首页 > 最新文献

Interactive Journal of Medical Research最新文献

英文 中文
Dengue Epidemiology in 7 Southeast Asian Countries: 24-Year, Retrospective, Multicountry Ecological Study. 7个东南亚国家的登革热流行病学:24年,回顾性,多国生态学研究。
IF 1.9 Q3 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL Pub Date : 2025-09-08 DOI: 10.2196/70491
Shun-Long Weng, Fang-Yu Hung, Sung-Tse Li, Bo-Huang Liou, Chun-Yan Yeung, Yu-Lin Tai, Yi-Hsuan Wu, Ya-Ning Huang, Nan-Chang Chiu, Liang-Yen Lin, Hsin Chi, Chien-Yu Lin

Background: Dengue fever remains the most significant vector-borne disease in Southeast Asia, imposing a substantial burden on public health systems. Global warming and increased international mobility may exacerbate the disease's prevalence. Furthermore, the unprecedented COVID-19 pandemic may have influenced the epidemiological patterns of dengue.

Objective: This study aimed to evaluate epidemiological changes in dengue incidence in Southeast Asia.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective, multicountry ecological study analyzing trends in dengue incidence in 7 Southeast Asian countries from January 2000 to December 2023. Data were extracted from official World Health Organization reports and national health department databases. Countries with data that were incomplete, inconsistent, or not publicly available were excluded from the final analysis. Annual incidence rates were analyzed, and linear trends were calculated to assess long-term patterns.

Results: Epidemiological data from 7 Southeast Asian countries, comprising Thailand, Singapore, Vietnam, Malaysia, the Philippines, Cambodia, and Taiwan, were analyzed across the 24-year study period. A notable nadir in dengue cases was observed coinciding with the COVID-19 pandemic. Significant increasing trends in dengue incidence were identified in Singapore, Vietnam, Malaysia, and the Philippines (slopes: 8.243, 6.513, 8.737, and 8.172; R2 values: 0.14, 0.34, 0.345, and 0.46, respectively, all P<.05).

Conclusions: Dengue fever continues to pose a significant public health challenge in Southeast Asia. Our analysis demonstrates a substantial increase in dengue cases in several countries over the study period. While a temporary decline was observed during the COVID-19 pandemic, a subsequent resurgence of cases highlights the persistent threat of dengue in the region. These findings underscore the critical need for sustained surveillance and innovative control strategies to mitigate the impact of dengue in Southeast Asia.

背景:登革热仍然是东南亚最重要的媒介传播疾病,对公共卫生系统造成重大负担。全球变暖和国际流动性增加可能加剧该病的流行。此外,前所未有的COVID-19大流行可能影响了登革热的流行病学模式。目的:了解东南亚地区登革热发病率的流行病学变化。方法:我们进行了一项回顾性的多国生态学研究,分析了2000年1月至2023年12月东南亚7个国家登革热发病率的趋势。数据摘自世界卫生组织的官方报告和国家卫生部门的数据库。数据不完整、不一致或无法公开获得的国家被排除在最终分析之外。分析年发病率,并计算线性趋势以评估长期模式。在COVID-19大流行期间,观察到登革热病例的显著最低点。新加坡、越南、马来西亚和菲律宾的登革热发病率呈显著上升趋势(斜率分别为8.243、6.513、8.737和8.172;R2分别为0.14、0.34、0.345和0.46)。结论:登革热在东南亚地区继续构成重大公共卫生挑战。我们的分析表明,在研究期间,若干国家的登革热病例大幅增加。虽然在2019冠状病毒病大流行期间观察到暂时的下降,但随后病例的重新出现凸显了该地区登革热的持续威胁。这些发现突出表明,迫切需要持续监测和创新控制战略,以减轻登革热在东南亚的影响。
{"title":"Dengue Epidemiology in 7 Southeast Asian Countries: 24-Year, Retrospective, Multicountry Ecological Study.","authors":"Shun-Long Weng, Fang-Yu Hung, Sung-Tse Li, Bo-Huang Liou, Chun-Yan Yeung, Yu-Lin Tai, Yi-Hsuan Wu, Ya-Ning Huang, Nan-Chang Chiu, Liang-Yen Lin, Hsin Chi, Chien-Yu Lin","doi":"10.2196/70491","DOIUrl":"10.2196/70491","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Dengue fever remains the most significant vector-borne disease in Southeast Asia, imposing a substantial burden on public health systems. Global warming and increased international mobility may exacerbate the disease's prevalence. Furthermore, the unprecedented COVID-19 pandemic may have influenced the epidemiological patterns of dengue.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate epidemiological changes in dengue incidence in Southeast Asia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective, multicountry ecological study analyzing trends in dengue incidence in 7 Southeast Asian countries from January 2000 to December 2023. Data were extracted from official World Health Organization reports and national health department databases. Countries with data that were incomplete, inconsistent, or not publicly available were excluded from the final analysis. Annual incidence rates were analyzed, and linear trends were calculated to assess long-term patterns.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Epidemiological data from 7 Southeast Asian countries, comprising Thailand, Singapore, Vietnam, Malaysia, the Philippines, Cambodia, and Taiwan, were analyzed across the 24-year study period. A notable nadir in dengue cases was observed coinciding with the COVID-19 pandemic. Significant increasing trends in dengue incidence were identified in Singapore, Vietnam, Malaysia, and the Philippines (slopes: 8.243, 6.513, 8.737, and 8.172; R2 values: 0.14, 0.34, 0.345, and 0.46, respectively, all P<.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Dengue fever continues to pose a significant public health challenge in Southeast Asia. Our analysis demonstrates a substantial increase in dengue cases in several countries over the study period. While a temporary decline was observed during the COVID-19 pandemic, a subsequent resurgence of cases highlights the persistent threat of dengue in the region. These findings underscore the critical need for sustained surveillance and innovative control strategies to mitigate the impact of dengue in Southeast Asia.</p>","PeriodicalId":51757,"journal":{"name":"Interactive Journal of Medical Research","volume":"14 ","pages":"e70491"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2025-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12416874/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145024718","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Mapping Hot Spots and Global Research Trends in Exergaming Between 1997 and 2024: Bibliometric Analysis. 1997 - 2024年全球游戏研究热点与趋势:文献计量分析。
IF 1.9 Q3 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL Pub Date : 2025-08-25 DOI: 10.2196/66738
Abdullah Kayhan, Elif Kose, Burcu Kayhan, Nan Zeng
<p><strong>Background: </strong>Exergaming, the combination of exercise and gaming, has emerged as an important area in physical activity (PA) research. By leveraging advances in video game technology, exergaming supports both physical and mental health. This growing interest in exergaming has increasingly attracted researchers over the years. Examining the development of exergaming research with a bibliometric approach is thought to offer valuable perspectives to researchers by revealing the trends and main contributions in the field.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to identify the most researched concepts and topics in the field of exergaming; track the changes of trending topics over the years; identify the most influential journals as well as the authors who have contributed the most to the field; identify groundbreaking studies and neglected topics that shape future work; and reveal the countries, institutions, and collaborations that have contributed the most to the field. It also aims to identify research gaps in the field of exergaming and provide important recommendations for future research.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A bibliometric analysis covering studies between 1997 and 2024 was conducted using the Web of Science database. The R-based Bibliometrix package and the Biblioshiny web interface were used for data analysis and visualization. The analysis included original research papers and reviews. These analyses provided insights into research trends, citation metrics, and thematic developments.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1626 studies were analyzed, and the results indicated a steep rise in exergaming research since 2015, peaking in the years 2020-2021. Major high-impact journals publishing in this area include Games for Health Journal and International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. Researchers who have contributed significantly and enriched the knowledge base of the exergaming field included Gao Zan, Eling de Bruin, and Zeng Nan. The most cited studies were classified into 2 different clusters, namely, cluster 1 that focuses on the concepts of PA, exercise, energy expenditure, and children, while cluster 2 focuses on rehabilitation, balance, adults, and aging. Medicine, information technology, and intention are some of the emerging themes. From a research productivity perspective, there is an undisputed front-runner, the United States, but substantial contributions have definitely come from either the Swiss Federal Institute of Technology or the Karolinska Institute.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Despite significant growth in exergaming research over the last decade, research gaps remain, particularly in understanding how exergaming can be effectively integrated into long-term PA promotion and broader health outcomes. These gaps were identified by the absence or low representation of relevant keywords (eg, "cost-effectiveness," "community-based intervention," and "lon
背景:运动游戏(Exergaming)是运动与游戏的结合,已成为体育活动(PA)研究的一个重要领域。通过利用先进的视频游戏技术,游戏有助于身心健康。多年来,这种对游戏日益增长的兴趣吸引了越来越多的研究人员。用文献计量学方法考察游戏研究的发展,通过揭示该领域的趋势和主要贡献,为研究人员提供了有价值的视角。目的:本研究旨在识别游戏领域中研究最多的概念和主题;跟踪多年来热门话题的变化;确定最具影响力的期刊以及对该领域贡献最大的作者;确定影响未来工作的开创性研究和被忽视的主题;并揭示对该领域贡献最大的国家、机构和合作。它还旨在确定游戏领域的研究空白,并为未来的研究提供重要建议。方法:利用Web of Science数据库对1997 ~ 2024年的文献计量学研究进行分析。使用基于r语言的Bibliometrix软件包和Biblioshiny web界面进行数据分析和可视化。分析包括原始研究论文和评论。这些分析提供了对研究趋势、引用指标和专题发展的见解。结果:共分析了1626项研究,结果表明,自2015年以来,游戏研究急剧上升,在2020-2021年达到顶峰。在这一领域出版的主要高影响力期刊包括《健康游戏杂志》和《国际环境研究与公共卫生杂志》。高赞、Eling de Bruin和曾楠等人对游戏领域的知识库做出了重要贡献。被引用最多的研究被分为两个不同的集群,即集群1侧重于PA、运动、能量消耗和儿童的概念,而集群2侧重于康复、平衡、成人和衰老。医学、信息技术和意图是一些新兴的主题。从研究生产力的角度来看,无可争议的领先者是美国,但实质性的贡献肯定来自瑞士联邦理工学院或卡罗林斯卡学院。结论:尽管在过去十年中,体育锻炼的研究有了显著的增长,但研究差距仍然存在,特别是在理解体育锻炼如何有效地整合到长期的PA促进和更广泛的健康结果中。在专题制图和关键词趋势分析中,相关关键词(如“成本效益”、“社区干预”和“长期健康结果”)的缺失或代表性较低,以及这些领域的引用密度有限,从而确定了这些差距。未来的工作应该更系统地探讨这些问题,以推动该领域的发展。
{"title":"Mapping Hot Spots and Global Research Trends in Exergaming Between 1997 and 2024: Bibliometric Analysis.","authors":"Abdullah Kayhan, Elif Kose, Burcu Kayhan, Nan Zeng","doi":"10.2196/66738","DOIUrl":"10.2196/66738","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Background: &lt;/strong&gt;Exergaming, the combination of exercise and gaming, has emerged as an important area in physical activity (PA) research. By leveraging advances in video game technology, exergaming supports both physical and mental health. This growing interest in exergaming has increasingly attracted researchers over the years. Examining the development of exergaming research with a bibliometric approach is thought to offer valuable perspectives to researchers by revealing the trends and main contributions in the field.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Objective: &lt;/strong&gt;This study aims to identify the most researched concepts and topics in the field of exergaming; track the changes of trending topics over the years; identify the most influential journals as well as the authors who have contributed the most to the field; identify groundbreaking studies and neglected topics that shape future work; and reveal the countries, institutions, and collaborations that have contributed the most to the field. It also aims to identify research gaps in the field of exergaming and provide important recommendations for future research.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Methods: &lt;/strong&gt;A bibliometric analysis covering studies between 1997 and 2024 was conducted using the Web of Science database. The R-based Bibliometrix package and the Biblioshiny web interface were used for data analysis and visualization. The analysis included original research papers and reviews. These analyses provided insights into research trends, citation metrics, and thematic developments.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Results: &lt;/strong&gt;A total of 1626 studies were analyzed, and the results indicated a steep rise in exergaming research since 2015, peaking in the years 2020-2021. Major high-impact journals publishing in this area include Games for Health Journal and International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. Researchers who have contributed significantly and enriched the knowledge base of the exergaming field included Gao Zan, Eling de Bruin, and Zeng Nan. The most cited studies were classified into 2 different clusters, namely, cluster 1 that focuses on the concepts of PA, exercise, energy expenditure, and children, while cluster 2 focuses on rehabilitation, balance, adults, and aging. Medicine, information technology, and intention are some of the emerging themes. From a research productivity perspective, there is an undisputed front-runner, the United States, but substantial contributions have definitely come from either the Swiss Federal Institute of Technology or the Karolinska Institute.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Conclusions: &lt;/strong&gt;Despite significant growth in exergaming research over the last decade, research gaps remain, particularly in understanding how exergaming can be effectively integrated into long-term PA promotion and broader health outcomes. These gaps were identified by the absence or low representation of relevant keywords (eg, \"cost-effectiveness,\" \"community-based intervention,\" and \"lon","PeriodicalId":51757,"journal":{"name":"Interactive Journal of Medical Research","volume":"14 ","pages":"e66738"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2025-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12377698/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144978137","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
eHealth Literacy Interventions: Scoping Review. 电子健康素养干预措施:范围审查。
IF 1.9 Q3 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL Pub Date : 2025-08-22 DOI: 10.2196/69640
Yan Wang, Yutian Niu, Rongjing Xu, Qingqing Zhang, Shoumei Jia, Anni Wang

