Pub Date : 2025-02-09DOI: 10.2340/1651-226X.2025.42525
Jonas Nahavandipour, Christoffer Johansen, Annamaria Giraldi, Bolette Skjøft Rafn, Annika Von Heymann
Background and purpose: Many men with cancer experience that changes created by cancer and its treatment may impair sexual function. However, many studies investigating sexual impairments fail to consider whether such impairments are perceived as distressing, i.e. create sexual distress. We investigated the prevalence of sexual distress, overlap with sexual impairment, and sociodemographic and clinical characteristics and other symptoms associated with sexual distress in a heterogeneous male cancer population.
Patients and methods: Across cancer diagnoses, 2792 men in treatment or follow up at the Department of Oncology, Rigshospitalet, were invited. The Sexual Complaint Screener (SCS) assessed sexual impairments and sexual distress. Regression analyses estimated the association of sexual distress with sociodemographic and tumor-related factors, other symptoms (pain, depression, fatigue, insomnia, fear of recurrence), and health-related quality of life. The number of patients who received help for or were interested in a consultation for sexual problems was calculated.
Results: Six hundred and ninety-six patients, most frequently diagnosed with testicular (26%) or multiple (16%) cancers, completed the SCS. Forty-one per cent experienced sexual distress, 60% sexual impairment, and 34% overlapping sexual distress and impairment. Sexual distress was significantly associated with clinically relevant insomnia (OR:2.15; 95% CI:1.5-3.1) and pain (OR:1.90; 95% CI:1.3-2.9). Two thirds of all patients wished for help, but only one third of these were receiving help.
Interpretation: Sexual distress was widespread in men across different cancer diagnoses and sometimes presented without impairment, demonstrating that assessment of sexual problems must include the personal experience of distress and extend to men across cancer diagnoses.
{"title":"Sexual distress among men with cancer - a cross-sectional study.","authors":"Jonas Nahavandipour, Christoffer Johansen, Annamaria Giraldi, Bolette Skjøft Rafn, Annika Von Heymann","doi":"10.2340/1651-226X.2025.42525","DOIUrl":"10.2340/1651-226X.2025.42525","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong>Many men with cancer experience that changes created by cancer and its treatment may impair sexual function. However, many studies investigating sexual impairments fail to consider whether such impairments are perceived as distressing, i.e. create sexual distress. We investigated the prevalence of sexual distress, overlap with sexual impairment, and sociodemographic and clinical characteristics and other symptoms associated with sexual distress in a heterogeneous male cancer population.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>Across cancer diagnoses, 2792 men in treatment or follow up at the Department of Oncology, Rigshospitalet, were invited. The Sexual Complaint Screener (SCS) assessed sexual impairments and sexual distress. Regression analyses estimated the association of sexual distress with sociodemographic and tumor-related factors, other symptoms (pain, depression, fatigue, insomnia, fear of recurrence), and health-related quality of life. The number of patients who received help for or were interested in a consultation for sexual problems was calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Six hundred and ninety-six patients, most frequently diagnosed with testicular (26%) or multiple (16%) cancers, completed the SCS. Forty-one per cent experienced sexual distress, 60% sexual impairment, and 34% overlapping sexual distress and impairment. Sexual distress was significantly associated with clinically relevant insomnia (OR:2.15; 95% CI:1.5-3.1) and pain (OR:1.90; 95% CI:1.3-2.9). Two thirds of all patients wished for help, but only one third of these were receiving help.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>Sexual distress was widespread in men across different cancer diagnoses and sometimes presented without impairment, demonstrating that assessment of sexual problems must include the personal experience of distress and extend to men across cancer diagnoses.</p>","PeriodicalId":7110,"journal":{"name":"Acta Oncologica","volume":"64 ","pages":"214-221"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2025-02-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11833328/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143381500","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-02-05DOI: 10.2340/1651-226X.2025.42292
Daniel Hunde, Niklas Ekerstad, Mihaela Asp, Päivi Kannisto, Madelene Wedin, Charlotte Palmqvist, Pernilla Dahm-Kähler, Yvonne Brandberg, Mirna Abraham-Nordling, Kristina Åhlund, Vilhelm Mörlin, Nina Groes-Kofoed, Sahar Salehi
Background and purpose: There is an urgent need to improve patient-selection to surgical treatment in advanced ovarian cancer as our results showed that cytoreductive surgery was without effect or even detrimental in a yet unknown subgroup of women. With an ageing population, 30% of women with advanced ovarian cancer in Sweden are >75 years. Nevertheless, there are no recommendations on patient-selection, albeit treating an unselected population in a public and centralized health care setting. Little attention has been placed on frailty assessments in oncology, despite their potential to stratify the risk of adverse outcome and mortality. Consequently, we hypothesize that frailty is a predictor of poor survival.
