Sickle cell disease (SCD) is a genetic disorder that predisposes affected individuals to a range of complications, including an increased susceptibility to viral infections. These infections present significant clinical challenges due to the underlying immunocompromised state in SCD patients. This review examines the interaction between viral infections and SCD, highlighting the vulnerabilities and the impact of these infections on morbidity and mortality in this population. Advances in antiviral therapies have significantly improved outcomes, yet managing viral infections in SCD patients requires special consideration due to drug-to-drug interactions, altered pharmacokinetics, and the potential exacerbation of SCD-related complications. Additionally, vaccination strategies against viral infections and the emerging role of prophylactic antiviral treatments are discussed as critical components of infection prevention. By focusing on both established and novel antiviral treatments, this article aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the challenges and opportunities in managing viral infections in patients with SCD.
{"title":"New frontiers in sickle cell disease: The role of antiviral therapies and emerging drugs in managing viral infections.","authors":"Tarun Sahu, Arunita Tushar Jagzape, Meenakshi Sinha, Ramanjan Sinha, Henu Kumar Verma","doi":"10.5501/wjv.v14.i2.101693","DOIUrl":"10.5501/wjv.v14.i2.101693","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Sickle cell disease (SCD) is a genetic disorder that predisposes affected individuals to a range of complications, including an increased susceptibility to viral infections. These infections present significant clinical challenges due to the underlying immunocompromised state in SCD patients. This review examines the interaction between viral infections and SCD, highlighting the vulnerabilities and the impact of these infections on morbidity and mortality in this population. Advances in antiviral therapies have significantly improved outcomes, yet managing viral infections in SCD patients requires special consideration due to drug-to-drug interactions, altered pharmacokinetics, and the potential exacerbation of SCD-related complications. Additionally, vaccination strategies against viral infections and the emerging role of prophylactic antiviral treatments are discussed as critical components of infection prevention. By focusing on both established and novel antiviral treatments, this article aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the challenges and opportunities in managing viral infections in patients with SCD.</p>","PeriodicalId":61903,"journal":{"name":"世界病毒学杂志(英文版)","volume":"14 2","pages":"101693"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12188923/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144509773","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-06-25DOI: 10.5501/wjv.v14.i2.102674
Adekunle Sanyaolu, Chuku Okorie, Aleksandra Marinkovic, Stephanie Prakash, Vyshnavy Balendra, Amine Lehachi, Abu Fahad Abbasi, Nafees Haider, Amos Abioye, Verner N Orish, Afolabi Antonio, Olanrewaju Badaru, Rajashree Pandit, Ricardo Izurieta
<p><p>The novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) causes serious respiratory illness and related disorders. Vulnerable populations, including those with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, heart disease, diabetes, chronic kidney disease, obesity, and the elderly, face an increased risk of severe complications. As the pandemic evolves, various diagnostic techniques are available to detect severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (SARS-CoV-2), including clinical presentation, rapid antigen/antibody testing, molecular testing, supplemental laboratory analysis, and imaging. Based on peer-reviewed data, treatment options include convalescent plasma transfusion, corticosteroids, antivirals, and immunomodulatory medications. Convalescent plasma therapy, historically used in outbreaks like Middle East respiratory syndrome, Ebola, and SARS, is suggested by the World Health Organization for critically ill COVID-19 patients when vaccines or antiviral drugs are unavailable. Neutralizing antibodies in convalescent plasma help control viral load and improve patient outcomes, especially when administered early, though effectiveness varies. The United States Food and Drug Administration has authorized its emergency use for severe COVID-19 cases, but potential risks such as transfusion reactions and transfusion-related acute lung injury require further investigation to establish definitive efficacy. Antiviral agents like Remdesivir, an adenosine nucleotide analog, inhibit viral RNA polymerase and have shown efficacy in reducing COVID-19 severity, leading to its emergency use authorization for hospitalized patients. Other antivirals like ritonavir, lopinavir, and umifenovir disrupt viral replication and entry, but their effectiveness against SARS-CoV-2 remains under investigation. Dexamethasone, a corticosteroid, has been used in critically ill COVID-19 patients to reduce inflammation and prevent respiratory failure, as shown in the RECOVERY trial. Other immunosuppressants like ruxolitinib, baricitinib, and colchicine help modulate the immune response, reducing cytokine storms and inflammation-related complications. However, corticosteroids carry risks such as hyperglycemia, immunosuppression, and delayed viral clearance, requiring careful administration. Systematic reviews of clinical studies revealed that hydroxychloroquine with or without azithromycin did not decrease viral load nor reduce the severity of symptoms, but increased mortality among acutely hospitalized patients. There was no improvement in patients' clinical conditions after 15 days compared to standard treatment. The United States Food and Drug Administration has revoked the authorization for the use of hydroxychloroquine in COVID-19 patients due to the null benefit-risk balance. Monoclonal antibodies like itolizumab, gimsilumab, sarilumab, and tocilizumab are being studied for their ability to reduce the severe inflammatory response in COVID-19 patients, particularly cytokine release syndr
