Pub Date : 2024-10-25DOI: 10.4081/monaldi.2024.3193
Sabah Ahmed Hussein, Hari Kishan Gonuguntla, Sarabon Tahura, Belgundi Preeti, Vishnu G Krishnan, Nitesh Gupta, Ahmed Al-Halfawy, Felix J Herth
Aspiration of scarf pins is a common problem in specific geographical locations where the Muslim population is high, especially in countries like Egypt, Bangladesh, Middle Eastern countries, and certain regions in India. This condition is also referred to as hijab-pin syndrome. We discuss the largest experience of flexible bronchoscopic extraction of aspirated scarf pins from the tracheobronchial tree. A multicenter retrospective observational study was conducted on 146 patients from 4 different centers in Egypt, Bangladesh, India, and Germany. Flexible bronchoscopy was successful in the extraction of aspirated scarf pins in all 146/146 patients with a 100% success rate. 136/146 (93.15%) patients were females, with the most common age group between 12 and 18 years (34.24%). 132/146 (90.4%) remembered the aspiration event before coming to the hospital. Cough was the predominant presenting symptom. (71.22%). In all 146 cases, the foreign body was identified on a standard chest X-ray. The left main bronchus was the most common site of aspiration, 67/146 (45.89%), followed by the right main bronchus, 56/146 (38.35%). 14 patients (9.58%) had a history of unsuccessful attempts to remove by rigid bronchoscopy, and flexible bronchoscopy was successful in these 14 (100%) patients who had a prior unsuccessful attempt to remove. The current series is the largest in literature and demonstrated an excellent success rate in the removal of the aspirated scarf pin.
{"title":"Flexible bronchoscopy-assisted removal of aspirated scarf pins from the tracheobronchial tree: the experience of 146 subjects.","authors":"Sabah Ahmed Hussein, Hari Kishan Gonuguntla, Sarabon Tahura, Belgundi Preeti, Vishnu G Krishnan, Nitesh Gupta, Ahmed Al-Halfawy, Felix J Herth","doi":"10.4081/monaldi.2024.3193","DOIUrl":"10.4081/monaldi.2024.3193","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Aspiration of scarf pins is a common problem in specific geographical locations where the Muslim population is high, especially in countries like Egypt, Bangladesh, Middle Eastern countries, and certain regions in India. This condition is also referred to as hijab-pin syndrome. We discuss the largest experience of flexible bronchoscopic extraction of aspirated scarf pins from the tracheobronchial tree. A multicenter retrospective observational study was conducted on 146 patients from 4 different centers in Egypt, Bangladesh, India, and Germany. Flexible bronchoscopy was successful in the extraction of aspirated scarf pins in all 146/146 patients with a 100% success rate. 136/146 (93.15%) patients were females, with the most common age group between 12 and 18 years (34.24%). 132/146 (90.4%) remembered the aspiration event before coming to the hospital. Cough was the predominant presenting symptom. (71.22%). In all 146 cases, the foreign body was identified on a standard chest X-ray. The left main bronchus was the most common site of aspiration, 67/146 (45.89%), followed by the right main bronchus, 56/146 (38.35%). 14 patients (9.58%) had a history of unsuccessful attempts to remove by rigid bronchoscopy, and flexible bronchoscopy was successful in these 14 (100%) patients who had a prior unsuccessful attempt to remove. The current series is the largest in literature and demonstrated an excellent success rate in the removal of the aspirated scarf pin.</p>","PeriodicalId":51593,"journal":{"name":"Monaldi Archives for Chest Disease","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2024-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142523583","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Lung carcinoma was the ace cause of cancer deaths globally in 2022, with non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) accounting for 81% of the burden. Due to promising tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) trials, NSCLC patients harboring epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) gene mutations are of interest. Our aim was to determine EGFR mutation prevalence in north India and its histologic and demographic correlations. We investigated the frequency of EGFR mutations in 40 patients with histologically confirmed NSCLC using real-time polymerase chain reaction. A 15% mutation frequency was observed in the study sample, involving 32 males and 8 females with a median age of 59 years. Squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) patients had only EXON20 (T790M, exon20 insertion) mutations, while adenocarcinoma patients had mutations in both EXON20 (T790M) and 21 (L858R) with mutation frequencies of 22% and 10%, respectively. 28% of the SCC patients were non-smokers, and 60% of these non-smokers had an EGFR mutation. South Indian and Asian studies have identified EXON19 (19-Del) and EXON21 (L858R) mutations as "common mutations" that account for nearly 80-90% of all mutations and respond well to TKIs. Interestingly, "common mutations" were found seldom in our study population, while the uncommon variants constitute 83% of all mutations, which we assume is due to diverse Indian genetics and ethnicity and co-existing signature mutations that involve the tyrosine kinase domain of EXON20. We suggest future genome-wide association studies to identify plausible genetic polymorphisms responsible for interethnic differences in EGFR mutation, which will contribute to better treatment and prevention of NSCLCs.
