首页 > 最新文献

BJA open最新文献

英文 中文
Environmental harm from anaesthesia: the importance of clinical realism and chemical persistence: a reply 麻醉对环境的危害:临床真实性和化学持久性的重要性:回复
Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2025-10-10 DOI: 10.1016/j.bjao.2025.100495
Sarah-Louise Watson , Tom E.F. Abbott
{"title":"Environmental harm from anaesthesia: the importance of clinical realism and chemical persistence: a reply","authors":"Sarah-Louise Watson , Tom E.F. Abbott","doi":"10.1016/j.bjao.2025.100495","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.bjao.2025.100495","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":72418,"journal":{"name":"BJA open","volume":"16 ","pages":"Article 100495"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145268330","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The association between preoperative anxiety and chronic post-surgical pain after general anaesthesia, a systematic review and meta-analysis 术前焦虑与全身麻醉后慢性术后疼痛的关系:系统回顾和荟萃分析
Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2025-10-06 DOI: 10.1016/j.bjao.2025.100487
Mirjam Bakker-Bons , Ria M.J. Hijmering , Remko Soer , André P. Wolff

Background

Chronic post-surgical pain (CPSP) is a burden for both patients and healthcare, yet current treatment options are insufficient. Previous studies indicate preoperative anxiety as a risk factor for developing CPSP, yet no high-quality review exists. This study aims to systematically review the relationship between increased preoperative anxiety and the incidence of new CPSP.

Methods

Four databases were used to identify relevant studies for a systematic review and meta-analysis. Inclusion criteria included adult patients undergoing surgical procedures under general anaesthesia, measuring preoperative anxiety with validated tools, and postoperative pain at least 3 months after surgery. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were followed, and a risk of bias analysis was performed.

Results

Of the 233 studies retrieved, 26 studies were included in the systematic review. Following risk of bias analysis, 23 papers were included in the meta-analysis. A correlation was found between preoperative anxiety and CPSP, with a standardised mean difference of 0.31 (95% confidence interval 0.20–0.41). High heterogeneity was observed, which was attributed to several possible confounding factors. Subgroup analysis did not alter this outcome. When translating the outcome to a relevant scale, we observed an increase in numeric rating scale pain of 0.34 for patients experiencing preoperative anxiety.

Conclusions

There is moderate-quality evidence indicating a positive association between preoperative anxiety and CPSP, where an increase in preoperative anxiety correlates with an increased incidence of CPSP. More research is needed to identify specific patients that would benefit from treating preoperative anxiety and thus potentially preventing CPSP.

Systematic review protocol

PROSPERO (CRD42024513479).
背景:慢性术后疼痛(CPSP)是患者和医疗保健的负担,但目前的治疗方案不足。先前的研究表明术前焦虑是发生CPSP的危险因素,但没有高质量的综述。本研究旨在系统回顾术前焦虑增加与新发CPSP发生率之间的关系。方法采用4个数据库对相关研究进行系统综述和荟萃分析。纳入标准包括在全身麻醉下接受外科手术的成年患者,用经过验证的工具测量术前焦虑,术后至少3个月疼痛。遵循系统评价和荟萃分析(PRISMA)指南的首选报告项目,并进行偏倚风险分析。结果在检索到的233项研究中,26项研究被纳入系统评价。风险偏倚分析后,23篇论文被纳入meta分析。术前焦虑与CPSP呈正相关,标准化平均差为0.31(95%可信区间0.20-0.41)。观察到高度异质性,这归因于几个可能的混杂因素。亚组分析没有改变这一结果。当将结果转换为相关量表时,我们观察到术前焦虑患者的数字评分量表疼痛增加了0.34。结论:有中等质量的证据表明术前焦虑与CPSP之间存在正相关,其中术前焦虑的增加与CPSP发生率的增加相关。需要更多的研究来确定具体的患者将受益于治疗术前焦虑,从而潜在地预防CPSP。系统评价方案prospero (CRD42024513479)。
{"title":"The association between preoperative anxiety and chronic post-surgical pain after general anaesthesia, a systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"Mirjam Bakker-Bons ,&nbsp;Ria M.J. Hijmering ,&nbsp;Remko Soer ,&nbsp;André P. Wolff","doi":"10.1016/j.bjao.2025.100487","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.bjao.2025.100487","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Chronic post-surgical pain (CPSP) is a burden for both patients and healthcare, yet current treatment options are insufficient. Previous studies indicate preoperative anxiety as a risk factor for developing CPSP, yet no high-quality review exists. This study aims to systematically review the relationship between increased preoperative anxiety and the incidence of new CPSP.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Four databases were used to identify relevant studies for a systematic review and meta-analysis. Inclusion criteria included adult patients undergoing surgical procedures under general anaesthesia, measuring preoperative anxiety with validated tools, and postoperative pain at least 3 months after surgery. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were followed, and a risk of bias analysis was performed.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of the 233 studies retrieved, 26 studies were included in the systematic review. Following risk of bias analysis, 23 papers were included in the meta-analysis. A correlation was found between preoperative anxiety and CPSP, with a standardised mean difference of 0.31 (95% confidence interval 0.20–0.41). High heterogeneity was observed, which was attributed to several possible confounding factors. Subgroup analysis did not alter this outcome. When translating the outcome to a relevant scale, we observed an increase in numeric rating scale pain of 0.34 for patients experiencing preoperative anxiety.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>There is moderate-quality evidence indicating a positive association between preoperative anxiety and CPSP, where an increase in preoperative anxiety correlates with an increased incidence of CPSP. More research is needed to identify specific patients that would benefit from treating preoperative anxiety and thus potentially preventing CPSP.</div></div><div><h3>Systematic review protocol</h3><div>PROSPERO (CRD42024513479).</div></div>","PeriodicalId":72418,"journal":{"name":"BJA open","volume":"16 ","pages":"Article 100487"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145268331","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The Adolescent Surgery Experience (ASE): a survey-based prospective cohort study to measure risk factors for persistent opioid use 青少年手术经验(ASE):一项基于调查的前瞻性队列研究,旨在测量持续使用阿片类药物的危险因素
Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2025-10-15 DOI: 10.1016/j.bjao.2025.100496
Tori N. Sutherland , Scott E. Hadland , Jiwon Moon , Joana Fardad , Elizabeth Ramsay , Michael J. Kallan , Mark D. Neuman

Background

Increasing data suggest adolescents have elevated risk of persistent postsurgical pain and opioid use, but their recovery experience remains poorly characterised.

