Pub Date : 2025-08-01DOI: 10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-24-0514
Laura A Smith, Dalton M Craven, Alyssa N Ho, Elaine M Glenny, Erika T Rezeli, Meredith S Carson, Evan M Paules, Magdalena Fay, Alyssa J Cozzo, Stephen D Hursting, Michael F Coleman
Advanced age and obesity are major risk factors for breast cancer progression, including triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). In this study, we interrogated (i) whether these factors interact to promote TNBC progression and (ii) whether weight loss mitigates the separate and combined effects of aging and obesity on TNBC. We demonstrate that aging and diet-induced obesity interact to promote TNBC growth in mice. Transcriptomic analysis revealed the suppression of antitumor immunity in tumors from aged and/or obese mice. Weight loss via intermittent calorie restriction reduced tumor growth and restored immune-related gene signatures to reverse the protumor effects of aging and/or obesity. Using publicly available genomic datasets from murine studies of obesity, weight loss, and TNBC, we identified a consensus transcriptomic signature of obesity-driven immunosuppression that predicted the survival of patients with breast cancer. This consensus signature was also suppressed by aging, obesity, and their combination. Intermittent calorie restriction reversed the effects of aging and/or obesity on the consensus signature. We conclude that aging and obesity interact to limit antitumor immunity and enhance TNBC progression and that these adverse effects can be disrupted by weight loss.
Prevention relevance: Advanced age and obesity are important risk factors for the development and progression of breast cancers, including TNBC. We demonstrate that the suppression of signatures of antitumor immunity is a common feature of accelerated tumor progression in TNBC. We show that weight loss achieved through calorie restriction can restore such markers. See related Spotlight, p. 437.
{"title":"Weight Loss Reverses the Effects of Aging and Obesity on Mammary Tumor Immunosuppression and Progression.","authors":"Laura A Smith, Dalton M Craven, Alyssa N Ho, Elaine M Glenny, Erika T Rezeli, Meredith S Carson, Evan M Paules, Magdalena Fay, Alyssa J Cozzo, Stephen D Hursting, Michael F Coleman","doi":"10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-24-0514","DOIUrl":"10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-24-0514","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Advanced age and obesity are major risk factors for breast cancer progression, including triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). In this study, we interrogated (i) whether these factors interact to promote TNBC progression and (ii) whether weight loss mitigates the separate and combined effects of aging and obesity on TNBC. We demonstrate that aging and diet-induced obesity interact to promote TNBC growth in mice. Transcriptomic analysis revealed the suppression of antitumor immunity in tumors from aged and/or obese mice. Weight loss via intermittent calorie restriction reduced tumor growth and restored immune-related gene signatures to reverse the protumor effects of aging and/or obesity. Using publicly available genomic datasets from murine studies of obesity, weight loss, and TNBC, we identified a consensus transcriptomic signature of obesity-driven immunosuppression that predicted the survival of patients with breast cancer. This consensus signature was also suppressed by aging, obesity, and their combination. Intermittent calorie restriction reversed the effects of aging and/or obesity on the consensus signature. We conclude that aging and obesity interact to limit antitumor immunity and enhance TNBC progression and that these adverse effects can be disrupted by weight loss.</p><p><strong>Prevention relevance: </strong>Advanced age and obesity are important risk factors for the development and progression of breast cancers, including TNBC. We demonstrate that the suppression of signatures of antitumor immunity is a common feature of accelerated tumor progression in TNBC. We show that weight loss achieved through calorie restriction can restore such markers. See related Spotlight, p. 437.</p>","PeriodicalId":72514,"journal":{"name":"Cancer prevention research (Philadelphia, Pa.)","volume":" ","pages":"453-463"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12316554/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144036733","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Colorectal cancer (CRC) incidence is rising in Korea, emphasizing the need to identify its risk factors. Serum lipids may influence CRC risk, but evidence is conflicting. We examined the associations between serum lipids and CRC risk in Koreans. Using data from Korean Genome and Epidemiology Study Health Examinee study, we assessed serum low-density lipoproteins (LDL), high-density lipoproteins (HDL), triglycerides (TG) and total cholesterol (TC) among those who did not use lipid-lowering drugs. Dyslipidemia and its subcategories were defined using established clinical thresholds. Cancer cases were identified via the national cancer registry. Associations between lipids and cancers were evaluated using Cox regression. Subgroup analyses were conducted by sex, age, diabetes, and prior screening experience, along with sensitivity analyses based on follow-up duration. During a median follow-up of 9.1-years, 821 new CRC cases occurred among 111,330 participants aged 40-69 years (38,455 men and 72,875 women). For CRC, elevated TG (Q4 vs. Q1 HR 1.32, 95% CI: 1.07-1.62; P-trend = 0.02) and TC (Q4 vs. Q1 HR 1.22, 95% CI: 1.00-1.51) increased risk. For colon cancer, high TG increased risk (Q4 vs. Q1 HR 1.42, 95% CI: 1.08-1.86, P-trend=0.01). Those with hyper-triglyceridemia, compared those without, showed increased risk (HR 1.42, 95% CI: 1.07-1.87) for rectal cancer, whereas other lipids showed no significant associations. Similar but attenuated results were found in the subgroup analyses among participants aged ≥50 years. TG was associated with colorectal, colon, and rectal cancer in Koreans. Findings suggest that lipid levels may be relevant to CRC prevention strategies.