Background: Electronic resources have become a predominant modality for health information dissemination in recent years. eHealth literacy (eHL) means individuals' competencies to effectively acquire and use health information from electronic sources. Enhancing eHL is thus essential to facilitate individuals' effective engagement with electronic resources and promote improved health management.

Objective: This scoping review aimed to synthesize the characteristics of eHL interventions, thereby providing a reference for future intervention strategies.

Methods: A comprehensive search of PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, ProQuest, CINAHL, CNKI, VIP, Wan Fang Data, and Sino Med limited to Chinese and English-language studies published before August 2024 was conducted. The interventional studies included had the explicit primary objective of enhancing eHL. We also incorporated studies that assessed eHL as a secondary outcome or mediator influencing health behaviors or clinical outcomes. All publications were required to provide publicly accessible complete datasets. We excluded conference abstracts and protocols. Academic theses and dissertations were included if they underwent institutional quality assurance through rigorous academic review processes and met predefined eligibility criteria.

Results: A total of 35 studies were included in this review. The most prevalent eHL interventions (12/35, 34%) were delivered via mobile apps and devices in various settings, including educational institutions, public spaces, health care facilities, and community centers. These interventions predominantly focused on enhancing information literacy, health literacy, and computer literacy across the 6 domains of eHL: traditional, health, information, scientific, media, and computer literacy. A majority of the interventions were conducted on a weekly basis (6/13, 46%) and had a duration of 24 weeks (6/35, 17%). However, 77% (27/35) of interventions did not assess long-term effects. The primary outcomes of eHL interventions encompassed perceived eHL, actual eHealth knowledge and skills, health literacy, health behavior, and clinical outcomes, with 86% (30/35) indicating positive effects. The eHealth Literacy Scale was the most frequently used assessment tool.

Conclusions: This study synthesizes the characteristics of eHL interventions. Current eHL interventions exhibit limitations in theoretical grounding, longitudinal tracking, and traditional or media literacy components. Overreliance on self-reported metrics constrains validity assessment. Future work should strengthen theoretical frameworks, integrate objective metrics, and enhance longitudinal designs.

背景:近年来,电子资源已成为卫生信息传播的主要方式。电子卫生素养(eHL)是指个人从电子资源中有效获取和使用卫生信息的能力。因此,加强电子健康管理对于促进个人有效利用电子资源和促进改善健康管理至关重要。目的:本综述旨在综合eHL干预措施的特点,为今后的干预策略提供参考。方法:综合检索PubMed、Embase、Cochrane Library、Web of Science、ProQuest、CINAHL、CNKI、VIP、万方数据、Sino Med,仅限2024年8月前发表的中英文研究。所纳入的介入性研究的明确主要目标是增强eHL。我们还纳入了评估eHL作为影响健康行为或临床结果的次要结局或中介的研究。所有出版物都必须提供可公开查阅的完整数据集。我们排除了会议摘要和协议。学术论文和学位论文必须通过严格的学术评审程序,并符合预先设定的资格标准,才能被纳入。结果:本综述共纳入35项研究。最普遍的eHL干预措施(12/ 35,34 %)是通过各种环境中的移动应用程序和设备提供的,包括教育机构、公共场所、卫生保健设施和社区中心。这些干预措施主要侧重于提高eHL 6个领域的信息素养、卫生素养和计算机素养:传统、卫生、信息、科学、媒体和计算机素养。大多数干预措施每周进行一次(6/ 13,46%),持续时间为24周(6/ 35,17%)。然而,77%(27/35)的干预措施没有评估长期效果。eHL干预的主要结果包括感知到的eHL、实际的电子健康知识和技能、健康素养、健康行为和临床结果,86%(30/35)表明有积极效果。电子健康素养量表是最常用的评估工具。结论:本研究综合了eHL干预措施的特点。目前的eHL干预措施在理论基础、纵向跟踪和传统或媒体素养成分方面表现出局限性。过度依赖自我报告的度量标准限制了有效性评估。未来的工作应加强理论框架,整合客观指标,加强纵向设计。
{"title":"eHealth Literacy Interventions: Scoping Review.","authors":"Yan Wang, Yutian Niu, Rongjing Xu, Qingqing Zhang, Shoumei Jia, Anni Wang","doi":"10.2196/69640","DOIUrl":"10.2196/69640","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Electronic resources have become a predominant modality for health information dissemination in recent years. eHealth literacy (eHL) means individuals' competencies to effectively acquire and use health information from electronic sources. Enhancing eHL is thus essential to facilitate individuals' effective engagement with electronic resources and promote improved health management.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This scoping review aimed to synthesize the characteristics of eHL interventions, thereby providing a reference for future intervention strategies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A comprehensive search of PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, ProQuest, CINAHL, CNKI, VIP, Wan Fang Data, and Sino Med limited to Chinese and English-language studies published before August 2024 was conducted. The interventional studies included had the explicit primary objective of enhancing eHL. We also incorporated studies that assessed eHL as a secondary outcome or mediator influencing health behaviors or clinical outcomes. All publications were required to provide publicly accessible complete datasets. We excluded conference abstracts and protocols. Academic theses and dissertations were included if they underwent institutional quality assurance through rigorous academic review processes and met predefined eligibility criteria.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 35 studies were included in this review. The most prevalent eHL interventions (12/35, 34%) were delivered via mobile apps and devices in various settings, including educational institutions, public spaces, health care facilities, and community centers. These interventions predominantly focused on enhancing information literacy, health literacy, and computer literacy across the 6 domains of eHL: traditional, health, information, scientific, media, and computer literacy. A majority of the interventions were conducted on a weekly basis (6/13, 46%) and had a duration of 24 weeks (6/35, 17%). However, 77% (27/35) of interventions did not assess long-term effects. The primary outcomes of eHL interventions encompassed perceived eHL, actual eHealth knowledge and skills, health literacy, health behavior, and clinical outcomes, with 86% (30/35) indicating positive effects. The eHealth Literacy Scale was the most frequently used assessment tool.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study synthesizes the characteristics of eHL interventions. Current eHL interventions exhibit limitations in theoretical grounding, longitudinal tracking, and traditional or media literacy components. Overreliance on self-reported metrics constrains validity assessment. Future work should strengthen theoretical frameworks, integrate objective metrics, and enhance longitudinal designs.</p>","PeriodicalId":51757,"journal":{"name":"Interactive Journal of Medical Research","volume":"14 ","pages":"e69640"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2025-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12373412/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144978113","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Safety and Efficacy of Aspirin and Indobufen in the Treatment of Atherosclerotic Diseases: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. 阿司匹林和吲哚布芬治疗动脉粥样硬化性疾病的安全性和有效性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
IF 1.9 Q3 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL Pub Date : 2025-08-20 DOI: 10.2196/75363
Wenhao Pan, Linger Guan, Haicheng Zhang