Methods

This prospective cohort study enrolled opioid-naive adolescents without chronic pain between June 2022 and May 2023 before undergoing procedures with anticipated mild, moderate, or severe postoperative pain. Participants completed eight surveys during recovery. We measured characteristics associated with persistent opioid use, including non-surgical site pain, difficulty sleeping, depression (Patient Health Questionnaire-9 [PHQ-9]), and anxiety (General Anxiety Disorder [GAD-7]) over 5 months after surgery.

Results

Five hundred adolescents (median age: 15 yr (inter-quartile range 13–17 yr]) completed the baseline survey. Overall, 47.4% were female, 69.6% identified as White, 22.4% as Black/African American, and 10.8% as Hispanic/Latino. Overall, one in five (21.1%) reported depression, approximately two in five reported anxiety (37.4%), and one in six (16.6%) reported prior-year substance use. Among those undergoing procedures associated with severe pain, 93.4% received an outpatient opioid prescription (median 18 doses [inter-quartile range 12–25 doses]). At the end of the study, 16.7% (n=47) reported regular non-surgical site pain, 20.6% (n=58) had difficulty sleeping, and 15.7% and 15.3% had persistent depression and anxiety symptoms, respectively.

Conclusion

A high proportion of adolescents endorsed preoperative anxiety, depression, and substance use, which, in combination with prescription opioids, are known risk factors for postoperative opioid use disorder. Over time, postoperative non-surgical site pain, difficulty sleeping, depression, and anxiety declined but remained common. Additional research is needed to understand the relationship between pre- and postoperative risk factors and adverse outcomes during surgical recovery.

Clinical trial registration

NCT05482919.
背景越来越多的数据表明,青少年术后持续疼痛和阿片类药物使用的风险增加,但他们的康复经历仍然缺乏特征。方法:这项前瞻性队列研究招募了2022年6月至2023年5月期间未使用阿片类药物的青少年,他们没有慢性疼痛,然后接受了预期的轻度、中度或重度术后疼痛的手术。参与者在康复期间完成了8项调查。我们测量了持续使用阿片类药物的相关特征,包括术后5个月的非手术部位疼痛、睡眠困难、抑郁(患者健康问卷-9 [PHQ-9])和焦虑(一般焦虑障碍[GAD-7])。结果500名青少年(中位年龄:15岁(四分位数间13-17岁))完成了基线调查。总体而言,47.4%为女性,69.6%为白人,22.4%为黑人/非裔美国人,10.8%为西班牙裔/拉丁裔。总体而言,五分之一(21.1%)的人报告抑郁,大约五分之二(37.4%)的人报告焦虑,六分之一(16.6%)的人报告去年使用过药物。在接受与严重疼痛相关手术的患者中,93.4%的患者接受了门诊阿片类药物处方(中位数为18剂[四分位数间距为12-25剂])。在研究结束时,16.7% (n=47)报告常规非手术部位疼痛,20.6% (n=58)报告睡眠困难,15.7%和15.3%分别有持续的抑郁和焦虑症状。结论术前焦虑、抑郁和药物使用与处方阿片类药物共同是导致术后阿片类药物使用障碍的危险因素。随着时间的推移,术后非手术部位疼痛、睡眠困难、抑郁和焦虑有所下降,但仍很常见。需要进一步的研究来了解术前和术后危险因素与手术恢复期间不良后果之间的关系。临床试验注册号nct05482919。
{"title":"The Adolescent Surgery Experience (ASE): a survey-based prospective cohort study to measure risk factors for persistent opioid use","authors":"Tori N. Sutherland ,&nbsp;Scott E. Hadland ,&nbsp;Jiwon Moon ,&nbsp;Joana Fardad ,&nbsp;Elizabeth Ramsay ,&nbsp;Michael J. Kallan ,&nbsp;Mark D. Neuman","doi":"10.1016/j.bjao.2025.100496","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.bjao.2025.100496","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Increasing data suggest adolescents have elevated risk of persistent postsurgical pain and opioid use, but their recovery experience remains poorly characterised.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This prospective cohort study enrolled opioid-naive adolescents without chronic pain between June 2022 and May 2023 before undergoing procedures with anticipated mild, moderate, or severe postoperative pain. Participants completed eight surveys during recovery. We measured characteristics associated with persistent opioid use, including non-surgical site pain, difficulty sleeping, depression (Patient Health Questionnaire-9 [PHQ-9]), and anxiety (General Anxiety Disorder [GAD-7]) over 5 months after surgery.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Five hundred adolescents (median age: 15 yr (inter-quartile range 13–17 yr]) completed the baseline survey. Overall, 47.4% were female, 69.6% identified as White, 22.4% as Black/African American, and 10.8% as Hispanic/Latino. Overall, one in five (21.1%) reported depression, approximately two in five reported anxiety (37.4%), and one in six (16.6%) reported prior-year substance use. Among those undergoing procedures associated with severe pain, 93.4% received an outpatient opioid prescription (median 18 doses [inter-quartile range 12–25 doses]). At the end of the study, 16.7% (<em>n</em>=47) reported regular non-surgical site pain, 20.6% (<em>n</em>=58) had difficulty sleeping, and 15.7% and 15.3% had persistent depression and anxiety symptoms, respectively.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>A high proportion of adolescents endorsed preoperative anxiety, depression, and substance use, which, in combination with prescription opioids, are known risk factors for postoperative opioid use disorder. Over time, postoperative non-surgical site pain, difficulty sleeping, depression, and anxiety declined but remained common. Additional research is needed to understand the relationship between pre- and postoperative risk factors and adverse outcomes during surgical recovery.</div></div><div><h3>Clinical trial registration</h3><div>NCT05482919.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":72418,"journal":{"name":"BJA open","volume":"16 ","pages":"Article 100496"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145321230","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Determining reduced functional capacity in older adults using research-grade wearable accelerometers: a secondary analysis of the study of muscle, mobility, and aging 使用研究级可穿戴加速度计确定老年人功能能力下降:肌肉、活动能力和衰老研究的二次分析
Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2025-11-24 DOI: 10.1016/j.bjao.2025.100510
Anthony Hung , Nancy W. Glynn , Reagan E. Garcia , Megan Hetherington-Rauth , Peggy M. Cawthon , Daniel E. Forman , Eileen Johnson , Daniel S. Rubin

Background

Reduced functional capacity (FC) is associated with adverse surgical outcomes in older adults. Current FC assessments rely on questionnaires; however, it remains unclear whether accelerometer-measured daily activity provides a more accurate evaluation. Our primary aim was to identify accelerometer-based variables associated with reduced FC.