结直肠癌(CRC)在韩国的发病率正在上升,这强调了确定其危险因素的必要性。血脂可能影响结直肠癌风险,但证据是相互矛盾的。我们研究了韩国人血脂与结直肠癌风险之间的关系。利用韩国基因组与流行病学研究健康受试者研究的数据,我们评估了未使用降脂药物的受试者血清低密度脂蛋白(LDL)、高密度脂蛋白(HDL)、甘油三酯(TG)和总胆固醇(TC)。血脂异常及其亚类别使用既定的临床阈值进行定义。癌症病例是通过国家癌症登记处确定的。使用Cox回归评估脂质与癌症之间的关联。亚组分析按性别、年龄、糖尿病和既往筛查经验进行,并根据随访时间进行敏感性分析。在中位随访9.1年期间,在111,330名年龄在40-69岁之间的参与者(38,455名男性和72,875名女性)中发生了821例新的CRC病例。对于结直肠癌,TG升高(Q4 vs Q1 HR 1.32, 95% CI: 1.07-1.62;P-trend = 0.02)和TC (Q4 vs. Q1 HR 1.22, 95% CI: 1.00-1.51)增加了风险。对于结肠癌,高TG增加风险(Q4 vs Q1 HR 1.42, 95% CI: 1.08-1.86, P-trend=0.01)。与没有高甘油三酯血症的人相比,高甘油三酯血症的人患直肠癌的风险增加(HR 1.42, 95% CI: 1.07-1.87),而其他脂质没有明显的关联。在年龄≥50岁的参与者的亚组分析中发现了类似但减弱的结果。甘油三酯与韩国人的大肠癌、结肠癌和直肠癌有关。研究结果表明,脂质水平可能与结直肠癌预防策略有关。
{"title":"Association of Elevated Serum Triglycerides with Colorectal Cancer Risk: Findings from a Large-Scale Prospective Cohort of Korean Adults.","authors":"Sukhong Min, Hyobin Lee, Sinyoung Cho, Seung-Yong Jeong, Aesun Shin, Daehee Kang","doi":"10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-25-0058","DOIUrl":"10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-25-0058","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Colorectal cancer (CRC) incidence is rising in Korea, emphasizing the need to identify its risk factors. Serum lipids may influence CRC risk, but evidence is conflicting. We examined the associations between serum lipids and CRC risk in Koreans. Using data from Korean Genome and Epidemiology Study Health Examinee study, we assessed serum low-density lipoproteins (LDL), high-density lipoproteins (HDL), triglycerides (TG) and total cholesterol (TC) among those who did not use lipid-lowering drugs. Dyslipidemia and its subcategories were defined using established clinical thresholds. Cancer cases were identified via the national cancer registry. Associations between lipids and cancers were evaluated using Cox regression. Subgroup analyses were conducted by sex, age, diabetes, and prior screening experience, along with sensitivity analyses based on follow-up duration. During a median follow-up of 9.1-years, 821 new CRC cases occurred among 111,330 participants aged 40-69 years (38,455 men and 72,875 women). For CRC, elevated TG (Q4 vs. Q1 HR 1.32, 95% CI: 1.07-1.62; P-trend = 0.02) and TC (Q4 vs. Q1 HR 1.22, 95% CI: 1.00-1.51) increased risk. For colon cancer, high TG increased risk (Q4 vs. Q1 HR 1.42, 95% CI: 1.08-1.86, P-trend=0.01). Those with hyper-triglyceridemia, compared those without, showed increased risk (HR 1.42, 95% CI: 1.07-1.87) for rectal cancer, whereas other lipids showed no significant associations. Similar but attenuated results were found in the subgroup analyses among participants aged ≥50 years. TG was associated with colorectal, colon, and rectal cancer in Koreans. Findings suggest that lipid levels may be relevant to CRC prevention strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":72514,"journal":{"name":"Cancer prevention research (Philadelphia, Pa.)","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2025-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144735806","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-07-01DOI: 10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-24-0348
Zsolt Nagykaldi, Mark Doescher, Dorothy A Rhoades, Kathleen Dwyer, Ann Chou, Michele Gibson
The Tribally Engaged Approaches to Lung Cancer Screening study aimed to codesign and test a community-based lung cancer screening (LCS) program within a large, tribally operated health system. In 2020 to 2021, we conducted a pre-post quasi-experimental pilot implementation study of a tailored and comprehensive LCS program in two Choctaw Nation of Oklahoma primary care clinics in rural Oklahoma. The program included screening quality assessment, academic detailing, practice facilitation, health system enhancements, technology support, centralized LCS coordination, and community outreach. Eligibility for LCS was based on the 2013 U.S. Preventive Services Task Force guidelines. Participants completed pre- and post-intervention surveys on their knowledge, attitudes, and experiences regarding LCS. All participant charts were extracted to determine LCS completion. Postimplementation semi-structured interviews of patients and clinicians were conducted, and practice facilitator notes were analyzed. Participants (N = 57) averaged 67 years, and 66% were current smokers. The proportion of participants who were up-to-date with LCS increased from 39% to 58% (P < 0.01). About 18% of patients reported improvement in general care choice and treatment discussions with their doctor, and about 40% reported an improvement in their awareness or understanding of lung cancer and receipt of LCS. We also identified several key facilitators and barriers to LCS implementation at the practice and health system levels. LCS acceptance and uptake improved significantly in this community-engaged pilot intervention which informed a subsequent cluster-randomized trial. Comprehensive and community-engaged LCS programs may have the potential to improve the delivery of LCS in underserved community settings.
