首页 > 最新文献

Bladder Cancer最新文献

英文 中文
Comparative Analysis of Very Reduced vs Full Dose BCG Treatment for High-Risk Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer: A Contemporary Experience from Chile 非常减剂量与全剂量卡介苗治疗高危非肌肉浸润性膀胱癌的比较分析:来自智利的当代经验
IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q4 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2023-11-17 DOI: 10.3233/blc-230047
Valentina Grajales, Roberto Contieri, Wei Shen Tan, Marta Flores, Marcela Schultz, Rodrigo Pinochet, Alberto Bustamante, Ashish M. Kamat, Mario I. Fernández

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

Adjuvant bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) is recommended for high-risk (HR) non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC), but BCG shortages have led to exploration of reduced-dose regimens and shortened maintenance durations out of necessity, with limited data on treatment efficacy in Latin America.

OBJECTIVE:

Oncological outcomes of HR-NMIBC patients treated with reduced (RD,1/4th dose) vs full dose (FD) BCG instillations of Danish Strain 1331 BCG.

METHODS:

We performed a retrospective study of HR-NMIBC patients treated with BCG between 2003 and 2022 at our center in Santiago Chile. We stratified patients according to either RD (1/4th dose) or FD BCG. Univariate and multivariable Cox regression models were used to predict recurrence. Kaplan-Meier method was used to calculate survival estimates.

RESULTS:

Of a total of 200 patients, 116 (58%) had RD and 84 (42%) FD BCG. Median follow-up was 57 months (IQR: 29–100). Patients who received FD BCG had a lower risk of recurrence (HR: 0.41, 95% CI 0.22–0.74) and high-grade (HG)-recurrence (HR: 0.30, 95% CI 0.15–0.61; p = 0.001). More patients in the RD vs FD group progressed to MIBC (10/84 vs 2/116; p = 0.18). Additionally, patients were less likely to stop BCG treatment in the RD group compared to the FD group due to toxicity (5% vs 11%, p = 0.14).

CONCLUSIONS:

A 1/4th dose of Danish Strain 1331 BCG treatment was associated with worse recurrence free rate and HG-recurrence rate in our cohort. Patients with RD had lower discontinuation treatment rates due to a reduced toxicity profile. These findings would suggest that RD BCG would compromise oncological outcomes in HR-NMIBC patients.

背景:佐剂卡介苗(BCG)被推荐用于高风险(HR)非肌肉浸润性膀胱癌(NMIBC),但由于卡介苗的短缺,不得不探索减少剂量的方案和缩短维持时间,在拉丁美洲的治疗效果数据有限。目的:减少(RD,1/4剂量)与全剂量(FD)灌注丹麦株1331卡介苗治疗HR-NMIBC患者的肿瘤预后。方法:我们在智利圣地亚哥的中心对2003年至2022年间接受卡介苗治疗的HR-NMIBC患者进行了回顾性研究。我们根据RD(1/4剂量)或FD BCG对患者进行分层。单变量和多变量Cox回归模型用于预测复发率。采用Kaplan-Meier法计算生存估计。结果:在总共200例患者中,116例(58%)患有RD, 84例(42%)患有FD BCG。中位随访57个月(IQR: 29-100)。接受FD卡介苗的患者有较低的复发风险(HR: 0.41, 95% CI 0.22-0.74)和高级别(HG)复发风险(HR: 0.30, 95% CI 0.15-0.61;p = 0.001)。RD组与FD组中更多的患者进展为MIBC (10/84 vs 2/116;p = 0.18)。此外,与FD组相比,RD组患者由于毒性而停止BCG治疗的可能性更小(5% vs 11%, p = 0.14)。结论:在我们的队列中,1/4剂量的丹麦1331株卡介苗治疗与较差的无复发率和hg复发率相关。由于毒性降低,RD患者的停药率较低。这些发现表明RD卡介苗会损害HR-NMIBC患者的肿瘤预后。
{"title":"Comparative Analysis of Very Reduced vs Full Dose BCG Treatment for High-Risk Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer: A Contemporary Experience from Chile","authors":"Valentina Grajales, Roberto Contieri, Wei Shen Tan, Marta Flores, Marcela Schultz, Rodrigo Pinochet, Alberto Bustamante, Ashish M. Kamat, Mario I. Fernández","doi":"10.3233/blc-230047","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3233/blc-230047","url":null,"abstract":"<h4><span>Abstract</span></h4><h3><span></span>BACKGROUND:</h3><p>Adjuvant bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) is recommended for high-risk (HR) non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC), but BCG shortages have led to exploration of reduced-dose regimens and shortened maintenance durations out of necessity, with limited data on treatment efficacy in Latin America.</p><h3><span></span>OBJECTIVE:</h3><p>Oncological outcomes of HR-NMIBC patients treated with reduced (RD,1/4th dose) vs full dose (FD) BCG instillations of <i>Danish Strain</i> 1331 BCG.</p><h3><span></span>METHODS:</h3><p>We performed a retrospective study of HR-NMIBC patients treated with BCG between 2003 and 2022 at our center in Santiago Chile. We stratified patients according to either RD (1/4th dose) or FD BCG. Univariate and multivariable Cox regression models were used to predict recurrence. Kaplan-Meier method was used to calculate survival estimates.</p><h3><span></span>RESULTS:</h3><p>Of a total of 200 patients, 116 (58%) had RD and 84 (42%) FD BCG. Median follow-up was 57 months (IQR: 29–100). Patients who received FD BCG had a lower risk of recurrence (HR: 0.41, 95% CI 0.22–0.74) and high-grade (HG)-recurrence (HR: 0.30, 95% CI 0.15–0.61; <i>p</i> = 0.001). More patients in the RD vs FD group progressed to MIBC (10/84 vs 2/116; <i>p</i> = 0.18). Additionally, patients were less likely to stop BCG treatment in the RD group compared to the FD group due to toxicity (5% vs 11%, <i>p</i> = 0.14).</p><h3><span></span>CONCLUSIONS:</h3><p>A 1/4th dose of <i>Danish Strain</i> 1331 BCG treatment was associated with worse recurrence free rate and HG-recurrence rate in our cohort. Patients with RD had lower discontinuation treatment rates due to a reduced toxicity profile. These findings would suggest that RD BCG would compromise oncological outcomes in HR-NMIBC patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":54217,"journal":{"name":"Bladder Cancer","volume":"14 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2023-11-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138508171","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Molecular Basis of Tumorigenesis of Bladder Cancer and Emerging Concepts in Developing Therapeutic Targets 膀胱癌发生的分子基础和治疗靶点的新概念
IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q4 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2023-11-16 DOI: 10.3233/blc-230025
Rana M. Abdeltwab, Elaria Yacoub, Ahmed H. Rashad, Kyrillus S. Shohdy

