Pub Date : 2021-12-01DOI: 10.1080/13814788.2021.1982889
Dóra Békési, Illés Teker, Péter Torzsa, László Kalabay, Sándor Rózsa, Ajándék Eőry
Background: Responsibility of general practitioners (GPs) in delivering safe and effective care is always high but during the COVID-19 pandemic they face even growing pressure that might result in unbearable stress load (allostatic overload, AO) leading to disease.
Objectives: We aimed to measure AO of Hungarian GPs during the COVID-19 pandemic and explore their recreational resources to identify potential protective factors against stress load.
Methods: In a mixed-method design, Fava's clinimetric approach to AO was applied alongside the Psychosocial Index (PSI); Kellner's symptom questionnaire (SQ) to measure depression, anxiety, hostility and somatisation and the Public Health Surveillance Well-being Scale (PHS-WB) to determine mental, social, and physical well-being. Recreational resources were mapped. Besides Chi-square and Kruskal-Wallis tests, regression analysis was applied to identify explanatory variables of AO.
Results: Data of 228 GPs (68% females) were analysed. Work-related changes caused the biggest challenges leading to AO in 60% of the sample. While female sex (OR: 1.99; CI: 1.06; 3.74, p = 0.032) and other life stresses (OR: 1.4; CI: 1.2; 1.6, p < 0.001) associated with increased odds of AO, each additional day with 30 min for recreation purposes associated with 20% decreased odds (OR: 0.838; CI: 0.72; 0.97, p = 0.020). 3-4 days a week when time was ensured for recreation associated with elevated mental and physical well-being, while 5-7 days associated with lower depressive and anxiety symptoms, somatisation, and hostility.
Conclusion: Under changing circumstances, resilience improvement through increasing time spent on recreation should be emphasised to prevent GPs from the adverse health consequences of stress load.
背景:全科医生在提供安全有效护理方面的责任始终很高,但在2019冠状病毒病大流行期间,他们面临的压力甚至越来越大,可能导致无法承受的压力负荷(适应超负荷,AO),从而导致疾病。目的:我们旨在测量匈牙利全科医生在COVID-19大流行期间的AO,并探索他们的娱乐资源,以确定对应激负荷的潜在保护因素。方法:采用混合方法设计,将Fava的AO临床计量方法与社会心理指数(PSI)一起应用;用Kellner症状问卷(SQ)测量抑郁、焦虑、敌意和躯体化,用公共卫生监测幸福感量表(PHS-WB)测定心理、社会和身体幸福感。绘制了娱乐资源地图。除卡方检验和Kruskal-Wallis检验外,还采用回归分析确定AO的解释变量。结果:对228例全科医生(女性68%)的资料进行分析。在60%的样本中,与工作相关的变化是导致AO的最大挑战。而女性(OR: 1.99;CI: 1.06;3.74, p = 0.032)和其他生活压力(OR: 1.4;CI: 1.2;1.6, p p = 0.020)。每周保证有3-4天的时间用于娱乐,与精神和身体健康有关,而5-7天的时间与较低的抑郁和焦虑症状、躯体化和敌意有关。结论:在不断变化的环境下,应重视通过增加娱乐时间来提高心理弹性,以防止全科医生受到压力负荷的不良健康后果。
{"title":"To prevent being stressed-out: Allostatic overload and resilience of general practitioners in the era of COVID-19. A cross-sectional observational study.","authors":"Dóra Békési, Illés Teker, Péter Torzsa, László Kalabay, Sándor Rózsa, Ajándék Eőry","doi":"10.1080/13814788.2021.1982889","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13814788.2021.1982889","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Responsibility of general practitioners (GPs) in delivering safe and effective care is always high but during the COVID-19 pandemic they face even growing pressure that might result in unbearable stress load (allostatic overload, AO) leading to disease.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We aimed to measure AO of Hungarian GPs during the COVID-19 pandemic and explore their recreational resources to identify potential protective factors against stress load.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In a mixed-method design, Fava's clinimetric approach to AO was applied alongside the Psychosocial Index (PSI); Kellner's symptom questionnaire (SQ) to measure depression, anxiety, hostility and somatisation and the Public Health Surveillance Well-being Scale (PHS-WB) to determine mental, social, and physical well-being. Recreational resources were mapped. Besides Chi-square and Kruskal-Wallis tests, regression analysis was applied to identify explanatory variables of AO.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data of 228 GPs (68% females) were analysed. Work-related changes caused the biggest challenges leading to AO in 60% of the sample. While female sex (OR: 1.99; CI: 1.06; 3.74, <i>p</i> = 0.032) and other life stresses (OR: 1.4; CI: 1.2; 1.6, <i>p</i> < 0.001) associated with increased odds of AO, each additional day with 30 min for recreation purposes associated with 20% decreased odds (OR: 0.838; CI: 0.72; 0.97, <i>p</i> = 0.020). 3-4 days a week when time was ensured for recreation associated with elevated mental and physical well-being, while 5-7 days associated with lower depressive and anxiety symptoms, somatisation, and hostility.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Under changing circumstances, resilience improvement through increasing time spent on recreation should be emphasised to prevent GPs from the adverse health consequences of stress load.</p>","PeriodicalId":54380,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of General Practice","volume":"27 1","pages":"277-285"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8510612/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9569174","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2021-12-01DOI: 10.1080/13814788.2021.1954616
Siew Lian Leong, Siew Li Teoh, Weng Hong Fun, Shaun Wen Huey Lee
Background: Task shifting is an approach to help address the shortage of healthcare workers through reallocating human resources but its impact on primary care is unclear.
