Pub Date : 2025-01-01Epub Date: 2025-08-22DOI: 10.1007/s10592-025-01720-3
Sophia A Coveney, Eva Jiménez-Guri, Samantha Ball, Nathalie Mianseko, Annette C Broderick, Brendan J Godley, Joana M Hancock, Welton Quirino Pereira, Aissa Regalla, Rita Gomes Rocha, Cheibani Senhoury, Benoit de Thoisy, Dominic Tilley, Sarah Maria Vargas, Sam B Weber, Ana Rita Patrício
Marine turtles undertake long migrations across different geographies and habitats, exposing them to a wide range of threats throughout their lifespan. Analysing population structure and connectivity is key to informing effective conservation management. We expand knowledge of Atlantic-wide connectivity of green turtles (Chelonia mydas) by characterising the genetic structure of the Ascension Island nesting population, one of the largest in the Atlantic Ocean, and carrying out Atlantic population structure and mixed stock analyses using high-resolution genetic markers. We amplified a ~ 738 bp fragment (extended D-loop) and a highly polymorphic mitochondrial short tandem repeat (mtSTR) fragment of the mitochondrial DNA control region, designating haplotypes based on (1) extended D-loop and (2) the extended D-loop and mtSTR combined. Overall, 11 extended D-loop and 33 combined haplotypes were found, the dominant haplotypes being CM-A8.1 and CM-A8.1/7-12-4-4. Population structure analysis found three main genetic groups: Northwest Atlantic, Northern South America, and South and East Atlantic. Mixed stock analyses indicate Ascension Island as a major source for juvenile foraging aggregations in the Southwest Atlantic (34-55%) and Central Africa (18-78%), with some contribution to West Africa (3-20%). Green turtles are vulnerable to fishery bycatch in the coastal waters of the South and East Atlantic. Our study underlines how improving sample sizes of Atlantic mtSTR haplotypes could further elucidate green turtle connectivity across threatened regions. We urge international collaboration to minimise mtSTR data gaps, in order to enhance connectivity assessments and improve conservation measures between countries that share populations.
Supplementary information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10592-025-01720-3.
{"title":"Atlantic-wide connectivity of Ascension Island green turtles revealed by finer-scale mitochondrial DNA markers.","authors":"Sophia A Coveney, Eva Jiménez-Guri, Samantha Ball, Nathalie Mianseko, Annette C Broderick, Brendan J Godley, Joana M Hancock, Welton Quirino Pereira, Aissa Regalla, Rita Gomes Rocha, Cheibani Senhoury, Benoit de Thoisy, Dominic Tilley, Sarah Maria Vargas, Sam B Weber, Ana Rita Patrício","doi":"10.1007/s10592-025-01720-3","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s10592-025-01720-3","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Marine turtles undertake long migrations across different geographies and habitats, exposing them to a wide range of threats throughout their lifespan. Analysing population structure and connectivity is key to informing effective conservation management. We expand knowledge of Atlantic-wide connectivity of green turtles (<i>Chelonia mydas</i>) by characterising the genetic structure of the Ascension Island nesting population, one of the largest in the Atlantic Ocean, and carrying out Atlantic population structure and mixed stock analyses using high-resolution genetic markers. We amplified a ~ 738 bp fragment (extended D-loop) and a highly polymorphic mitochondrial short tandem repeat (mtSTR) fragment of the mitochondrial DNA control region, designating haplotypes based on (1) extended D-loop and (2) the extended D-loop and mtSTR combined. Overall, 11 extended D-loop and 33 combined haplotypes were found, the dominant haplotypes being CM-A8.1 and CM-A8.1/7-12-4-4. Population structure analysis found three main genetic groups: Northwest Atlantic, Northern South America, and South and East Atlantic. Mixed stock analyses indicate Ascension Island as a major source for juvenile foraging aggregations in the Southwest Atlantic (34-55%) and Central Africa (18-78%), with some contribution to West Africa (3-20%). Green turtles are vulnerable to fishery bycatch in the coastal waters of the South and East Atlantic. Our study underlines how improving sample sizes of Atlantic mtSTR haplotypes could further elucidate green turtle connectivity across threatened regions. We urge international collaboration to minimise mtSTR data gaps, in order to enhance connectivity assessments and improve conservation measures between countries that share populations.</p><p><strong>Supplementary information: </strong>The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10592-025-01720-3.</p>","PeriodicalId":55212,"journal":{"name":"Conservation Genetics","volume":"26 6","pages":"1029-1047"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12540526/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145356915","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-09-17DOI: 10.1007/s10592-024-01641-7
Linus Söderquist, Sophie Karrenberg, Nina Sletvold
Assisted gene flow can restore genetic diversity when genetic drift has driven deleterious alleles to high frequencies in small, isolated populations. Previous crosses among 20 populations of Gymnadenia conopsea documented the strongest heterosis and the weakest inbreeding depression in sparse and small populations, consistent with fixation of mildly deleterious alleles by genetic drift. We genotyped the populations used for crosses, and used 1200–1728 SNPs to test the following predictions: (1) heterosis increases with genetic differentiation (FST) to donor populations and decreases with genetic diversity in the recipient population, (2) inbreeding depression increases with genetic diversity, and (3) genetic diversity increases, and mean FST to other populations decreases, with population size and density. Pairwise FST ranged from very low to moderate (0.005–0.20) and genetic diversity varied moderately among populations (proportion of polymorphic loci = 0.52–0.75). However, neither FST between populations, nor genetic diversity in the recipient population, were related to the strength of heterosis. There was also no association between genetic diversity and the strength of inbreeding depression. Genetic diversity increased and mean FST decreased with population size, consistent with reduced diversity and increased differentiation of small populations by genetic drift. The results indicate that the loci conferring heterosis are not mirrored by overall population differentiation, and limited additional information on potential source populations for genetic rescue is gained by the genetic data. Instead, the use of controlled crosses can directly reveal positive effects of introducing new genetic material, and is a simple method with high potential in conservation.
