首页 > 最新文献

Information Research an international electronic journal最新文献

英文 中文
Libraries in society: comparing international metrics of societal progress to library usage statistics 社会中的图书馆:将社会进步的国际指标与图书馆使用统计数据进行比较
Pub Date : 2023-12-15 DOI: 10.47989/ir284217
Margaret Sullivan
Introduction. Literacy is a major predictor of education, income, and health. Both historically and currently, libraries have been leaders in promoting literacy globally. The objective of this research is to determine if countries with higher metrics related to the Sustainable Development Goals also demonstrate evidence of stronger relationships between library usage and literacy. Method. Using data from the World Bank, UNESCO, the United Nations and the IFLA Map of the World, the author grouped countries several different ways by income levels, the Human Development Index, literacy rate, and the Gender Inequality Index in order to explore the relationship between literacy and library usage in each categorization. Analysis. Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient was used to determine if there is a relationship between the variables. Results. In the grouping of countries by HDI, literacy, progress, GII and income, the correlation coefficients generally increased for each individual library usage statistic as the indicator improved. Conclusion. In groupings of countries with higher metrics of societal health, correlation rates between library usage and literacy increase from country groups with lower rates of those metrics.
导言扫盲是教育、收入和健康的主要预测因素。无论在历史上还是现在,图书馆都是促进全球扫盲的领头羊。本研究旨在确定可持续发展目标相关指标较高的国家是否也有证据表明图书馆的使用与扫盲之间存在更密切的关系。研究方法。作者利用世界银行、联合国教科文组织、联合国和国际图联世界地图中的数据,按照收入水平、人类发展指数、识字率和性别不平等指数对各国进行了不同的分组,以探讨每种分类中识字率和图书馆使用率之间的关系。分析。使用斯皮尔曼等级相关系数来确定变量之间是否存在关系。结果。在按人类发展指数、识字率、进步程度、性别平等指数和收入对国家进行分组时,随着指标的提高,每个单独的图书馆使用统计数据的相关系数普遍上升。结论在社会健康指标较高的国家分组中,图书馆使用率和识字率之间的相关系数比这些指标较低的国家分组要高。
{"title":"Libraries in society: comparing international metrics of societal progress to library usage statistics","authors":"Margaret Sullivan","doi":"10.47989/ir284217","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.47989/ir284217","url":null,"abstract":"Introduction. Literacy is a major predictor of education, income, and health. Both historically and currently, libraries have been leaders in promoting literacy globally. The objective of this research is to determine if countries with higher metrics related to the Sustainable Development Goals also demonstrate evidence of stronger relationships between library usage and literacy. Method. Using data from the World Bank, UNESCO, the United Nations and the IFLA Map of the World, the author grouped countries several different ways by income levels, the Human Development Index, literacy rate, and the Gender Inequality Index in order to explore the relationship between literacy and library usage in each categorization. Analysis. Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient was used to determine if there is a relationship between the variables. Results. In the grouping of countries by HDI, literacy, progress, GII and income, the correlation coefficients generally increased for each individual library usage statistic as the indicator improved. Conclusion. In groupings of countries with higher metrics of societal health, correlation rates between library usage and literacy increase from country groups with lower rates of those metrics.","PeriodicalId":509289,"journal":{"name":"Information Research an international electronic journal","volume":"28 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139177738","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Librarians’ and teachers’ conceptions of multiliteracies in the context of Finnish curriculum reform 芬兰课程改革背景下图书馆员和教师的多元文学观念
Pub Date : 2023-12-15 DOI: 10.47989/ir284506
Siinamari Ylivuori, Anu Ojaranta
Introduction. The aim of this study is to describe how the concept of multiliteracies is interpreted by teachers and librarians. Method. Two qualitative research projects involving teachers’ and librarians’ interviews are combined in this study. Individual and group interviews are analysed to explore the conceptions of teachers and librarians on multiliteracies. Analysis. Interviews are analysed using an inductive approach. Data categorisation is discussed and decided by both authors together. Results. The results indicate that there are differences in conceptualising multiliteracies and in the confidence in defining the concept between teachers and librarians. In addition, the concept of multiliteracies is seen as both a skills set and a pedagogical tool. Conclusions. There is a need for conceptual clarification of multiliteracies both in grassroots-level work and in the curriculum context to avoid multiple interpretations of the concept and to guide how multiliteracies could be pedagogically implemented.
