首页 > 最新文献

BJUI compass最新文献

英文 中文
Trends in incidence and demographics of testicular cancer in California, 2000–2020 2000-2020 年加利福尼亚州睾丸癌发病率和人口统计趋势。
IF 1.6 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Pub Date : 2024-10-30 DOI: 10.1002/bco2.451
David J. Benjamin, Anshu Shrestha, Dimitra Fellman, Arash Rezazadeh Kalebasty
<p>The incidence of testicular cancer has been rising globally among young adult men for the past five decades for reasons not currently well-understood.<span><sup>1</sup></span> Although a rare genitourinary malignancy that is generally curable, testicular cancer remains a significant public health concern due to long-term medical, psychological and social burden associated with treatment and its short- and long-term toxicities.<span><sup>2</sup></span> Risk factors leading to the development of testicular cancer include age, family or personal history of testicular cancer, cryptorchidism, race/ethnicity and recreational drug use such as marijuana.<span><sup>1</sup></span></p><p>White males have historically had the highest incidence rates of testicular cancer, while Black males have the lowest incidence rates. However, data from 2001 to 2016 extracted from the National Cancer Institute's Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) programme demonstrated that the incidence of testicular cancer was rising throughout the United States and Asian/Pacific Islander men had the largest increases in incidence followed by Hispanic men.<span><sup>3</sup></span> Given that California is the most populous state in the United States and one of the most racially/ethnically diverse populations, we sought to evaluate trends in demographics including race/ethnicity from updated population data up to the year 2020.</p><p>Males diagnosed with testicular cancer between 2000 and 2020 were identified through the California Cancer Registry (CCR) database, one of the largest cancer registries in the United States. Cases were excluded if the age at the time of diagnosis was unknown. Incidence rates per 100 000, stratified by year of diagnosis, race/ethnicity and age were calculated, and age-adjusted to the 2000 US Standard Population. This study involved analysis of de-identified data from the state-mandated cancer registry database and as such, does not require patient informed consent. Therefore, the study was exempt from Institutional Review Board (IRB) approval.</p><p>We identified a total of 23 214 cases of testicular cancer during the study period. Most men (71.5%, <i>n</i> = 16 599) were below age 40 at the time of diagnosis. The majority of men were non-Hispanic white (52.5%, <i>n</i> = 12 191), followed by Hispanic (37.6%, <i>n</i> = 8720), Asian/Pacific Islander (5.0%, <i>n</i> = 1170) and non-Hispanic Black (1.8%, <i>n</i> = 422). Testicular cancer diagnoses were equally distributed between neighbourhood socio-economic status (nSES) groups (highest quintile (20.3%), upper-middle (21.3%), middle (21.0%), lower-middle (20.2%) and lowest (17.3%)). Additional demographic information including marital status and Charlson comorbidity index are available in Table S1.</p><p>Testicular cancer incidence rate rose among all racial/ethnic groups in California between 2000 and 2020. The rates rose at a faster pace among Hispanic and Asian/Pacific Islander men durin
{"title":"Trends in incidence and demographics of testicular cancer in California, 2000–2020","authors":"David J. Benjamin,&nbsp;Anshu Shrestha,&nbsp;Dimitra Fellman,&nbsp;Arash Rezazadeh Kalebasty","doi":"10.1002/bco2.451","DOIUrl":"10.1002/bco2.451","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;The incidence of testicular cancer has been rising globally among young adult men for the past five decades for reasons not currently well-understood.&lt;span&gt;&lt;sup&gt;1&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/span&gt; Although a rare genitourinary malignancy that is generally curable, testicular cancer remains a significant public health concern due to long-term medical, psychological and social burden associated with treatment and its short- and long-term toxicities.&lt;span&gt;&lt;sup&gt;2&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/span&gt; Risk factors leading to the development of testicular cancer include age, family or personal history of testicular cancer, cryptorchidism, race/ethnicity and recreational drug use such as marijuana.&lt;span&gt;&lt;sup&gt;1&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;White males have historically had the highest incidence rates of testicular cancer, while Black males have the lowest incidence rates. However, data from 2001 to 2016 extracted from the National Cancer Institute's Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) programme demonstrated that the incidence of testicular cancer was rising throughout the United States and Asian/Pacific Islander men had the largest increases in incidence followed by Hispanic men.&lt;span&gt;&lt;sup&gt;3&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/span&gt; Given that California is the most populous state in the United States and one of the most racially/ethnically diverse populations, we sought to evaluate trends in demographics including race/ethnicity from updated population data up to the year 2020.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Males diagnosed with testicular cancer between 2000 and 2020 were identified through the California Cancer Registry (CCR) database, one of the largest cancer registries in the United States. Cases were excluded if the age at the time of diagnosis was unknown. Incidence rates per 100 000, stratified by year of diagnosis, race/ethnicity and age were calculated, and age-adjusted to the 2000 US Standard Population. This study involved analysis of de-identified data from the state-mandated cancer registry database and as such, does not require patient informed consent. Therefore, the study was exempt from Institutional Review Board (IRB) approval.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;We identified a total of 23 214 cases of testicular cancer during the study period. Most men (71.5%, &lt;i&gt;n&lt;/i&gt; = 16 599) were below age 40 at the time of diagnosis. The majority of men were non-Hispanic white (52.5%, &lt;i&gt;n&lt;/i&gt; = 12 191), followed by Hispanic (37.6%, &lt;i&gt;n&lt;/i&gt; = 8720), Asian/Pacific Islander (5.0%, &lt;i&gt;n&lt;/i&gt; = 1170) and non-Hispanic Black (1.8%, &lt;i&gt;n&lt;/i&gt; = 422). Testicular cancer diagnoses were equally distributed between neighbourhood socio-economic status (nSES) groups (highest quintile (20.3%), upper-middle (21.3%), middle (21.0%), lower-middle (20.2%) and lowest (17.3%)). Additional demographic information including marital status and Charlson comorbidity index are available in Table S1.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Testicular cancer incidence rate rose among all racial/ethnic groups in California between 2000 and 2020. The rates rose at a faster pace among Hispanic and Asian/Pacific Islander men durin","PeriodicalId":72420,"journal":{"name":"BJUI compass","volume":"5 12","pages":"1249-1251"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2024-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11685165/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142916415","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Investigating the prognostic utility of GSTP1 promoter methylation in prostate cancer 研究前列腺癌中GSTP1启动子甲基化对预后的影响。
IF 1.6 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Pub Date : 2024-10-30 DOI: 10.1002/bco2.445
Ruth Pidsley, Dilys Lam, Wenjia Qu, Phillip Stricker, James G. Kench, Lisa G. Horvath, Susan J. Clark

Objectives

We aim to determine the prognostic significance of glutathione S-transferase Pi 1 DNA methylation (mGSTP1) in two independent prostate cancer cohorts with long-term clinical follow-up data.

Subjects/Patients and Methods

We first re-examined a published, in-house whole genome bisulphite sequencing (WGBS) prostate cancer dataset, derived from radical prostatectomy (RP) tissue (n = 15) with median follow-up 19.5 years, to confirm and visualise the association between mGSTP1 and patient mortality. To validate prognostic significance, we used a quantitative methylation-specific head-loop (MS-HL) assay to measure mGSTP1 levels in a larger, independent cohort (n = 186), and performed univariable and multivariable Cox survival analysis.

Results

Re-analysis of WGBS data showed a significant increase in mGSTP1 in RP samples from patients with lethal versus non-lethal disease. Subsequent analysis in the larger cohort using the MS-HL assay confirmed that mGSTP1 was detectable in 97% of RP samples, validating the diagnostic potential of mGSTP1. Univariable Cox survival analysis revealed a significant association between mGSTP1 levels and biochemical recurrence and metastatic relapse free survival, with a near-significant association with prostate cancer specific mortality. Notably, multivariable Cox models demonstrated that mGSTP1 did not add independent prognostic value beyond standard clinicopathological features.

Conclusion

Our study supports the importance of DNA methylation as a tissue-based prostate tumour biomarker. GSTP1 methylation is well established as a diagnostic marker, and in this study, we find that GSTP1 methylation levels are also associated with disease prognosis. Further research is required into the clinical utility of prognostic methylation markers and their functional role in disease progression.