Patients and methods: In this Swedish multi-centre prospective cohort study, where the exposure is frailty, consecutive women with advanced ovarian cancer scheduled for surgery with curative intent are eligible for inclusion. Three different frailty instruments are evaluated preoperatively, blinded to the caregiver. The primary outcome is 2-year overall survival. With a fixed sample size of 450 patients, a two-sided α of 0.05 and β of 0.20, the study is powered to detect a difference in 2-year survival of 12.5% by frailty, assuming a 20% prevalence of frailty. The result of the study will have a direct impact on clinical management and patient-selection as the results are expected to have a high external validity. Total study-time is 5 years, with 3 years of accrual. All participating centres started accrual by September 2024. Presentation of data on primary outcome is expected 2029.
Study registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT06298877.
{"title":"Determining the effect of frailty on survival in advanced ovarian cancer: study protocol for a prospective multicentre national cohort study (FOLERO).","authors":"Daniel Hunde, Niklas Ekerstad, Mihaela Asp, Päivi Kannisto, Madelene Wedin, Charlotte Palmqvist, Pernilla Dahm-Kähler, Yvonne Brandberg, Mirna Abraham-Nordling, Kristina Åhlund, Vilhelm Mörlin, Nina Groes-Kofoed, Sahar Salehi","doi":"10.2340/1651-226X.2025.42292","DOIUrl":"10.2340/1651-226X.2025.42292","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong>There is an urgent need to improve patient-selection to surgical treatment in advanced ovarian cancer as our results showed that cytoreductive surgery was without effect or even detrimental in a yet unknown subgroup of women. With an ageing population, 30% of women with advanced ovarian cancer in Sweden are >75 years. Nevertheless, there are no recommendations on patient-selection, albeit treating an unselected population in a public and centralized health care setting. Little attention has been placed on frailty assessments in oncology, despite their potential to stratify the risk of adverse outcome and mortality. Consequently, we hypothesize that frailty is a predictor of poor survival.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>In this Swedish multi-centre prospective cohort study, where the exposure is frailty, consecutive women with advanced ovarian cancer scheduled for surgery with curative intent are eligible for inclusion. Three different frailty instruments are evaluated preoperatively, blinded to the caregiver. The primary outcome is 2-year overall survival. With a fixed sample size of 450 patients, a two-sided α of 0.05 and β of 0.20, the study is powered to detect a difference in 2-year survival of 12.5% by frailty, assuming a 20% prevalence of frailty. The result of the study will have a direct impact on clinical management and patient-selection as the results are expected to have a high external validity. Total study-time is 5 years, with 3 years of accrual. All participating centres started accrual by September 2024. Presentation of data on primary outcome is expected 2029.</p><p><strong>Study registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov NCT06298877.</p>","PeriodicalId":7110,"journal":{"name":"Acta Oncologica","volume":"64 ","pages":"208-213"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2025-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11816292/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143187907","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background: Assessment of cardiac disease before cancer therapy is crucial, as advancements in cancer treatment have led to prolonged survival and an increase in cardiovascular complications. Specifically, esophageal cancer and heart disease share common risk factors, such as smoking and obesity. Radiation therapy (RT) for esophageal cancer is associated with elevated cardiac radiation exposure. This study aimed to assess the prevalence of coronary artery disease (CAD) in patients with esophageal cancer who were eligible for RT.
Methods: We examined the prevalence of coronary artery stenosis, abnormal myocardial perfusion, and late enhancement using pre-RT cardiac computed tomography (CT) data of 41 patients with thoracic esophageal cancer who were referred for RT between January 2017 and June 2023 and had no history of ischemic heart disease.
Results: The median age of the 41 patients was 71 years, with 40 patients being male. Cardiac CT identified significant coronary stenosis (≥50% luminal narrowing) in 18 patients (44%), among whom 9 (50%) had severe stenosis, multivessel disease, or myocardial ischemia. Significant stenosis was most frequently observed in the left anterior descending artery (16/18). Late enhancement, indicating myocardial infarction, was observed in seven patients (17%).
Interpretation: Patients with esophageal cancer without a history of ischemic heart disease had a high prevalence (44%) of CAD, with half of them having severe stenosis, multivessel disease, or myocardial ischemia. Given the high prevalence of coronary stenosis, pre-treatment cardiac evaluation is crucial for patients with esophageal cancer. Incorporating cardiac CT findings into radiotherapy planning is recommended to optimize patient care.