{"title":"Genetic differentiation and diversity do not explain variation in heterosis or inbreeding depression: empirical evidence from a long-lived iteroparous plant","authors":"Linus Söderquist, Sophie Karrenberg, Nina Sletvold","doi":"10.1007/s10592-024-01641-7","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10592-024-01641-7","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Assisted gene flow can restore genetic diversity when genetic drift has driven deleterious alleles to high frequencies in small, isolated populations. Previous crosses among 20 populations of <i>Gymnadenia conopsea</i> documented the strongest heterosis and the weakest inbreeding depression in sparse and small populations, consistent with fixation of mildly deleterious alleles by genetic drift. We genotyped the populations used for crosses, and used 1200–1728 SNPs to test the following predictions: (1) heterosis increases with genetic differentiation (<i>F</i><sub><i>ST</i></sub>) to donor populations and decreases with genetic diversity in the recipient population, (2) inbreeding depression increases with genetic diversity, and (3) genetic diversity increases, and mean <i>F</i><sub><i>ST</i></sub> to other populations decreases, with population size and density. Pairwise <i>F</i><sub><i>ST</i></sub> ranged from very low to moderate (0.005–0.20) and genetic diversity varied moderately among populations (proportion of polymorphic loci = 0.52–0.75). However, neither <i>F</i><sub><i>ST</i></sub> between populations, nor genetic diversity in the recipient population, were related to the strength of heterosis. There was also no association between genetic diversity and the strength of inbreeding depression. Genetic diversity increased and mean <i>F</i><sub><i>ST</i></sub> decreased with population size, consistent with reduced diversity and increased differentiation of small populations by genetic drift. The results indicate that the loci conferring heterosis are not mirrored by overall population differentiation, and limited additional information on potential source populations for genetic rescue is gained by the genetic data. Instead, the use of controlled crosses can directly reveal positive effects of introducing new genetic material, and is a simple method with high potential in conservation.</p>","PeriodicalId":55212,"journal":{"name":"Conservation Genetics","volume":"18 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2024-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142263030","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-09-11DOI: 10.1007/s10592-024-01640-8
Roberto V. Cucalón, Joel B. Corush, Matthew L. Niemiller, Amanda N. Curtis, Pamela B. Hart, Bernard R. Kuhajda, Matthew R. Thomas, Brian Metzke, Mark A. Davis, Milton Tan
The North American freshwater genus Forbesichthys is composed of facultative cave-dwelling fishes restricted to springs and caves in southern Illinois, southeastern Missouri, southwestern Kentucky, and central Tennessee. These fishes were previously considered a single species, the Spring Cavefish (F. agassizii), but recent molecular evidence led to the recognition of the Shawnee Hills Cavefish (F. papilliferus). The Shawnee Hills Cavefish is hypothesized to be restricted to Illinois, Missouri, Kentucky and north-central Tennessee, whereas the Spring Cavefish is restricted to the Eastern Highland Rim of central Tennessee. However, the distributions of Forbesichthys are difficult to ascertain due to their intermittent appearance in surface springs, making sampling challenging. We assessed the species status, distribution, connectivity, and population sizes of the Forbesichthys spp. using Restriction-site Associated DNA sequencing (RADseq) and the mitochondrial NADH dehydrogenase 2 locus. Our results corroborate the recognition and hypothesized distributions of the Shawnee Hills Cavefish and Spring Cavefish. Furthermore, we suggest the recognition of three Evolutionary Significant Units (ESUs) and two Management Units (MUs) within the Shawnee Hills Cavefish. Although all populations analyzed appear to have reasonable genetic diversity and population stability over time, this regionalization has implications for both groundwater policy and management. Our study provides important information relevant to understanding potential population distributions and the identification of unique lineages that may deserve additional protection.
