首页 > 最新文献

Pain Reports最新文献

英文 中文
Distinct trajectories of caregiver-toddler physiological attunement during routine vaccinations. 照料者幼儿在常规疫苗接种过程中生理协调的不同轨迹。
IF 3.4 Q2 NEUROSCIENCES Pub Date : 2023-05-23 eCollection Date: 2023-05-01 DOI: 10.1097/PR9.0000000000001077
Miranda G Di Lorenzo-Klas, Jordana A Waxman, David B Flora, Louis A Schmidt, Hartley Garfield, Dan Flanders, Eitan Weinberg, Deena Savlov, Rebecca R Pillai Riddell

Introduction: Toddlers rely on their caregivers for regulatory support when faced with pain-related distress. The caregiver's ability to support their toddler relies on their capacity to regulate their own distress and respond effectively to the child's need for support. The aim of the current study was to describe patterns of caregiver-toddler physiological co-regulatory patterns, also known as attunement, during routine vaccinations across the second year of life.

Methods: Caregiver-toddler dyads (N = 189) were part of a longitudinal cohort observed at either 12-, 18-, or 24-month well-baby vaccinations. Parallel-process growth-mixture modeling was used to examine patterns of dyadic physiological co-regulatory responses, indexed by high-frequency heart rate variability (HF-HRV).

Results: Three groups of dyads were discerned. The largest group (approximately 80%) demonstrated physiological attunement, with a stable and parallel regulatory pattern of HF-HRV from baseline to postneedle. The second group (7.9%) had parallel regulatory trajectories but with notably lower (ie, less regulated) HF-HRV values, which indicates independent regulatory responses (ie, a lack of attunement among dyad members). The third group (11.1%) showed diverging regulatory trajectories: Caregivers showed a stable regulatory trajectory, but toddlers demonstrated a steep decrease followed by an increase in HF-HRV values that surpassed their baseline levels by the third minute postneedle. Post hoc analyses with the HF-HRV groupings explored heart rate patterns and potential predictors.

Conclusions: These findings elucidate potential adaptive and maladaptive co-regulatory parasympathetic patterns in an acute pain context.

引言:当幼儿面临与疼痛相关的痛苦时,他们依赖于照顾者的监管支持。照顾者支持幼儿的能力取决于他们调节自己痛苦的能力,以及对孩子的支持需求做出有效反应的能力。目前这项研究的目的是描述在第二年的常规疫苗接种过程中,照顾幼儿的生理共调节模式,也称为协调。方法:在12个月、18个月或24个月的婴儿接种疫苗时,护理人员和幼儿二人组(N=189)是纵向队列的一部分。使用平行过程生长混合物建模来检查以高频心率变异性(HF-HRV)为指标的二元生理共调节反应模式。结果:区分了三组二元。最大的一组(约80%)表现出生理调谐,从基线到针后HF-HRV具有稳定和平行的调节模式。第二组(7.9%)具有平行的调节轨迹,但HF-HRV值明显较低(即调节较少),这表明独立的调节反应(即二元组成员之间缺乏协调)。第三组(11.1%)表现出不同的调节轨迹:护理人员表现出稳定的调节轨迹,但学步儿童表现出急剧下降,随后HF-HRV值增加,在注射后第三分钟超过了基线水平。HF-HRV分组的事后分析探讨了心率模式和潜在的预测因素。结论:这些发现阐明了急性疼痛环境中潜在的适应性和不适应性协同调节副交感神经模式。
{"title":"Distinct trajectories of caregiver-toddler physiological attunement during routine vaccinations.","authors":"Miranda G Di Lorenzo-Klas, Jordana A Waxman, David B Flora, Louis A Schmidt, Hartley Garfield, Dan Flanders, Eitan Weinberg, Deena Savlov, Rebecca R Pillai Riddell","doi":"10.1097/PR9.0000000000001077","DOIUrl":"10.1097/PR9.0000000000001077","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Toddlers rely on their caregivers for regulatory support when faced with pain-related distress. The caregiver's ability to support their toddler relies on their capacity to regulate their own distress and respond effectively to the child's need for support. The aim of the current study was to describe patterns of caregiver-toddler physiological co-regulatory patterns, also known as attunement, during routine vaccinations across the second year of life.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Caregiver-toddler dyads (N = 189) were part of a longitudinal cohort observed at either 12-, 18-, or 24-month well-baby vaccinations. Parallel-process growth-mixture modeling was used to examine patterns of dyadic physiological co-regulatory responses, indexed by high-frequency heart rate variability (HF-HRV).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Three groups of dyads were discerned. The largest group (approximately 80%) demonstrated physiological attunement, with a stable and parallel regulatory pattern of HF-HRV from baseline to postneedle. The second group (7.9%) had parallel regulatory trajectories but with notably lower (ie, less regulated) HF-HRV values, which indicates independent regulatory responses (ie, a lack of attunement among dyad members). The third group (11.1%) showed diverging regulatory trajectories: Caregivers showed a stable regulatory trajectory, but toddlers demonstrated a steep decrease followed by an increase in HF-HRV values that surpassed their baseline levels by the third minute postneedle. Post hoc analyses with the HF-HRV groupings explored heart rate patterns and potential predictors.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings elucidate potential adaptive and maladaptive co-regulatory parasympathetic patterns in an acute pain context.</p>","PeriodicalId":52189,"journal":{"name":"Pain Reports","volume":"8 3","pages":"e1077"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2023-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/97/9f/painreports-8-e1077.PMC10508426.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41156359","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Effectiveness of psychological interventions delivered by physiotherapists in the management of neck pain: a systematic review with meta-analysis. 理疗师实施心理干预治疗颈部疼痛的有效性:一项荟萃分析系统综述。
IF 4.8 Q2 NEUROSCIENCES Pub Date : 2023-05-23 eCollection Date: 2023-05-01 DOI: 10.1097/PR9.0000000000001076
Scott F Farrell, Devon Edmunds, John Fletcher, Harry Martine, Hashem Mohamed, Jenna Liimatainen, Michele Sterling

