Pub Date : 2021-01-01DOI: 10.25041/constitutionale.v2i1.2253
Dragoș Călin
The Romanian Superior Council of Magistracy (RSCM) has failed to provide stability as an active form of involvement to defend the judicial officers against acts that injures their independenc, impartiality, and professional reputation. The disrespect towards the juidical officers through the media have not motivated the RSM to take any actions. This is not aligned with their responsibility to clarify any miss-leading information. The RSCM has yet to overcome the flawed integrity of the judiciary system.
{"title":"The Romanian Superior Council of Magistracy’s Role in the Protection of The Law Enforcement","authors":"Dragoș Călin","doi":"10.25041/constitutionale.v2i1.2253","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.25041/constitutionale.v2i1.2253","url":null,"abstract":"The Romanian Superior Council of Magistracy (RSCM) has failed to provide stability as an active form of involvement to defend the judicial officers against acts that injures their independenc, impartiality, and professional reputation. The disrespect towards the juidical officers through the media have not motivated the RSM to take any actions. This is not aligned with their responsibility to clarify any miss-leading information. The RSCM has yet to overcome the flawed integrity of the judiciary system.","PeriodicalId":52591,"journal":{"name":"Constitutionale","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"69162823","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2021-01-01DOI: 10.25041/constitutionale.v2i1.2255
Wilma Silalahi
The crime of terrorism is an extraordinary crime against humanity, including a “serious crime” whose number of actions has increased. It requires handling with exceptional measures and "serious measures" with still respecting human values. Thus, what becomes an interesting problem in this research is how to involve the Indonesian National Army in handling acts of terrorism from a legal perspective. This research uses a normative doctrinal method. The Indonesian National Army's involvement in managing acts of terrorism and supported by the prevailing laws and regulations provides a greater sense of security and legal certainty for the community. Also, this research intends to examine that the involvement of the Indonesian National Army in handling acts of terrorism is by applicable regulations. The handling of criminal acts of terrorism requires a juridical basis to create a sense of security and justice. Thus, the Indonesian National Army must maintain the Unitary State of the Republic of Indonesia's territorial integrity and uphold state sovereignty. Therefore, the involvement of the Indonesian National Army in the context of handling acts of terrorism is an aid to the PolicePolice in defending the independence of the state, maintaining the territorial integrity of the Unitary State of the Republic of Indonesia, and protecting the entire nation and all spilled Indonesian blood based on Pancasila and the 1945 Constitution. The involvement of the Indonesian National Army in eradicating acts of terrorism is part of the support for the National Police, in the context of carrying out law enforcement operations that are not Military Operations Apart from War, unless they develop into acts of terrorism that threaten the existence of the Unitary State of the Republic of Indonesia or extraordinary circumstances occurs. This is in line with the Indonesian National Army's unique nature (lex specialis) in carrying out its duties.
{"title":"Indonesian National Army Involvement in Handling Terrorism Action from Legal Perspective","authors":"Wilma Silalahi","doi":"10.25041/constitutionale.v2i1.2255","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.25041/constitutionale.v2i1.2255","url":null,"abstract":"The crime of terrorism is an extraordinary crime against humanity, including a “serious crime” whose number of actions has increased. It requires handling with exceptional measures and \"serious measures\" with still respecting human values. Thus, what becomes an interesting problem in this research is how to involve the Indonesian National Army in handling acts of terrorism from a legal perspective. This research uses a normative doctrinal method. The Indonesian National Army's involvement in managing acts of terrorism and supported by the prevailing laws and regulations provides a greater sense of security and legal certainty for the community. Also, this research intends to examine that the involvement of the Indonesian National Army in handling acts of terrorism is by applicable regulations. The handling of criminal acts of terrorism requires a juridical basis to create a sense of security and justice. Thus, the Indonesian National Army must maintain the Unitary State of the Republic of Indonesia's territorial integrity and uphold state sovereignty. Therefore, the involvement of the Indonesian National Army in the context of handling acts of terrorism is an aid to the PolicePolice in defending the independence of the state, maintaining the territorial integrity of the Unitary State of the Republic of Indonesia, and protecting the entire nation and all spilled Indonesian blood based on Pancasila and the 1945 Constitution. The involvement of the Indonesian National Army in eradicating acts of terrorism is part of the support for the National Police, in the context of carrying out law enforcement operations that are not Military Operations Apart from War, unless they develop into acts of terrorism that threaten the existence of the Unitary State of the Republic of Indonesia or extraordinary circumstances occurs. This is in line with the Indonesian National Army's unique nature (lex specialis) in carrying out its duties.","PeriodicalId":52591,"journal":{"name":"Constitutionale","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"69162882","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2020-12-27DOI: 10.25041/constitutionale.v1i2.2118
