Operative Orthopadie Und Traumatologie最新文献

Objective: Two-stage exchange with implantation of a temporary spacer is considered gold standard treatment for chronic periprosthetic joint infection of the knee. This article describes a simple and safe technique for handmade articulating spacers at the knee.

Indication: Chronic or relapsing periprosthetic joint infection of the knee.

Relative contraindications: Known allergy against components of polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) bone cements or admixed antibiotics. Inadequate compliance for two-stage exchange. Patient not able to undergo two-stage exchange. Bony defect situation at the tibia or femur leading to collateral ligament insufficiency. Soft tissue damage with need for plastic temporary vacuum-assisted wound closure (VAC) therapy.

Surgical technique: Removal of the prosthesis, thorough debridement of necrotic and granulation tissue, tailoring bone cement with antibiotics. Preparation of a tibial and femoral stem. Customizing the tibial and femoral articulating spacer components to bony anatomy and soft tissue tension. Confirmation of correct position by intraoperative radiography.

Postoperative management: Protection of the spacer with an external brace. Restricted weight-bearing. Passive range of motion as possible. Intravenous-followed by oral antibiotics. Reimplantation after successful treatment of infection.

Objective: Anterior stabilization of the spine with a lateral approach to insert a large and broad cage creating a better bearing surface to restore or maintain the lumbar lordosis.

Indications: Degenerative scoliosis as well as revision surgery for stenosis of the neuroforamen. Lumbar corpectomies between L2/3 and L4/5 can be approached as well.

Contraindications: The segment L5/S1 is not suitable for the transmuscular approach. Relative contraindications are previous retroperitoneal surgery and spondylolisthesis with sliding of more than 50% (> Meyerding 2) SURGICAL TECHNIQUE: We describe the transmuscular retroperitoneal approach to the lumbar segments which is called extreme lateral approach (XLIF). To protect the spinal nerves on the way through the psoas muscle, use of intraoperative triggered neuromonitoring is paramount.

Postoperative management: Full mobilization directly after surgery is possible in most cases. Weight bearing should be restricted to 20 kg for 3 months after surgery.

Results: The transmuscular approach to the lumbar spine is a good alternative to reach the anterior part of the lumbar spine. Degenerative scoliosis as well as stenosis of the neuroforamen especially in revision surgery are good indications for this technique. Injuries of the spinal nerves range from 0.7 to 15%. Other complications are rare.

Objective: To provide a natural scaffold, good quality cells, and growth factors to facilitate replacement of the complete osteochondral unit with matching talar curvature for large osteochondral lesions of the lateral talar dome.

Indications: Symptomatic primary and non-primary lateral osteochondral lesions of the talus not responding to conservative treatment. The anterior-posterior or medial-lateral diameter should exceed 10 mm on computed tomography (CT) for primary lesions; for secondary lesions, there are no size limitations.

Contraindications: Tibiotalar osteoarthritis grade III, malignancy, active infectious ankle joint pathology, and hemophilic or other diffuse arthropathy.

Surgical technique: Anterolateral arthrotomy is performed after which the Anterior TaloFibular Ligament (ATFL) is disinserted from the fibula. Additional exposure is achieved by placing a Hintermann distractor subluxating the talus ventrally. Thereafter, the osteochondral lesion is excised in toto from the talar dome. The recipient site is micro-drilled in order to disrupt subchondral bone vessels. Thereafter, the autograft is harvested from the ipsilateral iliac crest with an oscillating saw, after which the graft is adjusted to an exactly fitting shape to match the extracted lateral osteochondral defect and the talar morphology as well as curvature. The graft is implanted with a press-fit technique after which the ATFL is re-inserted followed by potential augmentation with an InternalBrace™ (Arthrex, Naples, FL, USA).

Postoperative management: Non-weightbearing cast for 6 weeks, followed by another 6 weeks with a walking boot. After 12 weeks, a computed tomography (CT) scan is performed to assess consolidation of the inserted autograft. The patient is referred to a physiotherapist.