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

Advanced urothelial carcinoma (UC) is an aggressive disease whose mutagenic processes are yet to be elucidated. Targeted therapies are urgently needed, but the road from bench to bedside is slowly progressing. In this review, we discuss urothelial carcinoma etiology, along with the most recent advances in UC candidate targeted therapies.

METHODOLOGY:

A comprehensive database search was performed. We aimed to review the most recent updates on UC genomics and targeted therapies. Pre-clinical as well as clinical studies were included.

RESULTS:

Our review highlights the advances in understanding the molecular basis of urothelial tumorigenesis, including smoking, chemical parasitic carcinogens, inheritance, and APOBEC3 editing enzymes. We discussed how these factors contributed to the current mutational landscape of UC. Therapeutic options for UC are still very limited. However, several promising therapeutic approaches are in development to leverage our knowledge of molecular targets, such as targeting fibroblast growth factor receptors (FGFR), DNA damage repair pathways, and HER2.

CONCLUSIONS:

Blindly testing targeted therapies based on other cancer data is not sufficient. UC-specific biomarkers are needed to precisely use the appropriate drug for the appropriate population. More efforts to understand UC biology and evolution are urgently needed.

摘要背景:晚期尿路上皮癌(UC)是一种侵袭性疾病,其致突变过程尚未阐明。我们迫切需要靶向治疗,但从实验到临床的道路进展缓慢。在这篇综述中,我们讨论了尿路上皮癌的病因学,以及UC候选靶向治疗的最新进展。方法:进行全面的数据库检索。我们旨在回顾UC基因组学和靶向治疗的最新进展。包括临床前和临床研究。结果:我们的综述强调了在了解尿路上皮肿瘤发生的分子基础方面的进展,包括吸烟、化学寄生致癌物、遗传和APOBEC3编辑酶。我们讨论了这些因素如何促成UC当前的突变景观。UC的治疗选择仍然非常有限。然而,利用我们对分子靶点的了解,一些有希望的治疗方法正在开发中,例如靶向成纤维细胞生长因子受体(FGFR)、DNA损伤修复途径和HER2。结论:基于其他癌症数据盲目地测试靶向治疗是不够的。需要uc特异性生物标志物来精确地为适当的人群使用适当的药物。迫切需要更多的努力来了解UC生物学和进化。
{"title":"Molecular Basis of Tumorigenesis of Bladder Cancer and Emerging Concepts in Developing Therapeutic Targets","authors":"Rana M. Abdeltwab, Elaria Yacoub, Ahmed H. Rashad, Kyrillus S. Shohdy","doi":"10.3233/blc-230025","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3233/blc-230025","url":null,"abstract":"<h4><span>Abstract</span></h4><h3><span></span>BACKGROUND:</h3><p>Advanced urothelial carcinoma (UC) is an aggressive disease whose mutagenic processes are yet to be elucidated. Targeted therapies are urgently needed, but the road from bench to bedside is slowly progressing. In this review, we discuss urothelial carcinoma etiology, along with the most recent advances in UC candidate targeted therapies.</p><h3><span></span>METHODOLOGY:</h3><p>A comprehensive database search was performed. We aimed to review the most recent updates on UC genomics and targeted therapies. Pre-clinical as well as clinical studies were included.</p><h3><span></span>RESULTS:</h3><p>Our review highlights the advances in understanding the molecular basis of urothelial tumorigenesis, including smoking, chemical parasitic carcinogens, inheritance, and APOBEC3 editing enzymes. We discussed how these factors contributed to the current mutational landscape of UC. Therapeutic options for UC are still very limited. However, several promising therapeutic approaches are in development to leverage our knowledge of molecular targets, such as targeting fibroblast growth factor receptors (FGFR), DNA damage repair pathways, and HER2.</p><h3><span></span>CONCLUSIONS:</h3><p>Blindly testing targeted therapies based on other cancer data is not sufficient. UC-specific biomarkers are needed to precisely use the appropriate drug for the appropriate population. More efforts to understand UC biology and evolution are urgently needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":54217,"journal":{"name":"Bladder Cancer","volume":"13 8 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2023-11-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138531798","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
What is a Bladder Cancer Molecular Subtype? – Counterpoint 什么是膀胱癌分子亚型?——对位
IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q4 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2023-11-10 DOI: 10.3233/blc-230059
François Radvanyi, Francisco X. Real, David McConkey