Ricky Tongam Marpahala Siahaan, C. Perbawati, A. Saleh
Protection of human rights is a responsibility that must be carried out by the state, in this case the state must also resolve cases of human rights violations that have occurred. There are many cases of human rights violations that occurred in the past but cannot be resolved because there are no legal rules that govern at that time. The presence of Law Number 26 of 2000 concerning the court of human rightss is certainly a way for the government to resolve the problem of gross human rights violations in the past. The principle of retroactivity was included in Law Number 26 of 2000 concerning the court of human rightss so that gross violations of human rights that occurred in the past could be resolved. The retroactive principle in Law Number 26 of 2000 concerning the court of human rightss is considered to violate existing regulations in Indonesia, especially it is considered contrary to the 1945 Constitution. -Law Number 26 of 2000 concerning the court of human rightss. This research uses normative research methods. The data used are secondary data in the form of primary legal materials, secondary legal materials, and tertiary legal materials. The results of this study indicate that the application of the retroactive principle in Law Number 26 of 2000 concerning the court of human rightss does not contain elements that are absolutely contradictory to the Law. 1945 foundation.
{"title":"The Retroactive Principle in Law No. 26 of 2000 concerning the court of human rights","authors":"Ricky Tongam Marpahala Siahaan, C. Perbawati, A. Saleh","doi":"10.25041/constitutionale.v1i2.2118","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.25041/constitutionale.v1i2.2118","url":null,"abstract":"Protection of human rights is a responsibility that must be carried out by the state, in this case the state must also resolve cases of human rights violations that have occurred. There are many cases of human rights violations that occurred in the past but cannot be resolved because there are no legal rules that govern at that time. The presence of Law Number 26 of 2000 concerning the court of human rightss is certainly a way for the government to resolve the problem of gross human rights violations in the past. The principle of retroactivity was included in Law Number 26 of 2000 concerning the court of human rightss so that gross violations of human rights that occurred in the past could be resolved. The retroactive principle in Law Number 26 of 2000 concerning the court of human rightss is considered to violate existing regulations in Indonesia, especially it is considered contrary to the 1945 Constitution. -Law Number 26 of 2000 concerning the court of human rightss. This research uses normative research methods. The data used are secondary data in the form of primary legal materials, secondary legal materials, and tertiary legal materials. The results of this study indicate that the application of the retroactive principle in Law Number 26 of 2000 concerning the court of human rightss does not contain elements that are absolutely contradictory to the Law. 1945 foundation.","PeriodicalId":52591,"journal":{"name":"Constitutionale","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-12-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"45775576","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2020-12-27DOI: 10.25041/constitutionale.v1i2.2119
I. Qurbani, M. L. Hakim, Tunggul Anshari S.N
The existence of customary institutions in the village is important because it has a duty to assist the Village Government and as partners in empowering, preserving and developing customs. The Village Customary Institution can occupy its rank with official recognition from the Government through a Village Regulation. Ngadisari Village was chosen as the object of this research because it has its own uniqueness, this village has indigenous people who are still strong in maintaining the traditions of their ancestors' heritage. Meanwhile, Ngadisari village also has a customary institution that carries out customary functions and is part of the original village structure that grows and develops on the initiative of the village community. The research method used is a type of empirical research and using sociological approach. The order of village regulations regarding customary institutions in order to make Adat Institutions as an alternative to dispute resolution, maintain local culture and play a role in village development. In addition, this formalization effort is also needed to maintain the existence of customary villages, provide legal protection and help cooperation between traditional village institutions of Ngadisari and other village customary institutions. This is in accordance with the duties of the customary institutions in Permendagri Number 18 of 2018 concerning Village Community Institutions and Village Traditional Institutions.