目的:我们的目的是确定谷胱甘肽s -转移酶Pi 1 DNA甲基化(mGSTP1)在两个独立的前列腺癌队列中的预后意义,并进行长期临床随访。受试者/患者和方法:我们首先重新检查了已发表的内部全基因组亚硫酸酯测序(WGBS)前列腺癌数据集,该数据集来自根治性前列腺切除术(RP)组织(n = 15),中位随访19.5年,以确认和可视化mGSTP1与患者死亡率之间的关系。为了验证预后意义,我们在一个更大的独立队列(n = 186)中使用定量甲基化特异性头环(MS-HL)测定mGSTP1水平,并进行单变量和多变量Cox生存分析。结果:WGBS数据的重新分析显示,致死性疾病与非致死性疾病患者的RP样本中mGSTP1显著增加。随后在更大的队列中使用MS-HL法进行分析,证实97%的RP样本中可检测到mGSTP1,验证了mGSTP1的诊断潜力。单变量Cox生存分析显示,mGSTP1水平与生化复发和转移性无复发生存有显著相关性,与前列腺癌特异性死亡率有近显著相关性。值得注意的是,多变量Cox模型表明,除了标准临床病理特征外,mGSTP1并没有增加独立的预后价值。结论:我们的研究支持DNA甲基化作为一种基于组织的前列腺肿瘤生物标志物的重要性。GSTP1甲基化已被公认为诊断标志物,在本研究中,我们发现GSTP1甲基化水平也与疾病预后相关。预后甲基化标记物的临床应用及其在疾病进展中的功能作用有待进一步研究。
{"title":"Investigating the prognostic utility of GSTP1 promoter methylation in prostate cancer","authors":"Ruth Pidsley,&nbsp;Dilys Lam,&nbsp;Wenjia Qu,&nbsp;Phillip Stricker,&nbsp;James G. Kench,&nbsp;Lisa G. Horvath,&nbsp;Susan J. Clark","doi":"10.1002/bco2.445","DOIUrl":"10.1002/bco2.445","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Objectives</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>We aim to determine the prognostic significance of <i>glutathione S-transferase Pi 1</i> DNA methylation (<i>mGSTP1</i>) in two independent prostate cancer cohorts with long-term clinical follow-up data.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Subjects/Patients and Methods</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>We first re-examined a published, in-house whole genome bisulphite sequencing (WGBS) prostate cancer dataset, derived from radical prostatectomy (RP) tissue (<i>n</i> = 15) with median follow-up 19.5 years, to confirm and visualise the association between <i>mGSTP1</i> and patient mortality. To validate prognostic significance, we used a quantitative methylation-specific head-loop (MS-HL) assay to measure <i>mGSTP1</i> levels in a larger, independent cohort (<i>n</i> = 186), and performed univariable and multivariable Cox survival analysis.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Results</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Re-analysis of WGBS data showed a significant increase in <i>mGSTP1</i> in RP samples from patients with lethal versus non-lethal disease. Subsequent analysis in the larger cohort using the MS-HL assay confirmed that <i>mGSTP1</i> was detectable in 97% of RP samples, validating the diagnostic potential of <i>mGSTP1</i>. Univariable Cox survival analysis revealed a significant association between <i>mGSTP1</i> levels and biochemical recurrence and metastatic relapse free survival, with a near-significant association with prostate cancer specific mortality. Notably, multivariable Cox models demonstrated that <i>mGSTP1</i> did not add independent prognostic value beyond standard clinicopathological features.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Conclusion</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Our study supports the importance of DNA methylation as a tissue-based prostate tumour biomarker. <i>GSTP1</i> methylation is well established as a diagnostic marker, and in this study, we find that <i>GSTP1</i> methylation levels are also associated with disease prognosis. Further research is required into the clinical utility of prognostic methylation markers and their functional role in disease progression.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":72420,"journal":{"name":"BJUI compass","volume":"5 12","pages":"1299-1306"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2024-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11685177/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142916378","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Comparing outcomes of Aquablation versus holmium laser enucleation of prostate in the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia: A network meta-analysis 水消融与钬激光前列腺摘除治疗良性前列腺增生的疗效比较:网络荟萃分析。
IF 1.6 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Pub Date : 2024-10-30 DOI: 10.1002/bco2.454
Ansh Bhatia, Renil Titus, Joao G. Porto, Rajvi Goradia, Khushi Shah, Diana Lopategui, Thomas R. W. Herrmann, Hemendra N. Shah
<div> <section> <h3> Introduction</h3> <p>Water Jet Ablation Therapy (WJAT) and Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate (HoLEP) represent two common surgical treatments for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH). Despite their increasing use, there is no study between these two methods. We aim to evaluate their efficacy and safety through a network meta-analysis (NMA), providing critical insights for clinical decision-making in the management of moderate to severe lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) due to BPH.</p> </section> <section> <h3> Methods</h3> <p>Pubmed, EMBASE and Cochrane Library were searched. Randomized controlled trials and prospective single-arm studies comparing WJAT and HoLEP with TURP, reporting symptom scores, flow rates and adverse events. Data extraction and quality assessments were independently performed. Bayesian modelling in RStudio was used for statistical analysis, evaluating continuous outcomes through mean difference and categorical variables via risk ratios. Risk-of-Bias (RoB) and GRADE assessments were performed.</p> </section> <section> <h3> Findings</h3> <p>Twenty-three studies were included (WJAT-11, HoLEP-12). Most studies were at some or high risk of bias. At 12 months, the IPSS, Qol, PVR and Qmax improvements were 4.14 points (95% CI: -0.34 to 8.64, not-significant [NS], GRADE-rating: Low), 0.32-points (95% CI:-10.70 to 3.27, NS, GRADE-rating: Low), 2.45 ml/s (95% CI: -1.85 to 7.05, NS, GRADE-rating: Low), 63.10 ml (95% CI: 39.80 to 87.30, statistically-significant [SS], GRADE-rating: Moderate), respectively, all in favour of HoLEP. Haemoglobin-loss was lower with HoLEP, 1.16 g/dl (95% CI: -2.56 to 0.54 mg/dl, NS, GRADE-rating: Moderate) than WJAT. The risk of incontinence was higher with HoLEP; 4.48 (95% CI: 0.22 to 168.50, NS, GRADE-rating: Very Low) than WJAT in single–arm analysis. The risk of blood transfusion was higher with WJAT (RR = 0.14; 95% CI: 0.00 to 4.21, NS, GRADE-rating: Low) than HoLEP. Risk of Total Serious Adverse Events (Clavien-Dindo grade>3) was higher with HoLEP (RR = 1.12, higher with HoLEP, 95% CI: 0.20 to 12.71, NS, GRADE-rating: Low) than WJAT. Retreatment was lower with HoLEP (RR = 0.46, 95% CI: 0.02 to 10.54 GRADE-rating: Low) than WJAT.</p> </section> <section> <h3> Interpretation</h3> <p>Our study suggests that both HoLEP and WJAT are effective treatments for BPH, both with similar IPSS and QoL improvements. HoLEP excels in functional outcomes, particularly in improving Qmax and PVR. Conversely, WJAT, with its shorter operation time and hospital stays, presents a compelling alter
导读:水射流消融治疗(WJAT)和钬激光前列腺摘除(HoLEP)是治疗良性前列腺增生(BPH)的两种常用手术治疗方法。尽管这两种方法的使用越来越多,但没有对它们进行研究。我们的目标是通过网络meta分析(NMA)评估它们的疗效和安全性,为BPH引起的中重度下尿路症状(LUTS)的临床决策提供关键见解。方法:检索Pubmed、EMBASE、Cochrane图书馆。随机对照试验和前瞻性单臂研究比较WJAT和HoLEP与TURP,报告症状评分、血流率和不良事件。数据提取和质量评估独立进行。使用RStudio中的贝叶斯模型进行统计分析,通过平均差异评估连续结果,通过风险比评估分类变量。进行了风险偏倚(RoB)和GRADE评估。结果:纳入23项研究(WJAT-11, HoLEP-12)。大多数研究存在一定或较高的偏倚风险。在12个月时,IPSS、Qol、PVR和Qmax的改善分别为4.14点(95% CI: -0.34至8.64,无统计学意义[NS], GRADE-rating:低)、0.32点(95% CI:-10.70至3.27,NS, GRADE-rating:低)、2.45 ml/s (95% CI: -1.85至7.05,NS, GRADE-rating:低)、63.10 ml (95% CI: 39.80至87.30,有统计学意义[SS], GRADE-rating:中等),均有利于HoLEP。与WJAT相比,HoLEP组的血红蛋白损失较低,为1.16 g/dl (95% CI: -2.56 ~ 0.54 mg/dl, NS, grade rating: Moderate)。HoLEP患者发生尿失禁的风险较高;4.48 (95% CI: 0.22 ~ 168.50, NS, grade评级:非常低)比WJAT单臂分析。WJAT组输血风险较高(RR = 0.14;95% CI: 0.00 - 4.21, NS, grade评分:低)。总严重不良事件风险(Clavien-Dindo分级bbbb3)在HoLEP组高于WJAT组(RR = 1.12, HoLEP组较高,95% CI: 0.20 ~ 12.71, NS, grade评分:低)。与WJAT相比,HoLEP组的再治疗率较低(RR = 0.46, 95% CI: 0.02 ~ 10.54)。我们的研究表明,HoLEP和WJAT都是BPH的有效治疗方法,两者的IPSS和QoL改善相似。HoLEP在功能预后方面表现突出,特别是在改善Qmax和PVR方面。相反,WJAT手术时间和住院时间较短,是一种令人信服的替代方案,特别是在门诊环境中。
{"title":"Comparing outcomes of Aquablation versus holmium laser enucleation of prostate in the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia: A network meta-analysis","authors":"Ansh Bhatia,&nbsp;Renil Titus,&nbsp;Joao G. Porto,&nbsp;Rajvi Goradia,&nbsp;Khushi Shah,&nbsp;Diana Lopategui,&nbsp;Thomas R. W. Herrmann,&nbsp;Hemendra N. Shah","doi":"10.1002/bco2.454","DOIUrl":"10.1002/bco2.454","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;div&gt;\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 &lt;section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;h3&gt; Introduction&lt;/h3&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;p&gt;Water Jet Ablation Therapy (WJAT) and Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate (HoLEP) represent two common surgical treatments for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH). Despite their increasing use, there is no study between these two methods. We aim to evaluate their efficacy and safety through a network meta-analysis (NMA), providing critical insights for clinical decision-making in the management of moderate to severe lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) due to BPH.&lt;/p&gt;\u0000 &lt;/section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;h3&gt; Methods&lt;/h3&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;p&gt;Pubmed, EMBASE and Cochrane Library were searched. Randomized controlled trials and prospective single-arm studies comparing WJAT and HoLEP with TURP, reporting symptom scores, flow rates and adverse events. Data extraction and quality assessments were independently performed. Bayesian modelling in RStudio was used for statistical analysis, evaluating continuous outcomes through mean difference and categorical variables via risk ratios. Risk-of-Bias (RoB) and GRADE assessments were performed.&lt;/p&gt;\u0000 &lt;/section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;h3&gt; Findings&lt;/h3&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;p&gt;Twenty-three studies were included (WJAT-11, HoLEP-12). Most studies were at some or high risk of bias. At 12 months, the IPSS, Qol, PVR and Qmax improvements were 4.14 points (95% CI: -0.34 to 8.64, not-significant [NS], GRADE-rating: Low), 0.32-points (95% CI:-10.70 to 3.27, NS, GRADE-rating: Low), 2.45 ml/s (95% CI: -1.85 to 7.05, NS, GRADE-rating: Low), 63.10 ml (95% CI: 39.80 to 87.30, statistically-significant [SS], GRADE-rating: Moderate), respectively, all in favour of HoLEP. Haemoglobin-loss was lower with HoLEP, 1.16 g/dl (95% CI: -2.56 to 0.54 mg/dl, NS, GRADE-rating: Moderate) than WJAT. The risk of incontinence was higher with HoLEP; 4.48 (95% CI: 0.22 to 168.50, NS, GRADE-rating: Very Low) than WJAT in single–arm analysis. The risk of blood transfusion was higher with WJAT (RR = 0.14; 95% CI: 0.00 to 4.21, NS, GRADE-rating: Low) than HoLEP. Risk of Total Serious Adverse Events (Clavien-Dindo grade&gt;3) was higher with HoLEP (RR = 1.12, higher with HoLEP, 95% CI: 0.20 to 12.71, NS, GRADE-rating: Low) than WJAT. Retreatment was lower with HoLEP (RR = 0.46, 95% CI: 0.02 to 10.54 GRADE-rating: Low) than WJAT.&lt;/p&gt;\u0000 &lt;/section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;h3&gt; Interpretation&lt;/h3&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;p&gt;Our study suggests that both HoLEP and WJAT are effective treatments for BPH, both with similar IPSS and QoL improvements. HoLEP excels in functional outcomes, particularly in improving Qmax and PVR. Conversely, WJAT, with its shorter operation time and hospital stays, presents a compelling alter","PeriodicalId":72420,"journal":{"name":"BJUI compass","volume":"5 12","pages":"1231-1245"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2024-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11685169/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142916396","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Targeted microwave ablation of localised prostate cancer: Initial results of VIOLETTE trial 靶向微波消融局部前列腺癌:VIOLETTE试验的初步结果。
IF 1.6 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Pub Date : 2024-10-30 DOI: 10.1002/bco2.444
Nicolas Barry Delongchamps, Alexandre Peltier, Eric Potiron, Franck Bladou, Julien Anract, Romain Diamand, Grégoire Robert, Aurel Messas, Roland Van Velthoven