{"title":"Population genomics and mitochondrial DNA reveal cryptic diversity in North American Spring Cavefishes (Amblyopsidae, Forbesichthys)","authors":"Roberto V. Cucalón, Joel B. Corush, Matthew L. Niemiller, Amanda N. Curtis, Pamela B. Hart, Bernard R. Kuhajda, Matthew R. Thomas, Brian Metzke, Mark A. Davis, Milton Tan","doi":"10.1007/s10592-024-01640-8","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10592-024-01640-8","url":null,"abstract":"<p>The North American freshwater genus <i>Forbesichthys</i> is composed of facultative cave-dwelling fishes restricted to springs and caves in southern Illinois, southeastern Missouri, southwestern Kentucky, and central Tennessee. These fishes were previously considered a single species, the Spring Cavefish (<i>F. agassizii</i>), but recent molecular evidence led to the recognition of the Shawnee Hills Cavefish (<i>F. papilliferus</i>). The Shawnee Hills Cavefish is hypothesized to be restricted to Illinois, Missouri, Kentucky and north-central Tennessee, whereas the Spring Cavefish is restricted to the Eastern Highland Rim of central Tennessee. However, the distributions of <i>Forbesichthys</i> are difficult to ascertain due to their intermittent appearance in surface springs, making sampling challenging. We assessed the species status, distribution, connectivity, and population sizes of the <i>Forbesichthys</i> spp. using Restriction-site Associated DNA sequencing (RADseq) and the mitochondrial NADH dehydrogenase 2 locus. Our results corroborate the recognition and hypothesized distributions of the Shawnee Hills Cavefish and Spring Cavefish. Furthermore, we suggest the recognition of three Evolutionary Significant Units (ESUs) and two Management Units (MUs) within the Shawnee Hills Cavefish. Although all populations analyzed appear to have reasonable genetic diversity and population stability over time, this regionalization has implications for both groundwater policy and management. Our study provides important information relevant to understanding potential population distributions and the identification of unique lineages that may deserve additional protection.</p>","PeriodicalId":55212,"journal":{"name":"Conservation Genetics","volume":"63 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2024-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142226597","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-09-10DOI: 10.1007/s10592-024-01636-4
Robyn E. Shaw, Brittany Brockett, Jennifer C. Pierson, Stephen D. Sarre, Paula Doyle, Hannah B. Cliff, Mark D. B. Eldridge, Kimberly A. Miller, Kym Ottewell, Marissa L. Parrott, Maurizio Rossetto, Paul Sunnucks, Sam C. Banks, Margaret Byrne, Bridget L. Campbell, Caroline Chong, Emilie J. Ens, Paul A. Ferraro, Catherine E. Grueber, Peter A. Harrison, Carolyn Hogg, Marlee Hutton, Emily Roycroft, Will Sowersby, Karajarri Rangers, Kiwirrkurra Rangers, Ngurrara Rangers, Nyangumarta Rangers, Ngururrpa Rangers, Linda E. Neaves
Genetic diversity is the foundation of biodiversity, and preserving it is therefore fundamental to conservation practice. However, global conservation efforts face significant challenges integrating genetic and genomic approaches into applied management and policy. As collaborative partnerships are increasingly recognized as key components of successful conservation efforts, we explore their role and relevance in the Australian context, by engaging with key entities from across the conservation sector, including academia, botanic gardens, herbaria, seed banks, governmental/non-governmental organisations, private industry, museums, Traditional Owners, Indigenous rangers, and zoos and aquaria. By combining perspectives from these entities with comprehensive literature review, we identified five guiding principles for conservation genetic and genomic research and explored the different elements of, and approaches to, collaboration. Our reflections suggest that there is a substantial overlap in research interests across the Australian conservation sector, and our findings show that collaboration is increasing. We discuss approaches to building collaborative partnerships, the reciprocal benefits of collaborating, and some remaining challenges associated with data generation, data collection, and cross-cultural considerations. We emphasise the need for long-term national resourcing for sample and data storage and consistency in collecting, generating and reporting genetic data. While informed by the Australian experience, our goal is to support researchers and practitioners to foster meaningful collaborations that achieve measurable management outcomes in conservation genetics and genomics, both in Australia and globally.