Abstract

In an accompanying paper, Mattias Hoglund discusses on what is a bladder cancer molecular subtype. He emphasizes the need to consider the aim of tumor classification, which is obviously critical to the approach. He also focuses on considering primarily the identity features of the neoplastic cells. Here, we provide a counterpoint. While largely agreeing with his views, we underline that other parameters that may vary in a spatial or temporal scale, and the tumor microenvironment, can also provide relevant information to render tumor classifications clinically useful. Furthermore, tumor heterogeneity and evolution during the disease course - natural or under therapeutic pressure - should be considered.

在一篇相关论文中,Mattias Hoglund讨论了什么是膀胱癌分子亚型。他强调需要考虑肿瘤分类的目的,这显然对该方法至关重要。他还着重考虑肿瘤细胞的主要特征。在这里,我们提供了一个对应物。虽然在很大程度上同意他的观点,但我们强调,其他可能在空间或时间尺度上变化的参数,以及肿瘤微环境,也可以提供相关信息,使肿瘤分类在临床上有用。此外,肿瘤的异质性和疾病过程中的演变-自然或在治疗压力下-应考虑。
{"title":"What is a Bladder Cancer Molecular Subtype? – Counterpoint","authors":"François Radvanyi, Francisco X. Real, David McConkey","doi":"10.3233/blc-230059","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3233/blc-230059","url":null,"abstract":"<h4><span>Abstract</span></h4><p>In an accompanying paper, Mattias Hoglund discusses on what is a bladder cancer molecular subtype. He emphasizes the need to consider the aim of tumor classification, which is obviously critical to the approach. He also focuses on considering primarily the identity features of the neoplastic cells. Here, we provide a counterpoint. While largely agreeing with his views, we underline that other parameters that may vary in a spatial or temporal scale, and the tumor microenvironment, can also provide relevant information to render tumor classifications clinically useful. Furthermore, tumor heterogeneity and evolution during the disease course - natural or under therapeutic pressure - should be considered.</p>","PeriodicalId":54217,"journal":{"name":"Bladder Cancer","volume":"45 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2023-11-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138508186","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Commentary on Novitas LCD Novitas LCD评论
4区 医学 Q4 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2023-09-28 DOI: 10.3233/blc-230057
Yair Lotan, Daniel A. Barocas, Sam S. Chang, Siamak Daneshmand, Badrinath Konety, Joshua J. Meeks, Sima Porten, Jay D. Raman, Charles J. Rosser, Kristen R. Scarpato, Wade J. Sexton, John P. Sfakianos, Neal D. Shore, Robert S. Svatek
The role of biomarkers (aka, markers) in detecting and managing cancer is an evolving field. It is crucial to develop biomarkers robustly that mirror drug development in the pharmaceutical
{"title":"Commentary on Novitas LCD","authors":"Yair Lotan, Daniel A. Barocas, Sam S. Chang, Siamak Daneshmand, Badrinath Konety, Joshua J. Meeks, Sima Porten, Jay D. Raman, Charles J. Rosser, Kristen R. Scarpato, Wade J. Sexton, John P. Sfakianos, Neal D. Shore, Robert S. Svatek","doi":"10.3233/blc-230057","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3233/blc-230057","url":null,"abstract":"The role of biomarkers (aka, markers) in detecting and managing cancer is an evolving field. It is crucial to develop biomarkers robustly that mirror drug development in the pharmaceutical","PeriodicalId":54217,"journal":{"name":"Bladder Cancer","volume":"57 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135424913","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Advancing Clinical Trial Design for Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer 推进非肌肉浸润性膀胱癌的临床试验设计
4区 医学 Q4 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2023-09-25 DOI: 10.3233/blc-230056
Elaine Chang, Noah M. Hahn, Seth P. Lerner, Jaleh Fallah, Sundeep Agrawal, Ashish M. Kamat, Vishal Bhatnagar, Robert S. Svatek, Adnan A. Jaigirdar, Peter Bross, Neal Shore, Max Kates, Karen Sachse, Jamie R. Brewer, Michael A. O’Donnell, Gary D. Steinberg, Charles J. Viviano, Erik Bloomquist, Maria J. Ribal, Matthew D. Galsky, Richard Oliver, Peter C. Black, Hikmat Al-Ahmadie, Kenneth Brothers, Kamal Pohar, Colin P. Dinney, Zhou Feng, Tracy M. Downs, Sima P. Porten, Angela B. Smith, Rick Bangs, Sarah P. Psutka, Neeraj Agarwal, Laleh Amiri-Kordestani, Daniel L. Suzman, Richard Pazdur, Paul G. Kluetz, Chana Weinstock
