Acta Clinica Belgica最新文献

Objectives: During hospitalisation, physical inactivity is common among older patients and is associated with adverse outcomes, e.g. functional decline. This study identified barriers and facilitators of physical activity with geriatric patients during hospital admission.

Methods: This is a cross-sectional descriptive study, on two acute geriatric units and one rehabilitation unit, using a researcher-administered survey methodology in patients 70 years or older. A new questionnaire was developed based on a literature review, and was administered bedside and face-to-face with the older patients.

Results: 72 patients, mean age 83.6 years, completed the questionnaire. 88.9% of the participants found physical activity important during hospitalisation. The main patient-related determinants were fear of falling and symptoms of current illness (e.g. pain). The main environmental-related determinants were the presence of medical devices, and the availability of walking aids. Half of the patients felt motivated by the hospital staff, and one out of six participants felt discouraged. Receiving more assistance for walking and having access to other types of physical activity was expected to increase physical activity. Additionally, motivation from family would be a facilitator for 44.4% of the participants.

Conclusion: Promoting physical activity on acute geriatric units will require interventions at different levels. Most importantly, focusing on interpersonal motivators and positive reinforcement by hospital staff could be beneficial strategies to increase the physical activity of older hospitalised patients.

Objectives: Teriparatide (TPD) is an osteoanabolic agent used in patients with high osteoporotic fracture risk. Predictors of therapeutic response to TPD in real-life setting are not well characterised. This study investigated the influence of previous antiresorptive therapy, age and other patient characteristics on the skeletal response to TPD.

Methods: Retrospective study at the metabolic bone clinic, University Hospitals Leuven, Belgium. Patients with osteoporosis and a high fracture burden received TPD for 9-18 months. Bone mineral density (BMD) was measured at baseline, 9 and 18 months at lumbar spine (LS), femoral neck (FN) and total hip (TH).

Results: BMD at LS increased at 9 months (change mean (standard error) 6.8 % (0.7) p < 0.001) and at 18 months (8.0 % (0.9) p < 0.001), while BMD at FN and TH did not change significantly. Non-response in BMD change at the LS was seen with prior denosumab use (odds ratio 0.21, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.049-0.912, p = 0.037). Changes in BMD at TH were significantly greater in younger patients and in patients with a lower baseline BMD.

Conclusion: TPD-induced changes in BMD at TH might depend on age and baseline BMD and at LS on prior denosumab use. The results suggest that these factors may be relevant for clinical decision making when initiating TPD treatment, although larger studies are needed to confirm these findings.

COVID-19 is associated with an increased risk for thrombotic complications. The trials investigating the optimal thromboprophylactic dose are performed in challenging times and seemingly produce conflicting evidence. The burdensome circumstances, divergent endpoints, and different analytical approaches hamper comparison and extrapolation of available evidence. Most importantly, clinicians should provide thromboprophylaxis in hospitalized COVID-19 patients while (re)assessing bleeding and thrombotic risk frequently. The COVID-19 Thromboprophylaxis Working Group of the BSTH updated its guidance document. It aims to summarize the available evidence critically and to guide clinicians in providing the best possible thromboprophylaxis.

Introduction: Hereditary angioedema (HAE) is a rare disorder characterized by unpredictable painful and potentially life-threatening swelling episodes. The international WAO/EAACI guideline on the diagnosis and management of HAE was recently updated and provides up-to-date guidance for the management of. In this paper, we assessed to what extent the Belgian clinical practice was aligned with the revised guideline, and whether there were opportunities to optimise Belgian clinical practice in HAE.

Methods: We compared the updated international guideline for HAE with information we acquired on Belgian clinical practice, a Belgian patient registry and expert opinion analysis. The Belgian patient registry was developed with the involvement of eight Belgian reference centers for HAE patients. Eight Belgian experts, physicians in the participating centers, included patients in the patient registry and participated in the expert opinion analysis.

Results: The main action points to further optimise the Belgian clinical practice of HAE are Work towards total disease control and normalize patients' life by considering the use of new and innovative long-term prophylactic treatment options; (2) inform C1-INH-HAE patients about new long-term prophylactic therapies; (3) assure the availability of on-demand therapy for all C1-INH-HAE patients; (4) implement a more universally used assessment including multiple aspects of the disease (e.g. quality of life assessment) in daily clinical practice; and (5) continue and expand an existing patient registry to assure continued data availability on C1-INH-HAE in Belgium.

Conclusions: In light of the updated WAO/EAACI guideline, five action points were identified and several other suggestions were made to optimise the Belgian clinical practice in C1-INH-HAE.

Objectives: Albuminuria is a significant biomarker of various kidney diseases and is associated with renal outcome. Recently, caffeine intake has shown potential renoprotective effects. However, the relationship between caffeine intake and albuminuria remains profoundly elusive.

Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional study aimed to explore the association between caffeine intake and albuminuria in the American adult population using the data acquired from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2005-2016. Caffeine intake was assessed by 24-h dietary recalls, and albuminuria was assessed by albumin-to-creatinine ratio. Multivariate logistic regression was performed to explore the independent association between caffeine intake and albuminuria. Subgroup analysis and interaction tests were also conducted.

Results: Among 23,060 participants, 11.8% of the individuals exhibited albuminuria, and the prevalence of albuminuria decreased with higher caffeine intake tertiles (Tertile 1: 13%; Tertile 2: 11.9%; Tertile 3: 10.5%; P < 0.001). After adjusted potential confounders, the results of logistic regression indicated that a higher caffeine intake was associated with a decreased risk of albuminuria (OR = 0.903; 95% CI: 0.84, 0.97; P = 0.007), especially in females and the participants aged <60 years and chronic kidney disease stage II.

Conclusion: The present study first indicated an inverse correlation between caffeine intake and albuminuria, which further confirmed the potentially protective effects of caffeine on the kidney.

Objectives: The aims of this study are to evaluate the early adherence to CPAP treatment in patients aged 65 years and older and to compare ambulatory (ACPAP) and in-hospital (HCPAP) management in starting CPAP treatment.

Methods: Adherence to CPAP therapy at 3 months was retrospectively studied in patients on whom CPAP therapy was initiated between 1 January 2020 and 31 December 2021. Patients in the ACPAP group were selected based on the current Belgian reimbursement criteria (OAHI ≥30/h and few comorbidities).

Results: 146 patients were studied (median OAHI 43.35/h [32.02; 57.40]; median age 69 [67.0; 73.0]): 116 (79.5%) patients in the HCPAP and 30 (20.5%) in the ACPAP group. Based on an adherence threshold of average CPAP use of ≥ 4 hours per day, 120 (82%) patients were adherent to the treatment; 94 (81%) patients in the HCPAP and 26 (86.7%) in the ACPAP group. The median CPAP use for the total population was 6.4 h/day [4.89; 7.34], reaching 6.3 h/d [4.79; 7.15] for the HCPAP group and 6.8 h/d [6.21; 8.06] for the ACPAP group (p = 0.019). Insomnia was a significant risk factor for non-adherence (OR 5.16 [1.64; 16.08], p = 0.0043) but the ACPAP method was not (OR 0.66 [0.18; 1.91], p = 0.4748).

Conclusion: Early CPAP adherence in patients ≥ 65 years old was good in terms of average use per day and proportion of adherent patients. ACPAP method was not a risk factor for lower CPAP adherence in patients presenting severe OSAS (OAHI ≥30/h) and few comorbidities.