{"title":"Cardiac CT reveals high prevalence of coronary artery disease in esophageal cancer eligible for radiotherapy.","authors":"Akinori Takada, Satoshi Nakamura, Yutaka Toyomasu, Takamitsu Mase, Tomoko Kawamura, Suguru Araki, Yoshitaka Suzuki, Masaki Ohi, Hajime Sakuma, Yoshihito Nomoto, Kakuya Kitagawa","doi":"10.2340/1651-226X.2025.42563","DOIUrl":"10.2340/1651-226X.2025.42563","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Assessment of cardiac disease before cancer therapy is crucial, as advancements in cancer treatment have led to prolonged survival and an increase in cardiovascular complications. Specifically, esophageal cancer and heart disease share common risk factors, such as smoking and obesity. Radiation therapy (RT) for esophageal cancer is associated with elevated cardiac radiation exposure. This study aimed to assess the prevalence of coronary artery disease (CAD) in patients with esophageal cancer who were eligible for RT.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We examined the prevalence of coronary artery stenosis, abnormal myocardial perfusion, and late enhancement using pre-RT cardiac computed tomography (CT) data of 41 patients with thoracic esophageal cancer who were referred for RT between January 2017 and June 2023 and had no history of ischemic heart disease.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median age of the 41 patients was 71 years, with 40 patients being male. Cardiac CT identified significant coronary stenosis (≥50% luminal narrowing) in 18 patients (44%), among whom 9 (50%) had severe stenosis, multivessel disease, or myocardial ischemia. Significant stenosis was most frequently observed in the left anterior descending artery (16/18). Late enhancement, indicating myocardial infarction, was observed in seven patients (17%).</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>Patients with esophageal cancer without a history of ischemic heart disease had a high prevalence (44%) of CAD, with half of them having severe stenosis, multivessel disease, or myocardial ischemia. Given the high prevalence of coronary stenosis, pre-treatment cardiac evaluation is crucial for patients with esophageal cancer. Incorporating cardiac CT findings into radiotherapy planning is recommended to optimize patient care.</p>","PeriodicalId":7110,"journal":{"name":"Acta Oncologica","volume":"64 ","pages":"200-207"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2025-02-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11811530/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143077902","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-31DOI: 10.2340/1651-226X.2025.42281
Niklas B Lindahl, Jakob Lauritsen, Thomas Wagner, Gedske Daugaard, Mikkel Bandak
Background and purpose: Active surveillance is a recommended management strategy for patients with clinical stage I (CSI) seminoma. This study aims to identify patterns of relapse detection methods in an unselected population-based cohort of CSI patients and provide evidence for a risk-adapted follow-up program.
Patients/materials and methods: A total of 924 patients with CSI seminoma were identified in the prospective Danish Testicular Cancer database. Retrospectively collected clinical data were used for descriptive analyses of patterns in detection methods. Additionally, we explored a risk-adapted surveillance approach based on recently identified risk factors for relapse, classifying patients into low- and non-low-risk groups.
Results: At 60 months, the 5-year cumulative relapse risk was 16%, with 146 relapses during surveillance. Relapses were detected by imaging alone in 71% of cases, imaging combined with elevated serum tumor markers (STMs) in 18%, isolated elevation of STMs in 8%, and by self-referral due to symptoms in 3%. No relapses were detected by abnormal findings at a physical examination. In total, 134 (92%) relapses were localized to retroperitoneal lymph nodes, primarily without additional spread. The 5-year relapse risk in patients with low risk of relapse was 9% compared to 28% in patients in the non-low-risk group.
Interpretation: This study highlights that the surveillance program can detect relapses at an early stage. Reduction of visits and omission of routine physical examinations can safely be considered for patients with a low risk of relapse, while further research is needed to optimize follow-up and treatment for patients at higher risk of relapse.
