Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the leading cause of illness and death in the US and is substantially affected by social determinants of health, such as social, economic, and environmental factors. CVD disproportionately affects groups that have been economically and socially marginalized, yet health care and public health professionals often lack tools for collecting and using data to understand and address CVD inequities among their populations of focus. The Health Equity Indicators for Cardiovascular Disease Toolkit (HEI for CVD Toolkit) seeks to address this gap by providing metrics, measurement guidance, and resources to support users collecting, measuring, and analyzing data relevant to their CVD work. The toolkit includes a conceptual framework (a visual model for understanding health inequities in CVD); a comprehensive list of health equity indicators (metrics of inequities that influence CVD prevention, care, and management); guidance in definitions, measures, and data sources; lessons learned and examples of HEI implementation; and other resources to support health equity measurement. To develop this toolkit, we performed literature scans to identify primary topics and themes relevant to addressing inequities in CVD, engaged with subject matter experts in health equity and CVD, and conducted pilot studies to understand the feasibility of gathering and analyzing data on the social determinants of health in various settings. This comprehensive development process resulted in a toolkit that can help users understand the drivers of inequities in their communities or patient populations, assess progress, evaluate intervention outcomes, and guide actions to address CVD disparities.
在美国,心血管疾病(CVD)是导致疾病和死亡的主要原因,它在很大程度上受到健康的社会决定因素(如社会、经济和环境因素)的影响。心血管疾病对经济和社会边缘化群体的影响尤为严重,但医疗保健和公共卫生专业人员往往缺乏收集和使用数据的工具,无法了解和解决重点人群中的心血管疾病不平等问题。心血管疾病健康公平指标工具包》(HEI for CVD Toolkit)旨在通过提供指标、测量指导和资源来支持用户收集、测量和分析与其心血管疾病工作相关的数据,从而弥补这一不足。该工具包包括一个概念框架(用于理解心血管疾病健康不公平现象的可视化模型);一份全面的健康公平指标清单(影响心血管疾病预防、护理和管理的不公平度量指标);定义、度量和数据来源指南;实施健康公平指数的经验教训和实例;以及支持健康公平度量的其他资源。为开发该工具包,我们进行了文献扫描,以确定与解决心血管疾病不公平问题相关的主要议题和主题,与健康公平和心血管疾病方面的主题专家进行了交流,并开展了试点研究,以了解在各种环境下收集和分析健康的社会决定因素数据的可行性。通过这一全面的开发过程,最终形成了一个工具包,可帮助用户了解其社区或患者群体中不公平现象的驱动因素,评估进展情况,评价干预结果,并指导解决心血管疾病差异的行动。
{"title":"A Toolkit to Facilitate the Selection and Measurement of Health Equity Indicators for Cardiovascular Disease.","authors":"Dorothy Wei, Simone McPherson, Refilwe Moeti, Amma Boakye, Lillian Whiting-Collins, Amena Abbas, Ebony Montgomery, Lauren Toledo, Marla Vaughan","doi":"10.5888/pcd21.240077","DOIUrl":"10.5888/pcd21.240077","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the leading cause of illness and death in the US and is substantially affected by social determinants of health, such as social, economic, and environmental factors. CVD disproportionately affects groups that have been economically and socially marginalized, yet health care and public health professionals often lack tools for collecting and using data to understand and address CVD inequities among their populations of focus. The Health Equity Indicators for Cardiovascular Disease Toolkit (HEI for CVD Toolkit) seeks to address this gap by providing metrics, measurement guidance, and resources to support users collecting, measuring, and analyzing data relevant to their CVD work. The toolkit includes a conceptual framework (a visual model for understanding health inequities in CVD); a comprehensive list of health equity indicators (metrics of inequities that influence CVD prevention, care, and management); guidance in definitions, measures, and data sources; lessons learned and examples of HEI implementation; and other resources to support health equity measurement. To develop this toolkit, we performed literature scans to identify primary topics and themes relevant to addressing inequities in CVD, engaged with subject matter experts in health equity and CVD, and conducted pilot studies to understand the feasibility of gathering and analyzing data on the social determinants of health in various settings. This comprehensive development process resulted in a toolkit that can help users understand the drivers of inequities in their communities or patient populations, assess progress, evaluate intervention outcomes, and guide actions to address CVD disparities.</p>","PeriodicalId":51273,"journal":{"name":"Preventing Chronic Disease","volume":"21 ","pages":"E78"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4,"publicationDate":"2024-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11505916/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142401826","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Introduction: Many mental disorders begin in early childhood. Without timely treatment, mental disorders experienced by young children can impair their learning ability and relationships with others, causing lifelong complications. However, not all children with a mental disorder in early childhood receive treatment.
