Heart Surgery Forum最新文献

Emboli caused by cardiac myxomas mostly occur in the cardiovascular or cerebrovascular systems and rarely in the lower extremity vasculature. We introduce the rare case of a patient with left atrial myxoma (LAM) whose right lower extremity (RLE) suffered from acute ischemia due to tumor fragments, along with a review of the relevant literature, and highlight the clinical characteristics of LAM. An 81-year-old female presented with acute ischemia of RLE. Color Doppler ultrasound showed no blood flow signal far from the RLE femoral artery. Computed tomography angiography showed an occlusion of the right common femoral artery. A transthoracic echocardiogram revealed a left atrial mass. Femoral artery embolectomy was performed under local anesthesia, followed by thoracotomy with tumor resection under general anesthesia on postoperative day seven. The tumor was pathologically confirmed as an atrial myxoma. A literature search of the PubMed database returned 58 cases of limb ischemia due to LAM, and the conclusions drawn from the statistical analysis were that emboli from LAM occurred most commonly in the aortoiliac and bilateral lower limb vasculature and were rarely associated with upper extremity and atrial fibrillation. Multisystem embolism is characteristic of cardiac myxoma. The removed embolus should be examined pathologically for signs of a cardiac myxoma. Lower-limb embolisms should be promptly diagnosed and treated to avoid osteofascial compartment syndrome.

Background: Thoracic endovascular aortic repair is a relatively new technique relative to open surgery, and our aim was to assess whether there is a difference in the risk of common postoperative complications between thoracic endovascular aortic repair and open surgery.

Methods: The PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane library were systematically searched for trials comparing thoracic endovascular aortic repair and open surgical repair from January 2000 to September 2022. Primary outcome was death, other outcomes included common associated complications. Data were combined using risk ratio or standardized mean difference with 95% confidence interval. Funnel plot and egger's test were used for assessing publication bias. The study protocol was registered prospectively with PROSPERO (CRD42022372324).

Results: This trial included 11 controlled clinical studies with 3667 patients. Thoracic endovascular aortic repair had lower risk of death (risk ratio [RR], 0.59; 95% CI, 0.49 to 0.73; p < 0.00001; I2 = 0), dialysis (RR, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.47 to 0.65; p < 0.00001; I2 = 37%), stroke (RR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.51 to 0.98; p = 0.03; I2 = 40%), bleeding (RR, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.23 to 0.83; p = 0.01; I2 = 56%), and respiratory complications (RR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.60 to 0.76; p < 0.00001; I2 = 37%) compared with open surgical repair. In addition, the length of hospital stay was shorter in the thoracic endovascular aortic repair group (SMD, -0.84; 95% CI, -1.30 to -0.38; p = 0.0003; I2 = 80%).

Conclusions: Thoracic endovascular aortic repair has significant advantages over open surgical repair, in terms of postoperative complications and survival in Stanford type B aortic dissection patients.

Background: Aortic root dilatation (AoD) frequently occurs following repaired tetralogy of Fallot (rTOF). The objective of this study was to assess aortic dimensions, investigate the prevalence of AoD, and identify predictors of AoD in rTOF patients.

Methods: A cross-sectional retrospective study was conducted in repaired TOF patients from 2009 to 2020. Aortic root diameters were measured by cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR). Severe AoD of the aortic sinus (AoS) was defined as a Z-score (z) of >4, reflecting a mean percentile ≥99.99%.

Results: Two hundred forty-eight patients, with a median age of 28.2 years (10.2-65.3 years), were included in the study. The median age at the time of repair was 6.6 years (0.8-40.5 years) and the median interval between the repair and CMR study was 18.9 years (2.0-54.8 years). The prevalence of severe AoD was found to be 35.2% when defined by an AoS z greater than 4 and 27.6% when defined by a AoS diameter ≥40 mm, respectively. A total of 101 patients (40.7%) had aortic regurgitation (AR), with 7 patients (2.8%) having moderate AR. Multivariate analysis revealed that severe AoD was only associated with the left ventricular end diastolic volume index (LVEDVi) and a longer duration after repair. The age at the time of repair for TOF was found not to be correlated with the development of AoD.

Conclusions: After repair of TOF, severe AoD was found to be prevalent, but no fatal complications were observed in our study. Mild AR was also commonly observed. Larger LVEDVi and a longer duration after repair were identified as factors associated with the development of severe AoD. Therefore, routine monitoring of AoD is recommended.

Background: To analyze the clinical effect of debranching thoracic endovascular aortic repair combined with ascending aortic banding.

Methods: The clinical data of patients who underwent a debranching thoracic endovascular aortic repair combined with ascending aortic banding at Anzhen Hospital (Beijing, China) between January 2019 and December 2021 were reviewed to evaluate the occurrence and outcomes of postoperative complications.