Objective

The aim of this study was to assess the precision and safety of targeted microwave ablation (TMA) using organ-based tracking (OBT) fusion, in patients with intermediate risk prostate cancer.

Patients and method

We conducted a prospective, multicentric trial. Eligible patients had a prostate-specific antigen (PSA) < 20 ng/mL, a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-visible index tumour of Gleason score 3 + 4, with largest axis ≤15 mm and distant of at least 5 mm from the rectum and apex. TMA was performed with microwave needle applicator using OBT fusion, with a transperineal or a transrectal approach. In this interim analysis, we evaluated precision, safety, urinary and sexual outcomes, and PSA density kinetics.

Results

At this point, 37 patients were treated in five centres. Median (interquartile range) age is 68 (63–72) years. Baseline median prostate volume and PSA are of 45 (34–57) mL and 8 (6.2–10.8) ng/mL, respectively. Median largest tumour axis on T2W MRI is of 11 mm (10–13). Patients were treated under general anaesthesia or conscious IV sedation in an outpatient setting. Anaesthesia had a median duration of 78 (66–90) min. A median number of 3 (2–4) 12-W ablations of 2 to 5 min were performed per patient. After a median follow-up of 6 (2.4–10) months, we observed 58 adverse events (AE) in 22 patients. These were of Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade 1, 2 and 3 in 43 (74%), 13 (22%) and 2 (4%) cases. Six (15%) patients had an acute urinary retention, five of which considered as severe AE because of rehospitalisation. We did not observe any significant difference in International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), Male Sexual Health Questionnaire-ejaculatory dysfunction (MSHQ-EjD) and International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF5) from baseline to last follow-up. Median PSA density evolved from 0.2 (0.1–0.3) at baseline to 0.1 (0.07–0.16) at 12 months.

Conclusions

These preliminary results suggest that TMA using OBT fusion is precise and safe in patients with intermediate risk localised prostate cancer. Further inclusions and follow-up are needed to assess oncological outcome.