{"title":"COVID-19 management in patients with comorbid conditions.","authors":"Adekunle Sanyaolu, Chuku Okorie, Aleksandra Marinkovic, Stephanie Prakash, Vyshnavy Balendra, Amine Lehachi, Abu Fahad Abbasi, Nafees Haider, Amos Abioye, Verner N Orish, Afolabi Antonio, Olanrewaju Badaru, Rajashree Pandit, Ricardo Izurieta","doi":"10.5501/wjv.v14.i2.102674","DOIUrl":"10.5501/wjv.v14.i2.102674","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) causes serious respiratory illness and related disorders. Vulnerable populations, including those with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, heart disease, diabetes, chronic kidney disease, obesity, and the elderly, face an increased risk of severe complications. As the pandemic evolves, various diagnostic techniques are available to detect severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (SARS-CoV-2), including clinical presentation, rapid antigen/antibody testing, molecular testing, supplemental laboratory analysis, and imaging. Based on peer-reviewed data, treatment options include convalescent plasma transfusion, corticosteroids, antivirals, and immunomodulatory medications. Convalescent plasma therapy, historically used in outbreaks like Middle East respiratory syndrome, Ebola, and SARS, is suggested by the World Health Organization for critically ill COVID-19 patients when vaccines or antiviral drugs are unavailable. Neutralizing antibodies in convalescent plasma help control viral load and improve patient outcomes, especially when administered early, though effectiveness varies. The United States Food and Drug Administration has authorized its emergency use for severe COVID-19 cases, but potential risks such as transfusion reactions and transfusion-related acute lung injury require further investigation to establish definitive efficacy. Antiviral agents like Remdesivir, an adenosine nucleotide analog, inhibit viral RNA polymerase and have shown efficacy in reducing COVID-19 severity, leading to its emergency use authorization for hospitalized patients. Other antivirals like ritonavir, lopinavir, and umifenovir disrupt viral replication and entry, but their effectiveness against SARS-CoV-2 remains under investigation. Dexamethasone, a corticosteroid, has been used in critically ill COVID-19 patients to reduce inflammation and prevent respiratory failure, as shown in the RECOVERY trial. Other immunosuppressants like ruxolitinib, baricitinib, and colchicine help modulate the immune response, reducing cytokine storms and inflammation-related complications. However, corticosteroids carry risks such as hyperglycemia, immunosuppression, and delayed viral clearance, requiring careful administration. Systematic reviews of clinical studies revealed that hydroxychloroquine with or without azithromycin did not decrease viral load nor reduce the severity of symptoms, but increased mortality among acutely hospitalized patients. There was no improvement in patients' clinical conditions after 15 days compared to standard treatment. The United States Food and Drug Administration has revoked the authorization for the use of hydroxychloroquine in COVID-19 patients due to the null benefit-risk balance. Monoclonal antibodies like itolizumab, gimsilumab, sarilumab, and tocilizumab are being studied for their ability to reduce the severe inflammatory response in COVID-19 patients, particularly cytokine release syndr","PeriodicalId":61903,"journal":{"name":"世界病毒学杂志(英文版)","volume":"14 2","pages":"102674"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12188852/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144509764","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-06-25DOI: 10.5501/wjv.v14.i2.99663
Kundavaram Paul Prabhakar Abhilash, Mathew Varghese Nellimootil, Binila Chacko, Darpanarayan Hazra, Victor Coelho, John Emmanuel Jesudasan, Karthik Gunasekaran, Lovely Thomas, More Atul Ramchandra, Jonathan Melchizedek, Henah Meshack Gunaraj, Mahesh Moorthy, John Victor Peter
Background: In the initial stages of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, healthcare workers (HCWs) who were immunologically naive to COVID-19, were exposed to a highly transmissible virus.
Aim: To compare infection risk among HCWs in high-risk (HR) and low-risk (LR) areas.
Methods: Data on reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction confirmed clinical infection and samples for nucleocapsid, and spike protein antibodies were collected at five time-points (T1 to T5) from HCWs in the emergency department and intensive care unit (HR group) and pre-clinical and para-clinical areas (LR). For the sero-study, only participants who provided at least one baseline sample and one during the second wave (T4 or T5) were analysed. Since CovishieldTM elicits only spike protein antibodies, subclinical infection was diagnosed if asymptomatic unvaccinated and CovishieldTM vaccinated individuals tested positive for nucleocapsid antibody.
Results: Overall, by T5, clinical infection rate was similar in the HR (120/366, 32.8%) and LR (22/82, 26.8%) groups (P = 0.17). However, before vaccination (T3), more HCWs in the HR group developed COVID-19 infection (21.9% vs 8.8%, P = 0.046). In the sero-study group, clinical infection occurred in 31.5% (45/143) and 23.7% (14/59) in the HR and LR groups respectively (P = 0.23). Spike antibody was detected in 140/143 (97.9%) and 56/59 (94.9%) and nucleocapsid antibody was positive in 95/143 (66.4%) and 35/59 (59.3%) in the HR and LR groups respectively (P = 0.34). Subclinical infection rate (HR 34.9%, LR 35.6%, P = 0.37) and hospitalization rate were similar. There was no mortality.
Conclusion: Before vaccination, HCWs in HR areas had a higher risk of infection. Seroprevalence studies suggest that sub-clinical infection was not uncommon.
