首页 > 最新文献

Alzheimer''s and Dementia: Translational Research and Clinical Interventions最新文献

英文 中文
Relationships between plasma biomarkers, tau PET, FDG PET, and volumetric MRI in mild to moderate Alzheimer's disease patients 轻度至中度阿尔茨海默病患者血浆生物标志物、tau PET、FDG PET 和容积 MRI 之间的关系。
IF 4.9 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Pub Date : 2024-07-09 DOI: 10.1002/trc2.12490
Dawn C. Matthews, Jefferson W. Kinney, Aaron Ritter, Randolph D. Andrews, Erin N. Toledano Strom, Ana S. Lukic, Lauren N. Koenig, Carolyn Revta, Howard M. Fillit, Kate Zhong, Babak Tousi, James B. Leverenz, Howard H. Feldman, Jeffrey Cummings
<div> <section> <h3> INTRODUCTION</h3> <p>The “A/T/N” (amyloid/tau/neurodegeneration) framework provides a biological basis for Alzheimer's disease (AD) diagnosis and can encompass additional changes such as inflammation (“I”). A spectrum of T/N/I imaging and plasma biomarkers was acquired in a phase 2 clinical trial of rasagiline in mild to moderate AD patients. We evaluated these to understand biomarker distributions and relationships within this population.</p> </section> <section> <h3> METHODS</h3> <p>Plasma biomarkers of pTau-181, neurofilament light chain (NfL), glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), other inflammation-related proteins, imaging measures including fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET), flortaucipir PET, and volumetric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and cognitive endpoints were analyzed to assess characteristics and relationships for the overall population (<i>N</i> = 47 at baseline and <i>N</i> = 21 for longitudinal cognitive comparisons) and within age-decade subgroups (57-69, 70-79, 80-90 years).</p> </section> <section> <h3> RESULTS</h3> <p>Data demonstrate wide clinical and biomarker heterogeneity in this population influenced by age and sex. Plasma pTau-181 and GFAP correlate with tau PET, most strongly in left inferior temporal cortex (<i>p</i> = 0.0002, <i>p</i> = 0.0006, respectively). In regions beyond temporal cortex, tau PET uptake decreased with age for the same pTau-181 or GFAP concentrations. FDG PET and brain volumes correlate with tau PET in numerous regions (such as inferior temporal: <i>p</i> = 0.0007, <i>p</i> = 0.00001, respectively). NfL, GFAP, and all imaging modalities correlate with baseline MMSE; subsequent MMSE decline is predicted by baseline parahippocampal and lateral temporal tau PET (<i>p</i> = 0.0007) and volume (<i>p</i> = 0.0006). Lateral temporal FDG PET (<i>p</i> = 0.006) and volume (<i>p</i> = 0.0001) are most strongly associated with subsequent ADAS-cog decline. NfL correlates with FDG PET and baseline MMSE but not tau PET. Inflammation biomarkers are intercorrelated but correlated with other biomarkers in only the youngest group.</p> </section> <section> <h3> DISCUSSION</h3> <p>Associations between plasma biomarkers, imaging biomarkers, and cognitive status observed in this study provide insight into relationships among biological processes in mild to moderate AD. Findings show the potential to characterize AD patients regarding likely tau pathology, neurodegeneration, prospective clinical decline, and the importance of covariates such as age.</p>
导言:A/T/N"(淀粉样蛋白/tau/神经变性)框架为阿尔茨海默病(AD)的诊断提供了生物学基础,并可包括炎症("I")等其他变化。在一项针对轻度至中度阿尔茨海默病患者的拉沙吉林 2 期临床试验中,我们获得了一系列 T/N/I 成像和血浆生物标记物。我们对这些指标进行了评估,以了解这一人群中生物标志物的分布和关系:血浆中的 pTau-181、神经丝蛋白轻链(NfL)、神经胶质纤维酸性蛋白(GFAP)、其他炎症相关蛋白等生物标记物,以及包括氟脱氧葡萄糖(FDG)正电子发射断层扫描(PET)、氟噻嘧啶正电子发射断层扫描(PET)和容积磁共振在内的成像测量、和容积磁共振成像(MRI)以及认知终点进行了分析,以评估总体人群(基线时为 47 人,纵向认知比较时为 21 人)和年龄十年亚组(57-69 岁、70-79 岁、80-90 岁)的特征和关系。结果数据显示,受年龄和性别影响,该人群的临床和生物标志物具有广泛的异质性。血浆 pTau-181 和 GFAP 与 tau PET 相关性最强的是左下颞皮质(分别为 p = 0.0002 和 p = 0.0006)。在颞皮层以外的区域,pTau-181或GFAP浓度相同时,tau PET摄取量随年龄增长而降低。在许多区域,FDG PET 和脑容量与 tau PET 相关(如颞下部:分别为 p = 0.0007 和 p = 0.00001)。NfL、GFAP和所有成像模式都与基线MMSE相关;基线海马旁和颞外侧tau PET(p = 0.0007)和体积(p = 0.0006)可预测随后的MMSE下降。外侧颞叶 FDG PET(p = 0.006)和体积(p = 0.0001)与随后的 ADAS-cog 下降关系最为密切。NfL与FDG PET和基线MMSE相关,但与tau PET无关。炎症生物标志物相互关联,但只有最年轻的一组与其他生物标志物相关:讨论:本研究中观察到的血浆生物标志物、成像生物标志物和认知状态之间的关联,有助于深入了解轻度至中度AD的生物过程之间的关系。研究结果表明,在可能的tau病理学、神经退行性变、前瞻性临床衰退以及年龄等协变因素的重要性方面,有可能对AD患者进行特征描述:NfL与FDG PET和认知终点相关,但与血浆pTau-181或tau PET无关.体积和FDG PET与tau PET、相互之间以及认知状态都有密切关系.颞叶体积对MMSE和ADAS-cog的衰退有最强烈的预测作用.体积和血浆生物标志物可以丰富tau PET的升高,而年龄则是一个重要的协变量.
{"title":"Relationships between plasma biomarkers, tau PET, FDG PET, and volumetric MRI in mild to moderate Alzheimer's disease patients","authors":"Dawn C. Matthews,&nbsp;Jefferson W. Kinney,&nbsp;Aaron Ritter,&nbsp;Randolph D. Andrews,&nbsp;Erin N. Toledano Strom,&nbsp;Ana S. Lukic,&nbsp;Lauren N. Koenig,&nbsp;Carolyn Revta,&nbsp;Howard M. Fillit,&nbsp;Kate Zhong,&nbsp;Babak Tousi,&nbsp;James B. Leverenz,&nbsp;Howard H. Feldman,&nbsp;Jeffrey Cummings","doi":"10.1002/trc2.12490","DOIUrl":"10.1002/trc2.12490","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;div&gt;\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 &lt;section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;h3&gt; INTRODUCTION&lt;/h3&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;p&gt;The “A/T/N” (amyloid/tau/neurodegeneration) framework provides a biological basis for Alzheimer's disease (AD) diagnosis and can encompass additional changes such as inflammation (“I”). A spectrum of T/N/I imaging and plasma biomarkers was acquired in a phase 2 clinical trial of rasagiline in mild to moderate AD patients. We evaluated these to understand biomarker distributions and relationships within this population.&lt;/p&gt;\u0000 &lt;/section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;h3&gt; METHODS&lt;/h3&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;p&gt;Plasma biomarkers of pTau-181, neurofilament light chain (NfL), glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), other inflammation-related proteins, imaging measures including fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET), flortaucipir PET, and volumetric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and cognitive endpoints were analyzed to assess characteristics and relationships for the overall population (&lt;i&gt;N&lt;/i&gt; = 47 at baseline and &lt;i&gt;N&lt;/i&gt; = 21 for longitudinal cognitive comparisons) and within age-decade subgroups (57-69, 70-79, 80-90 years).&lt;/p&gt;\u0000 &lt;/section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;h3&gt; RESULTS&lt;/h3&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;p&gt;Data demonstrate wide clinical and biomarker heterogeneity in this population influenced by age and sex. Plasma pTau-181 and GFAP correlate with tau PET, most strongly in left inferior temporal cortex (&lt;i&gt;p&lt;/i&gt; = 0.0002, &lt;i&gt;p&lt;/i&gt; = 0.0006, respectively). In regions beyond temporal cortex, tau PET uptake decreased with age for the same pTau-181 or GFAP concentrations. FDG PET and brain volumes correlate with tau PET in numerous regions (such as inferior temporal: &lt;i&gt;p&lt;/i&gt; = 0.0007, &lt;i&gt;p&lt;/i&gt; = 0.00001, respectively). NfL, GFAP, and all imaging modalities correlate with baseline MMSE; subsequent MMSE decline is predicted by baseline parahippocampal and lateral temporal tau PET (&lt;i&gt;p&lt;/i&gt; = 0.0007) and volume (&lt;i&gt;p&lt;/i&gt; = 0.0006). Lateral temporal FDG PET (&lt;i&gt;p&lt;/i&gt; = 0.006) and volume (&lt;i&gt;p&lt;/i&gt; = 0.0001) are most strongly associated with subsequent ADAS-cog decline. NfL correlates with FDG PET and baseline MMSE but not tau PET. Inflammation biomarkers are intercorrelated but correlated with other biomarkers in only the youngest group.&lt;/p&gt;\u0000 &lt;/section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;h3&gt; DISCUSSION&lt;/h3&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;p&gt;Associations between plasma biomarkers, imaging biomarkers, and cognitive status observed in this study provide insight into relationships among biological processes in mild to moderate AD. Findings show the potential to characterize AD patients regarding likely tau pathology, neurodegeneration, prospective clinical decline, and the importance of covariates such as age.&lt;/p&gt;\u0000 ","PeriodicalId":53225,"journal":{"name":"Alzheimer''s and Dementia: Translational Research and Clinical Interventions","volume":"10 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.9,"publicationDate":"2024-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11233274/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141581498","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Dementia severity at incident diagnosis in a population representative sample of older Americans 具有人口代表性的美国老年人样本中事件诊断时痴呆症的严重程度。
IF 4.9 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Pub Date : 2024-07-09 DOI: 10.1002/trc2.12491
Shengjia Xu, Niloofar Fouladi-Nashta, Yi Chen, Julie Zissimopoulos