Objective: Treatment of comminuted clavicle shaft fractures with minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis (MIPO).

Indications: Multifragmentary (≥ 2 intermediate fragments) clavicle shaft fractures with no need for anatomical reduction (AO 15.2B and 15.2C). Even simple fractures (AO 15.2A) with significant soft tissue injuries Tscherne grade I-III are suitable.

Contraindications: Medial or lateral clavicle fractures as well as simple fracture pattern where anatomical reduction is indispensable.

Surgical technique: Short incision over the medial and lateral end of the main fracture fragments. Either medial or lateral epiperosteal plate insertion. Under image intensifier guidance, the plate is centered either superior or anteroinferior on the clavicle and fixed with a compression wire temporarily (alternatively by a cortical screw) in one of the most lateral holes. Fracture reduction (axis, length, and rotation) over the plate and preliminary fixation medially. After correct reduction has been achieved, further cortical screws and/or locking head screws can be inserted (lag before locking screws). Relative stability is achieved by applying a bridging technique.

Postoperative management: No immobilization is needed. Patients are encouraged to perform functional rehabilitation with active and passive physical therapy. Loading is increased according to radiological signs of bony consolidation.

Results: In a retrospective evaluation from 2001-2021, 1128 clavicle osteosyntheses were performed, of which 908 (80.5%) were treated with plate osteosynthesis and 220 (19.5%) with titanium elastic nail (TEN). Of the 908 plate osteosyntheses, 43 (4.7%) were performed with the MIPO approach. Finally, 42 patients (35 men and 7 women; mean age of 44 ± 15 years) with 43 clavicle shaft fractures were analyzed. The operation was accomplished in 63 ± 28 min, and average fluoroscopy time was 45 ± 42 s. A collective of 27 patients could be evaluated after a median follow-up of 14 months (range 1-51 months). In all, 26 fractures healed in a timely manner. In 1 patient a pseudarthrosis occurred which was treated with re-osteosynthesis and cancellous bone grafting in an open technique. Another patient revealed a wound complication with need of operative wound revision 6 weeks after the index surgery. Further postoperative course was uneventful in both patients. All were pain-free and able to return to work. After an average of 17 ± 8 months, 18 hardware removals (66.7%) were performed.

Objective: The pararectus approach was rediscovered several years ago for pelvic surgery and described as an alternative approach especially for the treatment of acetabular fractures of the anterior column involving the quadrilateral plate.

Indications: For optimal visualization of acetabular fractures involving the quadrilateral plate, fractures of the anterior wall and anterior column, anterior column/posterior hemitransverse fractures, and fractures with central impression of dome fragments, the pararectus approach has proven to be a useful access.

Contraindications: The pararectus approach is not used for posterior column fractures, posterior wall fractures, combined posterior wall and posterior column fractures, transverse fractures with displaced posterior column or in combination with posterior wall fractures, and T‑fractures with displaced posterior column or in combination with posterior wall fractures.

Surgical technique: The entire pelvic ring, including the quadrilateral plate, can be accessed via the pararectus approach. The choice of the correct surgical window depends on the fracture location and the requirements of fracture reduction.

Postoperative management: In general, partial weight-bearing should be maintained for 6 weeks, although earlier weight-bearing release may be possible if necessary, depending on fracture pattern and osteosynthesis. Particularly in geriatric patients, partial weight-bearing is often not possible, so that early and often relatively uncontrolled full weight-bearing has to be accepted.

Results: In a comparative gait analysis between patients following surgical stabilization of an isolated unilateral acetabular fracture through the pararectus approach and healthy subjects, sufficient stability and motion function of the pelvis and hip during walking was already evident in the early postoperative phase.

Objective: Treatment of acetabular cartilage defects using autologous cartilage fragments.

Indications: Acetabular cartilage damage (1-6 cm²) associated with femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAIS).