Objectives: To provide an overview of reviews describing task shifts from physicians to allied healthcare workers in primary care and its impact on clinical outcomes.
Methods: Six electronic databases were searched up to 15 December 2020, to identify reviews describing task shifting in primary care. Two reviewers independently screened the references for relevant studies, extracted the data and assessed the methodological quality of included reviews using AMSTAR-2.
Results: Twenty-one reviews that described task shifting in primary care were included. Task shifted include provision of care for people with chronic conditions, medication prescribing, and health education. We found that task shifting could potentially improve several health outcomes such as blood pressure, HbA1c, and mental health while achieving cost savings. Key elements for successful implementation of task shifting include collaboration among all parties, a system for coordinated care, provider empowerment, patient preference, shared decision making, training and competency, supportive organisation system, clear process outcome, and financing.
Conclusion: Evidence suggests that allied healthcare workers such as pharmacists and nurses can potentially undertake substantially expanded roles to support physicians in primary care in response to the changing health service demand. Tasks include providing care to patients, independent prescribing, counselling and education, with comparable quality of care.
{"title":"Task shifting in primary care to tackle healthcare worker shortages: An umbrella review.","authors":"Siew Lian Leong, Siew Li Teoh, Weng Hong Fun, Shaun Wen Huey Lee","doi":"10.1080/13814788.2021.1954616","DOIUrl":"10.1080/13814788.2021.1954616","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Task shifting is an approach to help address the shortage of healthcare workers through reallocating human resources but its impact on primary care is unclear.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To provide an overview of reviews describing task shifts from physicians to allied healthcare workers in primary care and its impact on clinical outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Six electronic databases were searched up to 15 December 2020, to identify reviews describing task shifting in primary care. Two reviewers independently screened the references for relevant studies, extracted the data and assessed the methodological quality of included reviews using AMSTAR-2.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-one reviews that described task shifting in primary care were included. Task shifted include provision of care for people with chronic conditions, medication prescribing, and health education. We found that task shifting could potentially improve several health outcomes such as blood pressure, HbA1c, and mental health while achieving cost savings. Key elements for successful implementation of task shifting include collaboration among all parties, a system for coordinated care, provider empowerment, patient preference, shared decision making, training and competency, supportive organisation system, clear process outcome, and financing.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Evidence suggests that allied healthcare workers such as pharmacists and nurses can potentially undertake substantially expanded roles to support physicians in primary care in response to the changing health service demand. Tasks include providing care to patients, independent prescribing, counselling and education, with comparable quality of care.</p>","PeriodicalId":54380,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of General Practice","volume":"27 1","pages":"198-210"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8330741/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9941167","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2021-12-01DOI: 10.1080/13814788.2021.1985455
Maxine D Rouvroye, Pauline Slottje, Tom van Gils, Chris J Mulder, Jean W Muris, Dick Walstock, Marcel Reinders, Gerd Bouma
Background: Coeliac disease (CD) is a highly prevalent (∼1%) disease that allegedly remains undiagnosed in over 80% of the cases because of atypical symptoms or silent disease. Currently, it is unknown how GPs deal with (suspected) CD.
Objectives: This study aimed to better understand the diagnostic approach and the clinical reasoning process of GPs concerning CD and concurrently address diagnostic pitfalls.
Methods: A questionnaire with case vignettes to assess the knowledge, diagnostic reasoning pattern and practice for CD by GPs was developed. It was sent through academic GP research networks (encompassing over 1500 GPs) in two large cities and to smaller practices in rural areas. The questionnaire was composed of seven background questions, 13 questions related to four case vignettes and six additional CD-related questions.