BACKGROUND: Despite recent drug development for non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC), few therapies have been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA), and there remains an unmet clinical need. Bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG) supply issues underscore the importance of developing safe and effective drugs for NMIBC. OBJECTIVE: On November 18–19, 2021, the FDA held a public virtual workshop to discuss NMIBC research needs and potential trial designs for future development of effective therapies. METHODS: Representatives from various disciplines including urologists, oncologists, pathologists, statisticians, basic and translational scientists, and the patient advocacy community participated. The workshop format included invited lectures, panel discussions, and opportunity for audience discussion and comment. RESULTS: In a pre-workshop survey, 92% of urologists surveyed considered the development of alternatives to BCG as a high drug development priority for BCG-naïve high-risk patients. Key topics discussed included definitions of disease states; trial design for BCG-naïve NMIBC, BCG-unresponsive carcinoma in situ, and BCG-unresponsive papillary carcinoma; strengths and limitations of single-arm trial designs; assessing patient-reported outcomes; and considerations for assessing avoidance of cystectomy as an efficacy measure. CONCLUSIONS: The workshop discussed several important opportunities for trial design refinement in NMIBC. FDA encourages sponsors to meet with the appropriate review division to discuss trial design proposals for NMIBC early in drug development.
背景:尽管最近开发了治疗非肌肉浸润性膀胱癌(NMIBC)的药物,但美国食品和药物管理局(FDA)批准的治疗方法很少,临床需求仍未得到满足。卡介苗(BCG)的供应问题强调了开发安全有效的NMIBC药物的重要性。目的:2021年11月18日至19日,FDA举行了一次公共虚拟研讨会,讨论NMIBC研究需求和未来开发有效疗法的潜在试验设计。方法:来自不同学科的代表,包括泌尿科医生、肿瘤科医生、病理学家、统计学家、基础和转化科学家以及患者倡导团体的代表参加了本次会议。研讨会的形式包括邀请讲座、小组讨论以及听众讨论和评论的机会。结果:在研讨会前的调查中,92%的受访泌尿科医生认为开发卡介苗的替代品是BCG-naïve高危患者药物开发的优先事项。讨论的主要议题包括疾病状态的定义;BCG-naïve NMIBC、bcg无反应原位癌和bcg无反应乳头状癌的试验设计;单臂试验设计的优势和局限性;评估患者报告的结果;以及评估避免膀胱切除术作为疗效措施的考虑。结论:研讨会讨论了改进NMIBC试验设计的几个重要机会。FDA鼓励申办者在药物开发早期与适当的审查部门会面,讨论NMIBC的试验设计建议。
{"title":"Advancing Clinical Trial Design for Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer","authors":"Elaine Chang, Noah M. Hahn, Seth P. Lerner, Jaleh Fallah, Sundeep Agrawal, Ashish M. Kamat, Vishal Bhatnagar, Robert S. Svatek, Adnan A. Jaigirdar, Peter Bross, Neal Shore, Max Kates, Karen Sachse, Jamie R. Brewer, Michael A. O’Donnell, Gary D. Steinberg, Charles J. Viviano, Erik Bloomquist, Maria J. Ribal, Matthew D. Galsky, Richard Oliver, Peter C. Black, Hikmat Al-Ahmadie, Kenneth Brothers, Kamal Pohar, Colin P. Dinney, Zhou Feng, Tracy M. Downs, Sima P. Porten, Angela B. Smith, Rick Bangs, Sarah P. Psutka, Neeraj Agarwal, Laleh Amiri-Kordestani, Daniel L. Suzman, Richard Pazdur, Paul G. Kluetz, Chana Weinstock","doi":"10.3233/blc-230056","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3233/blc-230056","url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND: Despite recent drug development for non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC), few therapies have been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA), and there remains an unmet clinical need. Bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG) supply issues underscore the importance of developing safe and effective drugs for NMIBC. OBJECTIVE: On November 18–19, 2021, the FDA held a public virtual workshop to discuss NMIBC research needs and potential trial designs for future development of effective therapies. METHODS: Representatives from various disciplines including urologists, oncologists, pathologists, statisticians, basic and translational scientists, and the patient advocacy community participated. The workshop format included invited lectures, panel discussions, and opportunity for audience discussion and comment. RESULTS: In a pre-workshop survey, 92% of urologists surveyed considered the development of alternatives to BCG as a high drug development priority for BCG-naïve high-risk patients. Key topics discussed included definitions of disease states; trial design for BCG-naïve NMIBC, BCG-unresponsive carcinoma in situ, and BCG-unresponsive papillary carcinoma; strengths and limitations of single-arm trial designs; assessing patient-reported outcomes; and considerations for assessing avoidance of cystectomy as an efficacy measure. CONCLUSIONS: The workshop discussed several important opportunities for trial design refinement in NMIBC. FDA encourages sponsors to meet with the appropriate review division to discuss trial design proposals for NMIBC early in drug development.","PeriodicalId":54217,"journal":{"name":"Bladder Cancer","volume":"40 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135769451","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Impact of Adjuvant Gemcitabine Containing Chemotherapy Following Radical Nephroureterectomy for Patients with Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: Results from a Propensity-Score Matched Cohort Study 上路尿路上皮癌根治性肾输尿管切除术后辅助化疗吉西他滨的影响:来自倾向评分匹配队列研究的结果