背景:在2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行的初始阶段,免疫未接触COVID-19的卫生保健工作者(HCWs)暴露于高传染性病毒。目的:比较高危地区(HR)和低危地区(LR)医护人员的感染风险。方法:收集急诊科、重症监护室(HR组)和临床前、临床准区(LR)医护人员5个时间点(T1 ~ T5)的逆转录聚合酶链反应确诊临床感染数据及核衣壳、刺突蛋白抗体样本。对于血清研究,仅对至少提供一个基线样本和一个在第二波(T4或T5)期间提供样本的参与者进行分析。由于CovishieldTM只引起刺突蛋白抗体,如果无症状未接种CovishieldTM和接种CovishieldTM的个体核衣壳抗体阳性,则诊断为亚临床感染。结果:总体而言,到T5时,HR组(120/366,32.8%)和LR组(22/82,26.8%)的临床感染率相似(P = 0.17)。而在接种前(T3), HR组出现COVID-19感染的HCWs较多(21.9% vs 8.8%, P = 0.046)。血清研究组中,HR组临床感染发生率为31.5% (45/143),LR组为23.7% (14/59)(P = 0.23)。HR组和LR组的Spike抗体阳性率分别为140/143(97.9%)和56/59(94.9%),核衣壳抗体阳性率分别为95/143(66.4%)和35/59 (59.3%)(P = 0.34)。亚临床感染率(HR 34.9%, LR 35.6%, P = 0.37)与住院率相似。没有死亡。结论:疫苗接种前,疫区卫生保健员感染风险较高。血清阳性率研究表明亚临床感染并不罕见。
{"title":"Risk of COVID-19 infection among frontline healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic.","authors":"Kundavaram Paul Prabhakar Abhilash, Mathew Varghese Nellimootil, Binila Chacko, Darpanarayan Hazra, Victor Coelho, John Emmanuel Jesudasan, Karthik Gunasekaran, Lovely Thomas, More Atul Ramchandra, Jonathan Melchizedek, Henah Meshack Gunaraj, Mahesh Moorthy, John Victor Peter","doi":"10.5501/wjv.v14.i2.99663","DOIUrl":"10.5501/wjv.v14.i2.99663","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In the initial stages of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, healthcare workers (HCWs) who were immunologically naive to COVID-19, were exposed to a highly transmissible virus.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To compare infection risk among HCWs in high-risk (HR) and low-risk (LR) areas.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data on reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction confirmed clinical infection and samples for nucleocapsid, and spike protein antibodies were collected at five time-points (T1 to T5) from HCWs in the emergency department and intensive care unit (HR group) and pre-clinical and para-clinical areas (LR). For the sero-study, only participants who provided at least one baseline sample and one during the second wave (T4 or T5) were analysed. Since Covishield<sup>TM</sup> elicits only spike protein antibodies, subclinical infection was diagnosed if asymptomatic unvaccinated and Covishield<sup>TM</sup> vaccinated individuals tested positive for nucleocapsid antibody.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, by T5, clinical infection rate was similar in the HR (120/366, 32.8%) and LR (22/82, 26.8%) groups (<i>P</i> = 0.17). However, before vaccination (T3), more HCWs in the HR group developed COVID-19 infection (21.9% <i>vs</i> 8.8%, <i>P</i> = 0.046). In the sero-study group, clinical infection occurred in 31.5% (45/143) and 23.7% (14/59) in the HR and LR groups respectively (<i>P</i> = 0.23). Spike antibody was detected in 140/143 (97.9%) and 56/59 (94.9%) and nucleocapsid antibody was positive in 95/143 (66.4%) and 35/59 (59.3%) in the HR and LR groups respectively (<i>P</i> = 0.34). Subclinical infection rate (HR 34.9%, LR 35.6%, <i>P</i> = 0.37) and hospitalization rate were similar. There was no mortality.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Before vaccination, HCWs in HR areas had a higher risk of infection. Seroprevalence studies suggest that sub-clinical infection was not uncommon.</p>","PeriodicalId":61903,"journal":{"name":"世界病毒学杂志(英文版)","volume":"14 2","pages":"99663"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12188883/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144509775","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-06-25DOI: 10.5501/wjv.v14.i2.100986
Liyan Ajit D Souza, Abdulqadir J Nashwan
Rhabdomyolysis (RM) is characterized by disrupting muscle cells and releasing intracellular components into circulation. Some symptoms associated with RM include muscle weakness, discolored urine, and myalgia. RM can be caused by coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) causing exaggerated immune response leading to muscle damage. Acute kidney injury (AKI), when presented with RM, leads to increased mortality. Examining RM-related AKI and its comparison to other AKI types in COVID-19 patients could improve the management of viral infections developing RM and AKI. RM potentially complicated COVID-19 infection course and is a major etiology of AKI. RM-related AKI had higher severity and mortality than other AKI types, with increased hypercoagulopathy and inflammatory markers. Findings also express procalcitonin use in follow-ups with severe COVID-19 patients. Study limitations include small sample size, absence of kidney biopsies, and focus on the first wave of the pandemic, which should be addressed in future research to generate accurate and relevant findings.