导言。本研究的目的是描述教师和图书馆员如何解释多元文学的概念。研究方法。本研究结合了两个定性研究项目,分别涉及教师和图书馆员的访谈。通过分析个人访谈和小组访谈,探讨教师和图书馆员对多元文 化的概念。分析。采用归纳法对访谈进行分析。数据分类由两位作者共同讨论决定。结果。结果表明,教师和图书馆员对多元文盲概念的理解存在差异,对定义这一概念的信心也不尽相同。此外,多元文 化的概念既被视为一套技能,也被视为一种教学工具。结论。无论是在基层工作中还是在课程设置中,都有必要澄清多文 化的概念,以避免对这一概念的多重解释,并指导如何在教学中实施多文化。
{"title":"Librarians’ and teachers’ conceptions of multiliteracies in the context of Finnish curriculum reform","authors":"Siinamari Ylivuori, Anu Ojaranta","doi":"10.47989/ir284506","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.47989/ir284506","url":null,"abstract":"Introduction. The aim of this study is to describe how the concept of multiliteracies is interpreted by teachers and librarians. Method. Two qualitative research projects involving teachers’ and librarians’ interviews are combined in this study. Individual and group interviews are analysed to explore the conceptions of teachers and librarians on multiliteracies. Analysis. Interviews are analysed using an inductive approach. Data categorisation is discussed and decided by both authors together. Results. The results indicate that there are differences in conceptualising multiliteracies and in the confidence in defining the concept between teachers and librarians. In addition, the concept of multiliteracies is seen as both a skills set and a pedagogical tool. Conclusions. There is a need for conceptual clarification of multiliteracies both in grassroots-level work and in the curriculum context to avoid multiple interpretations of the concept and to guide how multiliteracies could be pedagogically implemented.","PeriodicalId":509289,"journal":{"name":"Information Research an international electronic journal","volume":"59 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139178564","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A bibliometric study of digital humanities research in China from 2012 to 2021 2012 至 2021 年中国数字人文研究文献计量研究
Pub Date : 2023-12-15 DOI: 10.47989/ir284336
Fangli Su, Shihao Li, Qinghua Liu, Yin Zhang
Introduction. We investigated the main research topics of digital humanities in China from 2012 to 2021, as well as the journals, authors, and institutions that produced the most research in this field. Method. Based on a sample of relevant digital humanities literature from the China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) database, we applied bibliometric methods and visualisation tools for a longitudinal examination. Analysis. This study took CNKI as the data source and extracted keywords for an analysis of the research output, intellectual structures, and distribution features of authors and institutions. Results. Digital humanities research in China is strongly associated with library and information science, with eight major reoccurring topics and themes identified. The leading research contributors in China are authors and institutions that are also identified and highlighted. Conclusions. Digital humanities research in China rapidly grew between 2012 and 2021. This study depicts the overall situation and knowledge structure of the research and establishes a benchmark for further theoretical research and practical innovation of digital humanities in China.
引言。我们调查了 2012 年至 2021 年中国数字人文领域的主要研究课题,以及在该领域产生最多研究成果的期刊、作者和机构。研究方法基于中国国家知识基础设施(CNKI)数据库中的相关数字人文文献样本,我们运用文献计量学方法和可视化工具进行了纵向研究。 分析。本研究以中国国家知识基础设施(CNKI)为数据源,提取关键词,分析作者和机构的研究成果、知识结构和分布特征。研究结果中国的数字人文研究与图书馆和信息科学密切相关,有八大重复出现的主题。中国的主要研究贡献者是作者和机构,这些也被识别和强调。结论。中国的数字人文研究在 2012 至 2021 年间迅速发展。本研究描绘了中国数字人文研究的整体状况和知识结构,为中国数字人文研究的进一步理论研究和实践创新树立了标杆。
{"title":"A bibliometric study of digital humanities research in China from 2012 to 2021","authors":"Fangli Su, Shihao Li, Qinghua Liu, Yin Zhang","doi":"10.47989/ir284336","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.47989/ir284336","url":null,"abstract":"Introduction. We investigated the main research topics of digital humanities in China from 2012 to 2021, as well as the journals, authors, and institutions that produced the most research in this field. Method. Based on a sample of relevant digital humanities literature from the China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) database, we applied bibliometric methods and visualisation tools for a longitudinal examination. Analysis. This study took CNKI as the data source and extracted keywords for an analysis of the research output, intellectual structures, and distribution features of authors and institutions. Results. Digital humanities research in China is strongly associated with library and information science, with eight major reoccurring topics and themes identified. The leading research contributors in China are authors and institutions that are also identified and highlighted. Conclusions. Digital humanities research in China rapidly grew between 2012 and 2021. This study depicts the overall situation and knowledge structure of the research and establishes a benchmark for further theoretical research and practical innovation of digital humanities in China.","PeriodicalId":509289,"journal":{"name":"Information Research an international electronic journal","volume":"60 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139178486","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Critical information quality dimensions of conversational agents for healthcare 医疗保健对话式代理的关键信息质量维度
