ACR Open Rheumatology最新文献

Objective: To evaluate mepolizumab's efficacy in eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis (EGPA) with and without a vasculitic phenotype.

Methods: The MIRRA study (NCT02020889/GSK ID: 115921) included adults with relapsing/refractory EGPA and 4 or more weeks of stable oral glucocorticoids (OG). Patients received mepolizumab (300 mg subcutaneously every 4 weeks) or placebo, plus standard of care for 52 weeks. This post hoc analysis assessed EGPA vasculitic phenotype using antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA) history, baseline Birmingham Vasculitis Activity Score (BVAS), and Vasculitis Damage Index (VDI) score. Coprimary endpoints included accrued remission over 52 weeks and proportion in remission at Week 36 and Week 48. Remission was defined as a BVAS equal to 0 and an OG dose of 4 or more mg/day of a prednisone equivalent. Types of relapses (vasculitis, asthma, and sino-nasal) and EGPA vasculitic characteristics (by study remission status) were also assessed.

Results: A total of 136 patients were included (n = 68, mepolizumab and placebo). Irrespective of history of ANCA positivity status, baseline BVAS, or baseline VDI, the accrued remission duration and the proportion of patients in remission at Weeks 36 and 48 were greater with mepolizumab compared with placebo. With mepolizumab, remission at both Week 36 and Week 48 was achieved by 54% of patients with and 27% of patients without a history of ANCA positivity compared with 0% and 4%, respectively (placebo); 45% of patients with a BVAS of 0 and 22% of patients with BVAS of greater than 0 compared with 5% and 2%, respectively (placebo); and 29% of patients with a VDI score of less than 5 and 37% of patients with a VDI score of 5 or more compared with 6% and 0%, respectively (placebo). Mepolizumab reduced all types of relapses as compared with placebo. Baseline vasculitic characteristics (neuropathy, glomerulonephritis, alveolar hemorrhage, palpable purpura, and ANCA positivity) were generally similar among patients with and without remission.

Conclusion: Mepolizumab is associated with clinical benefits for patients with and without a vasculitic EGPA phenotype.

Objective: To analyze comparative treatment persistence for first-line baricitinib (BARI) versus first-line tumor necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and for first-line BARI initiated as monotherapy versus first-line BARI initiated with at least one conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (csDMARD).

Methods: Patients with RA who initiated BARI or TNFi as first-line biologic or targeted synthetic DMARD from October 1, 2015, to September 30, 2021, were identified in the OPAL data set. Drug survival times to 6, 12, and 24 months were analyzed using restricted mean survival time (RMST). Multiple imputation and inverse probability of treatment weighting were used to address missing data and nonrandom treatment assignment.

Results: A total of 545 patients initiated first-line BARI, including 118 as monotherapy and 427 as csDMARD combination therapy. Three thousand five hundred patients initiated first-line TNFi. There was no difference in drug survival to 6 or 12 months for BARI compared with TNFi; differences in RMST were 0.02 months (95% CI: -0.08 to 0.013; P = 0.65) and 0.31 months (95% CI: -0.02 to 0.63; P = 0.06), respectively. Patients in the BARI group had 1.00 month (95% CI: 0.14 to 1.86; P = 0.02) longer drug survival to 24 months. There was no difference in drug survival for BARI monotherapy compared with combination therapy, with differences in RMST to 6, 12, and 24 months of -0.19 months (95% CI: -0.50 to 0.12; P = 0.12), -0.35 months (95% CI: -1.17 to 0.42; P = 0.41), and -0.56 months (95% CI: -2.66 to 1.54; P = 0.60), respectively.

Conclusion: In this comparative analysis, treatment persistence up to 24 months was significantly longer for first-line BARI compared with TNFi, but the effect size of 1.00 month is not clinically meaningful. There was no difference in persistence for BARI monotherapy versus combination therapy.

Objectives: To investigate the outcomes of COVID-19-related hospitalizations among patients with autoimmune rheumatic diseases (ARDs) in the United States in 2020. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality, and secondary outcomes included intubation rate, length of hospital stay (LOS), and total hospital charges (THCs).

Methods: Data for the study were obtained from the National Inpatient Sample database and included patients who were hospitalized with a principal diagnosis of COVID-19. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses were conducted to calculate odds ratios for the outcomes, adjusting for age, sex, and comorbidities.

Results: Out of the 1,050,720 COVID-19 admissions, 30,775 had an ARD diagnosis. The unadjusted analysis showed higher mortality (12.21%) and intubation (9.2%) rates in the ARD group compared with the non-ARD group (mortality rate: 11.14%, P = 0.013; intubation rate: 8.5%, P = 0.048). However, this difference was not significant after adjusting for confounding factors. The mean LOS and THCs did not differ significantly between the two groups. Among all ARD subgroups, the vasculitis group had significantly higher intubation rate, LOS, and THC.

Conclusion: The study suggests that ARD is not associated with an increased risk of mortality or worse outcomes among patients hospitalized with COVID-19 after adjusting for confounding factors. However, the vasculitis group had poorer outcomes during COVID-19 hospitalizations. Further studies are needed to evaluate the effect of ARD activity and immunosuppressants on outcomes. Additionally, more research is required to investigate the relationship between COVID-19 and vasculitis.

Axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) is a chronic, immune-mediated disease characterized by inflammatory axial skeleton involvement and extra-musculoskeletal manifestations. The continuum of axSpA ranges from nonradiographic axSpA (nr-axSpA) to ankylosing spondylitis, also known as radiographic axSpA; the latter is defined by definitive radiographic sacroiliitis. Human leukocyte antigen B27 (HLA-B27) is a genetic marker strongly associated with axSpA; it aids in the diagnosis of axSpA, and its absence leads to delay in diagnosis. For HLA-B27-negative patients, disease pathogenesis is poorly understood, signs and symptoms are frequently underrecognized, and diagnosis and treatment are commonly delayed. The proportion of HLA-B27-negative patients may be higher among non-White patients and those with nr-axSpA, who can face additional diagnostic challenges related to lack of definitive radiographic sacroiliitis. In this narrative review, we discuss the role of HLA-B27 in the diagnosis and pathogenesis of axSpA and highlight various pathways and genes that may be related to axSpA pathogenesis in HLA-B27-negative patients. We also emphasize the need to characterize gut microbial communities in these patients. Adequate understanding of clinical and pathological features underlying HLA-B27-negative patients with axSpA will improve diagnosis, treatment, and outcomes for this complex inflammatory disease.

Background: Cardiovascular disease is the most common cause of death in people with gout. Acute inflammation, which is a characteristic of gout, may have a mechanistic role in major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs). We aimed to examine the relationship between admissions to a hospital with acute gout and MACEs in a large population-based data set.

Methods: We extracted data from the Hospital Morbidity Data Collection and Death Registrations of the Western Australian Rheumatic Disease Epidemiology Registry. We identified patients admitted to hospital with incident acute gout and who had admissions or a death record because of MACEs. We compared the risk of MACEs during the postdischarge period (1-30 days after acute gout admission) and control period (365 days prior to admission and 365 days after the postdischarge period) using a self-controlled case-series (SCCS) design, which is a within-person design that controls for time-invariant patient-specific confounding. We performed conditional fixed-effects Poisson regression to obtain rate ratios (RRs).

Results: We identified 941 patients (average age: 76.4 years; SD: 12.6; 66.7% male) with an incident acute gout admission and documented MACEs during the control and/or postdischarge periods. Of the 941 patients, 898 (95%) experienced MACEs during the combined control period (730-day period) and 112 (12%) during the postdischarge period (30-day period). The rates of MACEs during the total control and postdischarge periods were 0.84 and 1.45 events per person-year, respectively. Regression analysis confirmed increased rate during the postdischarge period (RR: 1.67; 95% CI: 1.38-2.03) compared with the control period. Sensitivity analyses indicated that our results were robust in relation to known limitations of the SCCS design.

Conclusion: We report an increased risk of MACEs in the first 30 days after an incident hospital admission with acute gout, suggesting a temporal association between acute inflammation and subsequent MACEs in patients with gout.

Objective: To characterize health care resource utilization (HCRU), health care costs, and adverse events (AEs) among patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) initiating oral corticosteroids (OCS) versus patients without OCS use.

Methods: In this retrospective cohort study (GSK Study 213061), eligible patients (aged ≥5 years at first OCS claim) with SLE from the IQVIA Real-World Data Adjudicated Claims-US database (January 2006 to July 2019) had continuous enrollment during the 6-month preindex (baseline) and 12-month postindex (observation) periods and one or more inpatient or emergency department SLE diagnosis codes or two or more outpatient SLE diagnosis codes during baseline. The "OCS-initiator cohort" comprised patients with one or more OCS pharmacy claims during the study period and no evidence of preindex OCS use and was classified into three exposure categories based on the number of 6-month periods of more than 5 mg/day of OCS use (0, 1, 2). The "no-OCS-use cohort" comprised patients without OCS claims, although patients may have received OCS prior to the study period. Clinical and economic outcomes were reported over the observation period.

Results: Adjusted health care costs differed significantly ($6542 [95% confidence interval (CI): $5761-$7368], $19,149 [95% CI: $16,954-$21,471], $28,985 [95% CI: $25,546-$32,885]). HCRU incidence rates were significantly greater for all OCS-initiator exposure categories (n = 16,216) versus the no-OCS-use cohort (n = 11,137; adjusted incidence rate ratios [95% CI]: 1.22 [1.19-1.24], 1.39 [1.34-1.43], 1.66 [1.60-1.73]). OCS-related AEs were experienced by 67.1% to 74.1% of patients with OCS initiation, most commonly affecting the immune system.

Conclusion: Within 12 months of OCS initiation, patients with SLE experienced substantial clinical and economic burden, which may imply a need to minimize OCS use.

Objective: Patients with autoimmune rheumatic diseases (ARDs) are at greater risk of COVID-19 infection and hospitalization, increasing the stress and uncertainty already associated with unpredictable conditions. These may be heightened for patients with ARDs from underrepresented minority backgrounds. This study aimed to explore patient experiences and ARD-related challenges during the first year of the pandemic.

Methods: Between December 2020 and May 2021, 60-minute semistructured interviews were conducted with English- and Spanish-speaking adults, aged 18 years or older with self-reported diagnosis of ARD, via phone or videoconferencing using an interview guide on living with an ARD during the pandemic. Analysis combined methods of phenomenology and content analysis through three steps: 1) summarizing interviews, 2) iteratively refining units of meaning, and 3) axial and selective coding to determine cross-cutting themes. Study procedures were conducted by a multidisciplinary team, a majority also diagnosed with ARDs.

Results: The research team interviewed 22 patients (39.8 ± 15.7 years old; 82.8% female; 31.8% Hispanic or Latino/a/x) with ARDs. Themes included 1) information access and understanding, 2) problem solving access to health care, 3) balancing risks, and 4) mental health implications. Within these themes, patients from underrepresented minority backgrounds faced unique challenges.

Conclusion: Patients with ARDs require direct and timely communication about their risk of COVID-19 morbidity and mortality and require increased support for psychosocial and ARD-related implications of the pandemic. Health care systems must consider ways to support patients who are balancing chronic disease management with risk reduction for contracting emerging COVID-19 variants.