{"title":"Examining rhabdomyolysis-related acute kidney injury in COVID-19 patients and its comparison to other acute kidney injury types.","authors":"Liyan Ajit D Souza, Abdulqadir J Nashwan","doi":"10.5501/wjv.v14.i2.100986","DOIUrl":"10.5501/wjv.v14.i2.100986","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Rhabdomyolysis (RM) is characterized by disrupting muscle cells and releasing intracellular components into circulation. Some symptoms associated with RM include muscle weakness, discolored urine, and myalgia. RM can be caused by coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) causing exaggerated immune response leading to muscle damage. Acute kidney injury (AKI), when presented with RM, leads to increased mortality. Examining RM-related AKI and its comparison to other AKI types in COVID-19 patients could improve the management of viral infections developing RM and AKI. RM potentially complicated COVID-19 infection course and is a major etiology of AKI. RM-related AKI had higher severity and mortality than other AKI types, with increased hypercoagulopathy and inflammatory markers. Findings also express procalcitonin use in follow-ups with severe COVID-19 patients. Study limitations include small sample size, absence of kidney biopsies, and focus on the first wave of the pandemic, which should be addressed in future research to generate accurate and relevant findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":61903,"journal":{"name":"世界病毒学杂志(英文版)","volume":"14 2","pages":"100986"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12188876/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144509766","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background: The emergence of the Omicron variant (B.1.1.529) of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) raised global concerns with its highly transmissible nature.
Aim: To investigate the genomic, clinical, and demographic characteristics of Omicron infections within the early outbreak cluster in western part of Sri Lanka.
Methods: We analyzed sequence data from January 2022 to April 2022 to understand variant dynamics, clinical presentation, and demographic associations.
Results: Whole-genome sequencing of 85 nasopharyngeal and throat swab samples collected in western part of Sri Lanka between January and April 2022 identified 70 (82.34%) of it as Omicron variants. BA.2 was the most prevalent sub-lineage (57%), followed by BA.1.1 (14.20%) and majority of them were from > 12 years old individuals. Phylogenetic analysis revealed clustering into four distinct clades (21I, 21K, 21L, and 21M), suggesting potential differences in transmission chains or evolutionary pressures.
Conclusion: This study found BA.2 to be the predominant Omicron sub-lineage in the western part of Sri Lanka during the first quarter of 2022, aligning with global trends. Phylogenetic analysis revealed diverse introductions and local transmission. Continued genomic surveillance and robust public health measures remain crucial for managing the evolving SARS-CoV-2 landscape.
{"title":"Genomic and demographic characterization of SARS-CoV-2 infections within early Omicron cluster, Western Sri Lanka.","authors":"Nipuni Arachchige, Ramesha Dharmasiri, Achini Weerathunga, Shehan Senanayake, Nadeeka Janage, Rohitha Muthugala","doi":"10.5501/wjv.v14.i2.106108","DOIUrl":"10.5501/wjv.v14.i2.106108","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The emergence of the Omicron variant (B.1.1.529) of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) raised global concerns with its highly transmissible nature.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To investigate the genomic, clinical, and demographic characteristics of Omicron infections within the early outbreak cluster in western part of Sri Lanka.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed sequence data from January 2022 to April 2022 to understand variant dynamics, clinical presentation, and demographic associations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Whole-genome sequencing of 85 nasopharyngeal and throat swab samples collected in western part of Sri Lanka between January and April 2022 identified 70 (82.34%) of it as Omicron variants. BA.2 was the most prevalent sub-lineage (57%), followed by BA.1.1 (14.20%) and majority of them were from > 12 years old individuals. Phylogenetic analysis revealed clustering into four distinct clades (21I, 21K, 21L, and 21M), suggesting potential differences in transmission chains or evolutionary pressures.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study found BA.2 to be the predominant Omicron sub-lineage in the western part of Sri Lanka during the first quarter of 2022, aligning with global trends. Phylogenetic analysis revealed diverse introductions and local transmission. Continued genomic surveillance and robust public health measures remain crucial for managing the evolving SARS-CoV-2 landscape.</p>","PeriodicalId":61903,"journal":{"name":"世界病毒学杂志(英文版)","volume":"14 2","pages":"106108"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12188914/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144509768","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background: The upsurge of antibiotic resistance is a significant challenge to public health, and the dry pipeline of new antibiotics has prompted the discovery of alternative treatment approaches. Enterococcus faecalis (E. faecalis) isolates are often multidrug-resistant, posing challenges to antibiotic therapy. Bacteriophage therapy is being explored as an alternative method to treat the growing population of antibiotic-resistant infections. Nevertheless, many inherent limitations of phages diminish their therapeutic utility, notably the restricted host range and quick development of mutants. The specific types and quantities of bacteriophages and antibiotics may be crucial in generating the optimal phage-antibiotic synergy.
Aim: To optimize the doses, order, and timing to optimize the synergy of phages and vancomycin on different bacteria states.
Methods: A volume of 180 μL of E. faecalis bacteria in the logarithmic growth phase, with a concentration of approximately 1 × 108 colony forming units (CFUs)/mL, was introduced onto a microtitre plate. Subsequently, 20 μL of phage suspension (1 × 106 PFUs/mL), vancomycin (16 µg/mL), or a combination of both was introduced into the designated wells in the specified sequence and incubated at 37 °C for 48 hours. The number of live bacteria was counted at different time points using standardized CFU counting protocols.
Results: The biofilm model demonstrated that combining phages with vancomycin can eradicate the biofilm. Sequential therapy, involving phage application 8 hours before the antibiotic at a concentration of 108 PFUs/mL, proved the most efficient in eliminating the biofilms and killing the planktonic form of E. faecalis.