目的:本研究的目的是评估基于器官追踪(OBT)融合的靶向微波消融(TMA)治疗中危前列腺癌患者的准确性和安全性。患者和方法:我们进行了一项前瞻性、多中心试验。符合条件的患者有前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)结果:在这一点上,37名患者在5个中心接受了治疗。年龄中位数(四分位数间距)为68岁(63-72岁)。基线中位前列腺体积和PSA分别为45 (34-57)mL和8 (6.2-10.8)ng/mL。T2W MRI上最大肿瘤轴中位数为11 mm(10-13)。患者在门诊接受全身麻醉或清醒静脉镇静治疗。麻醉的中位持续时间为78(66-90)分钟。每位患者平均进行3(2-4)次12-W消融,消融时间为2- 5分钟。中位随访6(2.4-10)个月后,22例患者观察到58例不良事件(AE)。43例(74%)、13例(22%)和2例(4%)的不良事件通用术语标准(CTCAE)为1级、2级和3级。6例(15%)患者有急性尿潴留,其中5例因再次住院被认为是严重AE。国际前列腺症状评分(IPSS)、男性性健康问卷-射精功能障碍(MSHQ-EjD)、国际勃起功能指数(IIEF5)自基线至末次随访无显著差异。中位PSA密度从基线时的0.2(0.1-0.3)上升到12个月时的0.1(0.07-0.16)。结论:这些初步结果表明,在中度危险的局限性前列腺癌患者中,使用OBT融合的TMA是精确和安全的。需要进一步的纳入和随访来评估肿瘤预后。
{"title":"Targeted microwave ablation of localised prostate cancer: Initial results of VIOLETTE trial","authors":"Nicolas Barry Delongchamps,&nbsp;Alexandre Peltier,&nbsp;Eric Potiron,&nbsp;Franck Bladou,&nbsp;Julien Anract,&nbsp;Romain Diamand,&nbsp;Grégoire Robert,&nbsp;Aurel Messas,&nbsp;Roland Van Velthoven","doi":"10.1002/bco2.444","DOIUrl":"10.1002/bco2.444","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Objective</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>The aim of this study was to assess the precision and safety of targeted microwave ablation (TMA) using organ-based tracking (OBT) fusion, in patients with intermediate risk prostate cancer.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Patients and method</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>We conducted a prospective, multicentric trial. Eligible patients had a prostate-specific antigen (PSA) &lt; 20 ng/mL, a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-visible index tumour of Gleason score 3 + 4, with largest axis ≤15 mm and distant of at least 5 mm from the rectum and apex. TMA was performed with microwave needle applicator using OBT fusion, with a transperineal or a transrectal approach. In this interim analysis, we evaluated precision, safety, urinary and sexual outcomes, and PSA density kinetics.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Results</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>At this point, 37 patients were treated in five centres. Median (interquartile range) age is 68 (63–72) years. Baseline median prostate volume and PSA are of 45 (34–57) mL and 8 (6.2–10.8) ng/mL, respectively. Median largest tumour axis on T2W MRI is of 11 mm (10–13). Patients were treated under general anaesthesia or conscious IV sedation in an outpatient setting. Anaesthesia had a median duration of 78 (66–90) min. A median number of 3 (2–4) 12-W ablations of 2 to 5 min were performed per patient. After a median follow-up of 6 (2.4–10) months, we observed 58 adverse events (AE) in 22 patients. These were of Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade 1, 2 and 3 in 43 (74%), 13 (22%) and 2 (4%) cases. Six (15%) patients had an acute urinary retention, five of which considered as severe AE because of rehospitalisation. We did not observe any significant difference in International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), Male Sexual Health Questionnaire-ejaculatory dysfunction (MSHQ-EjD) and International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF5) from baseline to last follow-up. Median PSA density evolved from 0.2 (0.1–0.3) at baseline to 0.1 (0.07–0.16) at 12 months.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Conclusions</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>These preliminary results suggest that TMA using OBT fusion is precise and safe in patients with intermediate risk localised prostate cancer. Further inclusions and follow-up are needed to assess oncological outcome.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":72420,"journal":{"name":"BJUI compass","volume":"5 12","pages":"1307-1313"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2024-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11685167/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142916413","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Robot-assisted laparoscopic continent cutaneous urinary diversion in adults: A single-centre study 机器人辅助腹腔镜成人大陆性皮下尿流改道术:单中心研究
IF 1.6 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Pub Date : 2024-10-30 DOI: 10.1002/bco2.449
Thomas Loubersac, Etienne Lavallée, Benédicte Reiss, Marc Lefort, Pierre Kieny, Marc-David Leclair, Jérome Rigaud, Loic Le Normand, Brigitte Perrouin-Verbe, Chloé Lefevre, Marie-Aimée Perrouin-Verbe

Objectives

To show that robot-assisted laparoscopic cutaneous continent urinary diversion (RALCCUD) is feasible and safe; however, data on clinical outcomes in adults are lacking.

Materials and methods

We conducted a retrospective study of all adults who underwent RALCCUD between 2017 and 2022 at a single tertiary reference centre.

Patient characteristics, clinical information and perioperative outcomes were recorded. All patients underwent pre- and postoperative urodynamic evaluations.

Functional outcomes were evaluated at 3 months, then yearly. Continence was defined as no stomal or urethral leakage.

Results

Twelve patients, mostly women (n = 11), median (IQR) age 47.4 (19–57) years underwent RALCCUD (four Mitrofanoff, four Yang-Monti and four Casale). The main indication for surgery was inability to perform intermittent self-catheterization through the native urethra.

Eleven patients (92%) had neurogenic lower urinary tract disease caused by spinal cord injury or spinal dysraphism.

Median (IQR) operative time was 313 (285–367) min. Four patients (33%) underwent concomitant procedures: three supratrigonal cystectomy (SC) with augmentation cystoplasty (AC) and one artificial urinary sphincter (AUS). No conversions to an open approach were required. Median (IQR) follow-up was 51 (40–61) months. One early postoperative complication occurred (Clavien grade III). The late postoperative complication rate was 17%, with three complications occurring in three patients.

At the last follow-up, all patients could self-catheterize through the tube, and the stomal and urethral continence rate was 100%.

Conclusion

RALCCUD is feasible and safe in adults, with a high rate of stomal and urethral continence and a low complication rate.