{"title":"Common epidermal growth factor receptor mutations in north Indian patients with non-small cell lung carcinoma: evidence from real-time polymerase chain reaction.","authors":"Rakesh Behera, Sheetal Arora, Pranav Ish, Geetika Khanna","doi":"10.4081/monaldi.2024.3202","DOIUrl":"10.4081/monaldi.2024.3202","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Lung carcinoma was the ace cause of cancer deaths globally in 2022, with non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) accounting for 81% of the burden. Due to promising tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) trials, NSCLC patients harboring epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) gene mutations are of interest. Our aim was to determine EGFR mutation prevalence in north India and its histologic and demographic correlations. We investigated the frequency of EGFR mutations in 40 patients with histologically confirmed NSCLC using real-time polymerase chain reaction. A 15% mutation frequency was observed in the study sample, involving 32 males and 8 females with a median age of 59 years. Squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) patients had only EXON20 (T790M, exon20 insertion) mutations, while adenocarcinoma patients had mutations in both EXON20 (T790M) and 21 (L858R) with mutation frequencies of 22% and 10%, respectively. 28% of the SCC patients were non-smokers, and 60% of these non-smokers had an EGFR mutation. South Indian and Asian studies have identified EXON19 (19-Del) and EXON21 (L858R) mutations as \"common mutations\" that account for nearly 80-90% of all mutations and respond well to TKIs. Interestingly, \"common mutations\" were found seldom in our study population, while the uncommon variants constitute 83% of all mutations, which we assume is due to diverse Indian genetics and ethnicity and co-existing signature mutations that involve the tyrosine kinase domain of EXON20. We suggest future genome-wide association studies to identify plausible genetic polymorphisms responsible for interethnic differences in EGFR mutation, which will contribute to better treatment and prevention of NSCLCs.</p>","PeriodicalId":51593,"journal":{"name":"Monaldi Archives for Chest Disease","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2024-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142523581","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-10-24DOI: 10.4081/monaldi.2024.3033
Federico Raimondi, Stefano Centanni, Fabrizio Luppi, Stefano Aliberti, Francesco Blasi, Paola Rogliani, Claudio Micheletto, Marco Contoli, Alessandro Sanduzzi Zamparelli, Marialuisa Bocchino, Paolo Busatto, Luca Novelli, Simone Pappacena, Luca Malandrino, Giorgio Lorini, Greta Cairoli, Fabiano Di Marco
Predictors of outcomes are essential to identifying severe COVID-19 cases and optimizing treatment and care settings. The respiratory rate-oxygenation (ROX) index, originally introduced for predicting the failure of non-invasive support in acute hypoxemic respiratory failure (AHRF), has not been extensively studied over time during hospitalization. This multicenter prospective observational study analyzed COVID-19-related AHRF patients admitted to eight Italian hospitals during the second pandemic wave. The study assessed the ROX index using receiver operator characteristic curves and areas under the curve with 95% confidence intervals to predict treatment failure, defined as endotracheal intubation (ETI) or death. A total of 227 patients (69.2% males) were enrolled, with a median arterial partial pressure of oxygen (PaO2)/fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2) ratio at admission of 248 (interquartile range: 170-295). Nearly one-third (29.5%) required ETI or died during hospitalization. Those who experienced treatment failure were older (median age 70 versus 61 years, p<0.001), more likely to be current or former smokers (8.5% versus 6.4% and 42.4% versus 25.5%, p=0.039), had a higher prevalence of cardiovascular diseases (74.6% versus 46.3%, p<0.001), and had a lower PaO2/FiO2 ratio at presentation (median 229 versus 254, p=0.014). Gender, body mass index, and other comorbidities showed no significant differences. In patients who failed treatment, the ROX index was higher at presentation and worsened sharply by days 3 and 4. Conversely, in patients who survived without requiring ETI, the ROX index remained stable and reduced after 5-6 days. The ROX index's predictive ability improved notably by the third day of hospitalization, with the best cut-off value identified at 8.53 (sensitivity 75%, specificity 68%). Kaplan-Meier curves indicated that a ROX index of 8.53 or lower on days 1, 2, or 3 was associated with a higher risk of treatment failure. Thus, a single ROX index assessment on day 3 is more informative than its variability over time, with values of 8.53 or lower predicting non-invasive respiratory support failure in hospitalized COVID-19 patients.
