Radiographics最新文献

Renal transplant is the first-line treatment of end-stage renal disease. The increasing number of transplants performed every year has led to a larger population of transplant patients. Complications may arise during the perioperative and postoperative periods, and imaging plays a key role in this scenario. Contrast-enhanced US (CEUS) is a safe tool that adds additional value to US. Contrast agents are usually administered intravenously, but urinary tract anatomy and complications such as stenosis or leak can be studied using intracavitary administration of contrast agents. Assessment of the graft and iliac vessels with CEUS is particularly helpful in identifying vascular and parenchymal complications, such as arterial or venous thrombosis and stenosis, acute tubular injury, or cortical necrosis, which can lead to graft loss. Furthermore, infectious and malignant graft involvement can be accurately studied with CEUS, which can help in detection of renal abscesses and in the differentiation between benign and malignant disease. CEUS is also useful in interventional procedures, helping to guide percutaneous aspiration of collections with better delimitation of the graft boundaries and to guide renal graft biopsies by avoiding avascular areas. Potential postprocedural vascular complications, such as pseudoaneurysm, arteriovenous fistula, or active bleeding, are identified with CEUS. In addition, newer quantification tools such as CEUS perfusion are promising, but further studies are needed to approve its use for clinical purposes. ^©RSNA, 2024 Supplemental material is available for this article.

Acute diaphragmatic abnormalities encompass a broad variety of relatively uncommon and underdiagnosed pathologic conditions, which can be subdivided into nontraumatic and traumatic entities. Nontraumatic abnormalities range from congenital hernia to spontaneous rupture, endometriosis-related disease, infection, paralysis, eventration, and thoracoabdominal fistula. Traumatic abnormalities comprise both blunt and penetrating injuries. Given the role of the diaphragm as the primary inspiratory muscle and the boundary dividing the thoracic and abdominal cavities, compromise to its integrity can yield devastating consequences. Yet, diagnosis can prove challenging, as symptoms may be vague and findings subtle. Imaging plays an essential role in investigation. Radiography is commonly used in emergency evaluation of a patient with a suspected thoracoabdominal process and may reveal evidence of diaphragmatic compromise, such as abdominal contents herniated into the thoracic cavity. CT is often superior, in particular when evaluating a trauma patient, as it allows rapid and more detailed evaluation and localization of pathologic conditions. Additional modalities including US, MRI, and scintigraphy may be required, depending on the clinical context. Developing a strong understanding of the acute pathologic conditions affecting the diaphragm and their characteristic imaging findings aids in efficient and accurate diagnosis. Additionally, understanding the appearance of diaphragmatic anatomy at imaging helps in differentiating acute pathologic conditions from normal variations. Ultimately, this knowledge guides management, which depends on the underlying cause, location, and severity of the abnormality, as well as patient factors. ^©RSNA, 2024 Supplemental material is available for this article.

The most common abdominal malignancies diagnosed in the pediatric population include neuroblastoma, Wilms tumor, hepatoblastoma, lymphoma, germ cell tumor, and rhabdomyosarcoma. There are distinctive imaging findings and patterns of spread for each of these tumors that radiologists must know for diagnosis and staging and for monitoring the patient's response to treatment. The multidisciplinary treatment group that includes oncologists, surgeons, and radiation oncologists relies heavily on imaging evaluation to identify the best treatment course and prognostication of imaging findings, such as the image-defined risk factors for neuroblastomas, the PRETreatment EXtent of Disease staging system for hepatoblastoma, and the Ann Arbor staging system for lymphomas. It is imperative for radiologists to be able to correctly indicate the best imaging methods for diagnosis, staging, and restaging of each of these most prevalent tumors to avoid inconclusive or unnecessary examinations. The authors review in a practical manner the most updated key points in diagnosing and staging disease and assessing response to treatment of the most common pediatric abdominal tumors. ^©RSNA, 2024 Supplemental material is available for this article.

High-frequency US, with a linear transducer and gray-scale, color, and spectral Doppler US techniques, is the primary imaging modality for evaluation of the penis. It can allow delineation of anatomy and assessment of dynamic blood flow; it is easily available and noninvasive or minimally invasive; it is cost effective; and it is well tolerated by patients. US assessment after pharmacologic induction of erection is an additional tool in assessing patients with suspected vasculogenic impotence, and also in selected patients with penile trauma and suspected Peyronie disease. Penile injuries, life-threatening infections, and vascular conditions such as priapism warrant rapid diagnosis to prevent long-term morbidities due to clinical misdiagnosis or delayed treatment. US can facilitate a timely diagnosis in these emergency conditions, even at the point of care such as the emergency department, which can facilitate timely treatment. In addition, color and spectral Doppler US are valuable applications in the follow-up of patients treated with endovascular revascularization procedures for vasculogenic erectile dysfunction. Image optimization and attention to meticulous techniques including Doppler US is vital to improve diagnostic accuracy. Radiologists should be familiar with the detailed US anatomy, pathophysiologic characteristics, scanning techniques, potential pitfalls, and US manifestations of a wide spectrum of vascular and nonvascular penile conditions to suggest an accurate diagnosis and direct further management. The authors review a range of common and uncommon abnormalities of the penis, highlight their key US features, discuss differential diagnosis considerations, and briefly review management. ^©RSNA, 2024 Supplemental material is available for this article.

