained without an understanding of the complex mechanisms of pain regulation. An overview of the neurobiological organization of the nociceptive system, from different pain fiber types to subcortical and cortical experiential centers, is presented, along with a brief description of the known cross talk within the system and between pain pathways and those for other information. Finally, interactions between affective, executive, and cognitive processes and pain experiences are described briefly.","PeriodicalId":50851,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Psychosomatic Medicine","volume":"25 1","pages":"78-88"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2006-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1159/000095367","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"64350842","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
The health care system is often unsuccessful in the treatment of the patient experiencing chronic pain. Chronic pain is often complicated by a variety of psychiatric conditions that make it difficult to engage and treat patients. This generates frustration and pessimism in the physician. The patient may be afflicted by the syndrome of an affective disorder, demoralized by the unintended circumstances of their life, unable to meet the demands of stressors because of a lack of inherent capacities, or helplessly trapped by poor choices and repeated unproductive actions. The physician's interest and the patient's optimism can be restored and sustained by utilizing a systematic interdisciplinary approach utilizing the four perspectives of diseases, life stories, dimensions, and behaviors to evaluate the patient who is disabled by depression and chronic pain. The design of a comprehensive treatment plan involves the determination of each perspective's contribution to the patient's suffering. The process of formulation recognizes that the perspectives are distinct from one another but complementary in illuminating the various reasons for a patient's suffering. The perspectives offer a recipe for designing a rational treatment plan rather than trying to reduce the individual patient's complexity into a one-dimensional construct. This approach increases the probability of a successful outcome for both patient and physician.
{"title":"Perspectives on pain and depression.","authors":"M. Clark, G. Treisman","doi":"10.1159/000095363","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000095363","url":null,"abstract":"The health care system is often unsuccessful in the treatment of the patient experiencing chronic pain. Chronic pain is often complicated by a variety of psychiatric conditions that make it difficult to engage and treat patients. This generates frustration and pessimism in the physician. The patient may be afflicted by the syndrome of an affective disorder, demoralized by the unintended circumstances of their life, unable to meet the demands of stressors because of a lack of inherent capacities, or helplessly trapped by poor choices and repeated unproductive actions. The physician's interest and the patient's optimism can be restored and sustained by utilizing a systematic interdisciplinary approach utilizing the four perspectives of diseases, life stories, dimensions, and behaviors to evaluate the patient who is disabled by depression and chronic pain. The design of a comprehensive treatment plan involves the determination of each perspective's contribution to the patient's suffering. The process of formulation recognizes that the perspectives are distinct from one another but complementary in illuminating the various reasons for a patient's suffering. The perspectives offer a recipe for designing a rational treatment plan rather than trying to reduce the individual patient's complexity into a one-dimensional construct. This approach increases the probability of a successful outcome for both patient and physician.","PeriodicalId":50851,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Psychosomatic Medicine","volume":"25 1","pages":"1-27"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2006-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1159/000095363","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"64350483","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Evaluating and treating patients with chronic nonmalignant pain, especially with opioid medications, often causes discomfort on the part of primary care physicians. A number of patient-, physician-, and system-related issues converge to make treating chronic pain a complex matter. Patient-related issues include an inability to define a clear anatomic cause for patients' pain, comorbid psychiatric conditions, and past and current substance abuse. Physicians lack training on the appropriate evaluation and treatment of chronic nonmalignant pain, fear creating addicts, and often face intense pharmaceutical industry pressure to prescribe medications. A paucity of practical clinical practice guidelines, controversy over the effectiveness of opioids on chronic nonmalignant pain, and concern about potential legal and regulatory ramifications add to the complexity of caring for these patients. Possible multifaceted solutions exist to minimize provider discomfort and improve their ability to treat patients appropriately. Examples include comprehensive, practical multidimensional guidelines on the evaluation and treatment of chronic nonmalignant pain, Web-based teleconferenced consultations with subspecialists, reduced pharmaceutical pressure, enhanced continuing medical education and pregraduate training, multispecialty coordinated care of patients with adequate reimbursement for such care, and physician access to state-based systems to track opioid prescriptions.
{"title":"Opioid prescribing for chronic nonmalignant pain in primary care: challenges and solutions.","authors":"Y. Olsen, G. Daumit","doi":"10.1159/000095371","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000095371","url":null,"abstract":"Evaluating and treating patients with chronic nonmalignant pain, especially with opioid medications, often causes discomfort on the part of primary care physicians. A number of patient-, physician-, and system-related issues converge to make treating chronic pain a complex matter. Patient-related issues include an inability to define a clear anatomic cause for patients' pain, comorbid psychiatric conditions, and past and current substance abuse. Physicians lack training on the appropriate evaluation and treatment of chronic nonmalignant pain, fear creating addicts, and often face intense pharmaceutical industry pressure to prescribe medications. A paucity of practical clinical practice guidelines, controversy over the effectiveness of opioids on chronic nonmalignant pain, and concern about potential legal and regulatory ramifications add to the complexity of caring for these patients. Possible multifaceted solutions exist to minimize provider discomfort and improve their ability to treat patients appropriately. Examples include comprehensive, practical multidimensional guidelines on the evaluation and treatment of chronic nonmalignant pain, Web-based teleconferenced consultations with subspecialists, reduced pharmaceutical pressure, enhanced continuing medical education and pregraduate training, multispecialty coordinated care of patients with adequate reimbursement for such care, and physician access to state-based systems to track opioid prescriptions.","PeriodicalId":50851,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Psychosomatic Medicine","volume":"53 1","pages":"138-50"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2006-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1159/000095371","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"64351752","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}