{"title":"Building meaningful collaboration in conservation genetics and genomics","authors":"Robyn E. Shaw, Brittany Brockett, Jennifer C. Pierson, Stephen D. Sarre, Paula Doyle, Hannah B. Cliff, Mark D. B. Eldridge, Kimberly A. Miller, Kym Ottewell, Marissa L. Parrott, Maurizio Rossetto, Paul Sunnucks, Sam C. Banks, Margaret Byrne, Bridget L. Campbell, Caroline Chong, Emilie J. Ens, Paul A. Ferraro, Catherine E. Grueber, Peter A. Harrison, Carolyn Hogg, Marlee Hutton, Emily Roycroft, Will Sowersby, Karajarri Rangers, Kiwirrkurra Rangers, Ngurrara Rangers, Nyangumarta Rangers, Ngururrpa Rangers, Linda E. Neaves","doi":"10.1007/s10592-024-01636-4","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10592-024-01636-4","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Genetic diversity is the foundation of biodiversity, and preserving it is therefore fundamental to conservation practice. However, global conservation efforts face significant challenges integrating genetic and genomic approaches into applied management and policy. As collaborative partnerships are increasingly recognized as key components of successful conservation efforts, we explore their role and relevance in the Australian context, by engaging with key entities from across the conservation sector, including academia, botanic gardens, herbaria, seed banks, governmental/non-governmental organisations, private industry, museums, Traditional Owners, Indigenous rangers, and zoos and aquaria. By combining perspectives from these entities with comprehensive literature review, we identified five guiding principles for conservation genetic and genomic research and explored the different elements of, and approaches to, collaboration. Our reflections suggest that there is a substantial overlap in research interests across the Australian conservation sector, and our findings show that collaboration is increasing. We discuss approaches to building collaborative partnerships, the reciprocal benefits of collaborating, and some remaining challenges associated with data generation, data collection, and cross-cultural considerations. We emphasise the need for long-term national resourcing for sample and data storage and consistency in collecting, generating and reporting genetic data. While informed by the Australian experience, our goal is to support researchers and practitioners to foster meaningful collaborations that achieve measurable management outcomes in conservation genetics and genomics, both in Australia and globally.</p>","PeriodicalId":55212,"journal":{"name":"Conservation Genetics","volume":"46 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2024-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142208224","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-09-06DOI: 10.1007/s10592-024-01633-7
Corinna Breusing, Shannon B. Johnson, Verena Tunnicliffe, Robert C. Vrijenhoek
{"title":"Correction: Population structure and connectivity in Indo-Pacific deep-sea mussels of the Bathymodiolus septemdierum complex","authors":"Corinna Breusing, Shannon B. Johnson, Verena Tunnicliffe, Robert C. Vrijenhoek","doi":"10.1007/s10592-024-01633-7","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10592-024-01633-7","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":55212,"journal":{"name":"Conservation Genetics","volume":"6 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2024-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142208225","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-09-05DOI: 10.1007/s10592-024-01638-2
Monica R. Cooper, Andrew Edwards, Julie Van Stappen, Ronald Nordin, Dylan Jennings, Jonathan N. Pauli
Understanding factors that influence the viability of populations is central to conservation biology. Small and isolated populations have elevated risk of extinction due to demographic and genetic stochasticity. The Apostle Islands National Lakeshore features a genetically unique and culturally important population of archipelagic black bears (Makwa; Ursus americanus). While dispersal is central to population viability, previous studies of this population did not sample the adjacent mainland black bear population on the Red Cliff Reservation (Gaa-miskwaabikaang). Therefore, we lack robust estimates of dispersal, gene flow and overall connectivity among the islands and with the mainland population. In partnership with Red Cliff Band of Lake Superior Chippewa and the National Park Service, we non-invasively collected black bear hair, and used 17 microsatellite markers to genotype 141 black bears. We then estimated genetic diversity, population structure, dispersal, and conducted a pedigree network analysis to identify areas of the archipelago important for connectivity and reproduction. We found evidence of a well-connected archipelagic bear population structured into five clusters and characterized by moderate dispersal between islands and mainland. We found that three of the islands are disproportionately important for genetically connecting the archipelago, but the islands were nevertheless reliant upon the mainland for gene flow and genetic diversity. The high connectivity between islands and the mainland demonstrates a potential metapopulation dynamic, where islands may serve as a reservoir of individuals for the mainland and the mainland supplying individuals likely important for maintaining genetic diversity of island populations. Given the importance of island–mainland connectivity, future tribal and federal collaboration will be important to maintain a genetically and demographically viable population of black bears.