{"title":"Relapse detection in the Danish surveillance program of patients with clinical stage I seminoma: a nationwide study.","authors":"Niklas B Lindahl, Jakob Lauritsen, Thomas Wagner, Gedske Daugaard, Mikkel Bandak","doi":"10.2340/1651-226X.2025.42281","DOIUrl":"10.2340/1651-226X.2025.42281","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong>Active surveillance is a recommended management strategy for patients with clinical stage I (CSI) seminoma. This study aims to identify patterns of relapse detection methods in an unselected population-based cohort of CSI patients and provide evidence for a risk-adapted follow-up program.</p><p><strong>Patients/materials and methods: </strong>A total of 924 patients with CSI seminoma were identified in the prospective Danish Testicular Cancer database. Retrospectively collected clinical data were used for descriptive analyses of patterns in detection methods. Additionally, we explored a risk-adapted surveillance approach based on recently identified risk factors for relapse, classifying patients into low- and non-low-risk groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At 60 months, the 5-year cumulative relapse risk was 16%, with 146 relapses during surveillance. Relapses were detected by imaging alone in 71% of cases, imaging combined with elevated serum tumor markers (STMs) in 18%, isolated elevation of STMs in 8%, and by self-referral due to symptoms in 3%. No relapses were detected by abnormal findings at a physical examination. In total, 134 (92%) relapses were localized to retroperitoneal lymph nodes, primarily without additional spread. The 5-year relapse risk in patients with low risk of relapse was 9% compared to 28% in patients in the non-low-risk group.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>This study highlights that the surveillance program can detect relapses at an early stage. Reduction of visits and omission of routine physical examinations can safely be considered for patients with a low risk of relapse, while further research is needed to optimize follow-up and treatment for patients at higher risk of relapse.</p>","PeriodicalId":7110,"journal":{"name":"Acta Oncologica","volume":"64 ","pages":"191-199"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2025-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11811535/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143063165","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-31DOI: 10.2340/1651-226X.2025.41957
Katla R Kluvers, Thordur Tryggvason, Vigdis Stefansdottir, Jon G Jonasson, Petur Snaebjornsson, Sigurdis Haraldsdottir
Background and purpose: Screening for Lynch syndrome (LS) with mismatch repair (MMR) protein immunohistochemistry (IHC) in all patients with newly diagnosed colorectal (CRC) and endometrial cancer (EC) was implemented in Iceland in 2017. The aim of the study is to assess the accuracy of screening in 2020-2022 and compare it to 2017-2019 when screening was initiated.
Patients/materials and methods: All patients diagnosed with CRC and EC according to the Icelandic Cancer Registry in 2020-2022 were included. Screening results were crossmatched with a genotyping database from deCODE to calculate sensitivity and specificity for LS detection. Results: In 2020-2022, 429 of 522 (82%) diagnosed CRCs were stained and 90 of 106 (85%) ECs, compared to 74% of CRCs and 82% of ECs in 2017-2019. The screening protocol was followed in 90% of cases for CRCs and 95% of cases for ECs compared to 89% and 68% during 2017-2019. The sensitivity of IHC as a screening method for LS was 70% and specificity 88% with a positive and negative predictive value of 8.4% and 99.4%, respectively.
Interpretation: Three LS cases were missed with MMR IHC (1 MSH6 and 2 PMS2 carriers), it is possible these patients had sporadic cancers unrelated to their LS carrier status. MSH6 and PMS2 deficiency strongly predicts LS in Iceland.
{"title":"Lynch syndrome screening in colorectal and endometrial cancers in Iceland.","authors":"Katla R Kluvers, Thordur Tryggvason, Vigdis Stefansdottir, Jon G Jonasson, Petur Snaebjornsson, Sigurdis Haraldsdottir","doi":"10.2340/1651-226X.2025.41957","DOIUrl":"10.2340/1651-226X.2025.41957","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong>Screening for Lynch syndrome (LS) with mismatch repair (MMR) protein immunohistochemistry (IHC) in all patients with newly diagnosed colorectal (CRC) and endometrial cancer (EC) was implemented in Iceland in 2017. The aim of the study is to assess the accuracy of screening in 2020-2022 and compare it to 2017-2019 when screening was initiated.</p><p><strong>Patients/materials and methods: </strong>All patients diagnosed with CRC and EC according to the Icelandic Cancer Registry in 2020-2022 were included. Screening results were crossmatched with a genotyping database from deCODE to calculate sensitivity and specificity for LS detection. Results: In 2020-2022, 429 of 522 (82%) diagnosed CRCs were stained and 90 of 106 (85%) ECs, compared to 74% of CRCs and 82% of ECs in 2017-2019. The screening protocol was followed in 90% of cases for CRCs and 95% of cases for ECs compared to 89% and 68% during 2017-2019. The sensitivity of IHC as a screening method for LS was 70% and specificity 88% with a positive and negative predictive value of 8.4% and 99.4%, respectively.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>Three LS cases were missed with MMR IHC (1 MSH6 and 2 PMS2 carriers), it is possible these patients had sporadic cancers unrelated to their LS carrier status. MSH6 and PMS2 deficiency strongly predicts LS in Iceland.</p>","PeriodicalId":7110,"journal":{"name":"Acta Oncologica","volume":"64 ","pages":"188-190"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2025-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11811529/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143063133","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-29DOI: 10.2340/1651-226X.2025.42173
Antti Rannikko, Olivia Hölsä, Trude Ågesen, Mattias Ekman, Riikka Mattila
Background: Metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) treatment is advancing yet Nordic, real-world evidence for its use is scarce. In this population-based cohort study, we describe characteristics of patients with mCRPC, and their treatment patterns and survival outcomes in Finland.
