Pub Date : 2024-05-13DOI: 10.53822/2712-9276-2024-1-106-127
I. N. Utkin
{"title":"Bishop Sergius (Stragorodsky) at the Religious and Philosophical Meetings of 1901–1903: defending Church Truth","authors":"I. N. Utkin","doi":"10.53822/2712-9276-2024-1-106-127","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.53822/2712-9276-2024-1-106-127","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":512431,"journal":{"name":"Orthodoxia","volume":"80 14","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140984734","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-05-13DOI: 10.53822/2712-9276-2024-1-50-79
A. P. Kozyrev
{"title":"Metropolitan Sergius (Stragorodsky) as a Critic of Sophiology of Archpriest Sergius Bulgakov. On the History of the “Sophia Dispute”","authors":"A. P. Kozyrev","doi":"10.53822/2712-9276-2024-1-50-79","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.53822/2712-9276-2024-1-50-79","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":512431,"journal":{"name":"Orthodoxia","volume":"122 22","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140985454","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-05-13DOI: 10.53822/2712-9276-2024-1-128-151
A. V. Razin
{"title":"On the Ecclesiological Views of Patriarch Sergius (Stragorodsky)","authors":"A. V. Razin","doi":"10.53822/2712-9276-2024-1-128-151","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.53822/2712-9276-2024-1-128-151","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":512431,"journal":{"name":"Orthodoxia","volume":"14 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140984093","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-05-13DOI: 10.53822/2712-9276-2024-1-80-105
N. V. Kasyarum
{"title":"The Theological Position of Metropolitan Sergius (Stragorodsky) in the Dispute over Sophiology","authors":"N. V. Kasyarum","doi":"10.53822/2712-9276-2024-1-80-105","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.53822/2712-9276-2024-1-80-105","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":512431,"journal":{"name":"Orthodoxia","volume":"9 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140983162","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-05-12DOI: 10.53822/2712-9276-2024-1-10-27
A. V. Shchipkov
{"title":"The Grand Mission of Patriarch Sergius (Stragorodsky). On the Occasion of the 80th Anniversary of the Second Reinstatement of the Patriarchate","authors":"A. V. Shchipkov","doi":"10.53822/2712-9276-2024-1-10-27","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.53822/2712-9276-2024-1-10-27","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":512431,"journal":{"name":"Orthodoxia","volume":"114 23","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-05-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140986270","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-05-12DOI: 10.53822/2712-9276-2024-1-28-49
L. N. Pokrovsky, A. K. Sorokin
{"title":"“Our Orthodox Church has always shared the fate of the people”. The Most Holy Patriarch Sergius during the Great Patriotic War","authors":"L. N. Pokrovsky, A. K. Sorokin","doi":"10.53822/2712-9276-2024-1-28-49","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.53822/2712-9276-2024-1-28-49","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":512431,"journal":{"name":"Orthodoxia","volume":"101 34","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-05-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140987364","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-01-11DOI: 10.53822/2712-9276-2023-4-154-173
V. Y. Darenskiy
The article examines the main “internal” theme of S. S. Averintsev’s research, which has a paradigmatic character both for him as a scientist and for Christian philosophy of culture as a whole. This is the problem of Christianization of culture as a unique paradoxical process of filling and transformation of old pagan forms of culture under the influence of new Christian content. This process is shown by S. S. Averintsev as a model of paraphrase and paradox as forms of transcending consciousness for the openness of the gospel message. The article discusses the works of S. S. Averintsev dedicated to different periods of world culture from antiquity to the 20th century. In his diverse problematic, S. S. Averintsev uses the method of “revealing” transcendent elements of culture based on the analysis of cultural morphology. In particular, it is shown that the synthesis of the conditional pagan “West” and the biblical “East”, realized by Orthodox New Rome (“Byzantium”), was the main cultural and historiosophical theme of S. S. Averintsev, which unfolds in his works on the material of different historical epochs and different cultural regions. In his works on the culture of the 20th century, he provides a diagnosis and prognosis of processes in contemporary culture, and critically analyzes key concepts of cultural analysis during this period. According to S. S. Averintsev, Christian culture, especially in the era of secularization, de facto can become a kind of “compensator” for the lack of Christian life. On the other hand, the task of Christian culture is to provoke the awakening of Christian life, to penetrate into everyday life as a meaningful transcendence. This allows us to consider his concept as an original response to the challenge of secularization.
