Pediatric surgeons face substantial administrative workload. Large language models (LLMs) may streamline documentation, family communication, rapid reference, and education, but raise concerns about accuracy, bias, and privacy. This review summarizes practical, near-term uses with clinician oversight.Narrative review of LLMs in pediatric surgical workflows and scholarly writing. Sources included MEDLINE/PubMed, Scopus, Embase, Google Scholar, and policy documents (WHO, FDA, EU). Searches spanned January 2015 to August 2025, English only. Peer-reviewed and multicenter studies were prioritized; selected high-signal preprints were labeled. Data screening and extraction were performed by the author; findings were synthesized qualitatively.Across studies, LLMs reduced drafting time for discharge letters and operative note registries while maintaining clinician-rated quality; they improved readability of consent forms and postoperative instructions and supported patient education. For decision support, general models performed well on structured medical questions, with stronger results when grounded by retrieval. Common limits included coding performance, case-nuance/temporal reasoning, variable translation outside high-resource languages, and citation fabrication without curated sources. Privacy risks stemmed from logging, rare-string memorization, and poorly scoped tool connections. Recommended controls included a clinician-in-the-loop "review and release" workflow, privacy-preserving deployments, version pinning, and ongoing monitoring aligned with early-evaluation guidance.When outputs are grounded in structured EHR data or curated retrieval and briefly reviewed by clinicians, LLMs can responsibly reduce administrative burden and support communication and education. Early adoption should target high-volume, low-risk, auditable tasks. Future priorities must include multicenter pediatric datasets, transparent benchmarks (accuracy, calibration, equity, time saved), and prospective studies linked to safety outcomes.
{"title":"The Pediatric Surgeon's AI Toolbox: How Large Language Models Like ChatGPT Are Simplifying Practice and Expanding Global Access.","authors":"Carlos Andres Colunga Tinajero","doi":"10.1055/a-2722-3871","DOIUrl":"10.1055/a-2722-3871","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Pediatric surgeons face substantial administrative workload. Large language models (LLMs) may streamline documentation, family communication, rapid reference, and education, but raise concerns about accuracy, bias, and privacy. This review summarizes practical, near-term uses with clinician oversight.Narrative review of LLMs in pediatric surgical workflows and scholarly writing. Sources included MEDLINE/PubMed, Scopus, Embase, Google Scholar, and policy documents (WHO, FDA, EU). Searches spanned January 2015 to August 2025, English only. Peer-reviewed and multicenter studies were prioritized; selected high-signal preprints were labeled. Data screening and extraction were performed by the author; findings were synthesized qualitatively.Across studies, LLMs reduced drafting time for discharge letters and operative note registries while maintaining clinician-rated quality; they improved readability of consent forms and postoperative instructions and supported patient education. For decision support, general models performed well on structured medical questions, with stronger results when grounded by retrieval. Common limits included coding performance, case-nuance/temporal reasoning, variable translation outside high-resource languages, and citation fabrication without curated sources. Privacy risks stemmed from logging, rare-string memorization, and poorly scoped tool connections. Recommended controls included a clinician-in-the-loop \"review and release\" workflow, privacy-preserving deployments, version pinning, and ongoing monitoring aligned with early-evaluation guidance.When outputs are grounded in structured EHR data or curated retrieval and briefly reviewed by clinicians, LLMs can responsibly reduce administrative burden and support communication and education. Early adoption should target high-volume, low-risk, auditable tasks. Future priorities must include multicenter pediatric datasets, transparent benchmarks (accuracy, calibration, equity, time saved), and prospective studies linked to safety outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":56316,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Pediatric Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2025-11-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145294499","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Ciro Esposito, Claudia Di Mento, Fulvia Del Conte, Francesco Tedesco, Roberta Guglielmini, Giovanni Esposito, Maria Escolino
Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly integrated into surgical practice, offering enhanced decision-making, precision, and workflow efficiency. In pediatric surgery, the convergence of AI and robotic-assisted platforms represents a promising frontier, addressing the unique anatomical, physiological, and technical challenges of operating on children. Aim of this review is to provide an overview of the current state of art of AI use in pediatric robotic-assisted surgery (RAS), outlining the available evidence, potential benefits, existing limitations, and prospective developments.A literature-based search of PubMed and Scopus was performed to identify articles covering any aspect of AI application in pediatric RAS. Selection criteria included English language, pediatric patients (under 18 years of age), and AI application to pediatric RAS. Additionally, studies reporting AI applications in adult RAS or for surgical training, which were not primarily focused on pediatric surgery but presented potential translational applicability to pediatric RAS, were considered.A total of 746 papers published until July 2025 were collected. A total of 15 full-text articles were assessed for eligibility, meeting the inclusion criteria. The other studies were excluded because they did not address pediatric surgery, did not involve robotic-assisted procedures, or did not include applications of AI.Although RAS is well established in pediatric practice, the direct application of AI remains limited, with AI-like features such as machine vision and augmented reality serving mainly as supportive tools rather than autonomous decision-making systems. Nevertheless, emerging AI-like technologies and ongoing research hold promising potential for future applications in pediatric robotic surgery.