Methods: Using data collected from 46,424 children aged 2 to 8 years in the 2 most recent cycles of the National Survey of Children's Health (2021 and 2022), we estimated the prevalence of having a mental disorder and investigated factors associated with young children not receiving mental health care when needed. All analyses were adjusted for survey weights to account for the complex sampling design and nonresponse biases in generating nationally representative estimates.
Results: In 2021 and 2022, 19.0% of US children aged 2 to 8 years had 1 or more mental disorders. Of these children, 9.1% reported not receiving any needed health care in the previous 12 months, and of these, 45.8% reported not receiving mental health services when needed. The primary reasons for not receiving needed health care were problems getting an appointment (72.1%), issues related to cost (39.3%), and services needed not being available in the area (38.5%). Poor experiences with health care providers were consistently associated with not receiving needed mental health services among children with mental disorders.
Conclusion: Our findings suggest a strong link between health care factors and not receiving needed mental health services among US children with a mental disorder in early childhood. In addition to increasing the availability of mental health services and expanding health insurance coverage, future public health efforts should prioritize enhancing patients' experiences with health care providers.
{"title":"Factors Associated With Not Receiving Mental Health Services Among Children With A Mental Disorder in Early Childhood in the United States, 2021-2022.","authors":"Julie Fang Meng, Eileen Wiznitzer","doi":"10.5888/pcd21.240126","DOIUrl":"10.5888/pcd21.240126","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Many mental disorders begin in early childhood. Without timely treatment, mental disorders experienced by young children can impair their learning ability and relationships with others, causing lifelong complications. However, not all children with a mental disorder in early childhood receive treatment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using data collected from 46,424 children aged 2 to 8 years in the 2 most recent cycles of the National Survey of Children's Health (2021 and 2022), we estimated the prevalence of having a mental disorder and investigated factors associated with young children not receiving mental health care when needed. All analyses were adjusted for survey weights to account for the complex sampling design and nonresponse biases in generating nationally representative estimates.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In 2021 and 2022, 19.0% of US children aged 2 to 8 years had 1 or more mental disorders. Of these children, 9.1% reported not receiving any needed health care in the previous 12 months, and of these, 45.8% reported not receiving mental health services when needed. The primary reasons for not receiving needed health care were problems getting an appointment (72.1%), issues related to cost (39.3%), and services needed not being available in the area (38.5%). Poor experiences with health care providers were consistently associated with not receiving needed mental health services among children with mental disorders.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our findings suggest a strong link between health care factors and not receiving needed mental health services among US children with a mental disorder in early childhood. In addition to increasing the availability of mental health services and expanding health insurance coverage, future public health efforts should prioritize enhancing patients' experiences with health care providers.</p>","PeriodicalId":51273,"journal":{"name":"Preventing Chronic Disease","volume":"21 ","pages":"E79"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4,"publicationDate":"2024-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11506048/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142401827","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Derek Liuzzo, Nancy Fell, Gregory Heath, Preeti Raghavan, David Levine
Introduction: Stroke, a leading cause of illness, death, and long-term disability in the US, presents with significant disparities across the country, most notably in southeastern states comprising the "Stroke Belt." This study intended to identify differences between Stroke Belt states (SBS) and non-Stroke Belt states (NSBS) in terms of prevalence of stroke, sociodemographic and behavioral risk factors, and health-related quality of life (HRQOL).
Methods: We analyzed data from the 2019 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System to compare demographic characteristics, risk factors, physical activity adherence, functional independence, and HRQOL among stroke survivors in SBS and NSBS.
Results: Of 18,745 stroke survivors, 4,272 were from SBS and 14,473 were from NSBS. Stroke was more prevalent in SBS (odds ratio [OR] = 1.39; 95% CI, 1.35-1.44; P < .001), with significant differences by age, sex, and race and ethnicity, except for Hispanic ethnicity. Selected stroke risk factors were more common in every category in SBS. Stroke survivors in SBS were less likely to meet physical activity guidelines for aerobic (OR = 0.77; 95% CI, 0.69-0.86; P < .001) and aerobic and strengthening combined (OR = 0.77; 95% CI, 0.70-0.86; P < .001) activities. Stroke survivors in SBS were more likely to not meet either physical activity guideline (OR = 1.31; 95% CI, 1.22-1.41; P < .001).
