Journal of Perinatal & Neonatal Nursing最新文献

Purpose: The purpose of the study was to investigate the relationship between state regulation of the midwifery workforce, practice environment, and burnout.

Background: Burnout threatens the US midwifery workforce, with over 40% of certified nurse-midwives meeting criteria. Burnout can lead to poorer physical and mental health and withdrawal from the workforce. Burnout in midwives has been associated with lack of control and autonomy. In the United States, midwives' autonomy is restricted through state-level regulation that limits scope of practice and professional independence.

Methods: A mixed-methods study was conducted using an explanatory sequential approach. Quantitative and qualitative data were collected by online surveys and analyzed in a 2-stage process, followed by data integration.

Results: State regulation was not found to be independently associated with burnout (n = 248; P = .250); however, mediation analysis showed a significant association between state regulation, practice environment, and burnout. Qualitative analysis mirrored the importance of practice environment and expanded on its features.

Conclusion: For midwives, unrestrictive practice regulation may not translate to burnout prevention without supportive practice environments.

Implications for practice and research: Interventions should focus on promoting job flexibility, realistic demands, and professional values. While midwives' commitment to patients and the profession can help bolster the workforce, it can also amplify negative experiences of the practice environment.

Purpose: To examine the effect of nurse staffing in varying work environments on missed breastfeeding teaching and support in inpatient maternity units in the United States.

Background: Breast milk is the optimal food for newborns. Teaching and supporting women in breastfeeding are primarily a nurse's responsibility. Better maternity nurse staffing (fewer patients per nurse) is associated with less missed breastfeeding teaching and support and increased rates of breastfeeding. We examined the extent to which the nursing work environment, staffing, and nurse education were associated with missed breastfeeding care and how the work environment and staffing interacted to impact missed breastfeeding care.

Methods: In this cross-sectional study using the 2015 National Database of Nursing Quality Indicator survey, maternity nurses in hospitals in 48 states and the District of Columbia responded about their workplace and breastfeeding care. Clustered logistic regression models with interactions were used to estimate the effects of the nursing work environment and staffing on missed breastfeeding care.

Results: There were 19 486 registered nurses in 444 hospitals. Nearly 3 in 10 (28.2%) nurses reported missing breastfeeding care. In adjusted models, an additional patient per nurse was associated with a 39% increased odds of missed breastfeeding care. Furthermore, 1 standard deviation decrease in the work environment was associated with a 65% increased odds of missed breastfeeding care. In an interaction model, staffing only had a significant impact on missed breastfeeding care in poor work environments.

Conclusions: We found that the work environment is more fundamental than staffing for ensuring that not only breastfeeding care is not missed but also breastfeeding care is sensitive to nurse staffing. Improvements to the work environment support the provision of breastfeeding care.

Implications for research and practice: Both nurse staffing and the work environment are important for improving breastfeeding rates, but the work environment is foundational.

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic impacted healthcare systems, including resuscitation training programs such as Helping Babies Breathe (HBB). Nepal, a country with limited healthcare resources, faces challenges in delivering effective HBB training, managing deliveries, and providing neonatal care, particularly in remote areas.

Aims: This study assessed HBB skills and knowledge postpandemic through interviews with key stakeholders in Nepal. It aimed to identify strategies, adaptations, and innovations to address training gaps and scale-up HBB.

Methods: A qualitative approach was used, employing semistructured interviews about HBB program effectiveness, pandemic challenges, stakeholder engagement, and suggestions for improvement.

Results: The study encompassed interviews with 23 participants, including HBB trainers, birth attendants, officials, and providers. Thematic analysis employed a systematic approach by deducing themes from study aims and theory. Data underwent iterative coding and refinement to synthesize content yielding following 5 themes: (1) pandemic's impact on HBB training; (2) resource accessibility for training postpandemic; (3) reviving HBB training; (4) impacts on the neonatal workforce; and (5) elements influencing HBB training progress.