{"title":"Respiratory rate-oxygenation index on the 3<sup>rd</sup> day is the best predictor of treatment failure in COVID-19 patients.","authors":"Federico Raimondi, Stefano Centanni, Fabrizio Luppi, Stefano Aliberti, Francesco Blasi, Paola Rogliani, Claudio Micheletto, Marco Contoli, Alessandro Sanduzzi Zamparelli, Marialuisa Bocchino, Paolo Busatto, Luca Novelli, Simone Pappacena, Luca Malandrino, Giorgio Lorini, Greta Cairoli, Fabiano Di Marco","doi":"10.4081/monaldi.2024.3033","DOIUrl":"10.4081/monaldi.2024.3033","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Predictors of outcomes are essential to identifying severe COVID-19 cases and optimizing treatment and care settings. The respiratory rate-oxygenation (ROX) index, originally introduced for predicting the failure of non-invasive support in acute hypoxemic respiratory failure (AHRF), has not been extensively studied over time during hospitalization. This multicenter prospective observational study analyzed COVID-19-related AHRF patients admitted to eight Italian hospitals during the second pandemic wave. The study assessed the ROX index using receiver operator characteristic curves and areas under the curve with 95% confidence intervals to predict treatment failure, defined as endotracheal intubation (ETI) or death. A total of 227 patients (69.2% males) were enrolled, with a median arterial partial pressure of oxygen (PaO2)/fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2) ratio at admission of 248 (interquartile range: 170-295). Nearly one-third (29.5%) required ETI or died during hospitalization. Those who experienced treatment failure were older (median age 70 versus 61 years, p<0.001), more likely to be current or former smokers (8.5% versus 6.4% and 42.4% versus 25.5%, p=0.039), had a higher prevalence of cardiovascular diseases (74.6% versus 46.3%, p<0.001), and had a lower PaO2/FiO2 ratio at presentation (median 229 versus 254, p=0.014). Gender, body mass index, and other comorbidities showed no significant differences. In patients who failed treatment, the ROX index was higher at presentation and worsened sharply by days 3 and 4. Conversely, in patients who survived without requiring ETI, the ROX index remained stable and reduced after 5-6 days. The ROX index's predictive ability improved notably by the third day of hospitalization, with the best cut-off value identified at 8.53 (sensitivity 75%, specificity 68%). Kaplan-Meier curves indicated that a ROX index of 8.53 or lower on days 1, 2, or 3 was associated with a higher risk of treatment failure. Thus, a single ROX index assessment on day 3 is more informative than its variability over time, with values of 8.53 or lower predicting non-invasive respiratory support failure in hospitalized COVID-19 patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":51593,"journal":{"name":"Monaldi Archives for Chest Disease","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2024-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142523584","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Asthma is an obstructive lung disease with high prevalence. Symptom control in asthma remains poor despite significant advancements in treatment guidelines and inhalational devices. This is often attributed to inadequate patient adherence to the inhaler technique and insufficient education on its long-term use. Through this study, we aimed to assess the impact of reinforcement of proper inhaler technique on asthma symptom control and quality of life. A prospective cohort of 400 asthma patients using dry powder inhalers and metered dose inhalers was recruited in the outpatient clinic of our hospital. At the time of recruitment, the correctness of inhaler technique usage was assessed, and the pre-test Inhaler Technique Score (ITS) was recorded for each patient. Then, a ten-step inhalation technique was taught through demonstration, and the post-test ITS score was recorded again. This was done for each patient at monthly intervals for 3 months. Along with it, two tailored questionnaires, the Asthma Control Test (ACT) and Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ), were administered at each visit to assess disease control and quality of life. Significant enhancements in inhalation technique were noted from the first to the third visit using the ten-step inhalation usage scores, which improved from 6.91 to 9.87 (out of 10) (p<0.001), paralleled by ACT score increases from 17.06 to 19.37 (out of 25) (p<0.001) from visits one to two, and from 19.37 to 20.52 (out of 25) (p<0.001) from visits two to three, signifying improvement in symptom control. Quality of life similarly improved from 4.45 to 5.12 to 5.45 (out of 7) (p<0.001) across the three visits as assessed by AQLQ. In conclusion, promoting proper inhaler technique through structured education programs is crucial for optimizing long-term asthma management and enhancing patients' quality of life.