Prevention relevance: Our community-engaged, multicomponent, and multilevel pilot implementation study significantly improved lung cancer screening rates in a rural, tribal health system. A key feature of this pilot study was a centralized screening coordination service supported by a population screening registry. We believe that our study is replicable in other settings. See related Spotlight, p. 381.
部落参与的肺癌筛查方法(TEALS)研究旨在共同设计和测试一个大型部落运营的卫生系统中基于社区的肺癌筛查(LCS)项目。2020-2021年,我们在俄克拉何马州农村的两个乔克托族(Choctaw Nation of Oklahoma, CNO)初级保健诊所进行了一项量身定制的综合LCS计划的准实验前试点实施研究。该计划包括筛查质量评估、学术细节、实践促进、卫生系统改进、技术支持、集中LCS协调和社区外展。LCS的资格是基于2013年美国预防服务工作组指南。参与者完成了干预前和干预后关于LCS的知识、态度和经验的调查。提取所有参与者的图表以确定LCS完成情况。实施后对患者和临床医生进行了半结构化访谈,并分析了实践促进者的笔记。参与者(N=57)平均年龄为67岁,其中66%为当前吸烟者。更新LCS的参与者比例从39%增加到58% (p
{"title":"Implementing a Tribally Engaged Lung Cancer Screening Pilot Program in Rural Oklahoma.","authors":"Zsolt Nagykaldi, Mark Doescher, Dorothy A Rhoades, Kathleen Dwyer, Ann Chou, Michele Gibson","doi":"10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-24-0348","DOIUrl":"10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-24-0348","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The Tribally Engaged Approaches to Lung Cancer Screening study aimed to codesign and test a community-based lung cancer screening (LCS) program within a large, tribally operated health system. In 2020 to 2021, we conducted a pre-post quasi-experimental pilot implementation study of a tailored and comprehensive LCS program in two Choctaw Nation of Oklahoma primary care clinics in rural Oklahoma. The program included screening quality assessment, academic detailing, practice facilitation, health system enhancements, technology support, centralized LCS coordination, and community outreach. Eligibility for LCS was based on the 2013 U.S. Preventive Services Task Force guidelines. Participants completed pre- and post-intervention surveys on their knowledge, attitudes, and experiences regarding LCS. All participant charts were extracted to determine LCS completion. Postimplementation semi-structured interviews of patients and clinicians were conducted, and practice facilitator notes were analyzed. Participants (N = 57) averaged 67 years, and 66% were current smokers. The proportion of participants who were up-to-date with LCS increased from 39% to 58% (P < 0.01). About 18% of patients reported improvement in general care choice and treatment discussions with their doctor, and about 40% reported an improvement in their awareness or understanding of lung cancer and receipt of LCS. We also identified several key facilitators and barriers to LCS implementation at the practice and health system levels. LCS acceptance and uptake improved significantly in this community-engaged pilot intervention which informed a subsequent cluster-randomized trial. Comprehensive and community-engaged LCS programs may have the potential to improve the delivery of LCS in underserved community settings.</p><p><strong>Prevention relevance: </strong>Our community-engaged, multicomponent, and multilevel pilot implementation study significantly improved lung cancer screening rates in a rural, tribal health system. A key feature of this pilot study was a centralized screening coordination service supported by a population screening registry. We believe that our study is replicable in other settings. See related Spotlight, p. 381.</p>","PeriodicalId":72514,"journal":{"name":"Cancer prevention research (Philadelphia, Pa.)","volume":" ","pages":"423-430"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12209819/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143525217","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-07-01DOI: 10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-25-0114
Abbie Begnaud, Frank G Ondrey
Cancer screening practices are amalgamated into the entire spectrum of cancer prevention efforts that range from primary prevention (e.g., avoiding tobacco and limiting sun exposure) to screening measures after risk assessment (mammography, colonoscopy, pap smears, etc.) and tertiary measures (e.g., lesion ablation after identification and cancer follow-up examinations for secondary primaries). Marginalized groups often have difficulty gaining access to screening, and improving screening rates is challenging. The Tribally Engaged Approaches to Lung Screening (TEALS) study for lung cancer screening in the American Indian/Alaska Native population in Oklahoma represents a comprehensive effort that has significantly improved lung cancer screening for high-risk individuals on the Choctaw Nation. See related article by Nagykaldi et al., p. 423.