Conclusion: The combination of phage ɸEFP01 at a higher concentration with a subinhibitory concentration of vancomycin yields a synergistic antibacterial outcome on E. faecalis strain resistant to vancomycin.
{"title":"Synergistic efficacy of phages along with vancomycin for eradication of vancomycin-resistant <i>Enterococcus faecalis</i> biofilms.","authors":"Minakshi Sahu, Ranjeet Kumar Vishwakarma, Subhash Lal Karn, Gopal Nath","doi":"10.5501/wjv.v14.i2.95826","DOIUrl":"10.5501/wjv.v14.i2.95826","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The upsurge of antibiotic resistance is a significant challenge to public health, and the dry pipeline of new antibiotics has prompted the discovery of alternative treatment approaches. <i>Enterococcus faecalis</i> (<i>E. faecalis</i>) isolates are often multidrug-resistant, posing challenges to antibiotic therapy. Bacteriophage therapy is being explored as an alternative method to treat the growing population of antibiotic-resistant infections. Nevertheless, many inherent limitations of phages diminish their therapeutic utility, notably the restricted host range and quick development of mutants. The specific types and quantities of bacteriophages and antibiotics may be crucial in generating the optimal phage-antibiotic synergy.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To optimize the doses, order, and timing to optimize the synergy of phages and vancomycin on different bacteria states.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A volume of 180 μL of <i>E. faecalis</i> bacteria in the logarithmic growth phase, with a concentration of approximately 1 × 10<sup>8</sup> colony forming units (CFUs)/mL, was introduced onto a microtitre plate. Subsequently, 20 μL of phage suspension (1 × 10<sup>6</sup> PFUs/mL), vancomycin (16 µg/mL), or a combination of both was introduced into the designated wells in the specified sequence and incubated at 37 °C for 48 hours. The number of live bacteria was counted at different time points using standardized CFU counting protocols.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The biofilm model demonstrated that combining phages with vancomycin can eradicate the biofilm. Sequential therapy, involving phage application 8 hours before the antibiotic at a concentration of 10<sup>8</sup> PFUs/mL, proved the most efficient in eliminating the biofilms and killing the planktonic form of <i>E. faecalis.</i></p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The combination of phage ɸEFP01 at a higher concentration with a subinhibitory concentration of vancomycin yields a synergistic antibacterial outcome on <i>E. faecalis</i> strain resistant to vancomycin.</p>","PeriodicalId":61903,"journal":{"name":"世界病毒学杂志(英文版)","volume":"14 2","pages":"95826"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12188910/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144509777","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-06-25DOI: 10.5501/wjv.v14.i2.102673
Jiyoon Park, Amr Sayed, Syed Alishan Nasir, Joseph K Lim
Chronic hepatitis delta virus (HDV) represents a rare but important co-infection in approximately 5% of patients with chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection, and is associated with significant morbidity and mortality due to an increased risk for liver cirrhosis, liver failure, and hepatocellular carcinoma relative to HBV monoinfected individuals. The current treatment of chronic HDV infection includes the off-label use of pegylated interferon (IFN), which is limited by poor safety, tolerability, and efficacy. Guidelines of the major international liver organizations such as the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases, European Association for the Study of the Liver, and Asian Pacific Association for the Study of the Liver provide recommendations for contemporary diagnosis and management of chronic HDV infection, including the incorporation of bulevirtide, a newly licensed antiviral agent in Europe. Significant unmet medical needs remain in the treatment of HDV, and recent advances in drug development offer hope for meaningful advances in drug therapy which may improve virologic response rates and clinical outcomes. This review summarizes trial design and available efficacy data from key phase 2 and 3 trials for investigational therapies including entry inhibitors (bulevirtide), prenylation inhibitors (lonafarnib), novel IFNs (peginterferon lambda), RNA interference molecules (JNJ-3989, elebsiran), monoclonal antibodies (tobevibart), and nucleic acid polymers (REP2139), and addresses future directions in HDV pharmacotherapy.