{"title":"Evaluation of asthma control after reinforcement of proper inhaler techniques in a tertiary care center in northern India.","authors":"Manav Raj Singh Gill, Sparsh Gupta, Amit Sharma, Pranav Ish, Deepak Pandey","doi":"10.4081/monaldi.2024.3199","DOIUrl":"10.4081/monaldi.2024.3199","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Asthma is an obstructive lung disease with high prevalence. Symptom control in asthma remains poor despite significant advancements in treatment guidelines and inhalational devices. This is often attributed to inadequate patient adherence to the inhaler technique and insufficient education on its long-term use. Through this study, we aimed to assess the impact of reinforcement of proper inhaler technique on asthma symptom control and quality of life. A prospective cohort of 400 asthma patients using dry powder inhalers and metered dose inhalers was recruited in the outpatient clinic of our hospital. At the time of recruitment, the correctness of inhaler technique usage was assessed, and the pre-test Inhaler Technique Score (ITS) was recorded for each patient. Then, a ten-step inhalation technique was taught through demonstration, and the post-test ITS score was recorded again. This was done for each patient at monthly intervals for 3 months. Along with it, two tailored questionnaires, the Asthma Control Test (ACT) and Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ), were administered at each visit to assess disease control and quality of life. Significant enhancements in inhalation technique were noted from the first to the third visit using the ten-step inhalation usage scores, which improved from 6.91 to 9.87 (out of 10) (p<0.001), paralleled by ACT score increases from 17.06 to 19.37 (out of 25) (p<0.001) from visits one to two, and from 19.37 to 20.52 (out of 25) (p<0.001) from visits two to three, signifying improvement in symptom control. Quality of life similarly improved from 4.45 to 5.12 to 5.45 (out of 7) (p<0.001) across the three visits as assessed by AQLQ. In conclusion, promoting proper inhaler technique through structured education programs is crucial for optimizing long-term asthma management and enhancing patients' quality of life.</p>","PeriodicalId":51593,"journal":{"name":"Monaldi Archives for Chest Disease","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2024-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142480436","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
An 18-year-old male presented with syncope during a training break. Post-syncope, he developed effort dyspnea, which he associated with the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine received a week earlier. Electrocardiogram showed T inversion in V1-V3, III, and aVF, while 24-hour Holter monitoring revealed frequent ventricular premature beats. A transthoracic echocardiogram showed severe biventricular dilation and mild left ventricular (LV) dysfunction. Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging confirmed these findings, showing moderate right ventricular (RV) systolic dysfunction with akinesia of the inferior and inferolateral walls. T2 hypersignal in the middle segment of the inferior inferior interventricular septum suggested myocardial edema. Extensive transmural late gadolinium enhancement was noted in the RV and LV walls. An implantable loop recorder was implanted. Three months later, the patient was admitted with palpitations, fever, and a positive SARS-CoV-2 test. Sustained ventricular tachycardia (VT) episodes were documented and managed with amiodarone and β-blockers. Follow-up CMR showed a slight improvement in LV ejection fraction and resolution of edema. A single-chamber implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) was implanted. Genetic testing for arrhythmogenic RV cardiomyopathy (ARVC) was negative, and family screening was normal. Two years later, pre-syncope episodes occurred, and ICD interrogation revealed nonsustained VT. The patient is awaiting VT ablation. This case highlights the diagnostic and therapeutic challenges of ARVC, particularly in differentiating it from myocarditis. The "hot-phase" presentation, vaccine association, and subsequent SARS-CoV-2 infection added complexity. CMR was crucial for diagnosis, and VT management required a combination of medical therapy and invasive procedures.
{"title":"\"Hot phase\" clinical presentation of biventricular arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy: when the perfect electrical storm spontaneously stops.","authors":"Mariana Gomes Tinoco, Margarida Castro, Luísa Pinheiro, Tamara Pereira, Margarida Oliveira, Sílvia Ribeiro, Nuno Ferreira, Olga Azevedo, António Lourenço","doi":"10.4081/monaldi.2024.3086","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4081/monaldi.2024.3086","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>An 18-year-old male presented with syncope during a training break. Post-syncope, he developed effort dyspnea, which he associated with the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine received a week earlier. Electrocardiogram showed T inversion in V1-V3, III, and aVF, while 24-hour Holter monitoring revealed frequent ventricular premature beats. A transthoracic echocardiogram showed severe biventricular dilation and mild left ventricular (LV) dysfunction. Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging confirmed these findings, showing moderate right ventricular (RV) systolic dysfunction with akinesia of the inferior and inferolateral walls. T2 hypersignal in the middle segment of the inferior inferior interventricular septum suggested myocardial edema. Extensive transmural late gadolinium enhancement was noted in the RV and LV walls. An implantable loop recorder was implanted. Three months later, the patient was admitted with palpitations, fever, and a positive SARS-CoV-2 test. Sustained ventricular tachycardia (VT) episodes were documented and managed with amiodarone and β-blockers. Follow-up CMR showed a slight improvement in LV ejection fraction and resolution of edema. A single-chamber implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) was implanted. Genetic testing for arrhythmogenic RV cardiomyopathy (ARVC) was negative, and family screening was normal. Two years later, pre-syncope episodes occurred, and ICD interrogation revealed nonsustained VT. The patient is awaiting VT ablation. This case highlights the diagnostic and therapeutic challenges of ARVC, particularly in differentiating it from myocarditis. The \"hot-phase\" presentation, vaccine association, and subsequent SARS-CoV-2 infection added complexity. CMR was crucial for diagnosis, and VT management required a combination of medical therapy and invasive procedures.</p>","PeriodicalId":51593,"journal":{"name":"Monaldi Archives for Chest Disease","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2024-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142480435","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-10-16DOI: 10.4081/monaldi.2024.3028
Luigi Pinto, Pietro Schino, Michele Bitetto, Ersilia Tedeschi, Michele Maiellari, Giancarlo De Leo, Elena Ludovico, Giovanni Larizza, Franco Mastroianni
Following the onset of the new COVID-19 pandemic, particular attention is paid to the long-term outcomes, especially concerning patients affected by the SARS-CoV-2 virus leading to interstitial pneumonia. The aim of this research is to evaluate the possible evolution over time of interstitial pneumonia into post-inflammatory fibrosing interstitial disease. This research included 42 patients admitted to the COVID ward for SARS-CoV-2 interstitial pneumonia, 10 patients with mild pneumonia and respiratory failure who were treated with O2 only, 32 patients with severe pneumonia in which O2 and non-invasive ventilation were used for respiratory assistance, and 4 patients treated with invasive mechanical ventilation. At 70±30 days, 6, 12, 24, and 36 months after discharge, the cohort of patients carried out the evaluation of inflammation indices, high-resolution computed tomography (CT) chest scans, and functional respiratory tests. The comparative analysis showed that 83.3% of patients had residual parenchymal lung disease at 36-month follow-up, with a significantly higher rate in those with severe pneumonia and more extensive disease on initial CT. Regarding the pulmonary involvement model, patients presented ground-glass opacity or peripheral parenchymal bands, or a combination of them, peri- and intralobular interstitial thickening, which may be representative of fibrotic interstitial lung disease. There is a correlation between the severity of pneumonia, the inflammatory state, the need to increase respiratory support, and the quantity and persistence of CT-related lesions. Reductions in respiratory functions and exercise capacity were observed, the latter more pronounced in patients (24%) who had contracted severe pneumonia and required ventilatory support.Pulmonary outcomes from SARS-CoV-2 respiratory infections show a wide range of radiological findings, from complete recovery to stable outcomes of thickening and distortion of the interstitial architecture. From a functional point of view, there is an impairment of the alveolar-capillary diffusion capacity and, in cases who had contracted severe pneumonia, desaturation and reduced exercise tolerance in 24% of cases at a 36-month follow-up.
{"title":"Fibrotic outcomes from SARS-CoV-2 virus interstitial pneumonia.","authors":"Luigi Pinto, Pietro Schino, Michele Bitetto, Ersilia Tedeschi, Michele Maiellari, Giancarlo De Leo, Elena Ludovico, Giovanni Larizza, Franco Mastroianni","doi":"10.4081/monaldi.2024.3028","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4081/monaldi.2024.3028","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Following the onset of the new COVID-19 pandemic, particular attention is paid to the long-term outcomes, especially concerning patients affected by the SARS-CoV-2 virus leading to interstitial pneumonia. The aim of this research is to evaluate the possible evolution over time of interstitial pneumonia into post-inflammatory fibrosing interstitial disease. This research included 42 patients admitted to the COVID ward for SARS-CoV-2 interstitial pneumonia, 10 patients with mild pneumonia and respiratory failure who were treated with O2 only, 32 patients with severe pneumonia in which O2 and non-invasive ventilation were used for respiratory assistance, and 4 patients treated with invasive mechanical ventilation. At 70±30 days, 6, 12, 24, and 36 months after discharge, the cohort of patients carried out the evaluation of inflammation indices, high-resolution computed tomography (CT) chest scans, and functional respiratory tests. The comparative analysis showed that 83.3% of patients had residual parenchymal lung disease at 36-month follow-up, with a significantly higher rate in those with severe pneumonia and more extensive disease on initial CT. Regarding the pulmonary involvement model, patients presented ground-glass opacity or peripheral parenchymal bands, or a combination of them, peri- and intralobular interstitial thickening, which may be representative of fibrotic interstitial lung disease. There is a correlation between the severity of pneumonia, the inflammatory state, the need to increase respiratory support, and the quantity and persistence of CT-related lesions. Reductions in respiratory functions and exercise capacity were observed, the latter more pronounced in patients (24%) who had contracted severe pneumonia and required ventilatory support.Pulmonary outcomes from SARS-CoV-2 respiratory infections show a wide range of radiological findings, from complete recovery to stable outcomes of thickening and distortion of the interstitial architecture. From a functional point of view, there is an impairment of the alveolar-capillary diffusion capacity and, in cases who had contracted severe pneumonia, desaturation and reduced exercise tolerance in 24% of cases at a 36-month follow-up.</p>","PeriodicalId":51593,"journal":{"name":"Monaldi Archives for Chest Disease","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2024-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142480437","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