{"title":"The Urgency Of The Formation Of Village Regulations Concerning Customary Institutions In Creating Legal Protection For The Adat Community Of Ngadisari Village Sukapura Sub-District Probolinggo District","authors":"I. Qurbani, M. L. Hakim, Tunggul Anshari S.N","doi":"10.25041/constitutionale.v1i2.2119","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.25041/constitutionale.v1i2.2119","url":null,"abstract":"The existence of customary institutions in the village is important because it has a duty to assist the Village Government and as partners in empowering, preserving and developing customs. The Village Customary Institution can occupy its rank with official recognition from the Government through a Village Regulation. Ngadisari Village was chosen as the object of this research because it has its own uniqueness, this village has indigenous people who are still strong in maintaining the traditions of their ancestors' heritage. Meanwhile, Ngadisari village also has a customary institution that carries out customary functions and is part of the original village structure that grows and develops on the initiative of the village community. The research method used is a type of empirical research and using sociological approach. The order of village regulations regarding customary institutions in order to make Adat Institutions as an alternative to dispute resolution, maintain local culture and play a role in village development. In addition, this formalization effort is also needed to maintain the existence of customary villages, provide legal protection and help cooperation between traditional village institutions of Ngadisari and other village customary institutions. This is in accordance with the duties of the customary institutions in Permendagri Number 18 of 2018 concerning Village Community Institutions and Village Traditional Institutions.","PeriodicalId":52591,"journal":{"name":"Constitutionale","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-12-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"42538533","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2020-12-27DOI: 10.25041/constitutionale.v1i2.2137
Ganiviantara Pratama
The main problem of this research is that there is no firmness regarding the diction of individual words in the Constitution which is useful as a condition for nominating Regional Representative Council or Dewan Perwakilan Daerah (DPD) membership. This indecisiveness has led to the composition of DPD membership being dominated by members of political parties. This journal aims to explore the meaning of the diction of words contained in the 1945 NRI Constitution, namely "Individual" which is clearly written in Article 22E paragraph (4) of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia after the Constitutional Court Decision No30/PUU-XVI/2018. The meaning of the term “individual” in this article will determine the conditions for nominating members of the DPD so that they are more in line with the objectives of establishing the institution. This journal uses a statutory approach and a historical approach. The results of this discussion show that the original intense definition concluded by the author regarding the word "individual" in the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia after the Constitutional Court Decision has the following meaning: an individual who does not have a political party background or political party management and really understands his / her region.
{"title":"Original Intents: Individual Requirements for Candidates of Regional Representative Council","authors":"Ganiviantara Pratama","doi":"10.25041/constitutionale.v1i2.2137","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.25041/constitutionale.v1i2.2137","url":null,"abstract":"The main problem of this research is that there is no firmness regarding the diction of individual words in the Constitution which is useful as a condition for nominating Regional Representative Council or Dewan Perwakilan Daerah (DPD) membership. This indecisiveness has led to the composition of DPD membership being dominated by members of political parties. This journal aims to explore the meaning of the diction of words contained in the 1945 NRI Constitution, namely \"Individual\" which is clearly written in Article 22E paragraph (4) of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia after the Constitutional Court Decision No30/PUU-XVI/2018. The meaning of the term “individual” in this article will determine the conditions for nominating members of the DPD so that they are more in line with the objectives of establishing the institution. This journal uses a statutory approach and a historical approach. The results of this discussion show that the original intense definition concluded by the author regarding the word \"individual\" in the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia after the Constitutional Court Decision has the following meaning: an individual who does not have a political party background or political party management and really understands his / her region.","PeriodicalId":52591,"journal":{"name":"Constitutionale","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-12-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"47844823","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2020-12-27DOI: 10.25041/constitutionale.v1i2.2173
Nowinri Hilgutshiany Marini Pratiwi Pitanuki