{"title":"Advances in treatment of hepatitis delta virus infection: Update on novel investigational drugs.","authors":"Jiyoon Park, Amr Sayed, Syed Alishan Nasir, Joseph K Lim","doi":"10.5501/wjv.v14.i2.102673","DOIUrl":"10.5501/wjv.v14.i2.102673","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Chronic hepatitis delta virus (HDV) represents a rare but important co-infection in approximately 5% of patients with chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection, and is associated with significant morbidity and mortality due to an increased risk for liver cirrhosis, liver failure, and hepatocellular carcinoma relative to HBV monoinfected individuals. The current treatment of chronic HDV infection includes the off-label use of pegylated interferon (IFN), which is limited by poor safety, tolerability, and efficacy. Guidelines of the major international liver organizations such as the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases, European Association for the Study of the Liver, and Asian Pacific Association for the Study of the Liver provide recommendations for contemporary diagnosis and management of chronic HDV infection, including the incorporation of bulevirtide, a newly licensed antiviral agent in Europe. Significant unmet medical needs remain in the treatment of HDV, and recent advances in drug development offer hope for meaningful advances in drug therapy which may improve virologic response rates and clinical outcomes. This review summarizes trial design and available efficacy data from key phase 2 and 3 trials for investigational therapies including entry inhibitors (bulevirtide), prenylation inhibitors (lonafarnib), novel IFNs (peginterferon lambda), RNA interference molecules (JNJ-3989, elebsiran), monoclonal antibodies (tobevibart), and nucleic acid polymers (REP2139), and addresses future directions in HDV pharmacotherapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":61903,"journal":{"name":"世界病毒学杂志(英文版)","volume":"14 2","pages":"102673"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12188869/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144509760","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background: Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection process of progression encompasses multiple stages, commencing with inflammation and culminating in hepatocellular cancer. Numerous invasive and non-invasive procedures exist for diagnosing chronic HCV infection. Though beneficial, invasive procedures can cause morbidity and inadequate representation of the overall degree of fibrosis. Due to these reasons, non-invasive liver fibrosis biomarkers are becoming more prevalent to diagnose and track liver fibrosis without a liver biopsy. These biomarkers can detect liver fibrosis early, improving treatment and preventing cirrhosis and liver failure. Micro ribonucleic acid (MiRNA) dysregulation causes and worsens several diseases including liver disease. MiRNAs can facilitate the diagnosis of liver fibrosis and serve as a predictive tool to enhance patient care by minimizing invasive procedures and enabling more efficient and prompt therapy.
Aim: To investigate the diagnostic effectiveness of several miRNAs (miRNA-122, miRNA-21, miRNA-199a, miRNA-155) in assessing the liver fibrosis severity in untreated HCV patients from the Indian Punjab population. We seek to identify the intricate diagnostic relationship of miRNAs with the extent of fibrosis among individuals with HCV.
Methods: We considered 100 persons determined as HCV infected by a quantitative Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction examination. We employed statistical as well as probabilistic tools to ascertain the diagnostic validity of miRNAs for determining the liver fibrosis stages. We employed Bayesian Networks, to introduce a unique diagnostic paradigm for miRNAs that can be adopted as benchmark to evaluate the liver fibrosis severity in HCV cases.
Results: We found that miRNAs (miR-122, miR-155 and miR-21) showed significant upregulation when compared with control and according to severity of fibrosis (P ≤ 0.05). The area under the curve for miR-122, miR-155, miR-21 and miR-199a in HCV group in relation to Liver Stiffness Measurement was calculated as 0.889, 0.933, 0.912 and 0.035 respectively. MiR-199a was downregulated according to degree of fibrosis.
Conclusion: Depending on the diagnostic accuracy, we have concluded that miR-122, miR-155 and miR-21 are reliable markers to detect fibrosis in Hepatitis C patients.
{"title":"Micro RNAs as a potential biomarker for predicting liver fibrosis severity in hepatitis C virus affected patients.","authors":"Navneet Kaur, Ravinder Garg, Chaitanya Tapasvi, Gitanjali Goyal","doi":"10.5501/wjv.v14.i2.101976","DOIUrl":"10.5501/wjv.v14.i2.101976","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection process of progression encompasses multiple stages, commencing with inflammation and culminating in hepatocellular cancer. Numerous invasive and non-invasive procedures exist for diagnosing chronic HCV infection. Though beneficial, invasive procedures can cause morbidity and inadequate representation of the overall degree of fibrosis. Due to these reasons, non-invasive liver fibrosis biomarkers are becoming more prevalent to diagnose and track liver fibrosis without a liver biopsy. These biomarkers can detect liver fibrosis early, improving treatment and preventing cirrhosis and liver failure. Micro ribonucleic acid (MiRNA) dysregulation causes and worsens several diseases including liver disease. MiRNAs can facilitate the diagnosis of liver fibrosis and serve as a predictive tool to enhance patient care by minimizing invasive procedures and enabling more efficient and prompt therapy.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To investigate the diagnostic effectiveness of several miRNAs (miRNA-122, miRNA-21, miRNA-199a, miRNA-155) in assessing the liver fibrosis severity in untreated HCV patients from the Indian Punjab population. We seek to identify the intricate diagnostic relationship of miRNAs with the extent of fibrosis among individuals with HCV.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We considered 100 persons determined as HCV infected by a quantitative Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction examination. We employed statistical as well as probabilistic tools to ascertain the diagnostic validity of miRNAs for determining the liver fibrosis stages. We employed Bayesian Networks, to introduce a unique diagnostic paradigm for miRNAs that can be adopted as benchmark to evaluate the liver fibrosis severity in HCV cases.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We found that miRNAs (miR-122, miR-155 and miR-21) showed significant upregulation when compared with control and according to severity of fibrosis (<i>P</i> ≤ 0.05). The area under the curve for miR-122, miR-155, miR-21 and miR-199a in HCV group in relation to Liver Stiffness Measurement was calculated as 0.889, 0.933, 0.912 and 0.035 respectively. MiR-199a was downregulated according to degree of fibrosis.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Depending on the diagnostic accuracy, we have concluded that miR-122, miR-155 and miR-21 are reliable markers to detect fibrosis in Hepatitis C patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":61903,"journal":{"name":"世界病毒学杂志(英文版)","volume":"14 2","pages":"101976"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12188894/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144509771","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-06-25DOI: 10.5501/wjv.v14.i2.107322
Hafidha Mhando Bakari, Jackson Sebeza, Haji Mbwana Ally, Hassan Fredrick Fussi, Habib Omari Ramadhani, Peter Memiah, Djemima Umutesi, Basile Ikuzo, Gallican Rwibasira
Background: To prevent mother to child transmission (MTCT) of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), sustained maternal viral load suppression (VLS) and early HIV testing among HIV exposed infants (HEI) is critical.