Conclusions: Living in SBS significantly increased the odds of stroke occurrence. Stroke survivors from SBS reported lower HRQOL and insufficient physical activity as well as lower functional independence. Specific strategies are needed for residents of SBS, with a focus on policies and primary and secondary prevention practices across healthcare professions.
导言:脑卒中是导致美国人患病、死亡和长期残疾的主要原因之一,但在全国范围内,尤其是在构成 "脑卒中带 "的东南部各州,脑卒中的发病率存在显著差异。本研究旨在确定 "中风带 "各州(SBS)与非 "中风带 "各州(NSBS)在中风患病率、社会人口和行为风险因素以及健康相关生活质量(HRQOL)方面的差异:我们分析了 2019 年行为风险因素监测系统的数据,比较了 SBS 和 NSBS 中风幸存者的人口统计学特征、风险因素、体育锻炼坚持率、功能独立性和 HRQOL:在 18,745 名中风幸存者中,4,272 人来自 SBS,14,473 人来自 NSBS。中风在 SBS 更为常见(几率比 [OR] = 1.39;95% CI,1.35-1.44;P < .001),除西班牙裔外,不同年龄、性别、种族和民族的中风发生率差异显著。在 SBS 的每个类别中,选定的卒中风险因素都更为常见。SBS 中风幸存者达到有氧运动(OR = 0.77;95% CI,0.69-0.86;P < .001)和有氧运动与强化运动(OR = 0.77;95% CI,0.70-0.86;P < .001)体育活动指南要求的可能性较低。结论:生活在SBS地区的中风幸存者更有可能不符合任何一项体育活动指南(OR = 1.31; 95% CI, 1.22-1.41; P < .001):结论:生活在 SBS 会明显增加中风发生的几率。结论:居住在 SBS 的中风幸存者发生中风的几率明显增加,SBS 的中风幸存者报告的 HRQOL 较低、体力活动不足以及功能独立性较低。需要针对 SBS 居民制定具体的策略,重点关注各医疗保健专业的政策及一级和二级预防实践。
{"title":"Behavioral Risk Profiles of Stroke Survivors Among US Adults: Geographic Differences Between Stroke Belt and Non-Stroke Belt States.","authors":"Derek Liuzzo, Nancy Fell, Gregory Heath, Preeti Raghavan, David Levine","doi":"10.5888/pcd21.240113","DOIUrl":"10.5888/pcd21.240113","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Stroke, a leading cause of illness, death, and long-term disability in the US, presents with significant disparities across the country, most notably in southeastern states comprising the \"Stroke Belt.\" This study intended to identify differences between Stroke Belt states (SBS) and non-Stroke Belt states (NSBS) in terms of prevalence of stroke, sociodemographic and behavioral risk factors, and health-related quality of life (HRQOL).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed data from the 2019 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System to compare demographic characteristics, risk factors, physical activity adherence, functional independence, and HRQOL among stroke survivors in SBS and NSBS.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 18,745 stroke survivors, 4,272 were from SBS and 14,473 were from NSBS. Stroke was more prevalent in SBS (odds ratio [OR] = 1.39; 95% CI, 1.35-1.44; P < .001), with significant differences by age, sex, and race and ethnicity, except for Hispanic ethnicity. Selected stroke risk factors were more common in every category in SBS. Stroke survivors in SBS were less likely to meet physical activity guidelines for aerobic (OR = 0.77; 95% CI, 0.69-0.86; P < .001) and aerobic and strengthening combined (OR = 0.77; 95% CI, 0.70-0.86; P < .001) activities. Stroke survivors in SBS were more likely to not meet either physical activity guideline (OR = 1.31; 95% CI, 1.22-1.41; P < .001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Living in SBS significantly increased the odds of stroke occurrence. Stroke survivors from SBS reported lower HRQOL and insufficient physical activity as well as lower functional independence. Specific strategies are needed for residents of SBS, with a focus on policies and primary and secondary prevention practices across healthcare professions.</p>","PeriodicalId":51273,"journal":{"name":"Preventing Chronic Disease","volume":"21 ","pages":"E77"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4,"publicationDate":"2024-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11451572/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142373482","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Lisa J Heaton, Morgan Santoro, Tamanna Tiwari, Rebecca Preston, Kelly Schroeder, Cameron L Randall, Adrianna Sonnek, Eric P Tranby
Introduction: Mental health conditions and poor oral health outcomes share bidirectional links, and both are linked to factors related to socioeconomic position (SEP). We used nationally representative survey data to describe the complex interplay of SEP, mental health, oral health behaviors, dental treatment seeking, and oral health.