The background that underlies the conduct of this legal research is the existence of a conflict of norms, namely in the Fiduciary Guarantee Act, direct execution can be carried out if the debtor has committed an injury (also called default), but in the Constitutional Court ruling Number: 18 / PUU-XVII / 2019 This is done immediately after the debtor is injured but requires a statement of voluntary interest from the debtor or through a judicial decision. The problem in this research is related to the essence of the execution of fiduciary guarantees, the development of the fiduciary guarantee execution arrangements before and after the Constitutional Court decision Number: 18 / PUU-XVII / 2019 the implications of the Constitutional Court decision Number: 18 / PUU-XVII / 2019 on the principles of simple, fast, and low cost. The type of research used in this research is juridical normative, using a statutory approach and a case approach, as well as primary and secondary legal materials which are analyzed by grammatical and systematic interpretation. The results of this study indicate that the essence of the execution of fiduciary guarantees is to sell fiduciary collateral as repayment of debtor's unfulfilled obligations. The creditor has the right to collect the debtor's achievements including to collect all instalments and other fees that have not been paid by the debtor, and has the right to execute the object that is used as collateral without having to return the excess price from the sale of the object. The execution of the fiduciary guarantee prior to the enactment of the Constitutional Court Decision Number 18 / PUU-XVII / 2019 is based on the Fiduciary Guarantee Certificate which contains the words "FOR JUSTICE BASED ON ONE ALMIGHTY GOD". These words indicate that the fiduciary guarantee certificate has executorial power, that is, it has the same power as a court decision which has permanent legal force. The legal implication of the enactment of the Constitutional Court Decision Number 18 / PUU-XVII / 2019 is that a trial must first be held regarding the execution of fiduciary guarantees as a condition for the execution of fiduciary.
{"title":"Executions of Fiduciaryry Guarantee Post Constitutional Court Decision No. Nomor: 18/Puu-Xvii/2019","authors":"Nowinri Hilgutshiany Marini Pratiwi Pitanuki","doi":"10.25041/constitutionale.v1i2.2173","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.25041/constitutionale.v1i2.2173","url":null,"abstract":"The background that underlies the conduct of this legal research is the existence of a conflict of norms, namely in the Fiduciary Guarantee Act, direct execution can be carried out if the debtor has committed an injury (also called default), but in the Constitutional Court ruling Number: 18 / PUU-XVII / 2019 This is done immediately after the debtor is injured but requires a statement of voluntary interest from the debtor or through a judicial decision. The problem in this research is related to the essence of the execution of fiduciary guarantees, the development of the fiduciary guarantee execution arrangements before and after the Constitutional Court decision Number: 18 / PUU-XVII / 2019 the implications of the Constitutional Court decision Number: 18 / PUU-XVII / 2019 on the principles of simple, fast, and low cost. The type of research used in this research is juridical normative, using a statutory approach and a case approach, as well as primary and secondary legal materials which are analyzed by grammatical and systematic interpretation. The results of this study indicate that the essence of the execution of fiduciary guarantees is to sell fiduciary collateral as repayment of debtor's unfulfilled obligations. The creditor has the right to collect the debtor's achievements including to collect all instalments and other fees that have not been paid by the debtor, and has the right to execute the object that is used as collateral without having to return the excess price from the sale of the object. The execution of the fiduciary guarantee prior to the enactment of the Constitutional Court Decision Number 18 / PUU-XVII / 2019 is based on the Fiduciary Guarantee Certificate which contains the words \"FOR JUSTICE BASED ON ONE ALMIGHTY GOD\". These words indicate that the fiduciary guarantee certificate has executorial power, that is, it has the same power as a court decision which has permanent legal force. The legal implication of the enactment of the Constitutional Court Decision Number 18 / PUU-XVII / 2019 is that a trial must first be held regarding the execution of fiduciary guarantees as a condition for the execution of fiduciary.","PeriodicalId":52591,"journal":{"name":"Constitutionale","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-12-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"45952576","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2020-12-27DOI: 10.25041/constitutionale.v1i2.2125
Neysa Tania, Rio Kurniawan
Digitalization is a global phenomenon that has an impact on changing social conditions. The Broadcasting Bill itself is canceled to be a priority in the 2020 Priority National Legislation Program even though there is a lot of material contained in the law itself needs to be updated immediately according to the times. Therefore, the function of conducting this research is to seek answers in terms of legal certainty regarding the development of legal relations with technological developments in the era of digitalization and constitutional interpretation in the digitalization era that supports sustainable economic development and is in accordance with the Indonesian national identity. This study uses a quantitative juridical analysis method, which is in the form of in-depth research on legal materials and data as usual as normative law. Furthermore, the results of the analysis will be linked to the problems in this study to produce an objective assessment to answer the problems in the research. The results of the research show that the OTT services cannot be in the scope of Law Number 32 of 2002 concerning Broadcasting, therefore the Constitutional Court must play a strategic role in carrying out rapid and precise reforms so that statutory norms can be consistent with the development of society, especially due to developments. Digital technology. The most ideal and relevant constitutional interpretation of the Judicial Review case against this law would be: Consensualism, Prudential and Futuristic with an emphasis on legal certainty for Over the Top (OTT) services and on socio-economic impacts significant impact on the general welfare. It is necessary to revise the Broadcasting Law with the intention of maintaining national integration to establish a national broadcasting system that guarantees the creation of a just, equitable, and balanced national information order in order to realize social justice for all Indonesian people.