Aim: To investigate maternal viral load results and infant HIV testing uptake at 6-weeks, and 9-months and 18-months in Rwanda.
Methods: Between 2015 and 2022, VLS (< 200 copies/mL) was measured among pregnant women living with HIV (WLHIV) from 38-healthcare facilities. Viral loads (VL) were measured at 6-months, 12-months and 24-months, respectively. For maternal VL, the unit of analysis was visit-pair, and the pairs were created to define those with VL < 200 copies/mL at two consecutive visits as having sustained VLS, persistent viremia (VL ≥ 200 copies/mL at two consecutive visits), viral rebound (VL < 200 copies/mL at prior visit only) and newly suppressed (VL < 200 copies/mL at subsequent visit only). HEI were considered to have persistent HIV testing if they had all three HIV tests. Poisson regression models with generalized estimating equations were used to estimate the adjusted incidence rate ratio (aIRR) and 95%CI for factors associated with sustained VLS and persistent HIV testing.
Results: A total of 1145 mother-infant pairs were analyzed. Infant HIV testing uptake at 6- weeks, 9-months and 18-months was 1145 (100.0%), 1089 (95.1%), 1006 (87.9%) respectively. Nine hundred ninety-nine HEI (87.3%) tested for HIV persistently. At 18-months, the incidence of HIV among HEI was 8 (0.7%). Of 1145 mothers, 1076 (94.0%) had ≥ 2 VL results making a total of 2010 visit-pairs (142-single; 934-double visit-pairs). The incidence rate of sustained VLS, persistent viremia, viral rebound and new suppression were 91.0%, 1.3%, 3.6% and 4.0% respectively. Maternal disclosure of HIV status (aIRR = 1.08, 95%CI: 1.02-1.14) was associated with increased likelihood of sustained VLS. Having peer support (aIRR = 1.05 95%CI: 1.01-1.10) was associated with persistent HIV testing among HEI.
Conclusion: Sustained VLS is high among pregnant WLHIV in Rwanda. The low incidence of HIV among HEI may be attributed to high VLS levels. Targeted interventions, including enhanced HIV disclosure and peer support, are crucial for improving sustained VLS and increasing infant HIV testing uptake to reduce MTCT.
{"title":"Sustained maternal human immunodeficiency virus viral load suppression and cascade of human immunodeficiency virus testing among exposed infants in Rwanda.","authors":"Hafidha Mhando Bakari, Jackson Sebeza, Haji Mbwana Ally, Hassan Fredrick Fussi, Habib Omari Ramadhani, Peter Memiah, Djemima Umutesi, Basile Ikuzo, Gallican Rwibasira","doi":"10.5501/wjv.v14.i2.107322","DOIUrl":"10.5501/wjv.v14.i2.107322","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To prevent mother to child transmission (MTCT) of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), sustained maternal viral load suppression (VLS) and early HIV testing among HIV exposed infants (HEI) is critical.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To investigate maternal viral load results and infant HIV testing uptake at 6-weeks, and 9-months and 18-months in Rwanda.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Between 2015 and 2022, VLS (< 200 copies/mL) was measured among pregnant women living with HIV (WLHIV) from 38-healthcare facilities. Viral loads (VL) were measured at 6-months, 12-months and 24-months, respectively. For maternal VL, the unit of analysis was visit-pair, and the pairs were created to define those with VL < 200 copies/mL at two consecutive visits as having sustained VLS, persistent viremia (VL ≥ 200 copies/mL at two consecutive visits), viral rebound (VL < 200 copies/mL at prior visit only) and newly suppressed (VL < 200 copies/mL at subsequent visit only). HEI were considered to have persistent HIV testing if they had all three HIV tests. Poisson regression models with generalized estimating equations were used to estimate the adjusted incidence rate ratio (aIRR) and 95%CI for factors associated with sustained VLS and persistent HIV testing.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1145 mother-infant pairs were analyzed. Infant HIV testing uptake at 6- weeks, 9-months and 18-months was 1145 (100.0%), 1089 (95.1%), 1006 (87.9%) respectively. Nine hundred ninety-nine HEI (87.3%) tested for HIV persistently. At 18-months, the incidence of HIV among HEI was 8 (0.7%). Of 1145 mothers, 1076 (94.0%) had ≥ 2 VL results making a total of 2010 visit-pairs (142-single; 934-double visit-pairs). The incidence rate of sustained VLS, persistent viremia, viral rebound and new suppression were 91.0%, 1.3%, 3.6% and 4.0% respectively. Maternal disclosure of HIV status (aIRR = 1.08, 95%CI: 1.02-1.14) was associated with increased likelihood of sustained VLS. Having peer support (aIRR = 1.05 95%CI: 1.01-1.10) was associated with persistent HIV testing among HEI.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Sustained VLS is high among pregnant WLHIV in Rwanda. The low incidence of HIV among HEI may be attributed to high VLS levels. Targeted interventions, including enhanced HIV disclosure and peer support, are crucial for improving sustained VLS and increasing infant HIV testing uptake to reduce MTCT.</p>","PeriodicalId":61903,"journal":{"name":"世界病毒学杂志(英文版)","volume":"14 2","pages":"107322"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12188896/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144509776","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background: The evolutionary mutational changes of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) since its emergence in Chhattisgarh, India in 2020 have warranted the need for the characterization of every lineage/sublineage that has evolved until February 2024.