文章探讨了斯-斯-阿维林采夫研究的主要 "内部 "主题,该主题对于作为科学家的斯-斯-阿维林采夫和整个基督教文化哲学而言都具有典范性。这就是文化的基督教化问题,它是在新的基督教内容影响下填充和改造旧的异教文化形式的一个独特的矛盾过程。斯-斯-阿维林采夫将这一过程作为比喻和悖论的典范,将其视为超越意识的形式,以促进福音信息的开放性。文章讨论了斯-斯-阿维林采夫从古代到 20 世纪不同时期的世界文化作品。S. S. 阿维林采夫在他的各种问题中使用了基于文化形态学分析的 "揭示 "文化超越元素的方法。他特别指出,由东正教新罗马("拜占庭")实现的有条件异教 "西方 "与圣经 "东方 "的综合,是 S. S. 阿维林采夫的主要文化和历史哲学主题,这在他关于不同历史时代和不同文化区域材料的著作中得到了展现。在他关于 20 世纪文化的作品中,他对当代文化进程进行了诊断和预测,并对这一时期文化分析的关键概念进行了批判性分析。斯-斯-阿维林采夫认为,基督教文化,尤其是在世俗化时代,事实上可以成为一种对基督教生活缺失的 "补偿"。另一方面,基督教文化的任务是唤醒基督徒的生活,将其作为一种有意义的超越渗透到日常生活中。这使我们能够将他的概念视为对世俗化挑战的原创性回应。
{"title":"The Churching of Culture as the Main Theme of S. S. Averintsev","authors":"V. Y. Darenskiy","doi":"10.53822/2712-9276-2023-4-154-173","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.53822/2712-9276-2023-4-154-173","url":null,"abstract":"The article examines the main “internal” theme of S. S. Averintsev’s research, which has a paradigmatic character both for him as a scientist and for Christian philosophy of culture as a whole. This is the problem of Christianization of culture as a unique paradoxical process of filling and transformation of old pagan forms of culture under the influence of new Christian content. This process is shown by S. S. Averintsev as a model of paraphrase and paradox as forms of transcending consciousness for the openness of the gospel message. The article discusses the works of S. S. Averintsev dedicated to different periods of world culture from antiquity to the 20th century. In his diverse problematic, S. S. Averintsev uses the method of “revealing” transcendent elements of culture based on the analysis of cultural morphology. In particular, it is shown that the synthesis of the conditional pagan “West” and the biblical “East”, realized by Orthodox New Rome (“Byzantium”), was the main cultural and historiosophical theme of S. S. Averintsev, which unfolds in his works on the material of different historical epochs and different cultural regions. In his works on the culture of the 20th century, he provides a diagnosis and prognosis of processes in contemporary culture, and critically analyzes key concepts of cultural analysis during this period. According to S. S. Averintsev, Christian culture, especially in the era of secularization, de facto can become a kind of “compensator” for the lack of Christian life. On the other hand, the task of Christian culture is to provoke the awakening of Christian life, to penetrate into everyday life as a meaningful transcendence. This allows us to consider his concept as an original response to the challenge of secularization.","PeriodicalId":512431,"journal":{"name":"Orthodoxia","volume":"52 13","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-01-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140510046","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-01-11DOI: 10.53822/2712-9276-2023-4-174-191
A. G. Zoitakis
Despite historical, cultural, and religious storms and instabilities that intermittently cloud interstate relations, the shared Orthodox faith has consistently fostered the strengthening of ties between the Russian and Greek peoples. Within Orthodoxy, authorities for the Church are not only the texts of sacred books but also revered individuals—saints. The veneration of ascetics unites different nations in a single spiritual realm. Biographies of Russian saints garner significant interest among Greek readers. Apart from numerous translated and compiled works, there exist many original research pieces. Some Russian ascetics are even more renowned in Greece than in their homeland. A particular phenomenon is the veneration of Archbishop Luke of Simferopol and Crimea (Valentin Voyno-Yasenetsky). This article attempts to trace the origins, scale and nature of the veneration of St. Luke in Greece. Greeks first learned about Archbishop Luke of Simferopol and Crimea during his lifetime, in 1957, when a lecture about him was delivered for the first time. However, the true nationwide popularity of St. Luke’s name was earned thanks to the efforts of Archimandrite (since 2013, Metropolitan of Argolis) Nectarios (Antonopoulos). He first heard about St. Luke in the summer of 1996. Archimandrite bought a book about Archbishop Luke by Archdeacon Vasiliy Marushchak, “The Blessed Surgeon: The Life of Saint Luke of Simferopol” in Crimea and commissioned its translation into Greek. He then extensively traveled to the places where the saint once lived. For many years, Antonopoulos independently collected archival materials and interviewed people who knew Valentin Voyno-Yasenetsky. As a result of this work, in 1999, Father Nectarios published his book “Archbishop Luke. A Saint Pastor and Physician Surgeon” in Greek, which has been reprinted multiple times (the 28th edition was released in 2020). This article discusses this and other publications dedicated to St. Luke in the Greek language. It also focuses on academic conferences devoted to understanding the legacy of the saint. As of 2016, more than 40 newly constructed churches dedicated to St. Luke (Voyno-Yasenetsky) were consecrated in Greece. The article details the most famous centers of veneration of the saint in Greece and some of the churches built and consecrated in recent years. Additionally, it provides some information on the veneration of St. Luke in the Balkan Peninsula and Cyprus.