{"title":"Evidence-Based Lung Cancer Screening in a Tailored Package.","authors":"Abbie Begnaud, Frank G Ondrey","doi":"10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-25-0114","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-25-0114","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Cancer screening practices are amalgamated into the entire spectrum of cancer prevention efforts that range from primary prevention (e.g., avoiding tobacco and limiting sun exposure) to screening measures after risk assessment (mammography, colonoscopy, pap smears, etc.) and tertiary measures (e.g., lesion ablation after identification and cancer follow-up examinations for secondary primaries). Marginalized groups often have difficulty gaining access to screening, and improving screening rates is challenging. The Tribally Engaged Approaches to Lung Screening (TEALS) study for lung cancer screening in the American Indian/Alaska Native population in Oklahoma represents a comprehensive effort that has significantly improved lung cancer screening for high-risk individuals on the Choctaw Nation. See related article by Nagykaldi et al., p. 423.</p>","PeriodicalId":72514,"journal":{"name":"Cancer prevention research (Philadelphia, Pa.)","volume":"18 7","pages":"381-382"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144531338","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-07-01DOI: 10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-24-0426
Mark E Sherman, Michael G Heckman, Christopher C DeStephano, Launia J White, Jennifer L St Sauver, Ruth M Pfeiffer
Historically, cancers diagnosed via the emergency department (ED) portend a poor prognosis. Recent data from the United States are sparse, and analyses of cancers detected in the years following ED visits are lacking. Thus, we analyzed data from nine rural U.S. Midwest counties included within the population-based Rochester Epidemiology Project (2015-2021). Participants without a history of cancer (N = 42,074) who did not receive ED care were matched 1:1 to ED participants on the date of ED visit, age, sex, race, ethnicity, and county of residence. Analyses were restricted to participants with records ≤2 years prior to ED or index visit and ≥30 days after. HRs and 95% confidence intervals (CI) comparing cancer incidence and deaths among ED and non-ED participants were estimated from Cox proportional hazards regression models, either unadjusted or adjusted for covariates. Cumulative cancer incidence curves accounting for competing risks of death and survival (all cause and cancer-specific) were estimated. The median follow-up was 6.3 years, with 2,719 (6.46%) cancers diagnosed among ED participants and 3,139 (7.46%) among non-ED participants. ED participants experienced lower cancer risk overall (HRAdjusted = 0.70; 95% CI, 0.66-0.74; P = 8.89 × 10-31), specifically for breast cancer, prostate cancer, melanoma, and secondary cancers. Cancer-specific mortality was higher among ED participants (HRAdjusted = 1.76; 95% CI, 1.49-2.08; P = 3.62 × 10-11). Compared with non-ED participants, ED participants experienced a lower incidence of cancer but higher overall cancer-specific mortality, suggesting that subsets of ED patients may benefit from postvisit preventive interventions.
Prevention relevance: This cohort analysis shows that cancer incidence over 6 years was lower among participants after an ED visit than among matched non-ED participants, whereas cancer-specific mortality was higher in the ED group (HRAdjusted = 1.76; 95% CI, 1.49-2.08; P = 3.62 × 10-11), suggesting the potential benefit of preventive interventions.
{"title":"Cancer Incidence and Survival after Emergency Department Care in the U.S. Midwest: An Opportunity for Cancer Interception.","authors":"Mark E Sherman, Michael G Heckman, Christopher C DeStephano, Launia J White, Jennifer L St Sauver, Ruth M Pfeiffer","doi":"10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-24-0426","DOIUrl":"10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-24-0426","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Historically, cancers diagnosed via the emergency department (ED) portend a poor prognosis. Recent data from the United States are sparse, and analyses of cancers detected in the years following ED visits are lacking. Thus, we analyzed data from nine rural U.S. Midwest counties included within the population-based Rochester Epidemiology Project (2015-2021). Participants without a history of cancer (N = 42,074) who did not receive ED care were matched 1:1 to ED participants on the date of ED visit, age, sex, race, ethnicity, and county of residence. Analyses were restricted to participants with records ≤2 years prior to ED or index visit and ≥30 days after. HRs and 95% confidence intervals (CI) comparing cancer incidence and deaths among ED and non-ED participants were estimated from Cox proportional hazards regression models, either unadjusted or adjusted for covariates. Cumulative cancer incidence curves accounting for competing risks of death and survival (all cause and cancer-specific) were estimated. The median follow-up was 6.3 years, with 2,719 (6.46%) cancers diagnosed among ED participants and 3,139 (7.46%) among non-ED participants. ED participants experienced lower cancer risk overall (HRAdjusted = 0.70; 95% CI, 0.66-0.74; P = 8.89 × 10-31), specifically for breast cancer, prostate cancer, melanoma, and secondary cancers. Cancer-specific mortality was higher among ED participants (HRAdjusted = 1.76; 95% CI, 1.49-2.08; P = 3.62 × 10-11). Compared with non-ED participants, ED participants experienced a lower incidence of cancer but higher overall cancer-specific mortality, suggesting that subsets of ED patients may benefit from postvisit preventive interventions.