<p><p>Tuberculosis (TB) is associated with psychological distress, poor coping, deterioration in health-related quality of life (HRQL), and stigma. However, these issues have never received sufficient attention as a part of routine care. The healthcare workers and physicians of primary contact are not sensitized to use discrete screening questionnaires to identify and address these issues. A longitudinal study was hence conducted in the Department of Pulmonary Medicine in collaboration with the Department of Psychiatry. 75 microbiologically confirmed 'new' pulmonary TB patients were enrolled. Socio-demographic and clinical details were noted. The patients were then evaluated for psychological distress using the General Health Questionnaire-12-Hindi version (GHQ-12) and Patient Distress Thermometer (PDT); coping strategies using the Coping Strategy Check List-Hindi Version (CSCL); HRQL using the World Health Organization Quality of Life-Brief-Hindi version (WHOQOL-Bref), and stigma using the Explanatory Model Interview Catalogue-affected persons Stigma Scale (EMIC-SS), at the start of treatment. Those having a GHQ-12 score ≥3 were labeled as 'screen positive' for psychological distress and referred to a consultant psychiatrist for detailed psychological assessment. Treatment was given by the psychiatrist if diagnosed with a psychiatric illness. All those without the diagnosis of a psychiatric illness were counseled by a pulmonologist. All patients were called for a follow-up visit and repeat assessments on the 15th day at the end of the intensive phase, using the same instruments employed at baseline. The patients already on treatment by the psychiatrist were again evaluated for their psychiatric illness. 32 (42.7%) patients had psychological distress (GHQ-12≥3) at baseline. 20 of them (26.7%) were diagnosed with a psychiatric illness. However, only 2 (2.7%) patients had psychological distress and psychiatric illness at follow-up (p<0.001). Mean scores of GHQ-12, PDT, CSCL, WHOQOL-Bref-26, and EMIC-SS at baseline were 3.000±1.9590, 2.333±1.2980, 3.480±2.2017, 311.63±30.201 and 5.267±1.8478, respectively. All the scores improved significantly at follow-up (p<0.001). The scores of the various instruments used in the study significantly correlated with each other. Comprehensive screening for psychological distress and assessment of HRQL should be part of routine TB care. The healthcare workers under the program should be sensitized to use the various screening tools on a day-to-day basis to identify patients who require expert psychiatrist care. The majority of the patients with distress, but without a psychiatric illness, can be handled well with dedicated counseling sessions by the healthcare workers themselves. The ancillary staff should be encouraged and trained to meet the demands in resource-constrained settings. A multidisciplinary approach, with close integration of TB programs with mental health services, is urgently required to eliminate TB
{"title":"Psychological morbidity and quality of life of patients with pulmonary tuberculosis.","authors":"Kranti Garg, Preeyati Chopra, Jasmin Garg, Deepak Goyal, Darshana Ke, Vishal Chopra","doi":"10.4081/monaldi.2024.3171","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4081/monaldi.2024.3171","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Tuberculosis (TB) is associated with psychological distress, poor coping, deterioration in health-related quality of life (HRQL), and stigma. However, these issues have never received sufficient attention as a part of routine care. The healthcare workers and physicians of primary contact are not sensitized to use discrete screening questionnaires to identify and address these issues. A longitudinal study was hence conducted in the Department of Pulmonary Medicine in collaboration with the Department of Psychiatry. 75 microbiologically confirmed 'new' pulmonary TB patients were enrolled. Socio-demographic and clinical details were noted. The patients were then evaluated for psychological distress using the General Health Questionnaire-12-Hindi version (GHQ-12) and Patient Distress Thermometer (PDT); coping strategies using the Coping Strategy Check List-Hindi Version (CSCL); HRQL using the World Health Organization Quality of Life-Brief-Hindi version (WHOQOL-Bref), and stigma using the Explanatory Model Interview Catalogue-affected persons Stigma Scale (EMIC-SS), at the start of treatment. Those having a GHQ-12 score ≥3 were labeled as 'screen positive' for psychological distress and referred to a consultant psychiatrist for detailed psychological assessment. Treatment was given by the psychiatrist if diagnosed with a psychiatric illness. All those without the diagnosis of a psychiatric illness were counseled by a pulmonologist. All patients were called for a follow-up visit and repeat assessments on the 15th day at the end of the intensive phase, using the same instruments employed at baseline. The patients already on treatment by the psychiatrist were again evaluated for their psychiatric illness. 32 (42.7%) patients had psychological distress (GHQ-12≥3) at baseline. 