Australasian Journal on Ageing最新文献

Objective: To investigate changes in well-being measures for older Māori after moving from community to long-term care (LTC).

Methods: We undertook a retrospective cohort study of older Māori in New Zealand (NZ) who had received assessments for their health needs whilst living at home (interRAI-HC assessment) as well as a subsequent assessment after moving into a care facility (interRAI-LTCF). All interRAI-HC assessments from 01 July 2013 to 21 December 2018 were identified and matched to LTCF assessments that were undertaken at least 6 months later. Odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated to determine the difference in proportion of variables of interest (indicative of movement, socialising, sleep and nutrition, alongside general physical and mental health status) between participants' HC and subsequent LTCF assessments.

Results: Changes in well-being measures were investigated among 1531 Māori (mean age 76.2 years, 61% female). Odds of having a fall (OR: 0.40 [95% CI 0.34, 0.48]), being lonely (OR: 0.13 [95% CI 0.09, 0.18]), sleeping difficulty (OR: 0.74 [95% CI 0.60, 0.91]) and fatigue (OR: 0.18 [95% CI 0.14, 0.23]) reduced on moving to LTC. However, the presence of depression (OR 3.96 [95% CI 2.58, 6.09]) and dependence with locomotion (OR 1.56 [95% CI 1.23, 1.97]) significantly increased when moving from home to LTC.

Conclusion: Despite some indicators of functional and health-related decline, significant improvements are also apparent across multiple domains of well-being. Further investigation of resident and family perceptions of well-being in association with a move to LTC is warranted.

Objective: This study aimed to identify independent perioperative risk factors and follow-up mortality associated with postoperative delirium in older patients undergoing hip arthroplasty at a large teaching hospital in South China. We aimed to establish a specialised model to predict the risk of postoperative delirium.

Methods: This retrospective observational study was conducted in the orthopaedics department of the hospital between January 2018 and December 2022. Participants were stratified into two groups: those with and those without postoperative delirium. The study included demographics, clinical characteristics, surgery-related and laboratory specifics, as well as details on delirium.

Results: In this study of 241 participants, the median age was 80 years (IQR, 74.5-85), with postoperative delirium observed in 43 individuals (18%). Multivariate logistic regression analysis identified age (OR, 1.07; 95% CI, 1.01-1.14; p = .03), arrhythmia (OR, 7.97; 95% CI, 2.25-28.29; p = .001), dementia (OR, 7.08; 95% CI, 1.73-28.95; p = .006) and a lower level of red blood cells (RBC) (OR, .33; 95% CI, .17-.64; p < .001) as independent factors associated with postoperative delirium after hip arthroplasty. Patients experiencing both preoperative and postoperative delirium had significantly higher follow-up mortality compared to those with postoperative delirium only and those without delirium (80% vs. 38% vs. 24%, p = .02).

Conclusions: The specialised model was established to effectively predict delirium following hip arthroplasty in patients with femoral neck fracture. Postoperative delirium strongly associates with follow-up mortality. Proactive management is crucial for minimising delirium occurrence after hip arthroplasty and improving patient outcomes.

Objective: Acquired hearing loss (HL) in adult life is one of the most prevalent health conditions and is associated with several chronic diseases. Hearing loss can lead to reduced social activity and individuals' perceptions of supportiveness within social networks. This study explored the effects of corrected vs. uncorrected hearing loss on social support, social isolation, anxiety and depression.

Methods: We undertook a cross-sectional study. An online survey was completed by 7442 Australian residents aged 50 years or older as part of the Island Study Linking Ageing and Neurodegenerative Disease (ISLAND). Respondents were grouped into those with no reported acquired HL, those with corrected HL (managed with hearing aids and other listening devices) and those with uncorrected HL.

Results: Hearing loss was reported by 1274 participants (17%). Compared to male participants, there was a higher proportion of female participants in the No-HL group (25% male, 75% female). Compared to participants with corrected or no-HL, those with HL (n = 548, 7%) reported significantly smaller (p = .007) and less supportive social networks (p = .001), higher self-reported anxiety (p < .001) and depression (p < .001) symptoms. Depression scores were significantly higher in those with HL-corrected than No-HL (SMD = .10, p = .04).

Conclusions: Uncorrected HL was associated with poor mental health and social isolation, compounding the risk of dementia. Correcting for HL appeared to mitigate these outcomes, except for depression. Longitudinal studies are needed to track the effects of HL correction over time. Hearing status needs to be assessed when people present with mental health concerns, so health professionals can make appropriate referrals and provide relevant advice and support.

Introduction: Those aged 80 years and over are the fastest-growing sector of the Australian population but are often excluded from research. Oldest old people living alone, in disadvantaged neighbourhoods, and with ill health or dementia, face additional barriers that may hinder their participation in research.

Methods: This paper contributes timely critical commentary on methodological and ethical approaches to engaging under-represented people in research. We draw on our experiences and reflections from a study of social exclusion of people aged 80 years and older living alone in government housing in Melbourne, Australia.

Results and discussion: We suggest key factors to facilitate representation of this population group in future research. These factors include using doorknocking to gain access, cultivating trust with participants and gatekeepers, and conducting face-to-face home interviews. We also interrogate ethical and safety issues for researchers and oldest old participants including the potential for informed consent protocols to exclude this population group.