INTRODUCTION

We provide the first analysis of distribution of dementia severity at incident diagnosis for a population representative sample of older Americans.

METHODS

Using data from the Aging, Demographics, and Memory Study (ADAMS), the Health Retirement Study (HRS), and traditional Medicare claims, we estimated the Clinical Dementia Rating Scale for ADAMS respondents and applied parameter estimates to predict dementia severity for HRS respondents with claims-based incident dementia diagnosis.

RESULTS

Seventy percent of older adults received a dementia diagnosis of mild cognitive impairment or mild dementia (early stages). Fewer individuals were diagnosed at early stages in years 2000 to 2008 (65%) compared to years 2009 to 2016 (76%). About 72% of non-Hispanic white persons were diagnosed at early stages, compared to 63% non-Hispanic black and 59% Hispanic persons. More males than females were diagnosed at early stages (75% vs 67%).

DISCUSSION

These data linkages allow population surveillance of early and equitable dementia detection in the older US population to assess clinical and policy levers to improve detection.

Highlights

  • For the US population 70 and older, 30% were diagnosed with dementia at a moderate or severe stage.
  • Fewer were diagnosed at early stages in years 2000 to 2008 compared to 2009 to 2016 (65% vs 76%).
  • A total of 72% of white persons were diagnosed at early stages, compared to 63% black and 59% Hispanic persons.
  • More males than females were diagnosed at early stages (75% vs 67%).
  • High wealth and education level were associated with diagnosis at early stages disease.
简介:我们首次对具有人口代表性的美国老年人样本进行了分析:我们首次分析了具有人口代表性的美国老年人样本在事件诊断时痴呆症严重程度的分布情况:利用老龄化、人口统计和记忆研究(ADAMS)、健康退休研究(HRS)以及传统医疗保险报销单的数据,我们对ADAMS受访者的临床痴呆评定量表进行了估算,并应用参数估算结果对HRS受访者的痴呆严重程度进行了预测,这些受访者的痴呆诊断是基于报销单的:70%的老年人被诊断为轻度认知障碍或轻度痴呆(早期)。与 2009 年至 2016 年(76%)相比,2000 年至 2008 年被诊断为早期阶段的人数较少(65%)。约 72% 的非西班牙裔白人被诊断为早期阶段,而非西班牙裔黑人和西班牙裔人的这一比例分别为 63% 和 59%。早期诊断的男性多于女性(75% 对 67%):讨论:通过这些数据链接,可对美国老年人口中早期和公平痴呆症检测情况进行人口监测,以评估临床和政策杠杆,提高检测率:2000年至2008年与2009年至2016年相比,早期诊断出痴呆症的人数较少(分别为65%和76%)。早期诊断出痴呆症的白人占72%,而黑人和西班牙裔分别占63%和59%。
{"title":"Dementia severity at incident diagnosis in a population representative sample of older Americans","authors":"Shengjia Xu,&nbsp;Niloofar Fouladi-Nashta,&nbsp;Yi Chen,&nbsp;Julie Zissimopoulos","doi":"10.1002/trc2.12491","DOIUrl":"10.1002/trc2.12491","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> INTRODUCTION</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>We provide the first analysis of distribution of dementia severity at incident diagnosis for a population representative sample of older Americans.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> METHODS</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Using data from the Aging, Demographics, and Memory Study (ADAMS), the Health Retirement Study (HRS), and traditional Medicare claims, we estimated the Clinical Dementia Rating Scale for ADAMS respondents and applied parameter estimates to predict dementia severity for HRS respondents with claims-based incident dementia diagnosis.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> RESULTS</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Seventy percent of older adults received a dementia diagnosis of mild cognitive impairment or mild dementia (early stages). Fewer individuals were diagnosed at early stages in years 2000 to 2008 (65%) compared to years 2009 to 2016 (76%). About 72% of non-Hispanic white persons were diagnosed at early stages, compared to 63% non-Hispanic black and 59% Hispanic persons. More males than females were diagnosed at early stages (75% vs 67%).</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> DISCUSSION</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>These data linkages allow population surveillance of early and equitable dementia detection in the older US population to assess clinical and policy levers to improve detection.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Highlights</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <div>\u0000 <ul>\u0000 \u0000 <li>For the US population 70 and older, 30% were diagnosed with dementia at a moderate or severe stage.</li>\u0000 \u0000 <li>Fewer were diagnosed at early stages in years 2000 to 2008 compared to 2009 to 2016 (65% vs 76%).</li>\u0000 \u0000 <li>A total of 72% of white persons were diagnosed at early stages, compared to 63% black and 59% Hispanic persons.</li>\u0000 \u0000 <li>More males than females were diagnosed at early stages (75% vs 67%).</li>\u0000 \u0000 <li>High wealth and education level were associated with diagnosis at early stages disease.</li>\u0000 </ul>\u0000 </div>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":53225,"journal":{"name":"Alzheimer''s and Dementia: Translational Research and Clinical Interventions","volume":"10 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.9,"publicationDate":"2024-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11231736/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141581497","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Sex, gender, sexual orientation, and more: Sexual diversity in Alzheimer's research needs a new lens to achieve inclusive research and generalizable results 性、性别、性取向等等:阿尔茨海默氏症研究中的性取向多样性需要一个新的视角,以实现包容性研究和可推广的结果。
IF 4.9 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Pub Date : 2024-06-24 DOI: 10.1002/trc2.12476
Shana D. Stites, Beans Velocci

Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) efforts in Alzheimer's disease and related dementia (ADRD) research are guiding the adoption of two-step self-report questions that capture research participants’ identity based on categories of sex, sexual orientation, and gender identity. The intent is to facilitate inclusion and representation of sexual and gender minoritized (SGM) communities in ADRD research. The data from using these questions are on a collision course with another National Institute of Aging initiative, which is aimed at understanding sex differences in ADRD mechanisms. Here, we critically analyze the goals and methods of the two initiatives. We propose that, in addition to being SGM focused, DEI efforts are needed to expand how scientists consider and measure sexual diversity itself.