Methods

We conducted a secondary analysis of the Study of Muscle, Mobility and Aging (SOMMA) cohort. Participants were community-dwelling adults (non-surgical) aged ≥70 yr and recruited between the years 2019 to 2021 at the University of Pittsburgh (Pittsburgh, PA, USA) and Wake Forest University School of Medicine (Winston-Salem, NC, USA). Participants were included if they completed cardiopulmonary exercise testing and had valid wear time (≥3 days) for two accelerometers used in the SOMMA study (ActiGraph GT9X and activPAL4). We applied classification and regression tree and random forest models to accelerometry-derived metrics. For comparison, we constructed a logistic regression model using modified Duke Activity Status Index 4-Question (M-DASI-4Q) scores extrapolated from the Community Healthy Activities Model Program for Seniors questionnaire.

Results

The final cohort included 640 participants (57.2% [366/640] women; mean age 76.3 [5.0] yr), of whom 18% (114/640) had reduced FC (peak oxygen uptake [VO2peak] <16 ml kg−1 min−1). Participants with adequate FC had higher daily step counts (5843.9 [2950.4] vs 2988.3 [1757.2] steps per day; P<0.001) and more time in moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (118.0 [62.2] vs 59.9 [42.4] min day−1; P<0.001) compared with those with reduced FC. The accelerometer-based random forest model (AUC 0.79) did not significantly outperform the M-DASI-4Q model (AUC 0.72; P=0.16).

Conclusion

Among community-dwelling older adults, daily step count and time in moderate-to-vigorous activity were most associated with FC, but the accelerometer-based model showed only fair discrimination to identify participants with reduced FC. Validation in surgical populations is needed.
背景:功能能力下降(FC)与老年人不良手术结果相关。目前的FC评估依赖于问卷;然而,目前尚不清楚加速度计测量的日常活动是否能提供更准确的评估。我们的主要目的是确定与减少FC相关的加速度计变量。方法对肌肉运动与衰老研究(SOMMA)队列进行二次分析。参与者是年龄≥70岁的社区居住成年人(非手术),于2019年至2021年在匹兹堡大学(美国宾夕法尼亚州匹兹堡)和维克森林大学医学院(美国北卡罗来纳州温斯顿-塞勒姆)招募。如果参与者完成了心肺运动测试,并且在SOMMA研究中使用的两种加速度计(ActiGraph GT9X和activPAL4)有有效磨损时间(≥3天),则纳入受试者。我们将分类、回归树和随机森林模型应用于加速度测量衍生的度量。为了进行比较,我们使用从老年人社区健康活动模型计划问卷中推断出的修正杜克活动状态指数4-问题(M-DASI-4Q)得分构建了一个逻辑回归模型。结果最终队列包括640名参与者(57.2%[366/640]名女性,平均年龄76.3[5.0]岁),其中18%(114/640)的FC降低(峰值摄氧量[vo2峰值]& 16 ml kg - 1 min - 1)。与FC减少的参与者相比,FC充足的参与者有更高的每日步数(5843.9 [2950.4]vs 2988.3[1757.2]步/天;P<0.001)和更多的中高强度体力活动时间(118.0 [62.2]vs 59.9[42.4]分钟/天;P<0.001)。基于加速度计的随机森林模型(AUC 0.79)没有显著优于M-DASI-4Q模型(AUC 0.72; P=0.16)。结论:在社区居住的老年人中,每日步数和中高强度活动时间与FC最相关,但基于加速度计的模型对识别FC减少的参与者仅显示公平歧视。需要在手术人群中进行验证。
{"title":"Determining reduced functional capacity in older adults using research-grade wearable accelerometers: a secondary analysis of the study of muscle, mobility, and aging","authors":"Anthony Hung ,&nbsp;Nancy W. Glynn ,&nbsp;Reagan E. Garcia ,&nbsp;Megan Hetherington-Rauth ,&nbsp;Peggy M. Cawthon ,&nbsp;Daniel E. Forman ,&nbsp;Eileen Johnson ,&nbsp;Daniel S. Rubin","doi":"10.1016/j.bjao.2025.100510","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.bjao.2025.100510","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Reduced functional capacity (FC) is associated with adverse surgical outcomes in older adults. Current FC assessments rely on questionnaires; however, it remains unclear whether accelerometer-measured daily activity provides a more accurate evaluation. Our primary aim was to identify accelerometer-based variables associated with reduced FC.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We conducted a secondary analysis of the Study of Muscle, Mobility and Aging (SOMMA) cohort. Participants were community-dwelling adults (non-surgical) aged ≥70 yr and recruited between the years 2019 to 2021 at the University of Pittsburgh (Pittsburgh, PA, USA) and Wake Forest University School of Medicine (Winston-Salem, NC, USA). Participants were included if they completed cardiopulmonary exercise testing and had valid wear time (≥3 days) for two accelerometers used in the SOMMA study (ActiGraph GT9X and activPAL4). We applied classification and regression tree and random forest models to accelerometry-derived metrics. For comparison, we constructed a logistic regression model using modified Duke Activity Status Index 4-Question (M-DASI-4Q) scores extrapolated from the Community Healthy Activities Model Program for Seniors questionnaire.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The final cohort included 640 participants (57.2% [366/640] women; mean age 76.3 [5.0] yr), of whom 18% (114/640) had reduced FC (peak oxygen uptake [VO<sub>2</sub>peak] &lt;16 ml kg<sup>−1</sup> min<sup>−1</sup>). Participants with adequate FC had higher daily step counts (5843.9 [2950.4] <em>vs</em> 2988.3 [1757.2] steps per day; <em>P</em>&lt;0.001) and more time in moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (118.0 [62.2] <em>vs</em> 59.9 [42.4] min day<sup>−1</sup>; <em>P</em>&lt;0.001) compared with those with reduced FC. The accelerometer-based random forest model (AUC 0.79) did not significantly outperform the M-DASI-4Q model (AUC 0.72; <em>P</em>=0.16).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Among community-dwelling older adults, daily step count and time in moderate-to-vigorous activity were most associated with FC, but the accelerometer-based model showed only fair discrimination to identify participants with reduced FC. Validation in surgical populations is needed.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":72418,"journal":{"name":"BJA open","volume":"16 ","pages":"Article 100510"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145624009","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Kidney disease and cardiac surgery: marker, mediator, or both? 肾脏疾病和心脏手术:标志、中介,还是两者都有?
Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2025-12-04 DOI: 10.1016/j.bjao.2025.100507
Abraham H. Hulst , Fabrizio Monaco
Cardiac surgery places an enormous burden on the kidneys, and therefore, acute kidney injury (AKI) is a common postoperative complication. Pre-existing chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a strong predictor of cardiac surgery-associated AKI, in addition to the evidence of a bidirectional interaction where AKI also accelerates the progression of CKD and increases the risk of renal failure. While observational research links kidney dysfunction to prolonged hospital stays, morbidity, and mortality, the question remains whether AKI is a modifiable mediator or merely a perioperative risk predictor. Larger analyses, including that of Bille and colleagues, indicate that AKI drives the acceleration of CKD. These findings provide further evidence for systematic follow-up and early implementation of kidney-protective measures to optimise long-term renal function after cardiac surgery.
心脏手术给肾脏带来了巨大的负担,因此,急性肾损伤(AKI)是常见的术后并发症。已有慢性肾脏疾病(CKD)是心脏手术相关AKI的一个强有力的预测因素,此外还有双向相互作用的证据,其中AKI也加速CKD的进展并增加肾衰竭的风险。虽然观察性研究将肾功能障碍与延长住院时间、发病率和死亡率联系起来,但AKI是一种可改变的调节因子还是仅仅是围手术期风险预测因子,这个问题仍然存在。包括Bille及其同事在内的大型分析表明,AKI会加速CKD的发展。这些发现为系统随访和早期实施肾脏保护措施以优化心脏手术后的长期肾功能提供了进一步的证据。
{"title":"Kidney disease and cardiac surgery: marker, mediator, or both?","authors":"Abraham H. Hulst ,&nbsp;Fabrizio Monaco","doi":"10.1016/j.bjao.2025.100507","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.bjao.2025.100507","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Cardiac surgery places an enormous burden on the kidneys, and therefore, acute kidney injury (AKI) is a common postoperative complication. Pre-existing chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a strong predictor of cardiac surgery-associated AKI, in addition to the evidence of a bidirectional interaction where AKI also accelerates the progression of CKD and increases the risk of renal failure. While observational research links kidney dysfunction to prolonged hospital stays, morbidity, and mortality, the question remains whether AKI is a modifiable mediator or merely a perioperative risk predictor. Larger analyses, including that of Bille and colleagues, indicate that AKI drives the acceleration of CKD. These findings provide further evidence for systematic follow-up and early implementation of kidney-protective measures to optimise long-term renal function after cardiac surgery.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":72418,"journal":{"name":"BJA open","volume":"16 ","pages":"Article 100507"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145746877","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
North American and European practices for opioid-sparing and opioid-free anaesthesia: a cross-sectional survey 北美和欧洲保留阿片类药物和无阿片类药物麻醉的做法:横断面调查
Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2025-12-15 DOI: 10.1016/j.bjao.2025.100511
Yann Gricourt , Nancy M. Boulos , Yann Daoulas , Tristan Grogan , Brenton Alexander , Myriam Mezzarobba , Philippe Cuvillon , Esther M. Pogatzki-Zahn , Helene Beloeil , Maxime Cannesson , Patrice Forget , Alexandre Joosten