{"title":"The phenomenon of veneration of St. Luke of Crimea in Greece","authors":"A. G. Zoitakis","doi":"10.53822/2712-9276-2023-4-174-191","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.53822/2712-9276-2023-4-174-191","url":null,"abstract":"Despite historical, cultural, and religious storms and instabilities that intermittently cloud interstate relations, the shared Orthodox faith has consistently fostered the strengthening of ties between the Russian and Greek peoples. Within Orthodoxy, authorities for the Church are not only the texts of sacred books but also revered individuals—saints. The veneration of ascetics unites different nations in a single spiritual realm. Biographies of Russian saints garner significant interest among Greek readers. Apart from numerous translated and compiled works, there exist many original research pieces. Some Russian ascetics are even more renowned in Greece than in their homeland. A particular phenomenon is the veneration of Archbishop Luke of Simferopol and Crimea (Valentin Voyno-Yasenetsky). This article attempts to trace the origins, scale and nature of the veneration of St. Luke in Greece. Greeks first learned about Archbishop Luke of Simferopol and Crimea during his lifetime, in 1957, when a lecture about him was delivered for the first time. However, the true nationwide popularity of St. Luke’s name was earned thanks to the efforts of Archimandrite (since 2013, Metropolitan of Argolis) Nectarios (Antonopoulos). He first heard about St. Luke in the summer of 1996. Archimandrite bought a book about Archbishop Luke by Archdeacon Vasiliy Marushchak, “The Blessed Surgeon: The Life of Saint Luke of Simferopol” in Crimea and commissioned its translation into Greek. He then extensively traveled to the places where the saint once lived. For many years, Antonopoulos independently collected archival materials and interviewed people who knew Valentin Voyno-Yasenetsky. As a result of this work, in 1999, Father Nectarios published his book “Archbishop Luke. A Saint Pastor and Physician Surgeon” in Greek, which has been reprinted multiple times (the 28th edition was released in 2020). This article discusses this and other publications dedicated to St. Luke in the Greek language. It also focuses on academic conferences devoted to understanding the legacy of the saint. As of 2016, more than 40 newly constructed churches dedicated to St. Luke (Voyno-Yasenetsky) were consecrated in Greece. The article details the most famous centers of veneration of the saint in Greece and some of the churches built and consecrated in recent years. Additionally, it provides some information on the veneration of St. Luke in the Balkan Peninsula and Cyprus.","PeriodicalId":512431,"journal":{"name":"Orthodoxia","volume":" 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-01-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139625480","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-01-11DOI: 10.53822/2712-9276-2023-4-118-153
L. V. Shchipkova
This article explores the phenomenon of religious revival among the Orthodox youth in the Soviet Union during the 1970s. The author argues that during this period, some processes took place within a segment of the intellectual Soviet youth that could be described as the Soviet religious renaissance. This phase coincided with Brezhnev’s rise to power and a temporary easing of anti-religious persecution. In the 1960s–70s, the USSR passed several legislative acts that improved the conditions for believers and religious organizations, granting them comparatively greater rights. However, the state retained the authority to intervene in the Church’s internal affairs and rigorously control its activities, leading to a decline in the number of Orthodox parishes from year to year. Nevertheless, a religious-oriented vector was forming in the minds and souls of the thinking Soviet youth. In the 1970s, several movements emerged, actively seeking forms of spiritual life. One notable phenomenon of religious dissidence was the preaching activities of priest Dmitry Dudko. In 1974, followers of Father Dmitry organized the enlightening “Ogorodnikov Seminar”, named after one of its founders. The seminar studied theological and philosophical literature, which its participants struggled to obtain. The seminar later began publishing the journal “Obshchina” (Community). Simultaneously with the Moscow christian seminar, the religious and philosophical Goricheva-Krivulin Seminar emerged in Leningrad. The article delves into the history of Orthodox samizdat (self-published works and underground press) in the 1970s, particularly the journals “Obshchina” (Community) “Veche” (Popular Assembly), and “Moskovsky Sbornik” (Moscow Collection). The Orthodox revival of the 1970s culminated in the early 1980s due to severe repression by Soviet authorities. Typically, those representatives aligned with Russian patriotic ideologies received the longest prison sentences. The author concludes that the ideas of nationally-oriented, patriotic figures and publicists remain relevant to this day.