Physiotherapists are increasingly using psychological treatments for musculoskeletal conditions. We assessed the effects of physiotherapist-delivered psychological interventions on pain, disability, and quality of life in neck pain. We evaluated quality of intervention reporting. We searched databases for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comprising individuals with acute or chronic whiplash-associated disorder (WAD) or nontraumatic neck pain (NTNP), comparing physiotherapist-delivered psychological interventions to standard care or no treatment. Data were extracted regarding study characteristics and outcomes. Standardised mean difference (SMD) was calculated by random-effects meta-analysis. We evaluated certainty of evidence using Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) and intervention reporting using TIDieR. Fourteen RCTs (18 articles-4 detail additional outcome/follow-up data) were included comprising 2028 patients, examining acute WAD (n = 4), subacute/mixed NTNP (n = 3), chronic WAD (n = 2), and chronic NTNP (n = 5). Treatment effects on pain favoured psychological interventions in chronic NTNP at short-term (SMD -0.40 [95% CI -0.73, -0.07]), medium-term (SMD -0.29 [95% CI -0.57, 0.00]), and long-term (SMD -0.32 [95% CI -0.60, -0.05]) follow-up. For disability, effects favoured psychological interventions in acute WAD at short-term follow-up (SMD -0.39 [95% CI -0.72, -0.07]) and chronic NTNP at short-term (SMD -0.53 [95% CI -0.91, -0.15]), medium-term (SMD -0.49 [95% CI -0.77, -0.21]), and long-term (SMD -0.60 [95% CI -0.94, -0.26]) follow-up. GRADE ratings were typically moderate, and intervention reporting often lacked provision of trial materials and procedural descriptions. Psychological interventions delivered by physiotherapists were more effective than standard physiotherapy for chronic NTNP (small-to-medium effects) and, in the short term, acute WAD.

物理治疗师越来越多地使用心理治疗来治疗肌肉骨骼疾病。我们评估了理疗师提供的心理干预对颈部疼痛的疼痛、残疾和生活质量的影响。我们评估了干预报告的质量。我们搜索了随机对照试验(RCT)的数据库,这些试验包括患有急性或慢性挥鞭相关疾病(WAD)或非创伤性颈部疼痛(NTNP)的个体,将理疗师提供的心理干预与标准护理或不治疗进行比较。提取了有关研究特征和结果的数据。通过随机效应荟萃分析计算标准化平均差(SMD)。我们使用推荐、评估、发展和评估等级(GRADE)评估证据的确定性,并使用TIDieR进行干预报告。纳入了14项随机对照试验(18篇文章-4详细说明了额外的结果/随访数据),包括2028名患者,检查急性WAD(n=4)、亚急性/混合NTNP(n=3)、慢性WAD(n=2)和慢性NTNP(n=5)。在短期(SMD-0.40[95%CI-0.73,-0.07])、中期(SMD 0.29[95%CI-0.57,0.00])和长期(SMD 0.32[95%CI 0.60,-0.05])随访中,对疼痛的治疗效果有利于慢性NTNP的心理干预。对于残疾,影响有利于在短期随访中对急性WAD进行心理干预(SMD-0.39[95%CI-0.72,-0.07]),在短期随访(SMD-0.53[95%CI-0.11,-0.15])、中期随访(SMD-0.49[95%CI-0.57,-0.21])和长期随访(SMD-0.60[95%CI 0.94,-0.26])对慢性NTNP进行心理干预。GRADE评级通常是中等的,干预报告通常缺乏试验材料和程序描述。物理治疗师提供的心理干预对慢性NTNP(中小型影响)和短期急性WAD比标准物理治疗更有效。
{"title":"Effectiveness of psychological interventions delivered by physiotherapists in the management of neck pain: a systematic review with meta-analysis.","authors":"Scott F Farrell,&nbsp;Devon Edmunds,&nbsp;John Fletcher,&nbsp;Harry Martine,&nbsp;Hashem Mohamed,&nbsp;Jenna Liimatainen,&nbsp;Michele Sterling","doi":"10.1097/PR9.0000000000001076","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PR9.0000000000001076","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Physiotherapists are increasingly using psychological treatments for musculoskeletal conditions. We assessed the effects of physiotherapist-delivered psychological interventions on pain, disability, and quality of life in neck pain. We evaluated quality of intervention reporting. We searched databases for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comprising individuals with acute or chronic whiplash-associated disorder (WAD) or nontraumatic neck pain (NTNP), comparing physiotherapist-delivered psychological interventions to standard care or no treatment. Data were extracted regarding study characteristics and outcomes. Standardised mean difference (SMD) was calculated by random-effects meta-analysis. We evaluated certainty of evidence using Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) and intervention reporting using TIDieR. Fourteen RCTs (18 articles-4 detail additional outcome/follow-up data) were included comprising 2028 patients, examining acute WAD (n = 4), subacute/mixed NTNP (n = 3), chronic WAD (n = 2), and chronic NTNP (n = 5). Treatment effects on pain favoured psychological interventions in chronic NTNP at short-term (SMD -0.40 [95% CI -0.73, -0.07]), medium-term (SMD -0.29 [95% CI -0.57, 0.00]), and long-term (SMD -0.32 [95% CI -0.60, -0.05]) follow-up. For disability, effects favoured psychological interventions in acute WAD at short-term follow-up (SMD -0.39 [95% CI -0.72, -0.07]) and chronic NTNP at short-term (SMD -0.53 [95% CI -0.91, -0.15]), medium-term (SMD -0.49 [95% CI -0.77, -0.21]), and long-term (SMD -0.60 [95% CI -0.94, -0.26]) follow-up. GRADE ratings were typically moderate, and intervention reporting often lacked provision of trial materials and procedural descriptions. Psychological interventions delivered by physiotherapists were more effective than standard physiotherapy for chronic NTNP (small-to-medium effects) and, in the short term, acute WAD.</p>","PeriodicalId":52189,"journal":{"name":"Pain Reports","volume":"8 3","pages":"e1076"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8,"publicationDate":"2023-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/88/40/painreports-8-e1076.PMC10508403.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41158108","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Prevalence of postoperative pain after hospital discharge: systematic review and meta-analysis. 出院后术后疼痛的患病率:系统综述和荟萃分析。
IF 3.4 Q2 NEUROSCIENCES Pub Date : 2023-05-08 eCollection Date: 2023-05-01 DOI: 10.1097/PR9.0000000000001075
Rex Park, Mohammed Mohiuddin, Ramiro Arellano, Esther Pogatzki-Zahn, Gregory Klar, Ian Gilron