Background: The pathogenesis of atherosclerotic thrombosis primarily involves platelet activation and aggregation, making antiplatelet therapy the cornerstone of treatment for such diseases.

Objective: This meta-analysis aimed to compare the safety and efficacy of aspirin and indobufen in antiplatelet therapy for patients with atherosclerotic diseases.

Methods: We searched the Cochrane Library, PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Chinese Wanfang databases. The literature was screened according to predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Risk ratio (RR) was used to assess the magnitude of risk associated with exposure and our inclusion criteria are as follows: (1) the study population comprised adults (aged 18 years and older) with coronary heart disease caused by coronary artery atherosclerosis or stroke caused by intracranial atherosclerosis; (2) the intervention was represented by indobufen in the study groups versus aspirin in the control groups; (3) the primary outcome was the incidence of major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events or any bleeding or Bleeding Academic Research Consortium 2/3/5 bleeding; (4) the secondary outcomes were cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, and ischemic stroke; adverse cardiovascular events such as coronary thrombus reformation, heart failure, myocardial infarction, stroke, angina pectoris, and cardiovascular death; stroke; myocardial infarction; and cardiovascular death; and (5) the studies were randomized clinical trials with either crossover or parallel designs or prospective observational trials.

Results: Eighteen trials with a total of 12,981 patients were included in this study. Compared to aspirin, indobufen reduced the risk of (1) bleeding events (RR 0.54, 95% CI 0.41-0.71; P<.0001), (2) Bleeding Academic Research Consortium 2/3/5 bleeding (RR 0.50, 95% CI 0.26-0.94; P=.03), (3) adverse cardiovascular events (RR 0.43, 95% CI 0.30-0.61; P<.00001), and (4) myocardial infarction (RR 0.60, 95% CI 0.41-0.89; P=.01). However, there were no significant differences between the 2 groups in terms of major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events, stroke, or cardiovascular mortality.

Conclusions: Compared with aspirin, indobufen demonstrated better safety and was not inferior to aspirin in terms of efficacy, with superior results in some aspects (eg, fewer risks of adverse cardiovascular events and myocardial infarction). Further studies with larger sample sizes or longer follow-up periods may provide additional evidence.