Results: Responses were received from 106 GPs. Knowledge on risk factors for CD and appropriate testing of at-risk populations was limited. Twenty-two percent would diagnose CD in adults exclusively based on serology, without histopathological confirmation. In total, 99% would refer a newly diagnosed patient to a dietitian to initiate a gluten-free diet (GFD). In the absence of symptoms, only 33% would initiate a GFD.
Conclusion: The results of this study have given us insight into the diagnostic process of GPs encountering patient with gluten-related complaints. Multiple serology test is available and used, while a positive serology test is not always followed up by a gastroduodenal biopsy to confirm the diagnosis. Most GPs would refer a symptomatic CD patient to a dietician for a GFD.
{"title":"Insight in the diagnosis and treatment of coeliac disease in general practice: A survey and case vignette study among 106 general practitioners.","authors":"Maxine D Rouvroye, Pauline Slottje, Tom van Gils, Chris J Mulder, Jean W Muris, Dick Walstock, Marcel Reinders, Gerd Bouma","doi":"10.1080/13814788.2021.1985455","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13814788.2021.1985455","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Coeliac disease (CD) is a highly prevalent (∼1%) disease that allegedly remains undiagnosed in over 80% of the cases because of atypical symptoms or silent disease. Currently, it is unknown how GPs deal with (suspected) CD.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to better understand the diagnostic approach and the clinical reasoning process of GPs concerning CD and concurrently address diagnostic pitfalls.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A questionnaire with case vignettes to assess the knowledge, diagnostic reasoning pattern and practice for CD by GPs was developed. It was sent through academic GP research networks (encompassing over 1500 GPs) in two large cities and to smaller practices in rural areas. The questionnaire was composed of seven background questions, 13 questions related to four case vignettes and six additional CD-related questions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Responses were received from 106 GPs. Knowledge on risk factors for CD and appropriate testing of at-risk populations was limited. Twenty-two percent would diagnose CD in adults exclusively based on serology, without histopathological confirmation. In total, 99% would refer a newly diagnosed patient to a dietitian to initiate a gluten-free diet (GFD). In the absence of symptoms, only 33% would initiate a GFD.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results of this study have given us insight into the diagnostic process of GPs encountering patient with gluten-related complaints. Multiple serology test is available and used, while a positive serology test is not always followed up by a gastroduodenal biopsy to confirm the diagnosis. Most GPs would refer a symptomatic CD patient to a dietician for a GFD.</p>","PeriodicalId":54380,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of General Practice","volume":"27 1","pages":"313-319"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8583831/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9572964","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2021-12-01DOI: 10.1080/13814788.2021.1933425
Caroline Krüger, Ingmar Schäfer, Hendrik van den Bussche, Michael Baehr, Horst Bickel, Angela Fuchs, Jochen Gensichen, Wolfgang Maier, Steffi G Riedel-Heller, Hans-Helmut König, Anne Dahlhaus, Gerhard Schön, Siegfried Weyerer, Birgitt Wiese, Wolfgang von Renteln-Kruse, Claudia Langebrake, Martin Scherer
Background: The elderly population deals with multimorbidity (three chronic conditions) and increasinged drug use with age. A comprehensive characterisation of the medication - including prescription and over-the-counter (OTC) drugs - of elderly patients in primary care is still insufficient.
Objectives: This study aims to characterise the medication (prescription and OTC) of multimorbid elderly patients in primary care and living at home by identifying drug patterns to evaluate the relationship between drugs and drug groups and reveal associations with recently published multimorbidity clusters of the same cohort.
Methods: MultiCare was a multicentre, prospective, observational cohort study of 3189 multimorbid patients aged 65 to 85 years in primary care in Germany. Patients and general practitioners were interviewed between 2008 and 2009. Drug patterns were identified using exploratory factor analysis. The relations between the drug patterns with the three multimorbidity clusters were analysed with Spearman-Rank-Correlation.
Results: Patients (59.3% female) used in mean 7.7 drugs; in total 24,535 drugs (23.7% OTC) were detected. Five drug patterns for men (drugs for obstructive pulmonary diseases (D-OPD), drugs for coronary heart diseases and hypertension (D-CHD), drugs for osteoporosis (D-Osteo), drugs for heart failure and drugs for pain) and four drug patterns for women (D-Osteo, D-CHD, D-OPD and drugs for diuretics and gout) were detected. Significant associations between multimorbidity clusters and drug patterns were detectable (D-CHD and CMD: male: ρ = 0.376, CI 0.322-0.430; female: ρ = 0.301, CI 0.624-0.340).
Conclusion: The drug patterns demonstrate non-random relations in drug use in multimorbid elderly patients and systematic associations between drug patterns and multimorbidity clusters were found in primary care.