Pub Date : 2023-12-15 DOI: 10.47989/ir284561
Caihua Liu, Guochao Peng, Shufeng Kong, Chaowang Lan, Haoliang Zhu
Introduction. The new generation of information technology changes the ways of information seeking. Conversational agents start to be applied in public to support information seeking and decision making and provide a variety of services to users such as healthcare education and consultation. The information quality of conversational agents for healthcare determines the quality of these services, while identifying critical dimensions used to assess the agents’ information quality that helps better strategise priorities for ensuring information quality has received limited attention in the literature. Method. This study conducted a questionnaire survey to investigate the critical dimensions of information quality of healthcare conversational agents. After excluding two responses from participants who declined to fill in the questionnaire, this study retained 231 responses for data analysis, out of the total 233 participants who initially responded to the survey. Analysis. The research describes the demographic information of the participants, the behavioural characteristics of using healthcare conversational agents, and the critical dimensions of information quality of the agents perceived by the participants in the survey, employing descriptive statistics. Furthermore, ANOVA was employed to compare the variances in the perceived importance of information quality dimensions between participants who had used a healthcare conversational agent and those who had not. Results. Understandability and trustworthiness were the two top concerns for the information quality of the agents from the participants’ perspective in this study. Conclusions. Results of the study show that the experience of using or not using the agents affected the participants’ perceived importance of the agent’ information quality dimensions.
引言新一代信息技术改变了人们寻求信息的方式。对话式代理开始应用于公共领域,以支持信息搜索和决策制定,并为用户提供各种服务,如医疗保健教育和咨询。医疗保健对话式代理的信息质量决定了这些服务的质量,而确定用于评估代理信息质量的关键维度,以帮助更好地制定确保信息质量的优先战略,在文献中受到的关注却很有限。研究方法本研究进行了一项问卷调查,以研究医疗保健对话代理信息质量的关键维度。在排除了两名拒绝填写问卷的参与者的回复后,本研究保留了 231 份回复进行数据分析,而最初回复调查的参与者共有 233 人。分析。本研究采用描述性统计方法描述了调查参与者的人口统计学信息、使用医疗保健对话代理的行为特征,以及调查参与者认为的代理信息质量的关键维度。此外,还采用方差分析来比较使用过医疗保健对话式代理的参与者与未使用过医疗保健对话式代理的参与者对信息质量各维度重要性的认知差异。 结果显示在本研究中,从参与者的角度来看,可理解性和可信度是他们最关心的两个信息质量问题。 结论研究结果表明,使用或未使用代理的经历影响了参与者对代理信息质量维度重要性的感知。
{"title":"Critical information quality dimensions of conversational agents for healthcare","authors":"Caihua Liu, Guochao Peng, Shufeng Kong, Chaowang Lan, Haoliang Zhu","doi":"10.47989/ir284561","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.47989/ir284561","url":null,"abstract":"Introduction. The new generation of information technology changes the ways of information seeking. Conversational agents start to be applied in public to support information seeking and decision making and provide a variety of services to users such as healthcare education and consultation. The information quality of conversational agents for healthcare determines the quality of these services, while identifying critical dimensions used to assess the agents’ information quality that helps better strategise priorities for ensuring information quality has received limited attention in the literature. Method. This study conducted a questionnaire survey to investigate the critical dimensions of information quality of healthcare conversational agents. After excluding two responses from participants who declined to fill in the questionnaire, this study retained 231 responses for data analysis, out of the total 233 participants who initially responded to the survey. Analysis. The research describes the demographic information of the participants, the behavioural characteristics of using healthcare conversational agents, and the critical dimensions of information quality of the agents perceived by the participants in the survey, employing descriptive statistics. Furthermore, ANOVA was employed to compare the variances in the perceived importance of information quality dimensions between participants who had used a healthcare conversational agent and those who had not. Results. Understandability and trustworthiness were the two top concerns for the information quality of the agents from the participants’ perspective in this study. Conclusions. Results of the study show that the experience of using or not using the agents affected the participants’ perceived importance of the agent’ information quality dimensions.","PeriodicalId":509289,"journal":{"name":"Information Research an international electronic journal","volume":"94 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139178755","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Information Research an international electronic journal
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1