CONTINUUM Lifelong Learning in Neurology最新文献

Objective: This article reviews the clinical features, MRI characteristics, diagnosis, and treatment of aquaporin-4 antibody-positive neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (AQP4-NMOSD) and myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibody-associated disease (MOGAD). The main differences between these disorders and multiple sclerosis (MS), the most common demyelinating disease of the central nervous system (CNS), are also highlighted.

Latest developments: The past 20 years have seen important advances in understanding rare demyelinating CNS disorders associated with AQP4 IgG and myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein (MOG) IgG. The rapidly expanding repertoire of immunosuppressive agents approved for the treatment of AQP4-NMOSD and emerging as potentially beneficial in MOGAD mandates prompt recognition of these diseases. Most of the recent literature has focused on the identification of clinical and MRI features that help distinguish these diseases from each other and MS, simultaneously highlighting major diagnostic pitfalls that may lead to misdiagnosis. An awareness of the limitations of currently available assays for AQP4 IgG and MOG IgG detection is fundamental for identifying rare false antibody positivity and avoiding inappropriate treatments. For this purpose, diagnostic criteria have been created to help the clinician interpret antibody testing results and recognize the clinical and MRI phenotypes associated with AQP4-NMOSD and MOGAD.

Essential points: An awareness of the specific clinical and MRI features associated with AQP4-NMOSD and MOGAD and the limitations of currently available antibody testing assays is crucial for a correct diagnosis and differentiation from MS. The growing availability of effective treatment options will lead to personalized therapies and improved outcomes.

Objective: This article focuses on the clinical features and diagnostic evaluations that accurately identify patients with ever-expanding forms of antibody-defined encephalitis. Forms of autoimmune encephalitis are more prevalent than infectious encephalitis and represent treatable neurologic syndromes for which early immunotherapies lead to the best outcomes.

Latest developments: A clinically driven approach to identifying many autoimmune encephalitis syndromes is feasible, given the typically distinctive features associated with each antibody. Patient demographics alongside the presence and nature of seizures, cognitive impairment, psychiatric disturbances, movement disorders, and peripheral features provide a valuable set of clinical tools to guide the detection and interpretation of highly specific antibodies. In turn, these clinical features in combination with serologic findings and selective paraclinical testing, direct the rationale for the administration of immunotherapies. Observational studies provide the mainstay of evidence guiding first- and second-line immunotherapy administration in autoimmune encephalitis and, whereas these typically result in some clinical improvements, almost all patients have residual neuropsychiatric deficits, and many experience clinical relapses. An improved pathophysiologic understanding and ongoing clinical trials can help to address these unmet medical needs.

Essential points: Antibodies against central nervous system proteins characterize various autoimmune encephalitis syndromes. The most common targets include leucine-rich glioma inactivated protein 1 (LGI1), N-methyl-d-aspartate (NMDA) receptors, contactin-associated proteinlike 2 (CASPR2), and glutamic acid decarboxylase 65 (GAD65). Each antibody-associated autoimmune encephalitis typically presents with a recognizable blend of clinical and investigation features, which help differentiate each from alternative diagnoses. The rapid expansion of recognized antibodies and some clinical overlaps support panel-based antibody testing. The clinical-serologic picture guides the immunotherapy regime and offers valuable prognostic information. Patient care should be delivered in conjunction with autoimmune encephalitis experts.

Objective: This article reviews autoimmune neuromuscular disorders and includes an overview of the diagnostic approach, especially the role of antibody testing in a variety of neuropathies and some other neuromuscular disorders.

Latest developments: In the past few decades, multiple antibody biomarkers associated with immune-mediated neuromuscular disorders have been reported. These biomarkers are not only useful for better understanding of disease pathogenesis and allowing more timely diagnosis but may also aid in the selection of an optimal treatment strategy.

Essential points: Recognition of autoimmune neuromuscular conditions encountered in inpatient or outpatient neurologic practice is very important because many of these disorders are reversible with prompt diagnosis and early treatment. Antibodies are often helpful in making this diagnosis. However, the clinical phenotype and electrodiagnostic testing should be taken into account when ordering antibody tests or panels and interpreting the subsequent results. Similar to other laboratory investigations, understanding the potential utility and limitations of antibody testing in each clinical setting is critical for practicing neurologists.

Objective: This article reviews the clinical and antibody spectrum of autoimmune cerebellar ataxia and other autoimmune movement disorders. It highlights characteristic phenotypes and red flags to the diagnosis and how these rare, but treatable, disorders are integrated into a differential diagnosis.

Latest developments: An increasing number of neuronal antibodies have been identified in patients with cerebellar ataxia, for example, against Kelch-like protein 11 (KLHL11), seizure-related 6 homolog-like 2, septin-3 and septin-5, or tripartite motif containing protein 9 (TRIM9), TRIM46, and TRIM67. Ig-like cell adhesion molecule 5 (IgLON5) antibody-associated syndromes have emerged as an important alternative diagnostic consideration to various neurodegenerative diseases such as Huntington disease or atypical parkinsonism. Opsoclonus-myoclonus syndrome emerged as the most relevant parainfectious movement disorder related to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2).

Essential points: Autoimmune cerebellar ataxia and other autoimmune movement disorders encompass a broad spectrum of different clinical syndromes, antibodies, and immunopathophysiologic mechanisms. Clinical acumen is key to identifying the cases that should undergo testing for neuronal antibodies. Given the overlap between phenotypes and antibodies, panel testing in serum and CSF is recommended.

Abstract: As newer, innovative neurology drugs enter the US health care system, neurologists should consider the cost of these treatments in addition to their efficacy, safety, and tolerability. To do so thoughtfully requires an understanding of how prescription drugs are priced in the United States. The process of drug pricing is linked to the distribution supply chain and the many stakeholders involved. Stakeholders include pharmaceutical manufacturers; wholesalers; pharmacies; pharmacy benefit managers; payers, including health insurers; hospital systems; neurologists and other clinicians; and patients. Drug pricing has taken center stage as the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 has set maximum out-of-pocket expenses for Medicare beneficiaries for the first time in the program's history and limits drug price increases for a select group of Medicare Part D drugs. This article describes the US drug distribution supply chain and its stakeholders and introduces key drug pricing terms; a brief description of how rebates are generally estimated will also be discussed. Finally, as newer neurology outpatient drugs enter the market, the "value" of drugs will be described through cost-effectiveness terminology and their utility for the clinical neurologist.

Objective: This article provides an overview of the neurologic manifestations of sarcoidosis and select rheumatologic disorders. An approach to the assessment and differential diagnosis of characteristic clinical presentations, including meningitis and vasculitis, is also reviewed. A review of treatment options is included as well as discussion of distinct areas of overlap, including rheumatologic disease in the setting of neuromyelitis spectrum disorder and demyelinating disease in the setting of tumor necrosis factor-α inhibitors.

Latest developments: An increased understanding of the immune mechanisms involved in sarcoidosis and rheumatologic diseases has resulted in a greater diversity of therapeutic options for their treatment. Evidence directing the treatment of the central nervous system (CNS) manifestations of these same diseases is lacking, with a paucity of controlled trials.

Essential points: It is important to have a basic knowledge of the common CNS manifestations of rheumatologic diseases and sarcoidosis so that they can be recognized when encountered. In the context of many systemic inflammatory diseases, including systemic lupus erythematosus, IgG4-related disease, and sarcoidosis, CNS disease may be a presenting feature or occur without systemic manifestations of the disease, making familiarity with these diseases even more important.