Assessment and management of postoperative pain after hospital discharge is very challenging. We conducted a systematic review to synthesize available evidence on the prevalence of moderate-to-severe postoperative pain within the first 1 to 14 days after hospital discharge. The previously published protocol for this review was registered in PROSPERO. MEDLINE and EMBASE databases were searched until November 2020. We included observational postsurgical pain studies in the posthospital discharge setting. The primary outcome for the review was the proportion of study participants with moderate-to-severe postoperative pain (eg, pain score of 4 or more on a 10-point Numerical Rating Scale) within the first 1 to 14 days after hospital discharge. This review included 27 eligible studies involving a total of 22,108 participants having undergone a wide variety of surgical procedures. The 27 studies included ambulatory surgeries (n = 19), inpatient surgeries (n = 1), both ambulatory and inpatient surgeries (n = 4), or was not specified (n = 3). Meta-analyses of combinable studies provided estimates of pooled prevalence rates of moderate-to-severe postoperative pain ranging from 31% 1 day after discharge to 58% 1 to 2 weeks after discharge. These findings suggest that moderate-to-severe postoperative pain is a common occurrence after hospital discharge and highlight the importance of future efforts to more effectively evaluate, prevent, and treat postsurgical pain in patients discharged from the hospital.

出院后术后疼痛的评估和管理是非常具有挑战性的。我们进行了一项系统综述,以综合关于出院后前1至14天内中重度术后疼痛发生率的现有证据。本次审查之前公布的方案已在PROSPERO注册。MEDLINE和EMBASE数据库一直搜索到2020年11月。我们纳入了在出院后环境中进行的观察性术后疼痛研究。审查的主要结果是研究参与者在出院后的前1至14天内出现中度至重度术后疼痛的比例(例如,在10分数值评定量表上疼痛评分为4分或以上)。这项综述包括27项符合条件的研究,共有22108名参与者接受了各种各样的手术。27项研究包括门诊手术(n=19)、住院手术(n=1)、门诊和住院手术(n=4),或未指定(n=3)。可组合研究的荟萃分析估计了中度至重度术后疼痛的合并患病率,从出院后1天的31%到出院后1至2周的58%。这些发现表明,中度至重度术后疼痛在出院后很常见,并强调了未来努力更有效地评估、预防和治疗出院患者术后疼痛的重要性。
{"title":"Prevalence of postoperative pain after hospital discharge: systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Rex Park, Mohammed Mohiuddin, Ramiro Arellano, Esther Pogatzki-Zahn, Gregory Klar, Ian Gilron","doi":"10.1097/PR9.0000000000001075","DOIUrl":"10.1097/PR9.0000000000001075","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Assessment and management of postoperative pain after hospital discharge is very challenging. We conducted a systematic review to synthesize available evidence on the prevalence of moderate-to-severe postoperative pain within the first 1 to 14 days after hospital discharge. The previously published protocol for this review was registered in PROSPERO. MEDLINE and EMBASE databases were searched until November 2020. We included observational postsurgical pain studies in the posthospital discharge setting. The primary outcome for the review was the proportion of study participants with moderate-to-severe postoperative pain (eg, pain score of 4 or more on a 10-point Numerical Rating Scale) within the first 1 to 14 days after hospital discharge. This review included 27 eligible studies involving a total of 22,108 participants having undergone a wide variety of surgical procedures. The 27 studies included ambulatory surgeries (n = 19), inpatient surgeries (n = 1), both ambulatory and inpatient surgeries (n = 4), or was not specified (n = 3). Meta-analyses of combinable studies provided estimates of pooled prevalence rates of moderate-to-severe postoperative pain ranging from 31% 1 day after discharge to 58% 1 to 2 weeks after discharge. These findings suggest that moderate-to-severe postoperative pain is a common occurrence after hospital discharge and highlight the importance of future efforts to more effectively evaluate, prevent, and treat postsurgical pain in patients discharged from the hospital.</p>","PeriodicalId":52189,"journal":{"name":"Pain Reports","volume":"8 3","pages":"e1075"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2023-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/ec/30/painreports-8-e1075.PMC10168527.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9462434","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Waste not, want not: upcycling research data from chronic pain trials. 不浪费,不匮乏:从慢性疼痛试验中升级研究数据。
IF 4.8 Q2 NEUROSCIENCES Pub Date : 2023-05-01 DOI: 10.1097/PR9.0000000000001070
Anna Woodbury

Jacobsen SM, Moore T, Douglas A, Lester D, Johnson AL, Vassar M. Discontinuation and nonpublication analysis of chronic pain randomized controlled trials. PAIN Rep 2023;8:e1069.