Methods: Incident patients with mCRPC diagnosed during 2013-2021 were identified from data lakes in two large and representative, Finnish hospital districts, and linked to data on drug purchases and causes of death from national registries.
Results: Of a total of 31,307 patients with prostate cancer, 2,475 progressed to mCRPC during 2013-2021. Those who received no life-prolonging treatment(s) (28% overall) were older with more comorbidities than treated patients. After 2018, the proportion of patients who received life-prolonging treatments increased from 61% to 80%. Of those who received treatment before androgen receptor pathway inhibitors (ARPIs) were reimbursed as first-line (1L) treatment for mCRPC in Finland, 68% received docetaxel, 19% abiraterone and 12% enzalutamide 1L; post-reimbursement, 4% received docetaxel, 24% abiraterone and 71% enzalutamide 1L. Median overall survival for treated patients with mCRPC was 28.3 (95% CI: 26.3-30.4) and 38.5 (95% CI: 32.7-42.1) months pre- and post-reimbursement of 1L-ARPIs, respectively.
Interpretation: The ARPI reimbursement status changes significantly influenced treatment patterns for mCRPC in Finland, favouring enzalutamide over docetaxel. This expanded the pool of men eligible for 1L treatment and improved overall survival by a median of 10 months. These findings highlight the importance of health policy decisions in shaping treatment strategies and patient outcomes in prostate cancer.
{"title":"Real-world treatment patterns and survival outcomes in men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer in Finland: a national, population-based cohort study.","authors":"Antti Rannikko, Olivia Hölsä, Trude Ågesen, Mattias Ekman, Riikka Mattila","doi":"10.2340/1651-226X.2025.42173","DOIUrl":"10.2340/1651-226X.2025.42173","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) treatment is advancing yet Nordic, real-world evidence for its use is scarce. In this population-based cohort study, we describe characteristics of patients with mCRPC, and their treatment patterns and survival outcomes in Finland.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Incident patients with mCRPC diagnosed during 2013-2021 were identified from data lakes in two large and representative, Finnish hospital districts, and linked to data on drug purchases and causes of death from national registries.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of a total of 31,307 patients with prostate cancer, 2,475 progressed to mCRPC during 2013-2021. Those who received no life-prolonging treatment(s) (28% overall) were older with more comorbidities than treated patients. After 2018, the proportion of patients who received life-prolonging treatments increased from 61% to 80%. Of those who received treatment before androgen receptor pathway inhibitors (ARPIs) were reimbursed as first-line (1L) treatment for mCRPC in Finland, 68% received docetaxel, 19% abiraterone and 12% enzalutamide 1L; post-reimbursement, 4% received docetaxel, 24% abiraterone and 71% enzalutamide 1L. Median overall survival for treated patients with mCRPC was 28.3 (95% CI: 26.3-30.4) and 38.5 (95% CI: 32.7-42.1) months pre- and post-reimbursement of 1L-ARPIs, respectively.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>The ARPI reimbursement status changes significantly influenced treatment patterns for mCRPC in Finland, favouring enzalutamide over docetaxel. This expanded the pool of men eligible for 1L treatment and improved overall survival by a median of 10 months. These findings highlight the importance of health policy decisions in shaping treatment strategies and patient outcomes in prostate cancer.</p>","PeriodicalId":7110,"journal":{"name":"Acta Oncologica","volume":"64 ","pages":"173-178"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2025-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11808809/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143063149","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-29DOI: 10.2340/1651-226X.2025.42131
Fie Stegenborg, Mathilde Bek, Charlotte Nilsson, Line H Pedersen, Thomas Scheike, Lisa Hjalgrim, Friederike Erdmann, Kjeld Schmiegelow, Pernille Bidstrup, Line Kenborg, Jeanette Winther, Hanne Larsen, Susanne Dalton
Background and purpose: Over the past decades, childhood cancer survival has increased substantially in Europe, including Denmark. However, families with fewer social resources may have benefitted less from these improvements. In this nationwide register-based study, we assessed associations between parental socioeconomic position (SEP) and 5-year relapse-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) in childhood cancer patients.