{"title":"The structure and connectivity of an archipelagic population of black bears","authors":"Monica R. Cooper, Andrew Edwards, Julie Van Stappen, Ronald Nordin, Dylan Jennings, Jonathan N. Pauli","doi":"10.1007/s10592-024-01638-2","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10592-024-01638-2","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Understanding factors that influence the viability of populations is central to conservation biology. Small and isolated populations have elevated risk of extinction due to demographic and genetic stochasticity. The Apostle Islands National Lakeshore features a genetically unique and culturally important population of archipelagic black bears (<i>Makwa; Ursus americanus</i>). While dispersal is central to population viability, previous studies of this population did not sample the adjacent mainland black bear population on the Red Cliff Reservation (<i>Gaa-miskwaabikaang</i>). Therefore, we lack robust estimates of dispersal, gene flow and overall connectivity among the islands and with the mainland population. In partnership with Red Cliff Band of Lake Superior Chippewa and the National Park Service, we non-invasively collected black bear hair, and used 17 microsatellite markers to genotype 141 black bears. We then estimated genetic diversity, population structure, dispersal, and conducted a pedigree network analysis to identify areas of the archipelago important for connectivity and reproduction. We found evidence of a well-connected archipelagic bear population structured into five clusters and characterized by moderate dispersal between islands and mainland. We found that three of the islands are disproportionately important for genetically connecting the archipelago, but the islands were nevertheless reliant upon the mainland for gene flow and genetic diversity. The high connectivity between islands and the mainland demonstrates a potential metapopulation dynamic, where islands may serve as a reservoir of individuals for the mainland and the mainland supplying individuals likely important for maintaining genetic diversity of island populations. Given the importance of island–mainland connectivity, future tribal and federal collaboration will be important to maintain a genetically and demographically viable population of black bears.</p>","PeriodicalId":55212,"journal":{"name":"Conservation Genetics","volume":"175 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2024-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142208226","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-09-02DOI: 10.1007/s10592-024-01637-3
Ruth L. Palsson, Ian R. H. Telford, Jeremy J. Bruhl, Rose L. Andrew
Integrating molecular data is essential for clarifying the distributions and genetic structures of species that have histories of misidentification and misapplication of names. There has been confusion about the species limits of the Vulnerable Prostanthera cineolifera with respect to morphologically similar specimens in the Hunter Valley, New South Wales, Australia and morphologically dissimilar specimens in the Lower Hawkesbury Valley, New South Wales, and from north-eastern New South Wales. To test the species limits of P. cineolifera, and related taxa, specimens were collected from across the range and augmented with herbarium specimens. We used morphometric analysis of 18 morphological characters across 51 samples. Using the DArTseq reduced representation sequencing platform, 4010 single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) across 110 individuals were recovered for molecular analysis. Both morphological and molecular analyses produced three concordant clusters (A) P. cineolifera, (B) a group sharing similarities with P. sp. Hawkesbury (B.J.Conn 2591), and (C) a group allied with P.lanceolata and P. ovalifolia. These results indicate that the specimens form north-eastern New South Wales are more likely to be P. lanceolata, not P. cineolifera, and that specimens from the Lower Hawkesbury are of an undescribed species with the phrase name P. sp. Hawkesbury (B.J.Conn 2591). Within P. cineolifera there was pronounced genetic differentiation among populations. Little evidence of inbreeding was observed, but the newly recognised, more isolated populations had the lowest genetic diversity. This study provides new information about the range of the species and its genetic structure that informs the conservation priorities for this species.