Methods: We used data from the 2022 State of Oral Health Equity in America survey, which collects data from US adults on prior depression diagnosis and current depressive symptoms via the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 and demographic characteristics (age, sex/gender, race, ethnicity), SEP (education, income, employment, home ownership, dental insurance), oral health behaviors (brushing and flossing frequency), dental treatment seeking (time since last visit, plans for visit in the coming year), and self-rated oral health (feeling self-conscious due to poor oral health, having symptoms of poor oral health). We used structural equation modeling to identify latent variables and fit the path analytic models.
Results: In the total sample (N = 5,682), SEP was significantly associated with dental treatment seeking (standardized parameter estimate [SE] = 0.55 [0.05]), oral health behaviors (standardized parameter estimate [SE] = 0.34 [0.04]), and mental health (standardized parameter estimate [SE] = 0.59 [0.05]). These factors, in turn, were significantly associated with self-rated oral health (estimates ranging from 0.20 to 0.54, SEs ranging from 0.04 to 0.05).
Conclusion: SEP, which involves several major social determinants of health, is directly associated with mental health and indirectly associated with self-rated oral health status, with mental health modifying the relationship between SEP and self-rated oral health. Findings emphasize the need to integrate medical, dental, and behavioral health with the goal of providing comprehensive person-centered care.
{"title":"Mental Health, Socioeconomic Position, and Oral Health: A Path Analysis.","authors":"Lisa J Heaton, Morgan Santoro, Tamanna Tiwari, Rebecca Preston, Kelly Schroeder, Cameron L Randall, Adrianna Sonnek, Eric P Tranby","doi":"10.5888/pcd21.240097","DOIUrl":"10.5888/pcd21.240097","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Mental health conditions and poor oral health outcomes share bidirectional links, and both are linked to factors related to socioeconomic position (SEP). We used nationally representative survey data to describe the complex interplay of SEP, mental health, oral health behaviors, dental treatment seeking, and oral health.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used data from the 2022 State of Oral Health Equity in America survey, which collects data from US adults on prior depression diagnosis and current depressive symptoms via the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 and demographic characteristics (age, sex/gender, race, ethnicity), SEP (education, income, employment, home ownership, dental insurance), oral health behaviors (brushing and flossing frequency), dental treatment seeking (time since last visit, plans for visit in the coming year), and self-rated oral health (feeling self-conscious due to poor oral health, having symptoms of poor oral health). We used structural equation modeling to identify latent variables and fit the path analytic models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the total sample (N = 5,682), SEP was significantly associated with dental treatment seeking (standardized parameter estimate [SE] = 0.55 [0.05]), oral health behaviors (standardized parameter estimate [SE] = 0.34 [0.04]), and mental health (standardized parameter estimate [SE] = 0.59 [0.05]). These factors, in turn, were significantly associated with self-rated oral health (estimates ranging from 0.20 to 0.54, SEs ranging from 0.04 to 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>SEP, which involves several major social determinants of health, is directly associated with mental health and indirectly associated with self-rated oral health status, with mental health modifying the relationship between SEP and self-rated oral health. Findings emphasize the need to integrate medical, dental, and behavioral health with the goal of providing comprehensive person-centered care.</p>","PeriodicalId":51273,"journal":{"name":"Preventing Chronic Disease","volume":"21 ","pages":"E76"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4,"publicationDate":"2024-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11451565/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142373483","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Steele Valenzuela, Katherine D Peak, Nathalie Huguet, Miguel Marino, Teresa D Schmidt, Robert Voss, Ana R Quiñones, Corey Nagel
Introduction: Multimorbidity - having 2 or more chronic diseases - is a national public health concern that entails burdensome and costly care for patients, their families, and public health programs. Adults residing in socially deprived areas often have limited access to social and material resources. They also experience a greater multimorbidity burden.
Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort analysis of electronic health record (EHR) data from 678 community-based health centers (CHCs) in 27 states from the Accelerating Data Value Across a National Community Health Center (ADVANCE) Network, a clinical research network, from 2012-2019. We used mixed-effects Poisson regression to examine the relationship of area-level social deprivation (eg, educational attainment, household income, unemployment) to chronic disease accumulation among a sample of patients aged 45 years or older (N = 816,921) residing across 9,362 zip code tabulation areas and receiving care in safety-net health organizations.
Results: We observed high rates of chronic disease among this national sample. Prevalence of multimorbidity varied considerably by geographic location, both within and between states. People in more socially deprived areas with Social Deprivation Index (SDI) scores in quartiles 2, 3, and 4 had greater initial chronic disease counts - 17.1%, 17.7%, and 18.0%, respectively - but a slower rate of accumulation compared with people in the least-deprived quartile. Our findings were consistent for models of the composite SDI and those evaluating disaggregated measures of area-level educational attainment, household income, and unemployment.
Conclusion: Social factors play an important role in the development and progression of multimorbidity, which suggests that an assessment and understanding of area-level social deprivation is necessary for developing public health strategies to address multimorbidity.
简介多病患者--患有两种或两种以上慢性疾病--是一个全国性的公共卫生问题,给患者及其家庭和公共卫生计划带来了沉重的负担和昂贵的医疗费用。居住在社会贫困地区的成年人通常很难获得社会和物质资源。他们的多病负担也更重:我们对来自 27 个州的 678 家社区卫生中心(CHC)的电子健康记录(EHR)数据进行了回顾性队列分析,这些数据来自临床研究网络 "全国社区卫生中心数据价值加速(ADVANCE)网络"(Accelerating Data Value Across a National Community Health Center (ADVANCE) Network),时间跨度为 2012-2019 年。我们使用混合效应泊松回归法研究了居住在9362个邮政编码表地区并在安全网医疗机构接受治疗的45岁或以上患者样本(N = 816,921)中地区级社会贫困(如教育程度、家庭收入、失业率)与慢性病累积的关系:结果:我们观察到全国样本中的慢性病患病率很高。在州内和州与州之间,多重疾病的发病率因地理位置的不同而有很大差异。在社会贫困程度较高的地区,社会贫困指数(SDI)得分处于第 2、3 和 4 分位的人群的初始慢性病患病率较高,分别为 17.1%、17.7% 和 18.0%,但与最贫困的四分位人群相比,慢性病的累积速度较慢。我们的研究结果与综合 SDI 模型以及评估地区教育程度、家庭收入和失业率的分类模型一致:结论:社会因素在多病症的发生和发展过程中起着重要作用,这表明要制定公共卫生策略来解决多病症问题,就必须评估和了解地区一级的社会贫困状况。
{"title":"Social Deprivation and Multimorbidity Among Community-Based Health Center Patients in the United States.","authors":"Steele Valenzuela, Katherine D Peak, Nathalie Huguet, Miguel Marino, Teresa D Schmidt, Robert Voss, Ana R Quiñones, Corey Nagel","doi":"10.5888/pcd21.240060","DOIUrl":"10.5888/pcd21.240060","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Multimorbidity - having 2 or more chronic diseases - is a national public health concern that entails burdensome and costly care for patients, their families, and public health programs. Adults residing in socially deprived areas often have limited access to social and material resources. They also experience a greater multimorbidity burden.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective cohort analysis of electronic health record (EHR) data from 678 community-based health centers (CHCs) in 27 states from the Accelerating Data Value Across a National Community Health Center (ADVANCE) Network, a clinical research network, from 2012-2019. We used mixed-effects Poisson regression to examine the relationship of area-level social deprivation (eg, educational attainment, household income, unemployment) to chronic disease accumulation among a sample of patients aged 45 years or older (N = 816,921) residing across 9,362 zip code tabulation areas and receiving care in safety-net health organizations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We observed high rates of chronic disease among this national sample. Prevalence of multimorbidity varied considerably by geographic location, both within and between states. People in more socially deprived areas with Social Deprivation Index (SDI) scores in quartiles 2, 3, and 4 had greater initial chronic disease counts - 17.1%, 17.7%, and 18.0%, respectively - but a slower rate of accumulation compared with people in the least-deprived quartile. Our findings were consistent for models of the composite SDI and those evaluating disaggregated measures of area-level educational attainment, household income, and unemployment.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Social factors play an important role in the development and progression of multimorbidity, which suggests that an assessment and understanding of area-level social deprivation is necessary for developing public health strategies to address multimorbidity.</p>","PeriodicalId":51273,"journal":{"name":"Preventing Chronic Disease","volume":"21 ","pages":"E75"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4,"publicationDate":"2024-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11451564/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142332023","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Introduction: Hospital readmissions is an important public health problem that US hospitals are responsible for reducing. One strategy for preventing readmissions is to schedule an outpatient follow-up visit before discharge. The objective of this study was to determine whether outpatient follow-up visits are an effective method to reduce 30-day all-cause readmissions for patients discharged from US hospitals with heart failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), acute myocardial infarction (AMI), or stroke.