Background

Opioids remain central to perioperative analgesia but concerns about the growing opioid crisis and adverse effects have prompted revaluation of their role. Opioid-sparing anaesthesia and opioid-free anaesthesia (OFA) have emerged as alternatives, yet their clinical adoption remains uncertain. This survey assessed adoption and perceptions among anaesthesiologists in North America and Europe.

Methods

A 26-question cross-sectional, web-based survey was distributed via email to members of the American, European, and French Societies of anaesthesiologists. The survey assessed routine use of opioid-sparing techniques, defined as the regular use of non-opioid analgesics and adjuncts to minimise intraoperative opioid use in the past month. We hypothesised that fewer than 50% of anaesthesiologists routinely used these techniques during this period.

Results

The overall response rate was 2% among ASA members (614/31 000) and 12% among European Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care (ESAIC) members (414/3500). Concern about opioid use was reported as high in ESAIC and ASA members (90% vs 83%, P<0.001). Daily use of opioid sparing techniques was reported by 37% (95% confidence interval [CI] 32–42%) of ESAIC and 40% (95% CI 36–45%) of ASA members. OFA use was less common overall but reported to be higher by ASA repondents (21%, 95% CI 18–25%) vs 12% (95% CI 9–15%), P<0.001) for EASIC respondents. Perceived risks differed: EASIC respondents more often cited haemodynamic instability (43% vs 16%, P<0.001), whereas ASA respondents more often cited patient dissatisfaction (55% vs 30%) and uncontrolled pain (72% vs 53%, both P<0.001). Key barriers to OFA adoption included limited training, low confidence, and lack of evidence-based guidelines.