目的:探讨机器人辅助腹腔镜下皮肤尿潴留术(RALCCUD)的可行性和安全性;然而,缺乏成人临床结果的数据。材料和方法:我们对2017年至2022年间在单一三级参考中心接受RALCCUD的所有成年人进行了回顾性研究。记录患者特征、临床信息及围手术期结果。所有患者均进行了术前和术后尿动力学评估。3个月时评估功能结果,然后每年评估一次。尿失禁被定义为无瘘口或尿道渗漏。结果:12例患者行RALCCUD,多数为女性(n = 11),中位(IQR)年龄47.4(19-57)岁(Mitrofanoff 4例,Yang-Monti 4例,Casale 4例)。手术的主要指征是无法通过原生尿道进行间歇性自我导尿。11例(92%)患者有脊髓损伤或脊柱异常所致的神经源性下尿路疾病。中位(IQR)手术时间为313(285-367)分钟。4例(33%)患者接受了合并手术:3例肛上膀胱切除术(SC)加膀胱增强成形术(AC)和1例人工尿道括约肌(AUS)。不需要转换为开放方法。中位(IQR)随访时间为51(40-61)个月。术后早期并发症1例(Clavienⅲ级),术后晚期并发症发生率为17%,3例患者出现3例并发症。最后一次随访时,所有患者均能自行置管,口尿失禁率为100%。结论:RALCCUD在成人手术中是可行和安全的,具有高的口尿失禁率和低的并发症发生率。
{"title":"Robot-assisted laparoscopic continent cutaneous urinary diversion in adults: A single-centre study","authors":"Thomas Loubersac,&nbsp;Etienne Lavallée,&nbsp;Benédicte Reiss,&nbsp;Marc Lefort,&nbsp;Pierre Kieny,&nbsp;Marc-David Leclair,&nbsp;Jérome Rigaud,&nbsp;Loic Le Normand,&nbsp;Brigitte Perrouin-Verbe,&nbsp;Chloé Lefevre,&nbsp;Marie-Aimée Perrouin-Verbe","doi":"10.1002/bco2.449","DOIUrl":"10.1002/bco2.449","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Objectives</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>To show that robot-assisted laparoscopic cutaneous continent urinary diversion (RALCCUD) is feasible and safe; however, data on clinical outcomes in adults are lacking.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Materials and methods</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>We conducted a retrospective study of all adults who underwent RALCCUD between 2017 and 2022 at a single tertiary reference centre.</p>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Patient characteristics, clinical information and perioperative outcomes were recorded. All patients underwent pre- and postoperative urodynamic evaluations.</p>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Functional outcomes were evaluated at 3 months, then yearly. Continence was defined as no stomal or urethral leakage.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Results</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Twelve patients, mostly women (<i>n</i> = 11), median (IQR) age 47.4 (19–57) years underwent RALCCUD (four Mitrofanoff, four Yang-Monti and four Casale). The main indication for surgery was inability to perform intermittent self-catheterization through the native urethra.</p>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Eleven patients (92%) had neurogenic lower urinary tract disease caused by spinal cord injury or spinal dysraphism.</p>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Median (IQR) operative time was 313 (285–367) min. Four patients (33%) underwent concomitant procedures: three supratrigonal cystectomy (SC) with augmentation cystoplasty (AC) and one artificial urinary sphincter (AUS). No conversions to an open approach were required. Median (IQR) follow-up was 51 (40–61) months. One early postoperative complication occurred (Clavien grade III). The late postoperative complication rate was 17%, with three complications occurring in three patients.</p>\u0000 \u0000 <p>At the last follow-up, all patients could self-catheterize through the tube, and the stomal and urethral continence rate was 100%.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Conclusion</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>RALCCUD is feasible and safe in adults, with a high rate of stomal and urethral continence and a low complication rate.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":72420,"journal":{"name":"BJUI compass","volume":"5 12","pages":"1269-1277"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2024-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11685175/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142916409","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Accuracy of warm ischemia time measurement using a surgical intelligence software in partial nephrectomies: A validation study 在部分肾切除术中使用手术智能软件测量热缺血时间的准确性:一项验证研究。
IF 1.6 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Pub Date : 2024-10-26 DOI: 10.1002/bco2.452
Archan Khandekar, Joao G. Porto, Jean C. Daher, Pedro F. S. Freitas, Dotan Asselman, Maritza M. Suarez, Mark L. Gonzalgo, Dipen J. Parekh, Sanoj Punnen

Objectives

The objectives of this study are to compare the accuracy of warm ischemia times (WITs) derived by a surgical artificial intelligence (AI) software to those documented in surgeon operative reports during partial nephrectomy procedures and to assess the potential of this technology in evaluating postoperative renal function.

Patients and methods

A surgical AI software (Theator Inc., Palo Alto, CA) was used to capture and analyse videos of partial nephrectomies performed between October 2023 and April 2024. The platform utilized computer vision algorithms to detect clamp placement and removal, enabling precise WIT measurement. Expert-reviewed surgical videos served as the ground truth. Platform-derived WITs were compared to those in surgeon operative reports using paired-sample t-tests. Additionally, we analysed the correlation between platform-derived WITs and postoperative creatinine levels extracted from electronic health records (EHRs) integrated via health level seven (HL7) messaging protocols.

Results

Of 64 eligible cases, 61 were included in the final analysis. Platform-derived WITs were within 1 min of the ground truth in all procedures, within 30 s in 97%, and within 10 s in over 80%. The mean difference between platform-derived WITs and ground truth was 8.3 s, significantly lower than the 2.45 min difference for operative reports (p < 0.001). No significant correlation was found between platform-derived WIT and postoperative creatinine changes, aligning with the view that WIT may not independently determine postoperative renal function. Although not the primary goal of this study, significant correlations were observed between WIT, tumour size and RENAL score.

Conclusion

This study demonstrates the high accuracy of a surgical intelligence platform in measuring WIT during partial nephrectomies. The findings support the use of AI-based surgical time measurement for precise intraoperative documentation and highlight the potential of integrating these data with EHRs to advance research on surgical outcomes.