分子数据的整合对于弄清物种的分布和遗传结构至关重要,因为这些物种曾被误认和误用名称。澳大利亚新南威尔士州猎人谷的形态相似标本与新南威尔士州下霍克斯伯里谷和新南威尔士州东北部的形态相异标本在易危的Prostanthera cineolifera的物种界限方面一直存在混淆。为了测试 P. cineolifera 及相关类群的种限,我们从整个分布区采集了标本,并用标本馆标本进行了补充。我们对 51 个样本的 18 个形态特征进行了形态计量分析。利用 DArTseq 简化表示测序平台,对 110 个个体的 4010 个单核苷酸多态性(SNPs)进行了分子分析。形态学和分子分析均得出了三个一致的群组(A)P. cineolifera,(B)与 P. sp. Hawkesbury(B.J.Conn 2591)相似的群组,以及(C)与 P. lanceolata 和 P. ovalifolia 相似的群组。这些结果表明,新南威尔士州东北部的标本更有可能是 P. lanceolata,而不是 P. cineolifera,下霍克斯伯里的标本属于一个未描述的物种,其短语名称为 P. sp. Hawkesbury(B.J.Conn 2591)。在 P. cineolifera 中,不同种群之间存在明显的遗传分化。近亲繁殖的证据很少,但新发现的、较为孤立的种群遗传多样性最低。这项研究提供了有关该物种分布范围及其遗传结构的新信息,为该物种的保护重点提供了参考。
{"title":"Population genetic structure and range limits of Prostanthera cineolifera (Lamiaceae), a vulnerable shrub with a patchy distribution","authors":"Ruth L. Palsson, Ian R. H. Telford, Jeremy J. Bruhl, Rose L. Andrew","doi":"10.1007/s10592-024-01637-3","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10592-024-01637-3","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Integrating molecular data is essential for clarifying the distributions and genetic structures of species that have histories of misidentification and misapplication of names. There has been confusion about the species limits of the Vulnerable <i>Prostanthera cineolifera</i> with respect to morphologically similar specimens in the Hunter Valley, New South Wales, Australia and morphologically dissimilar specimens in the Lower Hawkesbury Valley, New South Wales, and from north-eastern New South Wales. To test the species limits of <i>P. cineolifera,</i> and related taxa, specimens were collected from across the range and augmented with herbarium specimens. We used morphometric analysis of 18 morphological characters across 51 samples. Using the DArTseq reduced representation sequencing platform, 4010 single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) across 110 individuals were recovered for molecular analysis. Both morphological and molecular analyses produced three concordant clusters (A) <i>P. cineolifera</i>, (B) a group sharing similarities with <i>P</i>. sp. Hawkesbury (B.J.Conn 2591), and (C) a group allied with <i>P.</i> <i>lanceolata</i> and <i>P. ovalifolia</i>. These results indicate that the specimens form north-eastern New South Wales are more likely to be <i>P. lanceolata</i>, not <i>P. cineolifera</i>, and that specimens from the Lower Hawkesbury are of an undescribed species with the phrase name <i>P</i>. sp. Hawkesbury (B.J.Conn 2591). Within <i>P. cineolifera</i> there was pronounced genetic differentiation among populations. Little evidence of inbreeding was observed, but the newly recognised, more isolated populations had the lowest genetic diversity. This study provides new information about the range of the species and its genetic structure that informs the conservation priorities for this species.</p>","PeriodicalId":55212,"journal":{"name":"Conservation Genetics","volume":"16 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2024-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142208227","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-08-24DOI: 10.1007/s10592-024-01630-w
Reeta Sharma, Rahul De, Jean-Philippe Puyravaud, Jyotirmayee Parida, A. Sedhupathy, Tamanna Kalam, Abdul Rahim, K. Muthamizh Selvan, N. Arumugam, S. P. Goyal, Priya Davidar
The Peninsular Indian population of the endangered Asian elephant occurs in the Western and Eastern Ghats, and further north-east in the Eastern Central Indian (ECI) range. Using DNA obtained from fresh elephant dung, this study assessed the genetic variation, population structure, and gene flow in the two southern populations, SI1 and SI2, separated by the Palghat Gap in the Western Ghats, and the third population in the ECI range. As these populations have been shown to be genetically associated in previous studies, the hypotheses that their combined genetic diversity would be high and gene flow via migration would be evident, were tested. A total of 379 elephants were genotyped at 10 microsatellite markers, and a 630 bp mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) fragment from the D-loop region was sequenced from 33 individuals. Four previously documented mtDNA haplotypes were identified: SI1 and ECI each had a single haplotype (BN and BL, respectively), while SI2 had two haplotypes (BA and BF). The mtDNA markers indicated substantial genetic differentiation among the populations, while differentiation using microsatellite data was moderate. The populations were assigned to three genetic groups: SI1, SI2, and the ECI. However, 39% of these individuals showed mixed ancestry, indicating ongoing gene flow despite natural and human-made barriers. Several first-generation male migrants were identified providing further evidence of contemporary gene flow. The sex ratio was female-biased, which is consistent with the existing census data. These three populations should be managed as a single conservation unit to ensure their long term viability.