Results: A total of 30 patients underwent a debranching thoracic endovascular aortic repair combined with ascending aortic banding. There were 28 male patients (93.3%) with an average age of 59.9 ± 11.8 years. Twenty-five patients underwent simultaneous surgery and five patients had staged surgery. Postoperatively, two patients developed complete paraplegia (6.7%), three patients developed incomplete paraplegia (10%), two patients developed cerebral infarction (6.7%), and one patient developed femoral artery thromboembolism (3.3%). No patient died during the perioperative period, and one patient (3.3%) died during the follow-up period. None of the patients underwent retrograde type A aortic dissection during the perioperative and postoperative follow-up periods.

Conclusions: Banding the ascending aorta with a vascular graft to restrict its movement and to serve as the proximal anchoring area of the stent graft can reduce the risk of retrograde type A aortic dissection.

Background: Sutureless aortic valve replacement (SU-AVR) and transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) are becoming increasingly common. The aim of this study is to compare the clinical outcome and cost-effectiveness of the two methods.

Methods: In this study, cross-sectional retrospective data were collected on 327 patients who underwent SU-AVR (n = 168) and TAVI (n = 159). Homogeneous groups were provided by the "propensity score matching" method, and 61 patients from the SU-AVR group and 53 patients from the TAVI group were included in the study sample.

Results: The two groups did not have statistically different death rates, complications after surgery, lengths of hospital stays, or visits to the intensive care unit. It is stated that the SU-AVR method provides an additional 1.14 Quality-Adjusted Life Year (QALY) compared to the TAVI method. The TAVI was more expensive than the SU-AVR in our study, but the difference was not statistically significant ($40,520.62 vs. $38,405.62, p > 0.05). For SU-AVR, the most expensive factor was the length of stay in the intensive care unit; for TAVI, it was arrhythmia, bleeding, and renal failure.

Conclusions: These bioprostheses are safe and effective treatments for valve stenosis. Clinical outcomes were similar between the two groups. Therefore, clinicians may find it difficult to determine an effective treatment strategy. According to the evaluation made in terms of cost-effectiveness, it was found that the SU-AVR method gave a higher QALY at a lower cost compared to the TAVI method. However, this result is not statistically significant.

Background: Although many clinicians have made efforts to improve the prognosis for giant left ventricular with valve disease patients, potential markers to judge the prognosis of giant left ventricular patients undergoing valve surgery are still unknown. The purpose of this study was to explore the possible impact factors for giant left ventricle prognosis.

Methods: From September 2019 to September 2022, 75 patients with preoperative valvular disease with a giant left ventricle (left ventricular end diastolic diameter (LVEDD) >65 mm) underwent cardiac valve surgery. The changes in cardiac function one year after surgery were used to describe prognosis and analyze the potential independent factors affecting surgical prognosis. The left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was considered to be recovered if it was ≥50% on follow-up echocardiography at least 6 months after the diagnosis.

Results: The cardiac function of patients with a giant left ventricular and valve disease improved. Compared with preoperation, the left ventricular end diastolic diameter (LVEDD), left ventricular end-systolic dimension (LVESD), pulmonary artery systolic pressure (PASP), NT-proBNP, and cardio thoracic ratio (CTR) were significantly decreased (p < 0.05), and the ratio of severe heart failure was decreased from 60% to 37.33%. In the univariate analyses, the preoperative NT-proBNP levels and PASP were significantly associated with the cardiac function recovery (odds ratio [OR] = 1.001, 95% CI 1.000-1.002, p = 0.027; OR = 1.092, 95% CI 1.015-1.175, p = 0.018). However, during the diagnostic test, PASP did not account for cardiac function recovery (AUROC = 0.505, 95% CI = 0.387-0.713, p = 0.531). Based on the cutoff value in the experiment, we found that a NT-proBNP >753 pg/mL (AUROC = 0.851, 95% CI = 0.757-0.946, p < 0.0001) was a potential prognostic marker for patients with a giant left ventricular valve disease.

Conclusions: We have demonstrated that an elevated preoperative NT-proBNP level is an independent predictor of cardiac function recovery in a cohort of giant left ventricular patients undergoing valve surgery, and this is the first study about this specific cohort of patients.

Background: New-onset postoperative atrial fibrillation (POAF) is the most common complication after valvular surgery, but its etiology and risk factors are incompletely understood. This study investigates the benefits of machine learning methods in risk prediction and in identifying relative perioperative variables for POAF after valve surgery.

Methods: This retrospective study involved 847 patients, who underwent isolated valve surgery from January 2018 to September 2021 in our institution. We used machine learning algorithms to predict new-onset postoperative atrial fibrillation and to select relatively important variables from a set of 123 preoperative characteristics and intraoperative information.

Results: The support vector machine (SVM) model demonstrated the best area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUC) value of 0.786, followed by logistic regression (AUC = 0.745) and the Complement Naive Bayes (CNB) model (AUC = 0.672). Left atrium diameter, age, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), duration of cardiopulmonary bypass, New York Heart Association (NYHA) class III-IV, and preoperative hemoglobin were high-ranked variables.