20 of them (26.7%) were diagnosed with a psychiatric illness. However, only 2 (2.7%) patients had psychological distress and psychiatric illness at follow-up (p<0.001). Mean scores of GHQ-12, PDT, CSCL, WHOQOL-Bref-26, and EMIC-SS at baseline were 3.000±1.9590, 2.333±1.2980, 3.480±2.2017, 311.63±30.201 and 5.267±1.8478, respectively. All the scores improved significantly at follow-up (p<0.001). The scores of the various instruments used in the study significantly correlated with each other. Comprehensive screening for psychological distress and assessment of HRQL should be part of routine TB care. The healthcare workers under the program should be sensitized to use the various screening tools on a day-to-day basis to identify patients who require expert psychiatrist care. The majority of the patients with distress, but without a psychiatric illness, can be handled well with dedicated counseling sessions by the healthcare workers themselves. The ancillary staff should be encouraged and trained to meet the demands in resource-constrained settings. A multidisciplinary approach, with close integration of TB programs with mental health services, is urgently required to eliminate TB","PeriodicalId":51593,"journal":{"name":"Monaldi Archives for Chest Disease","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2024-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142480438","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-10-15DOI: 10.4081/monaldi.2024.3070
Davide Cavasin, Umberto Zanini, Laura Montelisciani, Maria Grazia Valsecchi, Laura Fabbri, Laura Antolini, Fabrizio Luppi
COVID-19 has a negative impact on the survival of respiratory patients, especially those with interstitial lung disease. This review aims to better understand the effect of COVID-19 on patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). A systematic search of MEDLINE, PubMed, Embase, and Scopus performed from December 2019 up to July 2024 identified relevant studies. Eligibility criteria included English language, sample size ≥10 patients, COVID-19 infection and outcome measures. Two independent reviewers assessed studies using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for bias and extracted data. Meta-analysis employed a random-effects model, and the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation assessed evidence quality. Outcomes considered were hospitalization, intensive care unit admission, and mortality. Of the 1541 initially identified articles, 6 high-quality studies were included. Meta-analysis revealed a 34% mortality rate [95% confidence interval (CI): 21-48%], 36% hospitalization rate (95% CI: 10-75%), and 31% ICU admission rate (95% CI: 7-71%) among IPF patients with COVID-19. The certainty of evidence was low or very low due to publication bias and heterogeneity. This study underscores the elevated risk of hospitalization and death in IPF patients with COVID-19, emphasizing the vulnerability of this population. Prompt and tailored care is crucial to mitigate the impact of COVID-19 on IPF patients, necessitating proactive measures, vaccination, and comprehensive management.
{"title":"The impact of COVID-19 infection on idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis mortality: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Davide Cavasin, Umberto Zanini, Laura Montelisciani, Maria Grazia Valsecchi, Laura Fabbri, Laura Antolini, Fabrizio Luppi","doi":"10.4081/monaldi.2024.3070","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4081/monaldi.2024.3070","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>COVID-19 has a negative impact on the survival of respiratory patients, especially those with interstitial lung disease. This review aims to better understand the effect of COVID-19 on patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). A systematic search of MEDLINE, PubMed, Embase, and Scopus performed from December 2019 up to July 2024 identified relevant studies. Eligibility criteria included English language, sample size ≥10 patients, COVID-19 infection and outcome measures. Two independent reviewers assessed studies using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for bias and extracted data. Meta-analysis employed a random-effects model, and the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation assessed evidence quality. Outcomes considered were hospitalization, intensive care unit admission, and mortality. Of the 1541 initially identified articles, 6 high-quality studies were included. Meta-analysis revealed a 34% mortality rate [95% confidence interval (CI): 21-48%], 36% hospitalization rate (95% CI: 10-75%), and 31% ICU admission rate (95% CI: 7-71%) among IPF patients with COVID-19. The certainty of evidence was low or very low due to publication bias and heterogeneity. This study underscores the elevated risk of hospitalization and death in IPF patients with COVID-19, emphasizing the vulnerability of this population. Prompt and tailored care is crucial to mitigate the impact of COVID-19 on IPF patients, necessitating proactive measures, vaccination, and comprehensive management.</p>","PeriodicalId":51593,"journal":{"name":"Monaldi Archives for Chest Disease","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2024-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142480439","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-10-09DOI: 10.4081/monaldi.2024.3069
Paola Gnerre, Ombretta Para, Dino Stefano Di Massimo, Tiziana Marcella Attardo, Dario Manfellotto, Francesco Dentali
Health workers, and in particular doctors and nurses working in internal medicine units (IMU), are at high risk of burnout. Overcrowding, complexity and severity of clinical cases, patients' social and family issues, impact of death, and "workload" are all aspects that are specific risk factors that might lead to the development of burnout in this scenario. People suffering from burnout may face several psychological problems (including extreme physical and mental fatigue, emotional exhaustion, loss of enthusiasm concerning work, feelings of cynicism, and a low sense of personal accomplishment) and are also at risk of developing some somatic diseases. Furthermore, the quality of care delivered by a worker in burnout seems to worsen and slip down. In this review, we analyzed the main risk factors and consequences of burnout in IMUs, and we propose individual and organizational measures that may be applied to be able to prevent burnout in this setting.