Material and methods: All children aged <16 years diagnosed with cancer in Denmark between 1998 and 2017 were identified in the Danish Childhood Cancer Registry (N = 3245). Parents, with whom the children resided, were identified, and data on the parents' education, cohabitation status, affiliation to work market, country of origin, and vital status of the children were obtained through individual-level linkage across Danish nationwide registries. Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate the association between SEP indicators and 5-year RFS and OS.
Results and interpretation: Tendencies towards lower 5-year RFS and OS were observed among children whose parents were unemployed/not in workforce (RFS: HR [hazard ratio] = 1.14, 95% CI [confidence interval]: 0.90-1.45, OS: HR = 1.28, 95% CI: 0.95-1.71) or from non-Western countries (RFS: HR = 1.21 95% CI: 0.96-1.52, OS: HR = 1.44, 95% CI: 1.09-1.90). Results by diagnostic groups revealed particularly low OS for children with non-central nervous system tumors whose parents were from non-Western countries (HR = 1.92, 95% CI: 1.24-2.97). Targeted strategies are needed to promote social equity and ensure optimal diagnosis, care, and management of childhood cancer across social groups.
{"title":"Socioeconomic characteristics and relapse-free and overall survival from childhood cancer - a nationwide study based on data from the Danish Childhood Cancer Registry.","authors":"Fie Stegenborg, Mathilde Bek, Charlotte Nilsson, Line H Pedersen, Thomas Scheike, Lisa Hjalgrim, Friederike Erdmann, Kjeld Schmiegelow, Pernille Bidstrup, Line Kenborg, Jeanette Winther, Hanne Larsen, Susanne Dalton","doi":"10.2340/1651-226X.2025.42131","DOIUrl":"10.2340/1651-226X.2025.42131","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong>Over the past decades, childhood cancer survival has increased substantially in Europe, including Denmark. However, families with fewer social resources may have benefitted less from these improvements. In this nationwide register-based study, we assessed associations between parental socioeconomic position (SEP) and 5-year relapse-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) in childhood cancer patients.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>All children aged <16 years diagnosed with cancer in Denmark between 1998 and 2017 were identified in the Danish Childhood Cancer Registry (N = 3245). Parents, with whom the children resided, were identified, and data on the parents' education, cohabitation status, affiliation to work market, country of origin, and vital status of the children were obtained through individual-level linkage across Danish nationwide registries. Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate the association between SEP indicators and 5-year RFS and OS.</p><p><strong>Results and interpretation: </strong>Tendencies towards lower 5-year RFS and OS were observed among children whose parents were unemployed/not in workforce (RFS: HR [hazard ratio] = 1.14, 95% CI [confidence interval]: 0.90-1.45, OS: HR = 1.28, 95% CI: 0.95-1.71) or from non-Western countries (RFS: HR = 1.21 95% CI: 0.96-1.52, OS: HR = 1.44, 95% CI: 1.09-1.90). Results by diagnostic groups revealed particularly low OS for children with non-central nervous system tumors whose parents were from non-Western countries (HR = 1.92, 95% CI: 1.24-2.97). Targeted strategies are needed to promote social equity and ensure optimal diagnosis, care, and management of childhood cancer across social groups.</p>","PeriodicalId":7110,"journal":{"name":"Acta Oncologica","volume":"64 ","pages":"179-187"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2025-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11808813/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143063166","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-28DOI: 10.2340/1651-226X.2025.42418
Aleksandar M Kostov, Maj-Britt Jensen, Bent Ejlertsen, Mads Thomassen, Caroline Maria Rossing, Inge S Pedersen, Annabeth H Petersen, Lise Lotte Christensen, Karin A W Wadt, Anne-Vibeke Lænkholm
Background and purpose: Despite advancements in genetic testing and expanded eligibility criteria, underutilisation of germline testing for pathogenic variants in BRCA1 and BRCA2 (BRCA) remains evident among breast cancer (BC) patients. This observational cohort study presents real-world data on BRCA testing within the context of clinical practice challenges, including incomplete family history and under-referral.
Material and methods: From the Danish Breast Cancer Group (DBCG) clinical database, we included 65,117 females with unilateral stage I-III BC diagnosed in 2000-2017, of whom 9,125 (14%) were BRCA tested. Test results spanned from 1999 to 2021. We evaluated test rates overall and in three diagnosis periods. In logistic regression models, we examined the correlation between a BRCA test and patients' age, residency region, receptor status, and diagnosis period.