Conclusion: To avoid unintentionally excluding the oldest old, researchers need to consider older persons' self-determination and advocate for methods that ensure oldest old perspectives inform future healthy ageing planning and reduce possible health and well-being inequities.

Objective: Carers for people with dementia commonly experience difficulty assisting the care-recipients with their daily activities and may adopt specific strategies to decrease the difficulties experienced. The objective of this qualitative study was to explore and understand the strategies used by carers to assist with daily activities for persons living with dementia.

Methods: Individual semi-structured interviews via face-to-face or telephone mode were conducted with 62 carers of persons living with dementia in Australia. Carers were asked about the strategies they have used previously, or are currently using, to assist with daily activity completion. Data were analysed via constant comparison and thematic analysis.

Results: All carers reported the need for strategies to accommodate the varying behaviour and functioning of the care-recipients. Participants reported a total of 207 strategies that fell into four main categories: (i) engage; (ii) adapt; (iii) orientate; and (iv) sense. The most used strategies were reported as those aimed at adapting the activity by using equipment to facilitate completion.

Conclusions: Carers help persons living with dementia complete their daily activities by developing their own strategies based on the care-recipients' needs and personal preferences through a trial-and-error process. Carers can benefit if more advice is provided to them by health/social care professionals regarding what strategies may be helpful. Further studies are needed to develop these strategies into an educational package so that carers can be guided to use these strategies appropriately.

Objectives: Depression is common amongst Australian residential aged care services (RACS) residents. This study aimed to estimate the risk of depression amongst residents and identify factors associated with this risk. In care settings such as RACS, time-efficient screening tools to identify depression risk may be a preferred tool.

Methods: The two-item Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-2), derived from the nine-item PHQ-9 used commonly in the United States (US), was employed in this study. A resident was identified as being at risk of depression where the score was ≥3. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to identify independent factors associated with being at risk of depression.

Results: Residents' mean age was 87.7 (standard deviation: 7.3) years and 73% were female. One-fifth of residents (n = 108 or 20%) were at risk of depression. Age (odds ratio [OR] 0.96, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.93-0.99); Pain Assessment in Advanced Dementia (PAINAD) score (OR 1.55, 95% CI 1.11-2.16); Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) score (OR 1.08, 95% CI 1.03-1.13); and 38-item Frailty Index (FI) score (OR 1.07, 95% CI 1.03-1.10) were significantly associated with being at risk of depression, whilst sex, urinary incontinence, polypharmacy, Dementia Severity Rating Scale (DSRS) and Nursing Home Life Space Diameter (NHLSD) score were not.

Conclusions: One in five residents were at risk of depression. Younger age, higher pain, higher daytime sleepiness and higher frailty status were associated with depressive risk. Future studies focusing on interventions targeting these factors may contribute to improved health outcomes.

Objective: To construct a standardised, consensus-guided minimum clinical dataset (MCDS) for preoperative comprehensive geriatric assessment and optimisation (CGA) in Australia and Aotearoa New Zealand.

Methods: We conducted a review of the international perioperative literature to identify CGA domains and tools for potential inclusion in the MCDS. We invited members of the Australian and New Zealand Society for Geriatric Medicine to participate in a Delphi study to obtain consensus on MCDS tools. Participants were asked to rate proposed tools using Likert scales (when >2 tools) or make a binary choice between two proposed tools. Consensus was considered to be achieved when there was at least 75% concordance between the two rounds amongst the participants, and at least one variable attaining over 50% of participants' votes. Domains that did not achieve consensus in Round 1 were carried over to Round 2.

Results: There were 73 participants in Round 1 of the Delphi study and 47 participants in Round 2. Consensus was achieved on tool/s recommended for every MCDS domain: Clinical Frailty Scale (frailty); sMMSE, RUDAS, MoCA (cognition); 4AT (delirium); timed-up-and-go (physical function); GDS-15 (mood); Barthel Index (functional status); and MUST (malnutrition).

Conclusions: We recommend clinicians delivering preoperative CGA consider the use of the MCDS we have constructed when assessing older people contemplating surgery, as part of a multicomponent and multidisciplinary approach to optimising perioperative outcomes.

Frailty is an important concept in the care of older adults. Over the past two decades, significant advances have been made in measuring frailty. While it is now well-recognised that frailty status is an important determinant of outcomes from medical illnesses or surgical interventions, frailty measurement is not currently routinely integrated into clinical practice. In the community setting, it is uncommon for general practitioners to deliver frailty-optimised care. In hospitals, there is substantial variability in how people living with frailty are managed. This variability is notable between and even within disciplines. Furthermore, gains from understanding frailty mechanisms and risk factors are not yet applied/implemented at scale to delay the progression of frailty in community-dwellers. The Australian Frailty Network (AFN) is a national collaborative group of researchers, clinicians, non-government organisations, consumers and policymakers, in which the engagement and active involvement of consumers has been embedded from the outset. The AFN aims to generate new knowledge to improve health outcomes, to ensure evidence-based management is translated into clinical practice and to build capacity in multidisciplinary and translational frailty research. Here, we describe the development of the AFN, highlighting important milestones: (i) securing funding for the network and flagship elements; (ii) an inaugural summit to establish the strategic vision, values and scope with end-users; (iii) sabbatical visits to learn from international examples; and (iv) developing the governance structure and an actionable plan encompassing consumer engagement, research, education and policy and practice to maximise impact.