背景:老年人群面临多种疾病(三种慢性疾病)和随着年龄增长而增加的药物使用。对初级保健中老年患者的药物——包括处方药和非处方药(OTC)——的全面描述仍然不够。目的:本研究旨在通过识别药物模式来评估药物和药物组之间的关系,并揭示与最近发表的同一队列的多病集群的关联,从而表征初级保健和居家生活的多病老年患者的用药(处方和OTC)。方法:MultiCare是一项多中心、前瞻性、观察性队列研究,在德国进行了3189例年龄在65至85岁的多病患者的初级保健。患者和全科医生在2008年至2009年间接受了采访。使用探索性因子分析确定药物模式。采用spearman - rank相关分析药物类型与3种多病聚类之间的关系。结果:患者平均使用7.7种药物,女性占59.3%;共检出药品24535种,其中OTC占23.7%。检测到男性的五种药物模式(阻塞性肺疾病药物(D-OPD)、冠心病和高血压药物(D-CHD)、骨质疏松药物(D-Osteo)、心力衰竭药物和疼痛药物)和女性的四种药物模式(D-Osteo、D-CHD、D-OPD以及利尿剂和痛风药物)。多病集群与药物模式之间存在显著相关性(D-CHD和CMD:男性:ρ = 0.376, CI 0.322-0.430;女性:ρ = 0.301, CI 0.624-0.340)。结论:老年多病患者用药模式具有非随机关系,在初级保健中,用药模式与多病聚集性存在系统关联。
{"title":"Non-random relations in drug use expressed as patterns comprising prescription and over-the-counter drugs in multimorbid elderly patients in primary care: Data of the exploratory analysis of the multicentre, observational cohort study MultiCare.","authors":"Caroline Krüger, Ingmar Schäfer, Hendrik van den Bussche, Michael Baehr, Horst Bickel, Angela Fuchs, Jochen Gensichen, Wolfgang Maier, Steffi G Riedel-Heller, Hans-Helmut König, Anne Dahlhaus, Gerhard Schön, Siegfried Weyerer, Birgitt Wiese, Wolfgang von Renteln-Kruse, Claudia Langebrake, Martin Scherer","doi":"10.1080/13814788.2021.1933425","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13814788.2021.1933425","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The elderly population deals with multimorbidity (three chronic conditions) and increasinged drug use with age. A comprehensive characterisation of the medication - including prescription and over-the-counter (OTC) drugs - of elderly patients in primary care is still insufficient.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aims to characterise the medication (prescription and OTC) of multimorbid elderly patients in primary care and living at home by identifying drug patterns to evaluate the relationship between drugs and drug groups and reveal associations with recently published multimorbidity clusters of the same cohort.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>MultiCare was a multicentre, prospective, observational cohort study of 3189 multimorbid patients aged 65 to 85 years in primary care in Germany. Patients and general practitioners were interviewed between 2008 and 2009. Drug patterns were identified using exploratory factor analysis. The relations between the drug patterns with the three multimorbidity clusters were analysed with Spearman-Rank-Correlation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients (59.3% female) used in mean 7.7 drugs; in total 24,535 drugs (23.7% OTC) were detected. Five drug patterns for men (drugs for obstructive pulmonary diseases (D-OPD), drugs for coronary heart diseases and hypertension (D-CHD), drugs for osteoporosis (D-Osteo), drugs for heart failure and drugs for pain) and four drug patterns for women (D-Osteo, D-CHD, D-OPD and drugs for diuretics and gout) were detected. Significant associations between multimorbidity clusters and drug patterns were detectable (D-CHD and CMD: male: <i>ρ</i> = 0.376, CI 0.322-0.430; female: <i>ρ</i> = 0.301, CI 0.624-0.340).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The drug patterns demonstrate non-random relations in drug use in multimorbid elderly patients and systematic associations between drug patterns and multimorbidity clusters were found in primary care.</p>","PeriodicalId":54380,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of General Practice","volume":"27 1","pages":"119-129"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/13814788.2021.1933425","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9924704","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2021-12-01DOI: 10.1080/13814788.2021.1917544
Feike J Loots, Daan Smulders, Paul Giesen, Rogier M Hopstaken, Marleen Smits
Background: Signs of the systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) - fever (or hypothermia), tachycardia and tachypnoea - are used in the hospital setting to identify patients with possible sepsis.
Objectives: To determine how frequently abnormalities in the vital signs of SIRS are present in adult out-of-hours (OOH) primary care patients with suspected infections and assess the association with acute hospital referral.
Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional study at the OOH GP cooperative in Nijmegen, the Netherlands, between August and October 2015. GPs were instructed to record the body temperature, heart rate and respiratory rate of all patients with suspected acute infections. Vital signs of SIRS, other relevant signs and symptoms, and referral state were extracted from the electronic registration system of the OOH GP cooperative retrospectively. Logistic regression analysis was used to evaluate the association between clinical signs and hospital referral.