{"title":"AI in Robotic-assisted Pediatric Surgery: Current Applications and Future Directions.","authors":"Ciro Esposito, Claudia Di Mento, Fulvia Del Conte, Francesco Tedesco, Roberta Guglielmini, Giovanni Esposito, Maria Escolino","doi":"10.1055/a-2722-3348","DOIUrl":"10.1055/a-2722-3348","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly integrated into surgical practice, offering enhanced decision-making, precision, and workflow efficiency. In pediatric surgery, the convergence of AI and robotic-assisted platforms represents a promising frontier, addressing the unique anatomical, physiological, and technical challenges of operating on children. Aim of this review is to provide an overview of the current state of art of AI use in pediatric robotic-assisted surgery (RAS), outlining the available evidence, potential benefits, existing limitations, and prospective developments.A literature-based search of PubMed and Scopus was performed to identify articles covering any aspect of AI application in pediatric RAS. Selection criteria included English language, pediatric patients (under 18 years of age), and AI application to pediatric RAS. Additionally, studies reporting AI applications in adult RAS or for surgical training, which were not primarily focused on pediatric surgery but presented potential translational applicability to pediatric RAS, were considered.A total of 746 papers published until July 2025 were collected. A total of 15 full-text articles were assessed for eligibility, meeting the inclusion criteria. The other studies were excluded because they did not address pediatric surgery, did not involve robotic-assisted procedures, or did not include applications of AI.Although RAS is well established in pediatric practice, the direct application of AI remains limited, with AI-like features such as machine vision and augmented reality serving mainly as supportive tools rather than autonomous decision-making systems. Nevertheless, emerging AI-like technologies and ongoing research hold promising potential for future applications in pediatric robotic surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":56316,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Pediatric Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2025-10-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145294416","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Tutku Soyer, Federica Pederiva, Paolo Dalena, Luca Pio, Mohit Kakar, Nigel J Hall, Francesco Morini
Although VACTERL association is a recognized entity in patients with esophageal atresia (EA), its impact on surgical outcomes remains unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the influence of VACTERL association and chromosomal anomalies (VACTERL-CA) on the surgical outcomes of EA patients, offering novel insights into risk stratification.All patients enrolled in the European Pediatric Surgeons' Association (EUPSA) Esophageal Atresia Registry (EAR) between July 2014 and December 2017 were included. Patients were classified into two groups: those with VACTERL-CA and those without these anomalies (non-VACTERL). Groups were compared for demographics, associated malformations, surgical approach, complications, and outcomes.Among 372 patients, 22% (n = 82) were classified as VACTERL-CA. This group had significantly lower gestational age (35.9 weeks vs. 37.1 weeks, p = 0.004), birth weight (2,312 g vs. 2,663 g, p < 0.001), and APGAR scores at 5 and 10 minutes (p = 0.005). Surgical strategies, including rates of primary anastomosis (88% in both groups), did not differ. Anastomotic leak and stricture rates were similar; however, recurrent fistula was more common in VACTERL-CA (4.9% vs. 1.0%, p = 0.023). Overall mortality was higher in VACTERL-CA (14.6% vs. 5.2%, p = 0.003), largely due to associated anomalies such as cardiac or neurologic conditions, whereas EA-related mortality was more frequent in non-VACTERL (1% vs. 0%). Sepsis was also more frequent in VACTERL-CA (10.9% vs. 4.5%, p = 0.033). In multivariate analysis, low birth weight (adjusted odds ratios [aOR]: 0.95 per 100 g, p = 0.010) and cardiac malformations (aOR: 2.33, p = 0.002) were independently associated with VACTERL-CA.EA patients with VACTERL-CA represent a high-risk subgroup characterized by prematurity, major cardiac defects, and increased sepsis risk. These findings highlight the need for early cardiac screening, standardized infection-prevention bundles, and tailored multidisciplinary care to improve survival and reduce preventable complications.
目的:尽管VACTERL关联在食管闭锁(EA)患者中是一个公认的实体,但其对手术结果的影响尚不清楚。本研究旨在评估VACTERL关联和染色体异常(VACTERL- ca)对EA患者手术结果的影响,为风险分层提供新的见解。方法:纳入2014年7月至2017年12月期间在欧洲儿科外科医生协会(EUPSA)食管闭锁登记处(EAR)登记的所有患者。患者分为两组:有VACTERL关联和/或染色体异常的(VACTERL- ca)和没有这些异常的(Non-VACTERL)。比较各组的人口统计学、相关畸形、手术入路、并发症和结局。结果:372例患者中,22% (n=82)被分类为VACTERL-CA。该组的胎龄(35.9周vs. 37.1周,p=0.004)和出生体重(2312 g vs. 2663 g)均显著降低。结论:EA患者VACTERL-CA是一个以早产、主要心脏缺陷和脓毒症风险增加为特征的高风险亚组。这些发现强调了早期心脏筛查、标准化感染预防包和量身定制的多学科护理的必要性,以提高生存率并减少可预防的并发症。
{"title":"Impact of VACTERL Association and Chromosomal Anomalies on Outcomes After Esophageal Atresia Repair: Insights from the EUPSA Registry.","authors":"Tutku Soyer, Federica Pederiva, Paolo Dalena, Luca Pio, Mohit Kakar, Nigel J Hall, Francesco Morini","doi":"10.1055/a-2708-2852","DOIUrl":"10.1055/a-2708-2852","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Although VACTERL association is a recognized entity in patients with esophageal atresia (EA), its impact on surgical outcomes remains unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the influence of VACTERL association and chromosomal anomalies (VACTERL-CA) on the surgical outcomes of EA patients, offering novel insights into risk stratification.All patients enrolled in the European Pediatric Surgeons' Association (EUPSA) Esophageal Atresia Registry (EAR) between July 2014 and December 2017 were included. Patients were classified into two groups: those with