目的:本研究的目的是比较由手术人工智能(AI)软件得出的热缺血时间(WITs)的准确性与外科医生在部分肾切除术过程中的手术报告中记录的准确性,并评估该技术在评估术后肾功能方面的潜力。患者和方法:使用手术人工智能软件(Theator Inc., Palo Alto, CA)捕获和分析2023年10月至2024年4月期间进行的部分肾切除术的视频。该平台利用计算机视觉算法来检测夹具的放置和移除,从而实现精确的WIT测量。专家审查的手术视频是最基本的事实。使用配对样本t检验将平台衍生的WITs与外科医生手术报告中的WITs进行比较。此外,我们分析了平台衍生的WITs与通过健康级别7 (HL7)消息传递协议集成的电子健康记录(EHRs)提取的术后肌酐水平之间的相关性。结果:64例符合条件的病例中,61例纳入最终分析。平台衍生的WITs在所有程序中都在1分钟内,97%在30秒内,超过80%在10秒内。平台得出的WIT与地面真实值的平均差异为8.3 s,显著低于手术报告的2.45 min差异(p)。结论:本研究证明了手术智能平台在部分肾切除术中测量WIT的高准确性。研究结果支持使用基于人工智能的手术时间测量技术进行精确的术中记录,并强调了将这些数据与电子病历相结合以推进手术结果研究的潜力。
{"title":"Accuracy of warm ischemia time measurement using a surgical intelligence software in partial nephrectomies: A validation study","authors":"Archan Khandekar,&nbsp;Joao G. Porto,&nbsp;Jean C. Daher,&nbsp;Pedro F. S. Freitas,&nbsp;Dotan Asselman,&nbsp;Maritza M. Suarez,&nbsp;Mark L. Gonzalgo,&nbsp;Dipen J. Parekh,&nbsp;Sanoj Punnen","doi":"10.1002/bco2.452","DOIUrl":"10.1002/bco2.452","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Objectives</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>The objectives of this study are to compare the accuracy of warm ischemia times (WITs) derived by a surgical artificial intelligence (AI) software to those documented in surgeon operative reports during partial nephrectomy procedures and to assess the potential of this technology in evaluating postoperative renal function.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Patients and methods</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>A surgical AI software (Theator Inc., Palo Alto, CA) was used to capture and analyse videos of partial nephrectomies performed between October 2023 and April 2024. The platform utilized computer vision algorithms to detect clamp placement and removal, enabling precise WIT measurement. Expert-reviewed surgical videos served as the ground truth. Platform-derived WITs were compared to those in surgeon operative reports using paired-sample <i>t</i>-tests. Additionally, we analysed the correlation between platform-derived WITs and postoperative creatinine levels extracted from electronic health records (EHRs) integrated via health level seven (HL7) messaging protocols.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Results</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Of 64 eligible cases, 61 were included in the final analysis. Platform-derived WITs were within 1 min of the ground truth in all procedures, within 30 s in 97%, and within 10 s in over 80%. The mean difference between platform-derived WITs and ground truth was 8.3 s, significantly lower than the 2.45 min difference for operative reports (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). No significant correlation was found between platform-derived WIT and postoperative creatinine changes, aligning with the view that WIT may not independently determine postoperative renal function. Although not the primary goal of this study, significant correlations were observed between WIT, tumour size and RENAL score.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Conclusion</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>This study demonstrates the high accuracy of a surgical intelligence platform in measuring WIT during partial nephrectomies. The findings support the use of AI-based surgical time measurement for precise intraoperative documentation and highlight the potential of integrating these data with EHRs to advance research on surgical outcomes.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":72420,"journal":{"name":"BJUI compass","volume":"5 12","pages":"1263-1268"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2024-10-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11685170/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142916394","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Patients and generative AI: Who owns your diagnosis? 病人和生成人工智能:谁拥有你的诊断?
IF 1.6 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Pub Date : 2024-10-24 DOI: 10.1002/bco2.420
Asher Mandel, Michael DeMeo, Ashutosh Maheshwari, Ash Tewari
<p>Generative artificial intelligence (AI) chatbots, like Open AI's ChatGPT, have revolutionized the way that humans interact with machines. With a recent market capitalization of $80 billion, investors strongly believe that AI has a future role in many industries. Mounting excitement, however, is also met by cautionary discourse regarding the need for ethical shepherding of AI's rollout. Several United States Congress hearings have centred around AI with the media abuzz with its consequences. Controversies yet to be settled include how to address the use of AI in academic publishing, education and medicine, among others.<span><sup>1-3</sup></span> An analysis of public perspectives on comfortability with AI in healthcare, drawn from social media content, found drastic heterogeneity.<span><sup>4</sup></span> Results from a recent Pew survey suggest that higher academic level and experience with AI increases the likelihood of having confidence in AI's ability to enhance medical care.<span><sup>5</sup></span> Nonetheless, natural language processing has already begun its infusion into the medical field with use cases including electrocardiogram interpretation and white blood cell count differentials.<span><sup>6</sup></span></p><p>Urology is no exception in this regard—embracing the benefits of AI by exploring the utility of agents (i.e., text/voice/video chatbots) and evaluating surgical skill.<span><sup>7, 8</sup></span> Some products have already resulted in the United States Food and Drug Administration approval, such as one that assists in localizing prostate tumour volume on magnetic resonance imaging and another that diagnoses prostate cancer on histopathology.<span><sup>9, 10</sup></span></p><p>As AI is increasingly adopted in everyday urology practice, to improve efficiency and quality of care, it is imperative that we consider the looming ethical ramifications proactively. A recent review presented by Dr. Hung et al. has illuminated some of these challenges, stirred conversation and presented possible policy-level solutions.<span><sup>11</sup></span> Nevertheless, urologists have still yet to address several other legal and ethical challenges looming in generative AI model development. This editorial seeks to expand the scope of conversation encompassing necessary considerations for adopting AI in urology.</p><p>Three important issues to consider include the agency of patients and their data, ownership over the models themselves and the potential competition these models may add in the marketplace. Healthcare institutions are charged with being ethical stewards of patient data. This paternal identity may engender a sense of entitlement over the data, and institutions may act as though they own patient data and use that argument in negotiations; however, these data cannot be legally copyrighted. Second, healthcare systems and AI companies are competing and collaborating in this emerging space. Both may be entitled to the products they deve
{"title":"Patients and generative AI: Who owns your diagnosis?","authors":"Asher Mandel,&nbsp;Michael DeMeo,&nbsp;Ashutosh Maheshwari,&nbsp;Ash Tewari","doi":"10.1002/bco2.420","DOIUrl":"10.1002/bco2.420","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;Generative artificial intelligence (AI) chatbots, like Open AI's ChatGPT, have revolutionized the way that humans interact with machines. With a recent market capitalization of $80 billion, investors strongly believe that AI has a future role in many industries. Mounting excitement, however, is also met by cautionary discourse regarding the need for ethical shepherding of AI's rollout. Several United States Congress hearings have centred around AI with the media abuzz with its consequences. Controversies yet to be settled include how to address the use of AI in academic publishing, education and medicine, among others.&lt;span&gt;&lt;sup&gt;1-3&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/span&gt; An analysis of public perspectives on comfortability with AI in healthcare, drawn from social media content, found drastic heterogeneity.&lt;span&gt;&lt;sup&gt;4&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/span&gt; Results from a recent Pew survey suggest that higher academic level and experience with AI increases the likelihood of having confidence in AI's ability to enhance medical care.&lt;span&gt;&lt;sup&gt;5&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/span&gt; Nonetheless, natural language processing has already begun its infusion into the medical field with use cases including electrocardiogram interpretation and white blood cell count differentials.&lt;span&gt;&lt;sup&gt;6&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Urology is no exception in this regard—embracing the benefits of AI by exploring the utility of agents (i.e., text/voice/video chatbots) and evaluating surgical skill.&lt;span&gt;&lt;sup&gt;7, 8&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/span&gt; Some products have already resulted in the United States Food and Drug Administration approval, such as one that assists in localizing prostate tumour volume on magnetic resonance imaging and another that diagnoses prostate cancer on histopathology.&lt;span&gt;&lt;sup&gt;9, 10&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;As AI is increasingly adopted in everyday urology practice, to improve efficiency and quality of care, it is imperative that we consider the looming ethical ramifications proactively. A recent review presented by Dr. Hung et al. has illuminated some of these challenges, stirred conversation and presented possible policy-level solutions.&lt;span&gt;&lt;sup&gt;11&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/span&gt; Nevertheless, urologists have still yet to address several other legal and ethical challenges looming in generative AI model development. This editorial seeks to expand the scope of conversation encompassing necessary considerations for adopting AI in urology.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Three important issues to consider include the agency of patients and their data, ownership over the models themselves and the potential competition these models may add in the marketplace. Healthcare institutions are charged with being ethical stewards of patient data. This paternal identity may engender a sense of entitlement over the data, and institutions may act as though they own patient data and use that argument in negotiations; however, these data cannot be legally copyrighted. Second, healthcare systems and AI companies are competing and collaborating in this emerging space. Both may be entitled to the products they deve","PeriodicalId":72420,"journal":{"name":"BJUI compass","volume":"5 12","pages":"1246-1248"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2024-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11685166/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142916401","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A sustainable and expedited ‘One-Stop’ prostate cancer diagnostic pathway to reduce environmental impact and enhance accessibility 可持续和快速的“一站式”前列腺癌诊断途径,以减少对环境的影响并提高可及性。
IF 1.6 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Pub Date : 2024-10-23 DOI: 10.1002/bco2.447
Lorenzo Storino Ramacciotti, Masatomo Kaneko, Severin Rodler, Muneeb Mohideen, Jie Cai, Gangning Liang, Manju Aron, Michelle Hopstone, Mariana C. Stern, Giovanni E. Cacciamani, Inderbir Gill, Andre Luis Abreu

Objective

To assess the carbon footprint, accessibility, and diagnostic performance of an expedited ‘One-Stop’ prostate cancer (PCa) diagnostic pathway.

Materials and methods

A total of 1083 consecutive patients undergoing magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) followed by transrectal ultrasound fusion-guided prostate biopsy (PBx) were identified from a prospective database. The patients were divided according to the diagnostic pathway: One-Stop, with MRI and same-day PBx (3 hours apart), or Standard, with MRI followed by a second visit for PBx. Socioeconomic status was evaluated by the Distressed Communities Index (DCI) and the carbon footprint by the United States (U.S.) Environmental Protection Agency Greenhouse Gases Equivalencies Calculator.

Results

Overall, 260 patients underwent the One-Stop and 823 the Standard pathway. The One-Stop patients lived farther from the hospital (163 vs. 23 km; p < 0.001), had lower socioeconomic status with DCI scores of 49 versus 30 (p < 0.001), and were more likely to be Latinos (21% vs. 13%, p < 0.001) compared to the Standard patients, respectively. The One-Stop saved 69 575 km in round trips, over 16 tons of travel-related CO2 emissions, and $8214 U.S. dollars. For patients with Prostate Imaging Reporting & Data System (PIRADS) 3–5, the clinically significant PCa detection (53% vs. 50%, p = 0.55) was similar for the One-Stop and Standard pathways, respectively.

Conclusions

The One-Stop PCa diagnostic pathway reduces carbon footprint, distance travelled, and patient-level cost while maintaining clinical outcomes comparable to the Standard pathway. It facilitates access to tertiary-level care for minorities and underserved populations.