数字化是一种全球现象，对不断变化的社会状况产生了影响。虽然《广播法》本身有很多内容需要及时更新，但为了成为2020年优先立法课题而被取消。因此，进行这项研究的功能是在法律确定性方面寻求答案，关于法律关系的发展与数字化时代的技术发展和宪法解释在数字化时代，支持可持续的经济发展，并符合印尼的民族认同。本研究采用定量的法律分析方法，与规范法一样，对法律资料和数据进行深入研究。此外，分析的结果将与本研究中的问题联系起来，以产生客观的评估来回答研究中的问题。研究结果表明，OTT服务不可能在2002年关于广播的第32号法律的范围内，因此宪法法院必须在进行快速和精确的改革方面发挥战略作用，以便法定规范能够与社会的发展保持一致，特别是由于发展。数字技术。对反对这项法律的司法审查案件的最理想和相关的宪法解释将是:共识主义、审慎主义和未来主义，强调Over The Top (OTT)服务的法律确定性，以及对社会经济影响对一般福利的重大影响。有必要修订《广播法》，以便维持国家一体化，建立一个国家广播系统，保证建立一个公正、公平和平衡的国家新闻秩序，以便为所有印度尼西亚人民实现社会正义。
{"title":"The Urgency of Amendment to Law Number 32 of 2002 concerning Broadcasting as the Legal Umbrella for OTT Services","authors":"Neysa Tania, Rio Kurniawan","doi":"10.25041/constitutionale.v1i2.2125","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.25041/constitutionale.v1i2.2125","url":null,"abstract":"Digitalization is a global phenomenon that has an impact on changing social conditions. The Broadcasting Bill itself is canceled to be a priority in the 2020 Priority National Legislation Program even though there is a lot of material contained in the law itself needs to be updated immediately according to the times. Therefore, the function of conducting this research is to seek answers in terms of legal certainty regarding the development of legal relations with technological developments in the era of digitalization and constitutional interpretation in the digitalization era that supports sustainable economic development and is in accordance with the Indonesian national identity. This study uses a quantitative juridical analysis method, which is in the form of in-depth research on legal materials and data as usual as normative law. Furthermore, the results of the analysis will be linked to the problems in this study to produce an objective assessment to answer the problems in the research. The results of the research show that the OTT services cannot be in the scope of Law Number 32 of 2002 concerning Broadcasting, therefore the Constitutional Court must play a strategic role in carrying out rapid and precise reforms so that statutory norms can be consistent with the development of society, especially due to developments. Digital technology. The most ideal and relevant constitutional interpretation of the Judicial Review case against this law would be: Consensualism, Prudential and Futuristic with an emphasis on legal certainty for Over the Top (OTT) services and on socio-economic impacts significant impact on the general welfare. It is necessary to revise the Broadcasting Law with the intention of maintaining national integration to establish a national broadcasting system that guarantees the creation of a just, equitable, and balanced national information order in order to realize social justice for all Indonesian people.","PeriodicalId":52591,"journal":{"name":"Constitutionale","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-12-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"42704100","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：