{"title":"Patterns of genetic diversity, gene flow and genetic structure of three Peninsular Indian elephant populations indicate population connectivity","authors":"Reeta Sharma, Rahul De, Jean-Philippe Puyravaud, Jyotirmayee Parida, A. Sedhupathy, Tamanna Kalam, Abdul Rahim, K. Muthamizh Selvan, N. Arumugam, S. P. Goyal, Priya Davidar","doi":"10.1007/s10592-024-01630-w","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10592-024-01630-w","url":null,"abstract":"<p>The Peninsular Indian population of the endangered Asian elephant occurs in the Western and Eastern Ghats, and further north-east in the Eastern Central Indian (ECI) range. Using DNA obtained from fresh elephant dung, this study assessed the genetic variation, population structure, and gene flow in the two southern populations, SI1 and SI2, separated by the Palghat Gap in the Western Ghats, and the third population in the ECI range. As these populations have been shown to be genetically associated in previous studies, the hypotheses that their combined genetic diversity would be high and gene flow via migration would be evident, were tested. A total of 379 elephants were genotyped at 10 microsatellite markers, and a 630 bp mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) fragment from the D-loop region was sequenced from 33 individuals. Four previously documented mtDNA haplotypes were identified: SI1 and ECI each had a single haplotype (BN and BL, respectively), while SI2 had two haplotypes (BA and BF). The mtDNA markers indicated substantial genetic differentiation among the populations, while differentiation using microsatellite data was moderate. The populations were assigned to three genetic groups: SI1, SI2, and the ECI. However, 39% of these individuals showed mixed ancestry, indicating ongoing gene flow despite natural and human-made barriers. Several first-generation male migrants were identified providing further evidence of contemporary gene flow. The sex ratio was female-biased, which is consistent with the existing census data. These three populations should be managed as a single conservation unit to ensure their long term viability.</p>","PeriodicalId":55212,"journal":{"name":"Conservation Genetics","volume":"22 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2024-08-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142208228","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
In this era of global warming, southwestern Shikoku is a strong candidate as a refugium for tropical reef corals in the Pacific. In this study, we documented patterns of species composition among pocilloporid recruits, the dominant coral family being recruited to southern Shikoku, and we evaluated genetic population relationships between recruits and adults at four sites, using seven nuclear microsatellite markers. Pocilloporid recruits in the area comprised two genera and three species, including the most heavily recruited species, Pocillopora damicornis, and the minor P. acuta. This is the first observation of the latter species in this area. In P. damicornis, clonality differed among the four sites and clonal recruits were observed at two sites. However, proportions of clones were relatively low. Strong genetic differentiation among the four sites was observed in populations of P. damicornis, although three genetic clusters were shared among these sites. In addition, compositions of these three clusters were similar between recruits and adults at each site. This indicates that populations of P. damicornis in southwestern Shikoku are maintained primarily by sexual reproduction and that larvae derived from sexual reproduction are supplied mainly from their natal habitats at all sites. As local population persistence and self-recruitment are important to maintain populations of this species in southwestern Shikoku, conservation efforts should be directed at protecting extant local populations.
在全球变暖的时代,四国西南部是太平洋热带珊瑚礁的理想避难所。在这项研究中,我们记录了四国西南部主要珊瑚科--稚珊瑚属(pocilloporid)新秀的物种组成模式,并利用七个核微卫星标记评估了四个地点的新秀和成体之间的遗传种群关系。该地区的稚珊瑚新成员包括两个属和三个种,其中包括新成员数量最多的种 Pocillopora damicornis 和次要的 P. acuta。这是在该地区首次观察到后一物种。在 P. damicornis 中,四个地点的克隆性各不相同,在两个地点观察到了克隆新生物。不过,克隆比例相对较低。在四个地点观察到的 P. damicornis 种群之间存在强烈的遗传分化,尽管这些地点之间共享三个遗传集群。此外,这三个基因群的组成在每个地点的幼体和成体中都很相似。这表明,四国西南部的大角鲈种群主要通过有性生殖维持,有性生殖产生的幼虫主要由各地点的原生地提供。由于本地种群的持续性和自我繁殖对维持该物种在四国西南部的种群数量非常重要,因此保护工作应着眼于保护现存的本地种群。
{"title":"Population genetic structures of newly recruited and adult populations of pocilloporid corals in southwestern Shikoku, Japan","authors":"Satoru Sano, Yuichi Nakajima, Takuma Mezaki, Satoshi Mitarai, Masako Nakamura","doi":"10.1007/s10592-024-01634-6","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10592-024-01634-6","url":null,"abstract":"<p>In this era of global warming, southwestern Shikoku is a strong candidate as a refugium for tropical reef corals in the Pacific. In this study, we documented patterns of species composition among pocilloporid recruits, the dominant coral family being recruited to southern Shikoku, and we evaluated genetic population relationships between recruits and adults at four sites, using seven nuclear microsatellite markers. Pocilloporid recruits in the area comprised two genera and three species, including the most heavily recruited species, <i>Pocillopora damicornis</i>, and the minor <i>P. acuta</i>. This is the first observation of the latter species in this area. In <i>P. damicornis</i>, clonality differed among the four sites and clonal recruits were observed at two sites. However, proportions of clones were relatively low. Strong genetic differentiation among the four sites was observed in populations of <i>P. damicornis</i>, although three genetic clusters were shared among these