Methods: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to identify relevant articles published from 2013 through 2023. We searched PubMed, CINAHL, and Cochrane. Eligible studies were those that assessed the effect of postdischarge outpatient follow-up visits on 30-day all-cause readmission. We used random effect meta-analyses to generate pooled adjusted effect estimates and 95% CIs.
Results: We initially identified 2,256 articles. Of these, 32 articles underwent full-text review and 15 met inclusion criteria. Seven studies addressed heart failure, 3 COPD, 2 AMI, and 3 stroke. Ten articles provided sufficient information for meta-analysis. The pooled adjusted effect measure was 0.79 (95% CI, 0.69-0.91), indicating that outpatient follow-up visits were associated with a 21% lower risk of readmission. However, we found a high degree of between-study heterogeneity (Q = 122.78; P < .001; I2 = 92.7%). Subgroup analyses indicated that study quality, disease condition, and particularly whether a time-dependent analysis method was used, explained much of the heterogeneity.
Conclusion: Outpatient follow-up visits are a potentially effective way to reduce 30-day all-cause readmissions for patients discharged with heart failure or stroke, but evidence of benefit was lacking for COPD and we found no studies for assessing AMI. Our results emphasize the importance of study quality.
{"title":"Outpatient Follow-Up Visits to Reduce 30-Day All-Cause Readmissions for Heart Failure, COPD, Myocardial Infarction, and Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Dylan J Bilicki, Mathew J Reeves","doi":"10.5888/pcd21.240138","DOIUrl":"10.5888/pcd21.240138","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Hospital readmissions is an important public health problem that US hospitals are responsible for reducing. One strategy for preventing readmissions is to schedule an outpatient follow-up visit before discharge. The objective of this study was to determine whether outpatient follow-up visits are an effective method to reduce 30-day all-cause readmissions for patients discharged from US hospitals with heart failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), acute myocardial infarction (AMI), or stroke.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to identify relevant articles published from 2013 through 2023. We searched PubMed, CINAHL, and Cochrane. Eligible studies were those that assessed the effect of postdischarge outpatient follow-up visits on 30-day all-cause readmission. We used random effect meta-analyses to generate pooled adjusted effect estimates and 95% CIs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We initially identified 2,256 articles. Of these, 32 articles underwent full-text review and 15 met inclusion criteria. Seven studies addressed heart failure, 3 COPD, 2 AMI, and 3 stroke. Ten articles provided sufficient information for meta-analysis. The pooled adjusted effect measure was 0.79 (95% CI, 0.69-0.91), indicating that outpatient follow-up visits were associated with a 21% lower risk of readmission. However, we found a high degree of between-study heterogeneity (Q = 122.78; P < .001; I<sup>2</sup> = 92.7%). Subgroup analyses indicated that study quality, disease condition, and particularly whether a time-dependent analysis method was used, explained much of the heterogeneity.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Outpatient follow-up visits are a potentially effective way to reduce 30-day all-cause readmissions for patients discharged with heart failure or stroke, but evidence of benefit was lacking for COPD and we found no studies for assessing AMI. Our results emphasize the importance of study quality.</p>","PeriodicalId":51273,"journal":{"name":"Preventing Chronic Disease","volume":"21 ","pages":"E74"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4,"publicationDate":"2024-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11451567/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142332022","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Alisha A Etheredge, Carlene Graham, Maureen Wilce, Joy Hsu, Scott A Damon, Josephine Malilay, Henry Falk, Kanta Sircar, Hailay Teklehaimanot, Erik R Svendsen
{"title":"CDC's National Asthma Control Program: Looking Back with an Eye Toward the Future.","authors":"Alisha A Etheredge, Carlene Graham, Maureen Wilce, Joy Hsu, Scott A Damon, Josephine Malilay, Henry Falk, Kanta Sircar, Hailay Teklehaimanot, Erik R Svendsen","doi":"10.5888/pcd21.240051","DOIUrl":"10.5888/pcd21.240051","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":51273,"journal":{"name":"Preventing Chronic Disease","volume":"21 ","pages":"E72"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4,"publicationDate":"2024-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11451566/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142300303","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Maria C Mirabelli, Hailay Teklehaimanot, Tyra Bryant-Stephens