VACTERL-CA and those without these anomalies (non-VACTERL). Groups were compared for demographics, associated malformations, surgical approach, complications, and outcomes.Among 372 patients, 22% (<i>n</i> = 82) were classified as VACTERL-CA. This group had significantly lower gestational age (35.9 weeks vs. 37.1 weeks, <i>p</i> = 0.004), birth weight (2,312 g vs. 2,663 g, <i>p</i> < 0.001), and APGAR scores at 5 and 10 minutes (<i>p</i> = 0.005). Surgical strategies, including rates of primary anastomosis (88% in both groups), did not differ. Anastomotic leak and stricture rates were similar; however, recurrent fistula was more common in VACTERL-CA (4.9% vs. 1.0%, <i>p</i> = 0.023). Overall mortality was higher in VACTERL-CA (14.6% vs. 5.2%, <i>p</i> = 0.003), largely due to associated anomalies such as cardiac or neurologic conditions, whereas EA-related mortality was more frequent in non-VACTERL (1% vs. 0%). Sepsis was also more frequent in VACTERL-CA (10.9% vs. 4.5%, <i>p</i> = 0.033). In multivariate analysis, low birth weight (adjusted odds ratios [aOR]: 0.95 per 100 g, <i>p</i> = 0.010) and cardiac malformations (aOR: 2.33, <i>p</i> = 0.002) were independently associated with VACTERL-CA.EA patients with VACTERL-CA represent a high-risk subgroup characterized by prematurity, major cardiac defects, and increased sepsis risk. These findings highlight the need for early cardiac screening, standardized infection-prevention bundles, and tailored multidisciplinary care to improve survival and reduce preventable complications.</p>","PeriodicalId":56316,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Pediatric Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2025-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145139658","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Kaja Riebesell, Julia Elrod, Patrick Thees, Richard Martel, Christoph Mohr, Christel Weiss, Thomas Schaible, Carolin Riemer, Nina Dietze, Michael Boettcher, Michaela Klinke
Open repair of congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH) in neonates often requires surgical reconstruction of the abdominal wall. Lateral release (LR) of the abdominal wall fascia, a novel technique avoiding prosthetic patches, offers potential advantages. However, data comparing its outcomes to traditional patch repair are limited.A preliminary prospective cohort study was conducted at the University Medical Center Mannheim from 2021 to 2024, including neonates undergoing CDH surgery with abdominal wall reconstruction via direct closure, LR, or patch repair based on intraoperative surgeon decision. Perioperative, postoperative, and short-term outcome data were analyzed during our standardized follow-up protocols and compared between groups.Among 77 eligible neonates, 11 underwent patch repair and 10 received LR. Baseline characteristics between groups were comparable. The median follow-up was 391 days in the patch group and 215 days in the LR group (p = 0.1971). The LR group had significantly shorter median intubation duration, neonatal intensive care unit stay, and overall length of stay compared with the patch group (32.0 days vs. 43.0 days, p = 0.0445; 33.5 days vs. 66.0 days, p = 0.0309; 68.0 days vs. 97.0 days, p = 0.0435). There were no significant differences in recurrence rates, short-term complications, or motor developmental outcomes.LR appears to be associated with shorter hospital stays and faster recovery, without an increase in perioperative or long-term complications. While these findings suggest potential benefits of LR, they must be interpreted with caution due to the limited sample size. Further randomized, multicenter studies with larger cohorts, including long-term assessment of complications, are needed to confirm its efficacy and refine clinical guidelines.
背景:新生儿先天性膈疝(CDH)的开放式修复通常需要手术重建腹壁。腹壁筋膜侧释术(LR)是一种避免人工补片的新技术,具有潜在的优势。然而,将其结果与传统补丁修复进行比较的数据是有限的。方法:2021年至2024年在曼海姆大学医学中心进行了一项初步前瞻性队列研究,包括接受CDH手术的新生儿,根据术中外科医生的决定,通过直接闭合、外侧释放或补片修复进行腹壁重建。在标准化随访方案中分析围手术期、术后和短期结果数据,并进行组间比较。结果:在77例符合条件的新生儿中,11例接受了补片修复,10例接受了LR。两组间基线特征具有可比性。贴片组中位随访时间为391天,LR组中位随访时间为215天(p = 0.1971)。与贴片组相比,LR组的中位插管时间、NICU住院时间和总住院时间(LOS)均显著缩短(32.0 vs 43.0天,p = 0.0445; 33.5 vs 66.0天,p = 0.0309; 68.0 vs 97.0天,p = 0.0435)。两组在复发率、短期并发症或运动发育结局方面无显著差异。结论:侧位松解术似乎与更短的住院时间和更快的恢复有关,而不会增加围手术期或长期并发症。虽然这些发现提示了LR的潜在益处,但由于样本量有限,必须谨慎解释,需要进一步的随机多中心研究,包括并发症的长期评估,以确认其疗效并完善临床指南。
{"title":"Lateral Release in Neonatal Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia Is Associated with Faster Recovery Compared to Abdominal Wall Patch Repair: A Preliminary Prospective Cohort Study.","authors":"Kaja Riebesell, Julia Elrod, Patrick Thees, Richard Martel, Christoph Mohr, Christel Weiss, Thomas Schaible, Carolin Riemer, Nina Dietze, Michael Boettcher, Michaela Klinke","doi":"10.1055/a-2709-5368","DOIUrl":"10.1055/a-2709-5368","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Open repair of congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH) in neonates often requires surgical reconstruction of the abdominal wall. Lateral release (LR) of the abdominal wall fascia, a novel technique avoiding prosthetic patches, offers potential advantages. However, data comparing its outcomes to traditional patch repair are limited.A preliminary prospective cohort study was conducted at the University Medical Center Mannheim from 2021 to 2024, including neonates undergoing CDH surgery with abdominal wall reconstruction via direct closure, LR, or patch repair based on intraoperative surgeon decision. Perioperative, postoperative, and short-term outcome data were analyzed during our standardized follow-up protocols and compared between groups.Among 77 eligible neonates, 11 underwent patch repair and 10 received LR. Baseline characteristics between groups were comparable. The median follow-up was 391 days in the patch group and 215 days in the LR group (<i>p</i> = 0.1971). The LR group had significantly shorter median intubation duration, neonatal intensive care unit stay, and overall length of stay compared with the patch group (32.0 days vs. 43.0 days, <i>p</i> = 0.0445; 33.5 days vs. 66.0 days, <i>p</i> = 0.0309; 68.0 days vs. 97.0 days, <i>p</i> = 0.0435). There were no significant differences in recurrence rates, short-term complications, or motor developmental outcomes.LR appears to be associated with shorter hospital stays and faster recovery, without an increase in perioperative or long-term complications. While these findings suggest potential benefits of LR, they must be interpreted with caution due to the limited sample size. Further randomized, multicenter studies with larger cohorts, including long-term assessment of complications, are needed to confirm its efficacy and refine clinical guidelines.