Conclusions

Interest in opioid-sparing anaesthesia and OFA is widespread, but routine use remains modest and varies by region. Regional perceptions, institutional protocols, and confidence in evidence appear to influence implementation.
阿片类药物仍然是围手术期镇痛的核心,但对日益增长的阿片类药物危机和不良反应的担忧促使人们重新评估其作用。阿片类药物保留麻醉和无阿片类药物麻醉(OFA)已作为替代方案出现,但其临床应用仍不确定。这项调查评估了北美和欧洲麻醉师对麻醉的采用和看法。方法通过电子邮件向美国、欧洲和法国麻醉医师协会的会员发送一份包含26个问题的网络横断面调查。该调查评估了阿片类药物节约技术的常规使用情况,定义为在过去一个月内定期使用非阿片类镇痛药和辅助药物以尽量减少术中阿片类药物的使用。我们假设在此期间,少于50%的麻醉师常规使用这些技术。结果ASA会员的总有效率为2% (614/ 31000),ESAIC会员的总有效率为12%(414/3500)。据报道,ESAIC和ASA成员对阿片类药物使用的担忧程度很高(90%对83%,P<0.001)。37%(95%可信区间[CI] 32-42%)的ESAIC成员和40% (95% CI 36-45%)的ASA成员报告每天使用阿片类药物节约技术。OFA的使用总体上不太常见,但据报道ASA受访者(21%,95% CI 18-25%)比EASIC受访者(12%,95% CI 9-15%)更高。感知到的风险不同:EASIC受访者更常提到血流动力学不稳定(43%对16%,P<0.001),而ASA受访者更常提到患者不满(55%对30%)和无法控制的疼痛(72%对53%,P<0.001)。OFA采用的主要障碍包括培训有限、信心不足和缺乏循证指南。结论:对阿片类药物保留麻醉和OFA的兴趣广泛,但常规使用仍然适度且因地区而异。区域观念、机构协议和对证据的信心似乎影响到执行。
{"title":"North American and European practices for opioid-sparing and opioid-free anaesthesia: a cross-sectional survey","authors":"Yann Gricourt ,&nbsp;Nancy M. Boulos ,&nbsp;Yann Daoulas ,&nbsp;Tristan Grogan ,&nbsp;Brenton Alexander ,&nbsp;Myriam Mezzarobba ,&nbsp;Philippe Cuvillon ,&nbsp;Esther M. Pogatzki-Zahn ,&nbsp;Helene Beloeil ,&nbsp;Maxime Cannesson ,&nbsp;Patrice Forget ,&nbsp;Alexandre Joosten","doi":"10.1016/j.bjao.2025.100511","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.bjao.2025.100511","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Opioids remain central to perioperative analgesia but concerns about the growing opioid crisis and adverse effects have prompted revaluation of their role. Opioid-sparing anaesthesia and opioid-free anaesthesia (OFA) have emerged as alternatives, yet their clinical adoption remains uncertain. This survey assessed adoption and perceptions among anaesthesiologists in North America and Europe.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A 26-question cross-sectional, web-based survey was distributed via email to members of the American, European, and French Societies of anaesthesiologists. The survey assessed routine use of opioid-sparing techniques, defined as the regular use of non-opioid analgesics and adjuncts to minimise intraoperative opioid use in the past month. We hypothesised that fewer than 50% of anaesthesiologists routinely used these techniques during this period.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The overall response rate was 2% among ASA members (614/31 000) and 12% among European Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care (ESAIC) members (414/3500). Concern about opioid use was reported as high in ESAIC and ASA members (90% <em>vs</em> 83%, <em>P</em>&lt;0.001). Daily use of opioid sparing techniques was reported by 37% (95% confidence interval [CI] 32–42%) of ESAIC and 40% (95% CI 36–45%) of ASA members. OFA use was less common overall but reported to be higher by ASA repondents (21%, 95% CI 18–25%) <em>vs</em> 12% (95% CI 9–15%), <em>P</em>&lt;0.001) for EASIC respondents. Perceived risks differed: EASIC respondents more often cited haemodynamic instability (43% <em>vs</em> 16%, <em>P</em>&lt;0.001), whereas ASA respondents more often cited patient dissatisfaction (55% <em>vs</em> 30%) and uncontrolled pain (72% <em>vs</em> 53%, both <em>P</em>&lt;0.001). Key barriers to OFA adoption included limited training, low confidence, and lack of evidence-based guidelines.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Interest in opioid-sparing anaesthesia and OFA is widespread, but routine use remains modest and varies by region. Regional perceptions, institutional protocols, and confidence in evidence appear to influence implementation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":72418,"journal":{"name":"BJA open","volume":"16 ","pages":"Article 100511"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145797164","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Trends in Paediatric surgical volume and associated mortality in England: a nationwide study over an eight year period 英国儿科外科手术数量和相关死亡率的趋势:一项为期八年的全国性研究
Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2025-11-25 DOI: 10.1016/j.bjao.2025.100505
Juri Althonayan , Alexander J. Fowler , Benjamin Allin , Amaki Sogbodjor , Timothy Bradnock , Nara Orban , Thomas D. Dobbs , Marian Knight , Rupert M. Pearse , Tom E.F. Abbott

Background

Reports on delays to National Health Service (NHS) surgical care have been widespread during and after the pandemic, however the impact on paediatric surgery is poorly described.

Methods

This retrospective observational cohort study used NHS hospital data in England for children aged <18 yr undergoing surgery over an 8-yr period from 1 April 2015 to 31 December 2020, with supplementary data until March 2023. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality within 90 days after surgery. The secondary outcome was hospital stay. We report trends in annual surgical procedure volume and mortality. Frequencies presented as n (%).

Results

We identified 36 605 870 surgical procedures, between 1 April 2015 and 31 December 2020, of which 1 846 965 (5.0%) were for children. A total of 759 083/1 846 965 (41.1%) patients were female and 313 981 (17.0%) were from minority ethnic groups. There were 41 018/1 846 965 (2.2%) procedures among neonates, 93 872 (5.1%) for children aged 28 days to 1 yr, 532 828 (28.8%) for years 1–5, 502 971 (27.2%) for years 5–12, 361 176 (19.6%) for years 12–15, and 315 100 (17.1%) for years 15–17. Median hospital stay was 1 (0–1) day. There were 6 573/1 846 965 (0.36%) in-hospital deaths within 90 days after surgery, and a trend for increasing mortality risk between 2015 and 2020 (P<0.05). The average annual number of procedures before the pandemic (2015–19) was 340 596, decreasing to 266 049 in 2023 (22% reduction in volume).