</p><p><strong>Prevention relevance: </strong>This cohort analysis shows that cancer incidence over 6 years was lower among participants after an ED visit than among matched non-ED participants, whereas cancer-specific mortality was higher in the ED group (HRAdjusted = 1.76; 95% CI, 1.49-2.08; P = 3.62 × 10-11), suggesting the potential benefit of preventive interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":72514,"journal":{"name":"Cancer prevention research (Philadelphia, Pa.)","volume":" ","pages":"413-421"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12213139/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143796436","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-07-01DOI: 10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-23-0461
Brandy M Heckman-Stoddard, Jill P Crandall, Sharon L Edelstein, Philip C Prorok, Dana Dabelea, Richard Hamman, Helen P Hazuda, Edward Horton, Mary A Hoskin, Marjorie Perloff, Anna Bowers, William C Knowler, Leslie G Ford, Marinella Temprosa
Meta-analyses have reported a decrease in overall cancer incidence of approximately 10% to 40% with metformin use among individuals with diabetes. Lifestyle change could potentially reduce cancer incidence. The objective was to determine whether metformin or intensive lifestyle (ILS) intervention reduces the risk of cancer among adults at high risk of diabetes. The Diabetes Prevention Program (1996-2001) randomized 3,234 participants to ILS, metformin (850 mg twice daily), or blinded placebo. During follow-up through the Diabetes Prevention Program Outcomes Study, all participants were offered a modified lifestyle intervention, and metformin continued in an open-label metformin group. Participants reported cancer cases annually. Medical records were adjudicated for all reported events. The primary endpoint was total cancer incidence, comparing metformin versus placebo, with ILS versus placebo as a secondary objective. After a median follow-up of 21 years, 546 participants (173 metformin, 182 ILS, and 191 placebo) were diagnosed with a first incident cancer. Incidence rates of cancer were 9.8, 10.5, and 10.8 per 1,000 person-years in metformin, ILS, and placebo, respectively, with a HR of 0.90 (95% confidence interval, 0.73-1.10) for metformin compared with placebo and 0.96 (95% confidence interval, 0.79-1.18) for ILS compared with placebo. There were no differences between any treatment groups for obesity-related cancer or in sex-specific analyses. Neither assignment to metformin nor ILS reduced cancer incidence among adults at high risk of diabetes. These results may be impacted by increased nonstudy metformin usage over time due to the development of diabetes and reduced intensity of the ILS intervention over time.
Prevention relevance: This study examines both metformin and ILS intervention as primary cancer prevention interventions in people at high risk for type 2 diabetes.
{"title":"Randomized Study of Metformin and Intensive Lifestyle Intervention on Cancer Incidence over 21 Years of Follow-up in the Diabetes Prevention Program.","authors":"Brandy M Heckman-Stoddard, Jill P Crandall, Sharon L Edelstein, Philip C Prorok, Dana Dabelea, Richard Hamman, Helen P Hazuda, Edward Horton, Mary A Hoskin, Marjorie Perloff, Anna Bowers, William C Knowler, Leslie G Ford, Marinella Temprosa","doi":"10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-23-0461","DOIUrl":"10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-23-0461","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Meta-analyses have reported a decrease in overall cancer incidence of approximately 10% to 40% with metformin use among individuals with diabetes. Lifestyle change could potentially reduce cancer incidence. The objective was to determine whether metformin or intensive lifestyle (ILS) intervention reduces the risk of cancer among adults at high risk of diabetes. The Diabetes Prevention Program (1996-2001) randomized 3,234 participants to ILS, metformin (850 mg twice daily), or blinded placebo. During follow-up through the Diabetes Prevention Program Outcomes Study, all participants were offered a modified lifestyle intervention, and metformin continued in an open-label metformin group. Participants reported cancer cases annually. Medical records were adjudicated for all reported events. The primary endpoint was total cancer incidence, comparing metformin versus placebo, with ILS versus placebo as a secondary objective. After a median follow-up of 21 years, 546 participants (173 metformin, 182 ILS, and 191 placebo) were diagnosed with a first incident cancer. Incidence rates of cancer were 9.8, 10.5, and 10.8 per 1,000 person-years in metformin, ILS, and placebo, respectively, with a HR of 0.90 (95% confidence interval, 0.73-1.10) for metformin compared with placebo and 0.96 (95% confidence interval, 0.79-1.18) for ILS compared with placebo. There were no differences between any treatment groups for obesity-related cancer or in sex-specific analyses. Neither assignment to metformin nor ILS reduced cancer incidence among adults at high risk of diabetes. These results may be impacted by increased nonstudy metformin usage over time due to the development of diabetes and reduced intensity of the ILS intervention over time.</p><p><strong>Prevention relevance: </strong>This study examines both metformin and ILS intervention as primary cancer prevention interventions in people at high risk for type 2 diabetes.</p>","PeriodicalId":72514,"journal":{"name":"Cancer prevention research (Philadelphia, Pa.)","volume":" ","pages":"401-411"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12213222/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144060319","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-07-01DOI: 10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-24-0501
