Orthopade最新文献

Background: There are numerous non-surgical treatment options for basal thumb osteoarthritis (OA).

Objectives: Aetiology, clinical appearance and diagnosis of basal thumb OA, explanation of the individual non-surgical treatment options, presentation of the current state of studies.

Material and methods: Search for case analyses, studies, systematic reviews and meta-analyses using PubMed and LIVIVO.

Results: Intraarticular injections have no more than short-term success with the risk of infection, which should not be underestimated. Radiotherapy seems to be an effective treatment, but little research has been done on this. Physiotherapy and splinting treatment promise long-term improvement of clinical symptoms and hand function.

Conclusion: Basal thumb OA is a common and serious condition, which in the case of continuous pain should be diagnosed and treated adequately. A multi-modal therapeutic regimen with avoidance of repetitive intra-articular injections seems to provide the best long-term results.

Background: The aim of the study was to investigate whether the perioperative outcome and the operation-specific process variables in patients with total hip arthroplasty (THA) significantly deteriorate when the operation is performed by an inexperienced surgeon assisted by an experienced one in the context of a certified endoprosthesis center.

Material and methods: 1480 patients who received primary THA for primary coxarthrosis between 2013 and 2016 were included. The relevant data were retrospectively documented from the hospital information system, the discharge letter and the EndoCert form. The surgeons were divided according to their qualifications into experienced (senior surgeon, > 50 THA per year) and inexperienced surgeons (junior surgeon, < 50 THA per year). The collected data and measured variables were then compared based on this subdivision.

Results: Inexperienced surgeons showed a significant increase in the duration of the operation by 20.7 min (senior 62.6 ± 20.4 min; junior 83.3 ± 19.5 min; p ≤ 0.001), as well as the length of hospital stay by 0.25 days (senior 8.8 ± 0.9 days; junior 9.0 ± 0.9 days; p ≤ 0.001). The frequency of transfusions of red cell concentrates was significantly increased with inexperienced surgeons (senior 0.6 ± 1.1 items; junior 0.9 ± 1.4 items; p ≤ 0.001). In contrast, there was no difference in perioperative complications (p = 0.682) or in perioperative blood loss (senior 1.3 ± 0.5 l; junior 1.3 ± 0.5 l; p = 0.097). However, there was a positive correlation between the duration of the operation and blood loss (senior r = 0.183; junior r = 0.214; each p ≤ 0.01).

Conclusion: The training of inexperienced surgeons at a certified endoprosthesis center does not lead to a reduction in patient safety or increased complications when inexperienced surgeons are assisted by experienced surgeons. Due to the extended operating time, however, there is an additional burden on the clinics in competition with non-training clinics, which is not mapped in the DRG system.

Background: Hemiresection arthoplasty or partial trapeziectomy of the carpometacarpal joint of the thumb is a surgical option in stages 1-3 according to Eaton-Littler classification. Preservation of the intact scaphotrapeziotrapezoidal (STT) joint and maintenance of the length of the thumb is the advantage of this technique.

Technique: Technically, partial trapeziectomy is only slightly more complex compared to trapeziectomy with or without suspension. An interposition of autologous or allogeneic material is recommended; suspension arthroplasty is also possible in almost all common variants. Despite these theoretical advantages, this technique has not proven advantageous in practice, neither in terms of function nor in terms of time, compared to other techniques. The great advantage of partial trapeziectomy, however, is the wide range of options for revision surgery in the case of persistent complaints.

Results: The risk of proximalization of the thumb due to an inadequate interposition is generally minor and is usually caused by implant sintering. This can easily be compensated for by implanting a larger graft. Persistent instabilities are the most common cause of persistence of symptoms and can usually be remedied by autologous or allogeneic suspension arthroplasty. In addition, the entire range of endoprosthetics is also possible with a previous spare resection of the trapezium and the possibility of a complete trapeziectomy remains in any case. The obvious theoretical advantages of arthroscopic hemitrapeziectomy need to be confirmed in practice in future.

Background: Periprosthetic infection (PPI) is a rare but serious complication. An elementary component of the therapy of PPI is the use of bone cement with the addition of antibiotics. For targeted therapy, manual mixing of antibiotics with industrially produced bone cement mixtures is often necessary. Possible problems resulting from manual mixing have not been described sufficiently so far.

Objectives: Therefore, the aim of the present study was to describe the influence of the additional homogenisation by dry mixing of a polymer-active substance mixture on the quality of manually added cement.

Material and methods: In the laboratory-based study, four cement samples were prepared using different methods for manual addition and homogenisation of antibiotics (vancomycin). The reference control was Copal® G + V (Heraeus Medical GmbH, Wehrheim, Germany), to which the vancomycin (V) had already been industrially added. The samples were then examined for mechanical, microbiological and microscopic parameters.

Results: In the mechanical and microbiological results, no statistically significant differences were found between the manually added mixtures and the reference. After dry mixing of the polymer powder, the inner surface of the mixing cartridges used showed signs of scratching in the microscopic examination and showed indications of abrasion during mixing.

Conclusion: The manual addition of antibiotics to industrially produced bone cement should be reserved for selected indications if the bone cement mixtures produced by industry are not sufficient.