Results: Test rates rose most significantly among patients aged under 40 years, increasing from 47% (2000-2005) to 88% (2012-2017), albeit with regional discrepancies. Test timing shifted in recent years, with most results within 6 months of BC diagnosis, primarily among the youngest patients. BRCA test rates were higher for oestrogen receptor-negative/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative BC (25% in 2000-2005 vs. 38% in 2012-2017), and these findings were confirmed in multivariate regression models.
Interpretation: Our results indicate a critical need for an intensified focus on BRCA testing among BC patients older than 40, where a mainstreamed testing approach might overcome delayed or missed testing. Current DBCG guidelines recommend BRCA testing of all BC patients younger than 50 years, while a general recommendation for older patients is still missing.
{"title":"Germline BRCA testing in Denmark following invasive breast cancer: Progress since 2000.","authors":"Aleksandar M Kostov, Maj-Britt Jensen, Bent Ejlertsen, Mads Thomassen, Caroline Maria Rossing, Inge S Pedersen, Annabeth H Petersen, Lise Lotte Christensen, Karin A W Wadt, Anne-Vibeke Lænkholm","doi":"10.2340/1651-226X.2025.42418","DOIUrl":"10.2340/1651-226X.2025.42418","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong>Despite advancements in genetic testing and expanded eligibility criteria, underutilisation of germline testing for pathogenic variants in BRCA1 and BRCA2 (BRCA) remains evident among breast cancer (BC) patients. This observational cohort study presents real-world data on BRCA testing within the context of clinical practice challenges, including incomplete family history and under-referral.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>From the Danish Breast Cancer Group (DBCG) clinical database, we included 65,117 females with unilateral stage I-III BC diagnosed in 2000-2017, of whom 9,125 (14%) were BRCA tested. Test results spanned from 1999 to 2021. We evaluated test rates overall and in three diagnosis periods. In logistic regression models, we examined the correlation between a BRCA test and patients' age, residency region, receptor status, and diagnosis period.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Test rates rose most significantly among patients aged under 40 years, increasing from 47% (2000-2005) to 88% (2012-2017), albeit with regional discrepancies. Test timing shifted in recent years, with most results within 6 months of BC diagnosis, primarily among the youngest patients. BRCA test rates were higher for oestrogen receptor-negative/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative BC (25% in 2000-2005 vs. 38% in 2012-2017), and these findings were confirmed in multivariate regression models.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>Our results indicate a critical need for an intensified focus on BRCA testing among BC patients older than 40, where a mainstreamed testing approach might overcome delayed or missed testing. Current DBCG guidelines recommend BRCA testing of all BC patients younger than 50 years, while a general recommendation for older patients is still missing.</p>","PeriodicalId":7110,"journal":{"name":"Acta Oncologica","volume":"64 ","pages":"147-155"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2025-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11808818/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143057629","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-28DOI: 10.2340/1651-226X.2025.42218
Yvonne Brandberg, Olof Akre, Mia Bergenmar
Background and purpose: Informed consent from trial participants is mandatory. In a randomized clinical trial, we investigated (1) differences in knowledge and understanding of trial information between patients who participated and those who refrained, (2) differences in perceptions of information, and (3) differences in satisfaction with the information.
Patients: After the decision about participation in the randomized study, 'Surgery versus radiotherapy for locally advanced prostate cancer' (SPCG-15), patients were sent questionnaires ('Quality of Informed Consent', EORTC QLQ-INFO25). Patients were categorized in 'Non-participants' or 'Participants'.
Results and interpretation: A total of 80 patients (80%) responded, 68% of non-participants and 95% of participants. Between-group differences in knowledge were found for duration of the trial, insurances in the trial, and if the trial intervention had been proven to be superior. Patients had high levels of knowledge (> 80%) regarding the trial aim, that participation implied research, the right to decline, that future patients benefit from research and, of the randomization procedure. Less than 50% responded correctly concerning risks associated with the trial, the unproven nature of the trial and issues about insurances. Non-participants scored lower concerning duration of trial participation, confidentiality of medical records, treatments and procedures in the trial, and experimental nature of treatments. There were no differences regarding satisfaction with information. Non-participants and participants did not differ in satisfaction, or in knowledge and understanding of most aspects of the information. Knowledge levels were low in some areas, and thus, it seems to be room for improvement to fulfill the requirements of informed consent.