{"title":"CDC's National Asthma Control Program: Public Health Actions to Reduce the Burden of Asthma.","authors":"Maria C Mirabelli, Hailay Teklehaimanot, Tyra Bryant-Stephens","doi":"10.5888/pcd21.240344","DOIUrl":"10.5888/pcd21.240344","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":51273,"journal":{"name":"Preventing Chronic Disease","volume":"21 ","pages":"E73"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4,"publicationDate":"2024-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11451571/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142300304","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Sophie Binney, W Dana Flanders, Kanta Sircar, Osatohamwen Idubor
Introduction: Some racial and ethnic minority communities have long faced a higher asthma burden than non-Hispanic White communities. Prior research on racial and ethnic pediatric asthma disparities found stable or increasing disparities, but more recent data allow for updated analysis of these trends.
Methods: Using 2012-2020 National Inpatient Sample data, we estimated the number of pediatric asthma hospitalizations by sex, age, and race and ethnicity. We converted these estimates into rates using data from the US Census Bureau and then conducted meta-regression to assess changes over time. Because the analysis spanned a 2015 change in diagnostic coding, we performed separate analyses for periods before and after the change. We also excluded 2020 data from the regression analysis.
Results: The number of pediatric asthma hospitalizations decreased over the analysis period. Non-Hispanic Black children had the highest prevalence (range, 9.8-36.7 hospitalizations per 10,000 children), whereas prevalence was lowest among non-Hispanic White children (range, 2.2-9.4 hospitalizations per 10,000 children). Although some evidence suggests that race-specific trends varied modestly across groups, results overall were consistent with a similar rate of decrease across all groups (2012-2015, slope = -0.83 [95% CI, -1.14 to -0.52]; 2016-2019, slope = -0.35 [95% CI, -0.58 to -0.12]).
Conclusion: Non-Hispanic Black children remain disproportionately burdened by asthma-related hospitalizations. Although the prevalence of asthma hospitalization is decreasing among all racial and ethnic groups, the rates of decline are similar across groups. Therefore, previously identified disparities persist. Interventions that consider the specific needs of members of disproportionately affected groups may reduce these disparities.
{"title":"Trends in US Pediatric Asthma Hospitalizations, by Race and Ethnicity, 2012-2020.","authors":"Sophie Binney, W Dana Flanders, Kanta Sircar, Osatohamwen Idubor","doi":"10.5888/pcd21.240049","DOIUrl":"10.5888/pcd21.240049","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Some racial and ethnic minority communities have long faced a higher asthma burden than non-Hispanic White communities. Prior research on racial and ethnic pediatric asthma disparities found stable or increasing disparities, but more recent data allow for updated analysis of these trends.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using 2012-2020 National Inpatient Sample data, we estimated the number of pediatric asthma hospitalizations by sex, age, and race and ethnicity. We converted these estimates into rates using data from the US Census Bureau and then conducted meta-regression to assess changes over time. Because the analysis spanned a 2015 change in diagnostic coding, we performed separate analyses for periods before and after the change. We also excluded 2020 data from the regression analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The number of pediatric asthma hospitalizations decreased over the analysis period. Non-Hispanic Black children had the highest prevalence (range, 9.8-36.7 hospitalizations per 10,000 children), whereas prevalence was lowest among non-Hispanic White children (range, 2.2-9.4 hospitalizations per 10,000 children). Although some evidence suggests that race-specific trends varied modestly across groups, results overall were consistent with a similar rate of decrease across all groups (2012-2015, slope = -0.83 [95% CI, -1.14 to -0.52]; 2016-2019, slope = -0.35 [95% CI, -0.58 to -0.12]).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Non-Hispanic Black children remain disproportionately burdened by asthma-related hospitalizations. Although the prevalence of asthma hospitalization is decreasing among all racial and ethnic groups, the rates of decline are similar across groups. Therefore, previously identified disparities persist. Interventions that consider the specific needs of members of disproportionately affected groups may reduce these disparities.</p>","PeriodicalId":51273,"journal":{"name":"Preventing Chronic Disease","volume":"21 ","pages":"E71"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4,"publicationDate":"2024-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11451570/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142300305","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Cara F Ruggiero,Man Luo,Rachel M Zack,James P Marriott,Catherine Lynn,Daniel Taitelbaum,Paige Palley,Aprylle M Wallace,Norbert Wilson,Angela Odoms-Young,Lauren Fiechtner