{"title":"Prevalence, risk factors and clinical impact of burnout in internal medicine units: a call to action.","authors":"Paola Gnerre, Ombretta Para, Dino Stefano Di Massimo, Tiziana Marcella Attardo, Dario Manfellotto, Francesco Dentali","doi":"10.4081/monaldi.2024.3069","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4081/monaldi.2024.3069","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Health workers, and in particular doctors and nurses working in internal medicine units (IMU), are at high risk of burnout. Overcrowding, complexity and severity of clinical cases, patients' social and family issues, impact of death, and \"workload\" are all aspects that are specific risk factors that might lead to the development of burnout in this scenario. People suffering from burnout may face several psychological problems (including extreme physical and mental fatigue, emotional exhaustion, loss of enthusiasm concerning work, feelings of cynicism, and a low sense of personal accomplishment) and are also at risk of developing some somatic diseases. Furthermore, the quality of care delivered by a worker in burnout seems to worsen and slip down. In this review, we analyzed the main risk factors and consequences of burnout in IMUs, and we propose individual and organizational measures that may be applied to be able to prevent burnout in this setting.</p>","PeriodicalId":51593,"journal":{"name":"Monaldi Archives for Chest Disease","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2024-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142395179","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-10-07DOI: 10.4081/monaldi.2024.3079
Lorenzo Carriera, Sara Caporuscio, Marta Fantò, Alice D'Abramo, Genesio Puzio, Luca Triolo, Angelo Coppola
Biological drugs have revolutionized the management of severe asthma, and a tailored treatment approach made it possible to consider remission as an achievable treatment target. The incidence of autoimmune diseases is increasing in many parts of the world. Patients suffering from severe asthma, eligible or already treated with an asthma-approved biologic agent, may suffer from another immune-mediated inflammatory disease (IMID) that could require the simultaneous use of a second monoclonal antibody. The real-life studies available in the literature describing the concurrent administration of an asthma-approved biologic agent with another biologic for a different immune disease, obtained through a systematic search on online databases based on monoclonal antibodies, were collected and analyzed. 26 articles were included in this review according to the prespecified inclusion and exclusion criteria. All included papers were retrospective in nature. Study designs were case reports (n=18), case series (n=3), retrospective chart reviews (n=3), retrospective observational studies (n=1), and cohort studies (n=1). The study is intended to present, within the current literature, all the administered combinations of severe asthma-approved biologics with monoclonal antibodies for a different indication. Those were grouped according to the IMID for whom the second biologic agent, with a different mechanism of action, was prescribed. The combinations prescribed to the cohort of patients specifically treating uncontrolled severe asthma were deeper evaluated in the discussion section, since an analysis of these therapeutic combinations deriving from real-life experiences may be useful to optimize the management of patients with severe asthma, ultimately leading to improved patient care and outcomes. Prospective registries and future studies are required to assess the safety and efficacy of combination therapies for severe asthmatic patients who suffer from an IMID.
{"title":"Combination treatment with monoclonal antibodies for the management of severe asthma and immune-mediated inflammatory diseases: a comprehensive review.","authors":"Lorenzo Carriera, Sara Caporuscio, Marta Fantò, Alice D'Abramo, Genesio Puzio, Luca Triolo, Angelo Coppola","doi":"10.4081/monaldi.2024.3079","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4081/monaldi.2024.3079","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Biological drugs have revolutionized the management of severe asthma, and a tailored treatment approach made it possible to consider remission as an achievable treatment target. The incidence of autoimmune diseases is increasing in many parts of the world. Patients suffering from severe asthma, eligible or already treated with an asthma-approved biologic agent, may suffer from another immune-mediated inflammatory disease (IMID) that could require the simultaneous use of a second monoclonal antibody. The real-life studies available in the literature describing the concurrent administration of an asthma-approved biologic agent with another biologic for a different immune disease, obtained through a systematic search on online databases based on monoclonal antibodies, were collected and analyzed. 26 articles were included in this review according to the prespecified inclusion and exclusion criteria. All included papers were retrospective in nature. Study designs were case reports (n=18), case series (n=3), retrospective chart reviews (n=3), retrospective observational studies (n=1), and cohort studies (n=1). The study is intended to present, within the current literature, all the administered combinations of severe asthma-approved biologics with monoclonal antibodies for a different indication. Those were grouped according to the IMID for whom the second biologic agent, with a different mechanism of action, was prescribed. The combinations prescribed to the cohort of patients specifically treating uncontrolled severe asthma were deeper evaluated in the discussion section, since an analysis of these therapeutic combinations deriving from real-life experiences may be useful to optimize the management of patients with severe asthma, ultimately leading to improved patient care and outcomes. Prospective registries and future studies are required to assess the safety and efficacy of combination therapies for severe asthmatic patients who suffer from an IMID.</p>","PeriodicalId":51593,"journal":{"name":"Monaldi Archives for Chest Disease","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2024-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142382354","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}