Simona Herdenberg, Carl Wibom, Esmeralda J M Krop, Hilde Langseth, Roel Vermeulen, Sophia Harlid, Wendy Yi-Ying Wu, Florentin Späth
Multiple myeloma is preceded by monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS). Only a minority of patients with MGUS will develop multiple myeloma, but precise prediction of progression is impossible using routine clinical biomarkers. Changes in the levels of blood immune markers can help predict disease progression. Data remain inconsistent for some markers of interest such as monocyte chemotactic protein-3 (MCP-3), macrophage inflammatory protein-1 alpha (MIP-1α), fibroblast growth factor-2 (FGF-2), vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), fractalkine, and transforming growth factor-alpha (TGF-α). We aimed to investigate the associations between the prediagnostic serum levels of these candidate biomarkers and future multiple myeloma risk, as well as to assess marker changes over time. We performed a nested case-control study using prospective samples from the Janus Serum Bank in Norway to investigate associations between multiple myeloma risk and prediagnostic serum levels of MCP-3, MIP-1α, FGF-2, VEGF, fractalkine, and TGF-α. The study included 293 future multiple myeloma cases with serum samples collected 20 years (median) before multiple myeloma diagnosis and 293 matched cancer-free controls. Patients with multiple myeloma had an additional prediagnostic sample collected up to 42 years before diagnosis to identify marker changes over time. Markers with >60% detection rate (MIP-1α, VEGF, and TGF-α) were included in the statistical analysis. We observed no statistically significant associations between multiple myeloma risk and serum levels of MIP-1α, VEGF, or TGF-α in samples collected 20 years before diagnosis. However, TGF-α levels decreased significantly closer to the diagnosis in patients with multiple myeloma (P < 0.001). The decrease in TGF-α levels may reflect subtle microenvironmental changes related to multiple myeloma progression.
Prevention relevance: This study observed a decline in TGF-α serum levels closer to multiple myeloma diagnosis, which may aid in predicting multiple myeloma progression and early detection, although validation in other longitudinal cohorts is needed.
多发性骨髓瘤(MM)在发病前会出现意义未定的单克隆丙种球蛋白病(MGUS)。只有少数 MGUS 患者会发展为 MM,但使用常规临床生物标记物无法准确预测病情的发展。血液免疫标志物水平的变化有助于预测疾病的进展。一些相关标志物的数据仍不一致,如单核细胞趋化蛋白-3(MCP-3)、巨噬细胞炎症蛋白-1α(MIP-1α)、成纤维细胞生长因子-2(FGF-2)、血管内皮生长因子(VEGF)、分叉蛋白和转化生长因子-α(TGF-α)。我们的目的是研究这些候选生物标志物的诊断前血清水平与未来 MM 风险之间的关联,并评估标志物随时间的变化。我们利用挪威 Janus 血清库的前瞻性样本进行了一项巢式病例对照研究,以调查 MM 风险与诊断前血清中 MCP-3、MIP-1α、FGF-2、VEGF、fractalkine 和 TGF-α 水平之间的关联。这项研究包括 293 例未来的 MM 病例(在确诊 MM 前 20 年(中位数)采集的血清样本)和 293 例匹配的无癌症对照组。MM 患者在确诊前 42 年采集了一份额外的诊断前样本,以确定标记物随时间的变化。检出率大于 60% 的标记物(MIP-1α、血管内皮生长因子和 TGF-α)被纳入统计分析。在诊断前 20 年采集的样本中,我们没有观察到 MM 风险与血清中 MIP-1α、VEGF 或 TGF-α 水平之间有统计学意义的关联。然而,在 MM 患者中,TGF-α 水平在临近确诊时明显下降(p
{"title":"Prediagnostic Serum Immune Marker Levels and Multiple Myeloma: A Prospective Longitudinal Study Using Samples from the Janus Serum Bank in Norway.","authors":"Simona Herdenberg, Carl Wibom, Esmeralda J M Krop, Hilde Langseth, Roel Vermeulen, Sophia Harlid, Wendy Yi-Ying Wu, Florentin Späth","doi":"10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-24-0501","DOIUrl":"10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-24-0501","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Multiple myeloma is preceded by monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS). Only a minority of patients with MGUS will develop multiple myeloma, but precise prediction of progression is impossible using routine clinical biomarkers. Changes in the levels of blood immune markers can help predict disease progression. Data remain inconsistent for some markers of interest such as monocyte chemotactic protein-3 (MCP-3), macrophage inflammatory protein-1 alpha (MIP-1α), fibroblast growth factor-2 (FGF-2), vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), fractalkine, and transforming growth factor-alpha (TGF-α). We aimed to investigate the associations between the prediagnostic serum levels of these candidate biomarkers and future multiple myeloma risk, as well as to assess marker changes over time. We performed a nested case-control study using prospective samples from the Janus Serum Bank in Norway to investigate associations between multiple myeloma risk and prediagnostic serum levels of MCP-3, MIP-1α, FGF-2, VEGF, fractalkine, and TGF-α. The study included 293 future multiple myeloma cases with serum samples collected 20 years (median) before multiple myeloma diagnosis and 293 matched cancer-free controls. Patients with multiple myeloma had an additional prediagnostic sample collected up to 42 years before diagnosis to identify marker changes over time. Markers with >60% detection rate (MIP-1α, VEGF, and TGF-α) were included in the statistical analysis. We observed no statistically significant associations between multiple myeloma risk and serum levels of MIP-1α, VEGF, or TGF-α in samples collected 20 years before diagnosis. However, TGF-α levels decreased significantly closer to the diagnosis in patients with multiple myeloma (P < 0.001). The decrease in TGF-α levels may reflect subtle microenvironmental changes related to multiple myeloma progression.</p><p><strong>Prevention relevance: </strong>This study observed a decline in TGF-α serum levels closer to multiple myeloma diagnosis, which may aid in predicting multiple myeloma progression and early detection, although validation in other longitudinal cohorts is needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":72514,"journal":{"name":"Cancer prevention research (Philadelphia, Pa.)","volume":" ","pages":"383-391"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12209824/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143733473","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-07-01DOI: 10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-24-0474