4区 医学 Q4 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2023-09-25 DOI: 10.3233/blc-230041
Zhao Hongda, Liu Kang, Chi-Fai Ng, Jean de la Rosette, Pilar Laguna, Paolo Gontero, Joyce Baard, Ozcan Yildiz, Jeremy Yuen-Chun Teoh
BACKGROUND: The evidence regarding perioperative adjuvant chemotherapy and personalized surveillance strategies for upper tract urothelial carcinoma is limited. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether adjuvant gemcitabine containing chemotherapy affects the oncological outcomes of advanced upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). METHODS: The CROES-UTUC registry is an observational, international, multi-center study on patients diagnosed with UTUC. Patient and disease characteristics from 2380 patients with UTUC were collected, and finally 738 patients were included in this analysis. The primary outcome of this study was recurrence-free survival. Propensity score matching was performed. Kaplan-Meier and multivariate Cox regression analyses were performed by stratifying patients according to the treatment of adjuvant chemotherapy. RESULTS: A total of 738 patients were included in this analysis, and 59 patients received adjuvant chemotherapy (AC), including 50 patients who received gemcitabine. A propensity score matching was performed, including 50 patients who received gemcitabine containing treatment and 50 patients without adjuvant chemotherapy. Disease recurrence occurred in 34.0% of patients. The recurrence rate in the AC group was 22.0%, which was significantly lower than the non-AC group (46.0%). Kaplan-Meier analyses also showed that AC was associated with a lower likelihood of tumor recurrence (p = 0.047). However, AC was not significantly associated with a higher overall survival (OS) (p = 0.908) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) (p = 0.979). Upon multivariate Cox regression analysis, AC was associated with a lower risk of tumor recurrence (HR = 0.297, p = 0.028). CONCLUSION: The present study confirms that adjuvant gemcitabine containing chemotherapy could decrease the risk of tumor recurrence in patients with locally advanced UTUC following nephroureterectomy. However, more studies are need to draw a clearer image of the value of this treatment method.
背景:关于上尿路上皮癌围手术期辅助化疗和个性化监测策略的证据有限。目的:评价吉西他滨辅助化疗是否会影响晚期上尿路上皮癌(UTUC)的肿瘤预后。方法:CROES-UTUC注册是一项针对诊断为UTUC的患者的观察性、国际性、多中心研究。收集了2380例UTUC患者的患者和疾病特征,最终将738例患者纳入本分析。这项研究的主要终点是无复发生存期。进行倾向评分匹配。根据辅助化疗的治疗方式对患者进行分层,进行Kaplan-Meier和多变量Cox回归分析。结果:本分析共纳入738例患者,59例患者接受了辅助化疗(AC),其中50例患者接受了吉西他滨。进行倾向评分匹配,包括50名接受吉西他滨治疗的患者和50名未接受辅助化疗的患者。34.0%的患者出现疾病复发。AC组复发率为22.0%,明显低于非AC组(46.0%)。Kaplan-Meier分析还显示,AC与较低的肿瘤复发率相关(p = 0.047)。然而,AC与更高的总生存期(OS) (p = 0.908)和癌症特异性生存期(CSS) (p = 0.979)没有显著相关。多因素Cox回归分析显示,AC与较低的肿瘤复发风险相关(HR = 0.297, p = 0.028)。结论:本研究证实吉西他滨辅助化疗可降低局部晚期UTUC肾输尿管切除术后肿瘤复发的风险。然而,需要更多的研究来更清楚地了解这种治疗方法的价值。
{"title":"Impact of Adjuvant Gemcitabine Containing Chemotherapy Following Radical Nephroureterectomy for Patients with Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: Results from a Propensity-Score Matched Cohort Study","authors":"Zhao Hongda, Liu Kang, Chi-Fai Ng, Jean de la Rosette, Pilar Laguna, Paolo Gontero, Joyce Baard, Ozcan Yildiz, Jeremy Yuen-Chun Teoh","doi":"10.3233/blc-230041","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3233/blc-230041","url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND: The evidence regarding perioperative adjuvant chemotherapy and personalized surveillance strategies for upper tract urothelial carcinoma is limited. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether adjuvant gemcitabine containing chemotherapy affects the oncological outcomes of advanced upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). METHODS: The CROES-UTUC registry is an observational, international, multi-center study on patients diagnosed with UTUC. Patient and disease characteristics from 2380 patients with UTUC were collected, and finally 738 patients were included in this analysis. The primary outcome of this study was recurrence-free survival. Propensity score matching was performed. Kaplan-Meier and multivariate Cox regression analyses were performed by stratifying patients according to the treatment of adjuvant chemotherapy. RESULTS: A total of 738 patients were included in this analysis, and 59 patients received adjuvant chemotherapy (AC), including 50 patients who received gemcitabine. A propensity score matching was performed, including 50 patients who received gemcitabine containing treatment and 50 patients without adjuvant chemotherapy. Disease recurrence occurred in 34.0% of patients. The recurrence rate in the AC group was 22.0%, which was significantly lower than the non-AC group (46.0%). Kaplan-Meier analyses also showed that AC was associated with a lower likelihood of tumor recurrence (p = 0.047). However, AC was not significantly associated with a higher overall survival (OS) (p = 0.908) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) (p = 0.979). Upon multivariate Cox regression analysis, AC was associated with a lower risk of tumor recurrence (HR = 0.297, p = 0.028). CONCLUSION: The present study confirms that adjuvant gemcitabine containing chemotherapy could decrease the risk of tumor recurrence in patients with locally advanced UTUC following nephroureterectomy. However, more studies are need to draw a clearer image of the value of this treatment method.","PeriodicalId":54217,"journal":{"name":"Bladder Cancer","volume":"40 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135769129","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Comparison of Robotic vs Open Cystectomy: A Systematic Review 机器人与开放式膀胱切除术的比较:系统综述
4区 医学 Q4 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2023-09-25 DOI: 10.3233/blc-220065
Niranjan J. Sathianathen, Henry Y.C. Pan, Marc Furrer, Benjamin Thomas, Philip Dundee, Niall Corcoran, Christopher J. Weight, Badrinath Konety, Rajesh Nair, Nathan Lawrentschuk
BACKGROUND: The benefits of a robot-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC) compared to an open approach is still under debate. Initial data on RARC were from trials where urinary diversion was performed by an extracorporeal approach, which does not represent a completely minimally invasive procedure. There are now updated data for RARC with intracorporeal urinary diversion that add to the evidence profile of RARC. OBJECTIVE: To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of the effectiveness of RARC compared with open radical cystectomy (ORC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Multiple databases were searched up to May 2022. We included randomised trials in which patients underwent RARC and ORC. Oncological and safety outcomes were assessed. RESULTS: Seven trials of 907 participants were included. There were no differences seen in primary outcomes: disease progression [RR 0.98, 95% CI 0.78 to 1.23], major complications [RR 0.95, 95% CI 0.72 to 1.24] and quality of life [SMD 0.05, 95% CI -0.13 to 0.38]. RARC resulted in a decreased risk of perioperative blood transfusion [RR 0.57, 95% CI 0.43 to 0.76], wound complications [RR 0.34, 95% CI 0.21 to 0.55] and reduced length of hospital stay [MD -0.62 days, 95% CI -1.11 to -0.13]. However, there was an increased risk of developing a ureteric stricture [RR 4.21, 95% CI 1.07 to 16.53] in the RARC group and a prolonged operative time [MD 70.4 minutes, 95% CI 34.1 to 106.7]. The approach for urinary diversion did not impact outcomes. CONCLUSION: RARC is an oncologically safe procedure compared to ORC and provides the benefits of a minimally invasive approach. There was an increased risk of developing a ureteric stricture in patients undergoing RARC that warrants further investigation. There was no difference in oncological outcomes between approaches.
背景:与开放入路相比,机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术(RARC)的益处仍在争论中。RARC的初始数据来自于通过体外入路进行尿分流的试验,这并不代表完全微创手术。现在有关于RARC伴体内尿转移的最新数据,增加了RARC的证据概况。目的:对RARC与开放式根治性膀胱切除术(ORC)的有效性进行系统评价和荟萃分析。材料与方法:检索截至2022年5月的多个数据库。我们纳入了患者接受RARC和ORC的随机试验。评估肿瘤和安全性结果。结果:共纳入7项试验,共907名受试者。两组的主要结局无差异:疾病进展[RR 0.98, 95% CI 0.78 ~ 1.23]、主要并发症[RR 0.95, 95% CI 0.72 ~ 1.24]和生活质量[SMD 0.05, 95% CI -0.13 ~ 0.38]。RARC导致围手术期输血风险降低[RR 0.57, 95% CI 0.43 ~ 0.76],伤口并发症[RR 0.34, 95% CI 0.21 ~ 0.55],住院时间缩短[MD -0.62天,95% CI -1.11 ~ -0.13]。然而,RARC组发生输尿管狭窄的风险增加[RR 4.21, 95% CI 1.07至16.53],手术时间延长[MD 70.4分钟,95% CI 34.1至106.7]。尿改道的方法对结果没有影响。结论:与ORC相比,RARC是一种肿瘤学上安全的手术,并具有微创手术的优点。接受RARC的患者发生输尿管狭窄的风险增加,值得进一步调查。两种治疗方法的肿瘤预后无差异。