Results: A total of 558 patients with suspected infections were included. At least two SIRS vital signs were abnormal in 35/409 (8.6%) of the clinic consultations and 60/149 (40.3%) of the home visits. Referral rate increased from 13% when no SIRS vital sign was abnormal to 68% when all three SIRS vital signs were abnormal. Independent associations for referral were found for decreased oxygen saturation, hypotension and rapid illness progression, but not for individual SIRS vital signs.
Conclusion: Although patients with abnormal vital signs of SIRS were referred more often, decreased oxygen saturation, hypotension and rapid illness progression seem to be most important for GPs to guide further management.
{"title":"Vital signs of the systemic inflammatory response syndrome in adult patients with acute infections presenting in out-of-hours primary care: A cross-sectional study.","authors":"Feike J Loots, Daan Smulders, Paul Giesen, Rogier M Hopstaken, Marleen Smits","doi":"10.1080/13814788.2021.1917544","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13814788.2021.1917544","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Signs of the systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) - fever (or hypothermia), tachycardia and tachypnoea - are used in the hospital setting to identify patients with possible sepsis.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To determine how frequently abnormalities in the vital signs of SIRS are present in adult out-of-hours (OOH) primary care patients with suspected infections and assess the association with acute hospital referral.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a cross-sectional study at the OOH GP cooperative in Nijmegen, the Netherlands, between August and October 2015. GPs were instructed to record the body temperature, heart rate and respiratory rate of all patients with suspected acute infections. Vital signs of SIRS, other relevant signs and symptoms, and referral state were extracted from the electronic registration system of the OOH GP cooperative retrospectively. Logistic regression analysis was used to evaluate the association between clinical signs and hospital referral.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 558 patients with suspected infections were included. At least two SIRS vital signs were abnormal in 35/409 (8.6%) of the clinic consultations and 60/149 (40.3%) of the home visits. Referral rate increased from 13% when no SIRS vital sign was abnormal to 68% when all three SIRS vital signs were abnormal. Independent associations for referral were found for decreased oxygen saturation, hypotension and rapid illness progression, but not for individual SIRS vital signs.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although patients with abnormal vital signs of SIRS were referred more often, decreased oxygen saturation, hypotension and rapid illness progression seem to be most important for GPs to guide further management.</p>","PeriodicalId":54380,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of General Practice","volume":"27 1","pages":"83-89"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/13814788.2021.1917544","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9567621","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background: Breast cancer affects women's lives worldwide, yet early detection is an effective strategy for reducing mortality. The participation of women in mammography screening is linked to their knowledge, attitudes and perceived barriers.
Objectives: Our study aims to assess mammography screening uptake and barriers among women attending primary healthcare centres (PHCs) in northern Palestine.
Methods: Using an interviewer administered questionnaire, we used a cross-sectional study design to determine mammography screening uptake, knowledge and barriers among 357 women attending PHCs in Northern Palestine between December 2018 and March 2019.
Results: The mean age was 50 years. The majority (69.2%) were considered to have adequate knowledge about breast cancer and mammography screening. Mammography screening uptake among the participants was 37%. Almost 85% of the women had a positive attitude towards breastfeeding as a prophylaxis factor against breast cancer, while the most frequent barrier to mammography screening was that the participants believed they did not have any symptoms (28.6%), followed by 22.1% of them who did not want to know if they had breast cancer.
Conclusion: The findings of this study highlighted the low mammography uptake among Palestinian women despite the adequate knowledge of those women and the fully accessible and free screening programme. Hence, interventional strategies should be implemented at several levels to enhance mammogram uptake.