</p>","PeriodicalId":56316,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Pediatric Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2025-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145152036","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Diogo Marques, Rafael Vieira, Ana Fragoso, Tiago Tuna
Nuss procedure is the standard technique for pectus excavatum repair. Despite its minimally invasive nature, this procedure is associated with significant postoperative pain and high opioid consumption. Intercostal nerve cryoablation (INC) has emerged as an adjunct to multimodal analgesia (MMA) to improve pain control, reduce opioid use, and shorten length of stay (LOS). This systematic review aims to assess INC outcomes following the Nuss procedure in pediatric patients.A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and Cochrane Library databases through December 2024. Studies comparing INC with standard MMA, with or without thoracic epidural, in pediatric patients undergoing the Nuss procedure were included. The primary outcome was LOS, and the secondary outcomes were opioid consumption, postoperative pain, complications, operative time, and hospitalization costs. Risk of bias was determined using the National Institutes of Health assessment tool. Meta-analysis was performed using R software.Eleven studies met the inclusion criteria, comprising 922 patients (476 INC and 446 control). INC significantly reduced LOS (-2.2 days; 95% CI: -2.8 to -1.8) at the expense of increased operating room time (+23 minutes; 95% CI: 10-39). Qualitative analysis showed reduced opioid use and comparable pain scores and complication rates with INC, while its impact on costs was conflicting.INC reduces LOS and opioid use in pediatric patients undergoing the Nuss procedure without increasing complications. Further studies are needed to assess long-term safety and cost-effectiveness.
简介:Nuss手术是修复漏斗胸(PE)的标准技术。虽然是微创的,但与明显的术后疼痛和高阿片类药物使用有关。肋间神经冷冻消融(INC)已成为多模式镇痛(MMA)的辅助手段,以改善疼痛控制,减少阿片类药物的使用,缩短住院时间(LOS)。本系统综述旨在评估Nuss手术后INC的预后,并且是第一个专门针对儿科患者的综述。材料和方法:检索PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus和Cochrane Library。比较小儿Nuss患者的INC和标准MMA的研究被纳入。主要结局为LOS;次要结局包括阿片类药物使用、术后疼痛、并发症、手术室时间和住院费用。偏倚评估采用NIH工具,meta分析采用R软件。结果:11项研究入选,包括922例患者(476例INC, 446例对照)。INC显著降低了LOS(-2.2天,95%CI: -2.8;-1.8),尽管增加了手术室时间(+23分钟,95%CI:10-39)。定性分析显示,使用INC后,阿片类药物的使用从50%减少到90%以上。术后疼痛无显著差异,只有两项研究支持INC。“任何并发症”和尿潴留率在INC组明显较低,在其他并发症方面无差异。由于报告的异质性,对成本的影响是相互矛盾的,难以评估。结论:在接受Nuss手术的儿童中,INC减少了LOS和阿片类药物的使用,被认为是传统MMA的一种有希望的辅助手段。需要进一步的研究来评估长期安全性和成本效益。
{"title":"Intercostal Nerve Cryoablation for Postoperative Pain Control After the Nuss Procedure in Children: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Diogo Marques, Rafael Vieira, Ana Fragoso, Tiago Tuna","doi":"10.1055/a-2708-2796","DOIUrl":"10.1055/a-2708-2796","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Nuss procedure is the standard technique for pectus excavatum repair. Despite its minimally invasive nature, this procedure is associated with significant postoperative pain and high opioid consumption. Intercostal nerve cryoablation (INC) has emerged as an adjunct to multimodal analgesia (MMA) to improve pain control, reduce opioid use, and shorten length of stay (LOS). This systematic review aims to assess INC outcomes following the Nuss procedure in pediatric patients.A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and Cochrane Library databases through December 2024. Studies comparing INC with standard MMA, with or without thoracic epidural, in pediatric patients undergoing the Nuss procedure were included. The primary outcome was LOS, and the secondary outcomes were opioid consumption, postoperative pain, complications, operative time, and hospitalization costs. Risk of bias was determined using the National Institutes of Health assessment tool. Meta-analysis was performed using R software.Eleven studies met the inclusion criteria, comprising 922 patients (476 INC and 446 control). INC significantly reduced LOS (-2.2 days; 95% CI: -2.8 to -1.8) at the expense of increased operating room time (+23 minutes; 95% CI: 10-39). Qualitative analysis showed reduced opioid use and comparable pain scores and complication rates with INC, while its impact on costs was conflicting.INC reduces LOS and opioid use in pediatric patients undergoing the Nuss procedure without increasing complications. Further studies are needed to assess long-term safety and cost-effectiveness.</p>","PeriodicalId":56316,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Pediatric Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2025-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145139607","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-10-01Epub Date: 2025-05-19DOI: 10.1055/a-2590-5592
Amulya K Saxena, Romilly K Hayward, Annika Mutanen, Ayman Goneidy, Harmit Ghattaura, Ramon Gorter, Rene Weijnen, Richard Keijzer, Tutku Soyer