背景:动脉粥样硬化性血栓形成的发病机制主要与血小板活化和聚集有关,因此抗血小板治疗是此类疾病治疗的基础。目的:本荟萃分析旨在比较阿司匹林和吲哚布芬在动脉粥样硬化性疾病患者抗血小板治疗中的安全性和有效性。方法:检索Cochrane Library、PubMed、Embase、Web of Science、Chinese Wanfang数据库。根据预先设定的纳入和排除标准对文献进行筛选。风险比(RR)用于评估与暴露相关的风险程度,我们的纳入标准如下:(1)研究人群包括由冠状动脉粥样硬化引起的冠心病或颅内动脉粥样硬化引起的中风的成年人(18岁及以上);(2)干预以研究组的吲哚布芬和对照组的阿司匹林为代表;(3)主要转归为主要心脑血管不良事件发生率或任何出血或出血学术研究联合体2/3/5出血;(4)次要结局为心血管死亡、心肌梗死和缺血性脑卒中;不良心血管事件,如冠状动脉血栓形成、心力衰竭、心肌梗死、中风、心绞痛和心血管死亡;中风;心肌梗死;心血管死亡;(5)研究为随机临床试验,采用交叉或平行设计或前瞻性观察试验。结果:本研究纳入18项试验,共12981例患者。与阿司匹林相比,吲哚布芬降低了(1)出血事件的风险(RR 0.54, 95% CI 0.41-0.71);结论:与阿司匹林相比,吲哚布芬的安全性更好,在疗效上并不逊色于阿司匹林,在某些方面(如不良心血管事件和心肌梗死的风险更低)效果更佳。更大样本量或更长随访期的进一步研究可能会提供更多证据。
{"title":"Safety and Efficacy of Aspirin and Indobufen in the Treatment of Atherosclerotic Diseases: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Wenhao Pan, Linger Guan, Haicheng Zhang","doi":"10.2196/75363","DOIUrl":"10.2196/75363","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The pathogenesis of atherosclerotic thrombosis primarily involves platelet activation and aggregation, making antiplatelet therapy the cornerstone of treatment for such diseases.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This meta-analysis aimed to compare the safety and efficacy of aspirin and indobufen in antiplatelet therapy for patients with atherosclerotic diseases.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched the Cochrane Library, PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Chinese Wanfang databases. The literature was screened according to predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Risk ratio (RR) was used to assess the magnitude of risk associated with exposure and our inclusion criteria are as follows: (1) the study population comprised adults (aged 18 years and older) with coronary heart disease caused by coronary artery atherosclerosis or stroke caused by intracranial atherosclerosis; (2) the intervention was represented by indobufen in the study groups versus aspirin in the control groups; (3) the primary outcome was the incidence of major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events or any bleeding or Bleeding Academic Research Consortium 2/3/5 bleeding; (4) the secondary outcomes were cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, and ischemic stroke; adverse cardiovascular events such as coronary thrombus reformation, heart failure, myocardial infarction, stroke, angina pectoris, and cardiovascular death; stroke; myocardial infarction; and cardiovascular death; and (5) the studies were randomized clinical trials with either crossover or parallel designs or prospective observational trials.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eighteen trials with a total of 12,981 patients were included in this study. Compared to aspirin, indobufen reduced the risk of (1) bleeding events (RR 0.54, 95% CI 0.41-0.71; P<.0001), (2) Bleeding Academic Research Consortium 2/3/5 bleeding (RR 0.50, 95% CI 0.26-0.94; P=.03), (3) adverse cardiovascular events (RR 0.43, 95% CI 0.30-0.61; P<.00001), and (4) myocardial infarction (RR 0.60, 95% CI 0.41-0.89; P=.01). However, there were no significant differences between the 2 groups in terms of major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events, stroke, or cardiovascular mortality.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Compared with aspirin, indobufen demonstrated better safety and was not inferior to aspirin in terms of efficacy, with superior results in some aspects (eg, fewer risks of adverse cardiovascular events and myocardial infarction). Further studies with larger sample sizes or longer follow-up periods may provide additional evidence.</p>","PeriodicalId":51757,"journal":{"name":"Interactive Journal of Medical Research","volume":"14 ","pages":"e75363"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2025-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12391900/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144978081","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Developing Requirements for a Standardized System to Return Individual Research Results Back to Study Participants: Narrative Review. 开发一个标准化系统的要求,将个人研究结果返回给研究参与者:叙述性评论。
IF 1.9 Q3 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL Pub Date : 2025-08-18 DOI: 10.2196/65606
Rosalyn Leigh Carr, Vita Chan, Nicholas C West, Matthias Görges
<p><strong>Background: </strong>The increasing prevalence of smart devices has created vast amounts of untapped data, presenting new opportunities for data sharing across various fields, such as environmental sciences, health management, and astrophysics. While a significant portion of the public is willing to donate personal data, we need to better understand how to obtain information about which data assets a person may hold and the risks, benefits, and potential uses of this data exchange mechanism. Developing a trusted data-sharing platform may increase participants' willingness to donate data and researchers' ability to return personalized results from research findings.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to develop a preliminary list of core requirements, which can be used to develop design recommendations for standardizing the return of individual research results to study participants across research disciplines.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a narrative literature review of existing platforms used to return research results to study participants. The search strategy included English-language articles published between May 2013 and May 2023. Concepts related to returning, disseminating, and sharing research results were searched for in (1) published research reports on Web of Science and MEDLINE, (2) gray literature, and (3) the bibliographies of included articles. Screening and data extraction were performed by 2 independent reviewers using Covidence. Inclusion criteria required that the study (1) included human participants, (2) returned information based on data collected from or by participants, (3) was published in English, and (4) included a description of a results-sharing system. Articles that met all 4 inclusion criteria were included in the review; articles that met the first 3 were also presented as supplementary articles. Results and requirements were synthesized thematically.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 6608 abstracts were screened, and 266 articles underwent full-text review to identify 8 articles describing the development and evaluation of 7 different return of results systems. In total, 7 of the 8 articles reported the use of multimodal dissemination methods, including a combination of physical documents, emails, phone calls, and digital platforms to support text and graphical data representations. One article outlined accessibility features to serve the specific participant population. None of the articles described in detail how results were or were not anonymized. A total of 4 studies relied on an expert or clinician to share results on behalf of the research team. Additional educational or contextual materials were included alongside results in four studies, including specific materials designed for follow-up with experts and clinicians. Participants were not hesitant to receive unfavorable results and instead aimed to incorporate such information into their lives via lifest
背景:智能设备的日益普及创造了大量未开发的数据,为环境科学、健康管理和天体物理学等各个领域的数据共享提供了新的机会。虽然很大一部分公众愿意捐赠个人数据,但我们需要更好地了解如何获取有关个人可能持有的数据资产的信息,以及这种数据交换机制的风险、利益和潜在用途。开发一个可信的数据共享平台可能会增加参与者捐赠数据的意愿,以及研究人员从研究结果中返回个性化结果的能力。目的:本研究旨在制定一份初步的核心要求清单,该清单可用于制定设计建议,以规范个体研究结果向跨研究学科的研究参与者的回报。方法:我们对用于向研究参与者返回研究结果的现有平台进行了叙述性文献综述。搜索策略包括2013年5月至2023年5月期间发表的英文文章。在Web of Science和MEDLINE上发表的研究报告,(2)灰色文献,(3)纳入文章的参考书目中检索与研究成果返回、传播和分享相关的概念。筛选和数据提取由2名独立审稿人使用covid - ence进行。纳入标准要求研究(1)包括人类参与者,(2)根据从参与者或参与者收集的数据返回信息,(3)以英文发表,(4)包括结果共享系统的描述。符合所有4项纳入标准的文章被纳入综述;符合前3条的条款也作为补充条款提出。结果和需求按主题综合。结果:总共筛选了6608篇摘要,对266篇文章进行了全文审查,以确定8篇文章描述了7种不同结果返回系统的开发和评估。总的来说,8篇文章中有7篇报告了使用多模式传播方法,包括物理文档、电子邮件、电话和数字平台的组合,以支持文本和图形数据表示。一篇文章概述了服务于特定参与者群体的可访问性特性。没有一篇文章详细描述了结果是如何匿名的。共有4项研究依靠专家或临床医生代表研究团队分享结果。除了四项研究的结果外,还包括额外的教育或背景材料,包括为专家和临床医生随访设计的特定材料。参与者并不犹豫接受不利的结果,相反,他们的目标是通过改变生活方式、临床干预或寻求社区来将这些信息纳入他们的生活中。结论:结果返回系统应支持基于文本的结果的多种传播模式。额外的教育和外行语言材料有助于参与者理解和使用从接收结果中获得的信息。
{"title":"Developing Requirements for a Standardized System to Return Individual Research Results Back to Study Participants: Narrative Review.","authors":"Rosalyn Leigh Carr, Vita Chan, Nicholas C West, Matthias Görges","doi":"10.2196/65606","DOIUrl":"10.2196/65606","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Background: &lt;/strong&gt;The increasing prevalence of smart devices has created vast amounts of untapped data, presenting new opportunities for data sharing across various fields, such as environmental sciences, health management, and astrophysics. While a significant portion of the public is willing to donate personal data, we need to better understand how to obtain information about which data assets a person may hold and the risks, benefits, and potential uses of this data exchange mechanism. Developing a trusted data-sharing platform may increase participants' willingness to donate data and researchers' ability to return personalized results from research findings.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Objective: &lt;/strong&gt;This study aimed to develop a preliminary list of core requirements, which can be used to develop design recommendations for standardizing the return of individual research results to study participants across research disciplines.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Methods: &lt;/strong&gt;We conducted a narrative literature review of existing platforms used to return research results to study participants. The search strategy included English-language articles published between May 2013 and May 2023. Concepts related to returning, disseminating, and sharing research results were searched for in (1) published research reports on Web of Science and MEDLINE, (2) gray literature, and (3) the bibliographies of included articles. Screening and data extraction were performed by 2 independent reviewers using Covidence. Inclusion criteria required that the study (1) included human participants, (2) returned information based on data collected from or by participants, (3) was published in English, and (4) included a description of a results-sharing system. Articles that met all 4 inclusion criteria were included in the review; articles that met the first 3 were also presented as supplementary articles. Results and requirements were synthesized thematically.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Results: &lt;/strong&gt;Overall, 6608 abstracts were screened, and 266 articles underwent full-text review to identify 8 articles describing the development and evaluation of 7 different return of results systems. In total, 7 of the 8 articles reported the use of multimodal dissemination methods, including a combination of physical documents, emails, phone calls, and digital platforms to support text and graphical data representations. One article outlined accessibility features to serve the specific participant population. None of the articles described in detail how results were or were not anonymized. A total of 4 studies relied on an expert or clinician to share results on behalf of the research team. Additional educational or contextual materials were included alongside results in four studies, including specific materials designed for follow-up with experts and clinicians. Participants were not hesitant to receive unfavorable results and instead aimed to incorporate such information into their lives via lifest","PeriodicalId":51757,"journal":{"name":"Interactive Journal of Medical Research","volume":"14 ","pages":"e65606"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2025-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12387377/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144978027","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Economic Evaluations and Equity in the Use of Artificial Intelligence in Imaging Examinations for Medical Diagnosis in People With Dermatological, Neurological, and Pulmonary Diseases: Systematic Review. 在皮肤、神经和肺部疾病患者的医学诊断影像学检查中使用人工智能的经济评估和公平性:系统综述。
IF 1.9 Q3 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL Pub Date : 2025-08-13 DOI: 10.2196/56240
Giulia Osório Santana, Rodrigo de Macedo Couto, Rafael Maffei Loureiro, Brunna Carolinne Rocha Silva Furriel, Luis Gustavo Nascimento de Paula, Edna Terezinha Rother, Joselisa Péres Queiroz de Paiva, Lucas Reis Correia
<p><strong>Background: </strong>Health care systems around the world face numerous challenges. Recent advances in artificial intelligence (AI) have offered promising solutions, particularly in diagnostic imaging.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This systematic review focused on evaluating the economic feasibility of AI in real-world diagnostic imaging scenarios, specifically for dermatological, neurological, and pulmonary diseases. The central question was whether the use of AI in these diagnostic assessments improves economic outcomes and promotes equity in health care systems.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This systematic review has 2 main components, economic evaluation and equity assessment. We used the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) tool to ensure adherence to best practices in systematic reviews. The protocol was registered with PROSPERO (International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews), and we followed the PRISMA-E (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses - Equity Extension) guidelines for equity. Scientific articles reporting on economic evaluations or equity considerations related to the use of AI-based tools in diagnostic imaging in dermatology, neurology, or pulmonology were included in the study. The search was conducted in the PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science databases. Methodological quality was assessed using the following checklists, CHEC (Consensus on Health Economic Criteria) for economic evaluations, EPHPP (Effective Public Health Practice Project) for equity evaluation studies, and Welte for transferability.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The systematic review identified 9 publications within the scope of the research question, with sample sizes ranging from 122 to over 1.3 million participants. The majority of studies addressed economic evaluation (88.9%), with most studies addressing pulmonary diseases (n=6; 66.6%), followed by neurological diseases (n=2; 22.3%), and only 1 (11.1%) study addressing dermatological diseases. These studies had an average quality access of 87.5% on the CHEC checklist. Only 2 studies were found to be transferable to Brazil and other countries with a similar health context. The economic evaluation revealed that 87.5% of studies highlighted the benefits of using AI in dermatology, neurology, and pulmonology, highlighting significant cost-effectiveness outcomes, with the most advantageous being a negative cost-effectiveness ratio of -US $27,580 per QALY (quality-adjusted life year) for melanoma diagnosis, indicating substantial cost savings in this scenario. The only study assessing equity, based on 129,819 radiographic images, identified AI-assisted underdiagnosis, particularly in certain subgroups defined by gender, ethnicity, and socioeconomic status.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This review underscores the importance of transparency in the description of AI tools and the representativeness of p
背景:世界各地的卫生保健系统面临着许多挑战。人工智能(AI)的最新进展提供了有前途的解决方案,特别是在诊断成像方面。目的:本系统综述的重点是评估人工智能在现实世界诊断成像场景中的经济可行性,特别是对皮肤、神经和肺部疾病的诊断。核心问题是,在这些诊断评估中使用人工智能是否能改善经济成果并促进卫生保健系统的公平性。方法:系统评价分为经济评价和公平评价两部分。我们使用PRISMA(用于系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目)工具来确保在系统评价中遵循最佳实践。该方案已在普洛斯彼罗(国际前瞻性系统评价登记册)注册,我们遵循PRISMA-E(系统评价和荟萃分析首选报告项目-公平扩展)公平指南。本研究纳入了关于在皮肤病学、神经病学或肺病学的诊断成像中使用基于人工智能的工具的经济评估或公平考虑的科学文章。在PubMed、Embase、Scopus和Web of Science数据库中进行了搜索。使用以下核对表评估方法学质量,经济评价采用CHEC(卫生经济标准共识),公平性评价研究采用EPHPP(有效公共卫生实践项目),可转移性采用Welte。结果:系统评价确定了研究问题范围内的9篇出版物,样本量从122万到130多万参与者不等。大多数研究涉及经济评价(88.9%),大多数研究涉及肺部疾病(n=6;66.6%),其次是神经系统疾病(n=2;22.3%),只有1项(11.1%)研究涉及皮肤病。这些研究在CHEC检查表上的平均质量访问率为87.5%。只有2项研究发现可转移到巴西和其他具有类似卫生背景的国家。经济评估显示,87.5%的研究强调了在皮肤病学、神经病学和肺病学中使用人工智能的好处,突出了显著的成本效益结果,最有利的是黑色素瘤诊断的每个质量调整生命年(QALY)的负成本效益比为- 27,580美元,表明在这种情况下节省了大量成本。唯一一项评估公平性的研究基于129,819张放射影像,确定了人工智能辅助的诊断不足,特别是在按性别、种族和社会经济地位定义的某些亚组中。结论:本综述强调了人工智能工具描述的透明度和人口亚组的代表性对于减轻健康差距的重要性。随着人工智能迅速融入医疗保健,无论社会人口因素如何,都必须进行详细评估,以确保所有患者都能受益。
{"title":"Economic Evaluations and Equity in the Use of Artificial Intelligence in Imaging Examinations for Medical Diagnosis in People With Dermatological, Neurological, and Pulmonary Diseases: Systematic Review.","authors":"Giulia Osório Santana, Rodrigo de Macedo Couto, Rafael Maffei Loureiro, Brunna Carolinne Rocha Silva Furriel, Luis Gustavo Nascimento de Paula, Edna Terezinha Rother, Joselisa Péres Queiroz de Paiva, Lucas Reis Correia","doi":"10.2196/56240","DOIUrl":"10.2196/56240","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Background: &lt;/strong&gt;Health care systems around the world face numerous challenges. Recent advances in artificial intelligence (AI) have offered promising solutions, particularly in diagnostic imaging.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Objective: &lt;/strong&gt;This systematic review focused on evaluating the economic feasibility of AI in real-world diagnostic imaging scenarios, specifically for dermatological, neurological, and pulmonary diseases. The central question was whether the use of AI in these diagnostic assessments improves economic outcomes and promotes equity in health care systems.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Methods: &lt;/strong&gt;This systematic review has 2 main components, economic evaluation and equity assessment. We used the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) tool to ensure adherence to best practices in systematic reviews. The protocol was registered with PROSPERO (International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews), and we followed the PRISMA-E (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses - Equity Extension) guidelines for equity. Scientific articles reporting on economic evaluations or equity considerations related to the use of AI-based tools in diagnostic imaging in dermatology, neurology, or pulmonology were included in the study. The search was conducted in the PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science databases. Methodological quality was assessed using the following checklists, CHEC (Consensus on Health Economic Criteria) for economic evaluations, EPHPP (Effective Public Health Practice Project) for equity evaluation studies, and Welte for transferability.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Results: &lt;/strong&gt;The systematic review identified 9 publications within the scope of the research question, with sample sizes ranging from 122 to over 1.3 million participants. The majority of studies addressed economic evaluation (88.9%), with most studies addressing pulmonary diseases (n=6; 66.6%), followed by neurological diseases (n=2; 22.3%), and only 1 (11.1%) study addressing dermatological diseases. These studies had an average quality access of 87.5% on the CHEC checklist. Only 2 studies were found to be transferable to Brazil and other countries with a similar health context. The economic evaluation revealed that 87.5% of studies highlighted the benefits of using AI in dermatology, neurology, and pulmonology, highlighting significant cost-effectiveness outcomes, with the most advantageous being a negative cost-effectiveness ratio of -US $27,580 per QALY (quality-adjusted life year) for melanoma diagnosis, indicating substantial cost savings in this scenario. The only study assessing equity, based on 129,819 radiographic images, identified AI-assisted underdiagnosis, particularly in certain subgroups defined by gender, ethnicity, and socioeconomic status.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Conclusions: &lt;/strong&gt;This review underscores the importance of transparency in the description of AI tools and the representativeness of p","PeriodicalId":51757,"journal":{"name":"Interactive Journal of Medical Research","volume":"14 ","pages":"e56240"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2025-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12349886/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144849592","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Digital Interventions for Improving Body Dissatisfaction in Children and Emerging Adults: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. 改善儿童和初成人身体不满的数字干预:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
IF 1.9 Q3 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL Pub Date : 2025-08-13 DOI: 10.2196/72231
Li Liu, Jianning Yang, Fengmei Tan, Xia Yang, Huan Luo, Yanhua Chen, Xiaolei Zhao