With the approval of antifibrotic medications to treat patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis and progressive pulmonary fibrosis, radiologists have an integral role in diagnosing these entities and guiding treatment decisions. CT features of early pulmonary fibrosis include irregular thickening of interlobular septa, pleura, and intralobular linear structures, with subsequent progression to reticular abnormality, traction bronchiectasis or bronchiolectasis, and honeycombing. CT patterns of fibrotic lung disease can often be reliably classified on the basis of the CT features and distribution of the condition. Accurate identification of usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP) or probable UIP patterns by radiologists can obviate the need for a tissue sample-based diagnosis. Other entities that can appear as a UIP pattern must be excluded in multidisciplinary discussion before a diagnosis of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis is made. Although the imaging findings of nonspecific interstitial pneumonia and fibrotic hypersensitivity pneumonitis can overlap with those of a radiologic UIP pattern, these entities can often be distinguished by paying careful attention to the radiologic signs. Diagnostic challenges may include misdiagnosis of fibrotic lung disease due to pitfalls such as airspace enlargement with fibrosis, paraseptal emphysema, recurrent aspiration, and postinfectious fibrosis. The radiologist also plays an important role in identifying complications of pulmonary fibrosis-pulmonary hypertension, acute exacerbation, infection, and lung cancer in particular. In cases in which there is uncertainty regarding the clinical and radiologic diagnoses, surgical biopsy is recommended, and a multidisciplinary discussion among clinicians, radiologists, and pathologists can be used to address diagnosis and management strategies. This review is intended to help radiologists diagnose and manage pulmonary fibrosis more accurately, ultimately aiding in the clinical management of affected patients. ^©RSNA, 2024 Supplemental material is available for this article.

Cardiac tumors, although rare, carry high morbidity and mortality rates. They are commonly first identified either at echocardiography or incidentally at thoracoabdominal CT performed for noncardiac indications. Multimodality imaging often helps to determine the cause of these masses. Cardiac tumors comprise a distinct category in the World Health Organization (WHO) classification of tumors. The updated 2021 WHO classification of tumors of the heart incorporates new entities and reclassifies others. In the new classification system, papillary fibroelastoma is recognized as the most common primary cardiac neoplasm. Pseudotumors including thrombi and anatomic variants (eg, crista terminalis, accessory papillary muscles, or coumadin ridge) are the most common intracardiac masses identified at imaging. Cardiac metastases are substantially more common than primary cardiac tumors. Although echocardiography is usually the first examination, cardiac MRI is the modality of choice for the identification and characterization of cardiac masses. Cardiac CT serves as an alternative in patients who cannot tolerate MRI. PET performed with CT or MRI enables metabolic characterization of malignant cardiac masses. Imaging individualized to a particular tumor type and location is crucial for treatment planning. Tumor terminology changes as our understanding of tumor biology and behavior evolves. Familiarity with the updated classification system is important as a guide to radiologic investigation and medical or surgical management. ^©RSNA, 2024 Supplemental material is available for this article.

Various radiologic examinations and other diagnostic tools exist for evaluating gastrointestinal diseases. When symptoms of gastrointestinal disease persist and no underlying anatomic or structural abnormality is identified, the diagnosis of functional gastrointestinal disorder is frequently applied. Given its physiologic and quantitative nature, scintigraphy often plays a central role in the diagnosis and treatment of patients with suspected functional gastrointestinal disorder. Most frequently, after functional gallbladder disease is excluded, gastric emptying scintigraphy (GES) is considered the next step in evaluating patients with suspected gastric motility disorder who present with upper gastrointestinal symptoms such as dyspepsia or bloating. GES is the standard modality for detecting delayed gastric emptying (gastroparesis) and the less commonly encountered clinical entity, gastric dumping syndrome. Additionally, GES can be used to assess abnormalities of intragastric distribution, suggesting specific disorders such as impaired fundal accommodation or antral dysfunction, as well as to evaluate gastric emptying of liquid. More recently, scintigraphic examinations for evaluating small bowel and large bowel transit have been developed and validated for routine diagnostic use. These can be performed individually or as part of a comprehensive whole-gut transit evaluation. Such scintigraphic examinations are of particular importance because clinical assessment of suspected functional gastrointestinal disorder frequently fails to accurately localize the site of disease, and those patients may have motility disorders involving multiple portions of the gastrointestinal tract. The authors comprehensively review the current practice of gastrointestinal transit scintigraphy, with diseases and best imaging practices illustrated by means of case review. ^©RSNA, 2024 See the invited commentary by Maurer and Parkman in this issue.