{"title":"Comparison of Robotic vs Open Cystectomy: A Systematic Review","authors":"Niranjan J. Sathianathen, Henry Y.C. Pan, Marc Furrer, Benjamin Thomas, Philip Dundee, Niall Corcoran, Christopher J. Weight, Badrinath Konety, Rajesh Nair, Nathan Lawrentschuk","doi":"10.3233/blc-220065","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3233/blc-220065","url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND: The benefits of a robot-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC) compared to an open approach is still under debate. Initial data on RARC were from trials where urinary diversion was performed by an extracorporeal approach, which does not represent a completely minimally invasive procedure. There are now updated data for RARC with intracorporeal urinary diversion that add to the evidence profile of RARC. OBJECTIVE: To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of the effectiveness of RARC compared with open radical cystectomy (ORC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Multiple databases were searched up to May 2022. We included randomised trials in which patients underwent RARC and ORC. Oncological and safety outcomes were assessed. RESULTS: Seven trials of 907 participants were included. There were no differences seen in primary outcomes: disease progression [RR 0.98, 95% CI 0.78 to 1.23], major complications [RR 0.95, 95% CI 0.72 to 1.24] and quality of life [SMD 0.05, 95% CI -0.13 to 0.38]. RARC resulted in a decreased risk of perioperative blood transfusion [RR 0.57, 95% CI 0.43 to 0.76], wound complications [RR 0.34, 95% CI 0.21 to 0.55] and reduced length of hospital stay [MD -0.62 days, 95% CI -1.11 to -0.13]. However, there was an increased risk of developing a ureteric stricture [RR 4.21, 95% CI 1.07 to 16.53] in the RARC group and a prolonged operative time [MD 70.4 minutes, 95% CI 34.1 to 106.7]. The approach for urinary diversion did not impact outcomes. CONCLUSION: RARC is an oncologically safe procedure compared to ORC and provides the benefits of a minimally invasive approach. There was an increased risk of developing a ureteric stricture in patients undergoing RARC that warrants further investigation. There was no difference in oncological outcomes between approaches.","PeriodicalId":54217,"journal":{"name":"Bladder Cancer","volume":"66 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135769130","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Y Chromosome Loss and Bladder Cancer Y染色体缺失与膀胱癌
4区 医学 Q4 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2023-09-25 DOI: 10.3233/blc-239009
Edward M. Messing
{"title":"Y Chromosome Loss and Bladder Cancer","authors":"Edward M. Messing","doi":"10.3233/blc-239009","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3233/blc-239009","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":54217,"journal":{"name":"Bladder Cancer","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135769452","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Clinical Trials Corner Issue 9(2) 临床试验角第九期(二)
4区 医学 Q4 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2023-06-27 DOI: 10.3233/blc-239007
Piyush K. Agarwal, Cora N. Sternberg
{"title":"Clinical Trials Corner Issue 9(2)","authors":"Piyush K. Agarwal, Cora N. Sternberg","doi":"10.3233/blc-239007","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3233/blc-239007","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":54217,"journal":{"name":"Bladder Cancer","volume":"52 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135399249","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Hypofractionated Radiation Therapy (Hypo-RT) for the Treatment of Localized Bladder Cancer 低分割放疗治疗局限性膀胱癌
4区 医学 Q4 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2023-06-27 DOI: 10.3233/blc-220121
Assaf Moore, Stephanie M Lobaugh, Zhigang Zhang, Jonathan E Rosenberg, Gopa Iyer, Min Yuen Teo, Bernard Bochner, Timothy Donahue, David Aramburu Nunez, Alexandra Dreyfuss, Daniel Gorovets, Michael J Zelefsky, Marisa A. Kollmeier