Background: Body dissatisfaction is a condition where individuals are dissatisfied with their physical appearance. It has become a global issue, especially among children and emerging adults. A growing number of digital interventions have been developed to address body dissatisfaction in children and emerging adults; however, controversies remain regarding their efficacy, underscoring the need for a comprehensive synthesis of current evidence.

Objective: This systematic review aimed to explore the effectiveness of digital interventions in improving body image-related outcomes among children and emerging adults.

Methods: From inception to April 24, 2024, a literature search was performed across 7 databases-PubMed, Web of Science, MEDLINE, EBSCO (Elton B Stephens Company), Cochrane Library, CNKI (China National Knowledge Infrastructure), and WANFANG-to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with a predefined set of inclusion criteria. This systematic review was reported in line with PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses) guidelines. Study selection, data extraction, and risk of bias assessment using the Cochrane Risk-of-Bias Tool 2.0 were conducted independently by 2 researchers. Standardized mean differences (SMDs) and 95% CIs from the included RCTs were calculated for the meta-analysis. Heterogeneity was assessed with I² values. A fixed-effects model was used when I²≤50%, and a random-effects model was selected when I²>50%.

Results: Twenty RCTs with 5251 participants (2610 in intervention groups and 2641 in control groups) met the inclusion criteria. Digital interventions included web pages, mobile apps, computer-based videos, computer-based sessions, internet-based sessions, internet games, chatbots, podcasts, and social media. Our results indicate that digital interventions could significantly improve body dissatisfaction (SMD=0.38, 95% CI -0.63 to -0.13; I2=55%; P=.003), physical appearance comparison (SMD=-0.24, 95% CI -0.45 to -0.03; I2=0%; P=.003), thin-ideal internalization (SMD=-0.28, 95% CI -0.36 to -0.2; I2=41%; P<.001), self-esteem (SMD=0.14, 95% CI 0.07-0.21; I2=21%; P<.001), self-compassion (SMD=0.55, 95% CI 0.33-0.78; I2=35%; P<.001), and depression (SMD=-0.59, 95% CI -0.97 to -0.21; I2=0%; P=.002), with small to medium effect sizes.

Conclusions: While digital interventions improved body dissatisfaction among children and emerging adults, additional well-designed, rigorous, and large-scale RCTs are needed to decisively provide estimates of the effectiveness of digital interventions on body dissatisfaction.