{"title":"Mammogram uptake and barriers among Palestinian women attending primary health care in North Palestine.","authors":"Suha Hamshari, Zaher Nazzal, Mariam Altell, Israa Nanaa, Rawan Jbara, Ruba Sabri","doi":"10.1080/13814788.2021.1985996","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13814788.2021.1985996","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Breast cancer affects women's lives worldwide, yet early detection is an effective strategy for reducing mortality. The participation of women in mammography screening is linked to their knowledge, attitudes and perceived barriers.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Our study aims to assess mammography screening uptake and barriers among women attending primary healthcare centres (PHCs) in northern Palestine.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using an interviewer administered questionnaire, we used a cross-sectional study design to determine mammography screening uptake, knowledge and barriers among 357 women attending PHCs in Northern Palestine between December 2018 and March 2019.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean age was 50 years. The majority (69.2%) were considered to have adequate knowledge about breast cancer and mammography screening. Mammography screening uptake among the participants was 37%. Almost 85% of the women had a positive attitude towards breastfeeding as a prophylaxis factor against breast cancer, while the most frequent barrier to mammography screening was that the participants believed they did not have any symptoms (28.6%), followed by 22.1% of them who did not want to know if they had breast cancer.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The findings of this study highlighted the low mammography uptake among Palestinian women despite the adequate knowledge of those women and the fully accessible and free screening programme. Hence, interventional strategies should be implemented at several levels to enhance mammogram uptake.</p>","PeriodicalId":54380,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of General Practice","volume":"27 1","pages":"264-270"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8510586/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9569176","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2021-12-01DOI: 10.1080/13814788.2021.1898582
Julian Wangler, Michael Jansky
Background: Obesity poses severe challenges for the health care system. GPs are in an advantageous position to contribute to preventing obesity by diagnosing patients and initiating treatment. Sporadic studies have shown that attitudes towards obesity management in primary care can have a major influence on treating patients successfully.
Objectives: The study focuses on attitudes and behavioural patterns towards obesity patients, willingness to provide care, approaches and strategies, and the challenges experienced.
Methods: After developing the interview guides based on a literature review, 36 GPs in North Rhine-Westphalia and Saarland, Germany, were interviewed between November 2019 and March 2020. Using qualitative typing according to Kluge, different prototypes of GPs were formed. The dimensions of the interview guides were used for deriving the prototypes.
Results: GPs were categorised into four types depending on how they saw themselves and their role in treating patients. The first type (the resigned) was conspicuous through its negative attitude towards obesity management and a lack of willingness to provide care. The second type (the instructors) emphasised the value of active exercise, diet and health promotion, while the third type (the motivators) saw psychosocial support and motivation as a key element in helping patients. In contrast, type four (the educators) focussed primarily on early prevention through patient education.
Conclusion: Depending on which (proto-)type a patient visits, different focuses and strategies are pursued for obesity management and doctor-patient communication. This results in different perspectives and chances of success about therapeutic measures.
{"title":"Attitudes, behaviours and strategies towards obesity patients in primary care: A qualitative interview study with general practitioners in Germany.","authors":"Julian Wangler, Michael Jansky","doi":"10.1080/13814788.2021.1898582","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13814788.2021.1898582","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Obesity poses severe challenges for the health care system. GPs are in an advantageous position to contribute to preventing obesity by diagnosing patients and initiating treatment. Sporadic studies have shown that attitudes towards obesity management in primary care can have a major influence on treating patients successfully.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The study focuses on attitudes and behavioural patterns towards obesity patients, willingness to provide care, approaches and strategies, and the challenges experienced.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>After developing the interview guides based on a literature review, 36 GPs in North Rhine-Westphalia and Saarland, Germany, were interviewed between November 2019 and March 2020. Using qualitative typing according to Kluge, different prototypes of GPs were formed. The dimensions of the interview guides were used for deriving the prototypes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>GPs were categorised into four types depending on how they saw themselves and their role in treating patients. The first type (the resigned) was conspicuous through its negative attitude towards obesity management and a lack of willingness to provide care. The second type (the instructors) emphasised the value of active exercise, diet and health promotion, while the third type (the motivators) saw psychosocial support and motivation as a key element in helping patients. In contrast, type four (the educators) focussed primarily on early prevention through patient education.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Depending on which (proto-)type a patient visits, different focuses and strategies are pursued for obesity management and doctor-patient communication. This results in different perspectives and chances of success about therapeutic measures.</p>","PeriodicalId":54380,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of General Practice","volume":"27 1","pages":"27-34"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/13814788.2021.1898582","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9572940","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background: In France, general practitioners (GPs) may use two tools specifically designed to help employees who experience difficulties in returning to work after sick leave: the pre-return-to-work (PRW) medical consultation and therapeutic part-time (TPT) work.
Objectives: The objective was to investigate the level of knowledge and use of these two tools by GPs in Maine-et-Loire, France.
Methods: This cross-sectional study was performed using a telephone questionnaire to evaluate the level of knowledge of GPs and the use of these two tools in patients having difficulties returning to work.
Results: Among the 200 randomly selected GPs, 122 responded (response rate: 61%). More than half of the interviewed GPs declared they 'often' (46%) or 'always' (14%) contacted the occupational physician in these situations. Moreover, 62.2% and 32.7% believed that they had a 'vague' or 'very good' level of knowledge, and 41% and 51% declared either 'frequent' or 'regular' level of use of the PRW medical consultation, respectively. Regarding TPT work, 47% and 53% reported a 'very good' or 'vague' level of knowledge, and 41% and 51% a 'frequent' or 'regular' level of use, respectively. GPs who had a better level of knowledge of this tool reported a higher level of use (p < 0.001).