Conclusion: Postpandemic, healthcare workers in Nepal encounter challenges accessing essential resources and delivering HBB training, especially in remote areas. Adequate budgeting and strong commitment from healthcare policy levels are essential to reduce neonatal mortality in the future.

Objective: Although breastfeeding in the first 6 months postpartum benefits both infants and mothers, breastfeeding rates remain low. This study examined whether group prenatal care was associated with an increased breastfeeding initiation and duration compared with those receiving usual, individual prenatal care. A secondary aim was to investigate whether sociodemographic and motivational factors were associated with breastfeeding initiation and duration across prenatal care groups.

Methods: Pregnant women in their third trimester (n = 211) from an innercity university medical center participated. Prenatal care type was identified from the medical chart, and data on breastfeeding duration at 1, 3, and 6 months postpartum were collected. Breastfeeding motivational factors were assessed with a survey. Logistic regressions and independent-samples t tests were used for data analyses.

Results: After controlling for demographic factors, group prenatal care was associated with increased breastfeeding at 6 months postpartum (odds ratio = 2.66; P = .045) compared with individual care. Breastfeeding intention (P < .001), competence (P = .003), and autonomous motivation (P < .001) were significantly higher, while amotivation (P = .034) was significantly lower in group compared with individual prenatal care.

Conclusions: Breastfeeding persistence was higher among women receiving group prenatal care, potentially due to motivational factors. Future studies should investigate how breastfeeding motivational factors could be effectively targeted in prenatal care to increase breastfeeding persistence.

Background: Gastric tube insertion is necessary to support early enteral feeding of newborns during their neonatal intensive care stay. This frequent and invasive procedure is known to be painful. Very few analgesic techniques (sweet solutions, sucking, swaddling, and skin-to-skin contact) are available to reduce the pain caused by orogastric tube insertion procedure.

Objective: To determine whether a new orogastric tube insertion technique modifies the pain response in newborns, we hypothesize that inserting an orogastric tube through the nipple of a bottle reduces pain caused by this procedure.

Design: Prospective, controlled, randomized, multicentered and open label study.

Settings: Three neonatal intensive care units in France (2 level 3 units and 1 level 2B).

Participants: Full-term or premature newborns at 32 weeks of gestation or more, postnatal age between 48 hours and 21 days, not ventilated and requiring enteral feeding, were randomized into 2 groups: usual technique (n = 36) and experimental technique (n = 35).

Methods: Our experimental technique was to insert the orogastric tube through a modified nipple of a bottle. This method was compared with the usual technique of inserting the tube directly into the newborn's mouth without a support to guide it accompanied by a nipple encouraging sucking with a nonnutritive solution. An association of nonnutritive sucking and orally administered 30% glucose was given to all children for analgesic purposes. Pain during the orogastric tube insertion was assessed on video recordings by 2 independent experts, using a heteroassessment behavioral scale for pain (DAN-Douleur Aiguë du Nouveau-né; APN-Acute Pain in Newborns). The primary outcome was an Acute Pain in Newborns score of less than 3 at the time of the procedure. Comparisons were made using Fisher exact test or Mann-Whitney U test. Factors associated with an Acute Pain in Newborns score of 3 and greater were explored using univariable and multivariable regression models.

Results: All but 1 video recording in each group were analyzed. Among the 34 neonates in the experimental group, 71.4% (95% CI: [53.7-85.4]) had an Acute Pain in Newborns score of less than 3 during orogastric tube insertion versus 41% (95% CI: [27.9-61.9]) in the control group (P = .031). Gagging was frequent and nonsignificantly different between the 2 groups (69% in the control group, 51% in the experimental group, P = .13). In multivariable analysis, the experimental technique was an independent factor of pain prevention compared with the usual technique (odds ratio = 0.21 [0.06-0.71], P = .015).

Conclusions: This study suggests that a simple, inexpensive, and feasible technique of orogastric tube insertion through the nipple of a bottle limits pain associated with this procedure in newborns.