Advances in Cancer Research最新文献

RAS proteins represent critical drivers of tumor development and thus are the focus of intense efforts to pharmacologically inhibit these proteins in human cancer. Although recent success has been attained in developing clinically efficacious inhibitors to KRAS^G12C, there remains a critical need for developing approaches to inhibit additional mutant RAS proteins. A number of anti-RAS biologics have been developed which reveal novel and potentially therapeutically targetable vulnerabilities in oncogenic RAS. This review will discuss the growing field of anti-RAS biologics and potential development of these reagents into new anti-RAS therapies.

Chemo-brain refers to the thinking and memory problems that occur in cancer patients during and after chemotherapy. It is also known as cognitive dysfunction or chemo-fog. Risk factors include brain malignancies, either primary or metastatic, radiotherapy and chemotherapy, either systemic or brain targeted. There are various mechanisms by which chemo-brain occurs in patients post-chemotherapy, including inflammation of neurons, stress due to free radical generation, and alterations in normal neuronal cell process due to biochemical changes. While chemotherapy drugs that are non-brain targeted, usually fail to cross the blood-brain barrier (BBB), this is not the case for inflammatory cytokines that are released, which easily cross the BBB. These inflammatory neurotoxic agents may represent the primary mediators of chemobrain and include the pro-inflammatory cytokines such as interleukins 1 and 6 and tumor necrosis factor. The pronounced rise in oxidative stress due to continuous chemotherapy also leads to a reduction in neurogenesis and gliogenesis, loss of spine and dendritic cells, and a reduction in neurotransmitter release. Based on recent research, potential agents to prevent and treat chemo brain have been identified, which include Lithium, Fluoxetine, Metformin, Rolipram, Astaxanthin, and microglial inhibitors. However, more defined animal models for cognitive dysfunction are required to study in detail the mechanisms involved in chemo-brain; furthermore, well-defined clinical trials are required to identify drug targets and their therapeutic significance. With these focused approaches, the future for improved therapies is promising.

The quest of defeating cancer and improving prognosis in survivors has generated remarkable strides forward in research and have advanced the development of new antineoplastic therapies. These achievements, combined with rapid screening and early detection, have considerably extended the life expectancy of patients surviving multiple types of malignancies. Consequently, chemotherapy-related toxicity in several organ systems, especially the cardiovascular system, has surfaced as one of the leading causes of morbidity and mortality among cancer survivors. Recent evidence classifies chemotherapy-induced cardiotoxicity as the second-leading cause of morbidity and mortality, closely comparing with secondary cancer malignancies. While a certain degree of cardiotoxicity has been reported to accompany most chemotherapies, including anthracyclines, anti-metabolites, and alkylating agents, even the latest targeted cancer therapies such as immune checkpoint inhibitors and tyrosine kinase inhibitors have been associated with acute and chronic cardiac sequelae. In this chapter, we focus on describing the principal mechanism(s) for each class of chemotherapeutic agents that lead to cardiotoxicity and the innovative translational research approaches that are currently being explored to prevent or treat cancer therapy-induced cardiotoxicity and related cardiac complications.

It has been estimated that nearly 80% of anticancer drug-treated patients receive potentially nephrotoxic drugs, while the kidneys play a central role in the excretion of anticancer drugs. Nephrotoxicity has long been a serious complication that hampers the effectiveness of cancer treatment and continues to influence both mortality and length of hospitalization among cancer patients exposed to either conventional cytotoxic agents or targeted therapies. Kidney injury arising from anticancer drugs tends to be associated with preexisting comorbidities, advanced cancer stage, and the use of concomitant non-chemotherapeutic nephrotoxic drugs. Despite the prevalence and impact of kidney injury on therapeutic outcomes, the field is sorely lacking in an understanding of the mechanisms driving cancer drug-induced renal pathophysiology, resulting in quite limited and largely ineffective management of anticancer drug-induced nephrotoxicity. Consequently, there is a clear imperative for understanding the basis for nephrotoxic manifestations of anticancer agents for the successful management of kidney injury by these drugs. This article provides an overview of current preclinical research on the nephrotoxicity of cancer treatments and highlights prospective approaches to mitigate cancer therapy-related renal toxicity.

Disruption of the native membrane organization of Ras by the farnesyltransferase inhibitor tipifarnib in the late 1990s constituted the first indirect approach to drug target Ras. Since then, our understanding of how dynamically Ras shuttles between subcellular locations has changed significantly. Ras proteins have to arrive at the plasma membrane for efficient MAPK-signal propagation. On the plasma membrane Ras proteins are organized into isoform specific proteo-lipid assemblies called nanocluster. Recent evidence suggests that Ras nanocluster have a specific lipid composition, which supports the recruitment of effectors such as Raf. Conversely, effectors possess lipid-recognition motifs, which appear to serve as co-incidence detectors for the lipid domain of a given Ras isoform. Evidence suggests that dimeric Raf proteins then co-assemble dimeric Ras in an immobile complex, thus forming the minimal unit of an active nanocluster. Here we review established and novel trafficking chaperones and trafficking factors of Ras, along with the set of lipid and protein modulators of Ras nanoclustering. We highlight drug targeting approaches and opportunities against these determinants of functional Ras membrane organization. Finally, we reflect on implications for Ras signaling in polarized cells, such as epithelia, which are a common origin of tumorigenesis.

Patient-derived organoids (PDOs) established from hepatobiliary cancers are seen as valuable models of the cancer of origin. More precisely, PDOs have the ability to retain the original cancer genetic, epigenetic and phenotypic features. By extension, hepatobiliary cancer PDOs have the potential to (1) increase our understanding of cancer biology; (2) allow high-throughput drug screening for more efficient identification and testing of small molecule therapeutics, and (3) permit the design of personalized drug choice approaches for patients with liver cancer. Here, we review general principles for PDO establishment from hepatocellular carcinoma and cholangiocarcinoma, their utilization in drug screening strategies, and last, the establishment of complex PDOs to include tumor stroma. We conclude that PDOs represent a promising and important development in investigating interaction between liver cancer cell types and their microenvironment, as well as for positioning PDOs for high throughput drug screening for hepatobiliary cancers, and that further work is now needed to fully realize their potential.

In this review, I provide a brief history of the discovery of RAS and the GAPs and GEFs that regulate its activity from a personal perspective. Much of this history has been driven by technological breakthroughs that occurred concurrently, such as molecular cloning, cDNA expression to analyze RAS proteins and their structures, and application of PCR to detect mutations. I discuss the RAS superfamily and RAS proteins as therapeutic targets, including recent advances in developing RAS inhibitors. I also describe the role of the RAS Initiative at Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research in advancing development of RAS inhibitors and providing new insights into signaling complexes and interaction of RAS proteins with the plasma membrane.