Giant omphalocele management had not reached a consensus from the pediatric surgical perspective regarding conservative treatments, surgical approaches, and clinical outcomes. This topic was therefore selected for the 2023 Consensus Session of the European Paediatric Surgeons' Association (EUPSA).Literature review was conducted by seven EUPSA members, guided by a set of predefined areas relating to the management of giant omphalocele: (1) conservative management, (2) surgical management, and (3) outcomes. Members were assigned to specific topics, with discrepancies resolved through structured group discussion and further literature review. Consensus was reached through unanimous agreement among the contributing members. Each topic was presented with available evidence to congress participants. Comments from participants were accounted to formulate the final consensus statement.Giant omphalocele is appropriately defined as viscero-abdominal disproportion preventing primary closure. Regarding (1) conservative management, the "paint and wait" approach is recommended when anatomical constraints or high surgical risk preclude primary closure. Common painting agents include povidone-iodine and silver sulfadiazine, with Manuka honey gaining interest, though consensus on dosing, duration, and complications remains unclear. With regards to (2) surgical management, early closure favors biological meshes, while delayed closure appears most effective using native tissues. High mortality in delayed patch closure likely reflects a population with the most severe defects. Finally, (3) outcomes highlights key prognostic factors including chromosomal abnormalities, cardiac defects, and low birth weight, which may guide counseling, screening, and treatment. Limited data on ruptured omphalocele indicates towards increased mortality, necessitating prompt intervention. Complications following management are relatively rare and typically intervention-related, underscoring the need for long-term, multidisciplinary follow-up.A consensus statement on the management of giant omphalocele was developed based on current evidence and peer practice, though imitations relating to a scarcity of high-level evidence and significant heterogeneity across studies should be acknowledged. Despite these constraints, this consensus statement provides evidence-based guidance to support pediatric surgeons in informed decision-making for this pathology.
{"title":"European Paediatric Surgeons' Association Consensus Statement on the Management of Giant Omphalocele.","authors":"Amulya K Saxena, Romilly K Hayward, Annika Mutanen, Ayman Goneidy, Harmit Ghattaura, Ramon Gorter, Rene Weijnen, Richard Keijzer, Tutku Soyer","doi":"10.1055/a-2590-5592","DOIUrl":"10.1055/a-2590-5592","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Giant omphalocele management had not reached a consensus from the pediatric surgical perspective regarding conservative treatments, surgical approaches, and clinical outcomes. This topic was therefore selected for the 2023 Consensus Session of the European Paediatric Surgeons' Association (EUPSA).Literature review was conducted by seven EUPSA members, guided by a set of predefined areas relating to the management of giant omphalocele: (1) conservative management, (2) surgical management, and (3) outcomes. Members were assigned to specific topics, with discrepancies resolved through structured group discussion and further literature review. Consensus was reached through unanimous agreement among the contributing members. Each topic was presented with available evidence to congress participants. Comments from participants were accounted to formulate the final consensus statement.Giant omphalocele is appropriately defined as viscero-abdominal disproportion preventing primary closure. Regarding (1) <i>conservative management</i>, the \"paint and wait\" approach is recommended when anatomical constraints or high surgical risk preclude primary closure. Common painting agents include povidone-iodine and silver sulfadiazine, with Manuka honey gaining interest, though consensus on dosing, duration, and complications remains unclear. With regards to (2) <i>surgical management</i>, early closure favors biological meshes, while delayed closure appears most effective using native tissues. High mortality in delayed patch closure likely reflects a population with the most severe defects. Finally, (3) <i>outcomes</i> highlights key prognostic factors including chromosomal abnormalities, cardiac defects, and low birth weight, which may guide counseling, screening, and treatment. Limited data on ruptured omphalocele indicates towards increased mortality, necessitating prompt intervention. Complications following management are relatively rare and typically intervention-related, underscoring the need for long-term, multidisciplinary follow-up.A consensus statement on the management of giant omphalocele was developed based on current evidence and peer practice, though imitations relating to a scarcity of high-level evidence and significant heterogeneity across studies should be acknowledged. Despite these constraints, this consensus statement provides evidence-based guidance to support pediatric surgeons in informed decision-making for this pathology.</p>","PeriodicalId":56316,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Pediatric Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"407-416"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144103333","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-10-01Epub Date: 2025-03-21DOI: 10.1055/a-2557-8073
Xianming Xiao, Wei Feng, Jin Zhu, Linxiao Fan, Chenzhu Xiang, Zhili Wang, Jinping Hou, Wei Liu, Zhenhua Guo, Yi Wang