BACKGROUND: Various radiotherapeutic regimens are used in the treatment of bladder cancer. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to evaluate early toxicity and outcomes associated with hypofractionated radiation therapy (Hypo-RT), 55Gy in 20 fractions. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We identified 40 patients who received definitive Hypo-RT for localized bladder cancer. Most patients were men (62.5%), elderly (median age 82), had high Charlson Comorbidity Index score (median 7, range 4–9) and were nonsurgical candidates (80%). Sixty-eight percent had a macroscopically complete transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURBT) and 33 patients (82.5%) received concurrent chemotherapy. Acute (< =3mo) and late (>3mo) toxicities were assessed according to CTCAE v4.0. Survival outcomes were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Median follow up after Hypo-RT was 32 months (95% CI: 28–49 months). RESULTS: Overall rates of acute grade 2 genitourinary (GU) and gastrointestinal (GI) toxicities were 40% each, most commonly urinary frequency and diarrhea. Two cases of acute grade 3 GU/GI toxicity occurred. Late grade 2+ toxicity occurred in 3 patients (7.5%): 2 grade 2 GU and 1 grade 3 GI. Seventy-seven percent achieved a complete response (CR). Six patients (20%) developed disease recurrence at a median time of 9.1 months. The estimated 2-year DFS and 2-year DSS rate were 59% (95% CI, 45–78%) and 78% (95% CI, 65–93%), respectively. Receipt of concurrent chemotherapy (p = 0.003) and achieving a CR (p = 0.018) were univariably associated with improved DSS. Tis component was associated with worse DSS (p = 0.015). CONCLUSION: Hypo-RT had a favorable toxicity profile and encouraging cancer control outcomes in this mostly elderly and frail patient cohort.
背景:膀胱癌的治疗采用多种放射治疗方案。目的:我们旨在评估低分割放射治疗(hyport)的早期毒性和预后,55Gy分20个部分。材料和方法:我们确定了40例接受明确低放射治疗的局限性膀胱癌患者。大多数患者为男性(62.5%),老年人(中位年龄82岁),Charlson合并症指数评分高(中位7,范围4-9),非手术候选人(80%)。68%的患者接受了经尿道膀胱肿瘤全切除术(turt), 33名患者(82.5%)接受了同期化疗。急性(& lt;=3mo)和晚期(>3mo)毒性根据CTCAE v4.0进行评估。使用Kaplan-Meier法估计生存结果。hyport术后中位随访时间为32个月(95% CI: 28-49个月)。结果:急性2级泌尿生殖系统(GU)和胃肠道(GI)毒性的总发生率各为40%,最常见的是尿频和腹泻。发生急性3级GU/GI毒性2例。3例患者(7.5%)出现2+级晚期毒性:2例2级GU和1例3级GI。77%的患者达到完全缓解(CR)。6例患者(20%)在中位时间9.1个月后出现疾病复发。估计2年DFS和2年DSS率分别为59% (95% CI, 45-78%)和78% (95% CI, 65-93%)。接受同步化疗(p = 0.003)和达到CR (p = 0.018)与改善的DSS呈正相关。该成分与较差的DSS相关(p = 0.015)。结论:在这个主要是老年人和体弱患者的队列中,低放射疗法具有良好的毒性和令人鼓舞的癌症控制结果。
{"title":"Hypofractionated Radiation Therapy (Hypo-RT) for the Treatment of Localized Bladder Cancer","authors":"Assaf Moore, Stephanie M Lobaugh, Zhigang Zhang, Jonathan E Rosenberg, Gopa Iyer, Min Yuen Teo, Bernard Bochner, Timothy Donahue, David Aramburu Nunez, Alexandra Dreyfuss, Daniel Gorovets, Michael J Zelefsky, Marisa A. Kollmeier","doi":"10.3233/blc-220121","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3233/blc-220121","url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND: Various radiotherapeutic regimens are used in the treatment of bladder cancer. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to evaluate early toxicity and outcomes associated with hypofractionated radiation therapy (Hypo-RT), 55Gy in 20 fractions. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We identified 40 patients who received definitive Hypo-RT for localized bladder cancer. Most patients were men (62.5%), elderly (median age 82), had high Charlson Comorbidity Index score (median 7, range 4–9) and were nonsurgical candidates (80%). Sixty-eight percent had a macroscopically complete transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURBT) and 33 patients (82.5%) received concurrent chemotherapy. Acute (< =3mo) and late (>3mo) toxicities were assessed according to CTCAE v4.0. Survival outcomes were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Median follow up after Hypo-RT was 32 months (95% CI: 28–49 months). RESULTS: Overall rates of acute grade 2 genitourinary (GU) and gastrointestinal (GI) toxicities were 40% each, most commonly urinary frequency and diarrhea. Two cases of acute grade 3 GU/GI toxicity occurred. Late grade 2+ toxicity occurred in 3 patients (7.5%): 2 grade 2 GU and 1 grade 3 GI. Seventy-seven percent achieved a complete response (CR). Six patients (20%) developed disease recurrence at a median time of 9.1 months. The estimated 2-year DFS and 2-year DSS rate were 59% (95% CI, 45–78%) and 78% (95% CI, 65–93%), respectively. Receipt of concurrent chemotherapy (p = 0.003) and achieving a CR (p = 0.018) were univariably associated with improved DSS. Tis component was associated with worse DSS (p = 0.015). CONCLUSION: Hypo-RT had a favorable toxicity profile and encouraging cancer control outcomes in this mostly elderly and frail patient cohort.","PeriodicalId":54217,"journal":{"name":"Bladder Cancer","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135399250","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Bladder Cancer
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1