Jacobsen SM, Moore T, Douglas A, Lester D, Johnson AL, Vassar M.慢性疼痛随机对照试验的停药分析。疼痛报告2023;8:e1069。
{"title":"Waste not, want not: upcycling research data from chronic pain trials.","authors":"Anna Woodbury","doi":"10.1097/PR9.0000000000001070","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PR9.0000000000001070","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Jacobsen SM, Moore T, Douglas A, Lester D, Johnson AL, Vassar M. Discontinuation and nonpublication analysis of chronic pain randomized controlled trials. PAIN Rep 2023;8:e1069.</p>","PeriodicalId":52189,"journal":{"name":"Pain Reports","volume":"8 3","pages":"e1070"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/85/bb/painreports-8-e1070.PMC10079333.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9976834","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Discontinuation and nonpublication analysis of chronic pain randomized controlled trials. 慢性疼痛随机对照试验的中止和非发表分析。
IF 4.8 Q2 NEUROSCIENCES Pub Date : 2023-05-01 DOI: 10.1097/PR9.0000000000001069
Samuel M Jacobsen, Ty Moore, Alexander Douglas, Drew Lester, Austin L Johnson, Matt Vassar

Introduction: The primary objective of this cross-sectional analysis is to evaluate rates of discontinuation and nonpublication of Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of therapeutic interventions to treat chronic pain.

Methods: Using ClinicalTrials.gov, a sample was obtained which included clinical trials pertaining to chronic pain. Trials were analyzed for publication status and completion status of each trial. If information was unavailable on the trial registry database, or could not be allocated through a systematic search, the corresponding trialist was contacted and data points were gathered.

Results: In our final analysis of the 408 RCTs, we found that 281 (68.9%) were published in a peer-reviewed journal and 127 (31.1%) were unpublished trials. Of 112 discontinued trials, 59 (52.7%) reached publication. In addition, 221 of 296 completed trials (74.7%) were published, and 75 (25.3%) remained unpublished after trial completion. The most common listed reason for trial discontinuation was administrative recommendations (41 of 71 trials [57.7%]), while not receiving an email reply to our standardized email from the corresponding trialist was the most common result for trial nonpublication (49 of 88 trials [55.7%]). Clinical trials funded by nonindustry sponsors were more likely to reach publication than industry-funded clinical trials (unadjusted odds ratio 1.86 [95% CI, 1.18-2.95]; adjusted odds ratio 3.01 [95% CI, 1.76-5.14]).

Conclusion: The rate of discontinuation of RCTs involving patients with chronic pain is concerning. Chronic pain affects many patients; thus, the importance of having quality data from clinical trials cannot be overstated. Our study indicates that chronic pain RCTs are frequently discontinued and their findings often go unpublished - all of which could provide crucial information to providers and patients regarding the treatment of chronic pain. We offer suggestions to enhance chronic pain RCT completion, thereby reducing the waste of resources in chronic pain research.

本横断面分析的主要目的是评估治疗性干预治疗慢性疼痛的随机对照试验(rct)的中止率和未发表率。方法:使用ClinicalTrials.gov网站获取样本,其中包括与慢性疼痛有关的临床试验。分析各试验的发表状态和完成状态。如果在试验注册数据库中没有信息,或者无法通过系统搜索分配信息,则联系相应的试验人员并收集数据点。结果:在我们对408项随机对照试验的最终分析中,我们发现281项(68.9%)发表在同行评议期刊上,127项(31.1%)为未发表的试验。在112项中止试验中,59项(52.7%)发表。此外,296项已完成的试验中有221项(74.7%)发表,75项(25.3%)在试验完成后仍未发表。试验中止最常见的原因是行政建议(71项试验中有41项[57.7%]),而未收到相应试验人员的电子邮件回复是试验未发表最常见的原因(88项试验中有49项[55.7%])。由非行业赞助商资助的临床试验比行业资助的临床试验更有可能发表(未经调整的优势比1.86 [95% CI, 1.18-2.95];校正优势比3.01 [95% CI, 1.76-5.14])。结论:涉及慢性疼痛患者的随机对照试验的中止率令人担忧。慢性疼痛影响许多患者;因此,从临床试验中获得高质量数据的重要性怎么强调都不为过。我们的研究表明,慢性疼痛随机对照试验经常被终止,他们的发现往往没有发表——所有这些都可以为提供者和患者提供关于慢性疼痛治疗的重要信息。我们提出了提高慢性疼痛RCT完成度的建议,从而减少慢性疼痛研究的资源浪费。
{"title":"Discontinuation and nonpublication analysis of chronic pain randomized controlled trials.","authors":"Samuel M Jacobsen,&nbsp;Ty Moore,&nbsp;Alexander Douglas,&nbsp;Drew Lester,&nbsp;Austin L Johnson,&nbsp;Matt Vassar","doi":"10.1097/PR9.0000000000001069","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PR9.0000000000001069","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The primary objective of this cross-sectional analysis is to evaluate rates of discontinuation and nonpublication of Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of therapeutic interventions to treat chronic pain.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using ClinicalTrials.gov, a sample was obtained which included clinical trials pertaining to chronic pain. Trials were analyzed for publication status and completion status of each trial. If information was unavailable on the trial registry database, or could not be allocated through a systematic search, the corresponding trialist was contacted and data points were gathered.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In our final analysis of the 408 RCTs, we found that 281 (68.9%) were published in a peer-reviewed journal and 127 (31.1%) were unpublished trials. Of 112 discontinued trials, 59 (52.7%) reached publication. In addition, 221 of 296 completed trials (74.7%) were published, and 75 (25.3%) remained unpublished after trial completion. The most common listed reason for trial discontinuation was administrative recommendations (41 of 71 trials [57.7%]), while not receiving an email reply to our standardized email from the corresponding trialist was the most common result for trial nonpublication (49 of 88 trials [55.7%]). Clinical trials funded by nonindustry sponsors were more likely to reach publication than industry-funded clinical trials (unadjusted odds ratio 1.86 [95% CI, 1.18-2.95]; adjusted odds ratio 3.01 [95% CI, 1.76-5.14]).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The rate of discontinuation of RCTs involving patients with chronic pain is concerning. Chronic pain affects many patients; thus, the importance of having quality data from clinical trials cannot be overstated. Our study indicates that chronic pain RCTs are frequently discontinued and their findings often go unpublished - all of which could provide crucial information to providers and patients regarding the treatment of chronic pain. We offer suggestions to enhance chronic pain RCT completion, thereby reducing the waste of resources in chronic pain research.</p>","PeriodicalId":52189,"journal":{"name":"Pain Reports","volume":"8 3","pages":"e1069"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10079346/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9640639","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Performance and acceptability of the Stressful Life Events Screening Questionnaire in a chronic pain population: a mixed-methods study. 慢性疼痛人群压力生活事件筛选问卷的表现和可接受性:一项混合方法研究。
IF 4.8 Q2 NEUROSCIENCES Pub Date : 2023-05-01 DOI: 10.1097/PR9.0000000000001072
Lene Therese Bergerud Linnemørken, Helle Stangeland, Silje Endresen Reme, Synne Øien Stensland