Anorectal malformation (ARM) and Hirschsprung disease (HSCR) are common congenital gastrointestinal defects, but their co-occurrence is rare. This retrospective study analyzed the clinical characteristics of patients with ARM associated with HSCR for early diagnosis and treatment guidance to reduce the occurrence of severe complications.A single-center retrospective cohort analysis from 2010 to 2024 identified 2,341 patients with ARM and 1,721 with HSCR. The histopathologic assessment included hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining and immunohistochemical staining.Seven patients (0.3%) out of 2,341 cases of ARM were diagnosed with concurrent HSCR, three males (42.9%) and four females (57.1%). Seven cases are rectoperineal fistula. All cases developed constipation with abdominal distension within 1 month to 1 year after anoplasty, even following aggressive bowel management. Barium enema showed obvious transition zones, and anorectal manometry revealed absent rectoanal inhibitory reflex in seven cases. All patients underwent the Swenson procedure. The mean duration of postoperative follow-up was 7.5 ± 2.8 years. Seven cases had no constipation, no soiling, voluntary bowel movements by Krickenbeck classification, and excellent continence by the Rintala scoring system in recent follow-up.The association between ARM and HSCR may be rarer than previously reported. Low-type ARM and short or rectosigmoid aganglionosis appeared more common in these cases. Persistent postoperative constipation and abdominal distension unresponsive to conservative treatment should raise suspicion for HSCR, prompting timely diagnostic evaluations. Postoperative bowel function needs to be interpreted carefully, and prospective studies are needed to confirm these findings and guide standardized care.
{"title":"Anorectal Malformations Associated with Hirschsprung Disease: Insights from a Large Cohort of 2,341 ARM Patients in a Single-Center Retrospective Study.","authors":"Xianming Xiao, Wei Feng, Jin Zhu, Linxiao Fan, Chenzhu Xiang, Zhili Wang, Jinping Hou, Wei Liu, Zhenhua Guo, Yi Wang","doi":"10.1055/a-2557-8073","DOIUrl":"10.1055/a-2557-8073","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Anorectal malformation (ARM) and Hirschsprung disease (HSCR) are common congenital gastrointestinal defects, but their co-occurrence is rare. This retrospective study analyzed the clinical characteristics of patients with ARM associated with HSCR for early diagnosis and treatment guidance to reduce the occurrence of severe complications.A single-center retrospective cohort analysis from 2010 to 2024 identified 2,341 patients with ARM and 1,721 with HSCR. The histopathologic assessment included hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining and immunohistochemical staining.Seven patients (0.3%) out of 2,341 cases of ARM were diagnosed with concurrent HSCR, three males (42.9%) and four females (57.1%). Seven cases are rectoperineal fistula. All cases developed constipation with abdominal distension within 1 month to 1 year after anoplasty, even following aggressive bowel management. Barium enema showed obvious transition zones, and anorectal manometry revealed absent rectoanal inhibitory reflex in seven cases. All patients underwent the Swenson procedure. The mean duration of postoperative follow-up was 7.5 ± 2.8 years. Seven cases had no constipation, no soiling, voluntary bowel movements by Krickenbeck classification, and excellent continence by the Rintala scoring system in recent follow-up.The association between ARM and HSCR may be rarer than previously reported. Low-type ARM and short or rectosigmoid aganglionosis appeared more common in these cases. Persistent postoperative constipation and abdominal distension unresponsive to conservative treatment should raise suspicion for HSCR, prompting timely diagnostic evaluations. Postoperative bowel function needs to be interpreted carefully, and prospective studies are needed to confirm these findings and guide standardized care.</p>","PeriodicalId":56316,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Pediatric Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"390-399"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143675066","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-10-01Epub Date: 2025-03-05DOI: 10.1055/a-2551-2131
Richard Gnatzy, Martin Lacher, Michael Berger, Michael Boettcher, Oliver J Deffaa, Joachim Kübler, Omid Madadi-Sanjani, Illya Martynov, Steffi Mayer, Mikko P Pakarinen, Richard Wagner, Tomas Wester, Augusto Zani, Ophelia Aubert
The emergence of large language models (LLMs) has led to notable advancements across multiple sectors, including medicine. Yet, their effect in pediatric surgery remains largely unexplored. This study aims to assess the ability of the artificial intelligence (AI) models ChatGPT-4 and Microsoft Copilot to propose diagnostic procedures, primary and differential diagnoses, as well as answer clinical questions using complex clinical case vignettes of classic pediatric surgical diseases.We conducted the study in April 2024. We evaluated the performance of LLMs using 13 complex clinical case vignettes of pediatric surgical diseases and compared responses to a human cohort of experienced pediatric surgeons. Additionally, pediatric surgeons rated the diagnostic recommendations of LLMs for completeness and accuracy. To determine differences in performance, we performed statistical analyses.ChatGPT-4 achieved a higher test score (52.1%) compared to Copilot (47.9%) but less than pediatric surgeons (68.8%). Overall differences in performance between ChatGPT-4, Copilot, and pediatric surgeons were found to be statistically significant (p < 0.01). ChatGPT-4 demonstrated superior performance in generating differential diagnoses compared to Copilot (p < 0.05). No statistically significant differences were found between the AI models regarding suggestions for diagnostics and primary diagnosis. Overall, the recommendations of LLMs were rated as average by pediatric surgeons.This study reveals significant limitations in the performance of AI models in pediatric surgery. Although LLMs exhibit potential across various areas, their reliability and accuracy in handling clinical decision-making tasks is limited. Further research is needed to improve AI capabilities and establish its usefulness in the clinical setting.