sites. In addition, compositions of these three clusters were similar between recruits and adults at each site. This indicates that populations of <i>P. damicornis</i> in southwestern Shikoku are maintained primarily by sexual reproduction and that larvae derived from sexual reproduction are supplied mainly from their natal habitats at all sites. As local population persistence and self-recruitment are important to maintain populations of this species in southwestern Shikoku, conservation efforts should be directed at protecting extant local populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":55212,"journal":{"name":"Conservation Genetics","volume":"34 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2024-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142226598","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-08-21DOI: 10.1007/s10592-024-01632-8
Sean Hoban, Ivan Paz-Vinas, Robyn E. Shaw, Luis Castillo-Reina, Jessica M. D. A. Silva, J. Andrew DeWoody, Robert Ekblom, Ancuta Fedorca, Brenna R. Forester, W. Chris Funk, Julia C. Geue, Myriam Heuertz, Peter M. Hollingsworth, Alice C. Hughes, Margaret E. Hunter, Christina Hvilsom, Fumiko Ishihama, Rebecca Jordan, Belma Kalamujić Stroil, Francine Kershaw, Colin K. Khoury, Viktoria Köppä, Linda Laikre, Anna J. Macdonald, Alicia Mastretta-Yanes, Mariah H. Meek, Joachim Mergeay, Katie L. Millette, David O’Brien, Victor J. Rincón-Parra, M. Alejandra Rodríguez-Morales, Meredith C. Schuman, Gernot Segelbacher, Paul Sunnucks, Rebecca S. Taylor, Henrik Thurfjell, Cristiano Vernesi, Catherine E. Grueber
Genetic diversity is essential for maintaining healthy populations and ecosystems. Several approaches have recently been developed to evaluate population genetic trends without necessarily collecting new genetic data. Such “genetic diversity indicators” enable rapid, large-scale evaluation across dozens to thousands of species. Empirical genetic studies, when available, provide detailed information that is important for management, such as estimates of gene flow, inbreeding, genetic erosion and adaptation. In this article, we argue that the development and advancement of genetic diversity indicators is a complementary approach to genetic studies in conservation biology, but not a substitute. Genetic diversity indicators and empirical genetic data can provide different information for conserving genetic diversity. Genetic diversity indicators enable affordable tracking, reporting, prioritization and communication, although, being proxies, do not provide comprehensive evaluation of the genetic status of a species. Conversely, genetic methods offer detailed analysis of the genetic status of a given species or population, although they remain challenging to implement for most species globally, given current capacity and resourcing. We conclude that indicators and genetic studies are both important for genetic conservation actions and recommend they be used in combination for conserving and monitoring genetic diversity.
{"title":"DNA-based studies and genetic diversity indicator assessments are complementary approaches to conserving evolutionary potential","authors":"Sean Hoban, Ivan Paz-Vinas, Robyn E. Shaw, Luis Castillo-Reina, Jessica M. D. A. Silva, J. Andrew DeWoody, Robert Ekblom, Ancuta Fedorca, Brenna R. Forester, W. Chris Funk, Julia C. Geue, Myriam Heuertz, Peter M. Hollingsworth, Alice C. Hughes, Margaret E. Hunter, Christina Hvilsom, Fumiko Ishihama, Rebecca Jordan, Belma Kalamujić Stroil, Francine Kershaw, Colin K. Khoury, Viktoria Köppä, Linda Laikre, Anna J. Macdonald, Alicia Mastretta-Yanes, Mariah H. Meek, Joachim Mergeay, Katie L. Millette, David O’Brien, Victor J. Rincón-Parra, M. Alejandra Rodríguez-Morales, Meredith C. Schuman, Gernot Segelbacher, Paul Sunnucks, Rebecca S. Taylor, Henrik Thurfjell, Cristiano Vernesi, Catherine E. Grueber","doi":"10.1007/s10592-024-01632-8","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10592-024-01632-8","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Genetic diversity is essential for maintaining healthy populations and ecosystems. Several approaches have recently been developed to evaluate population genetic trends without necessarily collecting new genetic data. Such “genetic diversity indicators” enable rapid, large-scale evaluation across dozens to thousands of species. Empirical genetic studies, when available, provide detailed information that is important for management, such as estimates of gene flow, inbreeding, genetic erosion and adaptation. In this article, we argue that the development and advancement of genetic diversity indicators is a complementary approach to genetic studies in conservation biology, but not a substitute. Genetic diversity indicators and empirical genetic data can provide different information for conserving genetic diversity. Genetic diversity indicators enable affordable tracking, reporting, prioritization and communication, although, being proxies, do not provide comprehensive evaluation of the genetic status of a species. Conversely, genetic methods offer detailed analysis of the genetic status of a given species or population, although they remain challenging to implement for most species globally, given current capacity and resourcing. We conclude that indicators and genetic studies are both important for genetic conservation actions and recommend they be used in combination for conserving and monitoring genetic diversity.</p>","PeriodicalId":55212,"journal":{"name":"Conservation Genetics","volume":"58 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2024-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142208229","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}