Due to the crucial role of the thumb for gripping, osteoarthritis of the first carpometacarpal joint leads to a substantial impairment of hand function. There are effective nonoperative and joint-preserving surgical treatment options for early stages of the disease. In advanced cases, after exploiting conservative treatment, carpometacarpal thumb arthrodesis or arthroplasty may be indicated in selected cases but trapeziectomy with or without interposition or suspension constitutes the gold standard surgical procedure. This reliably provides favorable results, irrespective of the technique, with pain relief, good physical function, excellent patient global assessment and low complication rates.

Background: In some cases, total knee arthroplasty (TKA) following high tibial osteotomy (HTO) is necessary. HTO can adversely affect anatomy and alignment resulting in more complicated and challenging TKA surgery. The aim of this study was to investigate whether patients having undergone HTO benefit from TKA to the same extent as patients with primary osteoarthritis of the knee.

Methods: A total of 44 patients after HTO and 1703 patients with primary osteoarthritis of the knee were identified in the local registry. To reduce confounders, a 1:1 propensity score matched-pair analysis (age, gender, BMI, comorbidities) was carried out in patients with a 5-year follow-up. This resulted in 35 matched pairs, which were compared for knee function, pain level, satisfaction and perioperative data (operative time, implant type, complications) and revisions.

Results: Patients having undergone HTO had no significant differences in knee function prior and 5 years after surgery but a significantly higher pain level. Despite the higher pain level before and after TKA, there was a similar satisfaction with the result of the surgery. The operative time for TKA was significantly longer after HTO and modular implants with stem and wedges were used significantly more often. The two cohorts did not differ with respect to complications within the first 3 months after surgery. The revision rate within 5 years was not increased in patients after HTO.

Conclusion: Patients having undergone HTO achieved a similar knee function in comparison to patients with primary osteoarthritis of the knee after TKA. However, a higher pre- and postoperative pain level was recorded in patients following HTO. The surgical effort was significantly higher after HTO.

Background: In 2019, 124,677 primary total knee arthroplasties and 14,462 revision TKA were performed in Germany. This corresponds to a percentage of 11.6%. According to the EPRD, the probability of further revision surgery after the first exchange operation is around 15%.

Reasons: The most common reason for revision surgery is still aseptic loosening with 23.9%. One possible cause could be the difficult fixation of revision total knee arthroplasty. If the bone quality is insufficient, cement-free or cemented diaphyseal anchoring of the prosthesis is often not sufficient to ensure adequate fixation. As a rule, defect management and fixation of the implant are based on the defect situation and the quality of the bone. Therefore, revision total knee arthroplasties based on the fixation principle of Jones et al. should be sufficiently fixed in at least 2 zones.

Techniques: There are various techniques for stable anchoring of revision implants. In addition to cemented or cementless stem anchoring, bone allografts, wedges and blocks and, in recent years, cones and sleeves have become increasingly popular. In the present work, the various options for a stable anchoring of revision implants are presented and evaluated. In addition, the clinical and radiological outcome of cones vs. sleeves in bone defect management in revision knee arthroplasty will be compared.

Background: Septic revision arthroplasty represents an interdisciplinary challenge in terms of diagnosis as well as surgical and follow-up treatment.

Diagnosis: The implementation of a standardized diagnostic algorithm including anamnesis, clinic, imaging, blood sampling and joint aspiration is essential. Depending on the duration of the symptoms acute (< 3 weeks) and chronic (> 3 weeks) infections are distinguished.

Therapy: While acute infections show an immature biofilm and can usually be addressed surgically via debridement and changing the mobile parts, chronic infections almost always require a complete change of the implant. This can be done in one or two stages, depending on the general condition of the patient, the pathogen, its resistances as well as the wound conditions. The surgical revision is always followed by a resistance-based antibiotic treatment.

Background and objective: It is evident from the national joint registries that numbers of revision knee arthroplasty operations are rising. The aim of this article is to introduce a new robotic-assisted approach in UKA to TKA revision arthroplasty and investigate the alignment accuracy, implant component use and surgery time and to compare it to primary robotic-assisted TKA arthroplasty.

Methods: This retrospective, case-control study included patients undergoing image-less robotic-assisted revision arthroplasty from UKA to TKA (n = 20) and patients undergoing image-less robotic-assisted primary TKA (control group, n = 20) from 11/2018 to 07/2020. The control group was matched based on the BMI and natural alignment. Comparison of groups was based on postoperative alignment, outlier rate, tibial insert size, lateral bone resection depth, incision-to-wound closure time. All surgeries were performed by a single senior surgeon using the same bi-cruciate stabilizing TKA system. Statistical analysis consisted of parametric t‑testing and Fisher's exact test with a level of significance of p < 0.05.

Results: The two groups showed no differences in mean BMI, natural alignment (p > 0.05) and mean overall limb alignment. No outlier was found for OLA and slope analysis. The smallest insert size (9 mm) was used in 70% of the cases in the revision group (n = 14) and in 90% of the cases in the primary group (n = 18, p = 0.24), distal femoral and tibial resection depth showed no statistical difference (p > 0.05). The incision to wound closure time was longer in the revision group but showed no significant difference.

Conclusion: Image-less robotic-assisted revision arthroplasty from UKA to TKA showed a comparable surgery time, and alignment accuracy in comparison to primary robotic-assisted TKA. Comparable bone preservation and subsequent tibial insert size use was observed for both groups.