Highlights

  • Sex, sexual orientation, and gender identity (SSOGI) will be asked in ADRD studies.
  • SSOGI data will expand representation of research participant identities.
  • SSOGI data are on a collision course with sex differences research.
  • Both emphasize sexual diversity (SD) largely as SSOGI identity categories.
  • Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion efforts must develop SD methods in ADRD research.
阿尔茨海默病及相关痴呆症(ADRD)研究中的多样性、公平性和包容性(DEI)工作正在指导采用两步式自我报告问题,根据性别、性取向和性别认同类别捕捉研究参与者的身份。这样做的目的是为了促进在 ADRD 研究中纳入性和性别少数群体 (SGM) 并使其具有代表性。使用这些问题得出的数据与美国国家老龄化研究所的另一项旨在了解 ADRD 机制中性别差异的计划相冲突。在此,我们对这两项计划的目标和方法进行了批判性分析。我们建议,除了关注 SGM 外,DEI 的工作还需要扩大科学家考虑和衡量性别多样性本身的方式:性别、性取向和性别认同(SSOGI)将在 ADRD 研究中被问及。SSOGI 数据将扩大研究参与者身份的代表性。SSOGI 数据与性别差异研究相冲突。两者都强调性多样性(SD)主要是 SSOGI 身份类别。Diversity、Equity 和 Inclusion 工作必须在 ADRD 研究中开发 SD 方法。
{"title":"Sex, gender, sexual orientation, and more: Sexual diversity in Alzheimer's research needs a new lens to achieve inclusive research and generalizable results","authors":"Shana D. Stites,&nbsp;Beans Velocci","doi":"10.1002/trc2.12476","DOIUrl":"10.1002/trc2.12476","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) efforts in Alzheimer's disease and related dementia (ADRD) research are guiding the adoption of two-step self-report questions that capture research participants’ identity based on categories of sex, sexual orientation, and gender identity. The intent is to facilitate inclusion and representation of sexual and gender minoritized (SGM) communities in ADRD research. The data from using these questions are on a collision course with another National Institute of Aging initiative, which is aimed at understanding sex differences in ADRD mechanisms. Here, we critically analyze the goals and methods of the two initiatives. We propose that, in addition to being SGM focused, DEI efforts are needed to expand how scientists consider and measure sexual diversity itself.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Highlights</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <div>\u0000 <ul>\u0000 \u0000 <li>Sex, sexual orientation, and gender identity (SSOGI) will be asked in ADRD studies.</li>\u0000 \u0000 <li>SSOGI data will expand representation of research participant identities.</li>\u0000 \u0000 <li>SSOGI data are on a collision course with sex differences research.</li>\u0000 \u0000 <li>Both emphasize sexual diversity (SD) largely as SSOGI identity categories.</li>\u0000 \u0000 <li>Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion efforts must develop SD methods in ADRD research.</li>\u0000 </ul>\u0000 </div>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":53225,"journal":{"name":"Alzheimer''s and Dementia: Translational Research and Clinical Interventions","volume":"10 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.9,"publicationDate":"2024-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11194612/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141447594","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Using concept mapping to identify recruitment and engagement strategies for inclusion of LGBTQIA+ populations in Alzheimer's disease and related dementia research 利用概念图确定将 LGBTQIA+ 群体纳入阿尔茨海默病及相关痴呆症研究的招募和参与策略
IF 4.9 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Pub Date : 2024-06-22 DOI: 10.1002/trc2.12477
Brittany Klenczar-Castro, Krystal R. Kittle, Joel G. Anderson, Whitney Wharton, Andrea Gilmore-Bykovskyi, N. Maritza Dowling, Jaime Perales-Puchalt, Jason D. Flatt

INTRODUCTION

Past Alzheimer's disease and related dementias (ADRD) research has not considered ways to ensure the representation of diverse sexual and gender minorities. This study used concept mapping (CM) to identify strategies for engaging and recruiting LGBTQIA+ older adults living with memory loss and their caregivers into ADRD research.

METHODS

CM, involving brainstorming, thematic analysis, and rating of strategies, was conducted with 46 members from one national and three local community advisory boards. Data was analyzed using The Concept Systems Global MAX™ web platform.

RESULTS

One hundred twenty-two solutions were identified from June through December 2022, and represented five key themes: aging focused, LGBTQIA+ specific, memory loss and caregiving support focused, physical advertisements, and other media. Promising strategies included partnering with LGBTQIA+ health centers, attending social groups for older adults, and increasing community representation in marketing.

DISCUSSION

Tailored strategies, building trust, and community involvement are essential for engaging LGBTQIA+ individuals living with memory loss or ADRD and their caregivers in ADRD-focused research.

Highlights

  • Innovative ways to ensure the inclusion of LGBTQIA+ older adults in Alzheimer's disease and related dementias (ADRD) research can be bolstered through collaboration with key community stakeholders.
  • Promising strategies for recruitment and engagement include partnering with LGBTQIA+ centers, attending social groups for older adults, and ensuring diverse representation in marketing.
  • Tailored recruitment and engagement strategies are crucial for building trust with LGBTQIA+ populations to increase participation in ADRD research.
引言 过去的阿尔茨海默病及相关痴呆症(ADRD)研究并未考虑如何确保不同性取向和性别的少数群体的代表性。本研究使用概念图(CM)来确定吸引和招募 LGBTQIA+ 失忆老年人及其照顾者参与 ADRD 研究的策略。 方法 对来自一个国家和三个地方社区咨询委员会的 46 名成员进行了概念图绘制,包括头脑风暴、主题分析和策略评级。数据使用 Concept Systems Global MAX™ 网络平台进行分析。 结果 从 2022 年 6 月到 12 月,共确定了 122 个解决方案,代表了五个关键主题:以老龄化为重点、LGBTQIA+ 特殊性、以记忆丧失和护理支持为重点、实物广告和其他媒体。有前景的策略包括与 LGBTQIA+ 健康中心合作、参加老年人社交团体以及增加营销中的社区代表性。 讨论 量身定制的策略、建立信任和社区参与对于吸引 LGBTQIA+ 失忆或 ADRD 患者及其照顾者参与 ADRD 研究至关重要。 亮点 通过与主要社区利益相关者合作,可以采用创新方法确保将 LGBTQIA+ 老年人纳入阿尔茨海默病及相关痴呆症(ADRD)研究。 有前途的招募和参与策略包括与 LGBTQIA+ 中心合作、参加老年人社交团体以及确保市场营销中的多元化代表。 量身定制的招募和参与策略对于与 LGBTQIA+ 群体建立信任以提高 ADRD 研究的参与度至关重要。
{"title":"Using concept mapping to identify recruitment and engagement strategies for inclusion of LGBTQIA+ populations in Alzheimer's disease and related dementia research","authors":"Brittany Klenczar-Castro,&nbsp;Krystal R. Kittle,&nbsp;Joel G. Anderson,&nbsp;Whitney Wharton,&nbsp;Andrea Gilmore-Bykovskyi,&nbsp;N. Maritza Dowling,&nbsp;Jaime Perales-Puchalt,&nbsp;Jason D. Flatt","doi":"10.1002/trc2.12477","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/trc2.12477","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> INTRODUCTION</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Past Alzheimer's disease and related dementias (ADRD) research has not considered ways to ensure the representation of diverse sexual and gender minorities. This study used concept mapping (CM) to identify strategies for engaging and recruiting LGBTQIA+ older adults living with memory loss and their caregivers into ADRD research.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> METHODS</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>CM, involving brainstorming, thematic analysis, and rating of strategies, was conducted with 46 members from one national and three local community advisory boards. Data was analyzed using The Concept Systems Global MAX™ web platform.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> RESULTS</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>One hundred twenty-two solutions were identified from June through December 2022, and represented five key themes: aging focused, LGBTQIA+ specific, memory loss and caregiving support focused, physical advertisements, and other media. Promising strategies included partnering with LGBTQIA+ health centers, attending social groups for older adults, and increasing community representation in marketing.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> DISCUSSION</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Tailored strategies, building trust, and community involvement are essential for engaging LGBTQIA+ individuals living with memory loss or ADRD and their caregivers in ADRD-focused research.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Highlights</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <div>\u0000 <ul>\u0000 \u0000 <li>Innovative ways to ensure the inclusion of LGBTQIA+ older adults in Alzheimer's disease and related dementias (ADRD) research can be bolstered through collaboration with key community stakeholders.</li>\u0000 \u0000 <li>Promising strategies for recruitment and engagement include partnering with LGBTQIA+ centers, attending social groups for older adults, and ensuring diverse representation in marketing.</li>\u0000 \u0000 <li>Tailored recruitment and engagement strategies are crucial for building trust with LGBTQIA+ populations to increase participation in ADRD research.</li>\u0000 </ul>\u0000 </div>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":53225,"journal":{"name":"Alzheimer''s and Dementia: Translational Research and Clinical Interventions","volume":"10 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.9,"publicationDate":"2024-06-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/trc2.12477","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141441403","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Hearing loss and cognitive decline: Prioritizing equity in a world in which hearing health matters 听力损失与认知能力下降:在听力健康至关重要的世界中优先考虑公平问题
IF 4.9 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Pub Date : 2024-06-21 DOI: 10.1002/trc2.12484
Carrie L. Nieman, Roland J. Thorpe Jr., Esther S. Oh

Alzheimer's disease and related dementias (ADRDs) and age-related hearing loss are the intersection of two major public health challenges. With age as the primary risk factor for both disease processes, the burden of ADRDs and age-related hearing loss is growing, and each field maintains significant barriers to broadscale identification and management that is affordable and accessible. With the disproportionate burden of ADRDs among racial and ethnic minority older adults and existing disparities within hearing care, both areas face challenges in achieving equitable access and outcomes across diverse populations. The publication of the Aging and Cognitive Health Evaluation in Elders (ACHIEVE) trial in July 2023 marked a significant moment in the fields of brain and hearing health. The ACHIEVE trial was the first randomized controlled trial to examine whether providing hearing intervention, specifically provision of hearing aids, compared to an education control, would reduce cognitive changes over 3 years. The participants most at risk for cognitive decline, with lower education, lower income, more likely to identify as Black, and have more cardiovascular risk factors, were the participants who benefited most from the hearing intervention and are also the least likely to be represented in research and the least likely to obtain hearing care. With growing evidence of the interconnection between cognitive and sensory health, we have an opportunity to prioritize equity, from purposeful inclusion of diverse participants in trials to influencing the emerging market of over-the-counter hearing aids to supporting expanded models of hearing care that reach those who have traditionally gone unserved. No longer can hearing go unrecognized by clinicians, researchers, and advocates for brain health. At the same time, the fields of brain and hearing health must center equity if we are going to meet the needs of diverse older adults in a world in which hearing health matters.