Introduction: Pain-related fear, anxiety, and avoidance may play key roles in the chronification of pain and related disability. For practitioners, knowledge about the source or drivers of these fears, including patients' exposure to potentially traumatic events (PTEs) and related posttraumatic stress symptoms, could be particularly helpful in guiding their treatment approach.

Objectives: We aimed to investigate whether the use of a brief screening for PTEs could help inform chronic pain treatment.

Methods: The performance and acceptability of the Stressful Life Events Screening Questionnaire (SLESQ) was assessed among 567 adult patients (59% women, mean age 48.1 years) meeting at a hospital outpatient pain clinic. The sensitivity, specificity, and 20 months temporal stability of the SLESQ, assessing exposure to 14 specific trauma types followed by a 15th item capturing exposure to "other events," were assessed through digital administration and follow-up interviews with 55 participants. The qualitative responses of 158 participants reporting exposure to "other events" were reviewed and assessed based on fulfillment of the A Criterion for traumatic events in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition. The acceptability of the SLESQ was assessed in clinical interviews with 12 participants.

Results: The SLESQ demonstrated acceptable sensitivity (70.0%), high specificity (94.9%), and moderate temporal stability (κ = 0.66, P < 0.001). Participants' qualitative elaborations of "other events" were largely (76.3%) consistent with Criterion A events. The screening was well accepted and welcomed.

Conclusion: The results indicate that the use of a brief screening for potential trauma may be helpful to guide clinical practice in chronic pain settings.

与疼痛相关的恐惧、焦虑和回避可能在疼痛和相关残疾的慢性化中起关键作用。对于从业者来说,了解这些恐惧的来源或驱动因素,包括患者对潜在创伤性事件(pte)的暴露和相关的创伤后应激症状,可能对指导他们的治疗方法特别有帮助。目的:我们的目的是调查使用pte的简短筛查是否有助于告知慢性疼痛的治疗。方法:对某医院疼痛门诊就诊的567例成年患者(女性59%,平均年龄48.1岁)进行应激性生活事件筛查问卷(SLESQ)的评分和可接受性评估。通过数字管理和对55名参与者的随访访谈,评估了SLESQ的敏感性、特异性和20个月的时间稳定性,评估了14种特定创伤类型的暴露,随后是第15项捕捉“其他事件”暴露的项目。根据《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第五版中创伤性事件A标准的实现情况,对158名报告“其他事件”暴露的参与者的定性反应进行了审查和评估。在与12名参与者的临床访谈中评估了SLESQ的可接受性。结果:SLESQ具有可接受的灵敏度(70.0%)、高特异性(94.9%)和中等时间稳定性(κ = 0.66, P < 0.001)。参与者对“其他事件”的定性描述大部分(76.3%)与标准A事件一致。放映得到了很好的接受和欢迎。结论:结果表明,使用简短的筛选潜在的创伤可能有助于指导临床实践的慢性疼痛设置。
{"title":"Performance and acceptability of the Stressful Life Events Screening Questionnaire in a chronic pain population: a mixed-methods study.","authors":"Lene Therese Bergerud Linnemørken,&nbsp;Helle Stangeland,&nbsp;Silje Endresen Reme,&nbsp;Synne Øien Stensland","doi":"10.1097/PR9.0000000000001072","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PR9.0000000000001072","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Pain-related fear, anxiety, and avoidance may play key roles in the chronification of pain and related disability. For practitioners, knowledge about the source or drivers of these fears, including patients' exposure to potentially traumatic events (PTEs) and related posttraumatic stress symptoms, could be particularly helpful in guiding their treatment approach.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We aimed to investigate whether the use of a brief screening for PTEs could help inform chronic pain treatment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The performance and acceptability of the Stressful Life Events Screening Questionnaire (SLESQ) was assessed among 567 adult patients (59% women, mean age 48.1 years) meeting at a hospital outpatient pain clinic. The sensitivity, specificity, and 20 months temporal stability of the SLESQ, assessing exposure to 14 specific trauma types followed by a 15th item capturing exposure to \"other events,\" were assessed through digital administration and follow-up interviews with 55 participants. The qualitative responses of 158 participants reporting exposure to \"other events\" were reviewed and assessed based on fulfillment of the A Criterion for traumatic events in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition. The acceptability of the SLESQ was assessed in clinical interviews with 12 participants.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The SLESQ demonstrated acceptable sensitivity (70.0%), high specificity (94.9%), and moderate temporal stability (κ = 0.66, <i>P</i> < 0.001). Participants' qualitative elaborations of \"other events\" were largely (76.3%) consistent with Criterion A events. The screening was well accepted and welcomed.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results indicate that the use of a brief screening for potential trauma may be helpful to guide clinical practice in chronic pain settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":52189,"journal":{"name":"Pain Reports","volume":"8 3","pages":"e1072"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10129107/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9364304","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Effectiveness of music therapy within community hospitals: an EMMPIRE retrospective study. 社区医院音乐治疗的有效性:EMMPIRE回顾性研究。
IF 4.8 Q2 NEUROSCIENCES Pub Date : 2023-04-13 eCollection Date: 2023-05-01 DOI: 10.1097/PR9.0000000000001074
Samuel N Rodgers-Melnick, Rachael L Rivard, Seneca Block, Jeffery A Dusek