{"title":"Knowledge and understanding of information after taking decision to participate or not in a randomized trial of surgery vs radiotherapy among patients with locally advanced prostate cancer - an observational study.","authors":"Yvonne Brandberg, Olof Akre, Mia Bergenmar","doi":"10.2340/1651-226X.2025.42218","DOIUrl":"10.2340/1651-226X.2025.42218","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong>Informed consent from trial participants is mandatory. In a randomized clinical trial, we investigated (1) differences in knowledge and understanding of trial information between patients who participated and those who refrained, (2) differences in perceptions of information, and (3) differences in satisfaction with the information.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>After the decision about participation in the randomized study, 'Surgery versus radiotherapy for locally advanced prostate cancer' (SPCG-15), patients were sent questionnaires ('Quality of Informed Consent', EORTC QLQ-INFO25). Patients were categorized in 'Non-participants' or 'Participants'.</p><p><strong>Results and interpretation: </strong>A total of 80 patients (80%) responded, 68% of non-participants and 95% of participants. Between-group differences in knowledge were found for duration of the trial, insurances in the trial, and if the trial intervention had been proven to be superior. Patients had high levels of knowledge (> 80%) regarding the trial aim, that participation implied research, the right to decline, that future patients benefit from research and, of the randomization procedure. Less than 50% responded correctly concerning risks associated with the trial, the unproven nature of the trial and issues about insurances. Non-participants scored lower concerning duration of trial participation, confidentiality of medical records, treatments and procedures in the trial, and experimental nature of treatments. There were no differences regarding satisfaction with information. Non-participants and participants did not differ in satisfaction, or in knowledge and understanding of most aspects of the information. Knowledge levels were low in some areas, and thus, it seems to be room for improvement to fulfill the requirements of informed consent.</p>","PeriodicalId":7110,"journal":{"name":"Acta Oncologica","volume":"64 ","pages":"167-172"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2025-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11808810/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143057632","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-28DOI: 10.2340/1651-226X.2025.42128
Bogdana Patachi, Kristian H Jensen, Anita Gothelf, Mogens Bernsdorf, Jeppe Friborg, Claus A Kristensen
Background and purpose: The randomised clinical trial KEYNOTE-048 has demonstrated a significant increase in survival for patients with head and neck cancer treated with pembrolizumab with or without chemotherapy. The purpose of the present retrospective study was to investigate whether survival in a group of consecutive patients treated at our department was comparable to the results from KEYNOTE-048.
Patients/material and methods: Seventy-six patients initiated treatment with pembrolizumab ± platinum/5-FU between July 2020 and May 2022. Baseline characteristics were collected, response rates and survival times were calculated and compared to those published from KEYNOTE-048.
Results and interpretation: Fifty-one percent of patients had locoregional recurrence and 47% had distant metastases. Median progression-free survival was 5.5 months, and median overall survival (OS) was 12.3 months in the total cohort. OS was significantly higher for patients with combined positive score (CPS) ≥20 (14.6 months) than for patients with CPS 1-19 (7.3 months) (p = 0.04). There was no significant difference in survival times between patients ± 65 years of age or between patients with locoregional disease versus distant metastases. In conclusion, the results from KEYNOTE-048 were corroborated in a consecutive cohort of patients treated at Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
{"title":"Pembrolizumab as first-line treatment for recurrent and metastatic head and neck cancer - real-world single-centre data.","authors":"Bogdana Patachi, Kristian H Jensen, Anita Gothelf, Mogens Bernsdorf, Jeppe Friborg, Claus A Kristensen","doi":"10.2340/1651-226X.2025.42128","DOIUrl":"10.2340/1651-226X.2025.42128","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong>The randomised clinical trial KEYNOTE-048 has demonstrated a significant increase in survival for patients with head and neck cancer treated with pembrolizumab with or without chemotherapy. The purpose of the present retrospective study was to investigate whether survival in a group of consecutive patients treated at our department was comparable to the results from KEYNOTE-048.</p><p><strong>Patients/material and methods: </strong>Seventy-six patients initiated treatment with pembrolizumab ± platinum/5-FU between July 2020 and May 2022. Baseline characteristics were collected, response rates and survival times were calculated and compared to those published from KEYNOTE-048.</p><p><strong>Results and interpretation: </strong>Fifty-one percent of patients had locoregional recurrence and 47% had distant metastases. Median progression-free survival was 5.5 months, and median overall survival (OS) was 12.3 months in the total cohort. OS was significantly higher for patients with combined positive score (CPS) ≥20 (14.6 months) than for patients with CPS 1-19 (7.3 months) (p = 0.04). There was no significant difference in survival times between patients ± 65 years of age or between patients with locoregional disease versus distant metastases. In conclusion, the results from KEYNOTE-048 were corroborated in a consecutive cohort of patients treated at Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.</p>","PeriodicalId":7110,"journal":{"name":"Acta Oncologica","volume":"64 ","pages":"143-146"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2025-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11794996/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143057646","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}