阿尔茨海默病及相关痴呆症(ADRDs)和老年性听力损失是两大公共卫生挑战的交汇点。年龄是这两种疾病进程的主要风险因素,因此 ADRDs 和老年性听力损失的负担日益加重,而每个领域都面临着巨大的障碍,无法以可负担得起和可获得的方式进行广泛的识别和管理。由于少数种族和少数族裔老年人的 ADRD 负担过重,以及听力保健中存在的差异,这两个领域在实现不同人群的公平获取和结果方面都面临着挑战。2023 年 7 月发表的《老年人衰老与认知健康评估》(ACHIEVE)试验标志着脑健康和听力健康领域的一个重要时刻。ACHIEVE 试验是首个随机对照试验,旨在研究与教育对照相比,提供听力干预(特别是提供助听器)是否会在 3 年内减少认知变化。认知能力下降风险最高的参与者受教育程度较低、收入较低、更有可能被认定为黑人、心血管风险因素较多,他们从听力干预中获益最多,也最不可能参与研究,最不可能获得听力保健。随着越来越多的证据表明认知健康与感官健康之间存在相互联系,我们有机会优先考虑公平问题,从有目的地将不同的参与者纳入试验,到影响非处方助听器的新兴市场,再到支持听力保健的扩展模式,以惠及那些传统上得不到服务的人。临床医生、研究人员和脑健康倡导者再也不能忽视听力问题了。与此同时,如果我们要在听力健康至关重要的世界中满足不同老年人的需求,大脑和听力健康领域就必须以公平为中心。
{"title":"Hearing loss and cognitive decline: Prioritizing equity in a world in which hearing health matters","authors":"Carrie L. Nieman,&nbsp;Roland J. Thorpe Jr.,&nbsp;Esther S. Oh","doi":"10.1002/trc2.12484","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/trc2.12484","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Alzheimer's disease and related dementias (ADRDs) and age-related hearing loss are the intersection of two major public health challenges. With age as the primary risk factor for both disease processes, the burden of ADRDs and age-related hearing loss is growing, and each field maintains significant barriers to broadscale identification and management that is affordable and accessible. With the disproportionate burden of ADRDs among racial and ethnic minority older adults and existing disparities within hearing care, both areas face challenges in achieving equitable access and outcomes across diverse populations. The publication of the Aging and Cognitive Health Evaluation in Elders (ACHIEVE) trial in July 2023 marked a significant moment in the fields of brain and hearing health. The ACHIEVE trial was the first randomized controlled trial to examine whether providing hearing intervention, specifically provision of hearing aids, compared to an education control, would reduce cognitive changes over 3 years. The participants most at risk for cognitive decline, with lower education, lower income, more likely to identify as Black, and have more cardiovascular risk factors, were the participants who benefited most from the hearing intervention and are also the least likely to be represented in research and the least likely to obtain hearing care. With growing evidence of the interconnection between cognitive and sensory health, we have an opportunity to prioritize equity, from purposeful inclusion of diverse participants in trials to influencing the emerging market of over-the-counter hearing aids to supporting expanded models of hearing care that reach those who have traditionally gone unserved. No longer can hearing go unrecognized by clinicians, researchers, and advocates for brain health. At the same time, the fields of brain and hearing health must center equity if we are going to meet the needs of diverse older adults in a world in which hearing health matters.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":53225,"journal":{"name":"Alzheimer''s and Dementia: Translational Research and Clinical Interventions","volume":"10 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.9,"publicationDate":"2024-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/trc2.12484","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141439619","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A service-oriented approach to clinical trial recruitment for dementia and brain health: Methods and case examples of MyAlliance for Brain Health 以服务为导向的痴呆症和脑健康临床试验招募方法:MyAlliance for Brain Health 的方法和案例。
IF 4.9 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Pub Date : 2024-06-20 DOI: 10.1002/trc2.12475
Eric D. Vidoni, Emma Swinford, Kelli Barton, Jaime Perales-Puchalt, C. Michelle Niedens, Tina Lewandowski, Tiffany Schwasinger-Schmidt, Jill Peltzer, JoEllen Wurth, Jannette Berkley-Patton, Ryan A. Townley, W. Todd Moore, Ashley R. Shaw, Mickeal N. Key, Erica Andrade, Melissa Robinson, Susan Sprague, Aiden Bondurant, Debra Brook, Jennifer Freund, Jeffrey M. Burns
<div> <section> <h3> INTRODUCTION</h3> <p>Recruitment of sufficient and diverse participants into clinical research for Alzheimer's disease and related dementias remains a formidable challenge. The primary goal of this manuscript is to provide an overview of an approach to diversifying research recruitment and to provide case examples of several methods for achieving greater diversity in clinical research enrollment.</p> </section> <section> <h3> METHODS</h3> <p>The University of Kansas Alzheimer's Disease Research Center (KU ADRC) developed MyAlliance for Brain Health (MyAlliance), a service-oriented recruitment model. MyAlliance comprises a Primary Care Provider Network, a Patient and Family Network, and a Community Organization Network, each delivering tailored value to relevant parties while facilitating research referrals.</p> </section> <section> <h3> RESULTS</h3> <p>We review three methods for encouraging increased diversity in clinical research participation. Initial outcomes reveal an increase in underrepresented participants from 17% to 27% in a research registry. Enrollments into studies supported by the research registry experienced a 51% increase in proportion of participants from underrepresented communities.</p> </section> <section> <h3> DISCUSSION</h3> <p>MyAlliance shifts power, resources, and knowledge to community advocates, promoting brain health awareness and research participation, and demands substantial financial investment and administrative commitment. MyAlliance offers valuable lessons for building sustainable, community-centered research recruitment infrastructure, emphasizing the importance of localized engagement and cultural understanding.</p> </section> <section> <h3> Highlights</h3> <div> <ul> <li>MyAlliance led to a significant increase in the representation of underrepresented racial and ethnic groups and individuals from rural areas.</li> <li>The service-oriented approach facilitated long-term community engagement and trust-building, extending partnerships between an academic medical center and community organizations.</li> <li>While effective, MyAlliance required substantial financial investment, with costs including infrastructure development, staff support, partner organization compensation, and promotional activities, underscoring the resource-intensive nature of i
导言:在阿尔茨海默病及相关痴呆症的临床研究中招募足够的多元化参与者仍然是一项艰巨的挑战。本手稿的主要目的是概述实现研究人员招募多样化的方法,并提供案例说明实现临床研究人员招募多样化的几种方法:堪萨斯大学阿尔茨海默病研究中心(KU ADRC)开发了 "我的脑健康联盟"(MyAlliance for Brain Health,MyAlliance)这一以服务为导向的招募模式。MyAlliance 由初级保健提供者网络、患者和家庭网络以及社区组织网络组成,每个网络都为相关方提供量身定制的价值,同时促进研究转介:我们回顾了鼓励临床研究参与多元化的三种方法。初步结果显示,在一个研究注册机构中,代表性不足的参与者从 17% 增加到 27%。在研究注册中心的支持下,来自代表性不足社区的研究参与者比例增加了 51%:讨论:"我的联盟 "将权力、资源和知识转移给了社区倡导者,促进了对大脑健康的认识和研究参与,并要求大量的财政投入和行政承诺。我的联盟 "为建立可持续的、以社区为中心的研究招募基础设施提供了宝贵经验,强调了本地化参与和文化理解的重要性:我的联盟 "使代表人数不足的种族和民族群体以及来自农村地区的个人的代表人数显著增加。"我的联盟 "以服务为导向的方法促进了社区的长期参与和信任的建立,扩大了学术医学中心和社区组织之间的合作关系。"我的联盟 "虽然有效,但需要大量的资金投入,包括基础设施建设、员工支持、合作组织报酬和宣传活动等费用,突出了包容性研究招募工作的资源密集性。
{"title":"A service-oriented approach to clinical trial recruitment for dementia and brain health: Methods and case examples of MyAlliance for Brain Health","authors":"Eric D. Vidoni,&nbsp;Emma Swinford,&nbsp;Kelli Barton,&nbsp;Jaime Perales-Puchalt,&nbsp;C. Michelle Niedens,&nbsp;Tina Lewandowski,&nbsp;Tiffany Schwasinger-Schmidt,&nbsp;Jill Peltzer,&nbsp;JoEllen Wurth,&nbsp;Jannette Berkley-Patton,&nbsp;Ryan A. Townley,&nbsp;W. Todd Moore,&nbsp;Ashley R. Shaw,&nbsp;Mickeal N. Key,&nbsp;Erica Andrade,&nbsp;Melissa Robinson,&nbsp;Susan Sprague,&nbsp;Aiden Bondurant,&nbsp;Debra Brook,&nbsp;Jennifer Freund,&nbsp;Jeffrey M. Burns","doi":"10.1002/trc2.12475","DOIUrl":"10.1002/trc2.12475","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;div&gt;\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 &lt;section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;h3&gt; INTRODUCTION&lt;/h3&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;p&gt;Recruitment of sufficient and diverse participants into clinical research for Alzheimer's disease and related dementias remains a formidable challenge. The primary goal of this manuscript is to provide an overview of an approach to diversifying research recruitment and to provide case examples of several methods for achieving greater diversity in clinical research enrollment.