Maria Grazia Tibiletti, Ileana Carnevali, Sofia Facchi, Valeria Pensotti, Giorgio Formenti, Nora Sahnane, Laura Libera, Susanna Ronchi, Sara Volorio, Marco Alessandro Pierotti, Stefano La Rosa, Fausto Sessa
Approximately half of high-grade ovarian cancers are characterized by genetic and epigenetic alterations in genes involved in homologous recombination repair (HRR), most commonly BRCA1 and BRCA2. HRR defects (HRD) identified by tests of genomic instability confer PARP inhibitor sensitivity in ovarian cancers. Commercial tests that combine tumor BRCA testing with a genomic instability score (HRD test) are available in clinical practice. We seek to determine the performance of three different HRD tests to improve therapy management and prevention of ovarian cancer. Tumor samples from 50 patients with high-grade ovarian cancers were investigated for tumoral BRCA status, genomic instability, and BRCA1 promoter methylation for treatment purposes. Patients with ovarian cancer that tested positive for BRCA variants and/or genomic instability defect were referred to the Cancer Genetics Service for germline testing. A positive HRD status was observed in 54% of cases, and pathogenic variants in BRCA genes were identified in 41% of cases presenting genomic instability. BRCA1 methylation assay revealed promoter hypermethylation in 20% of ovarian cancers that tested positive for HRD and negative for BRCA1/2 variants. Among 26 women referred to cancer genetic counseling, 10 carried germline variants in HRR genes. HRD status determined eligibility for PARP inhibitor treatment in all but two ovarian cancers. This study outlines that determining genomic instability helps identify inherited ovarian cancers. HRD testing, crucial for making high-grade ovarian cancer treatment choices, must be linked to an established path of cancer genetic counseling and management of individuals at high cancer risk.
Prevention relevance: Genomic instability status (HRD testing), which is essential for making therapy choices, is useful to identify inherited ovarian cancers. Identifying these families with high cancer risk is critical for implementing targeted cancer prevention strategies.
{"title":"From Therapy to Cancer Prevention Using HRD Testing on Patients with High-grade Ovarian Cancer.","authors":"Maria Grazia Tibiletti, Ileana Carnevali, Sofia Facchi, Valeria Pensotti, Giorgio Formenti, Nora Sahnane, Laura Libera, Susanna Ronchi, Sara Volorio, Marco Alessandro Pierotti, Stefano La Rosa, Fausto Sessa","doi":"10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-24-0474","DOIUrl":"10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-24-0474","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Approximately half of high-grade ovarian cancers are characterized by genetic and epigenetic alterations in genes involved in homologous recombination repair (HRR), most commonly BRCA1 and BRCA2. HRR defects (HRD) identified by tests of genomic instability confer PARP inhibitor sensitivity in ovarian cancers. Commercial tests that combine tumor BRCA testing with a genomic instability score (HRD test) are available in clinical practice. We seek to determine the performance of three different HRD tests to improve therapy management and prevention of ovarian cancer. Tumor samples from 50 patients with high-grade ovarian cancers were investigated for tumoral BRCA status, genomic instability, and BRCA1 promoter methylation for treatment purposes. Patients with ovarian cancer that tested positive for BRCA variants and/or genomic instability defect were referred to the Cancer Genetics Service for germline testing. A positive HRD status was observed in 54% of cases, and pathogenic variants in BRCA genes were identified in 41% of cases presenting genomic instability. BRCA1 methylation assay revealed promoter hypermethylation in 20% of ovarian cancers that tested positive for HRD and negative for BRCA1/2 variants. Among 26 women referred to cancer genetic counseling, 10 carried germline variants in HRR genes. HRD status determined eligibility for PARP inhibitor treatment in all but two ovarian cancers. This study outlines that determining genomic instability helps identify inherited ovarian cancers. HRD testing, crucial for making high-grade ovarian cancer treatment choices, must be linked to an established path of cancer genetic counseling and management of individuals at high cancer risk.</p><p><strong>Prevention relevance: </strong>Genomic instability status (HRD testing), which is essential for making therapy choices, is useful to identify inherited ovarian cancers. Identifying these families with high cancer risk is critical for implementing targeted cancer prevention strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":72514,"journal":{"name":"Cancer prevention research (Philadelphia, Pa.)","volume":" ","pages":"393-400"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144054331","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-06-02DOI: 10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-24-0168