背景:身体不满是指个人对自己的外表不满意。它已经成为一个全球性的问题,尤其是在儿童和刚成年的人群中。越来越多的数字干预措施已经被开发出来,以解决儿童和新兴成年人对身体的不满;然而,关于其有效性的争议仍然存在,强调需要对现有证据进行全面综合。目的:本系统综述旨在探讨数字干预在改善儿童和初成人身体形象相关结果方面的有效性。方法:从研究开始到2024年4月24日,检索pubmed、Web of Science、MEDLINE、EBSCO (Elton B Stephens Company)、Cochrane图书馆、CNKI(中国知识基础设施)和万方等7个数据库进行文献检索,以确定具有预定义纳入标准的随机对照试验(RCTs)。该系统评价的报告符合PRISMA(系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目)指南。研究选择、数据提取和使用Cochrane风险偏倚工具2.0进行偏倚风险评估由2名研究人员独立进行。计算纳入的随机对照试验的标准化平均差异(SMDs)和95% ci进行meta分析。异质性评价采用I²值。当I²≤50%时采用固定效应模型,当I²大于等于50%时采用随机效应模型。结果:20项rct共5251名受试者(干预组2610名,对照组2641名)符合纳入标准。数字干预包括网页、移动应用程序、基于计算机的视频、基于计算机的会议、基于互联网的会议、网络游戏、聊天机器人、播客和社交媒体。我们的研究结果表明,数字干预可以显著改善身体不满(SMD=0.38, 95% CI -0.63 ~ -0.13;I2 = 55%;P= 0.003),体格外观比较(SMD=-0.24, 95% CI -0.45 ~ -0.03;I2 = 0%;P= 0.003),薄理想内化(SMD=-0.28, 95% CI -0.36 ~ -0.2;I2 = 41%;结论:虽然数字干预改善了儿童和初成人的身体不满意度,但需要更多精心设计、严格且大规模的随机对照试验来确定数字干预对身体不满意度的有效性。
{"title":"Digital Interventions for Improving Body Dissatisfaction in Children and Emerging Adults: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Li Liu, Jianning Yang, Fengmei Tan, Xia Yang, Huan Luo, Yanhua Chen, Xiaolei Zhao","doi":"10.2196/72231","DOIUrl":"10.2196/72231","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Body dissatisfaction is a condition where individuals are dissatisfied with their physical appearance. It has become a global issue, especially among children and emerging adults. A growing number of digital interventions have been developed to address body dissatisfaction in children and emerging adults; however, controversies remain regarding their efficacy, underscoring the need for a comprehensive synthesis of current evidence.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This systematic review aimed to explore the effectiveness of digital interventions in improving body image-related outcomes among children and emerging adults.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From inception to April 24, 2024, a literature search was performed across 7 databases-PubMed, Web of Science, MEDLINE, EBSCO (Elton B Stephens Company), Cochrane Library, CNKI (China National Knowledge Infrastructure), and WANFANG-to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with a predefined set of inclusion criteria. This systematic review was reported in line with PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses) guidelines. Study selection, data extraction, and risk of bias assessment using the Cochrane Risk-of-Bias Tool 2.0 were conducted independently by 2 researchers. Standardized mean differences (SMDs) and 95% CIs from the included RCTs were calculated for the meta-analysis. Heterogeneity was assessed with I² values. A fixed-effects model was used when I²≤50%, and a random-effects model was selected when I²>50%.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty RCTs with 5251 participants (2610 in intervention groups and 2641 in control groups) met the inclusion criteria. Digital interventions included web pages, mobile apps, computer-based videos, computer-based sessions, internet-based sessions, internet games, chatbots, podcasts, and social media. Our results indicate that digital interventions could significantly improve body dissatisfaction (SMD=0.38, 95% CI -0.63 to -0.13; I2=55%; P=.003), physical appearance comparison (SMD=-0.24, 95% CI -0.45 to -0.03; I2=0%; P=.003), thin-ideal internalization (SMD=-0.28, 95% CI -0.36 to -0.2; I2=41%; P<.001), self-esteem (SMD=0.14, 95% CI 0.07-0.21; I2=21%; P<.001), self-compassion (SMD=0.55, 95% CI 0.33-0.78; I2=35%; P<.001), and depression (SMD=-0.59, 95% CI -0.97 to -0.21; I2=0%; P=.002), with small to medium effect sizes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>While digital interventions improved body dissatisfaction among children and emerging adults, additional well-designed, rigorous, and large-scale RCTs are needed to decisively provide estimates of the effectiveness of digital interventions on body dissatisfaction.</p>","PeriodicalId":51757,"journal":{"name":"Interactive Journal of Medical Research","volume":"14 ","pages":"e72231"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2025-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12345061/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144838567","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Guideline-Based Digital Exercise Interventions for Reducing Body Weight and Fat and Promoting Physical Activity in Adults With Overweight and Obesity: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. 基于指南的数字运动干预在超重和肥胖成人中减少体重和脂肪并促进身体活动:系统回顾和荟萃分析
IF 1.9 Q3 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL Pub Date : 2025-08-07 DOI: 10.2196/73656
Mohamad Motevalli, Clemens Drenowatz, Derrick Tanous, Gerhard Ruedl, Werner Kirschner, Markus Schauer, Thomas Rosemann, Katharina Wirnitzer

Background: Digitally delivered physical exercise interventions are becoming increasingly popular in addressing the obesity epidemic. However, there remains uncertainty on their efficacy regarding the reduction of body weight (BW) and body fat, which may, at least partly, be due to variations in study designs and inconsistent adherence to international physical activity (PA) guidelines.

Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of digital exercise interventions based on PA guidelines in reducing BW and fat in adults with overweight or obesity, as well as their impact on PA-related factors.

Methods: This review was conducted following the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. Comprehensive searches were performed in October 2024 across PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Ovid MEDLINE databases. Eligible studies included adults (aged ≥18 years) with objectively confirmed overweight or obesity who used digital interventions aligned with international PA guidelines. Risk of bias was evaluated using the Cochrane Risk of Bias (version 2) tool for randomized controlled trials and the Risk of Bias in Nonrandomized Studies of Interventions tool for nonrandomized studies. A random-effects meta-analysis with Hartung-Knapp adjustment was performed using R software.

Results: Out of 4948 studies identified, 188 (3.8%) were screened in full and 30 (0.6%) met the eligibility criteria. Intervention durations ranged from 8 weeks to 24 months (average 6.4, SD 5.5 months). Meta-analysis showed that guideline-based digital exercise interventions significantly reduced BW compared to controls (mean difference [MD]=-1.17 kg; P=.003; I2=0.0%), with subgroup analysis revealing greater effects in active (nondigital) controls (MD=-1.23 kg; I2=7.5%) compared to passive (waitlist) controls (MD=-0.52 kg; I2=0.0%). A significant reduction in BMI was observed (MD=-0.50 kg/m2; P=.003), although with substantial heterogeneity (I2=70.0%), and subgroup analysis showed greater effects compared to passive controls (MD=-0.70 kg/m2; I2=43.1%) rather than to active controls (MD=-0.45 kg/m2; I2=74.5%). No significant effect was observed for body fat percentage overall (MD=-0.08%; P=.84; I2=7.4%). Qualitative analysis (including findings from noncomparative studies) showed that guideline-based digital exercise interventions led to significant reductions in BW (22/25, 88% studies; range -1.3 to -8.4 kg); BMI (19/23, 83% of studies; range -0.4 to -3.4 kg/m2); waist circumference (15/16, 94% of studies; range -2.1 to -9.2 cm), body fat percentage (9/9, 100% of studies; range -0.3% to -4.1%); and fat mass (7/7, 100% of studies; range -0.4 to -6.5 kg), while findings for waist-to-hip ratio and PA outcomes were inc

背景:数字化的体育锻炼干预措施在解决肥胖流行病方面越来越受欢迎。然而,它们在降低体重(BW)和体脂方面的功效仍然存在不确定性,这可能至少部分是由于研究设计的差异和对国际体育活动(PA)指南的不一致遵守。目的:本研究旨在评估基于PA指南的数字运动干预在超重或肥胖成人中降低体重和脂肪的有效性,以及它们对PA相关因素的影响。方法:本综述遵循PRISMA(系统评价和荟萃分析首选报告项目)指南进行。综合检索于2024年10月在PubMed、Cochrane Library、Web of Science和Ovid MEDLINE数据库中进行。符合条件的研究包括客观证实超重或肥胖的成年人(年龄≥18岁),并使用符合国际PA指南的数字干预措施。使用Cochrane随机对照试验的偏倚风险(版本2)工具和非随机干预研究的非随机研究的偏倚风险评估。采用R软件进行Hartung-Knapp调整的随机效应meta分析。结果:在4948项研究中,188项(3.8%)研究被完全筛选,30项(0.6%)研究符合入选标准。干预时间从8周到24个月不等(平均6.4个月,标准差5.5个月)。荟萃分析显示,与对照组相比,基于指南的数字运动干预显著降低了体重(平均差[MD]=-1.17 kg;P = .003;I2=0.0%),亚组分析显示主动(非数字)对照组(MD=-1.23 kg;I2=7.5%)与被动(等候名单)对照(MD=-0.52 kg;I2 = 0.0%)。BMI显著降低(MD=-0.50 kg/m2;P= 0.003),尽管存在很大的异质性(I2=70.0%),亚组分析显示与被动对照组相比,效果更大(MD=-0.70 kg/m2;I2=43.1%)而不是主动对照(MD=-0.45 kg/m2;I2 = 74.5%)。总体体脂率无显著影响(MD=-0.08%;P =点;I2 = 7.4%)。定性分析(包括非比较研究的结果)表明,基于指南的数字运动干预导致体重显著降低(22/ 25,88%的研究;-1.3至-8.4公斤);BMI(19/23, 83%的研究;-0.4至-3.4 kg/m2);腰围(15/16,94%的研究;范围-2.1到-9.2 cm),体脂率(9/9,100%的研究;-0.3%至-4.1%);脂肪量(7/7,100%的研究;范围为-0.4至-6.5 kg),而腰臀比和PA结果的研究结果不一致。结论:基于指南的数字PA和运动干预显示出减少超重或肥胖成人多余体重的潜力,与非数字干预相比,效果更强。然而,在BMI和身体成分方面,它们是否优于传统方法尚不确定。研究设计上的巨大差异给得出有效的数字锻炼工具的具体特征的明确结论带来了挑战。试验注册:PROSPERO CRD42024620020;https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD42024620020。
{"title":"Guideline-Based Digital Exercise Interventions for Reducing Body Weight and Fat and Promoting Physical Activity in Adults With Overweight and Obesity: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Mohamad Motevalli, Clemens Drenowatz, Derrick Tanous, Gerhard Ruedl, Werner Kirschner, Markus Schauer, Thomas Rosemann, Katharina Wirnitzer","doi":"10.2196/73656","DOIUrl":"10.2196/73656","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Digitally delivered physical exercise interventions are becoming increasingly popular in addressing the obesity epidemic. However, there remains uncertainty on their efficacy regarding the reduction of body weight (BW) and body fat, which may, at least partly, be due to variations in study designs and inconsistent adherence to international physical activity (PA) guidelines.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of digital exercise interventions based on PA guidelines in reducing BW and fat in adults with overweight or obesity, as well as their impact on PA-related factors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This review was conducted following the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. Comprehensive searches were performed in October 2024 across PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Ovid MEDLINE databases. Eligible studies included adults (aged ≥18 years) with objectively confirmed overweight or obesity who used digital interventions aligned with international PA guidelines. Risk of bias was evaluated using the Cochrane Risk of Bias (version 2) tool for randomized controlled trials and the Risk of Bias in Nonrandomized Studies of Interventions tool for nonrandomized studies. A random-effects meta-analysis with Hartung-Knapp adjustment was performed using R software.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 4948 studies identified, 188 (3.8%) were screened in full and 30 (0.6%) met the eligibility criteria. Intervention durations ranged from 8 weeks to 24 months (average 6.4, SD 5.5 months). Meta-analysis showed that guideline-based digital exercise interventions significantly reduced BW compared to controls (mean difference [MD]=-1.17 kg; P=.003; I<sup>2</sup>=0.0%), with subgroup analysis revealing greater effects in active (nondigital) controls (MD=-1.23 kg; I<sup>2</sup>=7.5%) compared to passive (waitlist) controls (MD=-0.52 kg; I<sup>2</sup>=0.0%). A significant reduction in BMI was observed (MD=-0.50 kg/m<sup>2</sup>; P=.003), although with substantial heterogeneity (I<sup>2</sup>=70.0%), and subgroup analysis showed greater effects compared to passive controls (MD=-0.70 kg/m<sup>2</sup>; I<sup>2</sup>=43.1%) rather than to active controls (MD=-0.45 kg/m<sup>2</sup>; I<sup>2</sup>=74.5%). No significant effect was observed for body fat percentage overall (MD=-0.08%; P=.84; I<sup>2</sup>=7.4%). Qualitative analysis (including findings from noncomparative studies) showed that guideline-based digital exercise interventions led to significant reductions in BW (22/25, 88% studies; range -1.3 to -8.4 kg); BMI (19/23, 83% of studies; range -0.4 to -3.4 kg/m<sup>2</sup>); waist circumference (15/16, 94% of studies; range -2.1 to -9.2 cm), body fat percentage (9/9, 100% of studies; range -0.3% to -4.1%); and fat mass (7/7, 100% of studies; range -0.4 to -6.5 kg), while findings for waist-to-hip ratio and PA outcomes were inc","PeriodicalId":51757,"journal":{"name":"Interactive Journal of Medical Research","volume":"14 ","pages":"e73656"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2025-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12371298/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144796089","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Cross-Platform Availability of Smartphone Sensors for Depression Indication Systems: Mixed-Methods Umbrella Review. 抑郁症指示系统智能手机传感器的跨平台可用性:混合方法综述。
IF 1.9 Q3 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL Pub Date : 2025-08-07 DOI: 10.2196/69686
Johannes Leimhofer, Milica Petrovic, Andreas Dominik, Dominik Heider, Ulrich Hegerl