&lt;/p&gt;\u0000 &lt;/section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;h3&gt; METHODS&lt;/h3&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;p&gt;The University of Kansas Alzheimer's Disease Research Center (KU ADRC) developed MyAlliance for Brain Health (MyAlliance), a service-oriented recruitment model. MyAlliance comprises a Primary Care Provider Network, a Patient and Family Network, and a Community Organization Network, each delivering tailored value to relevant parties while facilitating research referrals.&lt;/p&gt;\u0000 &lt;/section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;h3&gt; RESULTS&lt;/h3&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;p&gt;We review three methods for encouraging increased diversity in clinical research participation. Initial outcomes reveal an increase in underrepresented participants from 17% to 27% in a research registry. Enrollments into studies supported by the research registry experienced a 51% increase in proportion of participants from underrepresented communities.&lt;/p&gt;\u0000 &lt;/section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;h3&gt; DISCUSSION&lt;/h3&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;p&gt;MyAlliance shifts power, resources, and knowledge to community advocates, promoting brain health awareness and research participation, and demands substantial financial investment and administrative commitment. MyAlliance offers valuable lessons for building sustainable, community-centered research recruitment infrastructure, emphasizing the importance of localized engagement and cultural understanding.&lt;/p&gt;\u0000 &lt;/section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;h3&gt; Highlights&lt;/h3&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;div&gt;\u0000 &lt;ul&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;li&gt;MyAlliance led to a significant increase in the representation of underrepresented racial and ethnic groups and individuals from rural areas.&lt;/li&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;li&gt;The service-oriented approach facilitated long-term community engagement and trust-building, extending partnerships between an academic medical center and community organizations.&lt;/li&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;li&gt;While effective, MyAlliance required substantial financial investment, with costs including infrastructure development, staff support, partner organization compensation, and promotional activities, underscoring the resource-intensive nature of i","PeriodicalId":53225,"journal":{"name":"Alzheimer''s and Dementia: Translational Research and Clinical Interventions","volume":"10 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.9,"publicationDate":"2024-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11187743/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141433350","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Discrepancies between self- and proxy-rated quality of life in people living with dementia 痴呆症患者自评和代评生活质量之间的差异。
IF 4.8 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Pub Date : 2024-06-19 DOI: 10.1002/trc2.12486
Maresa Buchholz, Lidia Engel, Fabian Kleinke, Franka Mühlichen, Michelle Pfaff, Moritz Platen, Anika Rädke, Annelie Scharf, Niklas Weber, Neeltje van den Berg, Wolfgang Hoffmann, Bernhard Michalowsky
<div> <section> <h3> INTRODUCTION</h3> <p>The aim of this study was to analyze discrepancies between self- and proxy-rated health-related quality of life (HRQoL), measured with the EuroQol 5 Dimension 5 Level survey (EQ-5D-5L), in people living with dementia (PlwD) and their caregivers on an individual response level.</p> </section> <section> <h3> METHODS</h3> <p>EQ-5D-5L, sociodemographic and clinical data were obtained from baseline data of <i>n</i> = 174 dyads of a cluster-randomized, controlled intervention trial. Self- and proxy-rated EQ-5D-5L health profiles were evaluated in terms of response distribution and agreement (weighted Kappa), and discrepancies in individual dimension level were analyzed using the Paretian Classification of Health Change (PCHC) as well as the presence and degree of inconsistencies between ratings.</p> </section> <section> <h3> RESULTS</h3> <p>PlwD had a mean age of 80.1, nearly the half were female and 82.3% were mildly to moderately cognitively impaired. PlwD reported a higher utility index than caregiver proxies (mean 0.75 vs. 0.68, 83% of PlwD > 0.5). According to the PCHC and inconsistency approach, 95% of PlwD rated their health differently compared to proxies; 66% with divergent responses in at least three EQ-5D-5L dimensions. Nine dyads (5%) showed identical ratings. Discrepancies of one higher or lower EQ-5D-5L response represented the most frequent discrepancy (35.4%). Caregivers were two times more likely to report “moderate problems,” representing the middle of the 5-point Likert scale. <i>Usual activities</i> had the lowest agreement between ratings (weighted kappa = 0.23). In PlwD reporting no or some problems in EQ-5D-5L-dimensions, proxies were more likely to report more problems and vice versa, especially in the more observable dimension <i>usual activities</i> and less likely in the less observable domains <i>pain/discomfort</i> and <i>anxiety/depression</i>.</p> </section> <section> <h3> DISCUSSION</h3> <p>The central tendency bias observed in proxy-ratings could be associated with assessment uncertainties, resulting in an underestimation (overestimation) in PlwD reporting better (worse) health. This diverging trend extends the knowledge from previous studies and underlines the need for more methodological research in this area.</p> </section> <section> <h3> Highlights</h3> <div> <ul> <li>People living with dementia (PlwD) rate their
简介本研究旨在分析痴呆症患者(PlwD)及其照顾者在个人反应层面上自我评定和代理评定的健康相关生活质量(HRQoL)之间的差异:方法:EQ-5D-5L、社会人口学和临床数据均来自群组随机对照干预试验中 n = 174 个二元组的基线数据。根据反应分布和一致性(加权卡帕)对自评和代理评定的 EQ-5D-5L 健康状况进行了评估,并使用健康变化的帕雷特分类法(PCHC)分析了个体维度水平的差异以及评分之间是否存在不一致和不一致的程度:PlwD的平均年龄为80.1岁,近一半为女性,82.3%为轻度至中度认知障碍。患者报告的效用指数高于护理代理(平均 0.75 对 0.68,83% 的患者效用指数大于 0.5)。根据 PCHC 和不一致性方法,95% 的 PlwD 对其健康状况的评价与代理人不同;66% 的 PlwD 在至少三个 EQ-5D-5L 维度上的回答存在差异。有 9 组(5%)表现出相同的评分。最常见的差异是 EQ-5D-5L 回答高或低一个维度(35.4%)。护理人员报告 "中等问题 "的几率是 "中等问题 "的两倍,"中等问题 "代表 5 点李克特量表的中间值。通常活动的评分之间的一致性最低(加权卡帕 = 0.23)。在报告 EQ-5D-5L 维度中没有问题或有一些问题的 PlwD 中,代理人更有可能报告更多问题,反之亦然,尤其是在可观察性较强的维度 "惯常活动 "中,而在可观察性较弱的领域 "疼痛/不适 "和 "焦虑/抑郁 "中,代理人报告更多问题的可能性较小:在代理评分中观察到的中心倾向偏差可能与评估的不确定性有关,从而导致低估(高估)了报告健康状况较好(较差)的瘫痪病人。这种差异趋势扩展了以往研究的知识,并强调了在这一领域开展更多方法学研究的必要性:重点:痴呆症患者(PlwD)对自己健康状况的评价与代理人不同。当自我评价较低或较高时,代理人的评价会高估或低估PlwD的健康状况。
{"title":"Discrepancies between self- and proxy-rated quality of life in people living with dementia","authors":"Maresa Buchholz,&nbsp;Lidia Engel,&nbsp;Fabian Kleinke,&nbsp;Franka Mühlichen,&nbsp;Michelle Pfaff,&nbsp;Moritz Platen,&nbsp;Anika Rädke,&nbsp;Annelie Scharf,&nbsp;Niklas Weber,&nbsp;Neeltje van den Berg,&nbsp;Wolfgang Hoffmann,&nbsp;Bernhard Michalowsky","doi":"10.1002/trc2.12486","DOIUrl":"10.1002/trc2.12486","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;div&gt;\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 &lt;section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;h3&gt; INTRODUCTION&lt;/h3&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;p&gt;The aim of this study was to analyze discrepancies between self- and proxy-rated health-related quality of life (HRQoL), measured with the EuroQol 5 Dimension 5 Level survey (EQ-5D-5L), in people living with dementia (PlwD) and their caregivers on an individual response level.&lt;/p&gt;\u0000 &lt;/section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;h3&gt; METHODS&lt;/h3&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;p&gt;EQ-5D-5L, sociodemographic and clinical data were obtained from baseline data of &lt;i&gt;n&lt;/i&gt; = 174 dyads of a cluster-randomized, controlled intervention trial. Self- and proxy-rated EQ-5D-5L health profiles were evaluated in terms of response distribution and agreement (weighted Kappa), and discrepancies in individual dimension level were analyzed using the Paretian Classification of Health Change (PCHC) as well as the presence and degree of inconsistencies between ratings.