Conclusions

We report the trends in paediatric surgical volume and assocaited mortality for an entire healthcare system over eight years inlcuding during the COVID-19 pandemic. One in 14 surgical procedures were performed on children, with substantially lower mortality risk than adults.
背景:在大流行期间和之后,关于国民保健服务(NHS)外科护理延误的报告已经广泛存在,但对儿科手术的影响却描述得很少。方法:本回顾性观察队列研究使用英国NHS医院数据,包括2015年4月1日至2020年12月31日8年期间接受手术的18岁儿童,并补充数据至2023年3月。主要终点是术后90天内的住院死亡率。次要结果是住院时间。我们报告每年外科手术量和死亡率的趋势。频率以n(%)表示。结果2015年4月1日至2020年12月31日期间共发现36 605 870例手术,其中1 846 965例(5.0%)为儿童手术。女性患者759 083/1 846 965例(41.1%),少数民族患者313 981例(17.0%)。新生儿41 018例/1 846 965例(2.2%),28天至1岁儿童93 872例(5.1%),1 - 5岁532 828例(28.8%),5-12岁502 971例(27.2%),12-15岁361 176例(19.6%),15-17岁315 100例(17.1%)。住院时间中位数为1(0-1)天。术后90天内住院死亡病例为6 573/1 846 965例(0.36%),2015 - 2020年死亡风险呈上升趋势(P<0.05)。大流行前(2015-19年)的年平均手术次数为340596次,到2023年减少到266049次(减少22%)。我们报告了包括COVID-19大流行期间在内的整个医疗保健系统八年来儿科手术量和相关死亡率的趋势。每14例手术中就有一例是儿童手术,其死亡率大大低于成人。
{"title":"Trends in Paediatric surgical volume and associated mortality in England: a nationwide study over an eight year period","authors":"Juri Althonayan ,&nbsp;Alexander J. Fowler ,&nbsp;Benjamin Allin ,&nbsp;Amaki Sogbodjor ,&nbsp;Timothy Bradnock ,&nbsp;Nara Orban ,&nbsp;Thomas D. Dobbs ,&nbsp;Marian Knight ,&nbsp;Rupert M. Pearse ,&nbsp;Tom E.F. Abbott","doi":"10.1016/j.bjao.2025.100505","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.bjao.2025.100505","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Reports on delays to National Health Service (NHS) surgical care have been widespread during and after the pandemic, however the impact on paediatric surgery is poorly described.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This retrospective observational cohort study used NHS hospital data in England for children aged &lt;18 yr undergoing surgery over an 8-yr period from 1 April 2015 to 31 December 2020, with supplementary data until March 2023. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality within 90 days after surgery. The secondary outcome was hospital stay. We report trends in annual surgical procedure volume and mortality. Frequencies presented as <em>n</em> (%).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>We identified 36 605 870 surgical procedures, between 1 April 2015 and 31 December 2020, of which 1 846 965 (5.0%) were for children. A total of 759 083/1 846 965 (41.1%) patients were female and 313 981 (17.0%) were from minority ethnic groups. There were 41 018/1 846 965 (2.2%) procedures among neonates, 93 872 (5.1%) for children aged 28 days to 1 yr, 532 828 (28.8%) for years 1–5, 502 971 (27.2%) for years 5–12, 361 176 (19.6%) for years 12–15, and 315 100 (17.1%) for years 15–17. Median hospital stay was 1 (0–1) day. There were 6 573/1 846 965 (0.36%) in-hospital deaths within 90 days after surgery, and a trend for increasing mortality risk between 2015 and 2020 (<em>P</em>&lt;0.05). The average annual number of procedures before the pandemic (2015–19) was 340 596, decreasing to 266 049 in 2023 (22% reduction in volume).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>We report the trends in paediatric surgical volume and assocaited mortality for an entire healthcare system over eight years inlcuding during the COVID-19 pandemic. One in 14 surgical procedures were performed on children, with substantially lower mortality risk than adults.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":72418,"journal":{"name":"BJA open","volume":"16 ","pages":"Article 100505"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145624010","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Erector Spinae Plane block with fascial plane catheter for the Early Analgesia of Rib fractures in trauma (ESPEAR): a multicentre feasibility randomised trial 直立脊柱平面阻滞联合筋膜平面导管用于创伤性肋骨骨折早期镇痛(ESPEAR):一项多中心可行性随机试验
Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2025-10-13 DOI: 10.1016/j.bjao.2025.100498
David W. Hewson , Jessica Nightingale , Reuben Ogollah , Adam Brooks , Lauren Blackburn , Benjamin J. Ollivere , Matthew L. Costa , Tim Egan , Peter Bates , Ian Tyrrell-Marsh , Nigel M. Bedforth

Background

Traumatic rib fractures cause significant acute pain. Patients are at risk of hypoventilation, atelectasis, hypoxia, retained secretions, pneumonia, respiratory failure, and death. Effective analgesia is thought to reduce these adverse outcomes. There is widespread variation in analgesic treatments given to patients including oral, intravenous, and epidural routes of administration. Erector spinae plane (ESP) block, a novel regional analgesic technique, may be effective, but high-quality evidence is lacking.

Methods

To determine if a definitive trial of ESP block and catheter in rib fractures is possible, we conducted a multicentre, randomised, controlled pilot study with feasibility assessment. Adults with rib fractures were randomised in a 1:1 ratio to either (i) ESP blockade and catheter, or (ii) placebo ESP blockade and catheter, both for 72 h. In addition, all participants received multimodal analgesia. Participants and outcome assessors were blinded. The primary feasibility outcomes were recruitment rate (target: ≥1.11 participants/site/month), retention rate (target: ≥80%), and trial acceptability assessed by staff interview. Pre-specified red–amber–green criteria were agreed to determine feasibility of a future definitive clinical trial on this topic.

Results

Twenty-five participants (mean [standard deviation] age 57 [16] yr, number of rib fractures 5 [3]) were recruited from three UK major trauma centres at a rate of 0.69 participants per site per month. Retention to 6-week follow-up was 80%. Based on our criteria, the current study design is not feasible for adoption into a definitive trial. For future research in this area, we recommend substantial modification to (i) the intervention, (ii) means of bias reduction, and (iii) timing and nature of outcome measure assessments.

Conclusions

Based on pre-specified criteria, a definitive examination of the clinical effectiveness of ESP block in the analgesic management of adults after blunt force chest wall injury is only feasible if substantial amendments to trial processes piloted in this study are undertaken. An open-label assessment of single-shot ESP block, applying patient-reported average pain intensity of the first 24 h as the primary outcome, and conducted at sites with established ESP analgesic pathways, may overcome the most significant feasibility barriers identified by the present study.