Background: A popular trend in depression forecasting research is the development of machine learning models trained with various types of smartphone sensor data and periodic self-ratings to derive early indications of changes in depression severity. While most works focus on model performance, there is little concern about the universal usability and reliable operation of such systems across smartphone platforms. This review serves as foundational work for the MENTINA clinical trial, which investigates smartphone-based health self-management for depression. The usability and reliability of mobile apps for depression are commonly perceived through the lens of the approaches and interventions offered rather than the reliability of the built-in mobile phone functions to support effortless and exact delivery of intended interventions.

Objective: This work aimed to synthesize existing systematic reviews to identify smartphone sensor modalities used in mental health monitoring and, building on this foundation, assess the cross-platform availability of these data streams using PhoneDB to inform the design and implementation of digital depression indication systems.

Methods: To identify the already used hardware and software sensors and their purposes in mental health monitoring, an umbrella review was conducted. Three electronic databases, including PubMed, Web of Science Core Collection, and Scopus, were searched using smartphone, sensor data, and depression keyword combination to retrieve relevant literature reviews published within the last 5 years (2019-2024). Once the initial search was completed, the extracted hardware sensors were checked for availability on Android and iOS smartphones by analyzing device specifications in PhoneDB over the last 10 years.

Results: The extracted data streams observed across the 9 included studies covered 16 hardware and 3 software data streams. Hardware data streams included accelerometers, barometers, battery levels, Bluetooth, cameras, cellular networks, GPSs, gyroscopes, humidity, light sensors, magnetometers, proximity sensors, sound sensors, step counters, temperature sensors, and Wi-Fi. Software data streams included app usage, call and message logs, and screen status. Hardware component availability on Android and iOS systems showed the changes in component trends from 2014 to 2024 as of September 2024, with the accelerometers, batteries, cameras, and GPSs remaining consistent on Android and iOS, while components such as gyroscopes, step counters, and barometers gradually increased over the years, particularly on Android.

Conclusions: Multiple data streams identified in the literature review showed a consistent increase in availability over time, enabling improved use of these outputs for depression forecasting and the training of machine learning models with diverse smartphone data, including sen