&lt;/p&gt;\u0000 &lt;/section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;h3&gt; RESULTS&lt;/h3&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;p&gt;PlwD had a mean age of 80.1, nearly the half were female and 82.3% were mildly to moderately cognitively impaired. PlwD reported a higher utility index than caregiver proxies (mean 0.75 vs. 0.68, 83% of PlwD &gt; 0.5). According to the PCHC and inconsistency approach, 95% of PlwD rated their health differently compared to proxies; 66% with divergent responses in at least three EQ-5D-5L dimensions. Nine dyads (5%) showed identical ratings. Discrepancies of one higher or lower EQ-5D-5L response represented the most frequent discrepancy (35.4%). Caregivers were two times more likely to report “moderate problems,” representing the middle of the 5-point Likert scale. &lt;i&gt;Usual activities&lt;/i&gt; had the lowest agreement between ratings (weighted kappa = 0.23). In PlwD reporting no or some problems in EQ-5D-5L-dimensions, proxies were more likely to report more problems and vice versa, especially in the more observable dimension &lt;i&gt;usual activities&lt;/i&gt; and less likely in the less observable domains &lt;i&gt;pain/discomfort&lt;/i&gt; and &lt;i&gt;anxiety/depression&lt;/i&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;\u0000 &lt;/section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;h3&gt; DISCUSSION&lt;/h3&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;p&gt;The central tendency bias observed in proxy-ratings could be associated with assessment uncertainties, resulting in an underestimation (overestimation) in PlwD reporting better (worse) health. This diverging trend extends the knowledge from previous studies and underlines the need for more methodological research in this area.&lt;/p&gt;\u0000 &lt;/section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;h3&gt; Highlights&lt;/h3&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;div&gt;\u0000 &lt;ul&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;li&gt;People living with dementia (PlwD) rate their ","PeriodicalId":53225,"journal":{"name":"Alzheimer''s and Dementia: Translational Research and Clinical Interventions","volume":"10 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.8,"publicationDate":"2024-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11186300/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141428290","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Communicating Alzheimer's biomarker results to cognitively unimpaired research participants: Satisfaction, utility, and impact on research attitudes 向认知能力未受损的研究参与者传达阿尔茨海默氏症生物标志物结果:满意度、实用性及对研究态度的影响
IF 4.8 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Pub Date : 2024-06-14 DOI: 10.1002/trc2.12483
Claire M. Erickson, Fred B. Ketchum, Kristin E. Basche, Nathaniel A. Chin, Marcella L. Eveler, Lindsay R. Clark
<div> <section> <h3> Introduction</h3> <p>Recruitment and retention pose a significant challenge to Alzheimer's disease (AD) research. Returning AD biomarker results to participants has been proposed as a means to improve recruitment and retention. We present findings related to participant satisfaction, utility, and impact on research attitudes from the amyloid positron emission tomography (PET) disclosure sub-study within the Wisconsin Registry for Alzheimer's Prevention (WRAP).</p> </section> <section> <h3> Methods</h3> <p>Ninety-nine cognitively unimpaired WRAP participants learned their amyloid PET results (mean age ± SD = 72.0 ± 4.8). Measures of reasons for wanting to learn results, study comprehension, result utility, visit satisfaction, research attitudes, and future study enrollment willingness were collected. Between-group, chi-squared analysis was conducted to determine differences by result type (elevated vs. not elevated amyloid PET result) in study comprehension, result utility, and visit satisfaction. Linear mixed-effects modeling was used to evaluate changes in research attitudes and enrollment willingness as a function of time, amyloid result type (elevated/not elevated), and their interaction.</p> </section> <section> <h3> Results</h3> <p>The reasons most frequently endorsed for wanting to learn amyloid PET result was a “desire to contribute to research on Alzheimer's disease dementia” and “to inform preventative measures [one] might take (e.g., change diet, exercise, or other lifestyle changes).” Overall, participants reported understanding the results and found learning them useful. Satisfaction with the study visits was overwhelmingly high, with over 80% agreeing with visit usefulness and their satisfaction. Few differences were found between participants who learned an elevated and not elevated result. Over the course of the study, participants who learned an elevated amyloid PET result reported higher willingness to enroll in drug trials (beta: 0.12, <i>p</i> = 0.01) and lifestyle interventions (beta: 0.10, <i>p</i> = 0.02) compared to participants who learned a not elevated result.</p> </section> <section> <h3> Discussion</h3> <p>Formal incorporation of disclosure practices may encourage participant recruitment and retention within AD research.</p> </section> <section> <h3> Highlights</h3> <div> <ul> <li>Participants wanted to learn their amyloid results to contri
导言:招募和留住参与者是阿尔茨海默病(AD)研究面临的重大挑战。将阿兹海默病生物标记物结果返还给参与者被认为是提高招募和保留率的一种方法。我们介绍了威斯康星州阿尔茨海默氏症预防登记处 (WRAP) 的淀粉样蛋白正电子发射断层扫描 (PET) 披露子研究中与参与者满意度、实用性和对研究态度的影响相关的研究结果。 方法 99 名认知能力未受损的 WRAP 参与者了解了他们的淀粉样蛋白 PET 结果(平均年龄 ± SD = 72.0 ± 4.8)。研究人员对希望了解结果的原因、研究理解能力、结果效用、就诊满意度、研究态度和未来研究注册意愿进行了测量。进行了组间卡方分析,以确定不同结果类型(淀粉样蛋白 PET 结果升高与未升高)在研究理解、结果效用和就诊满意度方面的差异。线性混合效应模型用于评估研究态度和注册意愿随时间、淀粉样蛋白结果类型(升高/未升高)及其交互作用而发生的变化。 结果 希望了解淀粉样蛋白 PET 结果的最常见原因是 "希望为阿尔茨海默病痴呆症的研究做出贡献 "和 "为[自己]可能采取的预防措施(如改变饮食、运动或其他生活方式)提供信息"。总体而言,参与者表示理解研究结果,并认为学习这些结果很有用。参与者对研究访问的满意度非常高,超过 80% 的参与者对访问的有用性和满意度表示赞同。了解到升高和未升高结果的参与者之间几乎没有差异。在研究过程中,得知淀粉样蛋白 PET 结果升高的参与者与得知结果未升高的参与者相比,更愿意参加药物试验(贝塔值:0.12,p = 0.01)和生活方式干预(贝塔值:0.10,p = 0.02)。 讨论 在注意力缺失症研究中,正式纳入信息披露做法可能会鼓励参与者的招募和保留。 亮点 参与者希望了解自己的淀粉样蛋白结果,以便为研究做出贡献。 对披露和披露后访问的满意度总体较高。 返回注意力缺失症生物标志物可提高参与研究的意愿。
{"title":"Communicating Alzheimer's biomarker results to cognitively unimpaired research participants: Satisfaction, utility, and impact on research attitudes","authors":"Claire M. Erickson,&nbsp;Fred B. Ketchum,&nbsp;Kristin E. Basche,&nbsp;Nathaniel A. Chin,&nbsp;Marcella L. Eveler,&nbsp;Lindsay R. Clark","doi":"10.1002/trc2.12483","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/trc2.12483","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;div&gt;\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 &lt;section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;h3&gt; Introduction&lt;/h3&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;p&gt;Recruitment and retention pose a significant challenge to Alzheimer's disease (AD) research. Returning AD biomarker results to participants has been proposed as a means to improve recruitment and retention. We present findings related to participant satisfaction, utility, and impact on research attitudes from the amyloid positron emission tomography (PET) disclosure sub-study within the Wisconsin Registry for Alzheimer's Prevention (WRAP).&lt;/p&gt;\u0000 &lt;/section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;h3&gt; Methods&lt;/h3&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;p&gt;Ninety-nine cognitively unimpaired WRAP participants learned their amyloid PET results (mean age ± SD = 72.0 ± 4.8). Measures of reasons for wanting to learn results, study comprehension, result utility, visit satisfaction, research attitudes, and future study enrollment willingness were collected. Between-group, chi-squared analysis was conducted to determine differences by result type (elevated vs. not elevated amyloid PET result) in study comprehension, result utility, and visit satisfaction. Linear mixed-effects modeling was used to evaluate changes in research attitudes and enrollment willingness as a function of time, amyloid result type (elevated/not elevated), and their interaction.&lt;/p&gt;\u0000 &lt;/section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;h3&gt; Results&lt;/h3&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;p&gt;The reasons most frequently endorsed for wanting to learn amyloid PET result was a “desire to contribute to research on Alzheimer's disease dementia” and “to inform preventative measures [one] might take (e.g., change diet, exercise, or other lifestyle changes).” Overall, participants reported understanding the results and found learning them useful. Satisfaction with the study visits was overwhelmingly high, with over 80% agreeing with visit usefulness and their satisfaction. Few differences were found between participants who learned an elevated and not elevated result. Over the course of the study, participants who learned an elevated amyloid PET result reported higher willingness to enroll in drug trials (beta: 0.12, &lt;i&gt;p&lt;/i&gt; = 0.01) and lifestyle interventions (beta: 0.10, &lt;i&gt;p&lt;/i&gt; = 0.02) compared to participants who learned a not elevated result.