Acta Cardiologica Sinica最新文献

Background: The cardiac characteristics of Asian female endurance athletes and strength athletes have rarely been investigated.

Methods: This study included 177 Taiwanese young women undergoing military training. Cardiac features were assessed by electrocardiography (ECG) and echocardiography. Then, all participants completed a 3000-meter run to assess endurance capacity, and 89 participants completed a 2-minute push-up test to assess muscular strength. Athletes were those whose exercise performance fell one standard deviation above the mean, and the remaining participants were defined as controls. Multiple logistic regression analysis was used to determine the predictors of the cardiac characteristics of female athletes.

Results: Compared to the female controls, female endurance athletes had a greater QRS duration (ms) (92.12 ± 10.35 vs. 87.26 ± 9.89, p = 0.01) and a higher prevalence of right axis deviation (RAD) (34.9% vs. 11.1%, p < 0.001). There were no differences in any echocardiographic parameters. Greater QRS duration and RAD and lower systolic blood pressure were independent predictors of female endurance athletes [odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals: 1.05 (1.01-1.09), 2.91 (1.12-7.59) and 0.93 (0.88-0.98), respectively]. Female strength athletes had a greater right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT) (mm) (28.06 ± 3.57 vs. 25.38 ± 3.61, p = 0.007) but revealed no differences in ECG variables. Greater RVOT was the only predictor of female strength athletes [OR: 1.26 (1.05-1.50)].

Conclusions: In Asian military women, a wider QRS duration and the presence of RAD in ECG rather than heart structure and function were found to characterize endurance athletes, whereas a wider RVOT but no ECG features were found to characterize strength athletes.

Background: Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) is a critical issue due to poor neurological outcomes and high mortality rate. Severe ischemia and reperfusion injury often occur after cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC). Targeted temperature management (TTM) has been shown to reduce neurological complications among OHCA survivors. However, it is unclear how "time-to-cool" influences clinical outcomes. In this study, we investigated the optimal timing to reach target temperature after cardiac arrest and ROSC.

Methods: A total of 568 adults with OHCA and ROSC were admitted for targeted hypothermia assessment. Several events were predicted, including pneumonia, septic shock, gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding, and death.

Results: One hundred and eighteen patients [70 men (59.32%); 48 women (40.68%)] were analyzed for clinical outcomes. The duration of CPR after ROSC was significantly associated with pneumonia, septic shock, GI bleeding, and mortality after TTM (all p < 0.001). The duration of CPR was also positively correlated with poor outcomes on the Elixhauser score (p = 0.001), APACHE II score (p = 0.008), Cerebral Performance Categories (CPC) scale (p < 0.001), and Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score (p < 0.001). There was a significant association between the duration of CPR and time-to-cool of TTM after ROSC (Pearson value = 0.447, p = 0.001). Pneumonia, septic shock, GI bleeding, and death were significantly higher in the patients who underwent TTM with a time-to-cool exceeding 360 minutes (all p < 0.001).

Conclusions: For cardiac arrest patients, early cooling has clear benefits in reducing clinical sequelae. Clinical outcomes could be improved by improving the time to reach target temperature and feasibility for critically ill patients.

Background: Sacubitril/valsartan has been shown to reduce hospital admissions and even mortality for heart failure. In heart failure and acute coronary syndrome, the effects of sacubitril/valsartan have been studied, but the effect on coronary artery flow is not known.

Objective: We aimed to understand the effect of sacubitril/valsartan on coronary artery flow by using echocardiographic coronary flow reserve (CFR).

Methods: Thirty-six patients (17 ischemic and 19 non-ischemic) with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (EF of < 40%) eligible for sacubitril/valsartan treatment and 21 normal controls were recruited. The study group and controls were similar with regard to gender, smoking status, and age distribution (p = 0.874, p = 0.709, and p = 0.765, respectively). Blood pressure, heart rate, 6-minute walk test (6MWT), N terminal pro B type natriuretic peptide (NT-pro-BNP) level, standard echocardiography, from where left anterior descending mid-distal flow was seen, baseline peak diastolic flow rate and 2 minutes after dipyridamole infusion, and hyperemic peak diastolic flow rate were measured, and CFR with echocardiography was assessed prior to and at 6 months after sacubitril/valsartan initiation.

Results: Baseline peak diastolic flow rate did not exhibit a significant difference at 6 months (p = 0.143), but hyperemic peak diastolic flow rate, CFR, EF (%), and 6MWD values were significantly increased (all p < 0.001), and New York Heart Association Functional Class, NT-pro-BNP (pg/mL), left ventricule end diastolic diameter (mm), and left ventricule end systolic diameter (mm) values were significantly decreased (all p < 0.001) after sacubitril/valsartan treatment.