Introduction: Given the challenges health systems face in providing effective nonpharmacologic treatment for pain and psychological distress, clinical effectiveness studies of evidence-based strategies such as music therapy (MT) are needed.

Objectives: This study examined changes in patient-reported outcomes (PROs) after MT and explored variables associated with pain reduction of ≥2 units on a 0 to 10 numeric rating scale (NRS).

Methods: A retrospective review was conducted on initial MT interventions provided to adults receiving community hospital care between January 2017 and July 2020. Sessions were included if participants reported pre-session pain, anxiety, and/or stress scores of ≥4 on the NRS. Data analysis included a bootstrap analysis of single-session changes in PROs and a logistic regression exploring variables associated with pain reduction (ie, ≥2 units vs <2 units).

Results: Patients (n = 1056; mean age: 63.83 years; 76.1% female; 57.1% White; 41.1% Black/African American) reported clinically significant mean reductions in pain (2.04 units), anxiety (2.80 units), and stress (3.48 units). After adjusting for demographic, clinical, and operational characteristics in the model (c-statistic = 0.668), patients receiving an MT session in which pain management was a goal were 4.32 times more likely (95% confidence interval 2.26, 8.66) to report pain reduction of ≥2 units than patients receiving an MT session in which pain management was not a session goal.

Conclusion: This retrospective study supports the clinical effectiveness of MT for symptom management in community hospitals. However, additional research is needed to determine which characteristics of MT interventions and patients influence pain change.

引言:鉴于卫生系统在为疼痛和心理困扰提供有效的非药物治疗方面面临的挑战,需要对音乐疗法等循证策略进行临床有效性研究。目的:本研究检查了MT后患者报告结果(PROs)的变化,并在0至10的数字评定量表(NRS)上探讨了与疼痛减轻≥2个单位相关的变量。方法:对2017年1月至2020年7月期间接受社区医院护理的成年人的初始MT干预进行回顾性审查。如果参与者在NRS上报告会前疼痛、焦虑和/或压力得分≥4,则包括会话。数据分析包括PROs单次会话变化的bootstrap分析和探索与疼痛减轻相关变量的逻辑回归(即≥2个单位与结果:患者(n=1056;平均年龄:63.83岁;76.1%女性;57.1%白人;41.1%黑人/非裔美国人)报告疼痛(2.04个单位)、焦虑(2.80个单位),和应力(3.48个单位)。在对模型中的人口统计学、临床和操作特征进行调整后(c统计量=0.668),接受以疼痛管理为目标的MT治疗的患者报告疼痛减轻≥2个单位的可能性是接受以疼痛控制为非治疗目标的MT疗程的患者的4.32倍(95%置信区间2.26,8.66)。结论:本回顾性研究支持MT在社区医院症状管理中的临床有效性。然而,还需要更多的研究来确定MT干预和患者的哪些特征会影响疼痛变化。
{"title":"Effectiveness of music therapy within community hospitals: an EMMPIRE retrospective study.","authors":"Samuel N Rodgers-Melnick,&nbsp;Rachael L Rivard,&nbsp;Seneca Block,&nbsp;Jeffery A Dusek","doi":"10.1097/PR9.0000000000001074","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PR9.0000000000001074","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Given the challenges health systems face in providing effective nonpharmacologic treatment for pain and psychological distress, clinical effectiveness studies of evidence-based strategies such as music therapy (MT) are needed.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study examined changes in patient-reported outcomes (PROs) after MT and explored variables associated with pain reduction of ≥2 units on a 0 to 10 numeric rating scale (NRS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective review was conducted on initial MT interventions provided to adults receiving community hospital care between January 2017 and July 2020. Sessions were included if participants reported pre-session pain, anxiety, and/or stress scores of ≥4 on the NRS. Data analysis included a bootstrap analysis of single-session changes in PROs and a logistic regression exploring variables associated with pain reduction (ie, ≥2 units vs <2 units).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients (n = 1056; mean age: 63.83 years; 76.1% female; 57.1% White; 41.1% Black/African American) reported clinically significant mean reductions in pain (2.04 units), anxiety (2.80 units), and stress (3.48 units). After adjusting for demographic, clinical, and operational characteristics in the model (c-statistic = 0.668), patients receiving an MT session in which pain management was a goal were 4.32 times more likely (95% confidence interval 2.26, 8.66) to report pain reduction of ≥2 units than patients receiving an MT session in which pain management was not a session goal.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This retrospective study supports the clinical effectiveness of MT for symptom management in community hospitals. However, additional research is needed to determine which characteristics of MT interventions and patients influence pain change.</p>","PeriodicalId":52189,"journal":{"name":"Pain Reports","volume":"8 3","pages":"e1074"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8,"publicationDate":"2023-04-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/e5/01/painreports-8-e1074.PMC10508459.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41161181","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Responders and nonresponders to topical capsaicin display distinct temporal summation of pain profiles. 对局部辣椒素有反应者和无反应者表现出不同的疼痛特征的时间总和。
IF 4.8 Q2 NEUROSCIENCES Pub Date : 2023-04-04 eCollection Date: 2023-05-01 DOI: 10.1097/PR9.0000000000001071
Felyx Wong, Aditi Reddy, Yeanuk Rho, Jan Vollert, Paul H Strutton, Sam W Hughes

Introduction: Topical application of capsaicin can produce an ongoing pain state in healthy participants. However, approximately one-third report no pain response (ie, nonresponders), and the reasons for this are poorly understood.