Conclusion: This study shows that while the level of knowledge and use of the PRW medical consultation and TPT work is good, it is not optimal. This could be improved by organising training courses for GPs. Obstacles to their wider use could be investigated further in a qualitative study.
{"title":"Pre-return to work consultation and therapeutic part-time work: Cross-sectional study on level of knowledge and use by general practitioners in France.","authors":"Cyril Bègue, Lucille Desmidt, William Bellanger, Christine Tessier-Cazeneuve, Audrey Petit, Anne-Laure Couturier","doi":"10.1080/13814788.2021.1948007","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13814788.2021.1948007","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In France, general practitioners (GPs) may use two tools specifically designed to help employees who experience difficulties in returning to work after sick leave: the pre-return-to-work (PRW) medical consultation and therapeutic part-time (TPT) work.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The objective was to investigate the level of knowledge and use of these two tools by GPs in Maine-et-Loire, France.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional study was performed using a telephone questionnaire to evaluate the level of knowledge of GPs and the use of these two tools in patients having difficulties returning to work.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 200 randomly selected GPs, 122 responded (response rate: 61%). More than half of the interviewed GPs declared they 'often' (46%) or 'always' (14%) contacted the occupational physician in these situations. Moreover, 62.2% and 32.7% believed that they had a 'vague' or 'very good' level of knowledge, and 41% and 51% declared either 'frequent' or 'regular' level of use of the PRW medical consultation, respectively. Regarding TPT work, 47% and 53% reported a 'very good' or 'vague' level of knowledge, and 41% and 51% a 'frequent' or 'regular' level of use, respectively. GPs who had a better level of knowledge of this tool reported a higher level of use (<i>p</i> < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study shows that while the level of knowledge and use of the PRW medical consultation and TPT work is good, it is not optimal. This could be improved by organising training courses for GPs. Obstacles to their wider use could be investigated further in a qualitative study.</p>","PeriodicalId":54380,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of General Practice","volume":"27 1","pages":"158-165"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/13814788.2021.1948007","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9572952","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2021-12-01DOI: 10.1080/13814788.2021.1945029
Jean-Pascal Fournier, Jean-Baptiste Amélineau, Sandrine Hild, Jérôme Nguyen-Soenen, Anaïs Daviot, Benoit Simonneau, Paul Bowie, Liam Donaldson, Andrew Carson-Stevens
Background: The COVID-19 pandemic has resulted in the rapid reorganisation of health and social care services. Patients are already at significant risk of healthcare-associated harm and the wholesale disruption to service delivery during the pandemic stood to heighten those risks.
Objectives: We explored the type and nature of patient safety incidents in French primary care settings during the COVID-19 first wave to make tentative recommendations for improvement.
Methods: A national patient safety incident reporting survey was distributed to General Practitioners (GPs) in France on 28 April 2020. Reports were coded using a classification system aligned to the WHO International Classification for Patient Safety (incident types, contributing factors, incident outcomes and severity of harm). Analysis involved data coding, processing, iterative generation of data summaries using descriptive statistical analysis. Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT04346121.
Results: Of 132 incidents, 58 (44%) related to delayed diagnosis, assessments and referrals. Cancellations of appointments, hospitalisations or procedures was reported in 22 (17%) of these incidents. Home confinement-related incidents accounted for 13 (10%) reports and inappropriate medication stopping for five (4%). Patients delayed attending or did not consult their general practitioner or other healthcare providers due to their fear of contracting COVID-19 infection at an in-person visit in 26 (10%) incidents or fear of burdening their GPs in eight (3%) incidents.
Conclusion: Constraints from the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic have contributed to patient safety incidents during non-COVID-19 care. Lessons from these incidents pinpoint where primary care services in France can focus resources to design safer systems for patients.