Conclusions: Sacubitril/valsartan significantly alters coronary blood flow, especially its dynamic features, in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction.

Objectives: To identify the predictors of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) recovery in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and compare the mortality rate between patients with HFrEF and heart failure with improved ejection fraction (HFimpEF).

Methods: Patients in a post-acute care program from 2018 to 2021 were enrolled. A series of echocardiograms were arranged during follow-up. Mortality, cardiovascular death and sudden cardiac death events were recorded. A total of 259 patients were enrolled and followed for at least 1 year; 158 (61%) patients fulfilled the criteria of HFimpEF, 87 (33.6%) were defined as having persistent HFrEF, and 14 (5.4%) were defined as having heart failure with mildly reduced ejection fraction. The patients with HFimpEF and persistent HFrEF were included for analysis.

Results: The mean follow-up duration was 1090 ± 414 days, and the median time to LVEF recovery was 159 days (IQR 112-289 days). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that beta-blocker prescription was the only independent predictor of HFimpEF [odds ratio (OR) 2.11, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.10-4.08, p = 0.03]. Diagnosis of ischemic cardiomyopathy (ICM) and QRS duration ≥ 110 ms were negative predictors of HFimpEF (OR 0.49, 95% CI 0.27-0.88, p = 0.02, and OR 0.4, 95% CI 0.21-0.77, p = 0.005, respectively). The patients with HfimpEF had a significantly better prognosis with lower mortality (hazard ratio 0.2, 95% CI 0.08-0.50, log-rank p < 0.001) than the patients with persistent HFrEF.

Conclusions: Beta-blocker prescription was an independent predictor of HFimpEF, while the diagnosis of ICM and QRS duration ≥ 110 ms were negative predictors of HFimpEF. Patients with HfimpEF had a significantly lower mortality rate compared to those with persistent HFrEF.

Background: The optimal strategy of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for acute myocardial infarction (MI) complicated with cardiogenic shock (CS) remains controversial. We aimed to elucidate the renal and cardiovascular impact of culprit-only (C) revascularization versus additional interventions on non-infarct-related arteries.

Methods: PubMed, Embase, MEDLINE, and Cochrane Library were searched for relevant literature. A total of 96,812 subjects [C-PCI: 69,986; multi-vessel (MV)-PCI: 26,826] in nine studies (one randomized control trial; eight observational cohort studies) were enrolled.

Results: MV-PCI was associated with a higher kidney event rate [relative risk (RR): 1.29, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.12-1.49; p < 0.001]. However, the all-cause mortality rate was comparable both during admission (RR: 1.07, 95% CI: 0.94-1.22; p = 0.30) and at one year (RR: 0.96, 95% CI: 0.79-1.16; p = 0.65). MV-PCI was associated with a greater risk of stroke (RR: 1.19, 95% CI: 1.08-1.32; p < 0.001) and bleeding events (RR: 1.27, 95% CI: 1.07-1.51; p = 0.006), but reduced risk of recurrent MI (RR: 0.89, 95% CI: 0.82-0.97; p = 0.009) and repeat revascularization (RR: 0.34, 95% CI: 0.16-0.71; p = 0.004). No increased risk of coronary artery bypass grafting was present (RR: 1.09, 95% CI: 0.38-3.17; p = 0.87).

Conclusions: C-PCI was associated with a lower rate of renal dysfunction but not all-cause mortality in patients with CS complicating acute MI.

Permanent pacemaker implantation is one of the most effective treatments for chronic arrhythmia. However, there is a certain risk associated with radiation therapy in cancer patients with implantable cardiac pacemakers. To prevent radiotherapy-induced pacemaker failure, there are established medical guidelines for the use of pacemakers in patients undergoing radiotherapy. With advancements in science and technology, the variety of available pacemakers has considerably increased, and radiotherapy equipment has also been updated. Given the variations in irradiation methods and the types of radiation used in clinical practice, there is a pressing need for international consensus on the regulations governing the use of cardiac pacemakers in cancer patients. Currently, many countries lack clinical guidelines for radiotherapy in cancer patients with cardiac pacemakers. This review summarizes recent reports and studies from PubMed (National Center for Biotechnology Information) regarding the safety of radiotherapy in cancer patients with implanted cardiac pacemakers, and provides valuable insights for clinical practice.