Objectives: In this study, we investigated temporal summation of pain (TSP) profiles, pain ratings and secondary hyperalgesia responses in responders and nonresponders to 1% topical capsaicin cream.

Methods: Assessments were made at baseline and then during an early (ie, 15 minutes) and late (ie, 45 minutes) time points post-capsaicin in 37 healthy participants.

Results: Participants reporting a visual analogue scale (VAS) rating of >50 were defined as responders (n = 24) and those with <50 VAS rating were defined as nonresponders (n = 13). There was a facilitation of TSP during the transition from an early to the late time point post-capsaicin (P<0.001) and the development of secondary hyperalgesia (P<0.05) in the responder group. Nonresponders showed no changes in TSP or secondary hyperalgesia during the early and late time points. There was an association between baseline TSP scores and the later development of a responder or nonresponder phenotype (r = 0.36; P = 0.03). Receiver operating characteristic analysis revealed that baseline TSP works as a good response predictor at an individual level (area under the curve = 0.75).

Conclusion: These data suggest that responders and nonresponders have different facilitatory pain mechanisms. The assessment of TSP may help to identify participants with stronger endogenous pain facilitation who may be more likely to respond to topical capsaicin.

引言:局部应用辣椒素可以使健康参与者产生持续的疼痛状态。然而,大约三分之一的人报告没有疼痛反应(即无反应),其原因尚不清楚。目的:在这项研究中,我们调查了对1%局部辣椒素乳膏有反应和无反应的患者的疼痛(TSP)特征、疼痛分级和继发性痛觉过敏反应的时间总和。方法:对37名健康参与者进行基线评估,然后在辣椒素治疗后的早期(即15分钟)和晚期(即45分钟)时间点进行评估。结果:报告视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分>50的参与者被定义为有反应者(n=24)和有反应者。结论:这些数据表明有反应者和无反应者具有不同的促进性疼痛机制。TSP的评估可能有助于确定具有更强内源性疼痛促进作用的参与者,他们可能更有可能对局部辣椒素产生反应。
{"title":"Responders and nonresponders to topical capsaicin display distinct temporal summation of pain profiles.","authors":"Felyx Wong,&nbsp;Aditi Reddy,&nbsp;Yeanuk Rho,&nbsp;Jan Vollert,&nbsp;Paul H Strutton,&nbsp;Sam W Hughes","doi":"10.1097/PR9.0000000000001071","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PR9.0000000000001071","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Topical application of capsaicin can produce an ongoing pain state in healthy participants. However, approximately one-third report no pain response (ie, nonresponders), and the reasons for this are poorly understood.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>In this study, we investigated temporal summation of pain (TSP) profiles, pain ratings and secondary hyperalgesia responses in responders and nonresponders to 1% topical capsaicin cream.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Assessments were made at baseline and then during an early (ie, 15 minutes) and late (ie, 45 minutes) time points post-capsaicin in 37 healthy participants.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants reporting a visual analogue scale (VAS) rating of >50 were defined as responders (n = 24) and those with <50 VAS rating were defined as nonresponders (n = 13). There was a facilitation of TSP during the transition from an early to the late time point post-capsaicin (P<0.001) and the development of secondary hyperalgesia (P<0.05) in the responder group. Nonresponders showed no changes in TSP or secondary hyperalgesia during the early and late time points. There was an association between baseline TSP scores and the later development of a responder or nonresponder phenotype (r = 0.36; P = 0.03). Receiver operating characteristic analysis revealed that baseline TSP works as a good response predictor at an individual level (area under the curve = 0.75).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These data suggest that responders and nonresponders have different facilitatory pain mechanisms. The assessment of TSP may help to identify participants with stronger endogenous pain facilitation who may be more likely to respond to topical capsaicin.</p>","PeriodicalId":52189,"journal":{"name":"Pain Reports","volume":"8 3","pages":"e1071"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8,"publicationDate":"2023-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10508395/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41166339","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Real-world data and evidence in pain research: a qualitative systematic review of methods in current practice. 真实世界的数据和证据在疼痛研究:在当前实践方法的定性系统回顾。
IF 4.8 Q2 NEUROSCIENCES Pub Date : 2023-03-01 DOI: 10.1097/PR9.0000000000001057
Jan Vollert, Bethea A Kleykamp, John T Farrar, Ian Gilron, David Hohenschurz-Schmidt, Robert D Kerns, Sean Mackey, John D Markman, Michael P McDermott, Andrew S C Rice, Dennis C Turk, Ajay D Wasan, Robert H Dworkin