{"title":"Solving Complex Pediatric Surgical Case Studies: A Comparative Analysis of Copilot, ChatGPT-4, and Experienced Pediatric Surgeons' Performance.","authors":"Richard Gnatzy, Martin Lacher, Michael Berger, Michael Boettcher, Oliver J Deffaa, Joachim Kübler, Omid Madadi-Sanjani, Illya Martynov, Steffi Mayer, Mikko P Pakarinen, Richard Wagner, Tomas Wester, Augusto Zani, Ophelia Aubert","doi":"10.1055/a-2551-2131","DOIUrl":"10.1055/a-2551-2131","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The emergence of large language models (LLMs) has led to notable advancements across multiple sectors, including medicine. Yet, their effect in pediatric surgery remains largely unexplored. This study aims to assess the ability of the artificial intelligence (AI) models ChatGPT-4 and Microsoft Copilot to propose diagnostic procedures, primary and differential diagnoses, as well as answer clinical questions using complex clinical case vignettes of classic pediatric surgical diseases.We conducted the study in April 2024. We evaluated the performance of LLMs using 13 complex clinical case vignettes of pediatric surgical diseases and compared responses to a human cohort of experienced pediatric surgeons. Additionally, pediatric surgeons rated the diagnostic recommendations of LLMs for completeness and accuracy. To determine differences in performance, we performed statistical analyses.ChatGPT-4 achieved a higher test score (52.1%) compared to Copilot (47.9%) but less than pediatric surgeons (68.8%). Overall differences in performance between ChatGPT-4, Copilot, and pediatric surgeons were found to be statistically significant (<i>p</i> < 0.01). ChatGPT-4 demonstrated superior performance in generating differential diagnoses compared to Copilot (<i>p</i> < 0.05). No statistically significant differences were found between the AI models regarding suggestions for diagnostics and primary diagnosis. Overall, the recommendations of LLMs were rated as average by pediatric surgeons.This study reveals significant limitations in the performance of AI models in pediatric surgery. Although LLMs exhibit potential across various areas, their reliability and accuracy in handling clinical decision-making tasks is limited. Further research is needed to improve AI capabilities and establish its usefulness in the clinical setting.</p>","PeriodicalId":56316,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Pediatric Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"382-389"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143568929","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-10-01Epub Date: 2025-03-29DOI: 10.1055/a-2540-3621
María San Basilio, Lara Rodríguez-Laguna, Paloma Triana Junco, Víctor Martínez-Glez, Carla Ramirez-Amoros, Carlos Delgado-Miguel, Juan P Rodriguez-Arias, Juan C Lopez-Gutierrez
The genetic study of vascular anomalies provides a better understanding of their etiopathogenesis and allows the use of targeted therapies. Activating KRAS pathogenic variants promote cell proliferation by activating MAPK and PI3K signalling pathways, which have been associated with the pathogenesis of vascular anomalies, especially high-flow ones such as arteriovenous malformations (AVMs). AVMs' genomic landscape is extensive, and a genotype-phenotype correlation has not been shown. In this study, we aimed to prove an association between KRAS gene mutations and the presence of osteolysis in patients with AVMs. Herein, we present a clinical-molecular retrospective study of patients with AVMs, bone involvement, and KRAS pathogenic variants.A retrospective review of patients with AVMs and KRAS somatic variants followed by the Vascular Anomalies Unit at our institution was performed. All patients present bone involvement. We analyzed demographics, clinical features (AVMs location, phenotype), treatment received, and response to treatment. Previous imaging studies were used to assess bone involvement. Genetic studies were performed by high-throughput sequencing using a custom-designed panel.Of the 77 patients with AVMs currently followed in our clinic, 60 (77.9%) had genetic testing, and 19 (31.6%) presented a KRAS somatic activating variant and were therefore included in the study. There were 12 women and 7 men aged 10 to 79 years. When studying radiographies or CT scans, we found that all 19 patients associated osteolysis adjacent to the AVMs. Regarding the KRAS variants, the most frequent one was p.Gly12Asp, followed by p.Gln61His and p.Gly13Arg. Additionally, we reviewed imaging studies from the other 41 patients with AVMs and different pathogenic variants such as MAP2K1, RASA1, and BRAF, and did not find osteolysis.We have described for the first time the relationship between somatic, activating KRAS pathogenic variants and osteolysis in patients with AVMs. Early detection of these KRAS alterations in this type of patient should lead us to rule out bone involvement. Moreover, identifying these mutations may help guide targeted therapies, potentially preventing the development of osteolysis and improving patient outcomes.