&lt;/p&gt;\u0000 &lt;/section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;h3&gt; Discussion&lt;/h3&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;p&gt;Formal incorporation of disclosure practices may encourage participant recruitment and retention within AD research.&lt;/p&gt;\u0000 &lt;/section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;h3&gt; Highlights&lt;/h3&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;div&gt;\u0000 &lt;ul&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;li&gt;Participants wanted to learn their amyloid results to contri","PeriodicalId":53225,"journal":{"name":"Alzheimer''s and Dementia: Translational Research and Clinical Interventions","volume":"10 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.8,"publicationDate":"2024-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/trc2.12483","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141326679","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Assessing tilavonemab efficacy in early Alzheimer's disease via longitudinal item response theory modeling 通过纵向项目反应理论模型评估替拉伐单抗对早期阿尔茨海默病的疗效
IF 4.8 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Pub Date : 2024-06-04 DOI: 10.1002/trc2.12471
Xiaoxiao Zhou, Haotian Zou, Michael W. Lutz, Konstantin Arbeev, Igor Akushevich, Anatoli Yashin, Kathleen A. Welsh-Bohmer, Sheng Luo
<div> <section> <h3> INTRODUCTION</h3> <p>Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a neurodegenerative disorder characterized by declines in cognitive and functional severities. This research utilized the Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) to assess the influence of tilavonemab on these deteriorations.</p> </section> <section> <h3> METHODS</h3> <p>Longitudinal Item Response Theory (IRT) models were employed to analyze CDR domains in early-stage AD patients. Both unidimensional and multidimensional models were contrasted to elucidate the trajectories of cognitive and functional severities.</p> </section> <section> <h3> RESULTS</h3> <p>We observed significant temporal increases in both cognitive and functional severities, with the cognitive severity deteriorating at a quicker rate. Tilavonemab did not demonstrate a statistically significant effect on the progression in either severity. Furthermore, a significant positive association was identified between the baselines and progression rates of both severities.</p> </section> <section> <h3> DISCUSSION</h3> <p>While tilavonemab failed to mitigate impairment progression, our multidimensional IRT analysis illuminated the interconnected progression of cognitive and functional declines in AD, suggesting a comprehensive perspective on disease trajectories.</p> </section> <section> <h3> Highlights</h3> <div> <ol> <li> <p>Utilized longitudinal Item Response Theory (IRT) models to analyze the Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) domains in early-stage Alzheimer's disease (AD) patients, comparing unidimensional and multidimensional models.</p> </li> <li> <p>Observed significant temporal increases in both cognitive and functional severities, with cognitive severity deteriorating at a faster rate, while tilavonemab showed no statistically significant effect on either domain's progression.</p> </li> <li> <p>Found a significant positive association between the baseline severities and their progression rates, indicating interconnected progression patterns of cognitive and functional declines in AD.</p> </li> <li> <p>Introduced the application of multidimensional longitudinal IRT models t
引言 阿尔茨海默病(AD)是一种神经退行性疾病,其特征是认知能力和功能严重下降。本研究利用临床痴呆评分(CDR)来评估替拉沃尼单抗对这些退化的影响。 方法 采用纵向项目反应理论(IRT)模型分析早期 AD 患者的 CDR 领域。对单维模型和多维模型进行对比,以阐明认知和功能严重程度的变化轨迹。 结果 我们观察到认知和功能严重程度在时间上都有明显增加,其中认知严重程度的恶化速度更快。替拉沃尼单抗对这两种严重程度的恶化均无统计学意义。此外,两种严重程度的基线和进展率之间存在明显的正相关。 讨论 虽然替拉沃尼单抗未能缓解损伤进展,但我们的多维 IRT 分析揭示了注意力缺失症认知和功能衰退的相互关联性,提出了一种全面的疾病轨迹视角。 研究亮点 利用纵向项目反应理论(IRT)模型分析早期阿尔茨海默病(AD)患者的临床痴呆评分(CDR)域,比较单维模型和多维模型。 观察到认知和功能严重程度在时间上都有明显增加,认知严重程度恶化的速度更快,而替拉韦莫单抗对这两个领域的进展都没有统计学意义上的影响。 发现基线严重程度与其进展速度之间存在明显的正相关,这表明认知和功能衰退在 AD 中的进展模式是相互关联的。 介绍了多维纵向IRT模型的应用,为早期AD认知和功能严重程度的发展轨迹提供了一个全面的视角,为未来的研究提出了新的途径,包括纳入时间随机效应和数据驱动的IRT模型。
{"title":"Assessing tilavonemab efficacy in early Alzheimer's disease via longitudinal item response theory modeling","authors":"Xiaoxiao Zhou,&nbsp;Haotian Zou,&nbsp;Michael W. Lutz,&nbsp;Konstantin Arbeev,&nbsp;Igor Akushevich,&nbsp;Anatoli Yashin,&nbsp;Kathleen A. Welsh-Bohmer,&nbsp;Sheng Luo","doi":"10.1002/trc2.12471","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/trc2.12471","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;div&gt;\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 &lt;section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;h3&gt; INTRODUCTION&lt;/h3&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;p&gt;Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a neurodegenerative disorder characterized by declines in cognitive and functional severities. This research utilized the Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) to assess the influence of tilavonemab on these deteriorations.&lt;/p&gt;\u0000 &lt;/section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;h3&gt; METHODS&lt;/h3&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;p&gt;Longitudinal Item Response Theory (IRT) models were employed to analyze CDR domains in early-stage AD patients. Both unidimensional and multidimensional models were contrasted to elucidate the trajectories of cognitive and functional severities.&lt;/p&gt;\u0000 &lt;/section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;h3&gt; RESULTS&lt;/h3&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;p&gt;We observed significant temporal increases in both cognitive and functional severities, with the cognitive severity deteriorating at a quicker rate. Tilavonemab did not demonstrate a statistically significant effect on the progression in either severity. Furthermore, a significant positive association was identified between the baselines and progression rates of both severities.&lt;/p&gt;\u0000 &lt;/section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;h3&gt; DISCUSSION&lt;/h3&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;p&gt;While tilavonemab failed to mitigate impairment progression, our multidimensional IRT analysis illuminated the interconnected progression of cognitive and functional declines in AD, suggesting a comprehensive perspective on disease trajectories.&lt;/p&gt;\u0000 &lt;/section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;h3&gt; Highlights&lt;/h3&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;div&gt;\u0000 &lt;ol&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;li&gt;\u0000 &lt;p&gt;Utilized longitudinal Item Response Theory (IRT) models to analyze the Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) domains in early-stage Alzheimer's disease (AD) patients, comparing unidimensional and multidimensional models.&lt;/p&gt;\u0000 &lt;/li&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;li&gt;\u0000 &lt;p&gt;Observed significant temporal increases in both cognitive and functional severities, with cognitive severity deteriorating at a faster rate, while tilavonemab showed no statistically significant effect on either domain's progression.&lt;/p&gt;\u0000 &lt;/li&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;li&gt;\u0000 &lt;p&gt;Found a significant positive association between the baseline severities and their progression rates, indicating interconnected progression patterns of cognitive and functional declines in AD.&lt;/p&gt;\u0000 &lt;/li&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;li&gt;\u0000 &lt;p&gt;Introduced the application of multidimensional longitudinal IRT models t","PeriodicalId":53225,"journal":{"name":"Alzheimer''s and Dementia: Translational Research and Clinical Interventions","volume":"10 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.8,"publicationDate":"2024-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/trc2.12471","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141245715","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Genetic associations with psychosis and affective disturbance in Alzheimer's disease 阿尔茨海默病中精神病和情感障碍的遗传关联。