背景:抑郁症预测研究的一个流行趋势是发展机器学习模型,该模型使用各种类型的智能手机传感器数据和定期自我评分进行训练,以获得抑郁症严重程度变化的早期迹象。虽然大多数工作都集中在模型性能上,但很少关注这些系统在智能手机平台上的普遍可用性和可靠操作。这篇综述是MENTINA临床试验的基础工作,该试验研究基于智能手机的抑郁症健康自我管理。抑郁症手机应用程序的可用性和可靠性通常是通过提供的方法和干预措施来感知的,而不是通过内置手机功能的可靠性来支持轻松准确地提供预期的干预措施。目的:本工作旨在综合现有的系统综述,以确定用于心理健康监测的智能手机传感器模式,并在此基础上,利用PhoneDB评估这些数据流的跨平台可用性,为数字抑郁指示系统的设计和实施提供信息。方法:对已使用的硬件和软件传感器及其在心理健康监测中的用途进行综述。利用智能手机、传感器数据和抑郁症关键词组合对PubMed、Web of Science Core Collection、Scopus 3个电子数据库进行检索,检索近5年(2019-2024)发表的相关文献综述。一旦初始搜索完成,提取的硬件传感器将通过分析PhoneDB过去10年的设备规格来检查Android和iOS智能手机的可用性。结果:在9个纳入的研究中观察到的提取数据流涵盖了16个硬件数据流和3个软件数据流。硬件数据流包括加速度计、气压计、电池电量、蓝牙、摄像头、蜂窝网络、gps、陀螺仪、湿度、光传感器、磁力计、接近传感器、声音传感器、计步器、温度传感器和Wi-Fi。软件数据流包括应用程序使用情况、通话和消息日志以及屏幕状态。截至2024年9月,Android和iOS系统上的硬件组件可用性显示了2014年至2024年组件趋势的变化,其中加速计,电池,相机和gps在Android和iOS上保持一致,而陀螺仪,计步器和气压计等组件多年来逐渐增加,特别是在Android上。结论:在文献综述中发现的多个数据流显示,随着时间的推移,可用性持续增加,可以更好地利用这些输出进行抑郁症预测,并使用各种智能手机数据(包括传感器衍生信息)训练机器学习模型。为了在心理健康领域使用更精确和可靠的数据,特别是在跟踪和预测抑郁症严重程度变化等关键领域,需要进一步研究简化不同移动硬件和软件配置的智能手机数据,以便为数字心理健康目的提供可靠的输出。
{"title":"Cross-Platform Availability of Smartphone Sensors for Depression Indication Systems: Mixed-Methods Umbrella Review.","authors":"Johannes Leimhofer, Milica Petrovic, Andreas Dominik, Dominik Heider, Ulrich Hegerl","doi":"10.2196/69686","DOIUrl":"10.2196/69686","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A popular trend in depression forecasting research is the development of machine learning models trained with various types of smartphone sensor data and periodic self-ratings to derive early indications of changes in depression severity. While most works focus on model performance, there is little concern about the universal usability and reliable operation of such systems across smartphone platforms. This review serves as foundational work for the MENTINA clinical trial, which investigates smartphone-based health self-management for depression. The usability and reliability of mobile apps for depression are commonly perceived through the lens of the approaches and interventions offered rather than the reliability of the built-in mobile phone functions to support effortless and exact delivery of intended interventions.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This work aimed to synthesize existing systematic reviews to identify smartphone sensor modalities used in mental health monitoring and, building on this foundation, assess the cross-platform availability of these data streams using PhoneDB to inform the design and implementation of digital depression indication systems.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>To identify the already used hardware and software sensors and their purposes in mental health monitoring, an umbrella review was conducted. Three electronic databases, including PubMed, Web of Science Core Collection, and Scopus, were searched using smartphone, sensor data, and depression keyword combination to retrieve relevant literature reviews published within the last 5 years (2019-2024). Once the initial search was completed, the extracted hardware sensors were checked for availability on Android and iOS smartphones by analyzing device specifications in PhoneDB over the last 10 years.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The extracted data streams observed across the 9 included studies covered 16 hardware and 3 software data streams. Hardware data streams included accelerometers, barometers, battery levels, Bluetooth, cameras, cellular networks, GPSs, gyroscopes, humidity, light sensors, magnetometers, proximity sensors, sound sensors, step counters, temperature sensors, and Wi-Fi. Software data streams included app usage, call and message logs, and screen status. Hardware component availability on Android and iOS systems showed the changes in component trends from 2014 to 2024 as of September 2024, with the accelerometers, batteries, cameras, and GPSs remaining consistent on Android and iOS, while components such as gyroscopes, step counters, and barometers gradually increased over the years, particularly on Android.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Multiple data streams identified in the literature review showed a consistent increase in availability over time, enabling improved use of these outputs for depression forecasting and the training of machine learning models with diverse smartphone data, including sen","PeriodicalId":51757,"journal":{"name":"Interactive Journal of Medical Research","volume":"14 ","pages":"e69686"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2025-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12371283/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144800887","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Detection of Chronic Cognitive-Motor Deficits in Adults With a History of Concussion Using Computerized Eye-Hand Coordination Tasks: Preliminary Experimental Design Study. 使用计算机眼手协调任务检测有脑震荡史的成人慢性认知运动缺陷:初步实验设计研究。
IF 1.9 Q3 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL Pub Date : 2025-08-05 DOI: 10.2196/70867
Qin Zhu, Shaochen Huang
<p><strong>Background: </strong>Concussion has been a major public health concern due to the substantial cognitive sequelae it results. Although the dysfunctions of the frontal lobe and corpus callosum owing to concussions have been documented, the existing concussion screening tools merely examine cognitive functions in isolation of motor functions and failed to detect the chronic cognitive-motor impairments following concussions. Yet, there has been no concussion screening test aimed specifically to assess the coupled cognitive-motor functions.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to provide preliminary evidence for using computerized eye-hand coordination tasks to detect chronic cognitive-motor deficits associated with concussion history.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The computerized eye-hand coordination tasks were used to assess the coupled cognitive-motor functions of the participants with and with no history of concussion. In experiment 1, a total of 12 participants (6 young adults with a history of concussion and 6 healthy controls) completed longitudinal assessments of coordination profiles across a year. Experiment 2 examined a total of 20 participants (10 participants with a history of concussion and 10 healthy controls) using an iterated single-session protocol. Just noticeable difference (JND) and proportion of time-on-task (PTT) were used to assess cognitive-motor performance. Mixed-design ANOVAs were used to examine group differences, and the effect sizes were assessed using Cohen d test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In experiment 1, participants with a history of concussion exhibited more inconsistent ability to visually discriminate the in-phase coordination pattern (coefficient of variation of JND: participants with a history of concussion = mean 0.27, SD 0.04, and healthy controls = mean 0.17, SD 0.07; t10=2.93; P=.02). Similarly, their performance on unimanual and bimanual in-phase and anti-phase coordination patterns was significantly poorer (at in-phase: PTTConcussed=mean 0.63, SD 0.10, and PTTHealthy=mean 0.73, SD 0.08 [F1,10=8.49; P=.02]; at anti-phase: PTTConcussed=mean 0.46, SD 0.14, and PTTHealthy=mean 0.60, SD 0.10 [F1,10=10.67; P=.008]). In experiment, 2 where only the unimanual coordination tasks were implemented for screening, participants with a history of concussion showed impaired performance in both in-phase and anti-phase tasks (at in-phase: PTTConcussed=mean 0.62, SD 0.13, and PTTHealthy=mean 0.74, SD 0.07 [F1,54=4.20; P=.045]; at anti-phase: PTTConcussed=mean 0.37, SD 0.15, and PTTHealthy=mean 0.56, SD 0.14 [F1,54=10.26; P=.002]), and they also failed to show the differentiated performance between anti-phase and 90° coordination patterns (PTTAnti-phase=mean 0.37, SD 0.15, and PTT90° coordination=mean 0.37, SD 0.13).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Due to their ability to detect both impaired and undifferentiated performance in producing intrinsic and novel coordination patterns, the un
背景:脑震荡是一个主要的公共卫生问题,因为它导致大量的认知后遗症。虽然有文献记载脑震荡导致的额叶和胼胝体功能障碍,但现有的脑震荡筛查工具仅仅是在分离运动功能的情况下检查认知功能,未能发现脑震荡后的慢性认知运动损伤。然而,目前还没有专门针对评估认知-运动耦合功能的脑震荡筛查测试。目的:本研究旨在为使用计算机化的手眼协调任务检测与脑震荡病史相关的慢性认知运动缺陷提供初步证据。方法:采用计算机眼-手协调任务评估有和无脑震荡史的参与者的认知-运动功能。在实验1中,共有12名参与者(6名有脑震荡病史的年轻人和6名健康对照者)完成了一年内协调性的纵向评估。实验二采用重复的单次实验方案对20名参与者(10名有脑震荡病史的参与者和10名健康对照者)进行了检查。仅显着差异(JND)和任务完成时间比例(PTT)用于评估认知运动表现。采用混合设计方差分析检验组间差异,效应量采用Cohen d检验。结果:在实验1中,有脑震荡史的被试表现出更不一致的相协调模式视觉识别能力(JND变异系数:有脑震荡史的被试=平均0.27,SD 0.04,健康对照组=平均0.17,SD 0.07;t10 = 2.93;P = .02点)。同样,它们在单手和双手的同相和反相协调模式上的表现也明显较差(同相:pttconsed =平均0.63,SD 0.10, PTTHealthy=平均0.73,SD 0.08;P = 02];反相:pttconsed =mean 0.46, SD 0.14, PTTHealthy=mean 0.60, SD 0.10 [F1,10=10.67;P = .008])。在实验2中,仅使用手动协调任务进行筛选,有脑震荡史的参与者在同相和反相任务中的表现都受到损害(在同相:pttconsed =平均0.62,SD 0.13, PTTHealthy=平均0.74,SD 0.07;P = .045];反相:pttconsed =mean 0.37, SD 0.15, PTTHealthy=mean 0.56, SD 0.14 [F1,54=10.26;P=.002]),而且它们也未能显示反相位和90°配位模式之间的差异性能(PTTAnti-phase=mean 0.37, SD 0.15, PTT90°配位=mean 0.37, SD 0.13)。结论:由于它们能够检测出受损和未分化的表现,产生固有的和新的协调模式,单一的协调任务似乎是一个敏感的筛选工具,慢性认知运动障碍与脑震荡的历史相关。
{"title":"Detection of Chronic Cognitive-Motor Deficits in Adults With a History of Concussion Using Computerized Eye-Hand Coordination Tasks: Preliminary Experimental Design Study.","authors":"Qin Zhu, Shaochen Huang","doi":"10.2196/70867","DOIUrl":"10.2196/70867","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Background: &lt;/strong&gt;Concussion has been a major public health concern due to the substantial cognitive sequelae it results. Although the dysfunctions of the frontal lobe and corpus callosum owing to concussions have been documented, the existing concussion screening tools merely examine cognitive functions in isolation of motor functions and failed to detect the chronic cognitive-motor impairments following concussions. Yet, there has been no concussion screening test aimed specifically to assess the coupled cognitive-motor functions.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Objective: &lt;/strong&gt;This study aimed to provide preliminary evidence for using computerized eye-hand coordination tasks to detect chronic cognitive-motor deficits associated with concussion history.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Methods: &lt;/strong&gt;The computerized eye-hand coordination tasks were used to assess the coupled cognitive-motor functions of the participants with and with no history of concussion. In experiment 1, a total of 12 participants (6 young adults with a history of concussion and 6 healthy controls) completed longitudinal assessments of coordination profiles across a year. Experiment 2 examined a total of 20 participants (10 participants with a history of concussion and 10 healthy controls) using an iterated single-session protocol. Just noticeable difference (JND) and proportion of time-on-task (PTT) were used to assess cognitive-motor performance. Mixed-design ANOVAs were used to examine group differences, and the effect sizes were assessed using Cohen d test.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Results: &lt;/strong&gt;In experiment 1, participants with a history of concussion exhibited more inconsistent ability to visually discriminate the in-phase coordination pattern (coefficient of variation of JND: participants with a history of concussion = mean 0.27, SD 0.04, and healthy controls = mean 0.17, SD 0.07; t10=2.93; P=.02). Similarly, their performance on unimanual and bimanual in-phase and anti-phase coordination patterns was significantly poorer (at in-phase: PTTConcussed=mean 0.63, SD 0.10, and PTTHealthy=mean 0.73, SD 0.08 [F1,10=8.49; P=.02]; at anti-phase: PTTConcussed=mean 0.46, SD 0.14, and PTTHealthy=mean 0.60, SD 0.10 [F1,10=10.67; P=.008]). In experiment, 2 where only the unimanual coordination tasks were implemented for screening, participants with a history of concussion showed impaired performance in both in-phase and anti-phase tasks (at in-phase: PTTConcussed=mean 0.62, SD 0.13, and PTTHealthy=mean 0.74, SD 0.07 [F1,54=4.20; P=.045]; at anti-phase: PTTConcussed=mean 0.37, SD 0.15, and PTTHealthy=mean 0.56, SD 0.14 [F1,54=10.26; P=.002]), and they also failed to show the differentiated performance between anti-phase and 90° coordination patterns (PTTAnti-phase=mean 0.37, SD 0.15, and PTT90° coordination=mean 0.37, SD 0.13).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Conclusions: &lt;/strong&gt;Due to their ability to detect both impaired and undifferentiated performance in producing intrinsic and novel coordination patterns, the un","PeriodicalId":51757,"journal":{"name":"Interactive Journal of Medical Research","volume":"14 ","pages":"e70867"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2025-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12324898/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144790638","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Interactive Journal of Medical Research
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1