IntroductionFood insecurity is defined as inconsistent access to enough food to meet nutritional needs. Discrimination is associated with food insecurity and poor health, especially among racial and ethnic minoritized and sexual or gender minoritized groups. We examined the demographic associations of perceived everyday discrimination and food pantry discrimination in Massachusetts.MethodsFrom December 2021 through February 2022, The Greater Boston Food Bank conducted a cross-sectional, statewide survey of Massachusetts adults. Of the 3,085 respondents, 702 were food pantry clients for whom complete data on food security were available; we analyzed data from this subset of respondents. We used the validated 10-item Everyday Discrimination Scale to measure perceived everyday discrimination and a 10-item modified version of the Everyday Discrimination Scale to measure perceived discrimination at food pantries. Logistic regression adjusted for race and ethnicity, age, gender identity, sexual orientation, having children in the household, annual household income, and household size assessed demographic associations of perceived everyday discrimination and discrimination at food pantries.ResultsFood pantry clients identifying as LGBTQ+ were more likely than those identifying as non-LGBTQ+ to report perceived everyday discrimination (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 2.44; 95% CI, 1.24-4.79). Clients identifying as Hispanic (AOR = 1.83, 95% CI, 1.13-2.96) were more likely than clients identifying as non-Hispanic White to report perceived discrimination at food pantries.ConclusionTo equitably reach and serve households with food insecurity, food banks and pantries need to understand experiences of discrimination and unconscious bias to develop programs, policies, and practices to address discrimination and create more inclusive interventions for food assistance.
{"title":"Perceived Discrimination Among Food Pantry Clients in Massachusetts.","authors":"Cara F Ruggiero,Man Luo,Rachel M Zack,James P Marriott,Catherine Lynn,Daniel Taitelbaum,Paige Palley,Aprylle M Wallace,Norbert Wilson,Angela Odoms-Young,Lauren Fiechtner","doi":"10.5888/pcd21.240009","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5888/pcd21.240009","url":null,"abstract":"IntroductionFood insecurity is defined as inconsistent access to enough food to meet nutritional needs. Discrimination is associated with food insecurity and poor health, especially among racial and ethnic minoritized and sexual or gender minoritized groups. We examined the demographic associations of perceived everyday discrimination and food pantry discrimination in Massachusetts.MethodsFrom December 2021 through February 2022, The Greater Boston Food Bank conducted a cross-sectional, statewide survey of Massachusetts adults. Of the 3,085 respondents, 702 were food pantry clients for whom complete data on food security were available; we analyzed data from this subset of respondents. We used the validated 10-item Everyday Discrimination Scale to measure perceived everyday discrimination and a 10-item modified version of the Everyday Discrimination Scale to measure perceived discrimination at food pantries. Logistic regression adjusted for race and ethnicity, age, gender identity, sexual orientation, having children in the household, annual household income, and household size assessed demographic associations of perceived everyday discrimination and discrimination at food pantries.ResultsFood pantry clients identifying as LGBTQ+ were more likely than those identifying as non-LGBTQ+ to report perceived everyday discrimination (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 2.44; 95% CI, 1.24-4.79). Clients identifying as Hispanic (AOR = 1.83, 95% CI, 1.13-2.96) were more likely than clients identifying as non-Hispanic White to report perceived discrimination at food pantries.ConclusionTo equitably reach and serve households with food insecurity, food banks and pantries need to understand experiences of discrimination and unconscious bias to develop programs, policies, and practices to address discrimination and create more inclusive interventions for food assistance.","PeriodicalId":51273,"journal":{"name":"Preventing Chronic Disease","volume":"6 1","pages":"E70"},"PeriodicalIF":5.5,"publicationDate":"2024-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142253337","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}