IF 4.8 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Pub Date : 2024-05-23 DOI: 10.1002/trc2.12472
Inga Margret Antonsdottir, Byron Creese, Lambertus Klei, Mary Ann A. DeMichele-Sweet, Elise A. Weamer, Pablo Garcia-Gonzalez, Marta Marquie, Mercè Boada, Emilio Alarcón-Martín, Sergi Valero, NIA-LOAD Family Based Study Consortium, Alzheimer's Disease Genetics Consortium (ADGC), AddNeuroMed Consortium, Yushi Liu, Basavaraj Hooli, Dag Aarsland, Geir Selbaek, Sverre Bergh, Arvid Rongve, Ingvild Saltvedt, Håvard K. Skjellegrind, Bo Engdahl, Ole A. Andreassen, Barbara Borroni, Patrizia Mecocci, Yehani Wedatilake, Richard Mayeux, Tatiana Foroud, Agustín Ruiz, Oscar L. Lopez, M. Ilyas Kamboh, Clive Ballard, Bernie Devlin, Constantine Lyketsos, Robert A. Sweet
<div> <section> <h3> INTRODUCTION</h3> <p>Individuals with Alzheimer's disease (AD) commonly experience neuropsychiatric symptoms of psychosis (AD+P) and/or affective disturbance (depression, anxiety, and/or irritability, AD+A). This study's goal was to identify the genetic architecture of AD+P and AD+A, as well as their genetically correlated phenotypes.</p> </section> <section> <h3> METHODS</h3> <p>Genome-wide association meta-analysis of 9988 AD participants from six source studies with participants characterized for AD+P AD+A, and a joint phenotype (AD+A+P).</p> </section> <section> <h3> RESULTS</h3> <p>AD+P and AD+A were genetically correlated. However, AD+P and AD+A diverged in their genetic correlations with psychiatric phenotypes in individuals without AD. AD+P was negatively genetically correlated with bipolar disorder and positively with depressive symptoms. AD+A was positively correlated with anxiety disorder and more strongly correlated than AD+P with depressive symptoms. AD+P and AD+A+P had significant estimated heritability, whereas AD+A did not. Examination of the loci most strongly associated with the three phenotypes revealed overlapping and unique associations.</p> </section> <section> <h3> DISCUSSION</h3> <p>AD+P, AD+A, and AD+A+P have both shared and divergent genetic associations pointing to the importance of incorporating genetic insights into future treatment development.</p> </section> <section> <h3> Highlights</h3> <div> <ul> <li>It has long been known that psychotic and affective symptoms are often comorbid in individuals diagnosed with Alzheimer's disease. Here we examined for the first time the genetic architecture underlying this clinical observation, determining that psychotic and affective phenotypes in Alzheimer's disease are genetically correlated.</li> <li>Nevertheless, psychotic and affective phenotypes in Alzheimer's disease diverged in their genetic correlations with psychiatric phenotypes assessed in individuals without Alzheimer's disease. Psychosis in Alzheimer's disease was negatively genetically correlated with bipolar disorder and positively with depressive symptoms, whereas the affective phenotypes in Alzheimer's disease were positively correlated with anxiety disorder and more strongly correlated than psychosis with depressive symptoms.</li> <li>Psychosis in A
导言:阿尔茨海默病(AD)患者通常会出现精神病(AD+P)和/或情感障碍(抑郁、焦虑和/或易怒,AD+A)等神经精神症状。本研究的目标是确定AD+P和AD+A的遗传结构及其与遗传相关的表型:全基因组关联荟萃分析了来自六项研究的9988名AD参与者,这些参与者的特征为AD+P AD+A以及联合表型(AD+A+P):结果:AD+P和AD+A在遗传上相关。然而,AD+P 和 AD+A 与无 AD 患者精神表型的遗传相关性存在差异。AD+P与双相情感障碍呈负遗传相关,与抑郁症状呈正相关。AD+A与焦虑症呈正相关,与抑郁症状的相关性比AD+P更强。AD+P和AD+A+P具有显著的估计遗传率,而AD+A则没有。对与这三种表型最密切相关的基因位点进行的研究发现了重叠和独特的关联:讨论:AD+P、AD+A和AD+A+P既有共同的遗传关联,也有不同的遗传关联,这表明将遗传学见解纳入未来治疗发展的重要性:众所周知,被诊断为阿尔茨海默病的患者通常合并有精神病和情感症状。在这里,我们首次研究了这一临床观察结果背后的遗传结构,确定阿尔茨海默病的精神病和情感表型与遗传相关。然而,阿尔茨海默病的精神病和情感表型与未患阿尔茨海默病的个体所评估的精神病表型在遗传相关性方面存在差异。阿尔茨海默病的精神病与双相情感障碍呈负遗传相关,与抑郁症状呈正遗传相关,而阿尔茨海默病的情感表型与焦虑症呈正相关,比精神病与抑郁症状的相关性更强。对与精神病、情感或联合表型最密切相关的基因位点进行研究,发现了重叠和独特的关联。
{"title":"Genetic associations with psychosis and affective disturbance in Alzheimer's disease","authors":"Inga Margret Antonsdottir,&nbsp;Byron Creese,&nbsp;Lambertus Klei,&nbsp;Mary Ann A. DeMichele-Sweet,&nbsp;Elise A. Weamer,&nbsp;Pablo Garcia-Gonzalez,&nbsp;Marta Marquie,&nbsp;Mercè Boada,&nbsp;Emilio Alarcón-Martín,&nbsp;Sergi Valero,&nbsp;NIA-LOAD Family Based Study Consortium, Alzheimer's Disease Genetics Consortium (ADGC), AddNeuroMed Consortium,&nbsp;Yushi Liu,&nbsp;Basavaraj Hooli,&nbsp;Dag Aarsland,&nbsp;Geir Selbaek,&nbsp;Sverre Bergh,&nbsp;Arvid Rongve,&nbsp;Ingvild Saltvedt,&nbsp;Håvard K. Skjellegrind,&nbsp;Bo Engdahl,&nbsp;Ole A. Andreassen,&nbsp;Barbara Borroni,&nbsp;Patrizia Mecocci,&nbsp;Yehani Wedatilake,&nbsp;Richard Mayeux,&nbsp;Tatiana Foroud,&nbsp;Agustín Ruiz,&nbsp;Oscar L. Lopez,&nbsp;M. Ilyas Kamboh,&nbsp;Clive Ballard,&nbsp;Bernie Devlin,&nbsp;Constantine Lyketsos,&nbsp;Robert A. Sweet","doi":"10.1002/trc2.12472","DOIUrl":"10.1002/trc2.12472","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;div&gt;\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 &lt;section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;h3&gt; INTRODUCTION&lt;/h3&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;p&gt;Individuals with Alzheimer's disease (AD) commonly experience neuropsychiatric symptoms of psychosis (AD+P) and/or affective disturbance (depression, anxiety, and/or irritability, AD+A). This study's goal was to identify the genetic architecture of AD+P and AD+A, as well as their genetically correlated phenotypes.&lt;/p&gt;\u0000 &lt;/section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;h3&gt; METHODS&lt;/h3&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;p&gt;Genome-wide association meta-analysis of 9988 AD participants from six source studies with participants characterized for AD+P AD+A, and a joint phenotype (AD+A+P).&lt;/p&gt;\u0000 &lt;/section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;h3&gt; RESULTS&lt;/h3&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;p&gt;AD+P and AD+A were genetically correlated. However, AD+P and AD+A diverged in their genetic correlations with psychiatric phenotypes in individuals without AD. AD+P was negatively genetically correlated with bipolar disorder and positively with depressive symptoms. AD+A was positively correlated with anxiety disorder and more strongly correlated than AD+P with depressive symptoms. AD+P and AD+A+P had significant estimated heritability, whereas AD+A did not. Examination of the loci most strongly associated with the three phenotypes revealed overlapping and unique associations.&lt;/p&gt;\u0000 &lt;/section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;h3&gt; DISCUSSION&lt;/h3&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;p&gt;AD+P, AD+A, and AD+A+P have both shared and divergent genetic associations pointing to the importance of incorporating genetic insights into future treatment development.&lt;/p&gt;\u0000 &lt;/section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;h3&gt; Highlights&lt;/h3&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;div&gt;\u0000 &lt;ul&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;li&gt;It has long been known that psychotic and affective symptoms are often comorbid in individuals diagnosed with Alzheimer's disease. Here we examined for the first time the genetic architecture underlying this clinical observation, determining that psychotic and affective phenotypes in Alzheimer's disease are genetically correlated.&lt;/li&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;li&gt;Nevertheless, psychotic and affective phenotypes in Alzheimer's disease diverged in their genetic correlations with psychiatric phenotypes assessed in individuals without Alzheimer's disease. Psychosis in Alzheimer's disease was negatively genetically correlated with bipolar disorder and positively with depressive symptoms, whereas the affective phenotypes in Alzheimer's disease were positively correlated with anxiety disorder and more strongly correlated than psychosis with depressive symptoms.&lt;/li&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;li&gt;Psychosis in A","PeriodicalId":53225,"journal":{"name":"Alzheimer''s and Dementia: Translational Research and Clinical Interventions","volume":"10 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.8,"publicationDate":"2024-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11114588/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141089138","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Alzheimer''s and Dementia: Translational Research and Clinical Interventions
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1