Contraindications: Advanced osteoarthritis (≥ 2 according to Tönnis) and extensive acetabular cartilage damage > 6 cm². Lack of labral containment due to irreparable labral damage.

Surgical technique: Arthroscopic preparation of the acetabular cartilage damage and removal of unstable cartilage fragments using a 4.0 mm shaver, which minces the cartilage fragments. If necessary, additional cartilage harvesting over the CAM morphology requiring resection. Collection of the cartilage fragments using Graftnet^TM and augmentation with autologous conditioned plasma (ACP). Treatment of associated pathologies such as CAM morphology, pincer morphology, and labral refixation or reconstruction. Implantation of cartilage mass and remodeling into the defect zone. Final sealing with autologous fibrin.

Postoperative management: Postoperatively, weight bearing is restricted to 20 kg and range of motion to 90° of flexion for 6 weeks. This is supplemented by passive movement using a continuous passive motion (CPM) device.

Results: Since 2021, 13 patients treated with the described method were followed up for at least 6 months. A significant increase in the International Hip Outcome Tool (iHot)-12 and a significant reduction of pain were observed. No severe complications occurred.

Objective: Improved accuracy of spinal instrumentation with the use of intraoperative CT (iCT).

Indications: All types of posterior spinal instrumentation.

Contraindications: None.

Surgical technique: After fixation of the spinal clamp, an intraoperative CT (iCT) is performed. The image data set can then be used for navigation of the spinal implants. The arrangement of the devices, positioning of the patient, and the exact fixation of the clamp depend on the operation technique and the anatomical region. A high level of standardization is necessary for clinical success. In general, the utilization of drill guides over the use of awls and Yamshidi needles is strongly recommended. Thereby the risk of segmental vertebral rotation, especially in multisegmental instrumentation, will be reduced.

Postoperative management: The postoperative management depends on the type of surgery and is not influenced by the use of navigation with iCT.

Results: In our patient group of the first 200 surgeries with iCT (AIRO, Brainlab AG, Munich, Germany), we performed 34% cervical instrumentations, 31% percutaneous screw insertions, and 35% multisegmental open procedures including the sacrum or ilium. Two surgeries had to be converted to conventional technique due to technical problems. One misplaced S2/Ala/ilium screw had to be corrected in revision surgery. The infection rate was 2.5% and was not increased compared to conventional procedures. In the literature, a significant reduction of radiation exposure was shown, when iCT and navigation were used. Also, in longer surgical cases the operation time could be reduced. In comparison with 3D C‑arm imaging, the image quality and screw accuracy is improved by iCT. Due to the possibility of 3D intraoperative implant control, the number of revision cases can be reduced.

Objective: Pedicle screw-based posterior instrumentation of the spine.

Indications: Instability of the spine due to trauma, infection, degenerative spinal disease or tumor.

Contraindications: None.

Surgical technique: Robot-assisted navigated pedicle screw placement.

Postoperative management: Early functional mobilization starting on the first postoperative day.

Results: A study by Lee et al. analyzed the clinical application of the system Mazor X Stealth Edition (Medtronic Navigation, Louisville, CO, USA; Medtronic Spine, Memphis, TN, USA) in 186 cases with a total of 1445 pedicle screws [1]. Correct screw positioning was achieved in 1432 pedicle screws (99.1%); six pedicle screws (0.4%) were revised intraoperatively. The mean duration of pedicle screw placement was 6.1 ± 2.3 min. Pojskić et al. published a case series regarding the application of the system Cirq (Brainlab, Munich, Germany) in 13 cases with a total number of 70 pedicle screws implanted [2]. Intraoperative imaging showed screw positioning according to the Gertzbein Robbins classification (GR) category A in 65 screws (92.9%) and GR B in one screw (1.4%). Screw positioning GR D with intraoperative revision was reported in two screws (2.9%). Mean duration of pedicle screw placement was 08:27 ± 06:54 min.