Aim: To unravel the evolutionary pathway of SARS-CoV-2 in Chhattisgarh from 2020 to February 2024.
Methods: A total of 635 coronavirus disease 2019 cases obtained between 2020 and February 2024 were investigated by whole genome sequencing.
Results: Whole genome sequencing analysis identified the evolution of SARS-CoV-2 into seventeen lineages from 2020 to 2024. SARS-CoV-2 initially emerged in Chhattisgarh in its Alpha (B.1.1.7) variant in 2020. Thereafter, it continuously underwent periodical mutational changes in the spike gene to further differentiate into various lineages/sublineages, viz., Kappa, Delta, BA.1, and BA.2 in 2021; the Omicron lineage (BA.5, BA.2.12.1, BA.2.75, BQ.1, and XBB) in 2022; the new Omicron lineage (XBB.1.5, XBB.1.16, XBB.1.9.1, and XBB.2.3) in 2023; and finally to JN.1 in January and February 2024. The predominant lineages over these 4 years were BA.1.1.7 (Alpha) in 2020, B.1.617.2 (Delta) in the period between 2021 and mid-2022, B.1.1.529 (Omicron) in late 2022 to 2023, and Omicron-JN.1 in early 2024. The presently circulating JN.1 lineage was observed harboring exclusive predominant mutations of E4554K, A570V, P621A, and P1143 L with 99% prevalence.
Conclusion: SARS-CoV-2 from 2020 to 2024 has evolved into 17 lineages/sublineages in Chhattisgarh. The presently circulating JN.1 harbored 40 mutations, especially E554K, A570V, P621S, and P1143 L, capacitating the virus with features of host cell entry, stability, replication, rapid transmissibility, and crucial immune evasion. Therefore, earlier immunity from either vaccination or prior infection may not protect against the current lineage and increases the possibility of future outbreaks. Thus, the periodical genomic surveillance of SARS-CoV-2 is essential for the genomic blueprint of the circulating virus, which may help in updating the vaccine strain and various basic research for developing appropriate therapeutics and diagnostics.
{"title":"Alpha to JN.1 variants: SARS-CoV-2 genomic analysis unfolding its various lineages/sublineages evolved in Chhattisgarh, India from 2020 to 2024.","authors":"Pushpendra Singh, Ruchi Khare, Kuldeep Sharma, Anudita Bhargava, Sanjay Singh Negi","doi":"10.5501/wjv.v14.i2.100001","DOIUrl":"10.5501/wjv.v14.i2.100001","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The evolutionary mutational changes of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) since its emergence in Chhattisgarh, India in 2020 have warranted the need for the characterization of every lineage/sublineage that has evolved until February 2024.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To unravel the evolutionary pathway of SARS-CoV-2 in Chhattisgarh from 2020 to February 2024.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 635 coronavirus disease 2019 cases obtained between 2020 and February 2024 were investigated by whole genome sequencing.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Whole genome sequencing analysis identified the evolution of SARS-CoV-2 into seventeen lineages from 2020 to 2024. SARS-CoV-2 initially emerged in Chhattisgarh in its Alpha (B.1.1.7) variant in 2020. Thereafter, it continuously underwent periodical mutational changes in the spike gene to further differentiate into various lineages/sublineages, viz., Kappa, Delta, BA.1, and BA.2 in 2021; the Omicron lineage (BA.5, BA.2.12.1, BA.2.75, BQ.1, and XBB) in 2022; the new Omicron lineage (XBB.1.5, XBB.1.16, XBB.1.9.1, and XBB.2.3) in 2023; and finally to JN.1 in January and February 2024. The predominant lineages over these 4 years were BA.1.1.7 (Alpha) in 2020, B.1.617.2 (Delta) in the period between 2021 and mid-2022, B.1.1.529 (Omicron) in late 2022 to 2023, and Omicron-JN.1 in early 2024. The presently circulating JN.1 lineage was observed harboring exclusive predominant mutations of E4554K, A570V, P621A, and P1143 L with 99% prevalence.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>SARS-CoV-2 from 2020 to 2024 has evolved into 17 lineages/sublineages in Chhattisgarh. The presently circulating JN.1 harbored 40 mutations, especially E554K, A570V, P621S, and P1143 L, capacitating the virus with features of host cell entry, stability, replication, rapid transmissibility, and crucial immune evasion. Therefore, earlier immunity from either vaccination or prior infection may not protect against the current lineage and increases the possibility of future outbreaks. Thus, the periodical genomic surveillance of SARS-CoV-2 is essential for the genomic blueprint of the circulating virus, which may help in updating the vaccine strain and various basic research for developing appropriate therapeutics and diagnostics.</p>","PeriodicalId":61903,"journal":{"name":"世界病毒学杂志(英文版)","volume":"14 2","pages":"100001"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12188907/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144509761","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}