目的:评估快速“一站式”前列腺癌(PCa)诊断途径的碳足迹、可及性和诊断性能。材料和方法:从前瞻性数据库中确定1083例连续接受磁共振成像(MRI)和经直肠超声融合引导前列腺活检(PBx)的患者。根据诊断途径对患者进行分组:一站式,MRI和当日PBx(间隔3小时),或标准,MRI后第二次就诊PBx。社会经济地位通过贫困社区指数(DCI)和美国的碳足迹来评估。环境保护署温室气体当量计算器。结果:总体而言,260名患者接受了一站式途径,823名患者接受了标准途径。一站式就诊患者居住距离医院较远(163对23 km;二氧化碳排放量,以及8214美元。对于使用前列腺成像报告和数据系统(PIRADS) 3-5的患者,一站式和标准途径的临床显著性前列腺癌检出率(53% vs. 50%, p = 0.55)相似。结论:一站式PCa诊断途径减少了碳足迹、路程和患者层面的成本,同时保持了与标准途径相当的临床结果。它为少数民族和服务不足人口获得三级保健提供便利。
{"title":"A sustainable and expedited ‘One-Stop’ prostate cancer diagnostic pathway to reduce environmental impact and enhance accessibility","authors":"Lorenzo Storino Ramacciotti,&nbsp;Masatomo Kaneko,&nbsp;Severin Rodler,&nbsp;Muneeb Mohideen,&nbsp;Jie Cai,&nbsp;Gangning Liang,&nbsp;Manju Aron,&nbsp;Michelle Hopstone,&nbsp;Mariana C. Stern,&nbsp;Giovanni E. Cacciamani,&nbsp;Inderbir Gill,&nbsp;Andre Luis Abreu","doi":"10.1002/bco2.447","DOIUrl":"10.1002/bco2.447","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Objective</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>To assess the carbon footprint, accessibility, and diagnostic performance of an expedited ‘One-Stop’ prostate cancer (PCa) diagnostic pathway.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Materials and methods</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>A total of 1083 consecutive patients undergoing magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) followed by transrectal ultrasound fusion-guided prostate biopsy (PBx) were identified from a prospective database. The patients were divided according to the diagnostic pathway: One-Stop, with MRI and same-day PBx (3 hours apart), or Standard, with MRI followed by a second visit for PBx. Socioeconomic status was evaluated by the Distressed Communities Index (DCI) and the carbon footprint by the United States (U.S.) Environmental Protection Agency Greenhouse Gases Equivalencies Calculator.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Results</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Overall, 260 patients underwent the One-Stop and 823 the Standard pathway. The One-Stop patients lived farther from the hospital (163 vs. 23 km; <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001), had lower socioeconomic status with DCI scores of 49 versus 30 (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001), and were more likely to be Latinos (21% vs. 13%, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001) compared to the Standard patients, respectively. The One-Stop saved 69 575 km in round trips, over 16 tons of travel-related CO<sub>2</sub> emissions, and $8214 U.S. dollars. For patients with Prostate Imaging Reporting &amp; Data System (PIRADS) 3–5, the clinically significant PCa detection (53% vs. 50%, <i>p</i> = 0.55) was similar for the One-Stop and Standard pathways, respectively.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Conclusions</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>The One-Stop PCa diagnostic pathway reduces carbon footprint, distance travelled, and patient-level cost while maintaining clinical outcomes comparable to the Standard pathway. It facilitates access to tertiary-level care for minorities and underserved populations.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":72420,"journal":{"name":"BJUI compass","volume":"5 12","pages":"1278-1287"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2024-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11685178/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142916391","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Sequencing the Barcelona-MRI predictive model and Proclarix for improving the uncertain PI-RADS 3 测序Barcelona-MRI预测模型和Proclarix改善不确定PI-RADS 3。
IF 1.6 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Pub Date : 2024-10-22 DOI: 10.1002/bco2.448
Juan Morote, Ana Celma, Olga Méndez, Enrique Trilla
<p>Risk-stratified screening of prostate cancer (PCa) is currently recommended by the European Union (EU). Serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing is used to identify men suspected of having PCa, while magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is used to select candidates for prostate biopsy.<span><sup>1</sup></span> Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) is a score used to identify lesions suspected of having significant PCa (sPCa) on MRI. Prostate biopsies are typically avoided in men with PI-RADS lesions 1 and 2 (negative MRI), as their negative predictive value reaches 97%. Prostate biopsy is recommended in men with PI-RADS 3 to 5, with PI-RADS 3 being the most uncertain scenario,<span><sup>2</sup></span> as its positive predictive value for sPCa is between 16% and 18% with an overall 95% confidence interval (CI) between 13% and 27%.<span><sup>3, 4</sup></span> To improve the selection of candidates for prostate biopsy in uncertain scenarios, the use of PSA density (PSAD), appropriate predictive models (PMs) and modern tumour markers is recommended.<span><sup>5</sup></span></p><p>The European Association of Urology (EAU) currently recommends designing useful pathways that sequence stratifications based on appropriate PMs for men suspected of having PCa before and after MRI, with the objective of improving the efficacy of PCa screening by reducing MRI demand, prostate biopsies and the over-detection of insignificant PCa (iPCa).<span><sup>1</sup></span> The Barcelona (BCN) risk-organized model, which stratifies men suspected of having PCa through the BCN-PMs one (before MRI) and two (after MRI), has enhanced of the efficacy of detecting sPCa.<span><sup>6, 7</sup></span> The BCN-MRI PM has exhibited higher efficacy than PSAD for selecting men for prostate biopsy, especially in those with PI-RADS 3.<span><sup>8</sup></span> On the other hand, Proclarix, a new tumour marker that combine serum measurements of thrombospondin, cathepsin and percent free PSA, along with age, has shown good performance for detecting sPCa improving on that observed with PSAD and the Rotterdam-MRI PM. Proclarix has been able to achieve a 100% sensitivity for sPCa within men with PI-RADS 3.<span><sup>8</sup></span></p><p>Since the BCN-MRI PM and Proclarix have shown individually good performances for selecting candidates for prostate biopsy in men with PI-RADS 3, we aim to demonstrate if their sequential use improves the selection of candidates for prostate biopsy.</p><p>We have conducted a head-to head analysis of the BCN-MRI PM and Proclarix in 169 men with serum PSA level above 3 ng/mL and/or suspicious digital rectal examination (DRE), and PI-RADS v.2 score 3, consecutively referred from the opportunistic sPCa screening programme of Catalonia, Spain, between January 2018 and March 2019 at one academic institution. All participants underwent 2- to 4-core transrectal MRI-ultrasound fusion targeted biopsies and 12-core systematic biopsies. Blood was obtained j
{"title":"Sequencing the Barcelona-MRI predictive model and Proclarix for improving the uncertain PI-RADS 3","authors":"Juan Morote,&nbsp;Ana Celma,&nbsp;Olga Méndez,&nbsp;Enrique Trilla","doi":"10.1002/bco2.448","DOIUrl":"10.1002/bco2.448","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;Risk-stratified screening of prostate cancer (PCa) is currently recommended by the European Union (EU). Serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing is used to identify men suspected of having PCa, while magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is used to select candidates for prostate biopsy.&lt;span&gt;&lt;sup&gt;1&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/span&gt; Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) is a score used to identify lesions suspected of having significant PCa (sPCa) on MRI. Prostate biopsies are typically avoided in men with PI-RADS lesions 1 and 2 (negative MRI), as their negative predictive value reaches 97%. Prostate biopsy is recommended in men with PI-RADS 3 to 5, with PI-RADS 3 being the most uncertain scenario,&lt;span&gt;&lt;sup&gt;2&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/span&gt; as its positive predictive value for sPCa is between 16% and 18% with an overall 95% confidence interval (CI) between 13% and 27%.&lt;span&gt;&lt;sup&gt;3, 4&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/span&gt; To improve the selection of candidates for prostate biopsy in uncertain scenarios, the use of PSA density (PSAD), appropriate predictive models (PMs) and modern tumour markers is recommended.&lt;span&gt;&lt;sup&gt;5&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The European Association of Urology (EAU) currently recommends designing useful pathways that sequence stratifications based on appropriate PMs for men suspected of having PCa before and after MRI, with the objective of improving the efficacy of PCa screening by reducing MRI demand, prostate biopsies and the over-detection of insignificant PCa (iPCa).&lt;span&gt;&lt;sup&gt;1&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/span&gt; The Barcelona (BCN) risk-organized model, which stratifies men suspected of having PCa through the BCN-PMs one (before MRI) and two (after MRI), has enhanced of the efficacy of detecting sPCa.&lt;span&gt;&lt;sup&gt;6, 7&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/span&gt; The BCN-MRI PM has exhibited higher efficacy than PSAD for selecting men for prostate biopsy, especially in those with PI-RADS 3.&lt;span&gt;&lt;sup&gt;8&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/span&gt; On the other hand, Proclarix, a new tumour marker that combine serum measurements of thrombospondin, cathepsin and percent free PSA, along with age, has shown good performance for detecting sPCa improving on that observed with PSAD and the Rotterdam-MRI PM. Proclarix has been able to achieve a 100% sensitivity for sPCa within men with PI-RADS 3.&lt;span&gt;&lt;sup&gt;8&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Since the BCN-MRI PM and Proclarix have shown individually good performances for selecting candidates for prostate biopsy in men with PI-RADS 3, we aim to demonstrate if their sequential use improves the selection of candidates for prostate biopsy.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;We have conducted a head-to head analysis of the BCN-MRI PM and Proclarix in 169 men with serum PSA level above 3 ng/mL and/or suspicious digital rectal examination (DRE), and PI-RADS v.2 score 3, consecutively referred from the opportunistic sPCa screening programme of Catalonia, Spain, between January 2018 and March 2019 at one academic institution. All participants underwent 2- to 4-core transrectal MRI-ultrasound fusion targeted biopsies and 12-core systematic biopsies. Blood was obtained j","PeriodicalId":72420,"journal":{"name":"BJUI compass","volume":"5 12","pages":"1252-1254"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2024-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11685173/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142916412","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Early oncological outcomes of delayed radical prostatectomy: A prospective, international, follow-up analysis of the COVIDSurg-Cancer study 延迟根治性前列腺切除术的早期肿瘤预后:一项前瞻性,国际,covid -外科-癌症研究的随访分析。
IF 1.6 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Pub Date : 2024-10-17 DOI: 10.1002/bco2.433
Arjun Nathan, Chuanyu Gao, Alexander Light, Cameron Alexander, Vinson Chan, Kevin Gallagher, Sinan Khadhouri, Kevin G. Byrnes, Michael Ng, Michael Walters, Terry Hughes, Rita J. Perry, Kelvin Okoth, Laura Magill, Thomas Pinkney, Yuhao Zhang, James Blackmur, Eric Etchill, Stanley Tang, Damián García Escudero, Alan McNeill, Krishna Narahari, Grant D. Stewart, Veeru Kasivisvanathan, COVIDSurg Collaborative