Xiangzhu Zhu, Ruohui Chen, Reid M Ness, Rishi D Naik, Harvey J Murff, Heping Zhang, Yanfei Xu, Kelly A Benante, M Andrea Azcarate-Peril, Yinan Zheng, Jun Wang, Martha J Shrubsole, Timothy Su, Xinlei Mi, Masha Kocherginsky, Luz Maria Rodriguez, Gary Della'Zanna, Ellen Richmond, Lifang Hou, Seema A Khan, Qi Dai
Aspirin reduces colorectal cancer risk but has a potential for adverse effects. Recent preclinical data suggest that intermittent dosing of aspirin may minimize adverse effects while maintaining efficacy. We conducted a three-arm double-blind randomized placebo-controlled phase II trial. The primary objective of the study was to test for the equivalency of two aspirin schedules, i.e., the effects of daily aspirin 325 mg/day continuously (cont-ASA) for 12 weeks or intermittently and 3 weeks on/3 weeks off on biomarkers related to colorectal carcinogenesis in rectal mucosa. A placebo group enabled the estimation of spontaneous biomarker variation. Eighty-one participants were randomized, of whom forty-five were evaluable. For the primary endpoint of decrease in the Ki-67:BCL2-associated X ratio, we could not establish equivalence for the two treatment regimens and also found no significant difference between them. For the secondary endpoint, cont-ASA treatment was significantly more effective in reducing the Ki-67:terminal deoxyribonucleotidyl transferase-mediated dUTP nick end labeling ratio. Among exploratory endpoints, we found more reduction in epithelial COX-2 expression in the cont-ASA arm compared with the intermittent aspirin dosing arm. We did not observe significant differences in other secondary and exploratory endpoints. Intermittent aspirin dosing in 3-week cycles does not produce the same biologic effect as continuous dosing. Future studies should examine whether a 1-week on/1-week off schedule can maximize the efficacy and minimize the side effects. Prevention Relevance: In this three-arm double-blind randomized placebo-controlled phase II trial, we could not establish equivalence for daily aspirin 325 mg versus intermittent aspirin (3 weeks on/3 weeks off) on Ki-67:BCL2-associated X ratio. However, compared with intermittent aspirin administration, continuing aspirin was significantly more effective in reducing the Ki-67:terminal deoxyribonucleotidyl transferase-mediated dUTP nick end labeling ratio and COX-2 in rectal mucosa.
{"title":"Evaluating Intermittent Dosing of Aspirin for Colorectal Cancer Chemoprevention.","authors":"Xiangzhu Zhu, Ruohui Chen, Reid M Ness, Rishi D Naik, Harvey J Murff, Heping Zhang, Yanfei Xu, Kelly A Benante, M Andrea Azcarate-Peril, Yinan Zheng, Jun Wang, Martha J Shrubsole, Timothy Su, Xinlei Mi, Masha Kocherginsky, Luz Maria Rodriguez, Gary Della'Zanna, Ellen Richmond, Lifang Hou, Seema A Khan, Qi Dai","doi":"10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-24-0168","DOIUrl":"10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-24-0168","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Aspirin reduces colorectal cancer risk but has a potential for adverse effects. Recent preclinical data suggest that intermittent dosing of aspirin may minimize adverse effects while maintaining efficacy. We conducted a three-arm double-blind randomized placebo-controlled phase II trial. The primary objective of the study was to test for the equivalency of two aspirin schedules, i.e., the effects of daily aspirin 325 mg/day continuously (cont-ASA) for 12 weeks or intermittently and 3 weeks on/3 weeks off on biomarkers related to colorectal carcinogenesis in rectal mucosa. A placebo group enabled the estimation of spontaneous biomarker variation. Eighty-one participants were randomized, of whom forty-five were evaluable. For the primary endpoint of decrease in the Ki-67:BCL2-associated X ratio, we could not establish equivalence for the two treatment regimens and also found no significant difference between them. For the secondary endpoint, cont-ASA treatment was significantly more effective in reducing the Ki-67:terminal deoxyribonucleotidyl transferase-mediated dUTP nick end labeling ratio. Among exploratory endpoints, we found more reduction in epithelial COX-2 expression in the cont-ASA arm compared with the intermittent aspirin dosing arm. We did not observe significant differences in other secondary and exploratory endpoints. Intermittent aspirin dosing in 3-week cycles does not produce the same biologic effect as continuous dosing. Future studies should examine whether a 1-week on/1-week off schedule can maximize the efficacy and minimize the side effects. Prevention Relevance: In this three-arm double-blind randomized placebo-controlled phase II trial, we could not establish equivalence for daily aspirin 325 mg versus intermittent aspirin (3 weeks on/3 weeks off) on Ki-67:BCL2-associated X ratio. However, compared with intermittent aspirin administration, continuing aspirin was significantly more effective in reducing the Ki-67:terminal deoxyribonucleotidyl transferase-mediated dUTP nick end labeling ratio and COX-2 in rectal mucosa.</p>","PeriodicalId":72514,"journal":{"name":"Cancer prevention research (Philadelphia, Pa.)","volume":" ","pages":"321-334"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2025-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12129685/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143544744","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}