{"title":"Association of Somatic KRAS Variants with Osteolysis in Arteriovenous Malformations.","authors":"María San Basilio, Lara Rodríguez-Laguna, Paloma Triana Junco, Víctor Martínez-Glez, Carla Ramirez-Amoros, Carlos Delgado-Miguel, Juan P Rodriguez-Arias, Juan C Lopez-Gutierrez","doi":"10.1055/a-2540-3621","DOIUrl":"10.1055/a-2540-3621","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The genetic study of vascular anomalies provides a better understanding of their etiopathogenesis and allows the use of targeted therapies. Activating <i>KRAS</i> pathogenic variants promote cell proliferation by activating MAPK and PI3K signalling pathways, which have been associated with the pathogenesis of vascular anomalies, especially high-flow ones such as arteriovenous malformations (AVMs). AVMs' genomic landscape is extensive, and a genotype-phenotype correlation has not been shown. In this study, we aimed to prove an association between <i>KRAS</i> gene mutations and the presence of osteolysis in patients with AVMs. Herein, we present a clinical-molecular retrospective study of patients with AVMs, bone involvement, and <i>KRAS</i> pathogenic variants.A retrospective review of patients with AVMs and <i>KRAS</i> somatic variants followed by the Vascular Anomalies Unit at our institution was performed. All patients present bone involvement. We analyzed demographics, clinical features (AVMs location, phenotype), treatment received, and response to treatment. Previous imaging studies were used to assess bone involvement. Genetic studies were performed by high-throughput sequencing using a custom-designed panel.Of the 77 patients with AVMs currently followed in our clinic, 60 (77.9%) had genetic testing, and 19 (31.6%) presented a <i>KRAS</i> somatic activating variant and were therefore included in the study. There were 12 women and 7 men aged 10 to 79 years. When studying radiographies or CT scans, we found that all 19 patients associated osteolysis adjacent to the AVMs. Regarding the <i>KRAS</i> variants, the most frequent one was p.Gly12Asp, followed by p.Gln61His and p.Gly13Arg. Additionally, we reviewed imaging studies from the other 41 patients with AVMs and different pathogenic variants such as <i>MAP2K1</i>, <i>RASA1</i>, and <i>BRAF</i>, and did not find osteolysis.We have described for the first time the relationship between somatic, activating <i>KRAS</i> pathogenic variants and osteolysis in patients with AVMs. Early detection of these <i>KRAS</i> alterations in this type of patient should lead us to rule out bone involvement. Moreover, identifying these mutations may help guide targeted therapies, potentially preventing the development of osteolysis and improving patient outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":56316,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Pediatric Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"362-368"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143744517","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-10-01Epub Date: 2025-04-04DOI: 10.1055/a-2544-9739
Ophelia Aubert, Marta Gazzaneo, Julio César Moreno-Alfonso, Hilmican Ulman, Hanna Garnier, Benno Ure, Martin Lacher
Objective: This study aims to assess publishing trends, motivations, preferences, and challenges among pediatric surgeons globally.
Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted among pediatric surgeons from multiple countries, distributed through the Trainees of European Pediatric Surgery (TEPS) network and social media. The anonymous questionnaire contained 26 items focusing on journal preferences, motivations for publishing, obstacles faced, peer-review experiences, open access publishing, and methods of research dissemination.
Results: A total of 172 responses were collected from pediatric surgeons in 33 countries. Most respondents worked in tertiary hospitals (88%) and were consultants or senior attendings (49%). Over half (65%) had published at least one scientific paper in the last 3 years. PubMed was the primary search engine (82%), and pediatric surgical journals were the preferred outlets for publication (87%). Key motivations for choosing a journal were impact factor (22%) and scope (19%), while publication costs (38%) and slow review processes (22%) were the primary deterrents. Open access publication options were used by more than half of respondents, with a third spending less than €2,500 on fees. Social media, particularly Instagram, emerged as a popular platform for research dissemination.
Conclusion: Pediatric surgeons prefer publishing in specialized journals, with impact factor and scope being key drivers of journal choice. Publication costs and the peer-review process are the most significant obstacles. Efforts to address these challenges, such as reducing fees and enhancing the review process, are crucial for facilitating research dissemination in pediatric surgery.
{"title":"Publishing Trends, Motivations, and Obstacles Among Pediatric Surgeons: An International Survey on Research Dissemination and Peer Review Challenges.","authors":"Ophelia Aubert, Marta Gazzaneo, Julio César Moreno-Alfonso, Hilmican Ulman, Hanna Garnier, Benno Ure, Martin Lacher","doi":"10.1055/a-2544-9739","DOIUrl":"10.1055/a-2544-9739","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong> This study aims to assess publishing trends, motivations, preferences, and challenges among pediatric surgeons globally.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong> A cross-sectional survey was conducted among pediatric surgeons from multiple countries, distributed through the Trainees of European Pediatric Surgery (TEPS) network and social media. The anonymous questionnaire contained 26 items focusing on journal preferences, motivations for publishing, obstacles faced, peer-review experiences, open access publishing, and methods of research dissemination.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong> A total of 172 responses were collected from pediatric surgeons in 33 countries. Most respondents worked in tertiary hospitals (88%) and were consultants or senior attendings (49%). Over half (65%) had published at least one scientific paper in the last 3 years. PubMed was the primary search engine (82%), and pediatric surgical journals were the preferred outlets for publication (87%). Key motivations for choosing a journal were impact factor (22%) and scope (19%), while publication costs (38%) and slow review processes (22%) were the primary deterrents. Open access publication options were used by more than half of respondents, with a third spending less than €2,500 on fees. Social media, particularly Instagram, emerged as a popular platform for research dissemination.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong> Pediatric surgeons prefer publishing in specialized journals, with impact factor and scope being key drivers of journal choice. Publication costs and the peer-review process are the most significant obstacles. Efforts to address these challenges, such as reducing fees and enhancing the review process, are crucial for facilitating research dissemination in pediatric surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":56316,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Pediatric Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"369-374"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143789390","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}