Objectives

The objective of this study is to compare the early oncological outcomes of delayed (>90 days) versus scheduled (≤90 days) radical prostatectomy (RP).

Patients and methods

Patients with prostate cancer due to undergo surgery between March 2020 and June 2020 who were enrolled in the COVIDSurg-Cancer international, observational study were prospectively followed up for 1 year. Time to surgery was defined as the difference between the operation date and the multi-disciplinary team decision to offer surgery. The primary outcome was the positive surgical margin (PSM) rate. Biochemical recurrence (BCR), upgradation and upstaging were secondary oncological outcomes. The Independent t-test and Mann Whitney U test were used to compare means between groups and regression models and were used to investigate factors associated with the primary outcome.

Results

Four hundred seventy-six (78.7%) patients underwent RP from 605 that were eligible. Three hundred seven (64.5%) patients underwent scheduled RP, and 169 (35.5%) underwent delayed RP. A small proportion of men (n = 35, 6.8%) did not undergo RP within the 1-year follow-up period. More men with high-risk disease (72.8%) underwent scheduled RP compared to men with intermediate-risk disease (60.2%) (p < 0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in the PSM rate between the two groups (p = 0.512). Delay in surgery was not associated with an increased PSM or BCR on univariable or multivariable analyses. There was statistically significantly greater upstaging (p < 0.05) in the delayed group but no difference in upgradation.

Conclusion

High-risk men were prioritised for surgery during the COVID-19 pandemic. Our prospective data support previous retrospective, cancer-registry evidence suggesting no adverse oncological impact after delaying RP across all risk groups. Our study is limited by the short follow-up period, and therefore, longer term conclusions cannot be drawn.

目的:本研究的目的是比较延迟(≤90天)和计划(≤90天)根治性前列腺切除术(RP)的早期肿瘤预后。患者和方法:纳入covid - surgical - cancer国际观察性研究的2020年3月至2020年6月期间接受手术的前列腺癌患者,前瞻性随访1年。手术时间定义为手术日期与多学科团队决定提供手术之间的差异。主要结果为手术切缘阳性(PSM)率。生化复发(BCR)、升级和上位是次要的肿瘤预后。使用独立t检验和Mann Whitney U检验比较组间均值和回归模型,并用于调查与主要结局相关的因素。结果:605例患者中有476例(78.7%)接受了RP。397例(64.5%)患者接受了预定RP, 169例(35.5%)患者接受了延迟RP。一小部分男性(n = 35, 6.8%)在1年随访期间未接受RP。与中危男性(60.2%)相比,高危男性(72.8%)接受了计划RP (p = 0.512)。单变量或多变量分析显示,延迟手术与PSM或BCR的增加无关。结论:在COVID-19大流行期间,高危男性优先接受手术治疗。我们的前瞻性数据支持之前的回顾性癌症登记证据,表明在所有风险组中延迟RP后没有不良的肿瘤影响。本研究受限于随访时间较短,因此无法得出较长期的结论。
{"title":"Early oncological outcomes of delayed radical prostatectomy: A prospective, international, follow-up analysis of the COVIDSurg-Cancer study","authors":"Arjun Nathan,&nbsp;Chuanyu Gao,&nbsp;Alexander Light,&nbsp;Cameron Alexander,&nbsp;Vinson Chan,&nbsp;Kevin Gallagher,&nbsp;Sinan Khadhouri,&nbsp;Kevin G. Byrnes,&nbsp;Michael Ng,&nbsp;Michael Walters,&nbsp;Terry Hughes,&nbsp;Rita J. Perry,&nbsp;Kelvin Okoth,&nbsp;Laura Magill,&nbsp;Thomas Pinkney,&nbsp;Yuhao Zhang,&nbsp;James Blackmur,&nbsp;Eric Etchill,&nbsp;Stanley Tang,&nbsp;Damián García Escudero,&nbsp;Alan McNeill,&nbsp;Krishna Narahari,&nbsp;Grant D. Stewart,&nbsp;Veeru Kasivisvanathan,&nbsp;COVIDSurg Collaborative","doi":"10.1002/bco2.433","DOIUrl":"10.1002/bco2.433","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Objectives</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>The objective of this study is to compare the early oncological outcomes of delayed (&gt;90 days) versus scheduled (≤90 days) radical prostatectomy (RP).</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Patients and methods</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Patients with prostate cancer due to undergo surgery between March 2020 and June 2020 who were enrolled in the COVIDSurg-Cancer international, observational study were prospectively followed up for 1 year. Time to surgery was defined as the difference between the operation date and the multi-disciplinary team decision to offer surgery. The primary outcome was the positive surgical margin (PSM) rate. Biochemical recurrence (BCR), upgradation and upstaging were secondary oncological outcomes. The Independent <i>t</i>-test and Mann Whitney <i>U</i> test were used to compare means between groups and regression models and were used to investigate factors associated with the primary outcome.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Results</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Four hundred seventy-six (78.7%) patients underwent RP from 605 that were eligible. Three hundred seven (64.5%) patients underwent scheduled RP, and 169 (35.5%) underwent delayed RP. A small proportion of men (<i>n</i> = 35, 6.8%) did not undergo RP within the 1-year follow-up period. More men with high-risk disease (72.8%) underwent scheduled RP compared to men with intermediate-risk disease (60.2%) (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in the PSM rate between the two groups (<i>p</i> = 0.512). Delay in surgery was not associated with an increased PSM or BCR on univariable or multivariable analyses. There was statistically significantly greater upstaging (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.05) in the delayed group but no difference in upgradation.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Conclusion</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>High-risk men were prioritised for surgery during the COVID-19 pandemic. Our prospective data support previous retrospective, cancer-registry evidence suggesting no adverse oncological impact after delaying RP across all risk groups. Our study is limited by the short follow-up period, and therefore, longer term conclusions cannot be drawn.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":72420,"journal":{"name":"BJUI compass","volume":"5 12","pages":"1314-1323"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2024-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11685180/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142916398","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
BJUI compass
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1