{"title":"Patient-safety incidents during COVID-19 health crisis in France: An exploratory sequential multi-method study in primary care.","authors":"Jean-Pascal Fournier, Jean-Baptiste Amélineau, Sandrine Hild, Jérôme Nguyen-Soenen, Anaïs Daviot, Benoit Simonneau, Paul Bowie, Liam Donaldson, Andrew Carson-Stevens","doi":"10.1080/13814788.2021.1945029","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13814788.2021.1945029","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The COVID-19 pandemic has resulted in the rapid reorganisation of health and social care services. Patients are already at significant risk of healthcare-associated harm and the wholesale disruption to service delivery during the pandemic stood to heighten those risks.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We explored the type and nature of patient safety incidents in French primary care settings during the COVID-19 first wave to make tentative recommendations for improvement.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A national patient safety incident reporting survey was distributed to General Practitioners (GPs) in France on 28 April 2020. Reports were coded using a classification system aligned to the WHO International Classification for Patient Safety (incident types, contributing factors, incident outcomes and severity of harm). Analysis involved data coding, processing, iterative generation of data summaries using descriptive statistical analysis. Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT04346121.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 132 incidents, 58 (44%) related to delayed diagnosis, assessments and referrals. Cancellations of appointments, hospitalisations or procedures was reported in 22 (17%) of these incidents. Home confinement-related incidents accounted for 13 (10%) reports and inappropriate medication stopping for five (4%). Patients delayed attending or did not consult their general practitioner or other healthcare providers due to their fear of contracting COVID-19 infection at an in-person visit in 26 (10%) incidents or fear of burdening their GPs in eight (3%) incidents.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Constraints from the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic have contributed to patient safety incidents during non-COVID-19 care. Lessons from these incidents pinpoint where primary care services in France can focus resources to design safer systems for patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":54380,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of General Practice","volume":"27 1","pages":"142-151"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/13814788.2021.1945029","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9569916","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2021-12-01DOI: 10.1080/13814788.2021.1889505
Marijke S Labots-Vogelesang, Doreth A M Teunissen, Vivianne Kranenburg, Antoine L M Lagro-Janssen
Background: General practitioners (GPs) encounter women suffering from premenstrual symptoms. Often women with premenstrual problems experience little understanding from GPs. Views of GPs will influence their approach to these women and their care. Insight into these views is lacking but could help in designing educational programmes for GPs.
Objectives: To explore the views of Dutch GPs towards aetiology, diagnostic process, and preferred treatment of premenstrual symptoms.
Methods: In 2017, we conducted a qualitative, semi-structured, interview survey among 27 GPs, varying in age, gender, and practice setting.
Results: Important themes emerged from the interviews: 'no need for a symptom diary,' 'PMS defined as illness' exclusively in case of disruption of normal functioning, and 'symptomatic treatment' as preferred approach. Most GPs considered PMS to be a physiological phenomenon, with taking history as an adequate diagnostic tool. Almost all GPs regarded a normal cyclical hormonal cycle as causal; many also mentioned the combination with personal sensitivity. Some pointed to a dividing line between physiological condition and illness if women could not function normally in daily life. Lastly, the approach GPs preferred was focussing on relieving symptoms of individual patients. In addition to explaining the hormonal cycle and lifestyle advice, all GPs advocated oral contraceptives, and if necessary psychological support. GPs expressed negative feelings about prescribing antidepressants.
Conclusion: GPs considered physiological changes and personal sensitivity as aetiological factors. We recommend more training to improve GPs knowledge and more insight into the burden of women with PMS. A symptom diary is an essential diagnostic tool for GPs.
{"title":"Views of Dutch general practitioners about premenstrual symptoms: A qualitative interview study.","authors":"Marijke S Labots-Vogelesang, Doreth A M Teunissen, Vivianne Kranenburg, Antoine L M Lagro-Janssen","doi":"10.1080/13814788.2021.1889505","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13814788.2021.1889505","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>General practitioners (GPs) encounter women suffering from premenstrual symptoms. Often women with premenstrual problems experience little understanding from GPs. Views of GPs will influence their approach to these women and their care. Insight into these views is lacking but could help in designing educational programmes for GPs.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To explore the views of Dutch GPs towards aetiology, diagnostic process, and preferred treatment of premenstrual symptoms.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In 2017, we conducted a qualitative, semi-structured, interview survey among 27 GPs, varying in age, gender, and practice setting.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Important themes emerged from the interviews: 'no need for a symptom diary,' 'PMS defined as illness' exclusively in case of disruption of normal functioning, and 'symptomatic treatment' as preferred approach. Most GPs considered PMS to be a physiological phenomenon, with taking history as an adequate diagnostic tool. Almost all GPs regarded a normal cyclical hormonal cycle as causal; many also mentioned the combination with personal sensitivity. Some pointed to a dividing line between physiological condition and illness if women could not function normally in daily life. Lastly, the approach GPs preferred was focussing on relieving symptoms of individual patients. In addition to explaining the hormonal cycle and lifestyle advice, all GPs advocated oral contraceptives, and if necessary psychological support. GPs expressed negative feelings about prescribing antidepressants.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>GPs considered physiological changes and personal sensitivity as aetiological factors. We recommend more training to improve GPs knowledge and more insight into the burden of women with PMS. A symptom diary is an essential diagnostic tool for GPs.</p>","PeriodicalId":54380,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of General Practice","volume":"27 1","pages":"19-26"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/13814788.2021.1889505","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9572944","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}