The use of routinely collected health data (real-world data, RWD) to generate real-world evidence (RWE) for research purposes is a growing field. Computerized search methods, large electronic databases, and the development of novel statistical methods allow for valid analysis of data outside its primary clinical purpose. Here, we systematically reviewed the methodology used for RWE studies in pain research. We searched 3 databases (PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science) for studies using retrospective data sources comparing multiple groups or treatments. The protocol was registered under the DOI:10.17605/OSF.IO/KGVRM. A total of 65 studies were included. Of those, only 4 compared pharmacological interventions, whereas 49 investigated differences in surgical procedures, with the remaining studying alternative or psychological interventions or epidemiological factors. Most 39 studies reported significant results in their primary comparison, and an additional 12 reported comparable effectiveness. Fifty-eight studies used propensity scores to account for group differences, 38 of them using 1:1 case:control matching. Only 17 of 65 studies provided sensitivity analyses to show robustness of their findings, and only 4 studies provided links to publicly accessible protocols. RWE is a relevant construct that can provide evidence complementary to randomized controlled trials (RCTs), especially in scenarios where RCTs are difficult to conduct. The high proportion of studies reporting significant differences between groups or comparable effectiveness could imply a relevant degree of publication bias. RWD provides a potentially important resource to expand high-quality evidence beyond clinical trials, but rigorous quality standards need to be set to maximize the validity of RWE studies.

使用常规收集的健康数据(真实世界数据,RWD)生成用于研究目的的真实世界证据(RWE)是一个不断发展的领域。计算机化的搜索方法,大型电子数据库,以及新型统计方法的发展,允许对其主要临床目的之外的数据进行有效的分析。在这里,我们系统地回顾了疼痛研究中RWE研究使用的方法。我们检索了3个数据库(PubMed、EMBASE和Web of Science),寻找使用回顾性数据源比较多组或治疗的研究。该协议在DOI:10.17605/OSF.IO/KGVRM下注册。共纳入65项研究。其中,只有4项比较了药物干预,而49项调查了外科手术的差异,其余的研究了替代或心理干预或流行病学因素。大多数39项研究在初步比较中报告了显著的结果,另外12项研究报告了可比较的有效性。58项研究使用倾向分数来解释群体差异,其中38项使用1:1的案例:对照匹配。65项研究中只有17项提供了敏感性分析来证明其研究结果的稳健性,只有4项研究提供了可公开访问的协议链接。RWE是一种相关的结构,可以为随机对照试验(rct)提供补充证据,特别是在rct难以进行的情况下。较高比例的研究报告了组间的显著差异或可比较的有效性,这可能意味着存在一定程度的发表偏倚。RWD为扩大临床试验以外的高质量证据提供了潜在的重要资源,但需要制定严格的质量标准,以最大限度地提高RWE研究的有效性。
{"title":"Real-world data and evidence in pain research: a qualitative systematic review of methods in current practice.","authors":"Jan Vollert,&nbsp;Bethea A Kleykamp,&nbsp;John T Farrar,&nbsp;Ian Gilron,&nbsp;David Hohenschurz-Schmidt,&nbsp;Robert D Kerns,&nbsp;Sean Mackey,&nbsp;John D Markman,&nbsp;Michael P McDermott,&nbsp;Andrew S C Rice,&nbsp;Dennis C Turk,&nbsp;Ajay D Wasan,&nbsp;Robert H Dworkin","doi":"10.1097/PR9.0000000000001057","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PR9.0000000000001057","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The use of routinely collected health data (real-world data, RWD) to generate real-world evidence (RWE) for research purposes is a growing field. Computerized search methods, large electronic databases, and the development of novel statistical methods allow for valid analysis of data outside its primary clinical purpose. Here, we systematically reviewed the methodology used for RWE studies in pain research. We searched 3 databases (PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science) for studies using retrospective data sources comparing multiple groups or treatments. The protocol was registered under the DOI:10.17605/OSF.IO/KGVRM. A total of 65 studies were included. Of those, only 4 compared pharmacological interventions, whereas 49 investigated differences in surgical procedures, with the remaining studying alternative or psychological interventions or epidemiological factors. Most 39 studies reported significant results in their primary comparison, and an additional 12 reported comparable effectiveness. Fifty-eight studies used propensity scores to account for group differences, 38 of them using 1:1 case:control matching. Only 17 of 65 studies provided sensitivity analyses to show robustness of their findings, and only 4 studies provided links to publicly accessible protocols. RWE is a relevant construct that can provide evidence complementary to randomized controlled trials (RCTs), especially in scenarios where RCTs are difficult to conduct. The high proportion of studies reporting significant differences between groups or comparable effectiveness could imply a relevant degree of publication bias. RWD provides a potentially important resource to expand high-quality evidence beyond clinical trials, but rigorous quality standards need to be set to maximize the validity of RWE studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":52189,"journal":{"name":"Pain Reports","volume":"8 2","pages":"e1057"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/2d/2d/painreports-8-e1057.PMC9891449.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10661659","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Epidemiology of neuropathic pain: an analysis of prevalence and associated factors in UK Biobank. 神经病理性疼痛的流行病学:英国生物银行的患病率和相关因素分析。
IF 3.4 Q2 NEUROSCIENCES Pub Date : 2023-03-01 DOI: 10.1097/PR9.0000000000001066
Georgios Baskozos, Harry L Hébert, Mathilde Mv Pascal, Andreas C Themistocleous, Gary J Macfarlane, David Wynick, David Lh Bennett, Blair H Smith
{"title":"Epidemiology of neuropathic pain: an analysis of prevalence and associated factors in UK Biobank.","authors":"Georgios Baskozos, Harry L Hébert, Mathilde Mv Pascal, Andreas C Themistocleous, Gary J Macfarlane, David Wynick, David Lh Bennett, Blair H Smith","doi":"10.1097/PR9.0000000000001066","DOIUrl":"10.1097/PR9.0000000000001066","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":52189,"journal":{"name":"Pain Reports","volume":"8 2","pages":"e1066"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7614463/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9916769","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Pain Reports
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1