Clinical Advances in Hematology & Oncology最新文献

The standard treatment of patients with advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer has not significantly changed over the past few decades, reflecting a major unmet clinical need. Fortunately, the arrival of immune checkpoint inhibition is rapidly changing this dismal scenario. This review discusses the most recent results from clinical trials evaluating the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors, either as monotherapy or in combination therapy, in both the post-platinum and frontline settings. Additionally, a section is devoted to the future clinical development of immune checkpoint inhibitors in advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer.

Despite significantly improving outcomes in patients with B-cell malignancies, covalent Bruton tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitors are limited by toxicities and the development of resistance. Some toxicities can be life-threatening, such as cardiotoxicity. These toxicities result from off-target effects of covalent BTK inhibitors and frequently lead to dose reductions and discontinuations of the drug. Noncovalent BTK inhibitors bind BTK in a unique fashion and, to date, have demonstrated an excellent safety profile as well as efficacy against a variety of B-cell malignancies. In addition, noncovalent BTK inhibitors have, for the first time, demonstrated efficacy in patients who progressed on other BTK inhibitors. Long-term data and comparative studies are needed to further investigate their efficacy and role in the landscape covalent BTK Inhibitors.

Kirsten rat sarcoma virus (KRAS) is the most frequently mutated oncogene in human cancers, particularly in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), where mutations are present in 32% of lung adenocarcinoma and 4% of squamous cell lung cancer. The most common KRAS variant is KRAS G12C, which accounts for nearly 40% of all KRAS mutations. Although it is the most common oncogenic driver in NSCLC, KRAS was considered a "nondruggable target" until recently, owing to the lack of any progress in developing targeted therapies for this oncogene. With the recent development and approval of selective KRAS G12C inhibitors such as sotorasib and adagrasib for the treatment of advanced or metastatic NSCLC in the second-line setting and beyond, the standard of care for managing these tumors has undergone a significant change. Mechanisms of resistance to KRAS G12C inhibitors are highly heterogeneous, including both on-target and off-target resistance as well as morphologic switching, thus limiting the activity of these drugs when used as monotherapy. New-generation inhibitors and different combination strategies are being developed in early-phase trials to overcome or delay the onset of resistance as well as to target non-G12C mutations. Owing to the biological heterogeneity of KRAS-mutant NSCLC, treatment will likely need to be individualized based on factors such as co-occurring mutations.

The treatment landscape for BCR/ABL-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs), driven by JAK2, CALR, and MPL mutations, has evolved significantly over the last decade. Recent regulatory approvals in polycythemia vera (PV) include the JAK inhibitor ruxolitinib, and more recently, a novel recombinant interferon alfa-2 (IFN-α) therapeutic agent. Many clinical trials have documented the safety and efficacy of IFN-α therapy in PV and essential thrombocythemia, the classical BCR/ABL-negative MPNs. Used off-label for more than 30 years as a cytoreductive agent, IFN-α therapy promotes significant clinical, hematologic, and molecular responses. In some IFN-α-treated patients, partial or complete reduction of the mutant JAK2 allele burden may lead to a durable measurable residual disease state, owing to the ability of long-term IFN-α therapy to selectively deplete mutant JAK2-harboring hematopoietic stem cells. Pegylated IFN-α forms were developed to improve the drug stability and tolerability of first-generation IFN-α therapeutics. More recently, a novel pegylated IFN-α, ropeginterferon alfa-2b, received approval for PV by the European Medicines Agency and the US Food and Drug Administration in 2019 and 2021, respectively. This article reviews the clinical research and recent advances that led to the first regulatory approval of IFN-α in a BCR/ABL-negative MPN and its future promise as a disease-modifying therapeutic agent.