Clinical trial registration

ISRCTN49307616.
背景:外伤性肋骨骨折引起明显的急性疼痛。患者存在通气不足、肺不张、缺氧、分泌物潴留、肺炎、呼吸衰竭和死亡的风险。有效的镇痛被认为可以减少这些不良后果。给患者的镇痛治疗有广泛的变化,包括口服、静脉注射和硬膜外给药途径。竖脊平面阻滞是一种新的局部镇痛技术,可能有效,但缺乏高质量的证据。方法:为了确定ESP阻滞和导管治疗肋骨骨折的最终试验是否可行,我们进行了一项多中心、随机、对照的试点研究,并进行了可行性评估。成年肋骨骨折患者按1:1的比例随机分配到(i) ESP阻断和导管,或(ii)安慰剂ESP阻断和导管,均为72小时。此外,所有参与者均接受多模式镇痛。参与者和结果评估者采用盲法。主要可行性指标为招募率(目标:≥1.11名参与者/站点/月)、保留率(目标:≥80%)和通过员工访谈评估的试验可接受性。预先指定的红-琥珀-绿标准已达成一致,以确定未来关于该主题的明确临床试验的可行性。结果从英国三家主要创伤中心招募25名参与者(平均[标准差]年龄57岁,肋骨骨折数5岁),每个地点每月0.69名参与者。随访6周后的保留率为80%。根据我们的标准,目前的研究设计不适合用于最终试验。对于该领域的未来研究,我们建议对以下方面进行实质性修改:(1)干预措施,(2)减少偏倚的方法,以及(3)结果测量评估的时间和性质。结论:基于预先规定的标准,只有对本研究中试点的试验过程进行实质性修改,才能对成人钝力胸壁损伤后ESP阻滞镇痛管理的临床有效性进行明确的检查。采用患者报告的前24小时的平均疼痛强度作为主要结果,并在具有确定的ESP镇痛通路的部位进行,对单次ESP阻滞的开放标签评估可能会克服本研究确定的最重要的可行性障碍。临床试验注册号:isrctn49307616。
{"title":"Erector Spinae Plane block with fascial plane catheter for the Early Analgesia of Rib fractures in trauma (ESPEAR): a multicentre feasibility randomised trial","authors":"David W. Hewson ,&nbsp;Jessica Nightingale ,&nbsp;Reuben Ogollah ,&nbsp;Adam Brooks ,&nbsp;Lauren Blackburn ,&nbsp;Benjamin J. Ollivere ,&nbsp;Matthew L. Costa ,&nbsp;Tim Egan ,&nbsp;Peter Bates ,&nbsp;Ian Tyrrell-Marsh ,&nbsp;Nigel M. Bedforth","doi":"10.1016/j.bjao.2025.100498","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.bjao.2025.100498","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Traumatic rib fractures cause significant acute pain. Patients are at risk of hypoventilation, atelectasis, hypoxia, retained secretions, pneumonia, respiratory failure, and death. Effective analgesia is thought to reduce these adverse outcomes. There is widespread variation in analgesic treatments given to patients including oral, intravenous, and epidural routes of administration. Erector spinae plane (ESP) block, a novel regional analgesic technique, may be effective, but high-quality evidence is lacking.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>To determine if a definitive trial of ESP block and catheter in rib fractures is possible, we conducted a multicentre, randomised, controlled pilot study with feasibility assessment. Adults with rib fractures were randomised in a 1:1 ratio to either (i) ESP blockade and catheter, or (ii) placebo ESP blockade and catheter, both for 72 h. In addition, all participants received multimodal analgesia. Participants and outcome assessors were blinded. The primary feasibility outcomes were recruitment rate (target: ≥1.11 participants/site/month), retention rate (target: ≥80%), and trial acceptability assessed by staff interview. Pre-specified red–amber–green criteria were agreed to determine feasibility of a future definitive clinical trial on this topic.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Twenty-five participants (mean [standard deviation] age 57 [16] yr, number of rib fractures 5 [3]) were recruited from three UK major trauma centres at a rate of 0.69 participants per site per month. Retention to 6-week follow-up was 80%. Based on our criteria, the current study design is not feasible for adoption into a definitive trial. For future research in this area, we recommend substantial modification to (i) the intervention, (ii) means of bias reduction, and (iii) timing and nature of outcome measure assessments.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Based on pre-specified criteria, a definitive examination of the clinical effectiveness of ESP block in the analgesic management of adults after blunt force chest wall injury is only feasible if substantial amendments to trial processes piloted in this study are undertaken. An open-label assessment of single-shot ESP block, applying patient-reported average pain intensity of the first 24 h as the primary outcome, and conducted at sites with established ESP analgesic pathways, may overcome the most significant feasibility barriers identified by the present study.</div></div><div><h3>Clinical trial registration</h3><div>ISRCTN49307616.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":72418,"journal":{"name":"BJA open","volume":"16 ","pages":"Article 100498"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145321229","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Characterisation and evaluation of early mobilisation interventions after emergency laparotomy surgery: a scoping review 急诊剖腹手术后早期动员干预的特征和评价:范围回顾
Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2025-10-28 DOI: 10.1016/j.bjao.2025.100501
Leonie Murphy , Todd Leckie , Stefanie Harding , Ana-Carolina Gonçalves , Luke Hodgson
Emergency laparotomy is a high-risk surgery, and postoperative functional decline contributes to the 1-yr mortality of 25%. However, there is no established guidance around postoperative interventions to restore functional capacity, including early mobilisation. This scoping review synthesised current evidence on the definition of early mobilisation, delivery of interventions, barriers, and outcomes reported for postoperative mobilisation interventions.
The review followed a structured methodological framework and was registered with Open Science Framework. Studies were identified through MEDLINE, Embase, and CINAHL. Eligible studies described an early mobilisation protocol (in isolation or as a bundled intervention) after emergency laparotomy. Data were extracted and analysed descriptively.
Fourteen studies (2783 participants) were included, with all but one published since 2018. Mobilisation out of bed within 24 h of surgery was the most frequently used definition of early mobilisation. Adherence rates ranged from 31% to 96%. Interventions were heterogeneous, ranging from encouragement to achieve mobilisation targets through to comprehensive multidisciplinary programmes. Intervention groups tended to achieve earlier and greater mobilisation. Key modifiable barriers were pain, fatigue, and limited physiotherapy staffing. All studies reported physical performance outcomes; only one reported quality of life outcomes.
This scoping review found heterogeneity in the delivery, dose, timing, and adherence to mobility interventions. Barriers to mobilisation after emergency laparotomy mirror those described after elective surgery. We suggest alignment in reporting the impact of individual factors (such as frailty and socioeconomic context) and core outcomes (including patient-centred measures) to standardise early postoperative mobilisation interventions and allow for synthesis of the evidence base.