{"title":"Self-Organization Processes of Orthodox Youth in the 1970s","authors":"L. V. Shchipkova","doi":"10.53822/2712-9276-2023-4-118-153","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.53822/2712-9276-2023-4-118-153","url":null,"abstract":"This article explores the phenomenon of religious revival among the Orthodox youth in the Soviet Union during the 1970s. The author argues that during this period, some processes took place within a segment of the intellectual Soviet youth that could be described as the Soviet religious renaissance. This phase coincided with Brezhnev’s rise to power and a temporary easing of anti-religious persecution. In the 1960s–70s, the USSR passed several legislative acts that improved the conditions for believers and religious organizations, granting them comparatively greater rights. However, the state retained the authority to intervene in the Church’s internal affairs and rigorously control its activities, leading to a decline in the number of Orthodox parishes from year to year. Nevertheless, a religious-oriented vector was forming in the minds and souls of the thinking Soviet youth. In the 1970s, several movements emerged, actively seeking forms of spiritual life. One notable phenomenon of religious dissidence was the preaching activities of priest Dmitry Dudko. In 1974, followers of Father Dmitry organized the enlightening “Ogorodnikov Seminar”, named after one of its founders. The seminar studied theological and philosophical literature, which its participants struggled to obtain. The seminar later began publishing the journal “Obshchina” (Community). Simultaneously with the Moscow christian seminar, the religious and philosophical Goricheva-Krivulin Seminar emerged in Leningrad. The article delves into the history of Orthodox samizdat (self-published works and underground press) in the 1970s, particularly the journals “Obshchina” (Community) “Veche” (Popular Assembly), and “Moskovsky Sbornik” (Moscow Collection). The Orthodox revival of the 1970s culminated in the early 1980s due to severe repression by Soviet authorities. Typically, those representatives aligned with Russian patriotic ideologies received the longest prison sentences. The author concludes that the ideas of nationally-oriented, patriotic figures and publicists remain relevant to this day.","PeriodicalId":512431,"journal":{"name":"Orthodoxia","volume":" 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-01-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139626656","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-01-10DOI: 10.53822/2712-9276-2023-4-10-29
I. B. Ivanov
Based on the author’s collected memories of participants in the events described, memoirs, journalistic articles published in Russian and Russian emigrant publications, as well as on the documentary materials of the classified court proceedings that took place in Leningrad in 1967–1968, the article recounts the history and ideology of the underground anti-communist organization — the All-Russian Social Christian Union for the Liberation of the People (VSKhSON). The publication focuses on the fate of the founder of the All-Russian Social Christian Union for the Liberation of the People, the outstanding Russian Orthodox thinker Igor Vyacheslavovich Ogurtsov, who, in the early 1960s, along with a group of his associates, advocated for the synthesis of Christianity, patriotism, and social ideas against the communist system. Particular attention is given to the Program of the All-Russian Social Christian Union for the Liberation of the People. Written by Igor Ogurtsov 60 years ago, it remains relevant today in both scientific and political contexts. The author of the Program, while analyzing the communist system, not only predicted the inevitability of communism’s collapse but also proposed a specific path for the rebirth of Russia after the fall of the “party dictatorship” — a path rejecting the extremities of both socialist and capitalist perspectives and implying the country’s further development based on the principles of sociality and Christian ideals.
{"title":"Igor Ogurtsov: A Visionary Orthodox Thinker Ahead of His Time","authors":"I. B. Ivanov","doi":"10.53822/2712-9276-2023-4-10-29","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.53822/2712-9276-2023-4-10-29","url":null,"abstract":"Based on the author’s collected memories of participants in the events described, memoirs, journalistic articles published in Russian and Russian emigrant publications, as well as on the documentary materials of the classified court proceedings that took place in Leningrad in 1967–1968, the article recounts the history and ideology of the underground anti-communist organization — the All-Russian Social Christian Union for the Liberation of the People (VSKhSON). The publication focuses on the fate of the founder of the All-Russian Social Christian Union for the Liberation of the People, the outstanding Russian Orthodox thinker Igor Vyacheslavovich Ogurtsov, who, in the early 1960s, along with a group of his associates, advocated for the synthesis of Christianity, patriotism, and social ideas against the communist system. Particular attention is given to the Program of the All-Russian Social Christian Union for the Liberation of the People. Written by Igor Ogurtsov 60 years ago, it remains relevant today in both scientific and political contexts. The author of the Program, while analyzing the communist system, not only predicted the inevitability of communism’s collapse but also proposed a specific path for the rebirth of Russia after the fall of the “party dictatorship” — a path rejecting the extremities of both socialist and capitalist perspectives and implying the country’s further development based on the principles of sociality and Christian ideals.","PeriodicalId":512431,"journal":{"name":"Orthodoxia","volume":" 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139627538","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}