Conclusions: Risk models based on machine learning algorithms may be superior to traditional models, which were primarily based on logistic algorithms to predict the occurrence of POAF after valve surgery. Further prospective multicenter studies are needed to confirm the performance of SVM in predicting POAF.

Background: Improving health related quality of life is an important goal of aortic valve replacement. Inadequate effective orifice area of prosthesis according to the patient's body surface area may be associated with poor outcomes. In this study, we aimed to analyze impact of indexed effective orifice area (iEOA) on patients' quality of life after aortic valve replacement.

Methods: A total of 138 patients who underwent isolated aortic valve replacement were included to the study. Quality of life assessment was performed with EuroQol Group EQ-5D-5L questionnaire. Patients were divided into three groups based on iEOA (Group 1 had an iEOA of <0.65 cm2/m2 (19 patients), Group 2 had an iEOA between 0.65-0.85 cm2/m2 (71 patients), and Group 3 had an iEOA of >0.85 cm2/m2). Mean EQ-5D-5L scores were compared among the groups statistically.

Results: Mean EQ-5D-5L scores were lower in Group 1 than in Groups 2 and 3 (Group 1: 0.72 ± 0.18, Group 2: 0.83 ± 0.20, and Group 3: 0.86 ± 0.9, p = 0.044 and p = 0.014). The EQ-5D-5L score was significantly lower in patients with a ≥20 mmHg transvalvular gradient than those with a <20 mmHg (0.74 ± 0.25 vs. 0.84 ± 0.18, p = 0.014).

Conclusions: Our results show that an iEOA <0.65 cm2/m2 is significantly associated with impaired postoperative health-related quality of life. Newer generation prostheses, transcatheter valve implantation, and root enlargement techniques should be kept in mind in preoperative planning.

Background: To investigate the association between the pretreatment systemic immune-inflammation index (SII) and restenosis after interventions for lower extremity arteriosclerosis obliterans (ASO).

Methods: We retrospectively evaluated 309 patients with ASO who underwent endovascular interventions between January 2018 and December 2021. Pretreatment inflammatory markers, including the SII, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), systemic inflammation response index (SIRI), aggregate index of systemic inflammation (AISI), and C-reactive protein (CRP) were collected. The logistic regression model was used to determine the associations between these inflammatory markers and restenosis. Clinical manifestations, ankle-brachial index (ABI), and quality of life after intervention also were compared.

Results: The pretreatment SII (p < 0.001), NLR (p < 0.001), PLR (p < 0.001), SIRI (p = 0.002), AISI (p < 0.001), and CRP (p = 0.036) were significantly higher in patients with restenosis than in those without restenosis. Among the four markers, SII had the highest area under the curve (AUC) in predicting restenosis (SII vs. NLR vs. PLR vs. SIRI vs. AISI vs. CRP: 0.715 vs. 0.689 vs. 0.695 vs. 0.643 vs. 0.691 vs. 0.596). Multivariate analysis revealed that the pretreatment SII was the only independent factor for restenosis (hazard ratio [HR]: 4.102; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.155-14.567; p = 0.029). Moreover, a lower SII was associated with significantly better improvements in clinical manifestations (Rutherford classification 1-2: 67.5% vs. 52.9%, p = 0.038) and ABI (median: 0.29 vs. 0.22; p = 0.029), together with better quality of life (p < 0.05 for physical functioning, social functioning, pain, and mental health).

Conclusions: The pretreatment SII is an independent predictor of restenosis after interventions in patients with lower extremity ASO, providing more accurate prognosis prediction than other inflammatory markers.

Background: In general, cerebral blood flow accounts for 10-15% of cardiac output (CO), of which about 75% is delivered through the carotid arteries. Hence, if carotid blood flow (CBF) is constantly proportional to CO with high reproducibility and reliability, it would be of great value to measure CBF as an alternative to CO. The aim of this study was to investigate the direct correlation between CBF and CO. We hypothesized that measurement of CBF could be a good substitute for CO, even under more extreme hemodynamic conditions, for a wider range of critically ill patients.

Methods: Patients aged 65-80 years, undergoing elective cardiac surgery were included in this study. CBF in different cardiac cycles were measured by ultrasound: systolic carotid blood flow (SCF), diastolic carotid blood flow (DCF), and total (systolic and diastolic) carotid blood flow (TCF). CO simultaneously was measured by transesophageal echocardiography.

Results: For all patients, the correlation coefficients between SCF and CO, TCF and CO were 0.45 and 0.30, respectively, which were statistically significant, but not between DCF and CO. There was no significant correlation between either SCF, TCF or DCF and CO, when CO was <3.5 L/min.

Conclusions: Systolic carotid blood flow may be used as a better index to replace CO. However, the method of direct measurement of CO is essential when the patient's heart function is poor.