Scoping review protocol

Open Science Framework (https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/R63CP).
急诊剖腹手术是一项高风险手术,术后功能下降导致1年死亡率为25%。然而,没有关于术后干预恢复功能能力的既定指导,包括早期活动。这项范围审查综合了关于早期动员的定义、干预措施的实施、障碍和术后动员干预措施报告的结果的现有证据。该综述遵循结构化的方法框架,并在开放科学框架中注册。研究通过MEDLINE、Embase和CINAHL进行鉴定。符合条件的研究描述了紧急剖腹手术后的早期活动方案(单独或捆绑干预)。提取数据并进行描述性分析。纳入了14项研究(2783名参与者),除一项研究外,其他研究均于2018年以来发表。手术后24小时内下床活动是早期活动最常用的定义。依从率从31%到96%不等。干预措施是多种多样的,从鼓励实现动员目标到全面的多学科方案。干预小组往往更早和更大程度地动员起来。主要可改变的障碍是疼痛、疲劳和有限的物理治疗人员。所有研究都报告了体能表现结果;只有一个报告了生活质量的结果。这一范围审查发现在输送、剂量、时间和对流动性干预的依从性方面存在异质性。紧急剖腹手术后活动障碍与择期手术后描述的障碍相同。我们建议在报告个体因素(如虚弱和社会经济背景)和核心结果(包括以患者为中心的措施)的影响时保持一致,以标准化术后早期动员干预措施,并允许综合证据基础。范围审查协议开放科学框架(https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/R63CP)。
{"title":"Characterisation and evaluation of early mobilisation interventions after emergency laparotomy surgery: a scoping review","authors":"Leonie Murphy ,&nbsp;Todd Leckie ,&nbsp;Stefanie Harding ,&nbsp;Ana-Carolina Gonçalves ,&nbsp;Luke Hodgson","doi":"10.1016/j.bjao.2025.100501","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.bjao.2025.100501","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Emergency laparotomy is a high-risk surgery, and postoperative functional decline contributes to the 1-yr mortality of 25%. However, there is no established guidance around postoperative interventions to restore functional capacity, including early mobilisation. This scoping review synthesised current evidence on the definition of early mobilisation, delivery of interventions, barriers, and outcomes reported for postoperative mobilisation interventions.</div><div>The review followed a structured methodological framework and was registered with Open Science Framework. Studies were identified through MEDLINE, Embase, and CINAHL. Eligible studies described an early mobilisation protocol (in isolation or as a bundled intervention) after emergency laparotomy. Data were extracted and analysed descriptively.</div><div>Fourteen studies (2783 participants) were included, with all but one published since 2018. Mobilisation out of bed within 24 h of surgery was the most frequently used definition of early mobilisation. Adherence rates ranged from 31% to 96%. Interventions were heterogeneous, ranging from encouragement to achieve mobilisation targets through to comprehensive multidisciplinary programmes. Intervention groups tended to achieve earlier and greater mobilisation. Key modifiable barriers were pain, fatigue, and limited physiotherapy staffing. All studies reported physical performance outcomes; only one reported quality of life outcomes.</div><div>This scoping review found heterogeneity in the delivery, dose, timing, and adherence to mobility interventions. Barriers to mobilisation after emergency laparotomy mirror those described after elective surgery. We suggest alignment in reporting the impact of individual factors (such as frailty and socioeconomic context) and core outcomes (including patient-centred measures) to standardise early postoperative mobilisation interventions and allow for synthesis of the evidence base.</div></div><div><h3>Scoping review protocol</h3><div>Open Science Framework (https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/R63CP).</div></div>","PeriodicalId":72418,"journal":{"name":"BJA open","volume":"16 ","pages":"Article 100501"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145417565","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
New persistent opioid use after surgery and traumatic injury: a narrative review of global rates, risk factors, and healthcare interventions 手术和创伤性损伤后新的持续阿片类药物使用:对全球发生率、风险因素和卫生保健干预措施的叙述性回顾
Pub Date : 2025-12-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.bjao.2025.100509
Thuy Bui , Michael J. Dooley , J. Simon Bell , Paul S. Myles
Up to one-third of patients are discharged with opioids after surgery, and up to one-half after traumatic injury, with usage typically intended for the short term. Evidence on persistent opioid use predominantly originates from North America, particularly the USA, and focuses on the elective surgical population. Definitions of new persistent opioid use vary widely, particularly in how opioid-naïve patients are classified and continued use is measured. The reported incidence of new persistent opioid use after surgery and trauma ranges from <1% to 41%, depending on the population, setting, and definition used. Although patient characteristics and factors related to surgery and trauma care are key risk factors, many of which are not readily modifiable, opioid prescribing practices represent a modifiable and actionable target for intervention. Understanding these risks can assist healthcare providers in implementing alternative management strategies to promote judicious opioid prescribing and reduce persistent opioid use. High-income countries with substantial opioid-related harms have implemented various strategies, ranging from national to hospital-level initiatives, to reduce prescribing and limit opioid exposure after hospital discharge. A priority is the development and adoption of standardised definitions, which consider the various opioid medications, incorporate different data sources, and clearly define thresholds for duration and quantity of use. Further research on new persistent opioid use in more regions, after trauma, targeted interventions, and their impact on patient-centred outcomes is needed.
多达三分之一的患者在手术后使用阿片类药物出院,多达一半的患者在创伤后使用阿片类药物,通常用于短期使用。关于阿片类药物持续使用的证据主要来自北美,特别是美国,并侧重于选择性手术人群。新的阿片类药物持续使用的定义差异很大,特别是在如何对opioid-naïve患者进行分类和测量持续使用方面。据报道,手术和创伤后新的持续阿片类药物使用的发生率从1%到41%不等,这取决于人群、环境和使用的定义。尽管与手术和创伤护理相关的患者特征和因素是关键的风险因素,其中许多因素不易改变,但阿片类药物处方实践代表了一个可改变和可操作的干预目标。了解这些风险可以帮助医疗保健提供者实施替代管理策略,以促进明智的阿片类药物处方和减少阿片类药物的持续使用。存在大量阿片类药物相关危害的高收入国家实施了从国家到医院一级的各种战略,以减少处方和限制出院后的阿片类药物暴露。一个优先事项是制定和采用标准化定义,其中考虑到各种阿片类药物,纳入不同的数据来源,并明确定义持续时间和使用数量的阈值。需要进一步研究更多地区在创伤后新的持续使用阿片类药物,有针对性的干预措施及其对以患者为中心的结果的影响。
{"title":"New persistent opioid use after surgery and traumatic injury: a narrative review of global rates, risk factors, and healthcare interventions","authors":"Thuy Bui ,&nbsp;Michael J. Dooley ,&nbsp;J. Simon Bell ,&nbsp;Paul S. Myles","doi":"10.1016/j.bjao.2025.100509","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.bjao.2025.100509","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Up to one-third of patients are discharged with opioids after surgery, and up to one-half after traumatic injury, with usage typically intended for the short term. Evidence on persistent opioid use predominantly originates from North America, particularly the USA, and focuses on the elective surgical population. Definitions of new persistent opioid use vary widely, particularly in how opioid-naïve patients are classified and continued use is measured. The reported incidence of new persistent opioid use after surgery and trauma ranges from &lt;1% to 41%, depending on the population, setting, and definition used. Although patient characteristics and factors related to surgery and trauma care are key risk factors, many of which are not readily modifiable, opioid prescribing practices represent a modifiable and actionable target for intervention. Understanding these risks can assist healthcare providers in implementing alternative management strategies to promote judicious opioid prescribing and reduce persistent opioid use. High-income countries with substantial opioid-related harms have implemented various strategies, ranging from national to hospital-level initiatives, to reduce prescribing and limit opioid exposure after hospital discharge. A priority is the development and adoption of standardised definitions, which consider the various opioid medications, incorporate different data sources, and clearly define thresholds for duration and quantity of use. Further research on new persistent opioid use in more regions, after trauma, targeted interventions, and their impact on patient-centred outcomes is needed.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":72418,"journal":{"name":"BJA open","volume":"16 ","pages":"Article 100509"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145694170","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
BJA open
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1